
Movie Night Presents:
Twilight
starring Kristen Stewart and Robert Pattinson
Rating: Two OMG angst much? teens (out of five)
It's been awhile since I've written a Movie Night blog. Actually, it's been awhile since I've blogged. Actually actually, it's been awhile since I've written anything but my NaNo novel. But I'm at 47K now, and I could use a brief break.
Plus, my friend Renda and I saw Twilight last night at the midnight showing. (It was a spur-of -the-moment decision at about 10:30 PM.) I figured my impressions of that movie were blog-worthy.
Twilight, for those of you currently residing under rocks, is the young adult vampire book by Stephenie Meyer. It tells the tale of Bella Swan, a high schooler who moves to Forks, Washington to live with her dad when her mom and father-in-law move to Ft. Lauderdale. While there, she falls for the amazingly handsome Edward Cullen, a fellow student who turns out to be a vampire.

Look at how really really ridiculously good-looking we all are! Of course we're vampires!
And that's all it's about. Because beyond the twenty-minute sequence where an evil vampire is hunting Bella, there is nothing more to this plot.
So, first, the good (and there are a few good things about the movie). First, we went to the midnight showing, so the comedic value of the reactions of the teenage fangirls packing the theater made it worth my ten bucks. All of them oohed and aahed and laughed in unison at the appropriate teen girl moments. One girl said as we left (and I quote): "That movie was far too short! I feel like somebody slipped me some GHB!"
The part with the evil coven of vampires was also pretty cool. James, the hunter vampire, is scary, and the fight between him and Edward is great. Also, the initial setup of Bella's family situation and her moving to Forks is engaging. I wanted to find out about Bella and what conflicts would come from her move to the Northwest.
Only I never did. Because she quickly meets Edward, and the movie loses all momentum and dives full-bore into her angst-ridden romance with a vampire.
Now, I've read this book as well, and I thought it was okay. Her writing style is similar to J. K. Rowling (with the same major shortfalls). But the failings of the book, which I could forgive, were expanded to mind-numbing proportions in the movie.
First, the damn thing is boring. There is NO CONFLICT. None. It's all about Bella and Edward pining for each other Romeo and Juliet style, but minus the backdrop of their feuding families (IE the thing that kept Romeo and Juliet moving). I guess that works if you're a teenage girl, but it gets a D-minus as a good plot.

As God as my witness, my soul-withering angst will support this movie!
And R&J is also good because it's a tragedy; they both die at the end. Guess how many of the main characters in Twilight die at the end? If your answer rhymes with "not a single goddamn one, Reid!", you win.
Second, the characters are bad. They're all two-dimensional. The good guys have no faults, and quickly devolve to charicatures if they're not one of the principal players. All the characters could have used a lot more fleshing out to make them real. That might have livened up their generally flat dialogue, too.
Third, the way it characterizes the Northwest is a travesty. Not only does it rain all the time in the movie (which isn't as true as you would think), but every other Seattle cliche is thrown into that movie too. Edward drives a Volvo, because everyone in the Northwest drives a Volvo. Everyone watches Mariners baseball. And everyone drinks Rainier beer! I haven't even seen a can of Rainier in over a decade, but all beer in this movie was Rainier. Just because the mountain's out here, it doesn't mean we have to drink anything named after it.
They also get bits wrong that no real Seattleite would: despite the fact that it does in fact rain quite often, no one in Seattle uses umbrellas. If someone has an umbrella, they're a transplant from California. So get them out of your Northwest teen-angst movie!
Such errors aren't surprising; I looked up Stephenie Meyer on Wikipedia, and she's from Connecticut. No wonder. I'm sure she decided on Forks for a setting because her Google search turned it up as the area of the US with the fewest days of sunshine.
Which brings me to my last huge beef. What's wrong with the picture below?

The tops of trees are the natural habitat of the Northwest Feral Jackalope, which would have ripped them to shreds?
Besides that.
Okay, it's DAYLIGHT in this picture! And the doofus on the left is a vampire! WTF? Twilight's assertion is that vampires don't like sunlight because (and you're gonna love this, I did):
They get all sparkly! Sunlight reflects off their skin like it's full of diamond shards. And that, people, is why vampires don't like the sun. Hence why Edward and his buddies hang out in Forks. So the lesson here, kids, is that you don't just dump one of the standards of vampire lore (they can't go out except at night), you dismember it and then pee on its grave!
I think the worst thing of all with this movie, besides having no plot and no conflict, besides throwing in every Seattle stereotype and besides raping the corpse of vampire mythology, is that the two leads have no chemistry together. That comes with casting two people whose combined career high-point is playing Cedric Diggory. Even if either of them were attractive like they were supposed to be (which they weren't), if they had displayed some attraction or chemistry with each other it still would have worked. Think Buffy and Angel, or Han and Leia. But they had nothing. Everything about their love for each other felt forced. On a movie built entirely on lovey teen angst, that absolutely destroyed whatever hope this movie had.
Again, the part where the evil vampire coven comes in was good. That was only twenty minutes of the movie, though. That conflict could easily have been on equal footing with the angst crap, and it would have improved the movie by approximately a million times.
My final verdict:
Go see Bolt. It's got a Hamster. In a ball.