MySpace


Dr COULARDEAU

Jacques COULARDEAU


Last Updated: 3/12/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 64
Sign: Aquarius

City: OLLIERGUES
State: AUVERGNE
Country: FR
Signup Date: 12/27/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Friday, July 03, 2009 

Current mood:  jubilant
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
A small film that is funny in its genre: the invasion of the earth by some aliens. You will be able to compare with so many more and other that you may find it rather humdrum, but it has a style and a taste, the taste of overfried pancakes.

NICOLE KIDMAN – INVASION – THE INVASION (OF THE BODY SNATCHERS)

One more invasion in the history of the cinema ? Banal. But this one is not  that banal because it really updates the fear. Not invaded by some kind of ugly green monster, please. Nor an egg laying alien. Let’s be more modern and be invaded by something that is invisible and yet kind of ugly. Or rather gross, like some expectoration from a throat invaded by a serious infection. Gooey, gluey, inducing vomiting more than attraction. At the same time, beyond the bla bla about the DNA and its reprogramming when the subject is falling asleep, there is another myth: peace. To transform the most brutal and ferocious surviving animal species on earth and probably in the whole universe if not cosmos into a peaceful, peace loving and peace seeking bunch of automata. That’s a dream for sure. Why not after all, to finally be able to love everyone and to forget and forgive all the evil the others have done to us, even if we have done to them maybe things that were worse. The peace you can only find during a funeral, provided no one has drunk himself or herself into a tantrum. That kind of future is frightening because you do not control yourself any more and also because there would be no fun in life any more, since fun is adventure, cops and robbers, wars, torturing chambers, dungeons, and a few dragons for fun on top of it all to crown the ice-cream with a nice cherry, you know the cherry you have forcefully taken from your neighbor yesterday night in the garden, though you just can’t remember neither the sex, nor the age, nor the name or identity of that neighbor who just was there next to you when you had a sudden desire to eat a cherry and break it in. We can’t really take that kind of fun away from all of us. Some of us need that fun, and I may say that maybe most of us need it. The film plays on that very well, till there is no escape what-so-ever, and there the film becomes a quick shortcut to a palatable end, after getting a glimpse of George W. Bush on TV. The poor woman and her son will manage to kill a few regenerated human beings who are no longer human, then she or they will kill a couple of dozens more ,and finally escape in a chopper that was handily flying by, and then on the following frame everything is back to normal, a vaccine has been found and the millions of weirdo sickly mutants have been brought back to normal. It is so nice to go back to school, to have pancakes that are not burnt, etc. The suspense is OK, the story is nothing phenomenal, Nicole Kidman wears and carries or even bears her name well, oscillating between the frenzy of a kid and the determination of an adult, but with a touch of French looking erratic psychosis. It is probably not worse than the old “Body snatchers” and the more recent remake of “The War of the Worlds”. Just entertaining, though not that much inspiring.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

Have a good night

Jacques
Currently listening:
The Invasion
By John Ottman
Release date: 2007-08-14
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 

Current mood:  exotic
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities

I CAN'T RESIST TO THAT TRIP

This is what it takes to catch up on nearly one week of work. Neglect the essential and sooner or later a rat will come back and give you the lie, the shame and the repentance.

THE COEN BROTHERS – THE BIG LEBOWSKI

This is nothing but a remake, or maybe the original (I would know if I had checked the dates: but you know, laziness, and it is funny to remain fuzzy, like the Coen Brothers themselves) of what we know under the title of “Pulp Fiction”. The Coen Brothers get rid of the shuffling time line and have episodes and chapters in order, but it is just as intricate as the other, except that it is harmless, more or less, and funny in the punk beatnik post 1968 style if you like that and the unemployed who play the Greek philosophers.. It means that the mistake in “Pulp Fiction” becomes the rule here and everything is over-reacting and mis-targeting the true victim of the explosion, of temper of course, never of any fire-arms, though quite a few are moving and travelling around, just like bowling pins and bowling balls. That’s a way of looking at  suburban social sprawl that deserves some attention and time. The best debunking of pulp fiction is in the bar-diner scene. A lot of noise and ruckus for very little. I like the breaking in, out and through of all sorts of cars. The Coen Brothers don’t seem to like cars probably because they are the best representation of American wastefulness and extreme vain arrogance. But “Pulp Fiction” seems to debunk cars too though in a different way.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

IMDb and Amazon.com Comment submitted a long time ago, August 23, 2007, not so long ago after all.

Summary:
White Russian laced with hash and horse
*** This comment may contain spoilers ***
A simple film of total disorganization that is supposed to be funny. It is another "Pulp Fiction", but this time in chronological cutting order. The disorganized impression comes from the totally airy and eerie behavior of the characters. One more or less fake Jew who respects Sabbath when it is practical. An unemployed idler who lives on thin air, fresh water and all kinds of little gains and benefits he can find. A third rather detached younger one who will end up with a massive heart attack on a parking lot. They all play with theirs balls, I mean their bowling balls, because that is the only profession we know they have. Then they get entangled into some kind of embezzling by some rich man who is not rich but wants to pilfer some good amount of cash from the foundation he is a trustee of and at the same time get rid of his youngish latest wife who is hardly grown out of teenage puberty, without going through a divorce. Simple when you are as naive as dumb can be and you don't know the alpha from the beta, not to mention the omega of crime in LA where you can end up playing the angel in no time. And they manage rather well since two will survive and one will die of too much emotion. Entertaining though slightly slow at times.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University ..Paris.. ..Dauphine.. & University ....Paris.... 1 Pantheon Sorbonne 

THECOEN BROTHERS – BLOOD SIMPLE

Jealousy, affairs and counter affairs, private eyes and sleuth, fishing and phishing in the private life of other people, the Coen Brothers are at it again. It was obvious the cuckold was not supposed to hire the private eye to eliminate his spouse and her lover. It was obvious too the lover was not supposed to get back to the bar of the cuckold, find the dead body – but was he dead really – and then get rid of it in some field, a live burial mind you. It was obvious the private eye should not have forgotten his lighter in the office of the cuckold bar owner because that could only cause the death of an innocent, well, an innocent, way of speaking for a cuckold maker – isn’t it what they call coveting the wife of your neighbor in some sacred books? – in the most spectacular way possible. In the same way that the lighter will put the sleuth on the tracks of the lady of the tale and there the Coen Brothers are going to be best of them all and it is the most un-innocent and guilty man who will finally pay – the hard way – the bill of that adulteress. And what’s more she will be the boss of the bar where there is another  bar tender that may interest her, especially since he is slightly black, a change from all her Caucasian affairs. Perfect conclusion for a Machiavellian machination.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

THE COEN BROTHERS – THE HUDSUCKER PROXY

The Coen Brothers had to go to the Wall of lamentations of ....Hollywood.... and remake Orson Welles’ “Citizen Kane”. How can you inherit the greatest fortune in the world and know about it when you are going to hit the sidewalk falling from the fifty-fifth or fifty-fourth floor, according to you counting or not the mezzanine. At this moment your life is suspended in mid air by one blonde hair of your ideal love affair, or love targeted prey, ,and that hair is the broom stick of a black janitor, which is niggardly indeed, and the denture of an old spook who refuses innovation in stock exchange managing. The whole film is a hoopla about nothing, a hula hoop or a budsucker straw. The whole film revolve around a conception of the press that is quite Kanesque, scandal, hidden secrets, false accusations and true insinuations, in one word pulp pulp and pulp again. And the newly made rich man is living his accident – becoming rich out of no logic – as if it were natural and did not require any thinking, pondering and brain exploration if not surgery, like in some cuckoo’s nest of fame. And it even ends up with a marriage. Isn’t it funny? Are the Coen Brothers growing romantic? Probably not, but sentimentally sarcastic for sure.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

THE FLAGS OF OUR FATHERS

To take the battle of ..Iwo Jima.. and show how that war, that turning point, maybe not, that dramatic apocalypse, for sure, of the Second World War, American side, is a pure illustration of what an apocalypse is: a revelation. Clint Eastwood with his Steven Spielberg accomplice demonstrate that revelation and its secret content. The kids who are sent to a war, any war, all wars, are no heroes whatsoever and in any way but they are the flesh and dough of the cannons of the enemy, or rather the other side. And they even have to lie and play heroes to get the dough the government needs to continue and finish that war. Those heroes are associated to flags and the raising of flags on a pile of ruins to show and inspire victory, be it in ..Iwo Jima.., ..Berlin.. or ....Hiroshima..... Heroes are fabricated for the sole reason that they are needed to go on with the lucrative and politically essential war, on any side of the conflict. For one flag, and in this conflict hardly more than half a dozen flags for fifty five million dead. That makes each star on  the flags, when these flags have stars, quite expensive. There is no clean war, there is no un-staged war, there is no just war. There is only war, war horror and staging the horror to make it palatable to those who do not live it, have not lived it, do not remember it. And some invent a duty to remember, an obligation to keep in mind, even when we are two or three or more generations after the conflict and we do not have direct witnesses to speak of it any more, and their word is only their word modified by time, propaganda, celebrations and simply the desire to forget. There is no obligation to remember, even if there is an obligation to make, not only permit them to, historians go on with their work and try to reconstruct what has disappeared forever anyway. In fact a poet could be more effective in that direction than a historian who is paid for his work and tends to follow the trend of whoever pays him, be they publishers or politicians, or committed associations on one side or the other of the many rivers that run through historical time. Clint Eastwood and Steven Spielberg do a marvelous work along that line.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID


HAVE A GOOD NIGHT AND A BRAVE DAY

Jacques

Currently listening:
Flags of Our Fathers
Release date: 2006-10-17
Friday, June 26, 2009 

Current mood:  high
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
I did not see that Batman when it came out, but I should because it is better than many prequels. What's more it makes you review all you klnow about that literature, in books oron the screen.

BATMAN BEGINS

That’s a typical prequel. After a certain number of films about and with Batman and his adventures, the saga felt the need to have an origin, a beginning, and a prequel came out of the box. This prequel really has all the necessary qualities to make it interesting, plus a few extra kicks. Of course the childhood of the dear Bruce. He fell into a well, which was not a well but it looked like one and he frightened thousands of bats who attacked him on their way to some escape. That’s his fear. Then he is the witness of the double assassination, or murder, of his father and his mother, and then we jump to his young age when he runs around the world and ends up in some Tibetan ninja-monk-hostel where he meets with some crazy guru who wants to make the world right by killing everyone in Gotham as an example to the world. Our Bruce refuses and comes back to ..Gotham.. and tries to set things right, to set crime right, to bring criminals to court and to have them severely convicted and sentenced. It’s when the guru comes back and tries to put his plan in action. Batman will stop him of course, and at the same time he will settle his family business right by re-buying the shares of it and taking the control of it directly. Plus a crazy doctor, or mad doctor if you prefer, plus his girl friend from far away, Rachel, and a little bit of sentimental honey. You have it right. It must work if you create fear and panic. As for that the film is superb and the special effects are so special they nearly look natural though abnormal. Of course the formula is not new. I could quote films and books with the same elements, maybe not all at the same time in one book or one film, but all in Stephen King, Anne Rice and many others. The lessons that are behind that story is that you cannot make people happy if they don’t want to be; that you cannot trust any unregulated free market economy because there are also some human beings who will negotiate all obstacles to make a bigger profit, and embezzling and corruption will bring the system down; that there is no justice if there is not a court, a trial, a conviction, a sentence, and the possibility of parole; that people need a dream, a symbol, a vision to be set on the right road and to stay on it. And a few other goodies, if you read between the lines and behind the punctuation. Quite great fun all together and if you don’t like the philosophy, you can always get detached and fly to some kind of nirvana, even if it is artificial.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

I guess I am going to go to bed. I have plenty of Buddhism to study tomorrow.

Jacques
Currently listening:
Batman Begins
Release date: 2005-06-14
Thursday, June 25, 2009 

Current mood:  bored
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
What a bore that film they made into a piece of genius, or should I say the piss of a genius, or maybe a piece of plain shit.

SACHA BARON COHEN  BORAT

Borat rhymes with two things : boring forward and gore backward. To turn anything hateful and disgusting into some kind of humorous item from the big trick store round the corner is not easy, but is it funny? What’s more I had already seen many of these gagging choking gags in other films, like drinking from the toilet bowl, bringing your feces in a plastic bag to the dinner table for disposal, inviting a street lady to a dinner party in a middle class home, and so many others. In fact Schwarzenegger is more effective in that line of the cultural gap or shock between the good old Soviet culture and the American lifestyle when he plays the KGB officer in New York running after a couple of Georgian Mafiosi in Red Heat if I remember well. It is amazing how they have, through advertising, made this film into what it is not, a funny film whereas it is sad and even very sad to see the thickness of disrespect they accumulate and pile up in order to produce a shocked little laugh. But one thing is sure. This film represent the spirit of its time, that end of an eight year tenure that was getting so stale and so full of carbon dioxide and poor in oxygen that we were dying like a poor fish thrown on the grassy bank of a dried up river. Even the bush of the rose garden were severely wilted and close to death from drought, the drought of the absence of basic honesty and truthful freedom of speech. But that does not save the film, that makes it an archeological testimony of the lurking death in which we were drowning then.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

Have a good retch

Jacques
Currently listening:
Borat
By Original Soundtrack
Release date: 2006-10-31
Wednesday, June 24, 2009 

Current mood:  blah
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
It is funny to go back in time and rediscover the first film of a series, the first attempt, the first matrix. Funny and yet a little bit disappointing because that first film is always less powerful than the next ones, at least in a good series, and this Ocean is one good case.

OCEAN’S ELEVEN

The first film of the Ocean saga, trilogy, so far, The first one is the prototype and prototype it is. One simple situation. A casino in Las Vegas. A complicated security set up but nothing impregnable because impregnable is not in Hollywood’s dictionary. A whole set of gangsters led by Brad, Matt and George, and enjoying themselves very much. Of course they succeed with a little bit of high tech. And they stage the whole thing for the casino entrepreneur who falls in the trap of what he sees on his video cameras and on his surveillance screens and then he finds out he has been tricked and that the bill of the trick is something around 163 million dollars, maybe less, maybe more, who knows, but sure more than the trick his female, or male, employees are selling to the hotel and casino customers. It is apparently easy to lure this business gangster or this gangster businessman: flatter his vain and arrogant ego by flattering his security because he believes he has the best security in the world, and then you can go through. Apart from that tricky complicated situation, the film is very simple, if not ordinary. But after all it is only a matrix: it has to remain simple to breed good sequels, and this one bred two sequels. Good entertainment, for the actors too I guess.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

Enjoy your night

Jacques
Currently listening:
Ocean's Eleven
By David Holmes
Release date: 2001-12-04
Tuesday, June 23, 2009 

Current mood:  handsome
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
The film is still looking for its Doctor Lecter, but the book is too. Yet it is interesting to see the birth of a myth.

MANHUNTER – RED DRAGON – THOMAS HARRIS

The first episode of Doctor Lecter, before “The Silence of the Lamb” and “Hannibal”. The Doctor is already in prison and he is already playing from there with some serial killers and the FBI. But the book is slightly still in construction, and the film is too. We do have the serial killer, and the new technique of profiling. But it is still not entirely squared out. The FBI man is still relying on his instinct, his sixth sense, his intuition, his inner eye to understand the feelings and the thoughts of the killer and capture him by being able to foresee what he is going to do. But that paranormal element is not convincing, though it is commonly used in some detective TV series. Thomas Harris is going to get to real profiling only in the next volume. Even the great visionary power of Doctor Lecter will become the unavoidable logic of the mind, of the psyche, of the deranged mental power of the insane doctor only then. He is a genius in his psychiatric field and his derangement gives him the capability to know no limits. But that is still to come. Here though Thomas Harris settles some accounts with journalists and has one burnt alive. He also settles some revenge with story telling and twists the story line in some unforeseen ways now and then. These moments are magic in a way since they are unexplained and they restart the dynamic of the tale that could have become humdrum. The story seems to settle some accounts with a couple of commonplace if not trite ideas. The whole logic of the killer is to think that his being seen over and over again by a women during the last five minutes of their lives as if their eyes were silver mirrors would lead him to be loved and to come to terms with his desire to kill. His last victim actually loves him in a way and/but she is blind. She loves him because she is blind and he kills her out of no reason and she will not be able to “see” him when she dies. Of course that victim will survive because our FBI man-hunter will come into the picture unannounced. Thomas Harris also deals with the idea that all serial killers were boys who were mistreated when children, probably by their parents, even more probably somewhere by their mothers. That kind of a cliché is so simple that it does not sound true nor serious, some kind of a joke, maybe a big wink with a grin at the nasty and dirty mind of the reader. But this cliché will be present in absolutely all the Doctor Lecter books, in a way or another. In this case it is really superficial. It is interesting to see, after reading it, this first episode in the story of Doctor Lecter, first episode as it came out of the mind of its author because we can see and feel the genetic dimension of the saga, because it was to become a saga and today it even has become a cultish trip into criminal insanity.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

Have a good night

Jacques
Currently listening:
The Best of Hannibal: Music from Hannibal, Red Dragon, The Silence of the Lambs
Release date: 2005-10-10
Saturday, June 20, 2009 

Current mood:  fabulous
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
Beowulf is a myth and the cinema has recently tried to work on it. This "Beowulf and Grendel" is not the best. I miss the story telling that is so important in this long poem: how the heroes have to tell and sing their adventures in the night-time celebrations and drinking sessions that always follow the deeds themselves. I also miss the Nordic myths and magic, the allusion to these pre-human giant worlds that Anne Rice used so well in her witch novels on the Mayfair family.

BEOWULF AND GRENDEL

The scenery is flabbergasting and awe-inspiring. Beautiful mountains and fjords, vertiginous seascape and landscape, little winter and snow. It is not a film about the cold north but the heroic pagan mystery of this northern climes. Pagan with some beings coming from we do not know where, though the troll is explained very clearly from the very start as being the son of a man who was killed in some atrocious way by some Danes, just because he was coming from somewhere else and he “stole” a fish. The son then escapes and survives in nature alone. He becomes a wild child that does not speak any human language and is only looking for his vengeance on the Danish chief who had his father killed and who spared the child’s life out of some human feeling. Beowulf is the one who is going to get that “troll”, and the story is very close to the English Beowulf, though they try once again to make things look natural, normal. It kills in many ways the meaning and the power of some symbols, and you will never know that Beowulf used a sword from the giants who were on earth before human beings, and that this sword is decorated with runes and interlacing runic tangles. The fact that he has to resort to this sword he finds in the hoard of the mother of this Grendel, some kind of unexplained amphibious monster, appears to be a simple accident, while it is an essential and meaningful element: these monsters are the descendants of the giants that dominated the world before human beings. Some future is told by a witch but she uses bones instead of using the famous runes. The most important addition to this film, as compared to the original story, is this witch who was more or less raped once by Grendel and who got a son from him. Does this element give any humanity to the tale? I do not think so. Does it emphasizes the pagan side of the tale? Maybe but we have to say the repetitive christenings are at least counterbalancing this pagan element. The last interesting side of the film is the realistic rendition of the habitat of these northern human beings and that is neither comfortable, nor in anyway clean or well-ordered. It sure is the story of humanity emerging out of old phases of animal or pre-human existence, but this emergence is identified too much with the Christianization of Scandinavia. In one word is a good film of action though it is rather naïve as for the real anthropological or even archeological dimension  of the story, and it is rather too far from the Anglo-Saxon poem to be considered as a fair adaptation of the first part of this poem. We are missing the dragon of the second part and the death of the hero.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

Have a good night

Jacques
Currently listening:
Beowulf
Release date: 2000-01-01
Sunday, June 14, 2009 

Current mood:  giddy
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
A very good film, long by the way, on being a Diaspora. Is it more important to stick to what you are and be pushed on the road or to decide to develop within the society where you are which means accept compromises and a certain amount of warping for the sacred traditions.

FIDDLER ON THE ROOF

A myth in the cinema. It was the time when the Jews were trying to get out of the Soviet Union where private economic initiative was totally impossible and where the Jews were shown as being unpatriotic people. That’s what the film is showing with two directions for the expelled Jews: the USA and Israel. But the film is a lot more interesting than that. It shows how traditions are lethal. Traditions kill any initiative and change in any social group, in any society. It kills the possibility to remain open onto the world. It kills the possibility to accept human feelings as more important than match making or whatever other alliances. And at the same time it shows that everyday joys, and pleasures, and celebrations come from a tradition and that tradition has to be kept alive but to keep it alive you need to change it. One of these traditions is that the Jews have been on the run for twenty-one centuries, at least without counting their slavery in Egypt and their captivity in Babylon. And yet the film is also looking at the Jews with some kind of irony, humor, sarcasm, maybe even more. It makes fun of their constantly quoting the Book, of there constantly going back to God and praying, of their constantly seeing themselves as an elected people and as the favorite victim of God. It turns funny quite often, though it is tragic all along. It shows how hard but also easy it is for a people to accept to move on, to be kicked out of where they are. It shows how it is satisfying a deep desire to move somewhere else, that deep part of all human beings since the human species is a migrating species and has always been, and at the same time it shows how it is frustrating the other dimension of the human species which is to stabilize in one place, to grow roots somewhere and branches from these roots, and yet only to produce a new generation that will move on. So the film is nostalgic, a nostalgic celebration of the Jewish Diaspora, but as a reflection of the human Diaspora that has become so difficult today with visas and all kinds of barriers to cross in order to get on the other side of the road because the grass is always greener on the other side of the road. But when this side is locked up with barbed wire and walls and guards and weapons, the grass on the other side is really greener, though the fight for survival should be the objective on this side of the road. Escaping is in a way easy. The young revolutionary who is sent to Siberia has understood the real objective of the human species: to survive with the whole society that is around us, all together, as one group that has to be varied and all-inclusive. That’s the real battle, and not to push further on or farther on to the USA or to Israel. That is what surviving means today for the human species: to develop one’s individuality within the developing group where we live and within the global human community. There is no escape there and the Fiddler on the Roof will follow everywhere to remind us of that human duty.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

But the times must have changed because the film has lost a lot of emotional value about the Jews, because since then there have been tens of Diasporas, some even created by the Jews themselves, like the Palestinians.

Have a good night

Jacques
Currently listening:
Fiddler on the Roof
By Jerry Bock
Release date: 2001-10-09
Saturday, June 13, 2009 

Current mood:  blessed
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
Three films of different genres but all admirable achievements.

COEN BROTHERS – BARTON FINK

The anti-Hollywoodish film par excellence. The idea and the concept is simple. A successful playwright on Broadway in New York is bought with a lot of money by some Hollywoodish studio to become a scenario writer. Of course he fails. But these studios want to keep him to be able to use his name. So when such authors fail, the studios enslave them by implementing the very letter of the contracts they had signed without reading the small print. They cannot write for anyone else and then they are paired with some secretary who is going to write what the studios want under the name of the author who does not write anything at all. We cannot even call that humor. It is cynical exploitation and on the side of the Coen Brothers morbid and death carrying sarcasm. The film does not really stand a second viewing. We then see the cables behind the façade and we know the fishmonger of the beginning is nothing but a prop or a vocal stunt from some uncaring stage operator.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

JOHN LE CARRÉ – ALEC GUINNESS – TINKER TAILOR SOLDIER SPY

This series from the BBC is probably great. Probably because it has everything it needs to be great and yet it sounds in the end a little bit sad, too slow, too obvious to be true, believable and such stories need to be believed. It is one of the most beautiful story from the Cold War, about the fable of the Russian spy inside the spying service of Her gracious British Queen. The main interest is how the service is paralyzed by inside hostilities, inside vanities, inside rivalries that kill all possible initiatives to find out who is embedded in the comfortable armchairs of that service. The secret services and spying services of any country become complacent after a while and that’s the way you can infiltrate them in no time. You just have to play the superficial game of faithfulness and fidelity and orthodoxy and blind obedience, and then you can do what you want and become the best Russian spy ever. When finally someone arrives from ahigh to investigate he becomes the object and target of absolutely all hostilities and jealousies and everyone is ready to kill him if necessary, poison or handguns are best. That’s the only real interest of this series. The patriotic motivations of the good spies are superficial and in fact not argument-supported at all. It is something that is considered as natural: every patriot loves his or her country and is ready to die for it. Then the motivations of the Russian spy are just as superficial, dealing with the hypocrisy of this democracy where so few people have real power and real control over the life of millions of powerless subjects who are lured by the baits of elections. Standard communist discourse from these old years of the 1950s and 1960s. The final touch is how the surveillance of this spy under custody is so loose that he can get an appointment from someone outside, get out of the building and get “liberated” by his own assassination in a peaceful park. In other words they let him organize his own final exit. Hypocrisy we were saying. It is far more shameful cynicism. But the series is played so well by so good actors. That’s the best part of British TV: real actors are acting in the series and not beginners or mediocre middle aged non-entities. It is a real pleasure, even if the small screen of this medium reduces these actors to close-up shots and hardly anything else.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

JOHN CARPENTER - CHRISTINE

This film will be effective and pungent forever. We can regret the reduced presence of old rock and roll music in the film, as compared to the novel. We can regret the absence of the pregnant theme of Arnold’s being haunted by the car to the point of the car getting him away from the crime scene when necessary. Then the ending is a lot less pathetic, poignant and powerful. It is even slightly weak. But the film as a whole is a masterpiece. A masterpiece about these teenagers and their only interests in life, the car and the girl they possess, want to possess or aspire to possess, just like they drink beer, out of spite. But it is always a question of possession. King inverts the direction of this fatal element and the owner is possessed by his own piece of property. The depicting of the possessive and tyrannical parents is superb. The magic of the car is beautiful. The bullies and the way they are treated all along and the way they are reduced to trashing a car and defecating on its dashboard is absolutely pitiless and treats them just the way they should and must be treated: like trash. We find it a good positive thing that these worth-nothing individuals are crashed and crushed and exploded and burnt to death by the car they have dared insult and trash themselves. Vengeance has such a sweet taste to the virginal tongue of a teenager who still thinks his tongue is done to lick ice-cream cones. There is little more to say about it except that it is obvious adults are giving little damn about teenagers. The film only has five adults. The parents who are aggressively possessive. The workshop teacher who is absent when he should not be and then violent when he should have prevented it by being in his place at the right time: that is called duty. Then Darnell who is suspicious, hostile, greedy, rotten and corrupt, and yet impotent in front of such a miracle: a teenager kept on a leash by a magical car. Finally the inspector did not understand anything, or rather, if he understood anything, did not do what he should have done: put Arnie and his car under surveillance, and even the car in custody, not to say in prison. He let the criminal and its accessory free to go on killing. And that was a state cop, from the State of California. That’s what I call a respectable body of the security forces of our modern world. Yet I do prefer the book, even if John Carpenter avoided the pink color of the bulldozer which is in the film a pink kaka-eater. Plain yellow is more visually realistic. A pink bulldozer sounds like a pink panther.

Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, University Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, University Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, CEGID

Have a good night

Jacques
Currently listening:
Christine: Original Motion Picture Soundtrack Score
Release date: 1990-06-01
Friday, June 12, 2009 

Current mood:  breezy
Category: News and Politics
ATLANTIC-COMMUNITY.ORG
 
Alessandra Radicati’S Opinion
            June 2, 2009 
                   Tough Road Ahead for Post Civil-War Sri Lanka
Now that the civil war seems to be over, the current Sri Lankan government needs to avoid the mistakes of its predecessors and embrace the Tamil community, not alienate it further. How the Government implements post conflict policies will be vital in the country’s reunification.
Now is not the time to celebrate. The civil war in Sri Lanka, which since 1983 has been responsible for the deaths of more than 60,000 people (with a spike in the fatalities since January), a huge diaspora and the militarization of an entire generation of both Sinhalese and Tamil youth, is over. But as is often the case with civil wars - where groups have to live side by side after the violence has stopped - the hardest part is yet to come.

The UK's Guardian newspaper estimates that around 250,000 people are facing years in government camps before being allowed to return to their homes. Sri Lankan officials say that this is necessary in determining who among them is a Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) member.
The Sri Lankan civil war and its aftermath, perhaps more than any other conflict, is going to force us to re-think what it means to be an insurgent, and to probe deeply into matters of forgiveness and reconciliation in addition to posing a number of important policy concerns. These questions may seem abstract, but they are critical to Sri Lankans and to the international community if the country is to move forward.

As Sankaran Krishna points out in Postcolonial Insecurities, at various times both Sri Lankan and Indian dominant discourses have painted Tamils as anti-national, enemies of larger moves towards a cultural awakening. The Sri Lankan government seems to be perpetuating this view of Tamils by effectively criminalizing all those who happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, caught between LTTE and government forces.
By treating all of them like full-fledged insurgents, the Sri Lankan government is communicating to Tamils that there is no place for them in a unified Sri Lanka, that they will always be outsiders. But this need not be the case. Constructivism can provide a useful lens for understanding the current situation in Sri Lanka because it gives us hope; hope that like their neighbors in Tamil Nadu, Sri Lankan Tamils can remain openly proud of their culture but still participate peacefully in national politics.

This cannot happen if the Sri Lankan government continues its policy of detaining Sri Lankan civilians because of their ethnicity. The binary distinctions of "insurgent/civilian" and "guilty/innocent" will prove useless in distinguishing between various members of Sri Lanka's diverse Tamil population. Are Tamils born and raised under LTTE control "insurgents" if they provided food to combatants, who formed the only real government they ever knew? Is having been compensated with the pay given to families of suicide bombers a mark of guilt? What about the role of current and former child soldiers? How can we deal with the complexity that surrounds notions of guilt for those who began killing when they were not even 18? Moving past the traditional notions of guilt and innocence will be crucial for the country to move on. Members of the LTTE who actively helped plan and participate in war crimes should be held accountable, as should government officials guilty of the same things.

What reconciliation can take place between two groups that have completely different collective memories of their experiences since independence? Again, we cannot afford to fall into the "binary trap" - assuming that Sri Lanka is either at war with itself, or that there will be instant peace. Co-existence is more realistic. Tamils and Sinhalese need to literally begin speaking the other’s language. Though unpalatable to many in Colombo and the international community, the LTTE's stated willingness to participate in the democratic process should be taken seriously, not rebuffed.

A comparison between India and Sri Lanka is tenuous given that the Dravidian movement was never an insurgency. But if we want Sri Lanka's future (if not it's past) to resemble India's, dealing with these difficult questions and crafting appropriate institutions will be necessary. India's federal model can take much (though not all) of the credit for the peaceful route taken by Dravidian parties. The Sri Lankan government needs to let go of the idea of a unitary state and realize that a federal solution is in order, one that recognizes Tamil rights and responsibilities as part of the larger Sri Lankan polity.  Maybe then we can celebrate.
Alessandra Radicati is an MA student and teaching assistant at McGill University's Department of Political Science.
 
             MY ANSWER
June 13, 2009
Jacques COULARDEAU, Université Paris 1 Sorbonne Panthéon, (4)
This point of view is purely personal and lacks academic distance. If we speak of history we have to go a lot farther back than 1983. The Tamils are not from Sri Lanka originally. They were brought there by the English in the 19th century to work on the plantations on which the Buddhist original population refused to work. These Tamils were probably running away from the Hindu caste system and were from very low castes, and even Untouchables, Dalits. The English treated them as plantation slaves: they had no land, no real homes, no schooling. They were entirely dependent on their masters the plantation owners. In one word the English reproduced the system they had produced in their American colonies, this time with Tamil slaves, or semi-slaves.
The first thing that has to be explained is how this total dispossession could be accepted in the 19th century in a continent with a very old civilization. The caste system of Hinduism is probably the answer. Dispossessed low caste Tamils were ready to accept the “better” living conditions of the plantations, better as compared to the brutal caste system of India, Tamils or Hindis alike, not to speak of the Dalits of course. This historical heritage explains the hostility between the two communities that the English created themselves by bringing the Tamils into Sri Lanka. That does not excuse the excessive and discriminating violence of the majority of the population against the Tamils after the liberation. It is this hostility that explains the next stage, which is the grafting of the Maoist ideology onto the ethnic and religious situation.
That’s what this article forgets too. The inspiration of Prabhakaran comes from Maoism at the time of the Cultural Revolution, hence quite many years before 1983 and his first great deed was the assassination of the Mayor of Jaffna. The dispossession of the Tamils under the British by the British and the caste system of their own religion were transformed into a revolutionary and basic norm: human beings are not supposed to own the earth, to own anything. Private property is banned and only collective property is accepted. That creates a total dependence of the population on the state. Then a total dictatorship can develop without having the taste of it.
The LTTE is such an organization that has here and there in the world and here and then in history captured the imagination of a people and then has maintained that capture by making the people captive, the captives of this organization. And elections are not needed since the support is natural, complete, total. And the secret police is nothing but a way to protect this perfect support from negative influences from outside. Hitler did it, Stalin did it, Mao did it, Castro did it, etc. If we do not understand that we cannot understand what is happening right now under our eyes.
That kind of government, of political organization, of political philosophy produces total stagnation since it bans anything from the outside, anything that goes against the official “truth” of this regime, and that “truth” is of course a lie because there is no truth, only points of view and these have to confront one another constantly. That’s what we call democracy. But the world is following the road its inner contradictions (social, economic, cultural, biological or even geological, etc) and outer contradictions (environmental, cosmic or purely astronomical) determine and blaze at every instant of this historical development of ours. That is its end, its finality, its target, but contradictions, inner or outer, will never disappear. They may change but then new ones will appear and develop and history will go on along that road these contradictions will blaze. To believe history has a final point was the mistake of Saint John in his messianic Jerusalem, or of Marx in his communistic paradise, or of Fukuyama and the perfect democracy and free society. Society will never be free of contradictions and history will go on, till the cosmos decides that the earth has to disappear for its own structural physical reasons.
All these Maoist movements have to either get back into the main political stream like in Nepal, or be erased from the society in a way or another, like the LTTE in Sri Lanka, not to speak of the famous successors of Mao, Lin Piao and his other three acolytes. Then of course the survivors can be eventually entrusted with being believed that they want to get back into the political democratic system. But we have to be very clear about the 250,000 people who “followed” the LTTE into their final end. Either they were real supporters as the LTTE said and then they have to be treated as supporters and suspects and people detaining enough information about where the weapons are and who is ready to start all over again. Or they were hostages and they have to be taken care of properly, which of course does not mean trust them as being all of them pure victims of the LTTE. Among these there must be quite a few LTTE soldiers there. The ascendants of Prabhakaran himself were among the last batch of freed civilians just before the last battle that had no survivors. It does not matter whether these LTTE soldiers merging with true civilians were born under Prabhakaran’s dictatorship or whether they were children-soldiers or whatever. They have to be found out and reformed in their minds. We all know that these children-soldiers have been indoctrinated with violence and killing objectives and that they have been traumatized by this indoctrination that they are not even able to control their simplest reactions. How many Germans were made prisoners after WW2 and kept in camps for several years? Ask Guenther Grass about it. He knows.
This article is thus extremely naïve.
But also badly informed. The speech the President of Sri Lanka delivered in Parliament in Colombo after the end was in Tamil and not in Sinhala, at least partly. That’s the line: integrate the Tamils, restore democracy and democratically elected authorities in all the provinces and then work on implementing a new organization of the country that has to be decided after discussion by the Srilankans themselves and not by us from our university chairs. But the Tamils, including quite a few officials and officers and “cadres” as they call them in Sri Lanka of the LTTE, have already reintegrated the political system, particularly in the eastern provinces. And that is not entirely new.
The Foreign Minister of Sri Lanka who was assassinated by the LTTE in August 2005 was a Tamil. The country was shocked and I was there to see these reactions. The Prime Minister of the time had to contain some reactions that were anti-Tamil. The Prime Minister of the time was the President of today. I believe that assassination played an essential role in the nomination of Mahinda Rajapaksa as the candidate of the “left” in the presidential election of November 2005 and in his victory, amplified in a way by the LTTE’s decision that the provinces under their control were not going to vote.
Terrorism is no longer acceptable and less and less accepted in the world. Compare the election of Hamas in Gaza under Bush administration and the surprise failure to be elected of Hezbollah in Lebanon under Obama, two or three days after his speech in Cairo. And probably the events of the last week of campaign in Iran and the results I do not know at the time when I am writing this opinion.
The real problem that is now on the slate of Sri Lanka is the reconstruction of the country and the final recovery of the central geopolitical position of Sri Lanka as a hub between the various sea-routes coming from the North (the Silk Roads: the one via Tibet and down to Calcutta, and the one via Kazakhstan and Pakistan through the new sea harbor built by the Chinese) and the other routes from the West and the East, from and to the Mediterranean Sea and southern Europe, from and to Indonesia, South East Asia, Australia and the Pacific Ocean, not to speak of the South route to Africa and Madagascar.
It is high time that we, the West, understand what is changing in the world and in what direction the world is going so that violence can one day be either contained or even gotten rid of. The politicians in power must understand they have to drop their old arrogant colonial stand of pre-emptive domination, and the politicians who define themselves as an alternative, as progressive, as the “left” if it means anything, must understand they must stop supporting organizations that have been violent all along and refuse to change their style and means. The FARCs are for one example a sorry survival of the Cold War period and of the pre-emptive domination of the western establishment over the whole world after the fall of the Wall of Berlin.
Dr Jacques COULARDEAU, Université de Paris 1 Panthéon Sorbonne.
Currently listening:
Mahler: The Complete Symphonies & Orchestral Songs / Bernstein
By Gustav Mahler
Release date: 1998-11-10