MySpace


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

PRINCIPLES - VALUES - VIRTUES - MORALS

Welcome and thank you for stopping by. Please be aware and advised, this is a CONSERVATIVE BLOG. Here is some information and my rules: 1) I do not like Liberal Ideology; 2) Conservatives have the voice of reason on my blog; 3) I will delete any comments that are abusive, non-related to the "blog theme" and not debated in a civil manner; 4) I welcome input from all walks of life. However, this is my blog and I will make the "ultimate" decision on any/all comments. I encourage "civil" discussion. We may not agree on "ideology". However, we can agree on "respect" and at least listening to different perspectives. If you would like to subscribe, click on the picture of the EAGLE above. Thank you for visiting!
DocManJay© - One Nation Under God

Doc ManJay


Last Updated: 6/9/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 39
Sign: Gemini

City: PHILLY, NEW JERSEY
State: New York
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/8/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
June 11, 2009 - Thursday 

Category: News and Politics
Elections have consequences!

- Doc






Trust on Issues
Voters Now Trust Republicans More than Democrats on Economic Issues


Voters now trust Republicans more than Democrats on six out of 10 key issues, including the top issue of the economy.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 45% now trust the GOP more to handle economic issues, while 39% trust Democrats more.

This is the first time in over two years of polling that the GOP has held the advantage on this issue. The parties were close in May, with the Democrats holding a modest 44% to 43% edge. The latest survey was taken just after General Motors announced it was going into bankruptcy as part of a deal brokered by the Obama administration that gives the government majority ownership of the failing automaker.

Voters not affiliated with either party now trust the GOP more to handle economic issues by a two-to-one margin.

Separate Rasmussen tracking shows that the economy remains the top issue among voters in terms of importance.

Republicans also now hold a six-point lead on the issue of government ethics and corruption, the second most important issue to all voters and the top issue among unaffiliated voters. That shows a large shift from May, when Democrats held an 11-point lead on the issue.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter.

For the eighth straight month, Republicans lead on national security. The GOP now holds a 51% to 36% lead on the issue, up from a seven-point lead in May. They also lead on the war in Iraq 45% to 37%, after leading by just two points in May and trailing the Democrats in April.

Fewer voters see national security as a very important issue this month, but confidence that the United States and its allies are winning the War on Terror is at its highest level since February.

Republicans lead the Democrats on immigration for the third straight month, pulling ahead to a 35% to 29% advantage on the issue.

On taxes, the GOP leads the Democrats for the fifth straight month, 44% to 39%. In May and April, Republicans held six-point leads on the issue.

Democrats continue to hold the lead on the issues of health care, Social Security and education. While Democrats have a 10-point advantage on health care, that’s down from the 18-point lead the party had a month ago.

Democrats lead by six points on Social Security, down from nine points in May. The parties were tied on the issue in April.

On education, Democrats hold a 44% to 37% lead over Republicans.
The parties are tied on the issue of abortion for the second straight month, each earning 41% support from voters.

Please sign up for the Rasmussen Reports daily e-mail update (it’s free) or follow us on Twitter. Let us keep you up to date with the latest public opinion news.

June 11, 2009 - Thursday 

Category: News and Politics
Tick, tock, tick, tock, tick, tock.....

- Doc





Gingrich at Republican Fundraiser Says Obama's 'Already Failed'




June 9 (Bloomberg) -- Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said President Barack Obama’s plan to fix the economy through stimulus spending and government intervention to boost companies like General Motors Corp. has "already failed."

Gingrich was the keynote speaker at a fundraising dinner for the Republican House and Senate campaign committees, filling a role President George W. Bush had served for the past eight years.

"Bureaucrats managing companies does not work, politicians dominating the economy does not work," Gingrich told about 2,000 Republicans who attended the event at the Washington Convention Center last night.
Some Republican leaders hailed Gingrich, the leader of the 1994 "Republican Revolution," as a de facto head of the party at a time when Republicans are looking for ideas to lead them back to the majority.

In introducing Gingrich, Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin called him the “architect of the last reform movement” and “the man of ideas.”

Gingrich was preceded by a series of Republican leaders who also took aim at Democrats and the government bailout of Detroit-based GM, New York-based American International Group Inc. and other companies.

Congress in February passed a $787 billion stimulus measure that Republican lawmakers have criticized, saying it hasn’t lived up to administration promises.

Obama said yesterday there are signs the economy may be headed toward a recovery. "We're seeing a reduction in the fear that gripped the market just a few months ago," he said at the White House.

‘Radical Agenda’

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said Obama has a "radical agenda." Republicans have "watched them take over banks, insurance companies, auto companies," he said, “and now they want to take over your health care.”
"We’re going to need some wins next November to slow down their agenda," said McConnell. House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio said Democrats are using their control of Congress "to bury our children and the middle class under a mountain of debt."

Actor Jon Voight, the master of ceremonies, opened the evening with a series of sharp attacks on Obama, something many Republican leaders have been hesitant to do in light of the president’s high approval ratings.
A USA Today/Gallup Poll taken May 29-31 gave him a 61 percent approval rating.
‘Weak Nation’

"We are becoming a weak nation," said Voight, calling Obama a "false prophet." Republicans need to find their way back to power to free the nation from "this Obama oppression," he said.

Both McConnell and Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, who followed Voight, seemed pleasantly surprised.

"I’m still just reveling that someone from Hollywood made a speech like that. I hope you’re going to be able to find work after this," said McConnell. "I really enjoyed that."
Senator John Cornyn of Texas called the speech "refreshing."

The dinner, which included 150 members of Congress, raised $14.5 million for the Republican House and Senate campaign committees.

Alaska Governor and former Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin and Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell were among the special guests.

Gingrich dialed back his criticism of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor, only saying she is "wrong" on the issue of quotas, without citing any rulings she had made in favor of racial quotas.
Gingrich Controversy
After Obama nominated Sotomayor on May 26, Gingrich posted a blog saying, "A white man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw."
On June 3, Gingrich took back his description of her as a "racist," though he continued to criticize a 2001 speech by her as a "betrayal" of fundamental principles. In the speech, she suggested a "wise Latina" would reach "better" decisions than white males.
Obama nominated Sotomayor, 54, last month to succeed retiring Justice David Souter. If confirmed by the Senate, she would be the first Hispanic to sit on the nation’s highest court.
Obama said last week: "I’m sure she would have restated" her 2001 remarks if given the chance and that she was saying that her life experiences would help her understand other people’s struggles.
Republican lawmakers have sought to distance themselves from the "racist" claims of Gingrich and conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh.

June 6, 2009 - Saturday 

Category: Religion and Philosophy









May 30, 2009 - Saturday 

Category: News and Politics
We don't hear or talk about the Korean War that much in the US anymore.  Is anyone  aware of why Korea is divided and the U.S. has troops in South Korea for the past 50+ years?

Those who remember or know about the inhuman treatment by the communists know full well what this great country fought against in WWII and the Korean war.

The United States is hated by other nations because the United States helps any country or peoples who want the freedom of Democracy over a totalitarian government.  That is one of the reasons why Korea is divided into the North and South.

However, something very strange is in the wind with North Korea as of late.  They are absolutely defying the Asiatic's region on testing their nuclear weapons.  In fact they now claim that they have fully functional nuclear weapons and will use them.

I am not fully sure on why many are becoming more and more emboldened by dismissing their treaties and agreements as of late.  But it is a reason to be very watchful.

Now, I don't expect the Liberal pussies to understand this within the United States.  I also don't expect the Liberal President and Democratic controlled Congress to do what is necessary.  However, I do expect them to keep Americans safe at all costs. 

It will prove to be very interesting on how this situation escalates and how this administration manages it?

Personally, I am hoping and praying for the best.  But my instincts tell me that enemies are not only plotting but are proving to be very emboldened.

- Doc





US, SKorea militaries gird for NKorean provocation



SEOUL, South Korea – The U.S. and South Korea put their military forces on high alert Thursday after North Korea renounced the truce keeping the peace between the two Koreas since 1953. The North also accused the U.S. of preparing to attack the isolated communist country in the wake of its second nuclear bomb test, and warned it would retaliate to any hostility with "merciless" and dangerous ferocity.

Seoul moved a 3,500-ton destroyer into waters near the Koreas' disputed western maritime border while smaller, high-speed vessels were keeping guard at the front line, South Korean news reports said. The defense ministry said the U.S. and South Korean militaries would increase surveillance activities.

Pyongyang, meanwhile, positioned artillery guns along the west coast on its side of the border, the Yonhap news agency said. The Joint Chiefs of Staffs in Seoul refused to confirm the reports.

The show of force along the heavily fortified border dividing the two Koreas comes three days after North Korea conducted an underground nuclear test and fired a series of short-range missiles.

The test drew immediate condemnation from world leaders and the U.N. Security Council, where ambassadors were discussing a new resolution to punish Pyongyang. President Barack Obama called it a "blatant violation" of international law.

In response, South Korea said it would join more than 90 nations that have agreed to stop and inspect vessels suspected of transporting weapons of mass destruction.

North Korea called South Korea's participation in the U.S.-led Proliferation Security Initiative a prelude to a naval blockade and a violation of the truce signed to end the three-year war that broke out in Korea in 1950.

On Wednesday Pyongyang renounced the 1953 armistice and the following day warned U.S. forces against advancing into its territory.

"The northward invasion scheme by the U.S. and the South Korean puppet regime has exceeded the alarming level," the North's main Rodong Sinmun newspaper said in a commentary carried by the official Korean Central News Agency. "A minor accidental skirmish can lead to a nuclear war."

The U.S., which has 28,500 troops in South Korea and another 50,000 in Japan, has denied it is planning military action. But U.S. and South Korean troops were placed on their highest alert level for more than two years.

The South Korea-U.S. combined forces command rates its surveillance alert on a scale to 5, with 1 being the highest level. On Thursday, the level was raised from 3 to 2, the second-highest level, South Korean Defense Ministry spokesman Won Tae-jae said. He said the last time the alert level was that high was in 2006, when the North conducted its first nuclear test.

Won said both militaries were raising their surveillance activities, although he would not explain what that meant. South Korean media reported that the higher alert would involve increased monitoring of North Korea using satellites and navy ships.

The U.N. Command on Korea said it would continue to observe the armistice, saying it "remains in force and is binding on all signatories, including North Korea."

North Korea has repudiated the armistice several times before, most recently in 2003 and 2006.

South Korean Foreign Ministry spokesman Moon Tae-young accused the North of "seriously distorting" the decision to join in the initiative.

Seoul has said its military would "respond sternly" to any North Korean provocation, and that it would be able to contain the North with the help of U.S. troops.

The South Korean military has dispatched "personnel and equipment deployment" along its land and sea borders, a Joint Chiefs of Staff officer said. He spoke on condition of anonymity citing department policy.

He said there has been no particular movement of North Korean troops in border areas.

The two Koreas technically remain at war because they signed a truce, not a peace treaty, in 1953. However, North disputes the U.N.-drawn maritime border off their west coast, and used that dispute to provoke deadly naval skirmishes in 1999 and 2002.

South Korea's mass-circulation JoongAng Ilbo newspaper said more anti-air missiles and artillery were dispatched to military bases on islands near the disputed western sea border with North Korea.

Yonhap said the destroyer has artillery guns, anti-ship guided missiles, ship-to-air missiles and torpedoes. Air force fighters are were on standby, the report said.

North Korea's West Sea fleet has 13 submarines and more than 360 vessels, Yonhap said.

The recent flurry of belligerence could reflect an effort by 67-year-old leader Kim Jong Il to boost his standing among his impoverished people.

It was also seen as a test of Obama's new administration, and came as two Americans, journalists Euna Lee and Laura Ling, remained in custody in Pyongyang accused of illegal entry and "hostile acts." They face trial in Pyongyang next week.

Japanese Prime Minister Taro Aso said any new Security Council resolution must be stronger than the one issued after the North's first atomic test in October 2006, and contain sanctions.

A Russian Foreign Ministry official said Moscow did not want to see Pyongyang further isolated. Andrei Nesterenko said Russia opposed sanctions but did not object to a U.N. resolution.

Hong Hyun-ik, a senior analyst at the Sejong Institute security think tank, said sanctions would not be effective unless China — North Korea's traditional ally — implemented them.

"Kim Jong Il must be scoffing" at the talk of sanctions, he said. "He knows the world will forget about any sanctions in the end."

___

Associated Press writers Hyung-jin Kim and Eric Talmadge in Seoul, and Mari Yamaguchi in Tokyo, contributed to this report.


May 8, 2009 - Friday 

Category: News and Politics
With the current crisis our Nation is going through, what better way is there to bring people together for the common cause of PRAYING for our Nation?

The Obama Administration is a disgrace to the Oval Office and to this great country!

I pity you fools that voted for and support what will prove to be the worst President in the History of the United States!

Thank you for once again bringing Jimmy Carter into my generation.  The problem is that this character is Carter to the 100th Degree!

- Doc



By Kristi Keck
CNN

(CNN) -- For the past eight years, the White House recognized the National Day of Prayer with a service in the East Room, but this year, President Obama decided against holding a public ceremony.

President Bush marked the National Day of Prayer with a service at the White House.

President Bush marked the National Day of Prayer with a service at the White House.

"Prayer is something that the president does everyday," White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday, noting that Obama will sign a proclamation to recognize the day, as many administrations in the past have done.

Asked if Obama thought his predecessor's ceremonies were politicized, Gibbs said, "No, I'm not going to get into that again.

"I think the president understands, in his own life and in his family's life, the role that prayer plays."

The National Day of Prayer is an annual observance for people of all faiths.

Under the Bush administration, the White House hosted an interfaith service each year, inviting protestant, Catholic and Jewish leaders for an event at the East Room.

President Ronald Reagan and President George H.W. Bush also marked the day with a White House observance.

President Harry Truman first established the day as a national event in 1952. Reagan signed a resolution in 1988 to observe the National Day of Prayer each year on the first Thursday in May, and each president since has recognized this day with a proclamation.

The National Day of Prayer Task Force, a privately funded organization that focuses on mobilizing the Christian community, says it's disappointed in this year's toned down observance, but other groups say the president needs to go a step farther -- and ignore the day altogether.

"It's not his job to tell people to pray," said David Silverman, national spokesperson for the organization American Atheists.

"We are very happy he did away with the George W. Bush-era celebrations and party, but we wish he wouldn't do it at all. ... When church and state are separate, separate is separate," he said.

Although there are no public events scheduled at the White House, representatives from the legislative and judicial branches are expected to attend an event the National Day of Prayer Task Force is holding on Capitol Hill.

But, despite numerous attempts to get a representative from the executive office to attend, "it doesn't appear they are going to fulfill our request," said Becky Armstrong, marketing and media manager of the National Day of Prayer Task Force.

"The White House is a small part of what the national day of prayer is all about. Tomorrow there will be dozens of events held in our nation's capitol and governors from all 50 states have already issued proclamations recognizing the National Day of Prayer," Armstrong said.

"It would be belittling to those millions of people to reduce this day to merely one event not being held at the White House."

Task Force Chairman Shirley Dobson said in a statement that she was disappointed in the "lack of participation" by the Obama administration, adding that "at this time in our country's history, we would hope our President would recognize more fully the importance of prayer."


May 5, 2009 - Tuesday 

Category: News and Politics
Although I agree with this analysis... McCain vs. Obama is like NIGHT and DAY!

On one hand, you have a Moderate and on the other, you have an EXTREME LEFT WING idiot who ran his entire campaign on emotional sentiments of "Yes We Can.."

I am still trying to figure out what the fuck "CAN" is all about with the Community Organizer who was absent more days on critical votes than present while he was a Jr. Senator.

However, the GAP is real in this article.   I feel it and am disgusted at the RINO's who forgot the Conservative Principles that make the core of the party!

We need GRASSROOTS Conservatives in office.  People who don't make their career out of politics.  We need Statesmen that helped make this country great.

Where are they today?

The article by Scott Rasmussen is a very interesting analogy that I belive hits on core points.

Let me know your thoughts?

- Doc






Is The Beltway GOP Irrelevant?

An Analysis By Scott Rasmussen



To be relevant in politics, you need either formal power or a lot of people willing to follow your lead. The governing Republicans in the nation’s capital have lost both on their continuing path to irrelevance.

The disconnect between D.C. Republicans and Republicans throughout the country has been growing for nearly 20 years, but it became more intense and noticeable during the waning years of the Bush administration.

Perhaps the final straw was the $700 billion bank bailout plan pushed through Congress last fall despite strong voter opposition. For all the furor unleashed this spring by congressional Republicans about President Obama’s $787 billion stimulus plan, the Bush-era bailouts last fall were approved with virtually no advance notice and no guidelines as to how the money would be spent. Looking back, most voters and nearly eight-out-of-10 Republicans now believe the bailouts were a bad idea.

The April 15 “tea party” protests, viewed favorably by 51% of Americans, were fueled as much by anger at the bailouts as anything else. Many Inside-the-Beltway Republicans chose to distance themselves from the events, and many tea party participants were happy to express their anger at both Beltway Republicans and Democrats.

The bailouts came on top of earlier doubts. Many Republicans had expressed concern about the growth of government spending throughout the Bush years. Then there was the immigration issue. On that topic, the Bush team championed a bill that was even less popular than the bailouts. Eventually, despite strong bipartisan support in Congress, the Senate surrendered to public opinion and failed to pass the Bush-backed reform. Beltway Republicans just didn't recognize the large gap between Mainstream American and the Political Class on this issue and assumed that those angry about it are angry at the immigrants. In fact, data shows that the anger is directed primarily at the federal government.

The disconnect between the Republican base and Beltway Republicans also can be seen in the recent history of presidential nominations. In the 2008 campaign, Barack Obama, the Democratic candidate, was seen by voters as more likely to deliver tax cuts than Republican nominee John McCain. By the way, Bill Clinton’s victories in the 1990s also followed a belief that he was more likely to deliver tax cuts than his GOP opponent. It’s hard to imagine how the party of Ronald Reagan could let that happen, but it did.

The trend began in 1988 when the first President Bush was elected on the strength of Reagan’s record. Once safely in office, Bush appeared to forget what it was he said after asking voters to read his lips, and he ended up governing with a fiscal policy that was more like Bill Clinton’s than Ronald Reagan’s. By 1992, the Republican share of the presidential vote fell to 37%, a 22-point decline from Reagan’s total eight years earlier.

In 1996, the GOP nominated Bob Dole, an honorable man and a capable legislator, but he was also a man famously described as having never met a tax he didn’t hike. Dole could only pick up 41% of the vote.

Then, in 2000, the second George Bush was nominated in large part on the strength of his inherited name recognition and network. While he learned from his father’s mistake about tax cuts, he was unable to connect that to a larger purpose. By the end of Bush’s second term, the war in Iraq had dragged down the GOP, and Beltway Republicans became identified as the party of big business. That’s not a good place to be when 70% of Americans view big business and big government on the same team working against the interests of consumers and investors.

The gap between Beltway Republicans and the Republican base is part of a wider gap between the Mainstream and the Political Class. On many issues, the gap between Mainstream Americans and the Political Class is bigger than the gap between Mainstream Republicans and Mainstream Democrats.

But Political Class Democrats control Congress and the White House while their GOP counterparts have little in the way of power and influence to overcome the disconnect with their base. One immediate result of this is that senior senators like Arlen Specter and John McCain now are facing primary challenges. Other challenges may follow. It used to be possible for Republicans in Washington to argue that they needed someone like Specter or McCain to hang on to the majority but no longer.

Look for the Republican Party to sink further into irrelevancy as long as its key players insist on hanging around Congress or K Street for their ideas. The future for the GOP is beyond the Beltway.



May 1, 2009 - Friday 

Category: News and Politics

While Biden tells his family to stay out of Airplanes and Subways, they tell the rest of America to do something different.

This whole Swine Flu SCARE is out of a control by a Jr. Administration that is feeling their way through on how to do things.   This is what happens when you elect a Jr. Senator to the Highest Office of the land who has never done anything but community organize uneducated weak minded people who have nothing in life but the words of a charismatic figure saying "Yes We Can"....

Maybe they should pick up a hobby or read a book instead of being motivated by FEELINGS. 

The old saying is that there are two quotients that need to be filled with people:  1) Intellectual Quotient & 2) Emotional Quotient.

Obama and his followers have filled the Emotional tank because that is all the idiots who vote for him and support him have going for them.

RAW EMOTION!!

But have no fear!

The mid term elections are coming up and for the first time in more than 5 years, the polls overwhelmingly show that voters will RATHER vote for Republicans than Democrats.



Generic Congressional Ballot -- Republicans Top Democrats on Generic Congressional Ballot



1/3 of the Senate and half the House will change with the mid term election.

Although Obama and the Dems are being slick to not raise taxes before that time, they are loosing momentum.

The days of Liberals are numbered and YES WE CAN take the Government back and put it on the right track.

This time, we will hold the Republicans to CONSERVATIVE STANDARDS of not spending out of control like the Liberals do.

Remember one thing people.... The Crescendo of where the Democrats and Liberals are going has been reached and there is only one way to go from here... that is down!

They will not even hold their current altitude.  Obama has the same ratings that President Bush had in his first 100 Days.

Nothing changed in Washington except for a Jr. Senator taking office and surrounding himself with a bunch of EXTREME LEFT WING idiots who tell their families to stay off Planes & Trains while telling the American People to do things differently.

This is POLITICS as usual and nothing but the same old bullshit in a different suit. 


A very EMPTY Suit at that!

- Doc






Biden tells family to stay off planes, subways



WASHINGTON – Joe Biden said Thursday he advised his family to stay off airplanes and subways because of the swine flu, a remark that forced the vice president's office to backtrack, the travel industry to cry foul and other government officials to try to massage Biden's message.

"I would tell members of my family — and I have — that I wouldn't go anywhere in confined places now," Biden said on NBC's "Today" show.

Biden, who has a reputation for off-the-cuff remarks, went beyond any precautions recommended by the federal government. In discussing his personal advice to his family, he said simply, "That's me."

Within two hours, Biden's office issued a statement backing off the remarks and suggesting he was talking about travel to Mexico.

"On the 'Today Show' this morning, the vice president was asked what he would tell a family member who was considering air travel to Mexico this week," said spokeswoman Elizabeth Alexander. "The advice he is giving family members is the same advice the administration is giving to all Americans: that they should avoid unnecessary air travel to and from Mexico. If they are sick, they should avoid airplanes and other confined public spaces, such as subways."

Biden, who has three grown children and five grandchildren, was asked whether he would advise his own family against flying to Mexico on a commercial flight.

"It's not just going to Mexico, if you're in a confined aircraft and one person sneezes it goes all the way through the aircraft," Biden said on NBC. "That's me. I would not be at this point, if they had another way of transportation, suggesting they ride the subway."

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends avoiding nonessential travel to Mexico. But it isn't recommending that people avoid other travel because of the swine flu.

The airline and travel industries were quick to criticize Biden's remarks.

James May, president of the Air Transport Association, which represents airlines, sent Biden a letter expressing "extreme disappointment at your suggestion that people should avoid air travel."

American Airlines spokesman Tim Smith declined to comment directly on the vice president's remarks, but said, "To suggest that people not fly at this stage of things is a broad brush stroke bordering on fear mongering."

U.S. Travel Association President Roger Dow urged the public to "heed the advice of medical experts" and gently chided the vice president without specifically mentioning him.

"Elected officials must strike a delicate balance of accurately and adequately informing citizens of health concerns without unduly discouraging travel and other important economic activity," Dow said in a statement.

Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano offered to rewrite Biden's words for him: "I think the vice president ... if he could say that over again, he would say if they're feeling sick, they should stay off of public transit or confined spaces because that is indeed the advice that we're giving," she said on MSNBC.

On Radio Iowa this morning, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, was less forgiving, calling it "a very unfortunate statement by the vice president."

During his decades as Delaware senator, Biden was a regular on Amtrak, riding the train from Wilmington to Washington.

Asked on NBC's "Today" show whether the U.S. government should close the border with Mexico, Biden said health authorities advise that would be impractical and noted the new flu is already in the U.S. and several other nations.

Instead, Biden said, the focus should be on slowing the spread of the virus through groups of people in close quarters, such as airplanes, malls, stadiums and classrooms.

"Closing the classroom and closing the border are two fundamentally different things," he said.


April 14, 2009 - Tuesday 

Category: News and Politics



OohRah!

Happy Easter!

- Doc


American Ship Captain Richard Phillips Rescued Safely From Somali Pirates





Sunday, April 12, 2009




An American ship
captain was rescued unharmed Sunday in a swift firefight that killed
three of the four Somali pirates who had been holding him for days in a
lifeboat off the coast of Africa, U.S. officials said.


Capt. Richard Phillips' crew, who said they escaped after he offered himself
to the pirates as a hostage, erupted in cheers aboard their ship docked
in Mombasa, Kenya. Some waved an American flag and fired a flare in
celebration.

A U.S. Defense official said Phillips was in "imminent danger" of being killed before the rescue.

The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet said Phillips was resting comfortably on a U.S. warship after receiving a medical exam.


President Barack Obama said Phillips had courage that was "a model for all Americans."

Obama said he was pleased that Phillips was rescued, adding that the United
States needs help from other countries to deal with the threat of
piracy and to hold pirates accountable.

The Navy said Phillips was freed at 7:19 p.m. local time. He was taken
aboard the Norfolk, Virginia-based USS Bainbridge and then flown to the
San Diego-based USS Boxer for the medial exam, 5th Fleet spokesman Lt.
Nathan Christensen said Christensen
said Phillips was now "resting comfortably." The USS Boxer was in the
Indian Ocean off the coast of Somalia, Christensen said.

The U.S. did not say if Phillips, 53, of Underhill, Vt., was receiving
medical care because he had been injured or if he was being treated for
exposure after his ordeal.

U.S. officials said a pirate who had been involved in negotiations to free Phillips
but who was not on the lifeboat during the rescue was in military
custody. FBI spokesman John Miller said that would change as the
situation became "more of a criminal issue than a military issue."

Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd said prosecutors were looking at
"evidence and other issues" to determine whether to bring a case in the
United States. The pirate could face a life sentence if convicted,
officials said.

Maersk Line Limited President and CEO John Reinhart said in a news release that the U.S. government informed the company around 1:30 p.m. EDT Sunday that Phillips had been rescued. Reinhart said the company called Phillips'
wife, Andrea, to tell her the news.When Phillips' crew heard
the news aboard their ship in the port of Mombasa, they placed an
American flag over the rail of the top of the Maersk Alabama and
whistled and pumped their fists in the air. Crew fired a bright red
flare into the sky from the ship.

"We made it!" said crewman ATM Reza, pumping his fist in the air.

"He managed to be in a 120-degree oven for days, it's amazing," said
another of about a dozen crew members who came out to talk to
reporters. He said the crew found out the captain was released because
one of the sailors had been talking to his wife on the phone.

Capt. Joseph Murphy, the father of second-in-command Shane Murphy, thanked Phillips for his bravery.

"Our prayers have been answered on this Easter Sunday. I have made it clear
throughout this terrible ordeal that my son and our family will forever
be indebted to Capt. Phillips for his bravery," Murphy said. "If not
for his incredible personal sacrifice, this kidnapping and act of
terror could have turned out much worse."

In the written statement, Murphy said both his family and Phillips' "can now celebrate a joyous Easter together."

Terry Aiken, 66, who lives across the street from the Phillips house, fought back tears as he reacted to the news.

"I'm very, very happy," Aiken said. "I can't be happier for him and his family."

A government official and others in Somalia with knowledge of the
situation had reported hours earlier that negotiations for Phillips'
release had broken down.

Talks to free him began Thursday with the captain of the USS Bainbridge talking to the pirates under instruction from FBI hostage negotiators on board the
U.S. destroyer. The pirates had threatened to kill Phillips if attacked.

Three U.S. warships were within easy reach of the lifeboat on Saturday. The
U.S. Navy had assumed the pirates would try to get their hostage to
shore, where they can hide him on Somalia's lawless soil and be in a
stronger position to negotiate a ransom.

Maersk Line said before news of the rescue broke that "the U.S. Navy had sight
contact" of Phillips — apparently when the pirates opened the hatches.

Before Phillips was freed, a pirate who said he was associated with the gang
that held Phillips, Ahmed Mohamed Nur, told The Associated Press that
the pirates had reported that "helicopters continue to fly over their
heads in the daylight and in the night they are under the focus of a
spotlight from a warship."

He spoke by satellite phone from Harardhere, a port and pirate stronghold where a fisherman said helicopters flew over the town Sunday morning and a
warship was looming on the horizon. The fisherman, Abdi Sheikh Muse,
said that could be an indication the lifeboat may be near to shore.

The district commissioner of the central Mudug region said talks went on
all day Saturday, with clan elders from his area talking by satellite
telephone and through a translator with Americans, but collapsed late
Saturday night.

"The negotiations between the elders and American officials have broken down. The reason is American officials wanted to arrest the pirates in Puntland and elders refused the arrest of the pirates," said the commissioner, Abdi Aziz Aw
Yusuf. He said he organized initial contacts between the elders and the
Americans.

Two other Somalis, one involved in the negotiations and another in contact with the pirates, also said the talks collapsed because of the U.S. insistence that the pirates be arrested and brought to justice.

Phillips' crew of 19 American sailors reached safe harbor in Kenya's northeast
port of Mombasa on Saturday night under guard of U.S. Navy Seals,
exhilarated by their freedom but mourning the absence of Phillips.

Crew members said their ordeal had begun with the Somali pirates hauling
themselves up from a small boat bobbing on the surface of the Indian
Ocean far below.

As the pirates shot in the air, Phillips told his crew to lock themselves in a cabin and surrendered himself to safeguard his men, crew members said.

Phillips was then held hostage in an enclosed lifeboat that was closely watched
by U.S. warships and a helicopter in an increasingly tense standoff. On
Friday, the French navy freed a sailboat seized off Somalia last week
by other pirates, but one of the five hostages was killed.

Phillips jumped out of the lifeboat Friday and tried to swim for his freedom but
was recaptured when a pirate fired an automatic weapon at or near him,
according to U.S. Defense Department officials speaking on condition of
anonymity because they are not authorized to talk about the unfolding
operations.

Early Saturday, the pirates holding Phillips in the lifeboat fired a few shots at a small U.S. Navy vessel that had approached, a U.S. military official said on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter
publicly.

The official said the U.S. sailors did not return fire, the Navy vessel turned away and no one was hurt. He said the vessel had not been attempting a rescue. The pirates are believed armed with pistols and AK-47 assault rifles.

"When I spoke to the crew, they won't consider it done when they board a
plane and come home," Maersk President John Reinhart said from Norfolk,
Virginia before news of Phillips' rescue. "They won't consider it done
until the captain is back, nor will we."

In Phillips' hometown, the Rev. Charles Danielson of the St. Thomas Church
said before the news broke that the congregation would continue to pray
for Phillips and his family, who are members, and he would encourage
"people to find hope in the triumph of good over evil."

Reinhart said he spoke with Phillips' wife, who is surrounded by family and two company employees who were sent to support her.

"She's a brave woman," Reinhart said. "And she has one favor to ask: 'Do what
you have to do to bring Richard home safely.' That means don't make a
mistake, folks. We have to be perfect in our execution."



April 12, 2009 - Sunday 

Category: News and Politics

YOU HAVE BEEN RECRUITED!




STEP:

1) We Organize

2) We make our voice heard

3) Only for members to know

This is your country people and the time to stand and act is NOW!

- Doc








April 10, 2009 - Friday 

Category: News and Politics



WHERE ARE THE DUMB FUCKING LIBERAL LOUD MOUTHS CALLING THIS OUT???



Welcome to the SSA - Socialized States of America!  America will be no different than Europe after Obama and the modern day Democrats!

- Doc





KNOWLEDGE IS POWER!  BE NOT DECEIVED!




FOX Forum

April 6th, 2009 4:15 PM Eastern Democrats’ Top Five Budget Tricks and Gimmicks

Policy Director

Congressional Democrats reacted to the shocking scope of President Obama’s
plan to spend $3.6 trillion next year in his budget (and a stunning $42.2
trillion over ten years)
the way Washington insiders usually do — they turned to
tricks and gimmicks.
  They “trimmed” his budget and got it down to $3.0 trillion
for next year and about $15 trillion over five years without actually cutting
any spending.  Strip off the gimmicks, however, and the Congressional budgets
still look almost exactly like the president’s budget.  Here are the top 5
tricks they used to do it:
5. Hiding Years 6 Through 10

President Obama criticized Bush for not following
the practice of the Clinton years of doing 10-year budgeting, opting instead for
shorter 5-year budgets.  The White House made the case that showing longer-term
obligations was important given the enormity of the country’s fiscal
challenges.  Congressional Democrats, however, decided that the quickest and
easiest way to conceal a huge portion of the Obama budget from the public was to
simply shorten it to 5 years, hiding some of the biggest big ticket items in the
secret second 5 years.
4. A Hidden Wall Street Bailout

President Obama included $250 billion in
additional Wall Street bailouts in his budget (a bit of a budget trick in itself
— since it assumes that $750 billion in assets would be purchased that could
later be sold for $500 billion).  Both the House and Senate budget resolutions
failed to show any funding for the almost certain new rounds of Wall Street
bailouts, despite the fact that Treasury Secretary Geithner has already
announced an expanded plan, and the Washington-Wall Street bailout machine shows
no signs of slowing down.  Future bailouts could cost hundreds of billions or
trillions of dollars, making a budget that fails to include them an extreme
low-ball.
3. Hidden Tax Hikes

The Senate and House both pretend that the Making
Work Pay tax credit — Obama’s big campaign promise, originally a $500 per worker
credit that’s since been trimmed to $400 — will expire after 2010 (House) or
2012 (Senate).  Obama would pay for those so-called tax cuts (more than 42
percent, according to the White House which would take the form of checks to
non-income tax payers) through revenues from his cap-and-trade energy tax.

Cap-and-trade is
included in the Congressional budgets but there is no word about how high the
tax hike would be.  In fact, the Congressional budgets claim, unbelievably, that
this tax would be “revenue-neutral.”  Congress also pretends that the
Alternative Minimum Tax will be allowed to slam the middle class, providing only
for a 1-year fix, despite the White House insistence that there be a permanent
reform.  Even the 1-year cost, though, is hidden from the deficit total through
a reserve fund.
2. Secret Reserve Funds

Speaking of reserve funds, lots of them are being
used to hide a wide variety of tax hikes and policy changes that would
substantially change the overall budget numbers — making them look like the
original Obama budget — it they were properly accounted for.  The House has 17
reserve funds and the Senate 15, most of which claim to be deficit-neutral
without any explanation of how substantial tax cuts and spending increases could
be done in a deficit-neutral fashion without big tax hikes.  One reserve fund
that does have an associated funding level is the Medicare reserve fund that
would increase mandatory spending $285 billion over 10 years-on top of the
reported total numbers for spending and deficits.  These reserve funds serve no
purpose other than to avoid accountability and transparency, and make the budget
look a lot smaller than it really is.
1. Using the Reconciliation Trick for Health Care

This is by far the worst and most dangerous trick
in the budget.  Earlier
this year I wrote here in the FOX Forum
that the cap-and-trade energy tax
could potentially be forced through Congress in budget reconciliation, a trick
to avoid proper debate and the normal 60 vote requirement for important
legislation.  Fortunately, last week Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska introduced a
budget amendment to prohibit the use of reconciliation for cap-and-trade, and it
passed
on a solid 67-31 vote
. Every Republican supported the amendment, as did 26
Democrats.  Unfortunately, Democrats are still poised to pull the same
reconciliation trick for their plan to nationalize and ration health care.

While the Senate passed a budget resolution
without reconciliation language, the House budget specifically includes a
section authorizing the use of reconciliation for a national health care plan. 
This is despite the fact that reconciliation only matters in the Senate, where
it can short-circuit debate and pass legislation with only 50 votes instead of
the regular sixty.  This sets up a conference committee where Senate
reconciliation instructions can be inserted and railroaded through, despite the
fact that the Senate already rejected this approach.
The country deserves an honest, public discussion of where we’re going on
issues like health care, energy, taxes, and spending.  Unfortunately we have a
Congress whose budget is a big bag of tricks and gimmicks to hide its true cost
and to slip major policy changes in through the back door.
Phil Kerpen is director of policy for Americans for
Prosperity.






WHERE ARE THE DUMB FUCKING LIBERAL LOUD MOUTHS CALLING THIS OUT???







April 7, 2009 - Tuesday 

Category: News and Politics




PEOPLE!!

You need to be aware of what is going on in your generation and before your eyes!  These are perilous times we live in.  These are not normal times.  We are going through CHANGE but it is not the definitive change you think of for the good.

There are elements of power in place that want to wield control over you and stifle your prosperity to second or third class citizens.

Our Nation based on prosperity and freedom is becoming more and more like Socialized Europe.  For those of you who say, “What is wrong with socialized Europe?” This blog is not for you.  For those of you who say, “We need to have more Government control in the form of Nationalized Banks or Government sponsored health care.”   This blog is not for you.

This blog is for those Freedom Lovers who have Red, White and Blue running through their veins.  This blog is for those of you who understand what the Government’s place should be and don’t need the Government to hold your hand.  Nor do you want it to.

What happens when a company, house or nation runs out of money?    They do what is called DISSOLVE!

This is where our nation is heading.  We are heading toward bankruptcy and dissolvement.   What will happen when we can no longer afford to pay for our military?  Borrow more from other countries? Print more money and further weaken the dollar?   Just that premise alone spells disaster.

The greatest offense is a good defense.  If America goes broke and cannot afford their MIGHT of MILITARY STRENGTH.  Then, that gives the flag and green light to our enemies to become emboldened to STRIKE America!  The taxes are going to be raised so high on things that you will no longer be able to afford anything.

Have you people looked at or experience the tax hikes to date from the Obama Administration and Democratic Controlled Congress with less than 3 months in office?





It is only going to get worse!


You have the power to stop this!   You must relentlessly write to your representatives, call their office and complain about the BAIL OUTS and HIGH TAXES EVERY SINGLE DAY!  Just as you must eat every day, you are to call them and write to them EVERY SINGLE DAY!   You must be a “thorn in their flesh”!   Then when voting time comes around, you MUST VOTE FOR FISCALLY SOUND PEOPLE!

I don’t give a shit if they call themselves the Yellow Party.  If they have:

1)    MORAL FIBER
2)    FISCAL CONSERVATISM
3)    BELIEVE IN STRONG MILITARY DEFENSE

Then support them.   You “THE PEOPLE” still have the power of your vote to make a difference and you can do it with the above very simple plan.

Who will join me in WRITING & CALLING YOUR REPRESENTATIVES RELENTLESSLY TO HAVE PROPER REPRESENTATION!?

WE THE PEOPLE still have the power, if we SPEAK WITH ONE VOICE!

The time act is NOW!

- Doc


April 4, 2009 - Saturday 

Category: News and Politics




Well, well, well...

Fiscal Conservatives said that throwing money at GM was just to keep the lights on for a few days.   You cannot put NEW WINE into OLD WINE SKINS!

But what did you dumb fucking liberal jerk-offs say?

We need to give money to GM and bail them out.  They are to big to fail! 

If anybody had any sense in Washington, they would have allowed GM to file bankruptcy from the beginning and then reorganize themselves without the rip-off unions.


So, now where did those BILLIONS and BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars in tax payer money go over the past couple of months?!?!

You fucking morons who preach and push for this bail out shit should be lined up in the streets and pissed on!

I will gladly piss on you fuckers myself because I am looking forward to a civil war to cleanse this Nation from you cancerous pathological deviants who are crippling this Nation.

What do you have to say now, you fucking morons?  Now that your savior is stating that bankruptcy is the best option?

I guess the stock market really loves what Obamanation has to say as well.  The more Obama talks, it just keeps getting lower and lower and lower.

Pat yourselves on the back!

- Doc




Obama has decided bankruptcy best for GM: report


..




SINGAPORE (Reuters) –
President Barack Obama has determined that a prepackaged bankruptcy is the best way for General Motors Corp to restructure and become a competitive automaker, Bloomberg reported, quoting people familiar with the matter.

Obama also is prepared to let Chrysler LLC
go bankrupt and be sold off piecemeal if the third-largest U.S.
automaker can't form an alliance with Fiat SpA, Bloomberg said, citing members of Congress who have been briefed on the subject and two other people familiar with the administration's deliberations.

U.S. stock futures slid on Wednesday on the report, with S&P
futures down 1.5 percent, while the dollar and the euro fell against
the yen, abruptly reversing earlier gains.

But a senior Obama administration official said the report was not
accurate and that the president's thinking on the situation had not
changed since Monday.

Obama on Monday gave GM 60 days to come up with deeper cost and debt
reductions than the biggest U.S. automaker had proposed in a viability
plan submitted last month.

But a "quick and surgical" bankruptcy the Obama administration
described as an option appears to be inevitable, the people familiar
with the matter said in the Bloomberg report.

Automakers around the world have seen sales plummet as recession-wary
consumers cut back on spending, forcing them to cut production and lay
off workers.

GM will close more U.S. plants and cut more jobs and still faces a
higher probability of bankruptcy to shed debt, new GM Chief Executive
Fritz Henderson said on Tuesday.

A possible bankruptcy plan being discussed for GM includes quickly
forming a new company of the automaker's most profitable parts, while a
group of other units would remain under bankruptcy protection for a
longer period, a source familiar with the plans told Reuters on Tuesday.

But analysts say the risk is that any bankruptcy could be somehow
derailed, or drag on for months or years, hurting stock holders,
creditors and workers, and causing more uncertainty for financial
markets and the sputtering U.S. economy.

While the automakers would still prefer to avoid bankruptcy, advisers
to both GM and Chrysler LLC have been working to prepare for potential
bankruptcy filings that would aim to preserve, or sell off, the best
parts of the companies.

"Our focus is on accelerating the speed of our operational
restructuring and reducing liabilities and debt on the balance sheet,"
Bloomberg quoted GM spokeswoman Renee Rashid-Merem as saying in an
e-mail.

"GM will take whatever steps are necessary to successfully restructure our company."

Chrysler spokesman Todd Goyer didn't immediately comment.


April 2, 2009 - Thursday 

Category: News and Politics





Does anyone really feel like you are being represented by your elected officials?

I know I sure and hell DON'T!

- Doc





April 1, 2009 - Wednesday 

Category: News and Politics


I would like to thank Wife of Former MARINE for posting this video on my Government 101 Blog.

This video is the essence, motivation and cause that we all fight for and defend.  It is the most important video you will ever watch in your life, if you claim to care about the status of government and the future for your family and children.

All AMERICANS and Freedom Loving people need to watch this video!

After you watch it, I would like you to share what your thoughts and feelings are?

- Doc




Here is the URL:

http://www.wimp.com/thegovernment/


CLICK HERE





March 22, 2009 - Sunday 

Category: News and Politics



Iran's supreme leader dismisses Obama overtures

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer Ali Akbar Dareini, Associated Press Writer
24 mins ago


Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to his supporters during his
AP – Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei waves to his supporters during his visit to Mashhad, 900



TEHRAN, Iran – Iran's supreme leader rebuffed President Barack Obama's latest outreach on Saturday, saying Tehran was still waiting to see concrete changes in U.S. policy.
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei
was responding to a video message Obama released Friday in which he
reached out to Iran on the occasion of Nowruz, the Persian new year,
and expressed hopes for an improvement in nearly 30 years of strained
relations.
Khamenei holds the last word on
major policy decisions, and how Iran ultimately responds to any
concrete U.S. effort to engage the country will depend largely on his
say.
In his most direct assessment of Obama and
prospects for better ties, Khamenei said there will be no change
between the two countries unless the American president puts an end to
U.S. hostility toward Iran and brings "real changes" in foreign policy.
"They
chant the slogan of change but no change is seen in practice. We
haven't seen any change," Khamenei said in a speech before a crowd of
tens of thousands in the northeastern holy city of Mashhad.
In
his video message, Obama said the United States wants to engage Iran,
but he also warned that a right place for Iran in the international
community "cannot be reached through terror or arms, but rather through
peaceful actions that demonstrate the true greatness of the Iranian
people and civilization."
Khamenei asked how
Obama could congratulate Iranians on the new year and accuse the
country of supporting terrorism and seeking nuclear weapons in the same
message.
Khamenei said there has been no change even in Obama's language compared to that of his predecessor.
"He (Obama) insulted the Islamic Republic
of Iran from the first day. If you are right that change has come,
where is that change? What is the sign of that change? Make it clear
for us what has changed."
Still, Khamenei left the door open to better ties with America, saying "should you change, our behavior will change too."
Diplomatic
ties between the U.S. and Iran were cut after the U.S. Embassy
hostage-taking after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, which toppled the
pro-U.S. shah and brought to power a government of Islamic clerics.
The
United States cooperated with Iran in late 2001 and 2002 in the
Afghanistan conflict, but the promising contacts fizzled — and were
extinguished completely when Bush branded Tehran part of the "Axis of
Evil."
Khamenei enumerated a long list of
Iranian grievances against the United States over the past 30 years and
said the U.S. was still interfering in Iranian affairs.
He mentioned U.S. sanctions against Iran,
U.S. support for Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during his 1980-88 war
against Iran and the downing of an Iranian airliner over the Persian
Gulf in 1988.
He also accused the U.S. of
provoking ethnic tension in Iran and said Washington's accusations that
Iran is seeking nuclear weapons are a sign of U.S. hostility. Iran says
its nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes, like energy
production, not for building weapons.
"Have you
released Iranian assets? Have you lifted oppressive sanctions? Have you
given up mudslinging and making accusations against the great Iranian
nation and its officials? Have you given up your unconditional support
for the Zionist regime? Even the language remains unchanged," Khamenei
said.
Khamenei, wearing a black turban and dark
robes, said America was hated around the world for its arrogance, as
the crowd chanted "Death to America."
Prominent
political analyst Saeed Leilaz said Khamenei's comments did not amount
to a rejection of better ties with the Obama administration. Rather,
Iran's current hard-line leaders need to publicly maintain some degree
of anti-U.S. rhetoric to bolster their own position, especially with
their conservative base, he said.
"Iran's ruling Islamic establishment needs to lessen tensions
with the U.S. and at the same time maintain a controlled animosity with
Washington," he said. "Iran can't praise Obama all of a sudden."
Khamenei will also likely stand his ground as long as he
remains concerned about the United States' ability to destabilize Iran,
he said.
For its part, the Obama administration must take practical
steps such as lifting a ban on selling Iran spare parts for passenger
aircraft or considering unfreezing Iranian assets in the U.S., Leilaz
said.

Obama has signaled a willingness to speak directly with Iran about its nuclear program and hostility toward Israel, a key U.S. ally.
At his inauguration last month, the president said his administration
would reach out to rival states, declaring "we will extend a hand if
you are willing to unclench your fist."
"They say we have stretched a hand toward Iran. ... If a hand
is stretched covered with a velvet glove but it is cast iron inside,
that makes no sense," Khamenei said.