MySpace


Fred Hembeck



Last Updated: 5/21/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 56
Sign: Aquarius

City: Upstate
State: NEW YORK
Country: US
Signup Date: 4/23/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Thursday, June 18, 2009 
Haven't been around these parts much lately. Sorry, folks. Guess you can blame some of that on daughter Julie being home and demanding a lot of my time, time I'm happy (mostly) to give. You know what they say about people on their deathbeds--they all wish they'd've spent more time with their families. As of yet, there are no recorded instances of someone's last words being. "I wish I'd blogged more!..."

That said, let's just briefly run down some of the things that have occurred in the Hembeck household these last few weeks, shall we?

Went to see "I Love You, Man", the funniest film I've seen in a long, long time, and the only one in recent times, aside from "Forgetting Sarah Marshall", that made me laugh out loud consistently throughout (usually, I'm good for a chuckle or two, and some smiles, tops, when I see a comedy). With all due respect to Paul Rudd, I give the lion's share of credit to Jason Segel, Rudd's costar in the former, and the star--and writer--of the latter. The funniest man on screen today, to my way of thinking, and my favorite of all the "Freaks and Geeks" alums. His Lou Ferrigno impression while Rudd's on the phone was merely one of the flick's hilarious highlights!!

Spent an afternoon watching nearly two hours of firetrucks from various fire companies, both near and far, parade up a local street in celebration of the 60th anniversary of our local fire department. Went back later that night to watch a great firework's show.

The next day, with Julie, I climbed my first mountain. Not the kind where you need ropes or equipment, but still fairly steep at the precipice. Nifty view of the Hudson River up top. Coming down, we ran into a young British fellow carrying his bike on his shoulder--apparently, he thought he'd be able to access the path via peddling. He wasn't--he passed us on the way down, never having reached the summit. Maybe next time a unicycle?...

I've read the second (and final) volume of the Human Torch Marvel Masterworks, Fantagraphics Blazing Combat collection, and the sumptuously oversized Best of Simon and Kirby compendium, absolute delights, each and every one!! Y'know, Bob Powell sure had one odd stint at Marvel during the sixties (see also, Giant-Man Marvel Masterworks, volume two)...

Julie's friend Cara brought over her Beatles version of Monopoly for a sleep-over a few weeks back, which I thought was pretty neat, seeing as how (yes, believe it or not) I don't own one. However, it launched Julie onto a Monopoly playing frenzy, a game which is fun to play, oh, once every few years, and maybe tolerable once every few months--but every few DAYS? Yeesh. She's roped me in several times, but I'm gonna take a pass until her boyfriend Alec comes down to visit next month--I need a break. Luckily, for my sanity and hers, she can play the game online with equally enthusiastic strangers...

There's been a recent rash of unexpected contact with folks I went to college with, to high school with, and even grade school with!! Some very interesting back stories included with these surprise emails, but nothing I'm prepared to share with you here. Think I'll save it for my memoirs. (wait a second--isn't THIS my memoirs?...)

Watched this episode of The Outer Limits on YouTube. Martin Landau sure does sell this creaky old sci-fi chestnut--and hey, who knew Shirley Knight was such a cutie back in the day?

Did the usual drudge work to get the pool into shape for swimming, and then didn't swim. This has got to be the rainiest, coolest June in recent memory around these parts. You'd think that by June 17th, you could leave your windows open at night. You'd think that, but you'd be wrong.

I endured this past weekend's annual Mets/Yankees match-up at The New House Ruth Financed. Yanks take two of three, with the first game going the Bombers way thanks to Luis Castillo's already infamous dropped pop-fly at second in the bottom of the ninth with two outs, thrusting victory into the arms of a stunned Yankee team 9-8, as two men score, down 8-7 only seconds earlier. And then watching ace Johan Santana having the worst start of his career, eventually losing 15-0 on Sunday. But at least journeyman Fernando Nieve, as an emergency fill-in for ailing John Maine, stopped the pinstripers, 6-2, in the middle game. And, along with rookie outfielder Fernando Martinez and super-sub Fernando Tatis playing first, set a major league record--the first time three players named Fernando had ever played in the same game, much less been in the starting line-up together! As there have only been 13 other players named Fernando in all of MLB history, I'd say that's quite an accomplishment. Hey, I'm a Mets fan--I gotta find SOMETHING to cheer about!...


Julie and I watched all 13 episodes of "Wonder Falls" on DVD, a terrific little TV show that Fox axed after four episodes a few years back. I caught two of 'em at the time, and then picked up the DVD when it came out, but never quite got around to watching it. I'm glad Julie finally goaded me into doing so, as it has to qualify as one of the most inventive and entertaining shows ever to grace a television screen. Netflix it--you won't be disappointed (Julie's already seen the first episode three times, playing it for various friends, who've responded just as enthusiastically).
Oh, and in case you don't know the basic premise, it's about a semi-hostile 24 year old retail clerk at a Niagara Falls souvenir shop who starts receiving unwanted cryptic advice from various inanimate animals, such as Teddy bears and wax lions! Sounds crazy, huh? But it works, oh yes, it most surely does. But hey, don't take MY word for it--see for yourself!!...

Currently, we're making our way through the first season of "The Office" (American version). I've seen them before, Julie hasn't, but I'm especially enjoying all the deleted scenes that are entirely fresh to me.

Dug out a tape which had "Galaxy Quest" on it, watched it with Lynn. A pleasant, smile-worthy comedy. No Jason Segel anywhere in sight, tho....

Then there's Der Bingle. Alan Plessinger pointed me towards this link on YouTube for "The Country Girl", a film which featured an Oscar winning performance from co-star Grace Kelly (and a nom nod to Crosby, who lost out to a fellow named Brando). This was one of those flicks that I'd heard about repeatedly ever since I was a kid, but still knew very little about. Yes, I knew Bing played an alcoholic, yes, I knew hs character was married to Grace Kelly, and yes, I knew about the various Academy Awards it garnered. But I thought it took place in the country, and since it was a drama, that there wasn't any music. Wrong on both counts--Bing plays a washed-up singer getting one last chance to headline a Broadway show thanks to the play's director, William Holden. Man, can Bing ACT!! He really surprised me, effortlessly falling into a haunted gaze whenever the script warranted it--which was often. Conversely, Kelly seems a bit stiff, not nearly as natural as Crosby, and many of the script's attitudes seem outmoded today (particularly Holden's regarding Kelly). The movie is nonetheless engrossing and worth seeing simply for the old crooner's performance.

I was thus prompted to dig out an unwatched TCM VHS tape featuring several of Crosby's films, beginning with "Going Hollywood", a 1933 flick made 21 years before the previously discussed movie. I found this notable because I'd never seen top-billed Marion Davies, one time gal pal to William Randolph Hearst, in anything but "Citizen Kane" documentaries before. Not a horrible talent, but clearly not a great one, either.But hey, here's a truly unique trivia note--there's no mistaking Sterling Holloway in an early scene as a sound technician despite the fact that he utters but only a single word with that distinctive voice of his, but it took me a trip over to imdb to figure out who the familiar sounding--but unfamiliar looking--actor was playing the part of the casting director. Turns out it was a young Phil Tead, who, twenty some odd years later would play Professor Pepperwinkle in six episodes of "The Adventures of Superman", taking over in spirit for Holloway, who portrayed a similar (if variously named) character three times earlier during the run of the George Reeves starrer!! BOTH crackpot professors in one movie!! Wow! Well, I was impressed anyway...

Lastly, I should mention that the 7th issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN FAMILY was scheduled to be released to comics stores today, featuring my "Petey" story guest-starring the Drumm Brothers, the eventual Sorcerer Supreme of the Marvel Universe (at least, that's what my spies tell me. I've also heard that Captain America is alive!! ALIVE!! Gosh, whoda thot?...). I certainly hope a few of you pick up the issue and enjoy the story. And it looks as if there'll be another "Petey" episode coming along soon!! Yay!

Now, if I could just untangle myself from that nasty Marvin Gardens housing scandal and get down to work on it...
Thursday, May 28, 2009 

Current mood:  animated
Where's There's Hope, Part Two

Dolores Hope, widow of the legendary Bob Hope, celebrated her one hundredth birthday today, six years after her husband had previously reached the century mark on his own (passing away under just slightly two months later).

We here at Hembeck.com salute this remarkable achievement, one that no doubt has the four Hope children singing, "Thanks For The Memories--AND The DNA!!"...

(Well, maybe if they weren't all adopted it would, but hey, I wanna tell ya...)

Hall of Infamy

One of the most unforgettable experiences of my life was a watching a movie called "The Sadist" with my mom when I was eleven years old.

(Well, sure--how could it NOT be?...)

The year was 1964. As sometimes happened, I found myself sitting in the same room as my mom as she channel surfed while I paid scant attention, instead focused intently on my comic book de jour. Usually she'd catch a late night "Perry Mason" rerun or an old Hollywood chestnut, and the action up on the screen would barely make an impression on yours truly.

But somehow, this night was different.

Maybe it was seeing the name Arch Hall, Jr. in the credits--hey, wasn't he the guy from "Eegah!" (with Richard Kiel in the non-Geico caveman title role) and "Wild Guitar"? Those movies were fun--maybe this one would be too.

Boy, was I ever wrong THERE!

I don't think I even knew what a sadist was going into this movie, but I sure did afterwards. The plot is simple: three schoolteachers, two male, one female, are on their way to see a game at Dodger Stadium when some minor car trouble diverts them to an out of the way gas station in search of help, but instead have the extreme bad fortune to stumble across Charlie Tibbs (Hall) and his teen-aged girlfriend, Judy (Marilyn Manning). The psychopathic Tibbs had already killed several innocent people before making his initial screen entrance, and it's very quickly established that he has absolutely no compunction about adding these three to his grim total.

The remainder of the film plays out largely in real time, a nerve-wracking game of cat and mouse (with, as expected, the cat winning more often than the mouse). Hall's performance may appear cartoonish at times, but it's that very quality that makes it so thoroughly effective as a portrayal of a man totally devoid of empathy for other human beings. The film is harrowing, brutal, and absolutely unforgettable--especially if you're eleven years old and watching it in the company of your mother!!

I don't recall what I may've said to mom when the end credits mercifully filled the screen--I probably mumbled a few vaguely non-committal comments, not wanting to let on just how shook up I was--but from that moment on, I was curious to see it again, just to make sure I actually saw what I saw!!

It never played on TV again.

Well, at least not in my area. And believe me, I checked--each week, when we got the latest issue of the TV Guide, I'd read through the listing of that week's upcoming movies (remember when TV Guide actually had helpful features like that?...), always to no avail. Except for a single capsule review nestled away in an issue of CASTLE OF FRANKENSTEIN, I never saw any reference whatsoever to the movie in print. But I sure never forgot it, and one of the first things I did when I dove headfirst into surfing the net about a decade back was Google it.

Seems as if it made an impression on OTHER folks as well, and is now considered something of an overlooked classic. And NOT--trust me--one of those "so bad it's good" type classics (despite some of the ripeness of Hall's acting). This movie still packs a jolt. I know--thanks to it being issued as one of those cheap, public domain type DVDs awhile back, I finally watched it a second time a few years back, and it STILL left me drained afterwards.

Ten years after "The Sadist" first hit the drive-ins in 1963, a movie called "Badlands' was released to great critical acclaim, starring a young Martin Sheen and an even younger Sissy Spacek. Like "The Sadist", the scenario and the characters were suggested by the real life killing spree Charlie Starkweather and his high-school aged girl friend, Caril-Ann Fugate, embarked on in 1958. I saw "Badlands" back when it originally came out--not since--and remember it as a well-done flick, but, despite the obvious violence included in the story's course, nowhere near as disturbing as the Arch Hall Jr. version. The approach here was to get somewhat into the heads of Sheen and Spacek. You NEVER get into the head of Hall's character--you just wanted to get AWAY from him!

Aside from the classic monster flicks of the thirties and forties--and the cheesy sci-fi of the fifties--I'd hardly call myself a horror movie fan. My familiarity with modern day cinematic terror is pretty much limited to "Psycho", the original "Night Of The Living Dead", the first "Halloween", "The Exorcist", and "Alien"--never witnessed a chainsaw massacre, visited Elm Street or the last house on the left, or wandered into the theater on Friday the 13th, so I may not be one to judge, but for my money, "The Sadist" is the most frightening film I've ever seen. Because there's absolutely nothing in it that's unbelievable--given the right circumstances, it could play out all too easily in real life. Never has a movie set almost entirely outdoors seemed so claustrophobic, the so-called wide open spaces providing almost no chance for escape.

Four decades went by between my pair of viewings. A little over ninety minutes pass for the hapless trio who innocently set out to see a ballgame on a warm sunny day in California. In the intervening years, I'd naturally forgotten some of the film's specific details, but what I never forgot was the ironic juxtaposition found in the final scene that hammers home the palpable sense of senseless loss which, in the end, is what this film is all about.

And after hearing me go on and on about " The Feel Bad Flick of 1963", if there are still a few of you out there who'd like to actually see it for yourselves--well, you're in luck (sorta...)! You CAN, as just the other day I noticed that YouTube has recently posted it for your viewing unenjoyment on their official full-length movie page (as well as a pair of other, campier Arch Hall, Jr. classics, both of whose links I include simply as the relief you'll no doubt eventually crave from the unrelentingly grim nature of "The Sadist")!

Here they are...

"The Sadist"(1:32)

"Eegah!"(1:30)

"Wild Guitar"(1:34)

Like I said, while this sure ain't a happy movie, and though there's virtually no onscreen blood or gore spilled, it's not an easy movie to watch--or to turn away from once you begin.

Hey, even mom would have to agree--it sure was a lot more horrifying than your run-of-the-mill episode of "Perry Mason", that's for certain!!...
Currently listening:
Chicago II (Repackaged)
By Chicago
Release date: 2002-07-16
Friday, May 22, 2009 
Before I get down to wheeling and dealing today's ten new illos, I'd like to make a few publishing announcements and offer a few links of personal interest.

First off, I've been informed by several readers out there that the 50th issue of CAPTAIN AMERICA with my two page tribute to the Sentinel of Liberty (colored ever so niftily by Chris Giarusso--I've seen scans, if not the actual comic) hit the stands this very week!! It may be only a scant pair of pages, but remember--one Hembeck page promises double (and sometimes triple) the reading enjoyment of most other scribe's single pages, so if you're so inclined, I suggest you seek it out, and I sure do hope you like it!! (And if you do, TELL someone! Like, hmm, maybe Tom Brevoort?...)

I'm doubly delighted to report that my ten page "Petey" epic, "Loa and Order", guest starring the Drumm brothers, is scheduled to appear in the very next issue of AMAZING SPIDER-MAN FAMILY, number seven, out in one short month!! Again, while there are high hopes and tentative plans for more such stories (you DO want to witness young Petey Parker's first meeting with Johnny Storm, don't you?...), it wouldn't hurt my chances any if you'd drop a line saying as much to one of the Mighty Marvel Big-Wigs!!

Beyond that, I'd like to take a second to officially congratulate my buddy, Roger Green, and his lovely missus, Carol, on chalking up a full decade of marriage--to each other, even!! This notable event took place last week whilst I was off-line and visiting--oddly enough--the honeymoon capital of the world, Niagara Falls!! Significant of nothing, I suppose, both worth a mention just the same!! In any event, big-time congrats to both Roger and Carol--and as long as you two stay clear of Angelina Jolie, I'm sure everything will be fine!...

Then there's my OTHER old buddy, Rocco Nigro, who's finally joined the internet revolution with a blog of his own, "On The Rocs"! He's just getting started up, but you can still go check out some of his intriguingly surrealistic art, as well as a review of that recently published collection of Golden Age Boody Rogers stories!! Nice job, fella--now we just need to get you on Facebook where you can mingle with the likes of yours truly and the faux Bob Crumb...

Well, that brings our pre-commercial commercial announcements to an end--now, LET THERE BE ART!! (Um, but you'll have to go over to today's Fred Sez blog entry to see it...)
Thursday, May 21, 2009 
Lucky Seven?

I've been remiss. Below you'll find my seven most recent Fred Sez blog entries (save for a few featuring new Hembeck illos and one focusing on some ridiculous Rawhide Kid panels--use the link if you're curious, and scroll down). I'll try to not get so far behind again. In the meantime, if you haven't read these before, enjoy...

Boris, Boris, Boris!! (..And A Pair Of Belas...)


Well, I finished watching the other three Boris Karloff films that were on that TCM tape with the "Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome" flick I told you about the other day. Y'know, I find it pretty hard to believe, but as best I can figure, I'd never actually seen "The Black Cat" or "The Raven" before--though the latter's climactic "pit and the pendulum" sequence seemed awfully familiar, likely because it was featured in a documentary about co-star Bela Lugosi that I caught on PBS years ago. Inasmuch as both of these films garnered heavy visual coverage in the sixties' era monster mags I was briefly obsessed with, finally seeing them produced an odd sense of deja vu. Images, burned into my impressionable pre-teen mind, were finally playing themselves out on my TV screen, four and a half decades later!! Very odd sensation.

As for the movies themselves, the pre-Hays Code "The Black Cat" is easily superior to the following year's (1935) "The Raven". Both have little to do with Edgar Allen Poe, both offer enough blatantly implied torture to keep any and all of Lon Chaney's distant relatives happy, and both feature the scene-chewing thespian technique of Bela Lugosi, an acting approach that doesn't differ much whether he's playing the bad guy in "The Raven" or the good guy in "The Black Cat".

Karloff, on the other hand, displays an admirable versatility--though he's mostly wasted with a largely mute role in "The Black Cat" (as well as being made to suffer a less than classic make-up job). By contrast, as the urbane devil worshiper in "The Black Cat", he oozes menace even when traipsing about his futuristic act deco mansion in his dressing gown!!

But the real surprise for me was the OTHER Karloff-starrer, 1937's "West of Shanghai", a movie I was frankly totally unfamiliar with. The story isn't much--several Americans travel to China in hopes of making claims on a recently discovered oil field, only to run into a Chinese warlord, who takes them all as his prisoners. Boris, the aforementioned warlord, doesn't actually show up until about 15 minutes into this zippy 64 minute programmer, but once he does, things REALLY start to cook!!

I was fully expecting him to be a total brute, an unfettered Ghengis Khan type. Instead, delivering his lines rapid-fire in broken English, always with an underlying sense of amusement, Karloff's General Fang is more Charlie Chan by way of Damon Runyon!! Like I said, the plot's nothing much, but there's more than enough enjoyment to had listening to Karloff trade snappy patter with the rest of the cast to more than justify catching the flick if you ever get the chance!!

Going along with that line of thinking, I had sincerely hoped the whole thing was up on YouTube somewhere, but alas, 'tis not the case. However, there IS the original trailer for the film posted, and the two-and a half minutes it takes to eye-ball it may give you a taste of what I'm talking about. (Notice how even the on-screen blurbs are tongue -in-cheek, with the star billed as "Boris "Baby-scarer" Karloff"). Oh, and if the previews make ol' Boris out to be a bit more blood-thirsty than I described, please not that most of his threats encapsulated there-in were empty (though the two characters he does kill--or has killed--during the film truly had it coming.).

"West of Shanghai" gave me new and deeper appreciation for Karloff's acting prowess. Too bad he was usually type-cast as a baddie--there's evidence here that he could've done very nicely supplied with some dryly comedic material.

Bela on the other hand? Well, many of his later movies WERE funny. Trouble was, they generally weren't supposed to be. Oops...


The End--Or The Beginning?...
.

Yesterday, we went to see the Oscar nominated Best Picture contender, "The Reader", featuring Kate Winslet's Best Actress winning performance. As these sorta things go--former female SS officers seducing underage boys, using sex to con them into reading Homer's "The Odyssey" and Tintin comics out loud to them--it was pretty good. Winslet truly deserved her prize, not only for her acting (which was exemplary) but also for the sheer guts it took to perform so casually--and convincingly--naked for most of the first third of the film!! Whoda ever thought so much skin and simulated sex could get past the old fogeys in the Academy and still garner you an Oscar? I guess the story's Holocaust connection didn't hurt any...

But we're not here to talk about that. Decent movie--go see it. No, I want to complain about a trend I've been noticing of late, one that "The Reader" was especially guilty of:

Credits banished to the very end of the movie.

And not just credits, but the actual title as well!

Look, I'm not a TOTAL idiot, okay? I generally KNOW what film I've just seen, but still...

The movie ends, the screen goes black, and first up is the director's name (natch), then the writer, then the author of the original source material. Fine, I say, if somewhat begrudgingly. THEN the producers--of course. But if by now, you're expecting to see names of the stars of the film--much less the actual NAME of the thing, well, you're not even close!1.

No lie--the names of the HAIRDRESSERS rolled across the screen before the cast made an appearance--themselves preceding the godforsaken title, no less!! it had to be a good three or four minutes after the last scene played out before any of us still in the theater learned that that was Ralph Fiennes playing the male lead and not Liam Neeson (hey, an easy mistake to make, y'know?...).

And I got a newsflash for you, Hollywood--THERE WEREN'T HARDLY NO ONE LEFT IN THE THEATER BY THAT TIME!!!

There never is. It's amazing to see folks flee these darkened arenas as soon as the lights come up but before the credits begin to role in earnest--you'd think people were afraid that the last one out would be obligated to pay for the Best Boy's college education or somesuch!!

The truth is, you'd think the film-makers would WANT the folks watching their movies to know exactly WHO was responsible and put the credits--at least SOME of the credits (catering can wait til' later--no objections THERE...) at their flick's outset. But no. Someone. sometime decided it was way cooler to list the credits at the conclusion of a film, and now EVERYONE does it!! I was struck by the fact that "Coraline" DIDN'T resort to this now-tired device, and actually let the audience know who was responsible up front--because, god knows, even with some nifty animation accompanying the end credits, fully two-thirds of the patrons in the theater that afternoon fled their seats as soon as the curtain came down on the story proper.

So, c'mon, you cinematic artistes out there--put your masterpiece's name right up front. We won't think less of you, promise. Don't be shy--Kate Winslet certainly wasn't, and look what it got HER!...


Hang In There, Harold!!


When it comes to the so-called golden age of silent comedy, is there any single image more iconic than Harold Lloyd dangling precipitously from the hands of a building's clock, high above the streets below?

And yet, it was only recently that I FINALLY saw the film that contains this famous sequence, 1923's "Safety Last". Fact is, until I dug out an eight hour tape made back in 2003, when TCM broadcast an entire day's worth of his movies, I'd pretty much never seen a Harold Lloyd movie PERIOD!! Not really my fault, though--as indicated here, Lloyd owned a majority of his own films, and back in the sixties--when I would've been most likely to have viewed them--he was asking too much money to broadcast 'em, so most station managers chose chump change for Chaplin over loads of largess for Lloyd. Makes sense, I guess--but it also deprived me from appreciating the bespeckled comedian for way, WAY too long!!

The tape I had on hand was arranged chronologically, beginning with several shorts made in the late teens, then onto to a few Roaring Twenties era features (including his other classic, "The Freshman"), finishing up with an early pair of sound vehicles, "Welcome Danger" (1929) and "Movie Crazy" (1932). (Check out this fascinating article about "Welcome Danger'', Lloyd's first talkie. Originally filmed as a silent picture--AND clocking in at an astonishing 2 hours and 45 minutes!!--a majority of the picture was refilmed with sound after Lloyd witnessed the amazed reactions of audiences to other early talkies, adding dubbed dialog to the rest, while shaving off over an hour of the original's bloated running time. Frankly, it's a bit of a mess, but an interesting mess that's not with out it's bright spots. Right from the get-go, though, Lloyd comes across as tremendously comfortable speaking on screen. In fact, opposite the delightful Constance Cummings in "Movie Crazy", Lloyd makes for a very appealing romantic (albeit comedic) leading man.)

But forget all that for now. Let's talk "Safety Last". It's one of those universally accepted classics of the silent era. Hey, I've SEEN some of those universally accepted classics in my time, and I'm often left scratching my head afterwards, wondering just what all the fuss was about. Not this time. It's a wonderfully conceived film, and far more than the few famous seconds used in every compilation of famous film clips ever compiled. That whole climbing up the side of a building bit? It lasts nearly a half hour--and is set up very nicely, storywise, in the time preceding it. I wasn't a Harold Lloyd fan before popping this tape into the VCR, but "Safety Last" sold me.

And if you're not already sold, thanks to YouTube, you can take a look for yourself, and maybe it'll sell YOU too!!

Safety Last Part 1

Safety Last Part 2
Safety Last Part 3
Safety Last Part 4
Safety Last Part 5
Safety Last Part 6
Safety Last Part 7
Safety Last Part 8

Amazing what you can do with a pair of glasses and a whole lotta nerve...


Boys Will Be Boys


The other night, while searching unsuccessfully for a tape containing a bunch of early Bing Crosby flicks, I instead located that previously elusive tape housing the 2000 telefim, "The Beach Boys: An American Family", the one I couldn't find a few weeks back, so I instead watched "Return To The Batcave". Well, this time around, I figured it was fate, so simply I abandoned my quest for Bing and inserted this tape into the VCR instead.

Aside from The Beatles, The Beach Boys are my all-time favorites, so you might wonder why it took me so long to get around to watching this particular bio-pic. Well, one reason is, this ABC production hit the airwaves a mere ten years after NBC's "Summer Dreams: The Story of The Beach Boys". That was the one that starred Bruce Greenwood as Dennis Wilson, the wild brother, focusing inordinately on his antics and limiting brother Brian to second-banana status, ending with the drummer's tragic drowning death. It was also the film in which the Al Jardine character--Beach Boy number 5, for those of you keeping score at home--didn't merit a single line in the teleplay!! Not one!! So maybe, back there in the year 2000, I felt it was a bit too soon to revisit once again this all too familiar story (well, all too familiar at least to ME).

But I'm glad I did!! Not only was proper emphasis of this sprawling sage restored--composer Brian Wilson being the focal point, followed by his tyrannical father Murry, cousin (and collaborator ) Mike Love, with Dennis coming in a semi-distant fourth (though of course he naturally gets the spotlight during the recounting of his dalliance with the Manson Family). Amazingly, THIS Al Jardine gets plenty of dialog!! Even David Marks, his brief early era replacement, gets several scenes!! Frankly, I was amazed at the film's excessive attention to the group's genesis.

I shouldn't have been--and wasn't, not once the words "To Be Continued " flashed across the screen!! This was TWO-PARTER!! Four hours, not two!! D'oh--I totally forgot! when i began watching! But at that point, I was firmly committed (not to mention enthralled), so I kept on going, taking in the whole thing in one glorious single sitting.

Y'know, it's kinda pointless reviewing an otherwise unavailable TV flick from nearly ten years ago, except to say, if you're a Beach Boys fan--or even harbor a minor interest in the group--this flick is worth checking out (if you can FIND it...).

The only scene available on the YouTube was apparently posted by Nick Stabile, who portrayed Dennis (him again!...). In it, lip-syncing to Dennis's actual vocal, he performs the lovely "Forever" for dad Murry (4: 32). This is perhaps the only scene in the entire four hours in which Father Wilson comes off agreeably. Likely that's because the very next scene he's in (not included here), he falls out of bed and suffers a fatal heart attack. But at least Mr. Wilson made nice with Dennis first...

Unlike the 1990 teleflick, this one ends on an up note, focusing on a triumphant 1974 concert appearance of the revitalized Beach Boys (with each member's eventual fate written in text across close-ups of the various actors). This ending mirrored the finale of The Three Stooges ABC bio-pic of a year or so later (the one with Michael Chiklis as Curly), another recent--and belatedly--viewed hunk of VHS tape by yours truly (and a much sillier flick, as the flick's writers unconvincingly tried to work Stoogisms into their protagonist's everyday lives). That one had the rediscovered comics meeting their new-found TV bred audience for the first time, performing a live stage show for their new generation of fans in 1959. Nice ending--BOTH times ABC used it.

But The Boys story didn't come to a halt in 1974, not by a long-shot, as shown on a special two hour edition of A&E's "Biography: Brian Wilson", broadcast just a few days before the ABC mini-series, and seemingly done in conjunction with it (which I watched AFTER the fictionalized version). Seeing several of the anecdotes from the bio-pic in turn verbalized by various interviewees--gee, Brian really DID spill hot chocolate on his future wife when he first met her!!--was an odd experience, lemme tell ya! The last quarter century of Brian's largely Beach Boyless life is given due coverage, and it's not always a pretty picture. In fact, it rarely is. Against all odds, he survived.

But even if he didn't, his music will. I go in and out of cycles--and up until I watched all six hours of this tape, I'll admit, I was on an "out" cycle. But y'know, I ALWAYS come back to Beach Boys music eventually. I never stay away for long, and thanks to a little video nudging, everything from "Pet Sounds" to "Sunflower" to "Keepin" The Summer Alive" is getting prime time play on the ol' CD machine!! Can't say I'm going surfing anytime soon--and these days, I really DON'T get around--but that's okay. I'm more than happy to simply sit in my room and enjoy the good vibrations!!


I'm Ba-aaack!!


Pardon the absence.

Lynn and I left for Geneva last Monday, making the five hour drive upstate to pick up daughter Julie, who successfully completed her freshman year at Hobart and William Smith Colleges. It took us about two days to pack up all her stuff, and what we didn't leave at her boy friend Alec's apartment (like winter coats and such), we barely managed to stuff into our car--

AND THEN DROVE NORTH TO BUFFALO!!

Yup, it was time for a short vacation in Buffalo, New York. Know that thirty-five years ago this very month, I first met Lynn Moss there, a freshman who'd been living in the very same dorm as yours truly, though we'd blissfully ignored each other for the entire year until the waning weeks of the spring semester. I don't need to tell you how THAT came out! So naturally, Buffalo equals good memories, and we wanted to share those vibes with our offspring (the last time we'd been in town was way back in 1988, a couple years before Julie was hatched).

Big mistake.

The SUN Y Buffalo campus had changed significantly even by 1988, eleven years after we had left--the short of it is, there was an old, Main Street campus where we had both lived and attended most of our classes, and a new, just emerging (circa 1974) campus located out in the middle of nowhere about a twenty minute shuttle ride away from the original campus, very little of which was built while we attended the school. NOW the new campus is the main campus, a sprawling city in and of itself (and almost totally unfamiliar to us alumni) while the Main Street campus is now devoted entirely to medical and dental grad students. Norton Hall--once the bustling student union of yore, has since been renamed, rebuilt, and now houses dentists of the future and is no longer open to indiscriminately wander through!! And Cooke Hall--our beloved dorm? The name has since been transferred over to the no-longer-not-so-new campus, with the front door locked to previous residents. To add injury to insult, we were caught in a sudden rainstorm during our trudge down memory lane, a suitable end to a decidedly imperfect tour.

(And things looked even more dire while reinvestigating the various off-campus dwellings we rented back in the day. Just about every familiar landmark on Bailey Avenue was either gone completely or regrettably run down. Main Street was only slightly better--everything changed, save for Parkside Candies remaining intact, as well as--remarkably--Queen City Comics!! (Though Queen City was originally located on Bailey--by '88, it was on Main. It was the first bona fide comics store I ever regularly patronized--I can still recall walking down there my first weekend on campus and buying, among other books, the very first appearance of Master of Kung Fu in Marvel Special Edition. I never chatted much with the folks behind the counter, though, and my loyalties switched over to Grant Books across town mid-way through my stay in Buffalo, but it's nice to know they're still there. Yes, I stopped in. No, I didn't recognize anyone--unlike back in '88--I didn't buy anything, and as per usual, didn't identify myself. No point at this point, y'know?...)

So we spent a few hours with one of Lynn's aunts (another reason to visit the area--my wife has relatives in town) and visited the Albright Knox Art Gallery, and had a mostly good time. But going back to the old school in search of the past? Not the best idea we ever had.

Going to Niagara Falls on Friday? THAT was a GREAT idea!! Remind me to tell you about it sometime!

(And if you're Facebook friends with Lynn, check out the three photo albums of 60 pics each that she's already posted, with the Buffalo chapter still to come. Ah, ain't digital cameras grand? I'll try and share a handful of the 200 plus that we took here in the coming days, so don't say you haven't been warned!...)

Saturday, after a seven hour trek down the New York Thruway, we finally arrived home. It was fully my intention to share these personal endeavors with you later that self-same evening, but with only minutes of Monday left, I've FINALLY managed to bore you with the details of my mini-vacation in Buffalo!!

Vacation in Buffalo?

Well, it SOUNDED like a good idea at the time...


We Watched "Watchmen"!


Lynn, Julie and I just got back from the theater, having viewed the film adaptation of--as the credits would have it--the "graphic novel co-created and illustrated by Dave Gibbons", Mr. Moore apparently opting to eschew any credit for the original scenario. Without knowing specific details--I didn't read any reviews (and still haven't) before seeing the flick--I was nonetheless fully aware that this big screen version did not win universal plaudits from either folks familiar with the source material or from those blissfully unaware of it.

Me, I liked it.

Let me explain.

In the thirteen months it took DC to issue the original limited series back in 1986/1987, I read each of the twelve issues as they came out--and haven't since. I have a paperback collection of the whole thing I bought a long time back, with the plan in the back of my mind being to someday sit down and enjoy the whole thing in a far more concentrated period of time--but , well, I haven't, y'know? But I have paged through it in recent times, mostly looking for costume reference to do up my own versions of the main cast. So, I kinda knew the plot, having read the story once twenty two years ago, and looking at it, been reminded of some of the key visual cues, but oh so many of the finer points have long ago faded from my memory banks. And the two hours and forty five minutes I spent watching the, well, YOU know who--THAT was the very first time I experienced the story in toto without waiting a month in between each chapter, and it sure makes a difference.

Whether or not the film deviated from some key elements of the comics, I couldn't truly say. All I can say is that it worked for me as a movie, mostly. Yes, it lacked some of Moore's sublime verbiage, and while Gibbons art was masterfully replicated in general, the subtle artistry of his panel by panel breakdowns--a particular strong point of the original series--couldn't help but be totally lost. But there's a lot of story to be told, and it unfolds in segmented yet mostly smooth fashion. I had no trouble following it, and in fact, appreciated the ending more than I did when I finally read the twelfth and final issue (y'see, I had been anticipating the greatest finish of all time, which is fairly hard to deliver; sorta knowing what was actually gonna happen made it far easier to swallow). Lynn and Julie--neither of whom knew the first thing about the storyline--both proved up to the task of following the at times convoluted plot, and enjoyed it, mostly.

About the aforementioned mostlys. The movie's a bit on the violent side at times. Being familiar with the comic, I knew this going in. But you know what? A six panel sequence of a thug being killed to so as to facilitate another crook's access to a jailed Rorschach is a whole lot more intense when amplified--and expanded upon--on the big screen. The violence in the comic book version of Watchmen never seemed to be intended to titillate--I'm not sure I can say the same for the movie version. That was Lynn's big objection to the film, and as someone who doesn't particularly care for excessive bloodletting, it made me squirm at times as well. I could more easily tolerate the rudimentary fisticuffs favored by Nite Owl and Silk Spectre as opposed to the Grand Guigol-fueled antics of The Comedian and Rorschach, even if the actual point was to contrast their opposing approaches.

The actors? All fine. No one's gonna get nominated for an Oscar, but no one embarrassed themselves, either (though I thought that nose hastily puttied onto the actor playing Nixon WAS distracting at times...). I liked the music, especially the clever way they worked in Jimi Hendrix's version of "All Along The Watchtower" (not nearly as subtle a drop-in as the fleeting use of a Supertramp ditty in the first Superman movie, but decidedly more appropriate).

Overall, the so-called greatest graphic novel of all time made for a decent movie--and I think THAT'S why it failed to connect more with either the general public or to devoted Moore/Gibbons fans. "THIS was the greatest graphic novel of all time?", the uninitiated no doubt wondered, and to those to whom it WAS the greatest graphic novel of all time, well, it clearly wasn't the greatest movie of all time, so they had to be disappointed as well. Me, I know movies are movies and comics are comics, and I try not to expect them to be one and the same. So, it was a decent movie. Now, I'm hoping to find some time to finally reread the limited series--and maybe then, I'll realize just how bad a movie it was! But for tonight, save for witnessing a little more blood splattered than I may've liked (and I am ever so thankful we didn't see it in IMAX!!...), I had a good time. Better than I did at "The Dark Knight", "The Hulk", or yes, even at "The Spirit"--but nope, not "Iron Man".

On a side note, the theater was fairly full (it was dollar day, reduced to a single showing in the film's second and final week), and unfathomably, someone brought a BABY to see "Watchmen"! Forget who's watching the Watchmen--who's watching those parents?? Geez, at least the kid was mostly quiet--and may well've left midway through, as nary a peep was heard after awhile--but still, WHAT were they thinking?...


Another Day, Another Movie


We all went to see "Adventureland" today (paid the full two dollar admission as well--wanted to make sure we caught it before it left the multiplex). Seeing that this romantic teen comedy set at a run-down amusement park, circa 1987, received a surprisingly high average of 89% over at Rotten Tomatoes was impetus enough to get me to see a flick I likely otherwise would've passed on (plus, truth is, I'm a sucker for the amusement park milieu).

It wasn't bad, but I sorta felt I'd already seen it a few months back, as "Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist", whose plot was very similar (and which I liked a whole lot better--and not just because I saw it first). Star Jesse Eisenberg--who looks like a cross of SNL's Andy Samberg and the aforementioned "Nick", Michael Cera"--portrays a sensitive, intellectual college grad (who also happens to be a virgin) working a summer job at a cheesy amusement park, before going off to grad school in the fall. There he meets fellow employee, the worldly Kristen Stewart (the female star of the "Twilight" series). Eventually (and inevitably), this mismatched pair fall in love, but not without enduring a fair amount of complications both before and after.

Very few laughs, though--anybody expecting a raunchy teen sexfest (which is how the TV commercials tried to sell this) will be sorely disappointed. Despite the obligatory swearing, drinking, drugging, and (off-screen) copulating, the heart of the story is sweet. It's just that I must be going to too many movies these days, as it sure feels as if I've seen it all before. Stewart and Eisenberg make for an attractive couple, but that's ANOTHER thing--do girls like Stewart (or Kat Dennings in "Nick and Norah") REALLY wind up with guys like Eisenberg or Cera, or are these movies as preposterous fantasies as "Watchmen"? I mean, these kinda stories have a certain appeal to guys like ME, but I wonder how the LADIES in the audience are feeling? "Oh great--the geek gets the hot girl--be calm my pitter pattering heart." Where are the movies in which the geeky GAL gets the hunk? (Not that I really need to rush out to see said film, mind you--just curious...).

SNLer's Bill Hader and Kristen Wiig have supporting roles as the married couple who run the park, but only Hader has the opportunity to generate any laughs. Wiig--currently the funniest and most used cast member of the venerable sketch show--has little to do, and does it very quietly. Someday she'll get a proper big-screen showcase, but this sure ain't it.

One other quibble--when it comes to teen romcoms, I've come to expect a certain amount of boozing and drugging, but I kinda thought this movie went a bit over the line into irresponsible territory. I seem to recall that the two lead characters in "Nick and Norah" eschewed both, leaving the drinking entirely to their friends in the back of the van, as the group drove all around Manhattan on one eventful night. Conversely, in "Adventureland", everyone--including our sensitive, intellectual leading man--is shown repeatedly smoking pot and drinking alcohol--

AND THEN BLITHELY GETTING BEHIND THE WHEEL OF A CAR!!

Again and again. With no real consequences, save for (SPOILER WARNING) late in the flick when, bummed by his break-up with Stewart, Eisenberg grabs a bottle of hard liquor his dad has stashed in the glove compartment, guzzles it while driving, swerves to miss another car, hits a tree, and wakes up the next morning to be berated by his mother, ultimately relinquishing all the money he earned at the park to pay for the auto's damages!! Well, THAT'LL sure teach HIM!! In relation to cinematic substance abuse, there have been more responsible Cheech and Chong flicks! Geez...

Otherwise, not a bad movie, just not nearly as good as I expected it to be--and given the choice, I'd easily recommend the superior "Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist".
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 
Another two-fer!

Check out the April 28th Fred Sez for five new Hembeck illos for sale--and five accompanying gags to gag on!

And below is my latest movie review..


Gran Pa

We went to see Clint Eastwood's "Gran Torino" yesterday..

Up until a few months back, when we took in "Changeling"--featuring Angelina Jolie's Oscar nominated performance--I'd never seen a movie directed by Eastwood. Heck, aside from the initial "Dirty Harry" movie, which I saw back when it first came out, I'd hardly ever even seen Clint the ACTOR!! But I was so impressed with "Changeling"--which I gather isn't even close to being his best film--that I made it a point to check out him pulling double-duty on "Gran Torino" as soon as it hit our local budget theater. Whereas not all that long ago, I woulda let it pass by without even thinking twice.

The plot? Eastwood plays Walt Kowalski, an embittered Korean War vet. The film opens at his wife's funeral, and we soon see that this is a man who doesn't let anyone get close to him, even his two adult sons and their families--and especially not the Asians who've moved in next door. Kowalski spews racist nomenclature easily and freely, and initially, wants no part whatsoever of his neighbors. However, after foiling a botched attempt to steal his pristine mint 1972 Gran Torino as part of an initiation forced upon the reluctant Thao (Bee Vang) by a gangbanger cousin, an unlikely bond develops between the two, one largely facilitated by the boys older sister Sue (Ahney Her).

Now, this could just as easily be the plot of a sappy, ABC After School Special, as it could be of a really good movie.

Guess what? Chalk me up for coming down on the side of "really good movie"--heck, make that "really, REALLY good movie". Somehow, "Gran Torino" missed out on getting any Oscar noms (maybe they figured Clint had already raked in his share?...), but for my money (merely one thin dollar, admittedly), I found this flick to be more moving than several of the films that did gather a few Academy nods. There's no doubt, for instance, that given the choice, I'd pick this one over "Doubt". But, as noted in the past, I don't get a vote, so sorry Mr. E. I'm thinking he deserved to be in the mix for the acting award, and the work of his two young Asian co-stars (newcomers both, this being their only credit on both their individual imdb pages) is exemplary as well. The predictable story unfolds unpredictably, with sweet moments, funny moments, thought-provoking moments, and yes, a few pivotal violent moments. In the end. the character of Kowalski somehow all makes sense, and as unlikable as he appears in the movie's opening minutes, you'll find yourself rooting for him in the film's final moments.

Hey, how can you NOT love a guy who, three decades after turning "make my day" into a national catch phrase, does his level best to claim "get off my lawn" as his own, simply by snarling it so unforgettably?...

(Note to comics fans: one of three executive producers on the project is Jenette Kahn. Yes, THAT Jenette Kahn. Guess old Warner Brothers connections don't fade easily...)
Monday, April 27, 2009 

Current mood:  cheerful
Been a little lax in copying over my Fred Sez blogs lately, so here's two at once--dig in, MySpacers!!

Boris Sure Is Bad Enough


Last night, I went on another one of my VHS fishing expeditions--I came across an eight hour tape that simply had "Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome" scrawled on it.

I popped it into the VCR, and then went about discovering what else was recorded there. Made up entirely of Turner Classic Movie material from 2003, the aforementioned Gould meets "Ghoul" programmer led things off, followed by "West Of Shanghai", "The Raven", "The Black Cat", "Freaks", and "M". Boris Karloff was the featured star of the first four films (the two Poe flavored flicks i saw long, long ago, the other two not at all), "Freaks" I actually remember watching shortly after taping it off TCM, mostly to satisfy a decades old curiosity, and "M" I've yet to see.

But just to keep things simple, I decided to start at the beginning and scope out Karloff's 1947 performance as Gruesome. He receives top-billing over Ralph Byrd's Dick Tracy,and he truly deserves it. Not only is he afforded substantial screen time (something that was not always the case when tuning into a lesser forties' Karloff or Lugosi vehicle), but he's far a more interesting character as well!! Truth is, I'd never seen a Tracy film before (save for the Warren Beatty update). After several earlier serials starring Byrd, this was the last of four feature films (the initial pair starring Morgan Conway), though Byrd would be back in 1950 to film 39 episodes of a "Dick Tracy" TV program, and would've filmed more if he hadn't died suddenly of a heart attack (yes, I've been doing my internet homework!). From what I've been able to gather, contemporary critics found this last Tracy film, while enjoyable, more cartoonishly campy than the three that preceded it. Was it the appearance of Dr. A. Tomic that did it, or was it his comely assistant, professor

 I.M. Learned? Beats me, but for an alleged chuckle-fest, the final half of this thing features enough indiscriminate homicide to pass for an episode of "24"!! And of course, Boris is right in the thick of it all!! (Naturally, he gets his eventually--gosh, is that a spoiler, or simply a foregone conclusion?--but wait'll you see HOW he's dispatched!! Not exactly cricket, Dick...

(Trivia note: Tarzan of the (near) future, Lex Barker, has the unbilled role of an ambulance driver who gets slugged in the flick's final minutes--gee, you can hardly recognize the guy with his shirt on!!)

And you CAN share in all the fun, thanks to YouTube!! Yup, it's another in our ever-popular series of "First Fred watches it on tape, then he passes it along to YOU via the YouTube!" blog entries. It's in six parts, and runs a total of 65 minutes. Watch for the scene where, as the police are rapidly closing in, the big boss asks Gruesome to look after and protect his lady friend for him, prompting Boris to smile and answer reassuringly. What happens next AIN'T for the faint of heart, lemme tell ya!

Anyway, enjoy! I did!!

Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome Part 1
Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome Part 2
Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome Part 3
Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome Part 4
Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome Part 5
Dick Tracy Meets Gruesome Part 6


Oh, Mother--Times Two

Thanks to the internet, one of my favorite things to do after watching a movie or an old--or even not all that old--TV show is to Google the names of the various supporting actors and actresses seen in the end credits, cuz you never know what you're gonna find.

Take, for instance, the case of Irene Tedrow. That's exactly what i did after watching her in the pivotal--yet peripheral--role of Congresswoman Geddes in one of my very favorite episodes of "The Mary Tyler Moore Show", "The Dinner Party". That's the one, you might recall, where Mary throws a disastrous dinner-party for her Congresswoman friend, a party where there's more guests than portions of food (Rhoda unexpectedly brings along a pre-Fonz Henry Winkler as her date). Most memorable is the moment when a hungry Lou Grant casually takes what amounts to two full portions, only to have to put half of it back at Mary's panicky behest!! Funny, funny scene!!

So anyway, following the cat's final meow, I checked out Irene Tedrow's imdb page. Some impressive credits there, but I found a pair that would be of particular interest to the comics fans amongst us (which is pretty much all of you, I'm guessing).

In 1975, Ms. Tedrow essayed the role of Martha Kent in the TV adaptation of the quasi-hit Broadway show, "It's A Bird, It's A Plane, It's Superman!".

A few years later, in 1978, on the short-lived Nicholas Hammond "Spider-Man' program. she played Aunt May!!

That's right, folks--this lady holds the unique distinction of being the ONLY actress to play the adoptive mother-figure to both Superman AND Spider-Man on the tube!! Now THAT'S an internet era factoid if ever I saw one!!

Y'know, if only Bill Dozier hadn't jettisoned the role of Martha Wayne on the old "Batman" show. Who knows? Maybe Irene Tedrow coulda qualified for a triple-header!!
Currently listening:
Woodstock: Three Days of Peace & Music
By Various Artists
Release date: 1994-08-09
Sunday, April 26, 2009 
As you may've heard, the fine folks over at YouTube have recently instituted a section of their site devoted to both full-length movies and entire episodes of various television programs. These are NOT the user-posted clips that have made YouTube famous, but high-quality, officially sanctioned, all-in-one videos.

You can go here to see what you can see.

Lotsa good stuff, huh? And with all the top-quality goodies available for one's viewing, just WHERE do you think I gravitated towards?

Uh huh. The so-called "Worst Program In Television History", "My Mother The Car".

I hadn't seen the show since it ran its single season back in 1965, and I actually recall liking it. Of course, I WAS 13 at the time, so I figured it was past time to take another look.

YouTube has five episodes of "My Mother The Car" available, including the very first one.

Over the last few days, I watched all five of them. So, is it THAT bad? No. Is it in fact sorta good, the way I remember it? Also no. Let me explain...

The production values are high, with a fair amount of the scenes filmed outside. The car looks way spiffy. The entire cast gives it all they've got. Those are the pluses.

The minuses? It's just not very funny. Star Jerry Van Dyke appears to be obliged to amp down the natural gregariousness he displayed earlier on brother Dick's show. And the concept is not only silly, it's stifling.

Look, "Bewitched", "I Dream Of Jeanie", "My Favorite Martian", and "Mr. Ed" were all of the same era as "My Mother The Car", and all shared a central conceit with it--one character, and one character only, is aware of a magical totem right smack dab in the middle of things. A witch. A genie.A martian. A talking horse. All were big hits. All were just as fanciful as having your dead mother come back, reincarnated, as a talking car, maybe, but far more manageable, storywise. Viewers found the notion of a pair of attractive young women performing magical tricks, a faux uncle who's really a man from outer space, and even a horse that talks, far easier to believe. For one thing, each of them could casually interact with those in the cast unaware of their special abilities, even the horse. But David Crabtree's (Jerry Van Dyke) mother? There wasn't much she (the voice of early sitcom icon Ann Sothern) could do but squawk at her son via the radio when he--and he alone--was sitting in the car. Sorta limited the plot possibilities...

Which is probably why, of the five episodes up on YouTube (numbers 1,2, 4, 5, and 6, out of 30), three concern themselves with recurring foil (and easily the funniest thing about this whole misbegotten enterprise) Captain Manzini (played by Avery Schreiber, aided by his distinctive walrus mustache and essayed with all the subtlety of a silent film villain), a rich car collector who's desperate to own the rare (and in reality, non-existent) 1928 Porter that for some reason he can't pry away from Crabcake.

"Crabtree!"

"Whatever..."

And THAT folks, is the recurring gag that occurs not only in every episode that Schreiber appears in, but in virtually every SCENE he appears in!! Geez, talk about running a gag into the ground...

The Captain isn't involved at all in the second episode, but the premise there has Jerry worried so much about some car strippers that have been plaguing the neighborhood, he eventually winds up sleeping in the garage with mom!! And I guess that's brings us to the subliminal (for 1965) ick factor. Dave complains early in the episode that he doesn't want his mother stripped! In another show, he hoses her down with cold water, declaring "I'm gonna give you a bath, mom", and gets a big giggle when she complains the water is too cold! And there's that whole bit about sleeping in the garage with her. Dave's wife (Maggie Pierce, in a thankless role) eventually shows up with pillow in hand to join her seemingly vastly over-concerned hubby, and as they snuggled in the front seat, I couldn't help but think, after forty subsequent years of sit-com coarsening, how things might've played out if this same episode were filmed today. The oblivious wife would likely look in the back seat, and remind her flustered husband of what they used to do in their younger days in just such a situation, and suggestively suggest for old times sake that--well, I think you see where I'm going here!! Freudian hilarity ensues!! Ick factor, notched to the max!

That said, I want to make special mention of episode 5, "Burned At The Steak". This particular story could've played on any other sit-com of the day--the car plays a small, mostly incidental role this time around, being most notable for tipping Dave off that the newlyweds next door have been fighting. It's all about her bad cooking--including that charred hunk of steak--and Crabtree tries his best to reunite the pair. Of course, things backfire, and instead the couple head for divorce court!! Turns out Dave's a lawyer (a fact I hadn't gleaned in the previous three episodes), so he gets to represent the wife and her Laura Petrie hairdo. More amazingly, though, hubby (a young, subdued Charles Grodin) has a ridiculously aggressive Lee Van Cleef handling his briefs!! Even without a talking car factoring into the proceedings, events unfold in a surreal manner that, even for mid-sixties sitcoms, is--like the aforementioned steak--hard to swallow!! But Van Cleef is a real hoot, no doubt about it.

You'll also see Bill Daily, James Sikking, and Barbara Bain pop up in various episodes, should you be able make it through all five shows. No, I certainly can't say it's a good show, but I can't deny being strangely fascinated by it either. There's no laugh track, so you're on your own there (me, I chuckled out loud only once, when mom complained of her "CARthritis"--your milage may vary).

Now, if I could only get that blasted theme song out of my head!!
Wednesday, April 22, 2009 
Last night, Lynn and I saw (in regular ol' 2-D) "Coraline", the stop-motion, computer-enhanced, animated adaptation of Neil Gaiman's award-winning children's novel. What follows is less a review than a confession...

It almost put me to sleep!!

Literally. After about fifteen minutes in, it was all I could do to keep my eyes open. As faithful readers of this blog are well aware, over the last 13 months or so, me and the missus have been taking in pretty much a movie a week, and in all that time, a similar, inexplicable bout of grogginess occurred only one other time.

When? While watching "Wall-E".

Not during the extended, mostly silent opening sequence, but once the story shifted over to that spaceship with all the computer generated humans milling about? THAT'S when I found myself continually fighting to keep my eyelids in the upright and locked position!! At the time, I figured my reaction was just one of those things--"Wall-E' was among the flicks I never quite got around to blogging about, so I never mentioned my curious reaction here. And y'know, I liked it well enough--though obviously couldn't work up the type of enthusiasm for it that a fair amount of folks who considered it an instant classic did.

But now there seems to be case building for me to admit--first to myself, and then to you--that, geez, I simply can't become viscerally engaged with computer animated feature films! This newly discovered personal blind spot may explain my past less than delighted reactions to beloved fan-favorites such as "The Incredibles" and "Finding Nemo", both of which I originally viewed on the small screen. (And no, I've never seen "The Nightmare Before Christmas", "James and The Giant Peach", or "The Corpse Bride", though I had always wanted too. Maybe not so much anymore...). Still, rather inexplicably, I distinctly recall being totally enchanted by both of the "Toy Story" films, and easily managed to stay awake for "Shrek" 1 and 3 (missed 2), so perhaps there's still hope for me. Guess we'll find out when "Monsters vs. Aliens" comes to our local theater in a few weeks).

Y'know, I have no problem with hand drawn animated films (or ones that LOOK hand-drawn anyway). When Julie was younger, the whole family enjoyed the likes of "The Little Mermaid", "Beauty and the Beast", "Pocahontas", "The Hunchback of Notre Dame", and "Aladdin", to name just a few--even if they began to seem pretty formulaic eventually. And I certainly loved the big-screen escapades of SpongeBob and The Simpsons! But apparently, there's something about computer generated cartoon images that just don't click for me (or puppets either--I've never harbored the least bit of affection for The Muppets, truth to tell). Because, c'mon--I'm nodding off during the sumptuous visual fest that is "Coraline" and yet I'm sitting in rapt attention on my couch, never missing a single beat of that less than remarkable JLA teleflick? I'll be the first to admit it, friends--clearly, there's something WRONG with me!!

So pay me no mind--go see "Coraline". If you're a fairly normal person, you're likely to enjoy it (even if the storyline isn't nearly as full of stunning surprises as I was led to believe from reports posted elsewhere. If you've actually read a Gaiman comic or two--and back when I kept up, I polished off the entire SANDMAN run--the shocks will be few).

Just gotta remember the NoDoz next time!...
Tuesday, April 21, 2009 
Things That Were Never Meant For Me To See...



...I FINALLY saw.



Yup, been doing more rooting through old,
previously unwatched video-tapes, and I came
up with two--you should pardon the expression--gems
these last couple of nights (both made for
me, long ago, by a close buddy--thanks big
guy!! Can "Black Adder" be very
far over the horizon now?...)



First into the VCR was the ill-fated 1994
"Fantastic Four" movie that was
never released. (For the curious, this page does an admirable job summarizing
the whole sorry situation, and then some
). Produced purely to maintain the rights
to Marvel's oldest family, with apparently
no intention of EVER seeing the light of
day--a salient fact that was kept from the
actors, director, crew, and--he'd have you
believe--even hired gun producer Roger Corman
himself--what you have is one of the cheapest
looking movies you're EVER likely to see!!




But is it WORTH the seeing?



I'd say have to say yes, but with reservations.
The special effects are almost nonexistent
and the script is simply pedestrian. Despite
these flaws, the filmmakers do a decent job
of capturing the comics series proper spirit
(even if the scene, pre-rocket launch, in
which Sue and Johnny's mom dubs the quartet
"The Fantastic Four:" for no discernible
reason, IS cringe-worthy). When I mentioned
that I'd seen this flick recently over on
my Facebook page, a LOT of positive comments
came in from folks, some even preferring
it to the later, big-budget version!! I'm
not prepared to go THAT far, but I will say
I thought that their Dr. Doom. looked truer
to the comics version that his latter day
doppelganger (though the decision to record
the actors lines while wearing that metal
mask was, in the final analysis, the wrong
one. Or as Reed might've said to Doc in the
heat of battle, "What? WHAT did you
say? Could you repeat that threat, please?...").
And look, I LOVE Jessica Alba, honest, but
Rebecca Staab looks EXACTLY the way Jack
Kirby drew Sue Storm (even if she and the
rest of the group were wearing the John Byrne
designed outfits...).



It's a fun curio--and the very last image
is a true hoot! It's just as well it was
never released, though, as it might well've
killed the audience's potential appetite
for any future FF flicks.



And speaking of appetites...




Did you know there was a two hour pilot made
for a proposed "Justice League of America
" series back in 1997? And that, from
what I've been able to ascertain looking
around the 'net, unlike the relatively warmly
received FF movie, THIS unreleased piece
of cinema is basically reviled? Yup, it's
true.



But for all it's faults--and there are many--i
found it just as entertaining, and maybe
even a smidgen bit more so, than the FF flick.
I can see why fans didn't like it, though,
as it strays way, WAY far away from the source
material. Guy Gardner is Green Lantern, for
instance, but while he's outfitted in Guy's
costume, his mask--and his persona--come
directly from Kyle Rayner. Barry Allen is
The Flash--but this isn't any Barry Allen
WE'VE ever seen in the comics. And while
this production is much spiffier than the
FF one--and the special effects marginally
better--the costumes are just plain awful!!
Fire and Ice, the two female members--and
unassailable evidence that the producers
were attempting to emulate the light-hearted
Giffen/DeMatteis JLA era--pass muster, clotheswise
(two attractive women in skin tight outfits--tough
to botch THAT up!), but the male members
range from barely passable (GL), mostly right
with key elements way wrong (The Flash's
mask and gloves), to impossibly dorky looking
(The Atom). David Ogden Stiers as J'onn J'onnz
actually looks fairly decent--until the camera
catches a sideways silhouette of him! From
MASH to mashed potatoes--way. WAY too many
mashed potatoes, apparently!!



Storywise, the plot revolves around what
is more or less the origin and induction
into the League of Ice (she's decked out
in costume only briefly, in the show's final
seconds) as the group takes on the mysterious
Weather Man. Interspersed throughout are
interview clips with the various members,
making pithy observations on their day-to-day
lives as super-heroes. Truth to tell, I thought
this added quite a bit of personality to
the proceedings and liked the conceit quite
a bit. There were even some mildly witty
lines sprinkled throughout these segments,
and combined with the fairly decent acting
(particularly from the thespians portraying
Ice, Ray Palmer, and big-browed Green Stiers
himself (though if you look closely, his
neck is continually in need of a tad more
emerald make-up...)). I can see where this
may not've been the best direction for a
JLA telefilm to head in, but--aside from
those truly horrendous outfits--it's a mildly
interesting approach. it sure made me appreciate
the Ice character far more than I ever had
before, that's for sure!!



Anyway, that's the way I feel about things.
If you wanna judge for yourself, well, no
need to scrounge up an overpriced bootleg
copy of either previously suppressed super-hero
epic--merely go look for YOURSELF!! (Yup
that means YOU, John Firehammer!) BOTH of 'em are are on the YouTube!; links
to follow...




JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 1



JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 2

JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 3


JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 4


JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 5


JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 6


JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 7

JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 8


JLA TV pilot 1997 Part 9





Fantastic Four 1994 Part 1



Fantastic Four 1994 Part 2


Fantastic Four 1994 Part 3


Fantastic Four 1994 Part 4


Fantastic Four 1994 Part 5

Fantastic Four 1994 Part 6

Fantastic Four 1994 Part 7


Fantastic Four 1994 Part 8


Fantastic Four 1994 Part 9




Enjoy! (Well, if you can...)


Sunday, April 19, 2009 
Got a couple of Hembeck-centric links
for
you folks today.



A while back, Rob Kelly over The Aquaman Shrine, commissioned yours truly to come up with
a brand new gag in the tradition of my long-ago
cartoon strips featured in DC's Daily Planet
promo pages (a fair number of which can be
viewed over at Neil Polowin's The Hembeck Files), giving me carte blanche to scribble out
whatever silly joke came to mind, the only
condition being that it feature (natch) Aquaman!



An intriguing challenge, and after
thinking
about it for a bit, this--lovingly colored by Rob himself--is
what I came up with!
(And here's a link to the blog entry detailing how the
whole thing came to be
). Having far more room to play with than
I did back in the old DC days, the art is
far more expansive than what was usually
found down on the outer corners of the Daily
Planet pages, but the gag? Not a whole lot
different. Check it out--I hope it'll make
you groan AND grin!



Then there's the latest Five For Friday survey
over at Tom Spurgeon's The Comics Reporter. The question: Name Five Specific Superhero
Serial Storylines Of Which You're Fond (In
Other Words, You Don't Have To Be Able To
Make A Case For Them, You Just Have to Like
Them)



View my response by going here, which includes the very first series of
continued stories I ever came across in my
many, many years of reading comics.



And come back HERE again soon, for more fun-filled
opportunities to waste your precious time!!
See ya!!