Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 35
Sign: Pisces
City: Brooklyn
State: New York
Country: US
Signup Date: 5/21/2005
|
|
|
|
Thursday, April 10, 2008
 |
Current mood:  content
Category: Life
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, December 22, 2006
 |
According to a recent Newsweek poll, 67% of Americans believe in the virgin birth of Jesus. You'll find that our collective belief in the supernatural, whether it's our imaginary 'father' in the sky, angels, or aliens, is quite unique for an advanced industrial society.
I devote the majority of my time in this journal to attacking many of the myths and misconceptions we hold regarding our country and the world around us: the media has a liberal bias, the death penalty deters crime, war works, and a host of other issues. But as the biggest Christian holiday on the calendar rolls around, I thought it would be fun to take a look at the central myth surrounding Jesus: that he was born of a virgin.
Myth? What am I talking about? This has nothing to do with my belief or disbelief in the supernatural at all. In fact, my argument lives within the pages of the Bible. I will try to be as clear as possible. Let me explain.
The belief that Jesus was born of a virgin rests on two biblical quotes:
Matthew 1:22-23 Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.
Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.
As you can see, the author of Matthew quotes the verses from Isaiah in refrence to the belief that Jesus was born a virgin as a sign of prophecy. The problem? Isaiah did not use the Hebrew word for virgin (bethulah) but instead used the Hebrew term almah, which simply means a young maiden. In fact, Isaiah 7:14 is correctly translated in the New Revised Standard Version, and the New Jerusalem Bible. I use the New Revised Standard Version.
The quote above is typically what people will find when learning about the virgin birth. Like most alleged prophecies it is taken out of context in such a way as to lead the believer to assume it must be referring to Jesus. Let me quote a fuller section of the text in question to give it context:
Therefore the LORD himself will give you a sign. Look, the young woman is with child and shall bear a son, and shall name him Immanuel. He shall eat curds and honey and by the time he knows how to refuse evil and choose good. For before the child knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land before whose two kings are in dread will be deserted. The LORD will bring on you and on your people and on your ancestral house such days as have ot come since the day that Ephraim departedfrom Judah--the king of Assyria." (Isaiah 7:14-17)
OK, where most Christian theologians stop quoting gives the distinct impression that the sign god will give his people is that a virgin will give birth. However, when read in its greater context, it is clear that the pregnancy and birth of the child is not the sign at all, but is merely to give a refrence of time to his listners. Isaiah is telling his people that within the time frame of this baby being born, and knowing good from evil (about the age of eight) the kings we dread will be no more. Also note that the baby is not to be named Jesus, but Immanuel.
Various theories exist that attempt to explain how this happened. One theory posits that the Virgin Birth story began as a polemic against Talmudic writings which depicted Jesus as the bastard son of a Roman soldier. While I favor this theory, I won't delve into it simply because it can be a bit confusing for those not already familiar with biblical scholarship. Furthermore, I believe a much simpler theory does a very good job of explaining this discreprancy.
It was based on a mistranslation. You see, many first century Jews, including Jesus and his disciples, relied upon the Greek translation of their Hebrew scriptures: The Septuagint. The Septuagint mistranslated Isaiah 7:14 with the Greek word parthenos, which is the word for virgin. Matthew probably used this version and thus this was probably the source for his error.
Obviously such a direct assault against such a dearly held myth has not gone unnoticed. Various theologians have attempted to attack this analysis. I won't go into all the counter arguments here simply because it would take too much time. But I will address one point that is raised in response to this analysis.
One argument states that since this is a prophecy a miracle must be implied. Since a natural birth is not miraculous we must inferthat a virgin is meant. I found this response by James D. Price:
Now if the *'almah* conceived by natural means, then no miracle occurred. Young women conceive regularly by natural means. There is nothing miraculous about that. The only way the conception could be a miraculous sign would be for it to be supernatural. Thus, it is appropriate to conclude that the word *'almah* means "virgin" here also.
As I stated earlier, the use of the imagery of a woman having a baby is to give the listener a time line. The miracle isn't that a virgin is going to have a baby, but that within a short time (by the time this baby knows right from wrong) God will deliver the Jews from these kings.
Most the other arguments are either grammatical or are deeply tied to a familiarity with Hebrew that would make them tedious to explain and boring to read.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, October 11, 2006
 |
Current mood:  amused
 You're not a wage slave are you? You get paid a "fair days wage for a fair days work," right? If you're boss/slave-renter didn't pay you enough you could just go find another job. At least that's the usual argument. I have a nice big sticker on my hard hat that says "Wage Slave" in nice big bold letters. I'm a wage slave. Most people, however, don't know what to make of it. They want me to explain it to them. "What's a wage slave?" they ask. When I explain it to them they usually look at me with a rather puzzled look and go on about their business. That's not surprising. The term wage slave lost its meaning long ago. In Norman Ware's classic The Industrial Worker he points out: The term 'wage-slave' had a much better understanding in the forties [1840s] than it has today. It was not then regarded as an empty shibboleth of the soap-box orator. This would suggest that it has suffered only the normal degradation of language, has become a cliche, not that it is a grossly misleading characterization. In fact it's not at all misleading. It's an accurate description of the majority of workers who toil to earn a living each day, and it was recognized as such very early on: When the producer, whether master or journeyman, sold his product, he retained his person. But when he came to sell his labor, he sold himself. The term 'wage' that displaced 'price' as the Industrial Revolution advanced had formerly applied only to day labor, and the extension of the term to the skilled worker was regarded by him as a symbol of a deeper change. (Norman Ware, The Industrial Worker p xxi) Did you catch that? You can't sell your labor without selling yourself. We can't separate our labor from ourselves. We are rented slaves. As late as 1854, a little group of highly skilled pianoforte makers in New York declared that a daily wage was equivalent to slavery and hoped that "the day is far distant when they [the wage-earners] will so far forget what is due to manhood as to glory in a system forced on them by necessity and in opposition to their feelings of independence and self-respect. May the piano trade long be spared such exhibitions of the degrading power of the day system (New York Daily Tribune, March 22, 1854). Sadly, most American workers have long forgotten what is due to "manhood" (humanity?) and glory in a system that robs them of the wealth they create. There is no such thing as a "fair wage." We are all wage slaves to one degree or another. Recognition of this simple fact might spur us to take greater efforts in overthrowing this corrupt and immoral system of global capitalism. It's really important to realize that wage slavery isn't hyperbole.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, May 22, 2005
 |
This weekend I will celebrate the birth, the Awakening, and the final liberation of the Buddha in the Visakha Puja festival. Rather than post about the festival--though I may do that in another post--I'd like to share with you what I admire so much about the Buddha. Why do I think the Buddha was so special.
Spirit of Free Inquiry
"Do not go upon what has been acquired by repeated hearing; nor upon tradition; nor upon rumor; nor upon what is in a scripture; nor upon surmise; nor upon an axiom; nor upon specious reasoning; nor upon a bias towards a notion that has been pondered over; nor upon another's seeming ability; nor upon the consideration, 'The monk is our teacher.' When you yourselves know: 'These things are good; these things are not blamable; these things are praised by the wise; undertaken and observed, these things lead to benefit and happiness,' enter on and abide in them." The Buddha When I first read these words some dozen or so years ago I was blown away. As I traveled across the landscape of the world's religions I had become used to exhortations to believe or suffer the consequences. Again and again I was told to follow this teaching or that teaching based on little more than fear.
The Buddha appealed to my sense of reasoning. He never asks me to believe in something that is irrational or unreasonable. It's a system of practice that allows the practitioner to test the teachings on a daily basis.
Another salient point here is that the Buddha was a master at helping us ask the right questions: the questions that would lead us to an understanding of reality and help us gain release from our suffering. Most of us approach religion asking all the wrong questions. We want to "find ourselves" or understand where we came from. How did the universe originate. Where will our 'soul' go when we die, etc.
The Buddha, again and again, would simply point out that answers to any of those questions could not possibly lead to happiness. I have always been amazed at the way he approached such questions and the gentle and compassionate way he steers the discussion to more germane issues.
Proselytizing
"On one occasion Upali, a follower of Nigantha Nataputta, approached the Buddha and was so pleased with the Buddha's exposition of the Dhamma that he instantly expressed his desire to become a follower of the Buddha. But the Buddha cautioned him, saying:"Of a verity, O householder, make a thorough investigation. It is well for a distinguished man like you to make (first) a thorough investigation." Upali, who was overjoyed at this unexpected remark of the Buddha, said:"Lord, had I been a follower of another religion, its adherents would have taken me round the streets in a procession proclaiming that such and such a millionaire had renounced his former faith and embraced theirs. But, Lord, Your Reverence advises me to investigate further. The more pleased am I with this remark of yours. For the second time, Lord, I seek refuge in the Buddha, Dhamma and the Sangha."
This naturally flows from the spirit of free inquiry inherant in Buddha's teachings. Buddhism is usually recognized as the oldest proselytizing religion (a religion that seeks converts). But it has never went around browbeating peopel into conversion. Traditionally monks and nuns would be invited somewhere to give a teaching. Or people would come to hear them teach. The Buddha was never in a hurry to convert anyone. And, as the quote above illustrates, he was usually quick to caution people and to emphasize the need to investigate further.This was my initial experience. The monks at the local temple let me do my thing. If I had any questions, they were there. If I needed any resources, they were there. But I never felt any pressure to join or become a Buddhist. Instead I was encouraged to simply learn more!
Wisdom & Compassion
"The non-doing of any evil,The performance of what is skillful,The cleansing of one's own mind:This is the teaching of the Awakened."DHP: 183
The first piece of Buddhist writing I ever came across was the Hymn to the Buddha of Infinite Compassion. It was actually only a small excerpt, but I didn't know any better. But I was immediately struck by the primacy of compassion in the Buddha's teachings.
A lot of people say they are pro-life. The Buddha said it and actually meant it. All life is precious and to be valued. That little spider that you despise so much, wants to live just as much as you do. It was so refreshing to find a noble teacher who truly believed that life--all life--is sacred.
There is no such thing as a just war in Buddhism. And yet the Buddha was not naive about violence. You can see his wise approach to violence in many of the martial arts traditions in Asia. Self-defense is the key. And usually there is a strong emphasis on doing your best not to harm your opponent, or to cause as little harm as possible.
To my joy and amazement the Buddha didn't simply emphasize compassion, he actually taught people how to develop these wonderful qualities. In Buddhism they are called the Four Sublime Attitudes: lovingkindness, compassion, altruistic joy, and equanimity.
The wisdom and compassion taught by the Buddha is simply amazing. Wisdom, compassion, the spirit of free inquiry, these are some of the salient features of the Buddha's teachings that led me to take refuge in the Triple Gem. The Buddha propigated a doctrine that appealed to both the mind and the heart. He encouraged us to think for ourselves. His teachings are to be tested in our lives. I pay homage to the Buddha, the Dharma, and the Sangha today.
Thank you.I hope you enjoy my posts on Buddhism. Below are links to some of my other posts:
Womenin Buddhism Part One Women in Buddhism Part Two What the heck is a Buddhist? Thai New Year Introducing Buddhism Buddhism in a Nutshell Right Speech The Buddha and the Christ
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|