MySpace
myspace music


DJ Abikai



Last Updated: 11/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: In a Relationship
City: Ada
State: Oklahoma
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/21/2007

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Congressman Ron Paul is the most conservative, grandfatherly man to
ever be admired by America's marijuana enthusiasts. On Friday night's
episode of HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, he reminded those who may
have been suffering an impaired short-term memory at that late hour
why, exactly, they should like him.



Speaking live from Clute, Texas, the libertarian-leaning Republican did
what few other members of Congress will and openly called for the
United States' War on Drugs to be abolished.



"What about when FDR came to office in '33," asked Maher. "One of the
first things he did was repeal prohibition. He said we can't afford
this anymore. Well, we have prohibition in this country. ... When he
was making radical changes he said look, we're serious now. We're going
to make serious changes and people like liquor."



"Well, in this country, people like pot," said Maher to a wave of
cheers and applause. "If we ended that prohibition, that would be a
giant pooling of money."



"I don't like pot," said the congressman. "But I hate the drug war, so
I would repeal all of prohibition. But, I wouldn't even bother taxing
it. People have the right in a free country to make important decisions
on their own lives. If they want to make mistakes, they can. They just
can't come crawling to the government to get bailed out or taken care
of if they get sick.



"I believe in freedom of choice in all that we do, as long as the
individual never hurts anybody else. So that means I would get rid of
all the federal laws. I would dispose with the drug war. We're spending
tens, if not hundreds of millions of dollars on this, then we march
into places like California, override state law, arrest sick people and
put them in prison."



"It makes no sense whatsoever," he insisted.



"Amen, stoner," joked Maher.





News Hawk- Ganjarden http://www.420Magazine.com

Source: The Raw Story

Author: David Edwards and Stephen C. Webster

Contact: The Raw Story

Copyright: 2009 The Raw Story

Website: Ron Paul to Bill Maher: America's War on Drugs Must End

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
So far, Barack Obama has indicated no penchant for pushing a drug
policy reform agenda -- his selection for Drug Czar, Gil Kerlikowske,
formerly police chief of Seattle, is an unknown quantity who has
neither espoused reform nor opposed it. Are those of us who seek
changes in the American approach to drugs whistling in the dark, or is
now the time to strike?



Drug violence is running wild in Latin America, particularly in Mexico,
and it is now spilling over the border into the United States. In
Mexico itself, violent drug-related deaths numbered 5,000 in 2008. The
pace of these murders has increased this year, with over 1,000 people
having been reported killed so far through February.



As a result of this violence -- and the widespread corruption and
intimidation of local police -- Mexican President Felipe Calderon has
called out 40,000 federal troops to combat the drug trade. When the
Mexicans speak of a War on Drugs, they mean it literally! Recently, a
Mexican general was killed in Cancun -- which most Americans still
think of as a vacation destination.



Worse still are the towns bordering with the U.S., where constant drug
violence rules. Ciudad Juarez (just across from El Paso in Texas)
stands out as Mexico's most violent city. But the drug war has spread
widely within the United States--including surprisingly far-flung
locations. The AP reports that Mexican cartels are operating in over
230 U.S. cities. Five men were killed recently in Alabama over drugs:
their throats were slit after they were tortured with electrical shocks!



Texas Governor Rick Perry has now asked for 1,000 American troops to
guard the border with Mexico, with special attention to El Paso. I
watched as former General -- and the Drug Czar under Bill Clinton --
Barry McCaffrey, who serves as a military consultant and news analyst,
was questioned about this step. McCaffrey was dubious about the chances
for success -- since, after all, the cartels are already present
throughout the U.S.



McCaffrey suggested other military alternatives -- the man knows how to
wage war, after all! I imagined asking him about the February 23rd Wall
Street Journal editorial by three former Latin American Presidents
(from Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico) -- which claimed that the drug war
had definitively failed, and was decimating the continent. These
respected men want to address drug harms, and since marijuana is less
harmful than he*oin and co*aine (except for the warring dealers, that
is), it should be decriminalized.



Shocking! McCaffrey would only grimace and sneer at this proposal -- he
certainly never entertained any such suggestion during his regime,
being matched in his intransigence by Bush Drug Czar John Walters.
These men (I wonder when we will have our first woman as Drug Czar) are
charged, after all, with combating drugs, not permitting their use.
Such a discussion is completely outside the pale in the U.S.



If someone were to confront McCaffrey and Walters with the current
rampant violence throughout the U.S. and Latin America -- "Well,"
they'd say, "it's not on my watch." Both men claimed great success for
their tenures. Walters was just trumpeting marginal reductions in high
school drug use as he left office. As for McCaffrey -- he's been out of
office since 2001 -- his successor Walters bollixed this deal up!



In the midst of this mess facing the new Czar, a California state
legislator from San Francisco, Democrat Tom Ammiano, has proposed
selling and taxing marijuana legally for those over the age of 21.
Other legislators immediately denounced the bill -- Republican Paul
Cook, of Yucca Valley, declared, "I think substance abuse is just
ruining our society." But you wonder if Ammiano's logic -- "why not tax
something which is already being widely used?" - will be more appealing
given California's financial woes. Simply taxing the $2 billion medical
marijuana trade -- a fraction of overall use of the drug in the state
-- would bring in an estimated $100 million.



Ah, I'm daydreaming. Any true reform requires U.S. government approval.
Barack Obama's got two young daughters. He quit drugs when he got over
his own identity crisis as a youth. Conservatives are already assailing
his economic stimulus package, and he hasn't been willing to take on
the risk of nodding his approval of gay marriage. So legalizing
marijuana is a couple of steps too far down Obama road. I guess we'll
have to wait for his Republican replacement!



Aww, I'll just go back to my pipe dreams.





News Hawk- Ganjarden http://www.420Magazine.com

Source: The Huffington Post

Author: Stanton Peele

Contact: The Huffington Post

Copyright: 2009 HuffingtonPost.com, Inc.

Website: Drug Policy Reform: Is the Timing Perfect, or Are We Ahead of the Times?

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Assemblyman Tom Ammiano (D-SF) announced the introduction of a landmark
bill to tax and regulate marijuana like alcohol and tobacco at a press
conference today.



"With the state in the midst of an historic economic crisis, the move
towards regulating and taxing marijuana is simply common sense," said
Ammiano. "This legislation would generate much needed revenue for the
state, restrict access to only those over 21, end the environmental
damage to our public lands from illicit crops, and improve public
safety by redirecting law enforcement efforts to more serious crimes."



The bill would save the state's taxpayers over $1 billion, according to
an economic analysis by California NORML, with additional economic
benefits of $12 -18 billion. California NORML | Dedicated to reforming California's marijuana laws! background/CA_legalization2. html.



The bill would provide for licensed producers and distributors, who
could sell to adults over 21. Producers would pay an excise tax of $50
per ounce, or about $1 per joint. Sales taxes would generate additional
revenues, bringing total tax revenues to $1 billion. Additional
economic benefits would be generated in the form of employment,
business and payroll taxes and spin-off industries, like the wine
industry, amounting to some $12 - $18 billion.



Last but not least, the bill would save the state $170 million in costs
for arrest, prosecution and imprisonment of marijuana offenders. The
result would be to eliminate such prohibition-related problems as black
market dealers and smugglers, grow houses, and pirate gardeners on
public lands.



The bill would not alter California's medical marijuana law, which
allows patients, caregivers and collectives to grow medicine for
themselves.



"California has the opportunity to be the first state in the nation to
enact a smart, responsible public policy for the control and regulation
of marijuana," said Ammiano. His bill is the first of its kind since



California outlawed cannabis in 1913. Only after being prohibited did
marijuana become widely popular, eventually being enjoyed by millions
of Californians. Due to soaring enforcement costs, the legislature
decriminalized possession of small quantities in the Moscone Act of
1975, saving the state's taxpayers $100 million per year.



However, production and distribution remained illegal, leading to
continued prohibition-related enforcement costs. Last year, agents
eradicated a record 5 million illegal plants, up more than tenfold in
five years. Marijuana arrests jumped to 74,119 in 2007, their highest
level since the Moscone Act. California has over 1,500 inmates in state
prison for marijuana offenses, ten times as many as in 1980. Marijuana
is reported to account for 61% of the illicit drug traffic from Mexico,
where prohibition-related violence has killed over 6,800.



"Tom Ammiano deserves credit for recognizing that legal taxation and
regulation is the only solution to California's marijuana problem,"
says Gieringer of California NORML, a sponsor of the bill. "Marijuana
users would happily pay taxes to buy it legally."



California NORML also thanks former Sen. John Vasconcellos for providing the original draft of this legislation.



Recent polls indicate that public support for legal marijuana is
growing. A new Zogby poll found 44% of American voters support taxing
and regulating marijuana, with support as high as 58% in western
states: http://www.norml.org/index.cfm? Group_ID=7806



Fact Sheet: Marijuana in California



Number of marijuana users in California:

3 million in the past year, including:

2 million in the past month, including:

500,000 - 600,000 daily users Estimated California consumption:

1 million pounds per year Inmates in state prison for marijuana felonies:

1,511 prisoners Number of marijuana arrests, 2007:

16,123 Felonies (sale & manufacture)

57,995 Misdemanors (possession) Total marijuana arrests since 1970

2.25 million Number of marijuana plants eradicated, 2008:

5.2 million Estimated value of California's marijuana crop: $13.8 billion.



California NORML is a non-profit, membership organization dedicated to
reforming California's marijuana laws. Founded in 1972, California
NORML is the only state organization devoted specifically to marijuana
reform. Our mission is to establish the right of adults to use cannabis
legally for recreational as well as medical purposes.




source: www.420magazine.com



Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
A new Rasmussen poll shows a plurality of the country still opposed to
legalizing marijuana, but by a relatively narrow margin, 40% for, 46%
against. Legalization is supported by Democrats and independents, by
men, and by voters under 40. Rasmussen doesn't give the wording, and
the accompanying article is written largely from a pro-legalization
viewpoint (Rasmussen tends to lean libertarian).



Under the circumstances, I'd be skeptical, but the CBS/NYT poll in
January got comparable results: in response to "Do you think that the
use of marijuana should be made legal or not?" 41% said "legal" and 52%
said "not legal." Current support for legalization is at what seems to
be an all-time high, but the numbers are consistent with the long-term
trend in Gallup polling.



(Gallup provides two other useful cross-tabs, by region and by
religiosity. Regionally, the West is the outlier, with opinion nearly
evenly split even back in 2005. Unsurprisingly, church attendance is a
strong negative correlate of support for cannabis: in 2005, fewer than
a fifth of people who said they attended church weekly or more, but
half of those who said they attended seldom or never, favored
legalization.)



Note that these numbers come against the backdrop of relentless
official anti-pot propaganda: not just from the drug czar's office,
DEA, and the DARE program, but even from the National Institute on Drug
Abuse. That suggests that a President who decided to change the message
might not hit a stone wall. And the age breakdown suggests that the
trend is likely to continue as the cohorts that grew up without pot
leave the voter pool.



Obviously, this isn't something the Obama Administration is going to
jump on, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a big move late in a second
Obama term or sometime in the term of his successor (assuming the
Democrats keep winning elections). If I had to quote odds, I'd say
about even money on legalization within fifteen years. As with the
repeal of alcohol prohibition and the creeping legalization of
gambling, I'd expect it to be presented at least in part as a
revenue-raising measure.



Substantively, I'm not a big fan of legalization on the alcohol model;
a legal pot industry, like the legal booze and gambling industries,
would depend for the bulk of its sales on excessive use, which would
provide a strong incentive for the marketing effort to aim at creating
and maintaining addiction. (Cannabis abuse is somewhat less common, and
tends to be somewhat less long-lasting, than alcohol abuse, and the
physiological and behavioral effects tend to be less dramatic, but
about 11% of those who smoke a fifth lifetime joint go on to a period
of heavy daily use measured in months.) So I'd expect outright
legalization to lead to a substantial increase in the prevalence of
cannabis-related drug abuse disorder: I'd regard an increase of only
50% as a pleasant surprise, and if I had to guess I'd guess at
something like a doubling.



So I continue to favor a "grow your own" policy, under which it would
be legal to grow, possess, and use cannabis and to give it away, but
illegal to sell it. Of course there would be sales, and law enforcement
agencies would properly mostly ignore those sales. But there wouldn't
be billboards.



That beautifully-crafted policy has only two major defects that I'm
aware of: it wouldn't create tax revenue, and no one but me* supports
it. On the drug-warrior side of the argument, even those who can read
the handwriting on the wall won't dare to deviate from the orthodoxy.
As we did with alcohol, the country will lurch from one bad policy
(prohibition) to another (commercial legalization). I just hope the
sellers are required to measure the cannabinoid profiles of their
products and put those measurements on the label.





News Hawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/

Source: Same Facts.com

Author: Mark Kleiman

Copyright: 2009 Same Facts

Contact: Same Facts

Website: Legalizing cannabis: is the ground shifting?

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
After studying the Pharmacology of cannabis/marijuana for some fifty
years and treating some 4 thousand patients, very little surprises me.
Over the weekend I did get the shock of my life.



I accidentally turned up the name Andrea Barthwell on my computer and
an absolutely incredible amount of garbage was regurgitated.



I had seen the lady on Montel Williams TV show about marijuana and his
own case of successfully treated Multiple Sclerosis. She was identified
as the Deputy Drug Czar for (Drug) Demand Reduction.



I thought she must be a political hack feather merchant pit bull attack
dog whose job was saying every bad thing she could think of about
medical marijuana whether it was true or not.



Actually it was Misinformation with a capital M. She had Montel’s voice
cracking in violent frustration at the end of the show. Montel is an
Annapolis graduate and Marine officer and those guys are tough as old
combat boots.



When I found out she was actually and M.D. I figured it was “mail
order” from Mexico or maybe Mars. She worked and spewed her poison
under Czar Walters and G. W. Bush for 4 years, 2002 – 2006, but she
actually resigned in 2004 to run for the senate seat won by President
Obama. Thanks be to God.





She graduated from University of Michigan Medical School in 1980 and
worked with drug addicts. She found that marijuana deprecation was a
good way to go with as many lies she could dream up. That’s what got
her to the White House at a damn good salary. She went all over the
U.S. spewing this poison.



She was finally outed by Peter Guither about 2007 when she was
fraudulently stating she was sponsored by a very prominent drug abuse
advocacy group.



Guither found out she was actually working for G.W. Pharmaceuticals the
producer of Sativex a medical oral spray cannabis/marijuana preparation
which was marijuana in liquid form.



Guither wrote, “She was willing to sell her services to the highest bidder.”



She still says, “Marijuana is not medicine, you don’t know what is in
it.” Well surprise, surprise, Dr. Andrea. Sativex contains the same
chemicals you decry as a “cruel hoax and snake oil”.



Even the LA Times headlined her speech there as “A haze of misinformation clouds medical marijuana”.



Michigan just legalized medical marijuana no thanks to her.





News Hawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/

Source: Salem-News.com

Author: Dr. Phillip Leveque

Copyright: 2009 Salem-News.com

Contact: newsroom@salem-news.com

Website: Marijuana Misinformation & Incredible Duplicity by a Money Grubing Mercenary - Salem-News.Com

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
A growing legion of cops and ex-cops has declared war, not on drugs, but on the war on drugs.



They call themselves LEAP ( Law Enforcement Against Prohibition ) and
they claim a membership of 10,000 ex-or current cops. One of their
number, a retired Denver policeman, brought LEAP's message to Billings
last week.



LEAP's pitch is simple and direct:



"As long as marijuana is worth more than gold and heroin more than
uranium, we will continue to have people willing to kill each other to
control the market, willing to kill police charged with fighting these
useless wars, willing to kill children caught in cross fires."



LEAP spokesmen Tony Ryan did the math for a small audience at the Mayflower Lutheran Church last week:



"When any drug is prohibited, an underground market is immediately
created. The risk of producing and distributing that drug artificially
inflates its value.



"The street value of a drug is 17,000 times higher than the cost of
producing the drug. When a rapist or robber is arrested, the number of
rapes and robberies goes down. When a drug dealer is arrested, the
number of drug sales does not diminish.



"All we are doing is creating job openings for hundreds more
entrepreneurs willing to take huge risks for the chance of receiving
even huger profits."



Fighting the war on drugs only stirs the prohibition pot at a cost of $69 billion a year, Ryan said.



Comparing the War on Drugs to the unsuccessful attempt to outlaw
alcohol in the 1930s, he said that we must end drug prohibition.



"When we ended alcohol prohibition in 1933, Al Capone and his smuggling
buddies were out of business the next day," he said. "The same thing
would happen to the drug lords and terrorists who, thanks to today's
prohibition, sell $500 billion worth of illicit drugs each year to our
children around the world."



LEAP members are often asked, "Won't legalization of hard drugs promote more addiction?"



A Zogby International poll asked 1,028 likely voters whether they would
be more likely to use heroin or cocaine if the drugs were legal.
Ninety-nine out of 100 said "No." Only 0.6 percent said "Yes."



Drug War advocates have always insisted that addiction would explode if
drugs were legalized. But that argument comes apart under the weight of
the evidence. While a poll can't predict actual drug use, it clearly
shows that most of us avoid hard drugs because of common sense -- not
fear of arrest.



And that's always been the case. At the beginning of the last century
when a virtual free market for drugs existed, use rates were lower than
they are today.



At that time the typical opium user was a silver-haired grandmother who
kept a bottle of Dr. Kilmer's Swamp Root kidney, liver and bladder cure
in her medicine cabinet.



Drug use and addiction -- along with crime, violence and corruption -
-- only began to climb after the advent of drug prohibition in 1914.



Isn't it time to end the War on Drugs? Let's turn addiction problems
over to the people who dealt with them effectively before 1914 --
doctors, nurses and health care professionals.



In 36 years of service as a Denver cop, Ryan was shot at and hit, cut,
battered and broken. A gash to the head demanded 18 stitches. He was
shot in the chest, stabbed in the hand and back and suffered broken
bones in a hand and a foot.



Ryan reckoned the wear and tear went with the turf. What he did find
distressing was the way the War on Drugs dishonored the "Thin Blue
Line," creating "a total failure costing billions of dollars while
making the problem worse and enriching drug dealers.



"Drug-enforcement activities are one of the highest sources of
complaints against law enforcement. [The War on Drugs] costs officers'
lives and ruins careers through corruption and a myriad of other ills
borne on drug-enforcement activity."



During his career, Tony received numerous awards from the Denver Police
Department, including the Medal of Honor, Purple Heart, the Merit
Award, and Community Service Awards.



Now retired, he continues to work as a Red Cross volunteer, active member and speaker for the Libertarian Party and LEAP.





News Hawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/

Source: Billings Outpost, The (MT)

Copyright: 2009 The Billings Outpost

Contact: editor@billingsnews.com

Website: Billings Outpost

Author: Roger Clawson


Friday, March 06, 2009 
If Pot Is Truly Medicine, Shouldn't It Be Standardized? Analytical Labs Wants To Test The Potency And Safety Of Cali Cannabis.



At downtown Oakland's Harborside Health Center, the hairy green buds
have numbers. The new nomenclature beckons viewers from within seven
gleaming glass display cases. Antiseptic white placards boast
authoritative black digits. Each stands erect next to a Petri dish of
high-octane "White Rhino" or "Afgooey Super Melt." They read: 7
percent, 11 percent, 18 percent, or 21 percent. Even 80 percent. "80
percent THC?" asks a potential customer. He's referring to
delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol -- the main psychoactive ingredient in
marijuana.



"That's a concentrate," reminds Stephen DeAngelo, proud owner of the
three-year-old collective. DeAngelo's facility boasts 20,000 members
and grossed more than $10 million last year. Even amid the recession,
lines are a constant phenomenon and DeAngelo is looking to double his
space. Hundreds of new customers sign up monthly, attracted partly by
the immaculate facility: its savvy, well-paid "budtenders" and $40,
eighth-ounce pot dosages. But part of the appeal is the new placards --
the result of a disruptive new service by Harborside's partners at the
Analytical Laboratory Project.



"For the first time in the 3,000-year history of human cannabis
consumption, consumers will be provided a scientific assessment of the
safety and potency of products prior to ingesting them," DeAngelo
announced in December.



In the months since, DeAngelo's patrons have enjoyed mankind's most
detailed product information thanks to the country's first commercial
marijuana lab. Arrest and jail remain a constant worry for him and the
lab's two owners. But they believe that if pot is truly medicine, it
needs quality assurance and dosage information. The Analytical
Laboratory Project wants to be the source of that information. The
lab's ultimate goal is to provide testing for half of the 300
dispensaries in California.



Behind DeAngelo, a cross section of the East Bay shuffles in and out of
the pot club's well-lit main floor. They buy briskly and nonchalantly,
as though it's a bank or a pharmacy. Powerful, normative forces have
begun to transform the $65 billion domestic black market in ganja.
DeAngelo and his partners want to be the custodians of that
transformation.



Indeed, positive hits for pathogenic mold are already changing grower
operations. "You smoke ten random samples of cannabis and you've most
likely smoked aspergillus [mold]," said Dave, one of the lab's two
founders. "It's in there, often at unacceptable levels. Now it's up to
the industry to respond. We also are not in a position where we want to
make enemies and piss people off. We want to see it happen in the best
way for the movement and the industry to kind of just naturally evolve."



While the distributed nature of California's cannabis supply network
obviously benefits mom-and-pop growers, it doesn't encourage quality
assurance. Consequently, Dave and his peers believe that some pot
consumers are in danger.



"It's expensive to test every single thing that comes through the door
-- that's the price you pay with a decentralized supply system," Dave
said. "But that's what you've got. You've got five pounds coming from
here and two from there and one individual. I mean, a dog walks in the
grow room, and wags its tail -- anything can be coming off that dog's
tail. It's gross. Fertilizers with E. coli. Compost teas that they
don't make right, anaerobic tea that has elevated levels of E. coli and
salmonella. It has to come. There's no way that this is sustainable.
All it takes is one story of immune-compromised people dying from
aspergillus infection. The myth that cannabis hasn't killed a single
person in 3,000 years is allowed to go on. Well, it's not cannabis that
kills people, it's all the shit that's in it."



Talk about a buzz kill.



Backstage in the bowels of Harborside, the air is thick with terpenoids
-- the pungent, unmistakable odor molecules of cannabis. Rick Pfrommer,
Harborside's hefty linebacker of a pot buyer, mans the "intake" room
where the collective's 400 growers wholesale to the club in eye-popping
one-, two-, or five-pound bags. Everyone from mom-and-pop operators
with their dogs to professional growers from Oakland warehouses wait
daily in an antechamber before being ushered in one at a time.



It is here, surrounded by file cabinets, computers, and posters
featuring holographic closeups of buds, that the medicine begins its
long road to the sales counter. It starts with paperwork and a small
plastic-bagged test sample. Analytical Laboratory Project cofounders
and operators Dave and Addison usually show up in the afternoon to pick
up the day's new samples to test. Both are in their early thirties, and
dressed casually. They have a mentor-student relationship with
DeAngelo, who is sort of a legend in these parts.



"He's older and he's this personality," Dave said. "We take a lot of guidance from him."



DeAngelo is in his fifties and wears a long-sleeve shirt, tie, and
corduroy pants with two gray ponytails peaking out from underneath a
little fedora. The Washington, DC-born drug reformer and charter member
of Americans for Safe Access moved out West in 2000 after founding and
selling the industrial hemp company Ecolution in the '90s. After the
passage of Prop. 215, which legalized medical marijuana in California,
DeAngelo grew medical cannabis but was shocked at the thugs running
dispensaries.



"They seemed to have more in common with buying drugs down an alley in
a bad city than it did with going into a medical facility and getting
medicine," he recalled. So after Oakland cracked down on such
facilities, DeAngelo decided to lead by example. "I couldn't think of
anything more important to advance the cause than to provide a model of
safe, affordable cannabis distribution that would be respectful not
only of the patients but also of the neighbors and the community as a
whole."



In 2005, DeAngelo began the process of complying with Oakland's
rigorous new permitting process. He spent $400,000 over eleven months
and received one of only four coveted permits. Harborside opened on
October 3, 2006, the very day the federal Drug Enforcement Agency was
raiding pot clubs in San Francisco. "I always expected I might face
that moment of truth, but I didn't expect it five minutes after we
opened," he said.



However, the cops never came to Harborside, and DeAngelo's facility
thrived. The place was well on its way to doubling in size and scope
when DeAngelo met Addison and Dave at a National Organization for the
Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) conference in Los Angeles in October
2007. Addison was a young grower, dispensary operator, and activist
with a wife, two kids, and a rap sheet. Dave grew up in New York, went
to Columbia University, dropped out to trade stocks and bought land in
Northern California. Jaded on hedge funds by 2001, Dave took a vision
quest to Alaska and ended up in Eugene, Oregon before being lured south
by medical cannabis. Both consider themselves black sheep of their
families. "Nothing surprises them from me anymore," Dave said.



The two friends wanted to make a living by making a difference.
DeAngelo wanted to give his patients better information, start
self-regulating medical cannabis, and break new ground in research.



"We were entrepreneurs looking for a good idea and something that's not
totally fucked," said Dave, who concedes no formal training as a
chemist. "This seemed like a really good fit."



But the work is still highly illegal, despite the Obama
administration's recent announcement that it will not raid cannabis
clubs in states that have legalized medical marijuana. Law enforcement
raids continue on the West Coast and publicity could draw unwanted
attention. But DeAngelo, Dave, and Addison believe in their mission and
say they have nothing to hide. They want to make a bold statement and
gain customers, even though the lab's two operators are only willing to
provide their first names at this time.



"The attorneys that I've spoken to have expressed a level of concern
about the safety of the lab and strongly advised us to keep it very
hidden," DeAngelo said. "Simply the process of collecting samples and
taking that to the lab and analyzing them -- there's several federal
charges that could be placed against somebody. The feds might very
well, if they find out the location of our lab, come and raid it, close
it down. In order to stick it in the gas chromatograph you have to
handle the cannabis itself. And handling cannabis whether or not it's
in a medical form or not is illegal under federal law. They also
consider, if you publicize the potency of a particular controlled
substance, they consider it a marketing effort for the controlled
substance. Then you're aiding and abetting the distribution of an
illegal substance."



Addison and Dave wanted to go though with it anyway. "I've lived the
last ten years on the tip of the spear," Dave said. "This is a
different flavor."



DeAngelo sees it as a crime of necessity. "If cannabis is going to
become an accepted mainstream medicine, this is a necessary type of
step," he said. "It has to happen. When the three of us met, it was
kind of a fortuitous meeting. And I agreed to do everything that I
could, and everything Harborside could, to help facilitate the project.
My belief is that cannabis is not only going to be an extremely
important medicine but a source of other extremely important medicines.
I think that this is going to change everything from the way
dispensaries intake medicine from people. It's going to change the way
that we sell medicine to people, it's going to change the way that
patients evaluate and make their purchases. It's going to change the
way that scientists look at this substance."



After all, it's already changing the way that growers look at it.



"Most are happy to hear about it," buyer Pfrommer said. "I've had to
refuse to take from current batches of stuff until people could clean
their room and go through a new run, and we got a couple of people in
that process now. The THC ratings are big, but it's already a big
competition amongst vendors to get their medicine in here. For those of
us that have been doing this for four decades, this is extremely
exciting. We've moved past the Cheech and Chong era of being treated a
certain way to recognizing the economic and scientific impact of
cannabis."



DeAngelo recently arranged for a tour of the small, garage-size
facility today as it ran gas chromatography, flame ionization, and mass
spectrometry tests on local pot.



Addison and Dave packed up little samples in a Tupperware container and
talk about getting a coffee on the way to the lab for the night's work.
While Addison weaved his rusted '80s minivan through Oakland's surface
streets amid heavy afternoon traffic, Dave details the history,
methodology development, and hurdles of opening a pot lab. They spent a
year boning up on organic chemistry, talking to Ph.D potheads in the
medical underground, buying gear, and practicing.



"Everyone was talking about, 'Oh, you can't do it', or, 'We've been
thinking about that forever'," Addison recalled. "But no one had done
it!"



Harborside provided the test medicine to calibrate the pair's
off-the-shelf lab equipment. First they had to learn how to set up the
equipment and run it. After a friend mentioned problems with
contamination in tobacco, they also added a test for mold. The duo did
not borrow any methodology from government labs, because cannabis
research tends to be locked away. "None of this came out of the
literature," Dave noted.



The East Bay's first pot lab looks like a bachelor pad with a locked
room in the back. The building is of recent construction with high
ceilings and stained carpets, mismatched furniture, and a congenial
guard dog, belonging to Addison.



It's a little cooler in the locked back room. The place hums like the
inside of a busy copy store. The lab's centerpiece -- the gas
chromatograph -- squats on a work bench in the back studded with yellow
samples in a carousel feeding into an auto-sampler. Inside the device,
a flame ion detector and mass spectrometer offer two different
snapshots of the prepared samples. Underneath, an $80,000 hydrogen
generator hums a steady supply into the chromatograph. Tanks of oxygen
and air also feed the device. Off to one side, a monitor flicks line
graphs. Books from Agilent Tech, Sigma Life Sciences, and Aldrich
Chemistry line the bookshelf.



Dave runs through the process of documenting and preparing the sample.
The gas chromatograph needs just a microliter-size sample to test; less
than a rain drop. So the lab's main methodology turns the sample
packets of green bud into a diluted liquid extraction. First, the lab
tech does the paperwork, and dons gloves and gear. Addison chops up a
half-gram under a sterile hood and places the sample in a vial, then
adds a controlled amount of Hexane -- a special-use solvent.



The mix goes into a sonicator, an ultra-sonic jeweler's tool. It
vibrates at a high enough frequency to rupture the cell membranes of
the plant. The liquid is then diluted to just hundredths of a percent
and an extraction is loaded into a little test vial.



Rows and rows of vials are then fed into the gas chromatograph on a timer. Inside the machine it's like CSI -- but for ganja.



"A gas chromatograph is not a detector -- it's only used for separating
compounds," Dave said. "The way it separates compounds is it uses
heat." The finely controlled oven can increase its temperature by just
a single degree Celsius over the course of fifteen minutes, which makes
it possible to measure the exact temperature at which a compound
degrades. Different compounds vaporize at different temperatures, where
they can be detected by the flame ionization detector and mass
spectrometer.



The mass spectrometer is way more sensitive and expensive, requiring a
library that you buy from a chemistry supply company to even decode the
results. This step took the longest, Dave said. "It wasn't too
difficult, you just have to socially engineer your way through a
chemical company," he said. "And it's hard to open any new chemical
accounts after 9-11."



The run takes ten minutes while agar plate cultures for mold will take
at least 48 hours. The whole process costs $100 per sample and the
nightly work of preparing samples and cleaning proves tedious. Lab tech
positions start at $15 per hour. "Mass spectrometers do not like to
smoke pot," Dave said. "They don't. They can, but it takes a lot of
maintenance."



Back in the front room with Addison's dog, wall maps of California are
marked with dispensary locations. The two have big plans for their lab
-- the first of which is to move it. But their process has several
flaws: cleanliness, trust, scalability, industry acceptance, and
scientific validity.



First off, Addison's dog cannot be on the premises, especially if they
are going to tut-tut growers about allowing dogs in their grow rooms.
The lab also has carpeting, which can be a vector for mold. Someone
from the canonical Journal of the American Medical Association might
rip their methodology to shreds, starting with the sterility of the
intake at Harborside. Addison and his peers say that about 5 percent of
the supply is contaminated with mold. But getting people to believe
their findings and change their ways at the cannabis sales counter will
be an uphill battle.



"We need a new lab space," Dave conceded. "We need more lab coats. We
need equipment that will make our methodology bulletproof. And that all
costs money."



Dave says that a respected yet anonymous chemist at Lawrence Livermore
Labs -- "a triple Ph.D" -- validated their methodology and process
three different ways. "It all came in very, very accurate. Commercial
labs operate with -- believe it or not -- a 30 percent variance. We've
gotten ours down to 5 percent, plus or minus, and it's appropriate for
medical applications."



Like most forensics, it gets the job done but it's not canonical science.



"Ultimately we need accreditation," Dave said. "We can only do it to
the best of our ability. We don't have literature to really stand on.
It's all an exploration and the best you can do. Generally, the THC
results can vary but not that much. Top-tier stuff doesn't come up in
the bottom tier.



"We're sort of like whistleblowers a little bit. Even though we're
friends and work with all of the other people, we don't know where
that's going to lead us. The industry itself is having an identity
crisis. Competitive forces are going to drive it to being an industry.
But that's going to drive it toward regulation, control, making sure
that the products are safe especially since they are being distributed
under medical auspices. And there's a lot of concerns."



Back at Harborside, in the fading twilight, supplies are running low
but the lines remain strong. Customers of every age, race, class, and
creed buy, peer at the data in bound notebooks, and sign racks of
petitions at the activism station. Others write letters to imprisoned
drug felons -- aka "POWs" -- or members of Congress. Free yoga and
acupuncture classes are beginning in a few minutes.



Elan, the dispensary floor director who asks to be identified by his
first name only, said most people choosing a strain of pot ask, "What's
the best?" He typically replies that it depends on what your needs are
medicinally, economically, and preferentially. Anxiety? Chronic pain?
How much do you have to spend? Concentrate or bud? The lab results have
become yet another tool for consumer choice.



"This is the sharpest tool in the workbox now and this is all alpha
phase," Elan said. "This isn't even beta. This is first draft all the
way around."



Elan said patients are using the new information to get less high and
more mellow, drawing correlations between the main psychoactive
ingredient THC and other non-psychoactive cannabinoids cannabidiol
(CBD) and cannabinol (CBN).



"We're finding out CBD has an extremely medical effect but a
non-psychoactive effect, and a lot of people really want that," Elan
said. "A forty-year-old businessman doesn't want to get high. He needs
the pain relief. They're able to do that with the books behind the bar."



Will, an East Bay resident in the advertising industry, said he met the
lab's results with a skepticism that's been conquered by time. "I have
more faith in this place than I do in peanuts right now, and I'm
becoming less of a pothead."



The 32-year-old Will is a closeted toker who came in a year ago for
migraines and because he liked pot. He found Harborside clean and less
pricey than many thugged-out places in Los Angeles. "I thought,
literally, 'I'm in Entourage. This is the cleanest pharmacy I've ever
been in. It's nice, clean, safe, and well-lit."



But trial and error with some of Harborside's wares left Will
super-baked at inopportune moments. So when the numbers showed up, "I
was like, 'Oh, what's this? Really cool. Is this for real? Are these
real percentages? How did you get these percentages?' And it helped me
quickly pick my price range. A lot of times you want a lower-price
medicinal marijuana that has a higher THC. I was questioning it for a
little bit but as I kept coming back and saw the numbers kind of stay
legit and not shift and things like this, I thought, 'Oh, this is
really nice.' I felt comfortable. It makes it easy. You have such a
selection that you want to look at it all and smell it all and it helps
you narrow it down."



"Ford," a longtime local grower, patient, and activist who was writing
letters to men and women in jail at the activism station, said the lab
is changing people's habits. He's growing a strain of pot known as OG
Kush and shows off pictures of his "babies."



"I'm thinking about bringing in my next batch for testing, 'cause I'm curious."



Ford said there is a lot of the marijuana equivalent of bathtub gin out
there. He believes that testing will cause growers to take more care.
"I've been involved and dropped out of bad operations," he said. "You
can't have your dog near the plant, man. Dogs and plants don't mix."



In the final analysis, it's hard to think of any system more
antithetical to the closed US drug-development system than contemporary
US cannabis production. Bringing the two in line means the annihilation
of one culture or the other. Which will win?



"Those two worlds are going to come together," Dave said. "The DEA has
to accept it, and we as an industry have to go to a model that is more
acceptable, more palatable for mainstream society."



The Analytical Laboratory Project is in the process of writing custom
software for a lab management system. "Ultimately, this stuff will end
up getting published, I think," DeAngelo said. "People are dying
because of a lack of research."



Within the next month or so, Dave said the lab intends to branch out to
thirteen Bay Area clubs. "If I had ten customers like Harborside, I'd
be a rich man," Dave said with a laugh. "We know them all, and they
want to do it." After that, he said, the lab will seek a special
license from the City of Oakland.



An independent certification system consisting of specific labels and
stickers is being developed for participating customers. Participants
will also have to consent to undergo occasional audits, in which an
undercover shopper obtains samples so that the lab can ensure that its
labels haven't been copied or swapped.



Dig it: Analytical Labs wants to drug test pot clubs.



"If you want to be part of the testing program, that's what you have to
do," DeAngelo said. "Because it's not just a marketing thing, it is
about collecting this research. So the research has to be valid, we
have to take these steps to make it valid."



Within a few years, the goal is to have tens of thousands of potential
research subjects reporting coded results on surveys, the testing of
tinctures and edibles, pesticides tests, and strain profiles correlated
to effect and illness.



The Center and the lab fit into broader plans for legal change. The
nonprofit Harborside Health Center gives thousands of dollars each year
to activist groups like NORML. A fraction of every lazy, pothead dollar
is being funneled into an engine for legislative reform.



"If every dispensary in the state of California would give the
proportion of the money that they take in to the movement as Harborside
does: the job would be done by now," DeAngelo said. "I want to see the
law requiring cannabis to match the reality of what this plant is."



Ultimately, DeAngelo and his partners seek to fundamentally alter the consciousness of cannabis use in America.



"No commercial research is allowed on cannabis before it can be
considered a safe/effective medicine but then the government will not
allow that door to open," DeAngelo said. "So we're just going to do an
end run around them. We've got the cannabis, we've got the patients,
and now we've got the scientific expertise. This is too important."





News Hawk- Ganjarden http://www.420Magazine.com

Source: East Bay Express

Author: David Downs

Contact: East Bay Express

Copyright: 2009 East Bay Express

Website: The Manhattan Project of Marijuana

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Therapeutic use of marijuana has a history spanning over 4,500 years.
The most humane and just approach to helping the sick requires that we
continue the availability of medical marijuana. Evidence supporting
medical marijuana for appetite loss, glaucoma, nausea, vomiting,
spasticity, pain, and weight loss is quite impressive. Evidence for its
use for arthritis, dystonia, insomnia, seizures, and Tourette’s
syndrome is also very promising.



Opponents of medical marijuana mention that other drugs are available
for each of these disorders. Nevertheless, people differ. We have
multiple treatments for almost every human problem. Some patients do
not respond well to other medications and need medical marijuana to
alleviate their symptoms. Many pharmaceutical drugs create aversive
side effects that these patients cannot endure. In addition, medical
marijuana is often markedly cheaper than these other medications.



Opponents of medical marijuana often point to dronabinol, the synthetic
version of one of marijuana’s active ingredients that is available in
pill form. The use of only one active ingredient makes dronabinol less
effective than medical marijuana. Many ailments respond better to a
combination of marijuana’s active ingredients rather than just one. In
addition, because dronabinol is a pill, it is difficult for people with
nausea and vomiting to swallow. Finally, like any medication that’s
swallowed, dronabinol takes a long time to digest and have its effects.
Inhaled marijuana vapors can work markedly faster.



Concern over marijuana’s impact on respiratory health is easily
remedied. There are no links between marijuana use and lung cancer or
emphysema. The associations between smoked marijuana and symptoms like
coughing and wheezing can be remedied with the vaporizer. The vaporizer
heats the plant so that active ingredients boil off into a fine mist
but the plant itself never ignites. The mist contains no tars or
noxious gases, making respiratory complications a thing of the past.





News Hawk- Ganjarden http://www.420Magazine.com

Source: CBSNews.com

Author: Mitch Earleywine, Ph.D

Contact: CBSNews.com

Copyright: 2009 CBS Interactive Inc

Website: Medical Marijuana Benefits

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
After staring down the barrel at California’s $43 billion budget
deficit for the past several months, rookie San Francisco Assemblyman
Tom Ammiano last week introduced legislation to legalize and tax
marijuana. A self-described “martini guy,” Ammiano rightfully
identifies California and the nation’s number-one cash crop as a great
revenue generator during a time when: “We’re all jonesing now for
money.” The time appears near for legalizing and regulating cannabis in
all its forms and uses.



Seventy-two years ago during the nation’s last great economic crisis,
Harry Anslinger, as Commissioner of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
led the charge to replace alcohol prohibition with cannabis when FDR
signed into law the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937. Tragically, this Act
also led to the demise of the highly versatile industrial cannabis crop
, aka hemp, with the last known legal US hemp crop farmed in Wisconsin
in 1957.



Today, science has increasingly shown the incredible value of the
species Cannabis Sativa L. which can be used as a medicine, in food, in
textiles, building materials, and as an energy source. But, for
years,we mostly heard it stigmatized as a “gateway drug.” Yet cannabis
is no more of a gateway drug than alcohol, tobacco, or sugar—and
studies have shown it is far less harmful than these when used
recreationally. Indeed, the time has come for a more sensible drug
policy and Ammiano’s legalization bill is a great first step.



The opposition will no doubt be fierce. John Lovell, a zealous lobbyist
for the California Narcotics Officers Association and myriad other
state law enforcement agencies, rarely meets defeat in opposing
legislation, and you know he’s on this like flies on…. From 2005-07, I
experienced first-hand going up against Lovell. On behalf of the hemp
industry, I helped shepherd then Assemblyman Mark Leno’s hemp
legalization bills through the legislature only to watch them
unceremoniously vetoed twice by Lovell’s buddy Governor Arnold
Schwarzenegger.



While 2009 is no comparison economically to 2007, legalizing all forms
of cannabis is much less innocuous than legalizing hemp. Handled
adeptly, Ammiano’s foray just might pay off, and in multiple ways.



Just take a look at the projected numbers. By some reasonable accounts,
if this legislation becomes law the state would save $1.7 billion
annually by eliminating cannabis enforcement and incarceration while
generating $1 billion annually from taxation. Add in the revenues and
jobs generated from industrial cannabis farming and manufacturing, and
the bill would seem to have legs. In fact, Ammiano is already garnering
support from the right. Build a large enough coalition, Ammiano, and
this bill will be formidable.



Back in the 70s, Schwarzenegger enjoyed smoking his cannabis. Yet he
conveniently forgot his affinity for the plant when vetoing the hemp
bills. Later this year, redemption might be in the offing if Ammiano is
successful in moving his timely legislation through the legislature to
the Governor’s desk. To do so, he will need to shake loose the grip of
Lovell and the old drug warriors. Read the tea leaves Arnold: the
cannabis plant’s time has come.



Kindly terminate Ansliger and Lovell’s tired zealotry in California
thereby returning rationality to our drug and agriculture policy. Sign
Ammiano’s bill, Governor, and help end the cannabis prohibition now.





News Hawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/

Source: FogCityJournal.com

Author: Patrick Goggin

Copyright: 2009 FogCityJournal.com

Contact: Patrick Goggin | Fog City Journal

Website: No Better Time to End Cannabis Prohibition | Fog City Journal

Friday, March 06, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
The Obama administration has taken an important step to protect
patients in the 13 states with medical marijuana laws. Atty. Gen. Eric
H. Holder Jr. confirmed last week that his Department of Justice will
uphold President Obama's campaign promise to end Drug Enforcement
Administration raids of medical marijuana dispensaries in California.
The Bush administration's DEA unleashed hundreds of commando-style
raids that intimidated and terrorized patients, providers and
caregivers while undermining the capacity of states to defend popular
medical marijuana laws they had enacted since 1996. The Obama White
House has ended the reign of terror.



But this cease-fire isn't enough.



For medical marijuana patients and their advocates, it's crucial that
the Obama administration and Congress acknowledge the value of
marijuana as medicine and foster an open, honest discussion about how
the federal government can best regulate its use. In particular, the
feds should remove marijuana from the list of Schedule I drugs.



The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 created five schedules for all
illicit and prescription drugs. Marijuana wound up in Schedule I,
defining it as having a high potential for abuse and no acceptable
medical use. Placing marijuana under Schedule I federally criminalized
its use as a medicine and severely restricted research into its
medicinal value. Nonetheless, there is increasing consensus among
medical professionals that marijuana provides substantial therapeutic
benefits for a number of conditions, including AIDS, hepatitis C,
glaucoma, cancer, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy and chronic pain.



To date, 13 states have embraced those findings, rejected the
inflexible federal position and taken matters into their own hands. The
vast majority of those states adopted medical marijuana laws by ballot
initiative, many by a landslide. Every state polled has shown a
significant majority of voters in favor of legalizing medical
marijuana. Within a year, those 13 states may be joined by as many as
six others that are considering medical marijuana legislation or
initiatives. Quite simply, most Americans -- including our president --
agree that when a loved one is seriously ill, he or she deserves access
to medical marijuana if a doctor recommends it.



The placement of marijuana under Schedule I makes no sense for a drug
that is being recommended by doctors from Alaska to Vermont. As The
Times editorialized Feb. 25, marijuana "is not nearly as addictive or
intoxicating as less-restricted Schedule 2 drugs such as cocaine and
methamphetamine. Moreover, the active ingredient in marijuana, THC, can
be sold in pill form as a Schedule 3 drug. So what makes the plant so
dangerous?"



The Obama administration has signaled its intention to use a
public-health approach to drug policy in general. Medical marijuana is
the perfect opportunity to illustrate that sensible new posture. By
ending the raids on dispensaries in California, the administration has
taken a big step toward protecting Americans who benefit from the
medicinal properties of marijuana. But this policy is far too
impermanent and leaves far too many Americans outside medical marijuana
states unprotected. It's time to reschedule marijuana and make it
available as a medicine to all those in need.





News Hawk: User: http://www.420magazine.com/

Source: Los Angeles Times

Author: Stephen Gutwillig

Copyright: 2009 Los Angeles Times

Contact: How to Contact the Los Angeles Times - Los Angeles Times

Website: A fleeting change in pot policy? - Los Angeles Times