How hard is it to keep a band together for 25 years? Apparently pretty hard!
Cruising the interwebs tonight, I saw a press photo of U2, with Bono jumping around and Larry smiling like he's still 17 instead of 40-whatever. And it got me and Steven thinking. How many bands can say that they're still around, still putting out records, with the same exact lineup that started the thing?
A band is like a marriage, and while many end in divorce, we salute the ones that go the distance. Sooo....
How many bands can you name that ...
1) Have been together for at least 25 continuous years
2) Have the original lineup still intact
and
3) Are still putting out new music?
This was harder than it might appear at first blush.
The Beatles? Only ten years. Not even worth mentioning, really.
Cheap Trick? Replaced their bass player in the mid-80s, and while he did rejoin, we think this violates the spirit of the thing.
Bad Religion? Please. The list of former band members has its own
Wikipedia entry.
Now, if a band broke up in the early 90s but has reformed and is putting out nostalgia product, it does
NOT count. This is the Poison exclusion.
* If a band had a little problem with its arms or its noses but has managed to put all that behind it and meets all the other criteria for the last quarter-century, it
MAY count. This is the Aerosmith codicil.
* If someone dies, and is replaced but the overall spirit is observed, this band
MAY county. This is the Def Leppard exception. I mean, come on. They didn't even kick out their drummer after he lost a fucking arm, for chrissakes. If Steve Clarke were alive today, we have no doubt he would be taking the stage with Joe Elliott et al. This exception also applies to Queen.
* If, in their formative years, up to and including the release of their first record, a band makes a lineup change that fundamentally created their defining sound, this band
MAY count. This is the Rush addendum.
It doean't seem like such a lot to ask. Sure, like a 50-year marriage, it's rare, but it happens. Doesn't it? So we wracked our brains and reviewed our CD collection and came up with ...
U2
And then the four bands listed above, all exceptions and limitations to apply.
This is the kind of thing Steven and I do with our late nights. So please, someone, prove us wrong. U2 can't possibly be the only band clocking two and a half decades with original members. Can they?!
Any verifiable suggestions will be added (with credit, natch) to an updated post.