MySpace

Various observations made in a snarky tone Edwin G Boring would be proud

Loki Motive



Last Updated: 4/4/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 28
Sign: Aquarius

City: Hales Corners
State: WISCONSIN
Country: US
Signup Date: 10/12/2004

My Subscriptions

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Sunday, December 28, 2008 

When I got my mail today, I noticed that one of the windows separating the entrance of my apartment building from its lobby had been bashed in. The reason and mechanism for this remains a mystery, though it is probably safe to assume that someone kicked it in given that the window was close to the ground. However, I would like to point out that this was not merely a broken window; the glass was almost completely removed from the frame. Either someone delivered a powerful kick with a very large foot, or the procedure took several shots (N.B. I'm not a forensic scientist so this could be utter nonsense). None of this etiology really interested me, though, the main cause for concern with the sprinkling of glass shards that now graced the carpet. I thought someone should know about this, so I called my landlord.

Unfortunately, as it turned out, my landlord was out of town. When he told me this on a voice mail, he added an 'obviously' to this, perhaps implying that had he been in town he would have known of the broken window immediately and fixed it. Of course, my landlord is incompetent so, although I realized the possibility of his being gone for the holidays, I thought it was just as likely that he didn't notice. At any rate, since I brought it to his attention, he asked if I could be so kind as to clean it up. Most people would consider this an inconvenience. Admittedly, a part of me was not a fan of the idea, but I knew that if I didn't do it, it would just lay there until he got home. More importantly, however, I considered this as an opportunity to clean up something correctly for a change. Despite not being a janitor for almost two years now, there is still a part of me that cringes when I see the disrepair of this building: lights out, carpet missing, dry wall cracked and on the floor, &c. Sure I couldn't actually replace the window, but at the very least I could clean it up. And so I grabbed my garbage can, my broom and dustpan, and my vacuum cleaner and set to work.

There were a few things I discovered while cleaning up the glass:

  • When the landlord cleans the floor, he apparently has no regard for the baseboards or the floor underneath the heating units. This was especially evident in the entranceway where the heating unit obscured an incredible amount of filth. Admittedly, it's a pain the ass to get under there, but it's not impossible.
  • The landlord also does not seem to understand the usefulness of vacuum cleaner attachments. I get that it's hard to clean some places and that the chairs in the lobby are nailed to the floor. That doesn't give you an excuse for never vacuuming in the corner. Sure no one goes back there, but the thick layer of dust that had accumulated behind one of the chairs should have made you grimace enough to encourage a thorough cleaning.
  • There are no outlets in the apartment building's lobby. This is just baffling. Sure, the lobby is not designed for much use besides standing around, but wouldn't you think it would be a nice idea to provide an opportunity for some electrical cleaning? As it stands, you have to prop open the laundry room door and unplug a dryer to vacuum. For those of you who may question my ability to find a power outlet, I confirmed this suspicion with the landlord who suggested the same method I used, though he did not seem particularly disturbed by its clusterfuckery.
  • And finally, the front door, the one next to the broken window, does not unlock.

That last revelation is the most important, and, believe me, I learned it the hard way. Before I embarked on my cleaning I had not realized this because I had propped the door open to get my mail, and had done so when initially sweeping the entranceway as well. However, after going outside in an attempt to bang some of the glass out of my broom, I just let the door shut and found myself rather stuck. Bugger. Normally this would just be an inconvenience (though obviously one that should be resolved), but today it was particularly obnoxious: it was raining outside and the only other entrance had not been shoveled. So I trudged through the rain and the snow and wondered how long the door had been like that, and if anyone else had noticed. And if they had, did they call the landlord? Did they too have to trudge through the snow to get to the back entrance? Or perhaps, they decided on a more direct route: perhaps breaking through a window, crawling into the lobby and then opening the door from the other side.

This last possibility seemed fairly unlikely. First of all, it seems like it would be way too much work when you could just go around the back, snow or no snow. Secondly, why the hell would you break the lowest window? It would make a hell of a lot more sense to break the window directly next to the doorknob so that you could just reach in. I'm not writing this off entirely, though: one can never underestimate the power of stupidity and inebriation.

But again, I didn't really care how the window or the door got that way. I just cared about the mess, and I had cleaned that up nicely. Yes, I had entered complete janitor mode at this point. If I had had some duct tape I would have put a piece of cardboard over the broken window. If I had an extra doorknob (and the know how of replacing the cylinder so that people wouldn't have to get new keys), I would've replaced the broken one. Hell, if I had a shovel I would've shoveled the back entrance. Alas, I had none of these things so I simply vacuumed the whole lobby, rectifying the previous vacuum shortcomings.

Sometimes when I wander through this building and look at everything that needs to be fixed, I have an insatiable urge to just fix it myself regardless of time or cost. There are lights that have been out for six months here. The landlord says that this is because he can't find the replacement bulbs. Man, well take one in to Ace and tell them to get you one. Failing that, replace the fucking light fixture. Dumbass.

While cleaning up the lobby, it occurred to me that, on a certain level, I really do enjoy that kind of thing. However, it can't be compulsory. My apartment is a mess, god knows the last time I vacuumed it. Furthermore, though I recognize what needs to be done around here, I'm not about to volunteer to be a landlord. This is partly because of the snow, when it's your responsibility to get rid of snow, you live in constant fear of the next snowstorm. I'm so glad to be relieved of that.

Rather, I think I'd like to be some sort of rogue janitor. I'll just wander the country cleaning up public places whose caretaker has slipped in to apathy. I'll saunter in, sweep up the dirt, shine those mirrors, clean those baseboards and be on my way with a whistle and a tip o' the cap. Make no mistake, however, this would not be for some altruistic purpose nor would it be because of some overarching cleanliness fetish. Rather, I would do simply to proclaim loud and clear, "That's how you clean a lobby. Jerk."

Monday, September 15, 2008 
My computer came back from Best Buy at the end of August with a new Wi-Fi card. Problem is, even though the Geek Squad made a more sensical replacement this time, they didn't bother to check whether it actually fixed anything (hint: it didn't). So after yet another 'expedited repair' I finally got my computer back, and it seems to be functional this time. I would offer another harrowing narrative of Weak Squadery, but everytime I think of it I get enraged. And besides, another technological snafu has reered its ugly head: Yesterday my cellphone broke.

I haven't actually had an opportunity to go to U.S. Cellular to get a new working phone, partly because of the rain, but mostly out of laziness. So to alleviate some frustration I've decided to present my problem here with another request for analogy. In this case, this comes through more as a diagnosis rather than as an alternative but equally absurd situation. Cell phone breakage isn't really that absurd, it just happens. Nevertheless, I'm trying to figure out exactly how to describe the state of my phone. It isn't actually dead, as the following symptoms will show, so I will describe its state, offer a few diagnoses of my own, and leave it up to the floor to elaborate.

Symptoms:
If  someone calls the front display will notify me of who is calling but immediatly hang up. I don't get a chance to answer it.
If I did get a chance to answer it, however, as soon as I open up my phone it immediatly calls up a seemingly random incoming call. It doesn't call it, it just gives its properties.
More problematically, the keys on the left side of the keypad seem to have forgotten their actual function and taken on completly nonsensical functions instead. These mostly depend on what menu I'm in, but suffice to say that they don't do anything useful, and usually only function to fuck things up. It is important to note that every other button on the phone functions normally, but considering that the important 'Send' button is on the left side, this doesn't really help me much. As a result, I can't send text messages (partly because I literally can't send them and partly because I'm limited to 73% of the alphabet), I can't check my voice mail (mostly because I can't type in my password), and I can only call people through circumventive means.

So, as you can see, my phone is not dead, it's just disabled. But how? I would like to describe it as a stroke. It does exhibit a lot of the symptoms of a stroke victim, the left side is either nonresponsive or does not respond in the expected manner, additionally it certainly seems to be a neurological disorder: input and output are muddled. However, at the same time I think it might just be a matter of insanity but, not being familiar with the DSM-IV I'm not exactly sure what disorder it has.

Suggestions?

Friday, August 15, 2008 
I'm going to try to make this as quick as possible because I'm at work.

I recently took my still under warranty laptop into Best Buy because I have been having some problems with the Wi-Fi antenna, and, more recently, the CD-ROM drive. The antenna has been a problem for awhile: when I turn it on the computer often slows to a chug. The CPU usage approaches 100% and most applications hardly function. As soon as a turn it off, everything is fine. Additionally the problem seems exacerbated or quelled depending on where I put pressure on the laptop itself. This has always seemed to be a hardware problem. Possibly a new Wi-Fi antenna will fix it, or possibly the problem is more deep seated. At any rate it seems obvious to me that it needs to be fixed on a hardware level. The CD-ROM, a new addition, will either similarly chug up the computer, or simply disappear. That is to say, I don't have access to it. Occasionally it will then reappear for no apparent reason.

So I took it in, told the Geek Squad my troubles and abandoned my computer for two weeks while they fixed it. When I got it back I was told they replaced the hard drive. This seemed odd but what was more infuriating was that they did not re-install the operating system. Installing the operating system is a pain but more to the point there is no way that they could have checked to see if they fixed the problem without re-installing it.

And, indeed they did not fix the problem. Though the Wi-Fi is slightly less problematic, it is still obviously there. The CD-ROM seems to have gotten worse. Because I don't have a car the whole affair is more of a pain in the ass than it already is. I can't simply drive over to Best Buy and yell at them, I have to wait for the kindness of others. More to the point, however, it annoys me to no end that I asked them to fix a problem and they simply did something completely different that had absolutely no effect.

I've been trying to think of a good analogy for this situation. For whatever reason it comforts me to transplant the absurdity of the situation to other venues. The first analogy I came up with, which my friend described as 'middling' was: It's like going to Qdoba, asking for a burrito, and getting a fork.

Personally I like it, but this morning I've come up with something, perhaps, slightly more relevant, though it's far more complicated: Let's say you take your car in to get repaired. Every time you switch the radio on, your left blinker turns on as well and your headlights start blinking. This seems to get worse when driving on a bumpy road. Also, recently your power windows don't work. So they take your car for two weeks and when they return it they tell you they've replaced the engine. Did you start up the car to see if that fixed it? No. Sorry we didn't have the time.

Now, typing that out, it seems less than clever. So I'm asking you, come up with something analogously absurd.
Monday, August 04, 2008 

Last night I had the romantic urge to go to the patio of a nearby café, buy a glass of US style absinthe, smoke a clove cigarette, and read Robbe-Grillet. I just recently discovered that this nearby café served absinthe, though it seems fairly obvious that they don't really know what they're doing. Everyone seems overly excited about lighting something on fire when I order it. This is one of those flashy things that never really works out very well. When I bought my own absinthe a few months ago I simply followed the non-pyrotechnic instructions on the bottle and had a very nice drink because of it. Last night, though, I got a flaming sugar cube which was quickly extinguished and sat rather hardened on the slotted spoon before the waiter dumped it into the distilled absinthe and stirred it around like coffee. I'm not enough of a snob to have sent it back, and anyway it tasted okay. I just don't understand the attraction of lighting drinks on fire.

After finishing the absinthe I decided to move inside. Though the absinthe was unusually strong, I could still read my book allowing me to conduct my favorite sociological experiment: How do people react to a bearded man reading a book alone in a bar? Usually the answer is: they don't, at least not vocally. However, it has occasionally sparked a conversation. Oddly this tends to happen when I'm reading Rabelais. It has nothing to do with the other bar patron having an interest in Rabelais, however, it just seems it's a coincidence. Inevitably, the conversation goes, "what are you reading?" "Rabelais." "What's that?" "He's a 17th century French author. It's goofy as hell," and then a completely unrelated conversation will ensue. Tonight, however, I had Robbe-Grillet, which doesn't seem to produce any effect at all.

When a bartender whom I had borrowed a couple cigarettes from the other night was preparing to leave, I put down my book and offered to repay her with a drink. She responded that I didn't need to do that unless I had been bumming cigarettes from her the entire night. It seemed to me that that was obvious and that my intention was clearly not actually to repay her for two cigarettes, but to have a drink with her. Either she was incredibly dense or she was shooting me down. I assumed the latter and decided not to press the point and respond with "Well you can buy yourself a drink then, I don't care, but how about you do it when located in this seat next to me?" Instead, I finished my beer and headed out. This place was dead anyway.

I dropped Robbe-Grillet off at home and headed over to Paddy's Irish Pub. I like Paddy's but they don't really have a very good beer selection, so I don't go there that often. What they lack in beer, though, they make up for in atmosphere. You enter Paddy's through its outdoor seating area: a tight alley cluttered with a Stein's Gardens and Gifts worth of bric-a-brac and plants. The inside is similarly knick-knacked, though even more confined. All in all its kind of like having a drink at Grandma's house, as long as your Grandmother is an Irish eccentric pack rat with a penchant for Christmas lights. Therefore, depending on the size of the crowd, it can be like having a quite drink while your grandmother watches Wheel of Fortune or it can be like having a grandmother themed house party. Last night it was somewhere in between.

I sat at the end of the bar and ordered a Strongbow and asked for a complimentary basket of snacks. The snacks are nothing exciting, just Chex Mix, peanuts, and peanut M&Ms, but its nice to munch on something. While doing so I tried to make out the luminaries of Irish literature that were featured on a poster on the wall. I was far enough away, and intoxicated enough, that unless I squinted I couldn't actually read the names but I could see the pictures. I got Flann O'Brien, Beckett, Yeats, Wilde, and someone else (Joyce must have been in the area of the poster blocked by a contraption of some sort). I did not get George Bernard Shaw, because I don't care about him but I did find out that he had an enormous fuck off beard.

After awhile an attractive smoky-voiced girl sat next to me and began a conversation with a couple of dudes in sleeveless t-shirts. It was difficult to tell the provenance of this group. I wasn't sure if she knew the dudes, or had met them on the way to the bar. They seemed friendly enough, chatting about how she got scared watching a horror movie and went for a walk, and mocking one of the dudes who confessed to having a recurrent nightmare, but some people like talking to strangers. I was also trying to figure out how the dark haired fellow who wandered in and out of the group fit in. I took particular interest in him because his shirt had what looked like an SS style Totenkopf on it between two flags. I never got a good look at what the shirt was actually trying to say, but having anything that could be construed as a Nazi emblem on your t-shirt, seems like a questionable fashion choice. I wondered if he was aware of the implications of his Death's Head. I decided not to ask, just in case he did.

Because I was paying attention to him I immediately noticed when he told one of the bartenders to fuck off for no apparent reason. Since it seemed rather unprovoked, for about a millisecond I thought that this was some sort of jocular salutation. That is until the bartender responded by telling him to leave. Señor Totenkopf did not particularly agree with the bartender's suggestion and told him so by swinging his fist in the bartender's general direction. As usually happens in any fight other than ones in movies, the punch landed rather unglamorously and stupidly. In this case it connected on the right side of the bartender's neck. I can't imagine that that part of the body was what the guy was aiming for, but it did seem to have the intended effect: pissing off the bartender.

Grappling that takes place on either side of a bar looks absolutely ridiculous: obviously nobody is going to get pushed in any direction considering there's a large counter between them with no intention of moving anytime soon. Probably because of this obstacle, the grappling didn't last very long and both parties broke off in opposite directions. Now Totenkopf decided that his best chance of getting the upper hand in this dispute would be to elicit the help of some sort of nearby projectile. He decided on a bar stool. Perhaps because of the awkwardness of bar stool tossing, his intended target had plenty of time to get the fuck out of the way. Since the path of the chair was not disrupted by a human being anymore, though, it continued on its merry way directly toward quite a lot of bottles and, eventually, a mirror. One might think that some breakage might occur at this point, but instead the bar stool merely knocked one bottle on its side and bounced onto the floor, making the whole scene that much sillier.

It was at about this time that several people decided that perhaps the bartender's original suggestion was, in fact, appropriate, and escorted the upset patron out the door, never to be seen again. The bartender left the scene to cool down, and I realized that somewhere in the scuffle my snack basket was overturned and I had lost some Chex Mix. As I glanced around the bar I realized the entire party had exited leaving me with a clear view of a couple way at the other end of the bar who both had a look that clearly said, "the hell?"

I've never seen a bar fight before. It seemed odd to me that my only reaction was basically, "well that was weird." It just sort of happened and then didn't. For whatever reason, I had thought I would have reacted differently. Since I was, basically, right next to the thing I thought briefly that it would have been nice if I had tried to subdue Heinrich Himmler. But I don't think I could have done much. "Hi, I'm Nathan. You don't know me, but could you possibly calm down?" Because of this personal acquittal, I didn't really have much to say. The bartender involved in the fight eventually returned to his post, nursing his neck, and acting as hard as he could to cover up the fact that he really fucking hates people sometimes.

For my part, I had a couple more Strongbows, went home, put a pizza in and woke up about six hours later to find cat shit in the corner of my bedroom, cat vomit in the corner of my living room and, most disturbingly, a pizza shaped carbonized lump in the oven. The first two make me think that my cat is stupid; the last one makes me think that I'm stupider. Thankfully leaving the oven on all night only resulted in me ruining a pizza (rather completely I might add), rather than the entire apartment complex. For your viewing pleasure here's the result of my dumbassery:


Wednesday, July 23, 2008 
 The walkway between the east and west wings of the library is currently being torn up for some unknown reason. Besides minimal noise distraction, this mostly means that I need to take a slight detour in order to get my coffee. Usually it's a straight path from the east set of doors in the wing that I work in to the west set of doors in the wing that has coffee. Now I have to exit through the south set of doors (which are right next to the east set of doors), travel around the work area and enter the opposite west set of doors. Sure, it's not that big of a deal, but when you've conditioned yourself to follow a path to coffee as well as I have, the most minor detour can cause some confusion. Similarly, anyone who usually exits through the east doors for whatever reason, I'm sure, holds just the slightest bit of resentment that they now have to think even slightly about how to exit the building. Routine is a powerful factor in annoyance.

  Of course, at this point there is a pretty strong reminder to adjust your path. Directly in front of the east doors is a post-apocalyptic demolition zone. Even a cursory glance in the direction you usually follow will make you stop and say, "oh, I probably don't want to go there." Yesterday was a different story, though. The demolition work only began today, but the area that was going to be treated was fenced off yesterday. Since I have such keen observation skills I realized yesterday on my trip to coffee that my usual route would get me trapped in a pen. At that point there was no indication on the east set of doors that exiting through them would be pretty ineffective. Instead, if you didn't notice the fences, your only clue would be an easily circumvented lock on the doors (that is, you can simply unlock the door if you really want to get out).

  Not being in the situation now, you may think those two clues should be more than enough to make people turn back without too much trouble, but it's pretty easy to miss things you're not looking for even when they're eight feet tall. On a completely different level, though, even explicitly telling people not to enter an area is generally only 50% effective. Whether out of ignorant obstinacy ("I've gone through this way a million times. I don't need to pay attention to any bright signs, even if they do tell me 'look out for giant hole.'") or just plain rebelliousness ("I can't go through that way? Fuck you, I'll do what I want!"), you're always going to get some dumbass who wanders into an area that they're not supposed to. It occurred to me that, whoever ordered the outside fencing should have rented a couple more lengths to put on the inside of the east doors. Perhaps in that case people wandering into that area would be reduced to about 10%.

  But no, yesterday they only had the doors locked. When I returned from my trip I noticed that one of the locks had been turned indicating that someone, indeed had wandered out into the pen. It's probably too much to ask that they would lock the door on their way back in so it's not surprising that they didn't. It would've been nice though. In this case, whoever stumbled into the makeshift cage had made it that much easier for someone else to enjoy the same fate. As I hung around the security desk, chatting with the security guard, I kept an eye on the exiting patrons to see if anyone would wander through the trap.

  It didn't take long, but I was amazed at the difficult the victim had in remedying her situation. There are four doors in the east set and she initially tried the furthest to, from my vantage point, the left. Since that was locked, she tried the next one to the right, the unlocked door, passed through, and began to wander north out of sight. It actually seemed to take way more time than it should have for her to come back. One would think that almost immediately upon exiting you would realize that you were trapped. In fact, it's kind of surprising that she even made it out of sight. However, this is a mistake that seems fairly forgivable. Her path so far corresponds with someone in the bliss of routine and that's fine, really. After returning to the doors, she first tried the door to the right (again from my vantage point) of the door she exited from. One might expect her to have simply entered the door she exited from, but even at this point I'm okay with her actions. You would typically expect all doors in any given set to open. However, when she attempted to enter the door furthest to my left, mind you, the door that she initially found to be locked and the door to the left of the door she exited from, I was feeling drastically less sympathetic. Why would you try that door when you know it's locked? Why would you skip over the door that you knew worked? So I stared in rapt attention hoping that she would make the obvious choice and go back to the door she had exited from, but I knew, somehow, that she wouldn't.

  And, no, instead she chose to stand there dumbfounded for a couple seconds and then defer help to the button that opens the door for disabled patrons. Of course that didn't work at all because the door it opens is the one she tried to exit the building from initially. After that failure she simply gave up and stood at the door looking in waiting for someone to help her. Why didn't she go for the door she initially exited from?! Fucking hell, she was standing right in front of it for Christ's sake; just give it a pull! I mean, even if she completely forgot how she got where she was, the least she could have done was try the two doors that she hadn't already figured out were locked. What does she have to lose?

  I couldn't bare it anymore. I had to leave. Sure I could have helped her, but this seemed like a problem that she could handle by herself. She was, after all on a college campus. Unfortunately this meant I don't know for sure how she got back in. When I left work, she was gone and someone was putting up bright green signs and taping the locks up. I couldn't help wondering if I should have locked the door when I noticed it, or perhaps I should have pointed out to someone that the should really have some signs up lest they wind up with an accidental student zoo in front of the library. I probably should have done something, because that evening I karmically wound up with a bit of door trouble of my own.

  After returning home from a bar last night, I decided to order some food from Zayna's, the local purveyor of fine, fatty late night food.  The food was slightly late, because the delivery guy apparently forgot something back at the store. I forgave him, however, because he informed me of this by saying, "I'm sorry, my friend…" and for some reason I find that endearing. However, the fact that I didn't find this out until I got all the way down to the door of my apartment building is somewhat important. Because it is necessary to unlock both the front door and the door to my floor (or use key to call the elevator), it is imperative that you always exit your apartment with the assurance that you have your keys. Even if you're just running out to let someone in, it's a good idea to lock your apartment door because that assures that your keys are firmly in your possession. So when I left my apartment the first time, sans shoes, I maintained the usual death grip on my keys. When I returned to my apartment disappointed, I lay down on the ground and placed my keys in the precarious position of not in my full possession. So when the delivery guy returned and rang my klaxon of a doorbell, I bolted up and out of my apartment and left my keys on the floor.

  This didn't occur to me until after the driver had left and I suddenly realized that I was literally trapped in my lobby. Even though my apartment door was unlocked, the door to my floor was obnoxiously secured. The elevator was no help and it's key calling mechanism only served to mock me. If I left the apartment building there would be no way to get back in, and besides, I didn't have any shoes so going to far seemed like a bad idea anyway. The whole situation bothered me more because I felt that there should be a fairly simple solution to it. After all, it doesn't seem like it's that unusual of a predicament, but damned if I could figure out how to get out of it anytime soon.

  I did call my landlord but he, of course, didn't answer. Besides the fact that he hardly ever does, it was also 11:45 on a Monday and most sane people are in bed. I could ring his klaxon of a doorbell, but because I found myself in this situation through my own stupidity I felt it rude to wake him up.

  The building was eerily silent. Was I going to have to spend the whole night here? After texting some nearby friends to see if I could possibly crash at their house instead of my lobby, I sat down on one of the lobby chairs and ate my entire order of jalapeno poppers. Then I ate two pieces of pizza. After awhile I went outside and had a cigarette, propping the outer door open with a running mat on my way out. This was mostly to have something to do, and only partly to see if anyone appeared to be awake in the apartment building. They did not.

  When I got back inside I felt I had exhausted all possibilities. There was a chance that someone might rescue me before dawn, either coming down the stairs or leaving the building, but I resigned myself to the possibility of sleeping in the lobby. I found the chairs to be a rather lackluster sleeping spot. Sitting down just made me brood, and curling up in the forced me to basically turn myself into a tiny little Metroid ball. With my dignity at a perilous low, I eventually just said, fuck it, and fetaled up on the ground. While curled up I wondered at how the situation could and probably would get worse. Having just consumed a rather large amount of grease I was kind of thirsty, but a more pressing point was the realization that I would probably have to go to the bathroom at some point. As you could probably figure out, there wasn't really a bathroom anywhere close. Would I have to prop open the door again and use the bushes? That would be unfortunate.

  After only a short time on the floor, someone walked in and I popped up with complete abandon to how this must have looked. My rescuer looked a little reluctant to actually enter the building, after seeing some reprobate apparently shacking up on the floor, complete with dinner on the table. Oh great, he must have thought, is this lobby gnome going to want to talk to me? Indeed I did. After explaining the situation and asking if he could please let me into the third floor, he seemed to lighten up a bit. I confessed that I thought I was going to have to stay there all night, but immediately realized how silly this sounded after it occurred to me that I had only spent about a half an hour down there.

 Perhaps this experience allowed me a bit more sympathy for the woman who got trapped in the library playpen. Had I written this yesterday I probably would have had less sympathy for her, or perhaps not. At any rate, I did realized that I too would rather quickly give up hope in the face of fairly lackluster odds. When I explained my predicament to someone this morning she said, "Geez, you went fetal after only a half an hour?" Okay, okay… it seemed like a good idea at the time…
Sunday, March 16, 2008 

This blog is going out to a specialized audience. A very specialized audience. It’s the audience that understands the title of my blog and knows what AACR2 is. The audience that has come across AACR2 22.14 before and, as any sane person would do, snickered with delight. Come on catalogers, you know the rule, the one that gives a specific for accounting for the authorship of a spirit of a book. It brings a smile to anyone’s face and anticipation for that one far off day where they just might come into contact with a book that would need the subfield c in a 1XX or 7XX field of (Spirit).

Using my hella searching skillz on the Library of Congress website I have compiled a small list of amusing MARC fields for books written by spirit guides. There were plenty of  books for notable figures like George Washington and Jesus Christ as well as a book detailing Benjamin Franklin’s and other founding fathers’ perspectives on slavery, but I enjoy the following examples. For those of you unfamiliar with MARC, I apologize. This blog will mean nothing.

100     1_ |a Garland, Judy |c (Spirit)   
245     10 |a My life over the rainbow : |b Judy Garland’s story as told to Lorna Smith.   
250     __ |a 1st ed.   
260     __ |a New York : |b Vantage Press, |c c1987.

100     0_ |a Mom |c (Spirit)
245     10 |a Just love the people : |b the family frequency / |c written by Mom through her channel, Sara Paddison assisted by Deborah Rozman ; illustrations by Sandy Royall.

100     0_ |a Zoosh |c (Spirit)
245     14 |a The explorer race / |c Zoosh, end-time historian through Robert Shapiro.
260     __ |a Sedona, AZ : |b Light Technology Pub., |c c1996.
300     __ |a xiii, 574 p. : |b ill. ; |c 24 cm.
590     __ |a LC copy missing some pages.
650     _0 |a Civilization |x Extraterrestrial influences.
650     _0 |a Human-alien encounters.
650     _0 |a Life on other planets.
700     1_ |a Shapiro, Robert, |c professional channel.
Friday, March 07, 2008 
I've started a new blog over on Blogger called 'Fellows.' You may find it amusing, or you may find it stupid. Here's the URL:

http://handsomefellows.blogspot.com/

For those of you that would enjoy some sort of context, allow me to explain. Working at the library has provided me with access to a glorious number of staid and silly portraits of authors and subjects of books. Generally stuffy old white men attempting to look important and appearing, at the very least, anachronistic at this point in time. Making photocopies of these fellows and pasting them up in my cubicle has provided literally minutes of enjoyment for both me and my coworker, Dan. However, it wasn't until Dan pointed out that a particular book with a portrait of Samuel Beckett on the cover inspired a phrase in his head every time he passed it. 'I can't help but think every time I see that book, "Samuel Beckett does not approve." ' Oddly, Mr. Beckett in this particular photo wasn't looking any more surely than he usually does, but Dan's confession inspired me. I photocopied the picture of Beckett along with a hastily scrawled piece of paper that said "Samuel Beckett does not approve" and gave it to Dan. It is still hanging in his cubicle as a monument of silliness.

From there we decided that, at the very least, we needed to find an author that did approve. Admittedly, however, this is a somewhat difficult task. The next inspiring picture trumped Beckett's disapproval by a wide margin. A portrait of R. Buckminster Fuller staring glumly into the distance inspired the immortal caption: 'R. Buckminster Fuller disapproves of whatever it is you think you're doing.' That phrase, sans picture, is now taped above my monitor it work as a perpetual reminder of Mr. Fuller's, or 'Bucky's,' implacable disapproval.

From there, captions branched out to broader emotions, such as Lionel Trilling's licentious advances, featured as the inaugural entry in the blog. Currently my endeavors at collecting fellows has gained new vitality thanks to an enormous Hebrew and Yiddish gift featuring many pictures of old turn of the last century Jewish guys with big fuck off beards and many other examples of the kind of indescribable something that makes me photocopy portraits and paste them on my cubicle wall. So I decided to start a blog and share my ridiculous hobby with the few people that will find it. And you.

So feel free to comment on the portraits, suggest different captions, or tell me you don't get it (believe me, you won't be alone).
Friday, December 21, 2007 

Yesterday Paige and I went to The Twisted Fork to try their provisionally named "Flaming Coffee." Paige and I both had a paper on Bestiaries due that evening and so we thought imbibing an alcoholic beverage would be the perfect motivation for writing. The Flaming Coffee is The Twisted Fork's new signature drink. It is a strong cocktail of Bacardi 151, Kahlua, and coffee. Here's The Twisted Fork kind of inaccurate description:

"First, we coat the rim of your glass with fresh lime and then dip it in sugar. Next, we add BACARDI 151, KAHLÚA and our own blend of ALTERRA coffee, plus a few mystery ingredients. Then we light it on fire and things really heat up!"

Since they actually make it at the table describing the process in full, the possibility of mystery ingredients is a bit slim. I honestly think they just didn't feel like transcribing them. Also, they don't light it on fire after everything is in there. It's not like you get a glass served to you with a blue flame dancing around in front of your face. The lighting is actually done when the Bacardi is in there and continues on with the Kahlua. By the time the coffee is added the flame is completely out. Here's a video of one of the waitstaff making the drink: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nYxRO47Q50

Anyway, it's pretty good. It's no Magellan and Tonic and I'd rather get a normal coffee instead of one slathered in alcohol and flame but that's just me. Also it's eight bucks. If I'm going to pay eight dollars for a drink I'll just get a Tanqueray No. 10 straight up. That way, by the time I'm finished I can forget about the stupidity of paying so much for a drink.

The Twisted Fork has a contest going on to help them decide a name for the drink. The original name was the Flaming Spanish Coffee, but that makes about as much sense as calling it the Flaming Liechtensteinian Coffee. The impetus for entering the contest is two Midwest Express tickets to... somewhere. So people that want to escape Wisconsin are encouraged to buy an alcoholic beverage as their ticket out of here. The survey includes several uninspired names including the "Twisted Coffee" and the "Rum and Smoke" (WTF?). It also includes a space to write your own name in. Given that the apparent operation of the contest is a survey, writing in your name is probably just a waste of ink but it is the most intriguing option nonetheless. Paige and I set to work to think of an innovative name that would never see the light of day.

It occurred to me that satirically associating the drink with its Muslim origin would be an, at the very least, amusing idea. After all, the tension of Americans with Muslims is widely ridiculous and ill informed. The cultural and scientific influence of the Muslim World is far more widespread and important than a few morons with bombs strapped to their chests could eradicate. I think, at the very least, the culture of a people should be remembered before demonizing them to make our military actions seem more sanguine. I thought the best way to do this would be to offend everyone in a pithy drink name written on a piece of paper that would quickly be thrown away. I suddenly thought "The Flaming Jihad" would be a good possibility.

After all, representing a complicated religion with one small misunderstood aspect seemed like a good way to make people uncomfortable. When ordering a "Flaming Jihad" one could not help but think about both the cultural impact of the Muslim world and the stupidity of representing it with an overused metonymic cliché. I was proud of my tastelessness and Paige seemed both offended and amused.

But I was not quite satisfied. After all the idea of Jihad is overused and I don't feel I have the specialized knowledge of its complications to accurately abuse it. However, when in the bathroom, I was suddenly struck with a much more offensive idea and one rife with satirical implications: "The Muslim Car Bomb." I felt I had suddenly crossed the line from offensiveness to complete and utter tastelessness. It was with some pride then that I returned to the table and told Paige about my idea.

Now, before defriending me, here me out for a second. First and foremost, I felt I could write that name down on the piece of paper because of the wide use of the just as offensive drink name The Irish Car Bomb. How that has survived in the popular vernacular is beyond me. Hey this drink has a lot of Irish stuff in it, what could we call it that would exemplify the traditions and culture that birthed the ingredients? James Joyce? Yeats? Something to do with Irish music or set dancing? Any of the plethora of elements that are inexplicably embraced on St. Patrick's day when everyone's suddenly Irish despite years of explicit American racism? No, let's associate it with the deplorable actions of the IRA. That'll make people feel really comfortable every time they order it, right?

At least the Muslim Car Bomb has implications more closely associated with the drink itself. Fucking hell, the drink is on FIRE at one point. The only thing bomb like about the Irish Car Bomb is that you drop something into it. I mean, that's bomb like and all, but it sure as hell isn't car bomb like. Maybe if the shot glass of Baileys drove up next to the Guinness and exploded the two glasses it would be more appropriate but there would be some logistical concerns with such a scenario. On a totally different level, the elements to a Muslim Car Bomb are such a bastardization of coffee that Muslim extremists would, at the very least, shake their heads in embarrassment at the sheer debauchery of it. I mean, this isn't just coffee with some alcohol in it, it's fucking set on fire. They bring the shit out to your table and make it in front of you. The coffee's kind of an afterthought to make the alcohol go down more smoothly.


Paige pointed out that my association of the name with the Irish Car Bomb wasn't quite accurate. First of all Muslim car bombing is far more current than the IRA's campaign. Though she didn't say it, there's also the concern of Muslim car bombing being much far more prevalent in the American consciousness if only because it directly effects Americans stationed in Iraq. Ordering a Muslim Car Bomb when your loved one has the possibility of being killed by an actual Muslim Car Bomb doesn't seem like something someone would actually ever want to do.

Of course, this is all kind of immaterial considering I would never actually expect The Twisted Fork to adopt such a patently idiotic name. In fact, if they did with unironic sincerity I would probably be the first to organize a protest if I could actually be bothered to do such a thing. Nevertheless I wrote the name down in the space provided, tongue invisibly planted in cheek. I included the parenthesized comment "Oh come on, like it's any more offensive than The Irish Car Bomb." Paige, for the record wrote down The Flaming Jihad. I would hope that The Twisted Fork would have the good taste to promptly throw both entries in the trash.

Only one thing bothers me about submitting the name: Without the vaguely specialized knowledge of the popularization of coffee originating in the Muslim world, the names are far more offensive as they don't have the possibility of being recognized as satire. Someone approaching the name without that bit of knowledge in tow would just scratch their head at the offensiveness. At that point I may as well have written "Y'all should call it the Nigger-loving Jew Faggot 'cause that's what all y'all motherfuckers are. Now gimmie a Bud Light." But whatever.

Maybe I shouldn't have put my name on the thing...

Friday, July 27, 2007 
Today I woke up sick. Pretty much, I was consumed by a lethargy that obscured all my other symptoms. That meant that I could fool myself into thinking that, as the day progressed, I would gradually wake up and transform into a fairly competent human being. Unfortunately I only discovered that that probably wouldn't be the case about five minutes away from my destination: At that point I realized that if I couldn't even stay awake while driving with the windows open, there was no way that I would be able to do so while sitting at my computer proofing MARC fields.

The fifteen minute walk from my car to the library certainly didn't help anything, and when I finally sat down and stared with complete nonconcentration at the cataloging program I realized that I had made a grave error in even paying the slightest mind to my alarm clock. At that point I thought a much better plan would have been to crawl under my desk and sleep forever. I decided I had better clock out first though.

This was really the unfortunate gravity of the situation. Sure I could punch out, but there was no way I could make the whole trek back home without falling asleep at the wheel. After I presented that problem to my supervisors they suggested that I find some quite place in the library and take a nap. In fact, they said, there's a small room in the basement break room that has a couch and would be ideal for the purposes. When another supervisor was pregnant she used to take naps down there all the time. Huh, I thought, there's a basement break room?

Indeed there is, but the secret pregnant napping room had apparently been remodeled with the express purpose in mind of not letting people nap there. In fact all the furniture seems to have been designed to only tempt you to sleep without actually letting you realize that dream. There were gray chairs with high impenetrable arms and love seats with the same. But at that point I didn't care, so I dragged a maroon love seat into the pregnant napping room, took my shoes off, shut the door, turned off the lights, and contorted my body into a position that sort of allowed me to be comfortable.

What that meant was placing my arms under my head and wrapping my legs around the arm of the love seat so that they could fit comfortably on the cushion of the chair I had set up next to it. Unfortunately I have a tendency to wiggle around in my sleep, which was not so much an option here. I had three positions which I could adjust myself to but none of them were particularly ideal. There was the aforementioned legs wrapped around the arm position, a slightly less comfortable position where I was on my back with my legs hanging over the arm and the totally uncomfortable (but still used) position where I was facing the back of the love seat with my legs basically sticking up in the air propped up by the arm of the love seat.

Thankfully, I was tired enough that it didn't really matter. I dropped into a fairly uncomfortable sleep for about two hours and woke up close to noon. That proved to be a problem as it was obviously close to the time a lot of people took their lunch and, therefore, the only time the break room was in use. As two people walked in talking about inter-library politics I realized that simply walking out in my obviously disheveled state would be cause for at least a little bit of uncomfortable explanation. I could wait it out but that could be up to a half an hour and there was no guarantee that no one else would come down within that time.

I had more pressing issues, however, I really had to pee. There was an attached bathroom (man, I should just move into this place!) so I put my shoes back on and used the facilities. I also made a half-hearted attempt to work my hair into less of a homeless person style. By the time I got out of the bathroom the conversationalists had left (possibly scared by the mysterious flushing of a toilet) and I was free to drag the furniture back to its original place.

I wandered back up to tech services and was told in no uncertain terms to 'go home,' by several people. After realizing any negotiations were futile I decided to take their advice. I was conscious enough at this point that I was able to make the long drive home without using my airbag as a pillow.

Hopefully, though I'll never have to use the 'facilities' again. Sleeping in that uncomfortable position reminded me of a sleep over in sixth grade where I was left with only one square of a couch as every other inch of the living room was taken up by boys. It was not a pleasant night.
Saturday, May 26, 2007 
Doesn't it?


edit: an attempt at reuploading the picture.