
Ah,
the heartburn of edits, critiques, and reviews! My baby, my baby is so
precious. I just know it's perfect. Really. Well, almost. No?
For
an author, there is nothing that stings so much as criticism of their
work--whether it is deserved or not. Any author who says otherwise
lies. Oh, we can be big boys and girls about it, but deep down, it
still bruises the ego.
If we are to present our best work then
that input is necessary because most of us are too close to our work to
see the flaws. Even minor flaws can mar our work and prevent us from
placing our best work before the public. The way I see it, there are
three stages of criticism for my work. (I'm not counting myself as I
should have done my own edits before it goes to the next stage.)
Count the number of times I used "work" in that paragraph! Talk about flaws...Critique
partners: When I have my chapter/section/piece that I'm working on
polished up to the best of my ability, then it's time to send it off to
my critique partners. Contrary to what some people think, it's not
their job to tell me how wonderful it is. I have family, friends, even
neighbors who can do that. No, their job is to point out the flaws in
my writing.
What is it with you and the head hopping?
Why are there nineteen characters in this scene?
Did you know that you used the word "just" twelve times in two paragraphs?
I have no idea what the first three paragraphs are about! Or conversely,
I fell asleep after the second sentence.The
critique partner is the first line of defense. She/he is the one who
puts the brakes on the runaway train before it completely jumps the
tracks. Rather than telling me how amusing/hot/sexy my writing is
(unless my scene just totally blew them away!) what I need is for them
to point out where and how I can improve. Otherwise, they are just
cheerleaders yelling
rah, rah.
After
the critique partners shake things up, it's my job to go back and fix
things. And when I've done that to the best of my ability, then it's
off to submissions.
Editor: If my book is accepted, then
eventually an editor will go over it with a careful eye and a big fat
red pen. Well, not really a red pen. In this new technological age,
it's all done on the computer with fancy hi-lighting and squawks of
protests in the margins. But the end result is the same.
Why does hero have three arms in this scene?Men are blond, women are blonde.
Fourteen "that"s on this page.
People are who, things are that.Not on the accepted list of alternative words for penis--use something else.There are fourteen characters in this scene. Cut some of them.
Why did the heroine suddenly turn into a whiney wimpy crybaby?
Sometimes, there are simply paragraphs of suggestions.
This
is erotic romance. Therefore, the hero/heroine should probably make it
to bed sometime before Chapter Sixteen. There is no sexual tension in
the story until Chapter Ten. At this point, you have a mystery with
romantic elements--not an erotic romance.Whatever there
is, the editor is committed to improving the author's book, so taking
the edits personally just doesn't work. When I received my edits and
final line edits, I always read through them immediately to make sure I
didn't have any unanswered questions. Then I left the computer, walked
around, had a cup of coffee and thought about them.
Until my frustrations were under control, I didn't
work
on the edits, because my best writing is not accomplished when I'm in a
temper. And sitting in front of my computer is not the place to get
over my mad, no matter how temporary.
Editors do not generally
set out to destroy the writer's fragile ego. Really. And if your ego is
that fragile, maybe you should find another line of work. Yep, your
feelings will hurt. But if you want your book to be the best it can be,
then get to work.
If you have radical differences of opinion with the editor, those need to be resolved before you make changes.
Believe it or not, the editor is not God. However, before diving in,
make sure you really, really want to draw that line in the sand,
because likely your book will not be published by that publisher and
you will need to go elsewhere.
Yay! I've made it through the editing process and now my book is released and I anxiously await the reviewing process.
Reviewers:
Reviewers are the toughest audience of all. They're readers, generally
not professionals in the writing field, but they know what they like.
And when they don't like your book, they say so in a
public
arena. In the Internet age, public has a very different meaning than
during the print age. A bad review will likely be read world-wide.
Ouch. It doesn't just sting, it humiliates. No matter what spin you put
on a bad review, it sucks.
But there are things still to be
learned from a bad review. Don't shove it under the mattress. Print it
out. Cool down. And analyze that review. What exactly did the reviewer
not like? And... are they right? If so, how can you change things so
your next book is better?
At every step in the process, the
author can learn valuable lessons and use those lessons to improve
their writing. Would I rather my critique partners pointed out the
flaws privately instead of hearing about them in a public review? Yeah.
Oh, yeah. But if my story made it through the entire process still
flawed, then that unflattering review may be the last chance I have to
learn something that will make all the difference in my next book.
So don't forget to thank them for their hard work. Critique partners, editors AND reviewers. They're worth it.
anny