MySpace

Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation (ANTaR) | Sea of Hands Add to Technorati Favorites
ANTaR



Last Updated: 11/26/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Country: AU

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Wednesday, November 11, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Thursday, November 05, 2009 
Monday, August 17, 2009 
Prof. James Anaya, the UN Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Human Rights is visiting various centres in Australia over the next two weeks. His task will be to report back to the UN.

Several thousand people and organisations in Australia (including ANTaR) have signed a letter to the UN Special Rapporteur.

The letter requests Prof Anaya to:

* encourage the Australian Government to respect and recognise the views of all Aboriginal people through new and genuine negotiation with Aboriginal elders

* insist that human rights principles as outlined in the UN Convention against Racial Discrimination be applied

* encourage the Government to re-instate the Racial Discrimination Act without discriminatory “special measures”

We believe that the strategies in the NT that will work will be ones which respect Indigenous people and engage in genuine and empowering partnerships with them. Current, belated efforts to make the NT Intervention legislation conform to the Racial Discrimination Act do not reflect this approach.
Tuesday, June 02, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
ANTaR (Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation) today urged the Australian and Northern Territory governments to urgently reconsider their remote Indigenous community strategy in the wake of criticisms by NT Labor MLA, Marion Scrymgour.

“When a senior member of the NT Government holds such serious concerns for her party’s policies, it’s time to go back to the drawing board”, ANTaR spokesperson, David Cooper, said.

“The NT Government’s “Working Futures” response to its review of outstations (homelands) policy, formalises the status quo of chronic under-resourcing of services to homelands, envisaging the slow death by neglect of these unique and under-valued communities.

“Families should not be forced to move away from established communities on their traditional lands in order to access basic services.

“The government is ignoring evidence that homelands deliver better and healthier lives for their residents. Studies in both Central Australia and the Top End show improved health outcomes in relation to lifestyle-related chronic disease such as diabetes, heart disease and renal failure. Homelands can also deliver better social outcomes associated with reduced levels of stress, conflict and violence.

“Homelands provide nationally-significant benefits and employment in remote environmental management. They have an as yet not fully realised potential for sustainable remote economies based on Aboriginal cultural and environmental knowledge.

“The demise of these benefits of homelands will be hastened by the abandonment of CDEP jobs in remote areas, which will see thousands transferred from work to welfare and the collapse of many Indigenous organisations and enterprises. This means real people being thrown out of work, loss of purpose and self-esteem and reduced family incomes.

“The focus on so-called ‘growth towns’ is appropriate if it is not at the expense of resourcing smaller communities. However, the strategy appears to be trying to make a virtue out of clearly inadequate government funding for Indigenous services and infrastructure, and the skewed priorities associated with the NT intervention.

“For example, only $20 million per year is being provided by the Australian Government for NT homelands, yet $180 million has been spent in the past 2 years on compulsory income management that has provided little discernable benefit and zero prospects for creating positive long-term change.

“A proper cost-benefit analysis of homelands would expose the lack of evidence and short-sightedness that underpins the current remote communities strategy.

“Shoehorning Aboriginal lives into mainstream futures that currently do not exist, while overlooking the broader impacts on, and needs of, all Indigenous communities, will not contribute to closing the gap. It will simply increase dependency and disempowerment.

“The current policy is profoundly disempowering, discriminatory and assimilationist”, David Cooper concluded.

Media comment: David Cooper 0418 486 310
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 
Today is Sorry Day (please see our previous blog post)

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids....

Monday, May 25, 2009 

Current mood:respectful
Category: News and Politics

Sorry Day is held on 26 May every year.

Sorry Day marks the anniversary of the Bringing Them Home report, presented to parliament in 1997. The day shouldn’t be confused with the anniversary of the parliamentary apology to the Stolen Generations on 13 February!

The Bringing Them Home report documents the past and ongoing trauma and struggles of many thousands of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people affected by forcible removal (the Stolen Generations).

It also contains recommendations to parliament. However, these recommendations haven’t been fully implemented! We think a formal audit of the progress of these recommendations is needed.

What you can do on Sorry Day

* Sign the online pledge book. This demonstrates your support for the Stolen Generations.

* Change your MySpace status to:
...is Sorry
...acknowledges the First Australians on Sorry Day
...supporting the Stolen Generations today (Sorry Day)

* Speak up if you hear people say racist remarks! There’s some tips on how to do this (and stay safe!) on the ANTaR website.

Where you can find more information

The National Sorry Day Committee and the Stolen Generations Alliance are the two national organisations representing Stolen Generations survivors. Please visit their websites for more information about the Stolen Generations and Sorry Day.

We've supported both of these organisations in the past and with their permission we're proud to be able to promote their work on Sorry Day 2009.

Sunday, May 17, 2009 

Current mood:  accomplished
Category: News and Politics

Respect campaign targets new relationship between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians


A new national campaign calling on all Australians to take action and commit to a new partnership between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians and non-Indigenous Australians will be launched today by ANTaR (Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation) in collaboration with The Body Shop.

The campaign seeks to communicate that the disadvantage and discrimination faced by Indigenous people in Australia cannot be addressed through funding and policy change alone. Underlying issues such as people’s lack of understanding and lack of mutual respect must also be squarely tackled.

The Body Shop stores nationally will promote the Respect campaign from 18 May 2009 – 7 June 2009 as part of their commitment to defending human rights and promoting Reconciliation in Australia. ANTaR has challenged The Body Shop to collect 20,000 signatures during the these weeks and to talk to as many customers as possible

Prime Minister Rudd, in his Parliamentary Apology to the Stolen Generations said that ‘the apology… is also aimed at building a bridge between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians—a bridge based on a real respect rather than a thinly veiled contempt’.

‘We expect the Prime Minister to ensure that his government acts on his commitment, voiced at the National Apology, to a new relationship and partnership with Indigenous Australians’, said Dr David Cooper, ANTaR Acting National Director.

‘But we also recognise that it is vital that individual Australians have the information and resources to play their part in creating a new relationship’, Dr Cooper said.

'There is a 17-year gap in life expectancy between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Improved healthcare alone will not close this gap. Other change is required, particularly in attitudes and behaviour towards Indigenous Australians', Dr Cooper said.

The Respect campaign aims to engage all Australians, particularly non-Indigenous people who feel at a loss for ideas on how they can contribute to removing Indigenous disadvantage. Supporters of the campaign will receive information packs with tips on further actions they can take and some basic information about Indigenous history and culture as a starting point for those who would learn more about the traditional owners of Australia.

ANTaR is asking individual Australians to join the Respect campaign by acting through four easy steps:

- Understand

- Acknowledge

- Be Supportive

- Speak Up


All Australians are encouraged to show their commitment and join the movement by going to www.antar.org.au or signing the pledge in-store at The Body Shop.

Media contacts

David Cooper: 0418 486 310

Janet Hunt: 0408 170 448

Wednesday, January 28, 2009 

Category: News and Politics

ANTaR opinion piece on the ABC website:

I can think of no better choice for Australian of the Year in this International Year of Reconciliation than Mick Dodson. Mick is a man whose achievements are myriad and who has earned respect as a leader from all who have worked with him. He's a straight talker, at times a tough talker but also someone who is at ease in any company, always self-effacing, always ready to share a joke.

These are quintessential Australian characteristics, some would say stereotypes. We are a country rich in stereotypes, perhaps none more so than those applied to Indigenous Australians, mostly as negative reflections on their character or worth. How significant then it must be for Indigenous Australians to witness an Aboriginal man of high achievement recognised in this way - a worthy representative of us all, but also a man true to his heritage and a fighter for the rights of Indigenous people - indeed for all people.

True to his nature, Mick approaches his new role with optimism and spirit, seeking to reflect on "how we might bring ourselves together more than push ourselves apart".

So it was with a great sense of disappointment that I witnessed Prime Minister Kevin Rudd categorically rule out Mick's raising, in the name of inclusiveness, the need for a national conversation about the date of Australia Day - a date that for many Indigenous Australians signifies invasion, loss and survival and acts to exclude them from the national celebration.

In this country it is a sad truth but a sure bet that swatting down Indigenous challenges to the status quo, however mildly framed, will resonate well in much of mainstream Australia. It demonstrates 'strong leadership'. In this respect Mr Rudd's response begs comparison with arguably the pre-eminent nay-sayer to Indigenous Australians of recent times - former prime minister John Howard.

The irony is that it was precisely because of Mr Howard's unilateral, outright rejection of the recommendation for a government apology to the Stolen Generations and their families that we had to wait over a decade for a prime minister visionary enough to make that historic but ultimately small step of a simple apology. So starved was this nation for a measure of justice that its impact was immediate and immense, delivering huge kudos to Mr Rudd both at home and abroad.

Yet here too, Mr Rudd's historic gesture also included a slap down for Aboriginal people - the rejection of compensation for the Stolen Generations, as recommended in the landmark Bringing Them Home report. But nowhere in either his apology speech or subsequently has Mr Rudd provided justification for why a single group of Australians, the Stolen Generations, should alone be denied the opportunity for compensation for the devastating impacts of past government policies on their lives. Or why Stolen Generations people should instead be expected to feel compensated by the provision of measures aimed at closing the considerable health and disadvantage gap experienced by Indigenous Australians generally.

While Mr Rudd's commitment to closing the gap measures is commendable and welcome, this is not compensation but simply government belatedly meeting its responsibilities to provide Indigenous people with services and treatment that have already been provided to the rest of the nation as a right.
In truth, Mr Rudd's rejection of compensation to the Stolen Generations merely ensures that it remains part of the unfinished business of reconciliation.

A similar lesson can be drawn from Mr Howard's rejection in 2000 of Indigenous calls for debate about a national treaty process - despite the fact that polls at the time showed that Australians were receptive to the idea. A decade on, settlement of the basis on which our nation has been founded, including recognition in our Constitution, also remains as unfinished business of our journey towards reconciliation.

Here, Mr Rudd's support for consideration of constitutional reform is welcome. However, as Mick Dodson has urged, the reform needs to be substantive, including removing existing racially discriminatory elements of the Constitution and ensuring principles of equality and non-discrimination apply.

Already in his brief time as Australian of the Year, Mick Dodson has provided us with a most important insight. He has reminded us that reconciliation is not primarily an agenda but a process. It's about relationships, not things, about conversations, not the exercise of power.

Top-down leadership that seeks to dictate what is in or out of the reconciliation agenda has never worked and never will. Until we can sit down as equals and freely engage in national conversation towards resolving the unfinished business between us, we will surely remain a nation divided and diminished.

David Cooper is the acting national director of Australians for Native Title and Reconciliation

Tuesday, January 27, 2009 

Category: News and Politics

Hello ANTaR | Sea of Hands friends :)

You probably heard on the weekend that Professor Mick Dodson is Australian of the Year. During his acceptance speech, he called for Australia to change the date of its national day (also known as Invasion Day and Survival Day) because it isolates Indigenous people.

However, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has tried to shut down the conversation by saying the date will not be changed.

Prof Dodson said that if we don't talk about moving the date, it would be "another act of exclusion" towards Indigenous people.

Today, News Corp is running a poll asking people if Australia Day should be changed. PLEASE VOTE YES to show Kevin Rudd that we need to have a national conversation about our national day: http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,24961907-421,00.html

Thanks,
Priscilla @ ANTaR


Wednesday, January 21, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
First published in The Age

MARTIN Luther King jnr's famous "I Have a Dream" speech pivots on the images of the sons of former slaves and former slave owners sitting together at the table of brotherhood and little black girls and boys joining hands with little white girls and boys as brothers and sisters.

It is these images of racial harmony and social unity, which at the time seemed so utopian and so impossible, that give the speech its eternal power.

Racial harmony should not be hard to achieve, as our personal experience shows. Each year in summer the Lewis and Frankland families spend important time together. The Lewises, who are not of indigenous background, travel four hours west of Melbourne to Gunditjmara country to visit the Frankland family. Our families spend time together and our children play together on Richard's traditional land not out of some guided reconciliation process but just because we have fun together. It's just a natural thing for us to do.

But as we contemplate Australia/Invasion/Survival Day we cannot but note how sadly unusual our situation is.

After 16 years of varying courageous attempts at reconciliation, buffeted and worn out by the harsh years of the Howard government, we are yet to hear an equivalent speech to King's in this country.

The apology last year was a move towards it, as was its more direct and eloquent predecessor, the Redfern Speech, but the sons and daughters of the dispossessed do not commonly hold hands with the sons and daughters of the dispossessors.

The dark fog of colonisation still clouds our relationships and the non-indigenous terra nullius blindness still pervades their vision of this land and its First Peoples.

And this cloud is always most obvious on Australia/Invasion/Survival Day — a day whose naming, according to which side you are on, is so filled with mixed emotions and contradictions. It will always be so as long as it happens on stolen land. There is much unfinished business between our peoples. Amid the disparity and misunderstandings between us there are shards of hope that might prick us into action but the fog holds us back.

But we too have a dream.

It is a dream that all traditional owners have their land back and may welcome others onto it.

A dream that every Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander person will see their many and varied cultures celebrated by all Australians.

A dream that every non-indigenous Australian can say "hello" in the language of the local First People.

A dream that every school flies all the flags of this nation and teaches the many cultures — First and other — of this land.

A dream that every Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander child grows up strong in culture and sees their culture honoured and celebrated by every non-indigenous child.

A dream of a nation with many treaties and a constitution that acknowledges and protects Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander sovereignties and cultures.

A dream of one nation made up of many nations.

Then we may see the health gap closed and the identity confusion of
Australia/Invasion/Survival Day resolved. Perhaps we will call it Achievement Day or Treaty Day.

But whatever we call it, hopefully it will be a day we will all own, a day on which we can all be proud and a day we can all willingly celebrate.

Richard Frankland is an Aboriginal activist, singer/songwriter, author and film director. Peter Lewis is the chairman of ANTaR in Victoria.