MySpace

SHOUTING FROM THE ROOFTOPS Blogging Against Injustice

AniMEL

Mel Maguire


Last Updated: 11/3/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 31
Sign: Libra

City: Scottsdale
State: Arizona
Country: US
Signup Date: 7/9/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
November 6, 2009 - Friday 1:56 AM
John Allen Williams served in the Louisiana National Guard for seven years before volunteering for active duty in the United States Army. He was discharged as a sergeant after his service in the first Gulf War, having attained the Expert Rifleman’s Badge, the highest non-sniper shooting rank in the Army. In 1987, while serving, he also joined the Nation of Islam.

Shortly after his discharge from the Army, Williams helped provide security for the so-called “Million Man March” in Washington, DC, which was spearheaded by the Nation of Islam. Directly after that he moved to Antigua, where he engaged in offshore fraud activity, returning to the United States sometime in 2000 or 2001.

In October of 2001, following the attacks on 9/11, Williams changed his name to John Allen Muhammad. He’d also brought someone back from Antigua with him–a young man named Lee Boyd Malvo.

On October 3, 2002, the Beltway Sniper began the infamous rampage that gripped the country for three weeks. By the time it ended on October 24, 10 innocent lives had been snuffed out and three had barely survived their wounds. After an exhaustive search that police remained very tight-lipped about, they found John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo sleeping in a blue 1990 Chevrolet Caprice–a former police vehicle–which had been outfitted specifically for the attacks. It had been modified so that a sniper could fire from inside the closed trunk.

Found on them was a Bushmaster XR15 .223 hunting rifle with a laser sight–which was linked to 11 of the 14 shootings as well as shootings in Louisiana and Alabama–and a laptop computer stolen from a shooting victim in Alabama named Paul LaRuffia (he survived his wounds) that had been previously unconnected to the Beltway Sniper attacks. The computer had detailed maps of all of the shootings they had committed and information from the news on their victims. Just a year after the crime, Malvo, who was a minor at the time of the shootings, was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and Muhammad was sentenced to life by the state of Maryland–but sentenced to death by the state of Virginia.

His death warrant signed this week, John Allen Muhammad is scheduled to die by lethal injection on November 10. His lawyers are trying to use all of the last-ditch tools they have to stop his death. I do not believe they will succeed. Even Virginia governor Kaine, who says he is against the death penalty, refuses to grant him clemency.

I have to ask all of those out there who favor hate-crime legislation on the basis that stiffer penalties will reduce hate crimes, since the vast majority of you are also against the death penalty…what makes you think that more time in prison will make a man think twice about committing a hate crime, yet the shadow of the death chamber won’t? How can anyone claim that more time in the clink will make a person reconsider a crime of passion while at the same time claiming that requiring a man surrender the air in his lungs won’t make him think again?

John Allen Muhammad deserves to die. So does Lee Boyd Malvo, minor or not–that worthless flab of human debris knew perfectly well what he was doing. Were it up to me, the surviving victims (to include the families of those killed) would each be given the opportunity to put a bullet in his body at his execution. That would be the only thing that would come close to being fair.

God forbid we violate his rights. Never mind that his victims weren’t given their rights; we would be uncivil if we didn’t make sure his rights were upheld. Sometimes I feel absolutely filthy when I read these stories and hear about how states either can’t or won’t give the death penalty. I feel as though the bad guy always wins when some bleeding heart manages to make a judge or jury see things their way.
Currently watching:
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Release date: 2009-09-15
November 3, 2009 - Tuesday 3:38 AM
The entire country has been attracted to the itty-bitty NY23 race, in which three candidates had entered: Republican Dede Scozzafava, Democrat Bill Owens and Independent Doug Hoffman. Hoffman had attempted to get the Republican nomination, but for reasons nobody has been able to figure out, the GOP endorsed Scozzafava, a pro-abortion, pro-stimulus, pro-big labor and pro-ACORN far-left winner of the Margaret Sanger Award. That was when Hoffman entered as an Independent.

The race took on monumental proportions and pretty soon the whole country was watching. Scozzafava had for a long time supported ACORN, then in the wake of the Biggovernment.com sting videos she said she’d have voted against giving them taxpayer support. She refuses, though, to distance herself from other groups, such as the SEIU and the Working Families Party. WFP is being investigated for voter fraud currently, with no fewer than 20 people finding that when they signed for what they thought was an absentee ballot, they were actually signing a ballot already filled out in their names–and entered for candidates they wouldn’t have voted for.

Newt Gingrich, after sitting down on the big, fluffy global warming couch with Nasty Pelosi, gave Scozzafava the GOP’s official endorsement. The controversies kept on, though. Not the least of those were Scozzafava refusing to debate publicly with Hoffman, then turning around and holding a press conference in front of Hoffman’s campaign headquarters during which she scolded HIM for refusing to engage her in a debate. The Republican party spent upwards of $1 million on Scozzafava’s campaign.

Shortly after Sarah Palin got involved, though, by backing Doug Hoffman, Scozzafava dropped out of the race. Then she generously repaid the Republican party’s backing and financing by–get this–backing Democrat candidate Bill Owens.

I’m pretty sure everybody tried to tell the Republican party that backing Scozzafava was a bad idea. Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, HotAir, Politico, everybody–all of the conservative bloggers who have traditionally been involved with the GOP–cried foul when they nominated Scozzafava. They didn’t listen. Now that she’s quit, we’ve been proven right. She’s defected.

The Republican party should listen and listen well. Conservatives are tired of the pandering to liberals and Democrats. The Democrats won because you couldn’t give us a true conservative, and the more you put folks like this up for us to vote for, you’re going to lose more and more support. Fair warning.

You deserve the payback you got from Scozzafava. You were stupid enough to endorse that pit viper in GOP costume, you deserve what she did. I’d rather have more independents than Republicans in office at this point because you’re no longer the party I remember from years ago.
Currently watching:
X-Men Origins: Wolverine
Release date: 2009-09-15
November 2, 2009 - Monday 1:39 AM
In the past couple of weeks, a defense appropriations bill was hashed out and finally passed, sending it to President Obama's desk.  He signed it.  What irks me about this?

Democrats tacked a completely unrelated piece of legislation onto the bill: an expansion of the federal hate crimes law.  The expansion isn't what you think, either. 

Oh, sure, it expands the definition of a "hate crime" to include those who are gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered, as well as the disabled.  It also includes those with disabilities (because we all know how prevalent hate crimes against the disabled are).  An act of Congress that was originally intended to protect racial minorities after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. now includes other groups who largely have few or no genetic indicators.

The reach of this new extension is incredible.  It flies in the face of Constitutional protections against double jeopardy by providing an in-road for federal courts to try people a second time for the same crime--both those who were convicted of crimes and those who were acquitted.  Janet Reno supported this exact same piece of legislation back in 1998 as a way to "give people the opportunity to have a forum in which justice can be done if it is not done in the state court."

This is expressly forbidden by the Fifth Amendment: "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

The same Constitutional Amendment that says we cannot be required to say anything that would be self-incriminating also forbids the government from coming back and trying us a second time after we've been found innocent.  The hate crimes legislation that Obama has now signed into law attempts an end-run around the Constitution and it's been something the Democrats have salivated over since the Clinton Administration.  It will have an unprecedented effect on criminal justice.

Here's how it'll work.  Say two white teenagers attack and savagely beat a Hispanic man (this actually happened in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania).  The victim dies two days later of his severe injuries.  Police quickly arrest the teenagers on information provided by many witnesses, and the perps all start spilling it.  Prosecutors go for the gusto: they charge them with everything they possibly can, including ethnic intimidation.  The jury acquits, however, refusing to convict the boys of anything more than simple assault.  The perps have been convicted of some charges, acquitted of others, and they'll be punished.

Not so fast.  Now, the new legislation gives the federal government the ability to step in and prosecute a second time. 

Congressional powers were supposed to be limited; the States were supposed to be the authorities on prosecuting crimes unless several states were involved, in which case the federal government would have the power to prosecute a string of crimes in one case.  This new legislation turns that ideal on its head.  Federalism is not supported by the Constitution, but Obama and the Democrats are trying to force it on us.  The Morrison decision by the US Supreme Court may have set the precedent, and this legislation may be scrapped after all--or it may not.

The original hate crimes law was protected by the Thirteenth Amendment, which gave the federal government the power to protect freed slaves.  This addition, however, is absurd.  What is more bothersome, however, is that Democrats have all but crucified Bush for the USA PATRIOT Act, saying that in passing the Act Bush "wiped his ass with the Constitution."  What do you call what Obama is doing?

Janet Reno said that hate crimes were especially deplorable because victims are chosen "based on who they are, not what they've done."  This argument is incredible.  How many crimes are committed against a person based on what that victim has done?  I suppose if my neighbor were to be mugged and beaten it would be because of something he did to piss someone off, right?  The woman I talked to who was raped for an hour must have deserved it because of something she did, is that it?  No.  Hate crimes are no different from any other crime.  In the event that I were badly beaten or killed by someone who did so because I was a lesbian, I would want that perp to be charged with actual crimes.  I would not want him slapped with hate crimes, because that places my life in value above others, and I'm not worth more than any other law-abiding citizen in society. 

The common argument I've gotten from some Democrats I know is that hate crimes are committed to terrorize an entire group, and that needs to be stopped.  Okay...then let those acts fall under terrorism laws, if it can be proven.  Hate crimes laws equal thought crimes laws.  Our founders would be mortified.
Currently watching:
The Laramie Project
Release date: 2002-06-25
October 26, 2009 - Monday 9:51 PM
Ever since election day 2000, we’ve heard nothing but “Bush stole the election!” Nobody has been able to prove this. They keep whining about Florida, and how the race was rigged, but the real truth has been stuffed down and ignored.

At 1949 Eastern Standard Time on November 7, 2000, nearly all of the major news networks–beginning with NBC–announced that the polls had closed in Florida and Gore had won the state’s 25 electoral votes. Trouble was, the Florida Panhandle was on Central time. Their polls were actually due to remain open for another hour.

Thousands of voters who had not yet been able to vote didn’t go. Some were standing in line when the announcement was heard and left. With the demand for a recount, even with the military votes tossed out Bush still carried the state. He won three recounts. In the aftermath, the Supreme Court of the United States had to intervene to stop Florida voting laws from being upended. Even a Democratic strategist admitted that Bush lost no less than 10,000 votes in Panhandle precincts where the announcement caused people not to vote. The media, quick to prejudge, cost Bush votes–but he still managed to eek out a win. The AP refused to concede that Bush had won throughout the whole mess.

Later, at 0216 EST, FOX News analyst John Ellis made his network the first to announce that Bush had won the presidency. Somehow, the same MSM networks that had erroneously called the Florida election for Gore an hour too early managed to make the Bush win all Ellis’s fault. According to them, his announcement made it a psychological thing, some sort of behemoth that couldn’t be stopped (at two in the godforsaken a.m.? Please!). Why? Because Ellis was Bush’s cousin. Then, with no proof at all, the MSM accused Ellis of giving Bush confidential inside information–something that was completely illegal.

They’ve never dropped it. Not one of them has ever been able to prove the accusations against Ellis, but they refuse to let it go. A Lexis/Nexis search turns up literally hundreds of news articles about John Ellis’s role in the 2000 election…and next to none about the rest of the networks choosing to call Florida for Gore an hour before their polls closed, with less than 2% of the precinct numbers in.

Most recently, the MSM sought to sully the name of another conservative, this one far more prominent: Rush Limbaugh.

Rush has always been an object of hatred for the MSM. The liberal-controlled press, normally compassionate to liberals with drug problems, bragged about “the permanent smirk” they wore after Rush admitted to being addicted to Oxycontin in 2003. Just a couple of weeks ago Rush put in a bid to buy the St. Louis Rams (NFL). The media jumped on the announcement with both feet.

Dave Zirin, a writer for a radical rag known as The Nation (but put forth by MSNBC as a sportswriter), was the first to malign Rush over his bid. He claimed to have heard Rush say “slavery had its merits.” The same quote was used by NFL quarterback James Farrior and was posted on NBC’s website after being regurgitated by Dave Schuster. CNN joined the charge when anchorman Rick Sanchez spit out a more complete version of the quote: “…slavery built the South. I’m not saying we should bring it back. I’m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.”

The next day, the only mention of the quote on CNN was made by Sanchez, and he only said that Rush had denied ever saying anything like it. Nobody had offered the date, time, or an audio sample to prove its authenticity, but it was out there, and a good number of people believed it without question. Sanchez defended himself by claiming–also baselessly–that other racist quotes had been attributed to Rush and a lot of people found it offensive.

MSNBC didn’t even post Rush’s denial of the quote. They didn’t give him a second thought. David Schuster and Tamron Hall only repeated the quote and swore up and down that it was legitimate. Hall’s guest on that show, on Tuesday, October 13, was Karen Hunter–and she took the attack on Rush a step further by claiming Rush had praised James Earl Ray (Martin Luther King, Jr.’s assassin) and said he deserved the medal of honor. Rachel Maddow parroted both quotes on her show. Trouble was, the only source from which the James Earl Ray quote was taken was a radically left-wing book by Jack Huberman called 101 People Who Are Really Screwing America (ripped from Bernie Goldberg’s book of the same title).

The “slavery” quote, which made it’s MSM debut with St. Louis Post-Dispatch op-ed writer Bryan Burwell, also originated with Jack Huberman. Burwell followed that bogus quote up with the following: “I know how those words play out in idiot America. They’re embraced as gospel.” The Post-Dispatch refused to back up their writer, but he wouldn’t back down. He went on to describe his article as “throwing a deck chair off the Titanic,” and made the first claim that Rush had a litany of racist remarks, thus making him unfit to own an NFL team.

When nobody–not Huberman, Burwell, Schuster, Sanchez or Hall–could come up with any proof that Rush had made any of those statements, the media spent less than 60 seconds on the idea that Rush may have been falsely accused. After that 60 seconds was up, they dropped it.

FOX has been the only network that has aired Rush’s demand that the accusations be retracted.

I don’t listen to Rush much. I really just don’t have the time. When he’s on, I’m at work, and I have more important things to do than listen to talk radio. What I do hear from him, however, I tend to agree with. And I find it stupefying that the MSM can all but try to throw a presidential election, blame it on a FOX analyst, and try to ruin a man with accusations of racism and hatemongering when all of it–ALL OF IT–is a crock of lies. I guess the quotes were just too good for anyone to do any source-checks.

Who needs the truth when we’ve got the media?
Currently watching:
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen (Two-Disc Special Edition)
Release date: 2009-10-20
October 21, 2009 - Wednesday 2:53 AM
The Obama administration has completely disregarded the First Amendment recently and made itself judge, jury, and attempted executioner of FOX News. Why?

FOX isn’t real news.

At least if you listen to White House spokesmen Robert Gibbs and David Axelrod. Gibbs personally lambasted FOX for the “type” and “fairness” of coverage, complaining specifically about the programming in the 5 p.m. and 9 p.m. slots. Notice how he went about that, though.

Glenn Beck is on at 5 p.m. EST. Bill O’Reilly is on at 9 p.m. EST. Gibbs was specifically referring to OPINION shows, but he excused himself from having to answer questions about the WH decision to castigate FOX by simply giving the time slots that they referenced.

Just this past Sunday, David Axelrod went on George Stephanopoulos’s show and declared FOX was “not a news organization,” saying further, “Other news organizations like yours ought not to treat them that way. We’re not going to treat them that way.” Rahm Emmanuel went further by saying that the Obama administration doesn’t want “the CNNs and the others in the world (to) basically be led in following Fox.” (I’d have to ask Mr. Emmanuel when was the last time he ever saw any of the other networks following FOX’s lead–they’re usually deriding FOX anyway!)

What the Obama administration is doing is reprehensible. Forget the First Amendment; they don’t like the hard questions being asked by the opinion shows at FOX because they’re asking the questions no other network will ask. O’Reilly, at least, was as hard on Bush as he’s being now on Obama, so it can be rightly argued that Obama just has his hidden G-string in a twist because he doesn’t like being questioned.

It gets better, though: White House aide Anita Dunn was captured on video at a Q&A session in the Dominican Republic back in January that the Obama campaign “controlled” the press coverage. I’ll have to post the actual clip when I get home–I can’t access streaming video where I am right now–but it’s becoming more and more clear that the current administration is dead-set on making sure nobody is allowed to show the truth.

Now there’s word of Democrats opening up an “inquisition” into reports of so-called “hate speech” in the media. There were anti-media protests in more than 100 cities this weekend, and I’m having a hard time finding facts about them (three guesses why, and the first two don’t count).

The current administration scares me more and more every day. And if anybody who regularly argues that FOX makes up its own version of the news, lies, or twists the facts, feel free to post evidence–links to FOX news reports and a link to support the claim that it’s a lie–in the comments section.

If Bush and his spokesmen had waged such a campaign against a single major network, he’d have been immediately impeached.
Currently listening:
3 Doors Down
By 3 Doors Down
Release date: 2008-05-20
October 18, 2009 - Sunday 8:58 PM
(WARNING: if you are easily offended by foul language, avoid the section in italics.  I'm putting the lyrics on this post to make a point, and since I guarantee your kids are listening to it, if you're still in denial, just skip it.)

At work yesterday, I made mention that there were a few specific rappers that I had no respect for and, in fact, would not mind a tussle with because of my profound distaste for them.  When I said this, at least three of my coworkers expressed their shock and asked why I so deeply disliked rappers like Snoop Dogg, Jay-Z and 50 Cent.

I'll first let their words speak for themselves:

"Yo what up, this murder def kill homicide nigga/I got two freaks/yo, watch yo fuckin' mouth, man..." -Jay Z, "1-900-Hustler"

"C'mon, I got that ignorant shit you need/Nigga, fuck, shit, ass, bitch, trick plus weed/I'm only trying to give you what you want/Nigga, fuck, shit, ass, bitch, you like it don't front" -Jay Z, "Ignorant Shit"

"Cause is probable/In and out the prison/We got soldiers/But you still gotta respect ours/We got more 4-5's and 9's than a deck of cards" -50 Cent, "Catch Me in the Hood"

"It was Kangols, Cazelli shades, Pumas and corn braids/Doo-rags on the waist, brass knuckles, switchblades/Ski mask to get paid, new shells to get sprayed/Hoodrats to get laid, money to get made/Yeah I had a dream/I was rich, woke up broke, gun in my hand/Sayin DAMN!/Dope cost sixty a gram/I got to find me a nigga, line me a nigga/And say "Give it up kid, before I put one in your wig"/Picture me thirsty, ridin 'round foamin out the mouth/Sayin "I don't get on, I'ma lay a nigga out" -50 Cent, "Curtis 187" (for those who are unaware, the LAPD radio code for murder is 187.)

"I'm hittin' you and ya niggas/Feel tha flame when I aim/For tha top of ya brain/See tha spark and tha bang/Nigga shit ain't a game/Do tha math or get blast/Bullets go thru tha glass/Go-thru-ya-ass, fast/And tha leather seat sittin' Ave/Nigga/It's not a war when there's casualties on one side/I ride!/Turn it up on you niggas after Jay ride-by..." -50 Cent, "My Gun Go Off"

"Motherfucker gonna die tonight/That's why I smoke weed, get high tonight/Cause I'm a no limit soldier/With TRU datted in blood/I went to jail for years, for movin', burnin' the drugs...kill, kill, kill/Murder, murder, murder/Ain't nothin' personal, tru/See it's all about respect..." -Snoop Dogg, "Ain't Nut'in Personal"

"I went to your house/Your girl came in and started cussing you out/You should have slapped her/In her face/I wanted to tell you, but it wasn't my place/I kept it on the low 'cause I know you/Was gonna check that hoe...this is what you made me do/I really didn't wanna put hands on you/But bitch you playin' with fire/I'm so sick and tired/Of loud-mouth bitches like you..." -Snoop Dogg, "Can U Control Yo Hoe"


I could post this garbage all day.  I cannot stand today's popular "rap."  It's not real music, and the lyrics are nothing--literally nothing--but hate, violence, drugs, misogyny and murder.  There is no saving grace to any of these so-called artists.  There is no excusing them, not for any reason--and saying, "it's the best they can do for themselves" is a cop-out.

We have heard activists both black and white (the white ones being bleeding-heart liberals) talk about how black kids don't get a fair shake.  They're locked out of a life because they can't get an education, they can't get jobs, and nobody will give them a chance.  Poor, poor thugs; they're just living the life that was handed to them.  We can't expect them to be better because we haven't allowed them to be better.

It's not just black kids.  And it's not just the poor ones.  If you're going to argue that it's the poor black kids who are put upon, though, then look no further than their idols.  Cretins like 50 Cent, Dr. Dre, Ice Cube, Jay Z, Snoop Dogg, and other rappers make a thug's life a dream to be attained, not something to be avoided like the plague.  Hell, Snoop Dogg released "Blue Carpet Treatment" as homage to his gang set: the Rollin' 20's Crips.  They glorify pushing drugs on kids, shooting rival gang members, maiming people, murdering them, raping women, beating women--and it's all acceptable.  The kids eat it up because society has told them that it's okay to want what they've got.  It doesn't help that some of the cops tasked with cleaning up the mess from these mini-thugs are into this drivel, too.  I know a few, and it's a characteristic I've made well-known I have no respect for.

Rap is the low-class culture committing suicide.  It's an entire group of people saying, "we don't care, we just want what we can get, even if we have to take it."  How will troubled black kids learn any better with this kind of leadership?  How will ANY of the kids who idolize these monsters learn the difference between right and wrong with their heroes graying the lines for them?  Yes, it is a travesty that blacks make up a majority of the prison inmate population in America.  I will agree with that.  But it's not racism that's the problem.  It's the tacit refusal to grow up.  The culture is killing itself by embracing the thug life.

Shelby Steele, a prominent black conservative writer (and one of my heroes), said this: "We then think that our whole future depends on keeping whites feeling guilty and keeping them on the hook.  The more we protest, the more dependent we become, the weaker we become.  We're weaker today than we were in the nineteen-fifties." 

I think that has a lot to do with those placed on a pedestal, those bastions of the "good life" quoted above.  Look no further than your own mirror, folks, for killing your own culture.
Currently listening:
Crash Love
By AFI
Release date: 2009-09-29
October 17, 2009 - Saturday 3:36 AM
Today, SSgt. Tom Rabjohn was laid to rest here in Arizona. His memorial was held at the same enormous NW Valley church where we honored Tony Holly just two and a half years ago. Rabjohn was deployed with his National Guard unit to Afghanistan in April of this year. On October 3, as he was defusing a roadside bomb, he noticed a sister device about to go off. He managed to get everyone else away, and paid with his life.

He was also a Phoenix Police officer.

One of his best friends eulogized him by saying, “he put his trust in Colt, Glock, Jeep, Keystone Beer, Toby Keith and Nickelback.” I didn’t know him well, but I saw what kind of officer Tom Rabjohn was while on duty myself, and after the first time I met him, I was always glad to see him on the street.

He served his country and believed in his mission. He was in EOD–Explosives Ordinance Disposal/Detection–and his job was to do exactly what he was doing that day in Afghanistan. I’m sure if we had talked to him about what he believed, he’d have said what every other soldier, police officer, and public safety worker always says: that he wants this world to be a better place, but he has no delusions that it will come without sacrifice. He paid with his life, and his wife and three daughters lost the center of their entire world. They paid, too, whether they meant to or not.

The song “If Everyone Cared” by Nickelback is one of my favorites. The chorus goes, “if everyone cared and nobody cried/if everyone loved and nobody lied/if everyone shared and swallowed their pride/then we’d see the day that nobody died.” It’s a truth those of us who are capable of love wish more than anything we could make reality. And though I didn’t know him well, I can say with confidence that SSgt. Rabjohn likely wished with all his might that he could make it reality.

But the coldness of the reality we all live with every day, the reality I see etched in the lines on the faces of the police officers, firefighters and EMT’s I work with, is far crueler than most people will ever be willing to accept. The majority of the population only knows the dramatizations that they see on prime-time television. Many will never be directly touched by the evil in this world, a fact that may be a double-edged blade. While I’m glad that our society is still holding on to right and wrong somewhere deep in our psyche, it seems that most of those who want to ban guns, stop all wars, and believe that utopia is attainable are often those who have never experienced the deepest darkness that a human being can experience.

Tom Rabjohn loved his country. Despite what so many Americans are unwilling to accept about Afghanistan, he served with distinction. And while here at home he served our city with a quiet dignity that those who are quick to cry “police brutality” will never believe. If everyone cared, we would never have to see a sight like the one that left a hole in the City of Phoenix today–that of a good man being laid to rest, having died a true hero to help save us from the evil that so many refuse to believe exists.

Thomas Rabjohn, PPD badge #7803, you did a good job. I promise we won’t let you down. And to Nikki Rabjohn, and Kylee, Koree and Kelsee, our hearts are with you. I know none of us can never wish more than you that this world wasn’t the place where Tom had to face evil so we didn’t have to.
October 14, 2009 - Wednesday 3:53 AM
So I was perusing the newest poll questions on Facebook (you can find me both there and on Myspace via my name, Mel Maguire, or my email address, animelmaguire@gmail.com), and came across one that nearly made me snort my protein shake all over the keyboard. It gave me a mixture of utter shock and hysterical laughter. Here was the question:

“Do you think Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck are traitors and should be tried and put in prison?”

If the question wasn’t loaded enough, here were the possible responses (I kid you not, this was word-for-word):

A. Hell Yes
B. Yes
C. No
D. Hell no, I am stupid and believe everything they say

Now, there was a little bit of talk about traitorism after 9/11 and what constitutes a traitor. Some Republicans even went as far as suggesting that those who wouldn’t support the troops were un-American. But how often did we ever suggest, with a straight face, that protesters who peacefully exercised their First Amendment rights be tried for treason and tossed in the clink?

I can’t think of one. Even Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck didn’t go that far. Hell, Hannity invites those guys onto his show on a nightly basis, and he’s NICE to them. What kills me is that the snot-nosed little brat who wrote this poll question for Facebook users isn’t the first person I’ve heard such a ludicrous idea from. I’ve heard people I thought to be fairly level-headed say these kind of things out loud.

I have to ask the liberals out there who agree with this nonsense: what, pray tell, makes these guys traitors? I’ve said things far worse than what Hannity has said, and I’ve agreed with Limbaugh and Beck in the past. Does that mean I need to go to prison, too? What the hell makes those of us who share these conservative ideals traitors?

(Wait, I forgot…I’m a lesbian and I’m conservative, I’m naturally a traitor!)

Meanwhile, back on the farm…

In a country where even outright threats that include detailed acts of severe violence can go entirely unnoticed, it floors me that anybody can even think that those who obey the law should be punished simply for what they think. How is it that a Muslim can openly call for Jews to be assaulted with drain cleaner, rocks on their windshields and murder and get away with it while the portion of our population that demands tolerance calls for the imprisonment of a group of people simply because they espouse views not in line with their version of “tolerance”?

You amaze me. But here’s what’s really absolutely hilarious about our idiotic poll question of the day…the first choice in the poll? It got 11%. The second? 3.4%. The third?

82.3%.

That was out of 34,141 votes. I guess the view some think is popular isn’t all it’s cracked up to be after all.

(Footnote: RTD protein shakes aren’t all that great when ingested the way nature intended. When you attempt, deliberately or not, to process them through your nasal cavity, they’re really bad.)
October 14, 2009 - Wednesday 2:32 AM
Joseph Cohen was born an Orthodox Jew. He attended rabbinical school. Then he converted to Islam. Today, he is known as Yousef al-Khattab, and he drives a pedicab (bicycle cab) in New York City. He’s also the guy who created and maintains revolutionmuslim.com.

Here was one of his most recent missives, and you’d think it would cause quite the uproar:
Ya Allah(Oh God) I beseech You to carry out your wrath on the Jewish occupiers of Palestine & their supporters.
Ya Allah(Oh God) please throw liquid drain cleaner in their faces.
Ya Allah(Oh God) burn their flammable sukkos while they sleep.
Ya Allah(Oh God),make rocks crash through their car windows as they drive in Your land Bayit al Maqdes
Ya Allah(Oh God), make their fingers and brains stick on cafe walls from impact.
Ya Allah(Oh God) answer my duaa (prayer)
Sincerely,
Yousef al-Khattab
He goes on to say this is “only a prayer” and accuses a Rabbi of inciting violence for anti-Arab genocide. Then he fails to include the Rabbi’s name, words or the date or place that the supposed words were spoken. Frankly, I’ve never heard a Rabbi call for genocide, so al-Khattab is full of it IMO.

FOX is the only news organization so far that’s putting this story out there the way it should be. I can’t even find a blurb on any of the major news organizations’ websites. I wonder…where are all the nutjobs who claim Christians are the cause of all of the anti-gay hate crimes in America right now?

You won’t find this kind of incitement on any American Christian website (no, Phelps still doesn’t count–but even HE won’t go this far) against any group. Not even Muslims are as vehemently hated by Christians as Jews are by Muslims. And this is becoming commonplace, so much so that it simply isn’t news anymore.

I daresay that it isn’t news anymore because there are plenty of anti-Semitic cowards in the halls of power at the MSM networks who would actually agree with this drivel.
Note to anti-Christian protesters: what you just read is true hate speech. If you’re not willing to call it for what it is with the same overhyped outrage, then stop pointing the finger.

Note to al-Khattab: if that is your prayer, then here’s mine:

“Father, please give strength to Your people, the Jews. Give them wisdom, guidance and peace as they defend themselves from the swine that surrounds them. And if it be in Your will that a war ensues, help them blow the Muslims all to hell. In Jesus’ name I pray…amen.”
October 11, 2009 - Sunday 5:25 AM
As I type I'm at a friends' house doing emergency babysitting duty...she got sick and one of her kids is just getting over it.  I got my flu shot, though, so no worries.

A lot has gone on lately, and I can't divulge every little thing but here's what I can talk about.  First of all, getting over a friends' suicide never gets any easier.  This was the third time a friend killed himself but this time it was my best friend.  His father still blames me because I was the last person he spoke to. For a while I was getting a lot of emails and phone calls, and right as I was getting ready to change my number it all stopped.  It may still happen, though, so if you're on my contact list do not be surprised to get a text one day to let you know that I did.

I took a break from my work with the fire department to recover and got back to it in the first weekend of September.  Then, on the 11th, as I was headed to a doctor's appointment, I started having trouble breathing and nearly the worst chest pain I have ever experienced (perfect timing, right?).  The doc sent me to the ER and while at first they thought I might have pneumothorax (a collapsed lung), it turned out to be pleurisy.  They also discovered that I have hypothyroidism and am becoming anemic.  That could explain how I'm building enough muscle to push a truck but not losing the weight I've been trying to fight off.

Just before that incident, however, I went on a date.  I started talking to a girl who seemed to be very well put together, had her head on her shoulders, and seemed to be VERY into me.  We went out and had a fantastic time.  Then, I heard nothing from her.  I sent her a couple of text messages to no avail.  About a month later I ran her email through Facebook and found her under a different name--and listed as being in a relationship with a specific person who had left convincing messages all over her page.

There's been a lot of crap that's gone on this year.  As I said, there's a lot I can't talk about.  I will say that time and a lot of thinking have brought me to the conclusion that I have trusted people who never deserved my trust.  As I mentioned in another blog, I let a person back into my life after we hadn't spoken for three years.  When we parted ways she didn't know the truth about what had gone on.  She apparently didn't understand, however, that people change; words and deeds cannot be taken back, and once you've hurt a person you can't go back to the way things were.  I tried to start over but she wanted to pick up our lives from before the big meltdown and when it didn't happen that way, she dropped me like a hot rock again.  What floors me still is that she openly said that she understood that I had been hurt by everyone around me but she wasn't willing to be a part of the solution.  In so doing she, too, proved that she had never been a real friend.

I had one coworker tell me I should ask another one out because, quote, "you never know, Mel, it could turn out to be the best thing that ever happened to you!"  It turned out to be a disaster.  I didn't even get to the point where there was any asking out, because I figured out the truth the hard way.  Seems this guy just wanted some drama.  Then when I let him know I didn't appreciate him lying to me, he turned it back around on me and said, "people will talk, honey, you need to get used to that."

I've had enough of all the shit going on in my life.  I don't understand why people can't be the loyal friends they claim to be, why they can't be straightforward, why people would lie if the truth would do them better.  I'm no angel.  I've made my mistakes.  But I've also tried damn hard to make up for the stupidity of my younger years.  I do my damndest to do right by everyone around me and somehow I still get hurt in the end.  Either I have poor taste in friends or I really am still trying too damn hard to matter to people who will never really care. 

In the meantime...I'm getting ready to get back to school.  I'm taking advanced pharmacology and EKG this semester.  If I don't get accepted to the 2011 paramedic program, I'm going to start working towards finishing my criminal justice MA.  My dad picked up the guitar again and once he's gotten comfortable with playing a few songs we'll start jamming together. 

I'm really beginning to wonder when I'm going to get to enjoy life, though.  I don't want to live to be too old.  I'd like to think there will be something to look forward to somewhere along the way.
October 10, 2009 - Saturday 2:21 AM
We hear that phrase all the time from the gay community. According to many GLBT folks, it’s the rules and laws of religion and bigots raised in said religion that make us “less than human.” Reader Alex posted a comment on an older blog that was calm but reiterated that position, and I don’t think I’ve ever addressed what he wrote, though I’ve often thought about it.

To a degree, I may be able to understand Alex’s perspective, although even coming from the culture I was raised in–the Christian subculture, always at church or church functions–I disagree with much of it now. Bringing up Fred Phelps and his clan doesn’t really get you anywhere with most Christians these days, because by linking them you’re really just insulting all the other Christians. They don’t claim Phelps, his views, or his actions. So right off the bat you’ll lose respect by pointing that finger. Trust me when I tell you not to go there.

While it used to be true that most priests and pastors would preach about gays as though we were satan himself, it’s rarely the case anymore. Continuing to justify some of our actions by claiming that isn’t winning any hearts or minds, either. I refuse to go to gay pride parades or events that include drag queen strip shows or public displays of sex toys because I have never believed that to be okay for anyone to do–regardless of sexual orientation. That kind of thing only makes us look worse to them.

Christians are NOT to blame for hate crimes. You can’t blame them for those crimes any more than you can blame gun manufacturers for gun deaths. But what about those kids who grow up hearing “hate” preached from the pulpit all their young lives?

I don’t believe that, either. Here’s why.

When I was going through my coming-out crisis, once I got past the initial shock and all the hell that went with it, I still had a lot to go through. I spent six months (at the very least) poring over scripture, trying to figure out what I believed. I was working security part-time at the Phoenix Convention Center at the time, and the Southern Baptist Convention had their annual powwow there.

An organization called Soulforce, led by Rev. Mel White, decided to do a peaceful protest during the convention. Outside the PCC, members of Soulforce held a peaceful demonstration which, on the last night, culminated in the members of Soulforce and the other organizations present forming a line and holding a candlelight vigil while the thousands attending the conference left. It happened to be the night of the big youth rally.

In a move that stunned everyone there, the teenagers coming out of the PCC went down the line of Soulforce members and hugged each and every one of them. Some of them even had their parents staring in disapproval, but they did it anyway. They came in droves to do this. There was no judgment, no hatred. They extended their love and concern to a group of people they knew were misunderstood.

You cannot prejudge a person simply because they call themselves Christians. I am a Christian still, and I am gay. I believe God made me exactly the way I am and loves me without precondition. By holding on to anger, pointing fingers, and carrying signs that say “stop the Christian Taliban,” you’re not getting anywhere. You’re only exacerbating the problem. As long as the gay community tries to alienate religious groups in this fashion, we will continue to hit a brick wall.

We’re not less than human. 95% of Christians in America have not tried (at least not in recent memory) to make us so. Let’s try taking our own advice and be tolerant. Stop pointing fingers and start talking.
October 9, 2009 - Friday 2:34 AM
I’ve already posted today, but I just got a piece of news that I cannot ignore. As a member of the Fire/Rescue/EMS community, I have a passion for fire safety and prevention. I’ve studied fire science and love the subject. I’ve seen many fires destroy homes that could have been prevented, lives upended by people who don’t educate themselves about the dangers of fire.

The US Department of Homeland Security has a grant program with a cap of $35M called the Fire Prevention & Safety Grant. The maximum grant allowed is $1M per organization. It’s a part of the Assistance to Firefighters Grant program; the aim is to help fire departments acquire equipment, training for firefighters and education for the public. In Louisiana last month, some genius at DHS awarded nearly the full amount allowed to…wait for it…WAIT FOR IT…

ACORN.

WTF?!?

I literally fell out of my chair when I read this a few minutes ago. It wasn’t news at the time because it was kept on the down-low. So was last year’s awarded grants, nearly HALF of which went to ACORN. That organization does absolutely nothing–nothing!–to further fire safety or prevention education whatsoever, and their mission statement never goes into it. So what the hell is anyone doing awarding a first-responders grant to ACORN?

Janet Napolitano, who used to be my state’s governor (don’t ask me how), refused to comment to the media. She had her spokesman say that they will respond directly to Louisiana State Senator Vitter–because “we don’t respond to correspondence through the media.” Translation: we’re not going to do anything to make ourselves look any more stupid than we already have.

Newsflash, Napolitano–you’re just about too late.

A small-town fire department in Louisiana applied for a paisley $120,000 in grant funds to buy smoke detectors for low-income families in the wake of a home fire that killed four kids. They lost that grant to ACORN. Many fire departments lost grant money to ACORN for no visible reason. A similar thing happened last year–we wasted more than $450,000 in the same grant fund on ACORN, and that was during the Bush years! Who the hell makes these decisions?

I wasn’t able to find out. There’s little to nothing on the webpage, except a suggestion to email the program’s directorate. There’s little to no information available on the decision process–who gets what. Bureaucracy in action.

It took exactly minutes from the time that the news broke on firerescue1.com for the Obama administration to suddenly sit up and notice the incredible flub. They’ve now said that ACORN will receive none of these funds.

My problem isn’t that their funding wasn’t cut soon enough. According to government sources, as soon as the sting videos were posted and Congress voted to cut their funding, DHS followed suit to revoke the grants they’d been awarded. What galls me is that a grant for first responders–money meant to help firefighters, paramedics and dispatchers make their communities safer through fire prevention and safety education–was ever awarded to ACORN at all. They’re not involved in educating the public about fire prevention. They don’t have any fire experts in their employ. So how did this happen?

It shouldn’t have. They never should have gotten a dime of that money, not last year, and sure as hell not this year. The idea that a group completely uninvolved in public safety won such a massive amount of money supposedly for that sole purpose has got me all fired up, and I’m not letting this one go.

I’ve shot an email to DHS and FEMA reps. I’ll let you know what I get in response.
October 9, 2009 - Friday 1:31 AM
Democrats are saying some amazing things right now…and they’re ensuring their pending demise with their words. Today, it’s come out that President Obama is talking about only sending enough extra troops to Afghanistan to effectively fight Al-Qaeda. Worse yet, he’s talking about making the Taliban “a partner in the political process.”

I’m sorry…since when did we recognize any difference between Al-Qaeda and the Taliban?

They may go by different names, but in ideals they are the same. They both believe that America is the great satan. They both believe that jihad needs to be carried out against America. The Taliban may be a government while Al Qaeda is a paramilitary organization, but I can’t tell where one begins and the other ends. And I cannot believe that we’re talking about actually trying to make a deal with the Taliban.

The Taliban gave Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda shelter, resources, and the ability to train for jihad. They helped 9/11 happen. While I may agree that we needed to have a better plan before taking action against Iraq, we should have taken out the Taliban before they got a foothold back in the 80’s. There was no excuse for allowing them to take power. We have pictures and video of human rights violations that make my blood run cold, and our President wants to make a deal?

I don’t suppose this has anything to do with his Muslim upbringing. Or his desire to find some way to apologize to the world.

I hear liberals all day telling me how even the war in Afghanistan is wrong and needs to end. It’s their culture, they say. It’s not up to us to tell other people how to live.

This is where Philip goes, “Oh, REALLY?”

If it’s not our job to tell anyone how to live, then what’s the point of hate crimes legislation (which, by the way, you’ll get your wish for today when Congress votes to add sexual orientation to the list)? If we don’t have any right to tell anybody else what’s right and wrong, then why do we as a society have any laws to begin with? If it’s not up to us to determine what constitutes a punishable human rights violation, then what the hell gives you the right to call waterboarding torture? And please, explain to me WHY you’re demanding a global response to the genocide in Darfur. Explain this to me. Tell me why Israel is so wrong for doing what they do and defending themselves, why you’re so ready to support Palestinian suicide bombers.

If it is not our business what another nation does because that’s their culture, then why do you point fingers at us here at gayconservative and say that we must be a group of self-loathing closet cases and liken us to Jews trying to be Nazis?

You can’t have it both ways. Either there’s a clear right and wrong and we’re willing to stand up for it or everything is gray and there should be no societal law.

Oh, and I have to point this one out, too–GOP members issued a statement about the kerfuffle over the proposed troop surge in Afghanistan, saying, “If Nancy Pelosi’s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place.”

Pelosi, on cue, made it a women’s rights issue and was completely aghast that Republicans would dare make such a statement. She just couldn’t believe that they’d say that to the first woman speaker of the house, and she hasn’t heard that language in decades.

Get a clue, Pelosi. We don’t give a damn what’s in your jockeys. What we care about is the fact that you have zero military experience and no concern whatsoever for what’s best for our nation and the future. That comment had nothing at all to do with your gender, so please, quit trying to make this a civil rights game. You’re proving that you’re incapable of using your brain to respond intelligently. You’re only playing politics, the same partisan game you accuse Republicans of.

One more thing…if any Republican had done what Charlie Rangel has, you’d be calling for his head. You’ve done it for far lesser offenses. Once we take the reins, you can bet your gender- and race-baiting ass he’ll answer for what he’s done.
October 6, 2009 - Tuesday 3:00 AM
I’ve been thinking of how to blog about this for the past week. NBC’s new primetime drama, “Trauma,” debuted last week. In the hopes that I would finally see an accurate portrayal of my profession on a major network, I watched it. I was not merely disappointed.

I was absolutely outraged.

The opening scenes were some of the worst I’ve ever seen. The female lead, a gorgeous blonde woman, isn’t wearing anything remotely resembling a uniform. She was wearing hot pants, a shirt tailored more for a stripper than a paramedic, and had the shirt unbuttoned far enough to show more cleavage than Pamela Anderson in her Baywatch days. Of course, every male character in the scene–which is every other character on the screen–is staring at her with their mouths hanging open. The very next scene shows this female lead having sex with her medic partner…in the back of their ambulance.

Lemme tell you folks something: anybody found wearing what this character was wearing while on duty would be fired on the spot. And sex in the back of a rescue? Please! I would not even want to eat my grub in the back of my rig! Completely aside from that, though, it’s unethical, leaves body substances in an area that is supposed to be kept sparkling clean for the safety of patients, and it’s so easy to be discovered with windows all over the stupid thing. Nothing says “please revoke my certification” like having sex in the back of your ambulance.

The medics get called to a rooftop rescue next, where the helicopter shows up and the pilot makes jokes to them over his intercom. Again, that doesn’t happen, especially not in a big city during a major rescue effort on the roof of a highrise. Predictably, the chopper collides with another chopper (both of them were flying WAY too close to the building) and crash with the medic crews still on the rooftop.

The pilot who survived, apparently the only survivor, comes back a year later to the job, hot-dogging and displaying behavior that would instantly have grounded him again. Nobody behaving the way this guy was would have been cleared to return to work. Our blonde female lead is still wearing the hot pants and stripper shirt, and every time she bends over a patient her mammaries all but fall out.

Then comes the finale: the big crash. A driver trying to text and speed causes a massive wreck that ends up involving a tanker truck carrying gasoline. Who’s the first there? The medics. What do they do? Not what they’re supposed to do according to the guidelines of the National Registry of EMT’s.

Every EMT is taught the two most important things in our profession on the first day of school–BSI and scene safety. BSI is body substance isolation (gloves, mask, goggles, that sort of thing). Scene safety is paramount to us. If we get hurt, we can’t help anybody else. We just become more victims that need to be rescued and the incident becomes an even bigger mess.

Not one of those medics would have been allowed on the scene until the firefighters on the hazmat crew had taken care of the ruptured tanker spilling gasoline everywhere. And that pilot? He wouldn’t have landed anywhere near that scene. He sure as hell wouldn’t have been marching around burning vehicles without a care in the world.
Also, once a victim has been pronounced deceased, the medics don’t transport the body to a hospital. It stays right where it is until the medical examiner comes to investigate–and the ME takes the body for possible autopsy.

Some people say, “it’s just TV.” Do we ever expect TV or the movies to be realistic? Not completely. This show, however, is an insult to every Fire and EMS professional who worked hard at their education to become public safety officials. I and those I know realize that it’s unrealistic, but a large portion of the public at large doesn’t. Just because a teenage boy would be more likely to watch a show with a hot blonde dressed like a floozy doesn’t mean you should create that role for a show about paramedics. It’s an embarrassment.

Truth, decency, and professional ethics are the main casualties of “Trauma.”
October 4, 2009 - Sunday 1:33 AM
I found myself saying something just a couple of hours ago that I didn't expect to hear from my own mouth:

I'm afraid I'm going to be alone for the rest of my life because I have never in my life fit in anywhere and I don't believe at this point that I ever will.  And I don't see the point in trying to take care of myself if that's never going to change.

Everybody talks about being different.  When I was in high school, "being different" was all the rage.  It was cool.  It was the only way to be.  You had to find some way to be different, otherwise you didn't fit in.  I always thought that was a bit hypocritical; talking about being different, being a rebel, in order to gain acceptance defeated the purpose.  To me it was putting on an act just like every other group so you could fit in.

I was the kid who never fit in anywhere.  Not at school, not at church, not even at home.  I grew up and tried to pretend that I didn't give a damn--I got tattoos and piercings, played in several rock bands, and tried to convince everybody that their opinion didn't matter.  Truth was, it always did.  Today someone brought up a very good point linking that past with my present.

I always wanted to fit in, but when I was a kid the people I tried to fit in with were the popular ones.  I always wanted to be in the in-crowd.  That hasn't changed today.  I don't fit in with that crowd any more now than I did then, no matter how hard I've tried.  I have questioned my sanity for continuing to try to matter to people who don't give a damn, and as much as I remind myself that it's my mind and my life, I keep wishing it would change. 

I used to believe that God always had a reason for bringing certain people into your life.  I'm not sure I believe that anymore.  One person who hurt me deeply several years ago came back into my life last year, and I thought there was a reason for it.  She only ended up hurting me all over again.  I can't see any reason at all for our paths crossing.  There are actually very few people I've had "friendships" with that I really believe were in my life for any real reason now. 

I don't belong at either of my jobs, really.  I don't belong at home.  I don't belong in conservative circles because I'm gay, and I don't belong in the gay community because I refuse to toe the party line.  I really am different, and I'm not sure I like it.  I often wonder if it's everyone else or if it's just me.  But at the same time, while I wish more than anything that I belonged somewhere, there's a piece of me now that has been hurt so many times that I'm afraid of actually making that connection with another person.

Maybe I'll always be that walking contradiction in terms.  Maybe it's worth fighting.  Maybe it's not.  Being truly different isn't all it was cracked up to be to that rebellious group in high school.  At least they were happy in their fantasy.