Statut : Célibataire
Ville : Nashville
Pays: US
Date d’inscription :: 10/02/2005
|
|
|
|
vendredi, décembre 18, 2009
 |
Dear All,
I've gotten quite a few emails and letters asking how judges are
making decisions on which groups are voted off Sing Off. Most agree
though I got a few suggestions to put down various crack pipes.
What I'm listening for is to be moved or entertained. If that
doesn't happen my experience has to kick in and I must analyze in a way
I can quickly relay my thoughts to the bands (I like to call em
bands...) Each subsequent performance should show improvement at a rate
that makes me comfortable giving the band a record deal next week.
Solving one problem and creating another can happen too. I feel I need
to project into the future a bit to see if the band is heading the
right way and doing it quickly enough. Can this group make good,
interesting records song after song?
FACE
A very talented group of singers from Boulder Colorado. They had loads
of things in their favor. Good voices, relatively good pitch and
blend... fatally for them they chose a song by Bon Jovi that they had
to move down a few keys and that really made the "dude next door" image
a liability. They were the group that could have related to the common
man but they shouldn't have sounded common. I'm sure with the right
song choice they could have survived that show, but the judgement call
indicated there was a long way to go until they were making records.
Their swan song showed they might just get there one day.
SOLO
Full of soul, vibe and heart but were just too far behind in terms of
the basics of arranging. A few of them could well make good recordings
as solo artists, a point that Shawn made well. But its the way they
work together. Any a cappella act is going to go sharp and flat but the
trick is that they listen and do it together. If the audience don't
know, who really cares? But if they don't know we're in trouble. I hope
that they get some other opportunities as a result of the show, at
least individually.
NOTEWORTHY
That was a tough call. The mormon girls were good sports about my input
and my urging them to cuss. haha. These kids sang as in tune as anyone.
They weren't voted off the show because they weren't good or because
they were an all female group as they seemed to imply (Maxx Factor are
all female and there are only four of them). They were solving problems
and creating others in my opinion. They had star quality but it wasn't
there when I closed my eyes and listened. They fall completely inside a
type of a cappella group that you see on campuses and I hate to say
they're a dime a dozen but they haven't found their unique voice.
Having all female voices creates a challenge, but then again so does
having all men frankly. And with a female group you sort of know going
into it what those challenges will be. They tried to address the
challenge I think but they didn't help their sound in the process. If
you're still scratching your head then please imagine Sinead 'O Connor
on the stage alone singing in a whisper. That would blow us away (and
has) and its a cappella. Sometimes subtraction is key, dynamics and
knowing your strengths. I didn't see these girls landing that plane
this series although I wouldlove nothing more than for them to have
great success and show us all. One TV show, one judge... just a long in
the line of opinions they'll endure as we all do in our careers.
They're very good and I believe we haven't heard the last of them.
MAXX FACTOR
I did hate to cut this group because they were filling a very special
niche and were the most radical group in the running. Only four of
them. They were basically running a race in a go cart and working out
ways to stay in. They artfully implied that there was more music going
on than there actually was - that's artful in any kind of arrangement, a cappella or
otherwise . They were very relaxed about the spaces they left and that
was attractive musically. As much as I loved their voices, they didn't
have a home run lead singer even though Leslie definitely has her own
style and can hold her own. Sonically live they were very powerful, the
only group that I often heard straight off stage vocally over the
actual in house sound system. They tuned like a brass section, not like
they'd learned from auto tune or recording separately to keyboard
tracks (and muting). Unfortunately the go cart ran out of gas. They
were up against equally talented groups who pulled ahead because they
had the resources in terms of numbers and serious singers. So good luck
Maxx Factor - your swan song was class and we expected nothing less!
SOCALS
Ouch it hurt to cut this group too. I really personally related to them
as personalities and musicians but I still didn't have a solid picture
of their collective musical identity and that's key to making records.
They came together over the course of the series in ways none of the
judges expected. I was hoping for a slay on their last song Hazy Shade
of Winter, which is what it would have taken for them to have put any
of the remaining groups out of business. But I felt the awkward
interpretation of that song didn't help the case that the group had a
'voice'. The three remaining groups now all have solid thumbprints. I
feel the SOCALS are moments away from completely knowing who they are
but they're still swerving - I'd have liked for them to have had that
defining moment happen during this show, but hell, if its next year
then right on!
Maybe this will clarify where we're coming from, what we're
listening to. And of course I'm always open to what you're hearing out
there so twitter (@benjaminfolds) and let me know. One of the great
things about a cappella is how powerful it is in person. It touches a
nerve and moves people in a way that probably goes back to the dawn of
man/(woman!). Any one of these groups would blow you away off mic in
person. Its hard not to love it all when you're in the middle of it and
very hard to distinguish pitch because really we're not meant to care
about that stuff so much. But on TV its under the microscope and it has
to live up to the high standard of perfectly tuned musical instruments.
I've been learning a lot listening to the playback and the production
people continue to improve on the sound. But is a genre in process, not
just a TV show in process.
Sincerely,
B. Folds
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mercredi, décembre 16, 2009
 |
Hi all,
Thanks for the overflowing mailbox of kind notes about the Sing Off show. It shows that a cappella is growing and my interest is in not just growing the audience but pushing the genre and the art form.
A few of us had a twitter conversation (@benjaminfolds) last night after the TV show which threatened to be too much information for that format and probably clogged everyone's twitter boxes so I thought I'd put up a quick piece for tonight.
A cappella is as old as ye hills. Its just singing and I can't think of anything more musically natural and basic. Its emergence as a potentially competitive genre in the mainstream reflects another concept which is as old as ye hills, which is that when people hit harder times they get together and sing. Putting aside some of the cheesier conventions of the current form with its Broadway leanings (which if inspected aren't any cheesier than some other forms of pop music currently sanctioned by THE MAN), a cappella music is poised to become the next in a half century of multiple and diminishing aftershocks post-eruption of rock music in the 1950's. Remember that when rock music began, many of the hits were covers of earlier hits, often recycled within weeks. Now this music style is moving fast, both artistically and commercially and I perceive potential to steer a very skillful art form in some small way via a television show such as Sing Off. This is why I am here. It doesn't need to take over the world, it just deserves its spot and some respect.
I have nothing against pop music or what's going on currently. There's brilliance out there and amazing talent. But what I do question is a world where a super celebrity who's propped up by a massive machine, pitch corrected gratuitously, photo shopped, marketed, backed by computer tracks is accepted as cool in the mainstream while if you google "a cappella" you'll likely find associated searches such as 'cheesy', 'vomit', 'nerd' etc. No music form is superior to the other but I would point out that what you're seeing on Sing Off is pure integrity musically speaking and extremely difficult to pull off. Yes the vehicle is a TV format and great, maybe it will help reach more people. If it involved a smackdown or makeover to get people to watch and listen, fine. These groups perform on this show with no instrumental backing and no safety net. Anything out of tune puts the modern ear off so there is no tolerance. They have to have a fairly thorough understanding of western theory, harmony, arranging, voice leading and so on, just to get through a few measure. We pro's are rarely put through those kinds of paces, at least those of us in rock music, including the ones with the 'street cred'.
The term "street credibility" is not something that we need to banter about about with a cappella. Its irrelevant. "Cred" (latin root credo) is fickle and can be manipulated, and those most concerned with it are marketing people and ex indie rockers going through mid life crisis. I'd prefer to concentrate on the concept of integrity. A cappella is all about musical integrity if nothing else and it will keep us honest.
What I'm hoping out of the show is to give a cappella some more momentum, so that groups are motivated to step it up. The conventions are fine but there's so much more. This is music that could find itself on the radio and developing very quickly. As I've said, if the economy takes a total dump and none of us can afford instruments, then a cappella will be king. There's a long way to go. It needs to be respected and developed. There need to be original songs coming from these groups and that's a ways away. Whether its the Medici family, Alan Freid, or NBC, Sony, Oprah... somebody has to put some money behind it and there needs to be a vehicle and I'm proud and happy to put down what I'm doing to move it forward. For those most cynical bastards (category includes me) I'm earning the same for three weeks of work on this show that I would from playing two gigs. And I personally invested in the University A Cappella record in time and money and will not take a cent for it - my proceeds going to music education. I do fine anyway and I just enjoy this stuff - if it leads to other stuff then I'll be happy and if not, I'll be happy. (not saving the world, just having a good time)
I'll put up thoughts on the whole thing on this Facebook page all week as the show goes on. I believe the show is improving by the episode although there will only be four this run. I'm getting a bit more comfortable with my role as a judge though I'd like to have another week of shorter episodes to completely get my sea legs. I was worried that I was nerding out musically a bit too much while TV probably wanted a totally different approach but we got overwhelming response to the musical approach which is heartening. There seems to be a lot of people purely interested in music,not celebrity and not fads - disenfranchised music lovers (and some musical theater people?). Thank you for that. I'll try and get my act together quickly over this short series to help it along. I'll see if I can get our University A Cappella site updated so that people can get together on it, maybe get the Youtube channel updated. There's a lot going on. Like any form of music, some of it blows and some of it's brilliant. The difference is that these a cappella people can still make their own rules in this window. We rock and pop people have been working in an already mined art form, finding nuggets where we can for decades. This is fresh. All of its music and I'm proud to go now and put on some kind of acceptable TV clothing, go to makeup and put up with some promotion because I get to hear kick ass singers doing it because they love it. Goodnight.
Sincerely, B. Folds
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
jeudi, avril 23, 2009
 |

Ben Folds Presents: University A Cappella will be in stores 4/28. Click HERE to listen to the entire album on Ben's iLike page! Ben Folds on iLike - Add iLike to your MySpace 
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mercredi, février 18, 2009
 |
Hello All.
We've just wrapped up a new record called "University A Cappella" and I'm back on tour.
I'm hoping for an April release. Its mixed and mastered and art will be turned in in a few days.
For those who don't know what I'm talking about, I've put together a record of university a cappella groups performing my songs.
Our method of recording and the production concept was inspired by National Geographic field recordings and old seventies Nonesuch Records field recordings of native music of different cultures. Simple live recordings, documents of music being made in real time that capture the inimitable thumbprint of a culture as it is in motion. I love that shit.
So it was in that spirit that we recorded student a cappella groups live in their natural habitat with a minimal of mics and no overdubs. It was me, Fleur, Joe Costa on planes trains and automobiles lugging cases of recording equipment into lecture halls, rehearsal rooms, dorms and even a campus synagogue. We didn't get to nearly as many as I would have liked - I just kept telling myself I can always do this again and make a series out of it.
As I now know these groups do record quite often and release CDs. However their style of recording generally more resembles that of modern pop music where each track is recorded separately, isolated and tuned. This is totally fine and produces a very other worldly effect. These kinds of highly produced a cappella recordings often fool your ear into thinking that there are real drums and basses. Its pretty amazing but not at all what I wanted to capture.
What I did want to capture was the moment and the feeling of being IN the group. If there are so many of these popping up (hundreds!) then there must be a reason to be in them. I wanted to find and capture that without killing it.
As I listened through the more than two hundred submissions I found a few examples of existing a cappella recordings that I felt represented the state of the art of the highly produced a cappella style recording method I've mentioned. And although this kind of slick production was possibly the antithesis of my original idea, I felt they should be included just based on excellence. One is a version of Darren Jessee's "Magic" by University of Chicago Voices in Your Head. Always opting for black and white photography analogies over baseball ones, I would say this recording is the Jerry Uelsmann of all vocal recording. It puts the listener in a place that's obviously not the real world but still a hell of a cool place to live for three and a half minutes.
The recorded of "Selfless Cold and Composed" was self recorded and submitted by the Sacramento State Jazz Singers and while they put each singer on separate tracks, and while it sounds quite perfect, its also quite live and very untampered with. We mixed their original tracks to make sure they sat in with the other performances on the album but the production is very much theirs. The reharharmonization in this arrangement is insane! I seriously doubt we could have improved on them to have come limping in with our equipment for re-recording.
Two others were phoned in for us because I couldn't travel to them and they followed our guidelines for recording perfectly and sang their asses off too. University of Colorado at Boulder Buffoons recorded Landed and bravely left the warts and all as I'd asked. No overdubs or computer tuning. Just live singing. Thank you. We picked a few takes, edited and mixed.
FIfth Element from Wisconsin, the smallest group in the lineup also recorded on their own and sent it in. They sent an already edited performance but its very live and I felt captured what they did naturally.
All the groups were a total joy to work with. They were total pros. Through the repetition that is often necessary when recording old school, the lead singers stayed completely on top of things, pitch and performance while the harmonies got tighter and more energetic. Some got it on the first take. Some gave us a ride back to the airport. Some had beers after the recording with Joe Costa. Some groups were girls and some groups were boys and some were mixtures of all three. I'm starting to feel like Dr Suess. One group is from a university who's lawyers called us up and told us we weren't allowed to mention any association with their university. Funny, because I attended that school and was proud to work with these guys and try and pass on a little of my post college professional experience. Ironically I felt like I learned more from watching these kids work than I ever did during my stint there as a student.
One group is from Newton High School in Mass. They were total pro's. I felt they had a take fairly early but they insisted on getting it better and I'm glad they did. They were so good I never felt as though I needed to take it easier on them. We were making an album together.
Some of the singers in these groups are music majors. Most are not. One fellow had recently graduated and was teaching high school science in the next town and I insisted they call the guy up and bring him in. He sounds like Art Garfunkle. Some of the singers in these groups will sign deals and make records but most will not. That goes to show that music doesn't require a license or radio promotion. Power to the fucking people!
Well... two of the tracks required a major label artist with a fancy studio and those tracks are my stab at a cappella. My label were very kind to be involved in this but they did insist that I contribute two tracks in order that they could justify the release. I thought, no problem. Big problem. If i wasn't in awe of these singing groups before, now that I've spent tens of hours arranging and recording two songs, I am now. Boxing was scored as a kind of four part jazz invention and was very time consuming. The voices are mostly mine and Jared Reynolds'. Basses were sung by the famous Webb Wilder, local vocal coach John Ray and our own Joe Costa. Effington filled what I perceived as a serious gap in the new wave a cappella arena. While Boxing is a pure and organic arrangement, Effington uses the studio in the way that some of the modern a cappella groups do.
Some groups were recorded and the recordings were not used. There were just too many tracks on the album as it was. That happens to the best. Not all recordings come out like you want them to. These tracks will be featured on our websites because they should be heard.
I honestly can't wait for this to come out. There's nothing like it.
Ben
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mercredi, février 18, 2009
 |
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02132009/watch.html
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mercredi, février 18, 2009
 |
link: http://lnmc.crooksandliars.com/maxmarginal/late-nite-music-club-welcomes-ben-fold
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
lundi, décembre 15, 2008
 |
"Way To Normal: Stems and Seeds"
We're giving away a new 2 disk set to all current members of my fan club, The People's Front Of Judea and to anyone who joins the fan club before Feb 15th.
As you may have noticed, records have been getting louder and more compressed over the last ten years or so. Many like a loud record, many do not. The official version of "Way To Normal" is very loud and this was the intention. Loud records sound good on car stereos, iPods and on the radio. Quieter records are more dynamic and while they don't compete so well on a mix tape, they often sound better on good audio equipment.
Many of my fans are audiophiles and there have been requests for an alternate less compressed version of Way To Normal to be made available. Although I stand behind the official version of this album and have the utmost respect for the producer and engineers involved, I'm a populist at heart and saw no reason not to provide a slightly different approach for those who prefer more old fashioned dynamics along with a sequence that builds.
And so we have "Way To Normal: Stems and Seeds" - two disks. One disk is a remix, remaster, re-sequence of "Way To Normal" along with the now legendary (in our own minds) 'fake' tracks, the Japanese version of "Hiroshima", the Conan Rehearsal of "You Don't Know Me" and the Piano Orchestra version of "Cologne" - a total of 20 tracks.
The other is a disk of files, called stems, which will pop up in Garageband and allow you to mix the album yourselves. Just click on the file of the song you want to mix and you'll quickly understand how it works. If you'd like to turn the drums off or down, or if you want to use loops or turn that damn singer off and sing it yourself, its all possible. We've included extra loops with the song "You Don't Know Me" hoping someone could maybe come along and make a hit out of this fucking song.
Yours, Ben Folds
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
samedi, novembre 29, 2008
 |
Hello All,
I've listened through over 200 a cappella acts and have it narrowed down to 18.
I'll have to narrow it down more. But that's where it stands as of now. We'll know more once everything is recorded. And I'll be doing some traveling with my engineer, Joe and some old ribbon mics to record as many as I have time for in the first couple of weeks of December.
Here are the groups to be recorded. Some have already finished recordings. This list is in no particular order:
1. Blue Notes (Wellesley College) - Annie Waits 2. Midnight Ramblers (University of Rochester) - Army 3. Leading Tones (Ohio University) - Brick 4. Lady Bens - Cigarette 5. Newtones (Newton High School in Boston) - Evaporated 6. Fifth Element (University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire) - Fair 7. Gracenotes (West Chester University of PA) - Fred Jones Part 2 8. Loreleis (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) - Jesusland 9. Colorado University Buffoons - Landed 10. Voices In Your Head (University of Chicago) - Magic 11. Spartones (University of North Carolina at Greensboro) - Not The Same 12. Jazz Singers (Sacramento State) - Selfless, Cold and Composed 13. Mosaic Whispers (Washington University - St Louis) - Still FIghting It 14. The Amateurs (Washington University - St Louis) - Luckiest 15. Nassoons (Princeton) - Time 16. With Someone Else's Money (University of Georgia) - You Don't Know Me 17. All Night Yahtzee (Florida State) - Missing The War 18. Treble in Paradise (American University) - Zak and Sara
If you're on the list and we haven't contacted you, we will. If some of these don't make the record its not because the groups sucked. Its the hit and miss nature of making records and that the record can only be so long. There was a good reason for each of these that was chosen. There were too many more amazing ones to mention and I'll see if I can find the time to contact some of them by mail to thank them for taking the time.
We're trying to get this done for a spring release.
Ben
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
samedi, novembre 29, 2008
 |
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/11/23/massachusetts.piano/index.html?eref=rss_latest
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mardi, novembre 04, 2008
 |
How McCain Could Win Monday 03 November 2008 by: Greg Palast, t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Two Obama canvassers prepare their pitch before knocking on registered Republicans' doors in Arvada, Colorado. (Photo: Kevin Moloney / The New York Times) It's November 5 and the nation is in shock. Media blame it on the "Bradley effect": Americans supposedly turned into Klansmen inside the voting booth, and Barack Obama turned up with 6 million votes less than calculated from the exit polls. Florida came in for McCain and so did Indiana. Colorado, despite the Democrats' Rocky Mountain high after the Denver convention, stayed surprisingly Red. New Mexico, a state where Anglos are a minority, went McCain by 300 votes, as did Virginia.
That's the nightmare. Here's the cold reality.
Swing state Colorado. Before this election, two Republican secretaries of state purged 19.4 percent of the entire voter roll. One in five voters. Pfft!
Swing state New Mexico. One in nine voters in this year's Democratic caucus found their names missing from the state-provided voter registries. And not just any voters. County by county, the number of voters disappeared was in direct proportion to the nonwhite population. Gore won the state by 366 votes; Kerry lost it by only 5,900. Despite reassurances that all has been fixed for Tuesday, Democrats lost from the list in February told me they're still "disappeared" from the lists this week.
Swing state Indiana. In this year's primary, ten nuns were turned away from the polls because of the state's new voter ID law. They had drivers' licenses, but being in their 80s and 90s, they'd let their licenses expire. Cute. But what isn't cute is this: 566,000 registered voters in that state don't have the ID required to vote. Most are racial minorities, the very elderly and first-time voters; that is, Obama voters. Twenty-three other states have new, vote-snatching ID requirements.
Swing state Florida. Despite a lawsuit battle waged by the Brennan Center for Justice, the state's Republican apparatchiks are attempting to block the votes of 85,000 new registrants, forcing them to pass through a new "verification" process. Funny thing: verification applies only to those who signed up in voter drives (mostly black), but not to voters registering at motor vehicle offices (mostly white).
And so on through swing states controlled by Republican secretaries of state.
The Ugly Secret
Here's an ugly little secret about American democracy: We don't count all the votes. In 2004, based on the data from the US Elections Assistance Commission, 3,006,080 votes were not counted: "spoiled," unreadable and blank ballots; "provisional" ballots rejected; mail-in ballots disqualified.
This Tuesday, it will be worse. Much worse.
That's what I found while traveling the nation over the last year for BBC Television and Rolling Stone Magazine, working with voting rights attorney Robert F. Kennedy Jr. This we guarantee: there will be far more votes disappeared by Tuesday night than the three million lost in 2004. A six-million vote swipe, quite likely, shifts 4 percent of the ballots, within the margin of error of the tightest polls.
Begin with this harsh statistic: since the last election, more than ten million voters have been purged from the nation's vote registries. And that's just the start of the steal.
If the noncount were random, it wouldn't matter. But it's not random. A US Civil Rights Commission analysis shows that the chance a black voter's ballot will "spoil" or be blank is 900 percent higher than a white voter's.
Does that mean the election's stolen and you should forget voting and just go back to bed for four years? Hell, no. It means you vote and vote smart, learn how to pry their filthy little hands off your ballot (there's a link at the end).
How to Steal an Election in Five Easy Steps
Here's how they can pull off the steal. Take out your calculator and add it up.
Step One: The "Dumpster" Vote - Purge Voters, Provisional Ballots
Ten million voters purged? What the hell is going on here? Why are we removing millions from the voter rolls?
The answer is the GOP's secret weapon, the Help America Vote Act, signed by George Bush in 2002. When Bush tells us he's going to help us vote, look out. But Democrats didn't. They signed on to the GOP bill, believing this "reform" law would prevent "another Florida." Instead, "Help America Vote" Floridated the entire nation.
Here's how: Help America Vote empowered secretaries of state to remove fraudulent and suspicious voters from the voter registries. It was the trick used by Katherine Harris in Florida in 2000 when she purged "felon" voters. Except they weren't felons. And now her GOP confrères are doing it in dozens of states, calling folks felon voters, "inactive" voters, suspect voters, whatever.
Take Colorado. The GOP didn't exactly trumpet it's erasing 19.4 percent of voters' names. It was, as detectives say, "hidden in plain sight," buried deep inside a US Elections Assistance Commission administrative report, among tables of mind-numbing stats through which I was trawling some months ago. (I used to teach statistics at Indiana University, so I enjoy reading matrices like others enjoy novels.)
For BBC TV and Rolling Stone, I asked the current Colorado Secretary of State Mike Coffman, "Why all the purging?" No answer, not a word, stonewalled even when I flew into Denver and stood outside his door. He was, I guess, too busy preparing to count his own votes as Republican candidate for Congress.
So, where are the Democrats? That's the really scary part. I spoke with Paul Hultin, appointed by Colorado's Democratic governor to the state's Election Reform Commission. Hultin's a terrific attorney. He knows, and says, that Help America Vote was a law "born in corruption," but he's spent his time on Colorado's voting machines, which he knows are busted. He's the Democrats' expert, and he didn't know that a fifth of his state's voters had vanished from the voter rolls.
Well, don't worry. Hultin's official committee will be holding hearings on the voting debacle in Colorado ... on November 19.
Then there's New Mexico, with those one in nine Democrats missing. I spoke with San Miguel County elections supervisor, Democrat Pecos Paul Maez, who was none too happy that 20 percent of his voters, the majority poor and Hispanic, were not on the voter rolls, especially because he was one of the missing. He blamed the state for using a suspect contractor to tag names for the Big Purge, as required by the Help America Vote Act. The contractor that conducted the New Mexico purge, Electronic Systems and Software (ES&S), was founded by Republican Senator Chuck Hagel.
The company and state choose the purging "algorithms," those mathematical formulae that, depending on how you tweak them, can go through a voter roll like a hot knife through cream cheese.
So, what happens to the purged voters? They're told to scram when they arrive to vote or, if they squawk, they get a "provisional" ballot on which they can pretend to vote.
Now, here are the facts about provisionals: they don't get counted. And there are lots of them. The great unreported story of the 2004 election was that there were more than three million voters shunted to provisional ballots. Over a million (1,090,000) were never counted, just chucked in the dumpster. That's what caused Kerry to lose New Mexico, Iowa and Ohio. This time, because of Help America Vote and a Republican campaign to challenge voters, the number of provisionals will rise, as will rejections.
Whatever keeps you from getting a real ballot - purged name, for example - keeps you from having the provisional counted as well. That's because Democrats won the right of every voter to get a provisional ballot, but not the right to have that ballot counted. And how many will go uncounted? Double the 1.1 million loss in 2004 - not just because of the GOP's purge-mania, but because of a vicious little codicil in Help America Vote that went into effect since the last election ...
Step Two: "Verification" (and Elimination) of New Voters
For the first time in US history, new voters will face special new obstacles to voting. When we say "new" voters, let's be clear - we mean Obama voters. A Wall Street Journal poll shows new voters prefer Obama by an eye-popping three to one (69 percent to 20 percent).
So, the Republican game plan is simple: don't let new voters vote. There are three steps to this block-and-steal tactic. First, under the new law, states can deny new voters registration on the grounds their names can't be verified against government data files. Sounds reasonable, but it's not, because we don't have Soviet-style citizenship files in the US. The Social Security Administration is rejecting nearly half of the names submitted because there is no multi-state compatible tracking system. Of course, the Republicans know that.
New voter verification losses are huge. In California, a Republican secretary of state rejected 42 percent of new registrations, a trick discovered by his Democratic successor, Debra Bowen. She told me most of the rejected vote applicants had Hispanic, Vietnamese, Islamic and other "odd" names - odd, that is, for Republicans.
It used to be that you filled out a registration card and, bingo, you were registered. Not any more. That's also what happened in Florida to the 85,000 new registrants. They were victims of strict "matching" algorithms. Other states are also playing the "match" game. The result is voters will find themselves simply missing (or in some states, required to show extra ID - another horror show we'll discuss below). But don't worry, a of couple million new voters will get provisional ballots. That way, they can practice filling out their ballots for the day when democracy returns to America.
Step Three: New ID Laws
Karl Rove said, "I go to the grocery store and I wanna cash a check to pay for my groceries I gotta show a little bit of ID. Why should it not be reasonable ... at the voting place they ought to be able to prove who they are by showing some form of ID." And so, while buying his Pampers, Rove came up with a game-winner for the GOP.
Karl, let me answer your question. The reason, according to several studies by the Bush administration itself, is that lots of folks don't have government ID. Some are nuns, some are poor, lots are brown or old. I was on Fox TV with Lady Rothschild a couple of weeks ago. The lady, a McCain supporter, approved of the ID requirement - and was truly surprised to find out that some poorer Americans don't have passports. "Why don't they?" her Fox-mates asked, incredulous. Well, not every barrio kid has just returned from his estate outside London.
Rove knows that. He certainly knows that, for example, Professor Matthew Barreto of the University of Washington found that 10 percent of white voters in Indiana don't have the needed ID. And, for blacks, it's about double - 19 percent lack the ID required to vote. New ID laws will add to the turn-aways, provisionals and rejecteds on Tuesday by at least two million - and that's way conservative, assuming the new laws in swing states are only one-fourth as restrictive as Indiana's.
Step Four: Spoiling Ballots
Your chad gets hung. The touch screen doesn't like your touch. Or, your paper ballot had that extra mark that made the machine spit out your ballot like day-old beer with a cigarette floating in it.
In the last election, 1,389,231 ballots were zeroed-out, "spoiled," because the machines lost them, couldn't read them, mangled them or simply didn't register them. But it's not random, not by a long shot. In New Mexico in 2004, I found that 89 percent of blank and spoiled ballots were cast in minority precincts - a sum of uncounted ballots way over the Republican "victory" margin in that state.
Another study shows that Hispanics' vote choices are six times as likely to fail to be recorded when they vote on computers versus paper ballots.
In the primaries and in 2006, the "spoilage" and blank ("undervote") totals were horrific. There is every reason to believe the "spoilage" total will be as high as in the 2004 election. That is, no less than one million votes, overwhelmingly in minority districts, will just vanish. ("Spoilage" is not the same as vote tampering. There is the concern that "black-box" computers will switch your vote via an evil software hack job. That's another matter completely - and more votes lost if it happens, a sum I'm not including here.)
Step Five: Rejecting Mail-In Ballots
You've mailed in your ballot. Last time around, over half a million mail-in ballots were junked: everything from postage due to not liking your signature to a circle checked, not filled in. Mailing in a ballot is playing Russian roulette with it. About a tenth get junked.
This time, the GOP has a new game for trashing your absentee vote. In states like Florida, some FTFs (First-Time Federal voters) will have to include a photocopy of their ID in with the absentee ballot. Bet you didn't know that. They're counting on you not knowing that. In Florida, for example, you have to place the ID photocopy outside the inner envelope, but inside the outer envelope - Got that? - or your vote is toast. I've spoken to one student voter, who lost his vote for failing to use the two envelopes - though he only received one. (Have a mail-in ballot in hand? Then, for God's sake, walk it in to the polling place or local board of elections. Sign, seal and deliver it in person.)
You may get it right, but historic data suggest that, when combining the FTF games with the usual mail-in cock-ups, Obama will lose another million votes to mail-in disqualifications.
Exit Polls and Exit Stratagems
These millions of uncounted ballots - spoiled ballots, provisional ballots rejected, absentee ballots disqualified - fully explain the difference between exit polls (which, for example, gave Kerry Ohio in 2004 and Gore a win in Florida in 2000) and the official count. Exit pollsters ask, "Who did you vote for?" They never ask, and can't know, "Did your vote count?"
How would they get away with it? Well, they begin explaining away how the "pollsters" get it wrong, how pollsters didn't figure the "Bradley Effect" of lying, racist voters. They'll tell us the new, young and Black Obamaniacs gave money, went to rallies - but never bothered to vote. But the real reason will never be whispered: They cast votes that just weren't counted.
Will the election be stolen on Tuesday? No, it's already been stolen. That is, several million voters are doomed to lose their ballots; most won't even know it. Overwhelmingly, they are the poor, minorities, new voters - Obama voters. Does that mean McCain's got it in the bag and you're helpless? Not at all.
Don't Steal Your Own Vote
In 2004, I and other investigators wrote, long before Election Day, "Ohio's stolen." We were deadly right.
It's happening again. For six years, the Democratic Party has been snoozing through a quiet, brilliantly executed Republican operation to block, stop and purge voters by the millions. As New Mexico voting rights attorney John Boyd put it, "I don't think the Democrats get it. All these new rules and games are turning voting into an obstacle course that could flip the vote to the GOP in half a dozen states."
Karl Rove once said, "We have elections like those run in countries where the guys in charge are, you know, colonels in mirrored glasses." He wasn't complaining; he was boasting.
I know that the Obama campaign is not happy that I bring up the issue of a possible theft of the election. They fear voters will be "discouraged" by the possibility that the election is fixed.
Well, frankly, if you're too bummed out by this recitation of facts and statistics to vote, then maybe you don't deserve to vote, or to drive or to reproduce. Did Martin Luther King say, "I have a dream ... so I'm going back to sleep"?
Votes can't be saved by "hope" alone. There are simple ways to protect your own vote, from walking in your "mail-in" to refusing a provisional ballot. (You can download the list at StealBackYourVote.org, written with Bobby Kennedy, a professor of law.)
It comes down to this: Can the margin of trickery, vote suppression and ballot destruction - three to six million votes - be overcome? Yes. Because they can't steal all the votes all the time. Two days before the election, John McCain is down by only 4 percent in some polls. But these are polls of "likely" voters. They exclude first-time and many low-income voters.
So, the answer to vote suppression is for something unlikely to happen - for the "unlikely" voters to simply overwhelm the statistical assumption of their laziness. As I'm sure Mr. Obama, a professor of constitutional law, could tell you: the best legal response to systematic vote suppression is to get off yo' ass!
--------
Greg Palast is the co-author of "Block the Vote," in this month's Rolling Stone Magazine, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Palast and Kennedy are also co-authors of the investigative comic book, "Steal Back Your Vote." Palast, who reports on election fraud for BBC Television, is a Nation Institute/Puffin Foundation fellow for investigative reporting. Prior to his becoming a journalist, Palast was a forensic economist, fraud investigator and taught economics and statistics at Indiana University. palast@gregpalast.net
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|