Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 49
Sign: Virgo
City: WILKES BARRE
State: PENNSYLVANIA
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/3/2006
|
|
|
|
Saturday, August 05, 2006
 |
Greens Defend PA Candidate for US Senate Against Democrat Slurs
Green Party of the United States www.gp.org
Friday, August 4, 2006
Contacts: Scott McLarty, Media Coordinator, 202-518-5624, mclarty@greens.org Starlene Rankin, Media Coordinator, 916-995-3805, starlene@greens.org
Greens respond to Democrats' slurs against Pennsylvania candidate
-
Allegations come from Democrats trying to discredit Carl Romanelli, Green for U.S. Senate, and limit choice on the ballot for Pennsylvania voters; Greens note that Rick Santorum (R) and Bob Casey (D) both support the Iraq War and oppose women's reproductive rights
-
Greens running for Governor and Lt. Governor also on Pennsylvania ballot
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Green Party leaders across the U.S. responded to misinformation and panicky accusations by Democrats against Carl Romanelli, a Green candidate running in Pennsylvania for the U.S. Senate <http://www.romanelli2006.com>.
Mr. Romanelli, competing for imcumbent Rick Santorum's (R) seat, will be placed on the ballot after his supporters submitted over 95,000 petition signatures (67,070 were required) to the state's Bureau of Elections on August 1.
Supporters of Mr. Romanelli's Democratic opponent in the race, Bob Casey, have objected to Mr. Romanelli's acceptance of campaign contributions from registered Republicans, and have falsely accused Mr. Romanelli of accepting money from the Pennsylvania Green Party in violation of contribution limits.
"This is a craven and dishonest ploy by Democrats who seem to believe that the field should be limited to two parties," said Marakay Rogers, Green candidate for Governor of Pennsylvania <http://www.geocities.com/mjr91/RogersforAG.html>.
"The Democratic Party apparently needs a lesson in civics and democracy."
Carl Romanelli joins two other Greens seeking statewide office in Pennsylvania, Ms. Rogers for Governor and Christina Valente for Lieutenant Governor. Pennsylvania Greens are awaiting a decision by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the Constitutionality of Pennsylvania's ballot access law filed by Ms. Rogers, a lawyer, earlier this year.
Greens responded point by point to Democrats' allegations:
-
Greens accept campaign contributions from Greens, Democrats, Republicans, and others all the time, just as Democrats and Republicans accept contributions from registered members of each others' parties. There is nothing illegal or improper about such contributions. Greens, however, refuse money from corporations -- unlike Democrats and Republicans -- and have called for corporate contributions to be outlawed.
-
Contrary to the Casey campaign's accusations that the Luzerne County Green Party violated contribution limits in contributing to Mr. Romanelli's petition drive, the contribution was completely legal, under the coordinated expenditure limits between party committees and federal candidates, according to rules written by Democrats and Republicans. Furthermore, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has spent $80,000 in in-kind "coordinated expenditures" to benefit the Casey Campaign, and the Pennsylvania Democratic Party has spent $25,000 in in-kind "coordinated expenditures" to benefit the Casey campaign.
-
The Green Party provides voters with an alternative to the Democrats and Republicans. If Mr. Romanelli were not in the race, voters would be limited to Mr. Casey and Mr. Santorum, both of whom support the war on Iraq, oppose women's reproductive rights and equality for gay Americans, and accept contributions from powerful corporations seeking to influence their votes in the U.S. Senate. "Voters in Pennsylvania who want to bring our troops home from Iraq and support a woman's right to choose deserve a choice on Election Day. With Carl Romanelli on the ballot, Pennsylvanians have that choice," said Nan Garrett, spokesperson for the Green Party's National Women's Caucus.
-
Despite accusations repeated in an August 1 Associated Press story <http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/....>, a Green candidate cannot "steal" or "siphon" votes away from a Democratic candidate, because a Democratic candidate doesn't own anyone's votes (except his or her own). Voters in Pennsylvania and everywhere else in the U.S. are free to vote for whomever represents their interests and ideals.
-
Greens urge Democrats and Republicans to stop distracting the electorate with insinuations that only Democrats and Republicans are entitled to be on the ballot and receive votes, and instead to enact reforms like Instant Run Off Voting (IRV). IRV allows voters to rank their choices in the order of their preference, ensures that winners have majority support, and eliminates accusations like 'vote-splitting' and 'spoiling' from our political lexicon.
"Until Democrats take steps to bring IRV to Pennsylvania, we can only assume they'd rather see a Republican victory than tolerate Greens and other parties on the ballot," said Paul Teese, chair of the Green Party of Pennsylvania.
For more information about IRV, visit <http://www.fairvote.org>.
"Our electoral system has been corrupted -- not by the participation of third parties and third party candidates, but by two-party rule," said Liz Arnone, New Jersey Green and co-chair of the Green Party of the United States. "Elections have been ruined by the influence of corporate money on Democratic and Republican politicians; by tampering with computer voting machines, obstruction of votes, and other irregularities, all of which were evident in the 2000 and 2004 national elections; and by Democratic and Republic attempts to hinder other parties through restrictive ballot access laws."
For more on 2004 election irregularities and the Green response, visit <http://www.iwantmyvote.com>. For Green campaign listings, news, photos, and web sites, visit the Green Party's candidate spotlight page <http://www.gp.org/2006elections> and the Green elections database <http://www.greens.org/elections>, which lists all 2006 candidates.
MORE INFORMATION
Green Party of the United States http://www.gp.org 1700 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 404 Washington, DC 20009. 202-319-7191, 866-41GREEN Fax 202-319-7193
Green Party of Pennsylvania http://www.gpofpa.org/ |
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, August 05, 2006
 |
The media never mentioned all of Casey's contributors, so I did their work for them!
NUMBER ONE CONTRIBUTORS TO CASEY AND SANTORUM ARE THE SAME FIRM.
Bob Casey (D) Blank Rome LLP $67,775 Simmons Cooper LLC $45,000 Berger & Montague $42,150 Goldberg, Persky et al $38,950 Kline & Specter $31,700 Kirkpatrick, Lockhart et al $29,577 Baron & Budd $29,531 Reed Smith LLP $27,125 Wolf, Block et al $24,350 Willig, Williams & Davidson $23,450 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania $21,450 Bernstein, Liebhard et al $20,700 United Food & Commercial Workers Union $20,665 Raynes, McCanty et al $19,200 Buchanan Ingersoll $18,700 Kane Warehousing $17,800 Stevens & Lee Law Firm $17,550 Pepper Hamilton LLP $17,250 Schiffrin & Barroway $16,800 Childrens Research & Education Institute $16,000
Rick Santorum (R)* Blank Rome LLP $118,350 Federated Investors Inc $102,100 Exelon Corp $73,200 Day & Zimmerman $52,400 Sunoco Inc $46,800 PPL Corp $41,800 Duane Morris LLP $38,250 Bear Stearns $37,065 Comcast Corp $36,950 WPP Group $36,300 Mellon Financial Corp $35,750 Welsh, Carson et al $35,000 American Express $34,250 Blue Cross/Blue Shield $33,906 US Steel $33,400 Reed Smith LLP $32,250 First Quality Products $30,600 Citigroup Inc $29,250 JJ White Inc $29,000 CONSOL Energy $27,500
Bob Casey (D) Lawyers/Law Firms $1,985,059 Retired $358,530 Leadership PACs $233,700 Real Estate $190,525 Securities & Investment $143,575 Education $112,749 Lobbyists $108,450 Business Services $100,150 Misc Finance $94,412 Health Professionals $83,435 Public Sector Unions $81,450 Industrial Unions $71,100 Building Trade Unions $71,000 Printing & Publishing $69,300 TV/Movies/Music $68,250 Insurance $59,575 Misc Unions $58,415 Democratic/Liberal $58,100 Misc Business $54,771 Civil Servants/Public Officials $54,010
Rick Santorum (R)* Lawyers/Law Firms $1,015,271 Retired $1,013,090 Securities & Investment $855,210 Real Estate $677,740 Insurance $510,641 Health Professionals $436,338 Leadership PACs $422,023 Pharmaceuticals/Health Products $416,502 Lobbyists $363,404 Misc Finance $332,695 Misc Business $328,717 Commercial Banks $284,950 General Contractors $264,150 Electric Utilities $253,851 Hospitals/Nursing Homes $225,118 Misc Manufacturing & Distributing $213,024 Oil & Gas $207,240 Business Services $203,051 TV/Movies/Music $191,600 Construction Services $182,040
OPENSECRETS.ORG
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, August 05, 2006
 |
Dems dispute petition of Green Partys Romanelli
Democrat challenges validity of signatures Wilkes-Barre resident got to run for office.
I think that they want the position back where the only qualification (Democrat) Bob Casey needs to run is that hes not (Republican) Rick Santorum. With me in the race were able to highlight the similarities in the candidates. Carl Romanelli
State Democratic Party officials announced Friday they would most likely challenge the signatures gathered by Pennsylvania U.S. Senate Green Party Candidate Carl Romanelli campaign.
Pennsylvania Democratic Committee Chairman T.J. Rooney publicly challenged the validity of petition signatures gathered by a company paid for by Romanellis campaign, citing several incidents of potential fraud.
We have found excessive and serious instances of multiple signatures by the same persons, unregistered voters and fake names, Rooney said through a press release issued Friday after his press conference. Given this rampant fraud and the lower number of signatures turned in, we are confident that Romanelli will be yanked from the ballot.
Romanelli, of Wilkes-Barre, said he didnt find the Democratic challenge to his petitions surprising.
I think that they want the position back where the only qualification (Democrat) Bob Casey needs to run is that hes not (Republican) Rick Santorum, Romanelli said by phone Friday after Rooneys press conference. With me in the race were able to highlight the similarities in the candidates.
Casey spokesman Larry Smar said Romanelli is being used by the Santorum campaign to siphon liberal-leaning candidates who might vote Democratic but might disagree with Caseys stances on social issues such as abortion. Romanelli previously said hes aware that the majority of the $100,000 spent to gain signatures for his campaign came primarily from GOP sources, according wire reports.
The Philadelphia Inquirer reported earlier this week that Romanelli listed $66,000 as an in-kind contribution from the Green Party in his latest campaign finance report.
But Federal Election Commission spokesman Ian Stirton, speaking generally about the law, said this week that such donations cannot exceed $5,000. Romanelli attributed the discrepancy to inexperience on the part of his campaign treasurer. We thought we had an obligation to disclose everything.
Romanelli and Green Party gubernatorial hopeful Marakay Rogers, who circulated joint petitions, have said they turned in at least 90,000 signatures Tuesday to meet the petition deadline for minor-party and independent candidates. Those candidates were required to collect 67,070 signatures this year to qualify for the Nov. 7 general election.
Romanelli estimated that half of his petition signatures were collected by JSM Inc., a Florida company that assisted Ralph Nader in other states during his 2004 presidential bid. The rest were gathered by volunteers and other paid petitioners, he said.
Rooney contended that Romanelli actually submitted only about 80,000 signatures. After reviewing about half of Romanellis signatures, the party has determined that up to 90 percent of those gathered by JSM were invalid, Rooney said.
We would have to have fewer than 15,000 of these 80,000 removed by the court in order to have Mr. Romanelli not to appear on the ballot, Rooney said.
JSM officials could not be reached for comment Friday; a listed phone number for the firm could not be found.
State law requires independent and minor-party candidates to collect a number of signatures that represents 2 percent of the ballots cast for the top vote-getter in the last statewide election. This years requirement was based on a record 3.4 million votes Casey received when he was elected to his first term as state treasurer in 2004.
The Associated Press contributed to this story.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, August 05, 2006
 |
Posted by Joshua Holland at 1:53 PM on August 3, 2006.
As Lindsay points out in Peek, TPM Muckraker figured out that it was conservative supporters of Rick Santorum who funded the $40,000 signature drive to get Green Party candidate Carl Romanelli on the Pennsylvania Senate ballot.
Shocker. Even though it's happened time and time again.
And, of course, on cue, the liberal bloggers are pulling out their knives.
Holden at First Draft, begging for a shot to the kisser, asks: "Is there any magnet for whores in this country larger than the Green Party?"
The non-evil Roger Ailes repeats the conventional nonsense that Nader was responsible for Bush and now cries about tricky Rick Santorum courting a "Selfish Green Rogue."
John Aravosis at Americablog also blames Nader for not one but "two Bush presidencies," and demands that the "Green Party candidate return the money and pull out of the race." (Recall how snippy John got when some of his readers had the nerve to question his ethics for accepting a bloggers' trip to Amsterdam paid for by the Dutch government.)
And Scott Lemieux at Lawyers, Guns and Money thinks "the Republicans are funding a Useful Idiot Party candidate for the Pennsylvania Senate."
[OK, deep, calming breath.* These are otherwise good people, Holland, and it's not the time for an obscenity-laced tirade.]
Of course Repubs help Greens get on the ballot. That's the way the system's set up. And is that somehow the Green candidate's fault? Or is it the fault of the Dems and Repubs? Are the Greens somehow responsible for the fact that you need to collect 100,000 friggin' signatures to get on the Pennsylvania ballot? Why not put the blame where it belongs?
This whining has become a maddening tradition, and it just makes me crazy how short-sighted people are.
You'd think from reading those clips that these bloggers hate spoilers, but they don't. Spoilers -- a constant stream of Republican-backed Green Party candidates -- don't bother them in the least.
If they did, they'd talk all the time about the clean elections model, they'd talk about Instant Runoff Voting and they'd talk about how ludicrous these onerous ballot requirements are.
They'd talk about what an unbelievable joke it is to call the U.S. a democracy and guarantee everyone the right to participate, and then set the price of entry at $40,000 dollars.
But we hear so little about those things that we can only conclude that they love spoilers. After all, it's something to bitch about, and it's someone to blame when the Dems ignore the issues most important to Americans, roll over for the Repubs and lose.
If we had a couple of hundred Ned Lamonts -- people who can throw one and a half mil into the ring along with their hat -- then it wouldn't be an issue. But we don't, so it is.
Now, I'm pragmatic enough to hold my nose and root for a Casey win, because Santorum's among the most odious of wing-nuts and I want to see a Dem Senate that won't rubber stamp Bush's madness. (And whoever thinks some no-name, no-money Greenie is going to swing the Pennsylvania vote to Man-on-dog Santorum needs to share what he or she's smoking with the rest of us. Seen the polls lately?)
But I can promise you, as a former Green who's now a disgusted, Dem-leaning, independent liberal swing-voter -- I've been on both sides of this question -- that if progressives and Greens and Dems can't get together on the basics of small "d" democracy, we have zero chance of ever creating a broad coalition in the American left. We simply will never see eye-to-eye as long as the Dems are indistinguishable fro the Repubs on these basic questions of American political participation.
*I'm grumpy because the heat index is at 105 degrees. I'm going to head to the damn supermarket and hang out in their industrial-strength AC until I'm my usual perky self.
Joshua Holland is a staff writer at Alternet and a regular contributor to The Gadflyer.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, June 23, 2006
 |
CARL ROMANELLI FOR UNITED STATES SENATE
308 SPRING STREET, HANOVER TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA
570-824-9442
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 22, 2006
Romanelli campaign invites Casey campaign to join debate talks. Green calls for Casey pledge in favor of ballot access and honest debate.
Green Party US Senate candidate, Carl Romanelli, today issued a statement inviting Bob Casey, or his campaign, to join the Romanelli and Santorum officials in meaningful debate discussions. Debate is the best method of informing voters as to the candidates positions on issues and their respective visions for America, Romanelli said.
It would be an utter disservice to not allow voters to hear from all of the candidates on the issues. The choice for US Senate should not be one in which the voters are offered sound bites and negative attack ads, as is usually the case with money politics. I want to lead and offer the voters of Pennsylvania a better method of choosing candidates policy debate. Any candidate who truly believes he is worthy of the greatest legislative house in the world, should be willing to demonstrate he is committed to the people, not his contributors. This is an opportunity for all of the candidates in this race to define where America should be headed in 2006. I am willing to debate and confident in my vision for our country
Romanelli also pointed out his appreciation of Senator Santorums willingness to debate.
Everyone in the United States is probably aware that Senator Santorum and I are polar opposites when it comes to the issues of our day. Yet, our junior senator is willing to put those differences in the open and let the people decide. We in the Green Party respect that, and we feel respected in that the Santorum campaign has included us in the discussions and the Green Party wants Bob Casey to know he is welcome, too.
I understand that Mr. Caseys campaign is concerned that the Green Party may not qualify for the ballot. Considering the standard we are held to, it will be difficult. I just dont see that as a problem. If we do not qualify, then we will not debate. The Greens are determined to qualify, and until such time as we are excluded we deserve to be included, Romanelli advised.
Romanelli is also calling on Bob Casey to pledge that he will not use his influence and wealth to impede the candidate, should he qualify. Id like to hear Bob Casey publicly pledge that the Democrats lawyers do not try to bully the Greens off of the ballot. A true leader is confident enough let the policy speak for itself. A true patriotism is such that the ideas of viable candidates, even on opposite side of the issues, are heard, Romanelli claimed. Romanelli continues to seek the assistance of rank and file Democrats and Republicans regarding the petition requirement. He as asked several times, publicly, for acknowledgement from the other candidates regarding the right of legitimate political parties to bring issues to the voters. He also remains outspoken concerning the inequities in Pennsylvania law, insofar as third parties and independents are concerned.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, June 17, 2006
 |
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 15, 2006
Contacts:
Romanelli Campaign: Shane Novak 570-793-1338
Santorum Campaign: Virginia Davis 215-528-9368
ROMANELLI, SANTORUM AGREE TO DISCUSS DEBATE SCHEDULE
Green Party candidate concerned about ballot qualification, seeks help of Republicans and Democrats
The campaigns of US Senator, Rick Santorum and Green Party US Senate candidate, Carl Romanelli have agreed today to begin discussions concerning the debate schedule and format for the upcoming general election. Both candidates are hoping that the Casey campaign will also agree to discussions. I was pleased to be contacted by the senators campaign, said Romanelli. Ive always believed debate on the substance of issues is the best method for Pennsylvanians to learn where candidates stand on issues.
The Green Party has expressed open concerns about whether the party will be able to qualify its statewide candidates. This year independent and third parties must gather a minimum of 67,072 voter signatures, in order to legally qualify for the Pennsylvania ballot. The figure represents an historic high, and more than double the previous high. Comparatively, Republicans and Democrats need only gather 2,000 signatures of members of their respective parties.
The Pennsylvania General Assembly is currently considering capping the requirement at 45,000, but shortening the time third parties have to gather those signatures. We are opposed to this legislation (H.B. 544) and see it as an attempt by the legislature to affect the federal appeal of the Pennsylvania Ballot Access Coalition, Romanelli contends.
We would be in better shape if the legislature just ignored the issue until the court case has run its course, Romanelli added.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 15, 2006
Contacts:
Romanelli Campaign: Shane Novak 570-793-1338
Santorum Campaign: Virginia Davis 215-528-9368
ROMANELLI, SANTORUM AGREE TO DISCUSS DEBATE SCHEDULE
Green Party candidate concerned about ballot qualification, seeks help of Republicans and Democrats
The campaigns of US Senator, Rick Santorum and Green Party US Senate candidate, Carl Romanelli have agreed today to begin discussions concerning the debate schedule and format for the upcoming general election. Both candidates are hoping that the Casey campaign will also agree to discussions. I was pleased to be contacted by the senators campaign, said Romanelli. Ive always believed debate on the substance of issues is the best method for Pennsylvanians to learn where candidates stand on issues.
The Green Party has expressed open concerns about whether the party will be able to qualify its statewide candidates. This year independent and third parties must gather a minimum of 67,072 voter signatures, in order to legally qualify for the Pennsylvania ballot. The figure represents an historic high, and more than double the previous high. Comparatively, Republicans and Democrats need only gather 2,000 signatures of members of their respective parties.
The Pennsylvania General Assembly is currently considering capping the requirement at 45,000, but shortening the time third parties have to gather those signatures. We are opposed to this legislation (H.B. 544) and see it as an attempt by the legislature to affect the federal appeal of the Pennsylvania Ballot Access Coalition, Romanelli contends.
We would be in better shape if the legislature just ignored the issue until the court case has run its course, Romanelli added.
Carl Romanelli is issuing a challenge to the Santorum and Casey campaigns, in that he wants Democrats and Republicans to help the Greens qualify for the ballot. Since it is Mr. Caseys vote total of nearly 3.5 million in 2004 that has resulted in this years standard being so high, we feel it is only fair that the old parties help bring the Greens to the debate. If these candidates believe their policies are best for America, then I challenge them both to put their ideas and values up against mine, Romanelli declared. I am issuing this challenge publicly because I want a public answer, Romanelli concluded.
Carl Romanelli is issuing a challenge to the Santorum and Casey campaigns, in that he wants Democrats and Republicans to help the Greens qualify for the ballot. Since it is Mr. Caseys vote total of nearly 3.5 million in 2004 that has resulted in this years standard being so high, we feel it is only fair that the old parties help bring the Greens to the debate. If these candidates believe their policies are best for America, then I challenge them both to put their ideas and values up against mine, Romanelli declared. I am issuing this challenge publicly because I want a public answer, Romanelli concluded.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, March 24, 2006
 |
WILKES-BARRE — City resident Carl Romanelli Jr. wants to take the Green Party platform all the way to Washington, D.C.
Romanelli, 47, accepted the party's nomination Sunday for U.S. Senate. He will be Pennsylvania's first ever Green Party candidate for that office.
"People in the United States are dissatisfied. They're ready for a change," Romanelli said during his acceptance speech.
The passionate political activist received unanimous support from the delegates at the Pennsylvania Green Party Nominating Convention, which was held this past weekend at the Genetti Best Western Hotel and Convention Center. It concluded Sunday afternoon.
Over the weekend the party nominated 13 people for public office. Six people, including Wyoming County resident Jay Sweeney, were nominated for State Representative. Four people were nominated for U.S. Congress, and three people were nominated for statewide offices.
Pennsylvania Green party chairman Paul Teese, of Quakertown, Bucks County, believes the party has candidates capable of serving in the offices they seek, but concedes the odds of winning are against them.
Romanelli, on the other hand, believes Pennsylvania voters can look past political affiliation and elect the best candidates.
He thinks voters are fed up with the current system, and that people are ready for a candidate who has the interests of the voters at heart, not corporations.
"We have the responsibility to do better. All we lack is the will to do so," Romanelli said.
He is opposed to the Iraq war because he does not want his tax dollars funding a conflict he believes is bankrupting this country and compromising national security.
He also supports gay marriage, preserving social security, the elimination of pensions for the president and Congress, universal health care, raising the minimum wage and the decriminalization of cannabis.
©The Citizens Voice 2006
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
 |
Carl Romanelli, the Green Party's challenger to U.S. Sen. Rick Santorum this November, doesn't have a large entourage. He can't afford one with a campaign war chest currently containing less than $5,000. But the former family courts officer from Luzerne County in northeastern Pennsylvania said yesterday during a trip through Philadelphia for a peace rally that his grassroots campaign is growing in strength. "You start by reaching one heart and one mind at a time," Romanelli, 47, said. "As Pennsylvania gets used to seeing us, they'll see there are other capable options [besides Republicans and Democrats]." Romanelli said the Green Party has growing appeal with both young voters and senior citizens because it addressess the issues that most affect those age groups, including health insurance, education and federal spending. "We need to bring the budget sensibilities that is currently lacking [at the federal level]," he said during an interview at Cosi Cafe on Chestnut Street. "It's been reported that we won't be able to pay the interest on the national debt by 2035." Romanelli is relatively new to politics. As a former registered Democrat, he said he became involved in the Green Party in 2000 after realizing that "the right wing would steal the [presidential] election and the Democrats would let them get away with it." Based out of Wilkes-Barre, Romanelli said he would be flattered to raise $1 million for his campaign, which would allow him to open campaign offices in Philadelphia, Harrisburg and Pittsburgh.
Metro.us Philadelphia, Pa Monday March, 20th 2006
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, March 21, 2006
 |
As an independent candidate for US Senate in Pennsylvania, I was pleased to see that Kate Michelman had decided not to run, also as an independent US Senate candidate, in 2006. It is not that I have any reason to oppose her candidacy, since we both share the same positions regarding defense of reproductive legal rights. Comfort is found in the idea that two like-minded folks do not have to each collect 90,000 to 100,000 voter signatures in order to appear on the 2006 Pennsylvania ballot. Additionally, I was encouraged as I read Ms. Michelman's essay concerning her decision not to run; as it indicated she intended to continue to lead in def ense of American women. Then the usual disappointment set in, bringing on that dreaded sinking feeling inside, as I read her endorsement of Bob Casey. Bob Casey?
I could not believe my eyes, not Chuck Pennacchio or Carl Romanelli, Bob Casey! Now to be treated with disrespect by those whose principles Greens defend most vigorously have become quite the common expectation on our part. In my own case, for example, I have been vocal and public in opposition to the Iraq occupation since before the war began. Yet, I am never allowed to speak when I attend events sponsored by my area's peace organizations. Greens are rarely endorsed by Sierra Club committees, despite the articulate and steadfast environmental positions taken by so many of our party's candidates. Despite rhetoric of fairness of process, Democrats continually refuse to recognize our party's right to even bring our issues to the debate. Democrats will constantly complain tha t Greens are spoilers, yet refuse to support electoral reforms (such as IRV) that would eliminate the spoiler effect. I could go on, but the only point here is that the same disrespect Greens often feel, is now the common expectation of progressive leaning Democrats, too! Kate Michelman has endorsed Bob Casey without even a primary election stand in defense of progressive policy, let alone consideration of an independent, third party candidacy.
There are just too many ways in which the Bob Casey US Senate candidacy is offensive to list them all in this piece, so I'll provide just a few. First, there are the obvious concerns about the interests Mr. Casey serves. He supports more subsidies for insurance and pharmaceutical companies, instead of universal health care for all. He supports the illegal occupation in Iraq and refuses to articulate the criminal nature of the Bush administration's foreign and domestic policies. He opposes a woman's right to legal protection of reproductive rights (You are aware of that, aren't you, Kate?). The on ly policy position Casey has even offered is his reminder, that were he now a senator, he would have voted, like Senator Santorum, in favor of the Alito nomination. Then there are the over 200 common campaign contributors of Casey and Santorum. Of course, the fact that Bob Casey thinks he is the only candidate the Democrats should run in even numbered years, reflects the arrogant sense of gluttony typical of the old parties nowadays. Since 2000, Casey has run for Auditor General, Governor, Treasurer and US Senate. How can so many not see that Bob Casey is a man working for the betterment of his bank account and pension plan (with the people's tax dollars), not a man of policy or statesmanship.
By contrast, it is with great sacrifice that I bring my candidacy to the people of Pennsylvania. I offer a complete agenda, not a single-issue, symbolic campaign. I offer a willingness to provide policy details and why such policy is supported. I offer to be a candidate committed to the people of my country, not the special, corporate interests.&nbs p; I pledge to serve with integrity and distinction, as a candidate the people can feel they trust, even if there may exist certain differences of perspective. For these reasons, and many others, I will continue to move forward with my candidacy. I respectfully disagree with the idea that voting for the problem, is somehow a solution. The only wasted vote, Kate, is one that is not cast with your values and principles behind it. Bob Casey remains the problem, not the solution. I am proud that my party offers a candidate in which voters can rest trust and hope. Maybe there are enough Pennsylvanians willing to not waste their very important vote on interests counte r to theirs, for amazing things to happen this November. If not, at least there is the satisfaction of standing for something true, not the learned helplessness of a Bob Casey endorsement.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, March 08, 2006
 |
My campaign will set up a paypal account on this site and my offical site to raise funds.
I am taking on two corporate republicans. I need your help.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|