MySpace


CT Professor



Last Updated: 3/12/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Monday, May 18, 2009 
The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point is pleased to announce the release of the May edition of the CTC Sentinel (Vol. 2, Issue 5).  The Sentinel is available for download from the CTC’s website at http://www.ctc.usma.edu/sentinel/CTCSentinel-Vol2Iss5.pdf.

 

The contents of this month’s Sentinel are:

·       “Comparing the U.S. and Soviet Experiences in Iraq” by Bruce Riedel

·       “Quetta: The Headquarters of the Afghan Taliban” by Mukhtar A. Khan

·       “Examining Saudi Arabia’s 85 Most Wanted List” by Christopher Boucek

·       “Revisiting Al-Qa..ida’s Anthrax Program” by Rene Pita and Rohan Gunaratna

·       “The Limits of Iranian Influence Among Gulf Shi..a” by Laurence Louer

·       “The Funding Methods of Bangladeshi Terrorist Groups” by Paul Cochrane

·       “Avoiding Suicide Terrorism in Bangladesh” by Ryan Clark and Shafqat Munir


Cheers


James

Thursday, April 16, 2009 

Folks,

Sorry I've been offline for a while. Just wanted to alert you that the April edition of the CTC Sentinel is now available (along with all issue from the past year) at
http://www.ctc.usma.edu/sentinel.

The contents of this month’s edition are:

·       “Defining the Punjabi Taliban Network” by Hassan Abbas

·       “The 2008 Belgium Cell and FATA’s Terrorist Pipeline” by Paul Cruickshank

·       “President Obama’s Overseas Terrorism Challenge” by Tom Sanderson

·       “Improving India’s Counterterrorism Policy After Mumbai” by Paul Staniland

·       “Leveraging History in AQIM Communications” by Lianne Kennedy Boudali

·       “AQAP a Rising Threat in Yemen” by Brian O’Neill

·       “The Role of the United Nations in Defeating Al-Qaida and Associated Groups” by Richard
Barrett






Wednesday, January 21, 2009 

The Combating Terrorism Center at West Point is pleased to announce the release of the January edition of the CTC Sentinel.  A pdf version is online at:

http://www.teachingterror.net/Sentinel/2-1.pdf

The contents of this month’s issue are:

 ·       “Al Qa..ida’s Five Aspects of Power” by The Combating Terrorism Center

·       “A Case Study of the January 2008 Suicide Bomb Plot in Barcelona” by Fernando Reinares

·       “A Holistic Critique of Singapore’s Counter-Ideological Program” by Kumar Ramakrishna

·       “Shifting Trends in Suicide Attacks” by Assaf Moghadam

·       “The Future of Moqtada al-Sadr’s New Jaysh al-Mahdi” by Babak Rahimi

·       “Reconsidering the Role of Militias in Iraq” by Major James J. Smith, U.S. Army

·       “The Pakistan Army and its Role in FATA” by Shuja Nawaz

·       “Iraq’s Border Security: Key to an Iraqi Endstate” by Lieutenant Colonel Steven Oluic, U.S. Army

Cheers

James

Saturday, January 17, 2009 
Folks,

For anyone interested, here is a link to my speech at the CATO conference, "Shaping the Obama Administration's Counterterrorism Strategy" (see Panel II, about 19 minutes into the video stream).
http://www.cato.org/counterterrorism

Also, here is the handout I refer to in the speech.
http://www.teachingterror.net/lectures/CATO%20Handout.pdf
If you would like a copy of the full paper, just e-mail me.

Cheers

James

Thursday, December 18, 2008 

Ex-terrorists may be key to reducing militancy
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
http://live.psu.edu/story/36617

University Park, Pa. -- The scourge of modern terrorism can be tackled more effectively by understanding how and why certain individuals give up their violent ways, according to a counter-terrorism expert who says information gleaned from ex-terrorists could provide clues to checking the growth of militant organizations.

"Individuals do not necessarily join extremist groups because they hold extremist views," said John Horgan, director of Penn State’s International Center for the Study of Terrorism. "Instead, they acquire extremist views after joining a militant group for other reasons."

Horgan is using his training in applied psychology to discover how people become involved in and disengage from terrorist movements. He also is interested in how terrorist networks learn, adapt and evolve, both in response to societal responses to those movements as well as in response to technological innovation.

In a new collection with his colleague Tore Bjorgo, "Leaving Terrorism Behind: Individual and Collective Disengagement" (Routledge, 2009), Horgan argues that research into factors that make a person disengage from terrorism could provide greater insight on how the seed of terrorism takes root, and how it can potentially be stopped.

"Individuals who once shrouded every detail of their lives in secrecy are willing to engage researchers on some of the thorniest questions relating to their former terrorist lives," explained Horgan, who also is associate professor of science, technology, and society at Penn State.

According to the Penn State researcher, disengagement involves a change in behavior by breaking off participation in violent groups or changing the way in which they engage in political violence.

When such individuals leave or disengage from the extremist ideals of the group, the reasons can range from disillusionment with the tactics being pursued by the group, social tensions within it, to the lure of economic support and amnesty for the terrorist.

However, attempts to accurately pin down the factors that trigger withdrawal from terrorism remains elusive. That is because researchers have been preoccupied with discovering how and why individuals become involved in terrorism, and very little attention has been paid to those who have given up terrorism or terrorist movements that have become inactive.

"Addressing these gaping holes in our understanding could in the long term better equip us to meet the challenges of terrorism and will also equip us with a strategy for counter-radicalization," said Horgan.

In one chapter, Horgan outlines some of the issues relevant to constructing a psychological perspective on disengagement from terrorism. "We have provided a series of starting points in trying to understand why certain individuals give up terrorism, and the various ways in which they reach that decision."

For starters, he seeks to narrow the discussion on individual disengagement to a few core questions: whether disengagement means leaving a group or simply assuming a new role; whether individuals leave voluntarily or involuntarily; where do individuals go after leaving terrorism and what do they do; and finally how to be sure that a person has become disengaged from terrorism and will not return to violent ways.

In addition to interviews with former terrorists of the IRA and al-Qaeda, Horgan studies autobiographies by former terrorists, communiqués, statements by movements, and discussions on Internet bulletin board to answer some of these questions.

The Penn State researcher argues that for disengagement to be successful, it will have to be tailor-made to not only the specific terrorist movement but also to the specific role or individual being targeted by the security forces.

The book is a collection of articles on counter-terrorism by leading world experts on terrorist disengagement. The authors analyze case studies of disengagement programs in places such as Columbia, northern Europe, Italy, Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia. 

The insight gained from the strengths and weaknesses of these case studies will be an invaluable guide to students, researchers and policy makers in the field of counter-terrorism.

The Penn State International Center for the Study of Terrorism is at http://www.icst.psu.edu/






Monday, December 15, 2008 
Great new website on Al Qaeda and global jihad:
http://www.jarretbrachman.net
Sunday, December 14, 2008 
Folks,

For anyone in the DC area early next month, here is some information about a counterterrorism conference I'll be speaking at:

Shaping the New Administration's Counterterrorism Strategy
January 12-13
Cato Institute, 1000 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001

http://www.cato.org/events/counterterrorism/index.html

Cheers

JF
Thursday, December 11, 2008 
Folks,

Just in time for the holidays - nearly 500 pages of riveting analysis . . .
http://www.routledgereference.com/books/Handbook-of-Defence-Politics-isbn9781857434439



James
Tuesday, December 02, 2008 
Folks,

FYI, the WMD Commission's report (below) will be released later this week online at: http://www.preventwmd.org

James
-----------------


New York Times
December 1, 2008

Panel Fears Use of Unconventional Weapon

By ERIC SCHMITT

WASHINGTON — An independent commission has concluded that terrorists will most likely carry out an attack with biological, nuclear or other unconventional weapons somewhere in the world in the next five years unless the United States and its allies act urgently to prevent that.

In a report to be released this week, the Congressionally mandated panel found that with countries like Iran and North Korea pursuing nuclear weapons programs, and with the risk of poorly secured biological pathogens growing, unconventional threats are fast outpacing the defenses arrayed to confront them.

"America's margin of safety is shrinking, not growing," the bipartisan panel concluded.

Prepared before last week's deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai — which American officials say were most likely carried out by Pakistani militant groups based in Kashmir — the report also singled out Pakistan as a top security priority for the coming Obama administration.

"Were one to map terrorism and weapons of mass destruction today, all roads would intersect in Pakistan," the report states, citing the country's terrorist haven along the border with Afghanistan and its tense relations with nuclear rival India.

"Pakistan is an ally, but there is a grave danger it could also be an unwitting source of a terrorist attack on the United States — possibly with weapons of mass destruction," the report said.

The report is the result of a six-month study by the Commission on the Prevention of Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation and Terrorism, which Congress created last spring in keeping with one of the recommendations of the 9/11 Commission.

The nine-member panel received classified briefings, conducted several site visits, including meetings in Russia, and interviewed more than 250 government and independent experts in several countries.

The New York Times obtained a copy of the report's 18-page executive summary. Details from draft chapters of the report on the threat of bioterrorism were published Sunday by The Washington Post.

The panel's 13 recommendations focus on fighting the threat of bioterrorism, including improved bioforensic capabilities, and strengthening international organizations, like the International Atomic Energy Agency, to address the nuclear threat. It also calls for a comprehensive approach for dealing with Pakistan.

Over all, the findings and recommendations seek to serve as a road map for the Obama administration.

"Unless the world community acts decisively and with great urgency, it is more likely than not that a weapon of mass destruction will be used in a terrorist attack somewhere in the world by the end of 2013," the report states in the opening sentence of the executive summary.

Commission officials said that date is a judgment based on scores of interviews and classified briefings conducted by members of the panel — led by former Senators Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida, and Jim Talent, Republican of Missouri — but does not represent a new formal assessment by the United States intelligence agencies.

Several of the recommendations are not new and have been pursued with varying degrees of success by the Bush administration. On Pakistan, for example, the panel urges the Obama administration to work with Pakistan to eliminate that country's terrorist havens, secure its nuclear and biological materials, counter extremist ideologies and constrain a "nascent nuclear arms race in Asia."

But the panel is banking on the fact that some of its Democratic members — including Wendy Sherman, Graham Allison and Tim Roemer — have advised President-elect Barack Obama on national security issues, and could serve in senior positions in his administration.

Ms. Sherman, for instance, is one of two former Clinton administration officials leading the transition team at the State Department for Mr. Obama.

In its wide-ranging findings, the panel faulted the Bush administration for failing to devote the same degree of high-level attention and resources to the threat of a bioterrorist attack as it has to prevent nuclear proliferation and a nuclear attack.

The report calls for conducting a major review of the program to secure dangerous pathogens and tighten oversight of high-containment laboratories.

The commission urges the Obama administration to work to halt the Iranian and North Korean nuclear weapons programs, backing up any diplomatic initiatives with "the credible threat of direct action" — code for military action, a commission official said.

Two weeks ago, the International Atomic Energy Agency reported that Iran had produced roughly enough nuclear material to make, with added purification, a single atom bomb.

The commission also criticized the administration and Congress for not organizing themselves more effectively to combat the threat of unconventional weapons. The report recommended a single White House-level office or individual responsible for directing the nation's policy to prevent the spread of unconventional weapons and their possible use by terrorists.

Like the 9/11 Commission, this panel called for overhauling the jurisdiction of the Congressional committee that reviews the proliferation of unconventional weapons. "Congressional oversight is dysfunctional," the report concluded.

Saturday, November 22, 2008 
 

ODNI Releases Global Trends Projections

A full copy of the report is available online at: http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html

By 2025, the accelerating pace of globalization and the emergence of new powers will produce a world order vastly different from the system in place for most of the post-World War II era, according to a projection by the federal government's top intelligence analysts.
 
The projection, prepared by the National Intelligence Council of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, was made public by the ODNI today.
 
The ODNI report, "Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World" projects a still-preeminent U.S. joined by fast developing powers, notably India and China, atop a multipolar international system.  The world of the near future will be subject to an increased likelihood of conflict over scarce resources, including food and water, and will be haunted by the persistence of rogue states and terrorist groups with greater access to nuclear weapons, the report says.  Widening gaps in birth rates and wealth-to-poverty ratios, and the uneven impact of climate change, could further exacerbate tensions, "Global Trends 2025" concludes.
 
The report extrapolates from current and projected trends.  It is not a prediction, and the authors stress that "bad outcomes are not inevitable."
 
"International leadership and cooperation will be necessary to solve the global challenges and to understand the complexities surrounding them," the report concludes.
 
"By laying out some of the alternative possibilities we hope to help policymakers steer us toward more positive solutions."
 
Other projections in "Global Trends 2025": include:

• Russia's emergence as a world power is clouded by lagging investment in its energy sector and the persistence of crime and government corruption.

• Muslim states outside the Arab core – Turkey, Indonesia, even a post-clerical Iran – could take on expanded roles in the new international order.

• A government in Eastern or Central Europe could be effectively taken over and run by organized crime. In parts of Africa and South Asia, some states might wither away as governments fail to provide security and other basic needs.

• A worldwide shift to a new technology that replaces oil will be under way or accomplished by 2025.

• Multiple financial centers will serve as 'shock absorbers' in the world financial system. The U.S. dollar's role will shrink to 'first among equals' in a basket of key world currencies.

• The likelihood that nuclear weapons will be used will increase with expanded access to technology and a widening range of options for limited strikes.

• The impact of climate change will be uneven, with some Northern economies, notably Russia and Canada, profiting from longer growing seasons and improved access to resource reserves. 
The Global Trends series examines geopolitical trends and analyzes their likely outcomes, in an attempt to prompt public discussion of possible responses. The projections have covered five-year intervals, beginning with Global Trends 2010 issued in November 1997.

A full copy of the report is available online at: http://www.dni.gov/nic/NIC_2025_project.html

The Director of National Intelligence oversees 16 federal organizations that make up the U.S. intelligence community. The DNI also manages the implementation of the National Intelligence Program. Additionally, the DNI serves as the principal adviser to the president, the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council on intelligence issues related to national security.