MySpace


Donovan



Last Updated: 5/1/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 100
Sign: Aries

City: WASHINGTON
State: Washington DC
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/20/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 

Current mood:  contemplative
Category: News and Politics
A Farewell to Harms

Palin was bad for the Republicans—and the republic.



By Peggy Noonan

Sarah Palin's resignation gives Republicans a new opportunity to see her plain—to review the bidding, see her strengths, acknowledge her limits, and let go of her drama. It is an opportunity they should take. They mean to rebuild a great party. They need to do it on solid ground.

Her history does not need to be rehearsed at any length. Ten months ago she was embraced with friendliness by her party. The left and the media immediately overplayed their hand, with attacks on her children. The party rallied round, as a party should. She went on the trail a sensation but demonstrated in the ensuing months that she was not ready to go national and in fact never would be. She was hungry, loved politics, had charm and energy, loved walking onto the stage, waving and doing the stump speech. All good. But she was not thoughtful. She was a gifted retail politician who displayed the disadvantages of being born into a point of view (in her case a form of conservatism; elsewhere and in other circumstances, it could have been a form of liberalism) and swallowing it whole: She never learned how the other sides think, or why.

In television interviews she was out of her depth in a shallow pool. She was limited in her ability to explain and defend her positions, and sometimes in knowing them. She couldn't say what she read because she didn't read anything. She was utterly unconcerned by all this and seemed in fact rather proud of it: It was evidence of her authenticity. She experienced criticism as both partisan and cruel because she could see no truth in any of it. She wasn't thoughtful enough to know she wasn't thoughtful enough. Her presentation up to the end has been scattered, illogical, manipulative and self-referential to the point of self-reverence. "I'm not wired that way," "I'm not a quitter," "I'm standing up for our values." I'm, I'm, I'm.

In another age it might not have been terrible, but here and now it was actually rather horrifying.

McCain-Palin lost. Mrs. Palin has now stepped down, but she continues to poll high among some members of the Republican base, some of whom have taken to telling themselves Palin myths.

To wit, "I love her because she's so working-class." This is a favorite of some party intellectuals. She is not working class, never was, and even she, avid claimer of advantage that she is, never claimed to be and just lets others say it. Her father was a teacher and school track coach, her mother the school secretary. They were middle-class figures of respect, stability and local status. I think intellectuals call her working-class because they see the makeup, the hair, the heels and the sleds and think they're working class "tropes." Because, you know, that's what they teach in "Ways of the Working Class" at Yale and Dartmouth.

What she is, is a seemingly very nice middle-class girl with ambition, appetite and no sense of personal limits.

"She's not Ivy League, that's why her rise has been thwarted! She represented the democratic ideal that you don't have to go to Harvard or Brown to prosper, and her fall represents a failure of egalitarianism." This comes from intellectuals too. They need to be told something. Ronald Reagan went to Eureka College. Richard Nixon went to Whittier College, Joe Biden to the University of Delaware. Sarah Palin graduated in the end from the University of Idaho, a school that happily notes on its Web site that it's included in U.S. News & World Report's top national schools survey. They need to be told, too, that the first Republican president was named "Abe," and he went to Princeton and got a Fulbright. Oh wait, he was an impoverished backwoods autodidact!

America doesn't need Sarah Palin to prove it was, and is, a nation of unprecedented fluidity. Her rise and seeming fall do nothing to prove or refute this.

"The elites hate her." The elites made her. It was the elites of the party, the McCain campaign and the conservative media that picked her and pushed her. The base barely knew who she was. It was the elites, from party operatives to public intellectuals, who advanced her and attacked those who said she lacked heft. She is a complete elite confection. She might as well have been a bonbon.

"She makes the Republican Party look inclusive." She makes the party look stupid, a party of the easily manipulated.

"She shows our ingenuous interest in all classes." She shows your cynicism.

"Now she can prepare herself for higher office by studying up, reading in, boning up on the issues." Mrs. Palin's supporters have been ordering her to spend the next two years reflecting and pondering. But she is a ponder-free zone. She can memorize the names of the presidents of Pakistan, but she is not going to be able to know how to think about Pakistan. Why do her supporters not see this? Maybe they think "not thoughtful" is a working-class trope!

"The media did her in." Her lack of any appropriate modesty did her in. Actually, it's arguable that membership in the self-esteem generation harmed her. For 30 years the self-esteem movement told the young they're perfect in every way. It's yielding something new in history: an entire generation with no proper sense of inadequacy.

"Turning to others means the media won!" No, it means they lose. What the mainstream media wants is not to kill her but to keep her story going forever. She hurts, as they say, the Republican brand, with her mess and her rhetorical jabberwocky and her careless causing of division. Really, she is the most careless sower of discord since George W. Bush, who fractured the party and the movement that made him. Why wouldn't the media want to keep that going?

Here's why all this matters. The world is a dangerous place. It has never been more so, or more complicated, more straining of the reasoning powers of those with actual genius and true judgment. This is a time for conservative leaders who know how to think.

Here are a few examples of what we may face in the next 10 years: a profound and prolonged American crash, with the admission of bankruptcy and the spread of deep social unrest; one or more American cities getting hit with weapons of mass destruction from an unknown source; faint glimmers of actual secessionist movements as Americans for various reasons and in various areas decide the burdens and assumptions of the federal government are no longer attractive or legitimate.

The era we face, that is soon upon us, will require a great deal from our leaders. They had better be sturdy. They will have to be gifted. There will be many who cannot, and should not, make the cut. Now is the time to look for those who can. And so the Republican Party should get serious, as serious as the age, because that is what a grown-up, responsible party—a party that deserves to lead—would do.

It's not a time to be frivolous, or to feel the temptation of resentment, or the temptation of thinking next year will be more or less like last year, and the assumptions of our childhoods will more or less reign in our future. It won't be that way.

We are going to need the best.

Copyright 2009 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Source: Wall Street Journal

+++

Wow that was a mouthful, right? Before the conservatives attack me for posting this article, keep in mind, it was posted in the conservative Wall Street Journal and that Ms. Noonan “served as a special assistant to President Ronald Reagan, where she became one of the most renowned political speechwriters of her generation. In 1988, she was chief speechwriter for George H.W. Bush’s presidential bid, during which she coined the phrases "a kinder, gentler nation," "a thousand points of light," and "read my lips: no new taxes."

(Source)

With that said, (1) Do the mainstream media/press want Governor Palin in the spotlight so that they can hurt the Republican Party? (2) Is Gov. Palin an asset or liability to her party or to conservatives? (3) Is she a breath of fresh air for a Party that has lost its way? (4) Is or will Gov. Palin be “sturdy” enough to face crises in the “dangerous” world above which Ms. Noonan describes? (5) What do you think Gov. Palin plans to do when she steps down later this month from her role as Alaska’s chief executive?

As always, everyone is welcome to share her or his thoughts in favor or against this thread. Remember, thoughtful, intelligent people can disagree without resorting to name calling or profanity. (There are tons of blogs and forums on MySpace that cater to those sorts of conversations.)

Feel free to leave those rather elusive kudos. 
Monday, July 06, 2009 

Current mood:FinalFantasyGroupie'd!
Category: Writing and Poetry
Friday, June 26, 2009 

Current mood:  shocked
Category: News and Politics
R.I.P. King of Pop






If video fails to play click here or visit its YouTube located at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHLgNwW-Mrg


This post is written by Jon Pareles, Ben Sisario and Brian Stelter in New York and Brooks Barnes in Los Angeles. Michael Jackson, the singer, songwriter and dancer who earned the title “King of Pop” in a career that reached unprecedented peaks of sales and attention, died Thursday at 1:07 p.m. Pacific time, a Los Angeles city official confirmed. He was 50.

The circumstances of Mr. Jackson’s death were not immediately clear. He was unconscious when rushed to UCLA Medical Center on Thursday afternoon by paramedics who performed C.P.R., according to the Los Angeles Fire Department. Mr. Jackson’s 1982 album “Thriller” is the best-selling album of all time, claiming global sales of more than 100 million copies. But Mr. Jackson was a star before and after “Thriller,” from his days as the piping lead singer of the Jackson 5 to his increasingly bitter final albums. He was forever a paradox: a precocious child star, a childlike grown-up, a superhumanly skilled performer who always appeared vulnerable, a figure who pursued worldwide fame only to find himself besieged and embittered by media attention.

In the 1980’s, he was the embodiment of American pop success, with his ubiquitous hits and video clips, his one white glove and his moonwalk, dancing across stages and heard on radio worldwide. But that success could not last forever, and Mr. Jackson struggled in its aftermath.

Source: The New York Times


***

I am honestly shocked and surprised how affected I am by this news. Please share your thoughts.
Thursday, June 25, 2009 

Current mood:  contemplative
Category: News and Politics

Farrah Fawcett Succumbs to Cancer at 62



Iconic 'Charlie's Angels' Actress Loses Cancer Battle, Dies in Santa Monica Hospital

By SHEILA MARIKAR

June 25, 2009—
Farrah Fawcett, the 1970s "It Girl" who was known for her cascading golden hair and bombshell body, died in a Santa Monica hospital today, ABC News has learned. She was 62-years-old.

"After a long and brave battle with cancer, our beloved Farrah has passed away," Fawcett's longtime romantic partner Ryan O'Neal said in a statement released by Fawcett's publicist, Paul Bloch. "Although this is an extremely difficult time for her family and friends, we take comfort in the beautiful times that we shared with Farrah over the years and the knowledge that her life brought joy to so many people around the world."

Fawcett became a symbol of the will to survive through her years-long battle with cancer, which was chronicled in the recent TV documentary "Farrah's Story." Her death comes on the heels of O'Neal's declaration that she agreed to marry him.

"I've asked her to marry me, again, and she's agreed," O'Neal, 68, told Barbara Walters in an exclusive interview for ABC's "20/20" scheduled to air Thursday. Walters sat down with O'Neal and others close to Fawcett in the final days of the actress' life.
Fawcett and O'Neal began dating in 1980 and lived together with son Redmond. The two never officially tied the knot, but not for O'Neal's lack of trying.

"I used to ask her to marry me all the time," he said. "But ... it just got to be a joke, you know. We just joked about it."

Now, Fawcett leaves behind O'Neal, their 24-year-old son and her father, James. She was previously married to Lee Majors, star of "The Six Million Dollar Man," from 1973 to 1982.

Fawcett
was diagnosed with anal cancer in 2006. Although doctors declared her free of cancer in February 2007, a few months later they learned that the cancer had returned.
Fawcett's alternative approach to her cancer treatment was surrounded by much controversy. After her initial diagnosis, Fawcett received traditional treatments in California.

According to People.com, Fawcett was "disheartened" by both the reoccurrence of the cancer and the treatment she was receiving in the United States, so she traveled to Germany's University Clinic in Frankfurt in search of an alternative course of treatment.

Some reports have said that she received experimental stem cell treatment while in Germany. But Craig Nevius, who helped produce "Farrah's Story," told ABCNews.com that while details of the stem cell treatment have been widely reported, it has never been confirmed by the actress or sources close to her.
Last year, an employee at the UCLA Medical Center was disciplined for accessing Fawcett's medical records, a few weeks after the hospital announced that several employees had been fired for snooping in Britney Spears' records.

Fawcett's attorney told The Associated Press that an employee at the hospital reviewed the actress' medical records without authorization and then details about her treatment appeared in the tabloid the National Enquirer.

Though Fawcett returned home earlier this year, taking a break from long hospital stays, according to People magazine, the actress returned to the hospital for at least two weeks prior to her death.

Farrah Fawcett's Life in the Limelight

Fawcett first stepped into the spotlight playing Jill Munroe in the TV series "Charlie's Angels" in the 1970s. The series became a smash hit and Fawcett quickly became an iconic pin-up model for millions of men. She pioneered a feathered hairstyle dubbed the "Farrah Do" or "Farrah Hair" that remained in vogue throughout the decade.

She later went on to earn one of three career Emmy Award nominations for her role as a battered wife in the acclaimed television movie "The Burning Bed."

Fawcett stirred controversy when she posed nude in the December 1995 issue of Playboy, but buzz about the actress baring all only served to make the magazine fly off newsstands -- the issue was Playboy's most successful of the 1990s, with over 4 million copies sold worldwide.

Defying naysayers, in 1997, at age 50, Fawcett posed again for the July issue of Playboy, which also sold well.

Fawcett's last project was closely tied to her illness. "Farrah's Story," the 90-minute documentary chronicling her battle with cancer, featured footage shot by Fawcett and her friends on a home video camera. It aired on NBC in May, attracting 8.9 million viewers.

The film showed both the ugly and uplifting sides of her struggle, juxtaposing video of Fawcett vomiting and shaving her head with scenes of her dancing with friends during times when her health was up. "Farrah's Story" also featured moving footage of her lying on a hospital bed with O'Neal, and his solemn vow, spoken to the camera: "I will never love anyone like I love Farrah."

Copyright © 2009 ABC News Internet Ventures


***

Please share your thoughts.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009 

Category: News and Politics

4 Dead, 70 Hurt in DC Metro Train Crash




If video fails to play, click here or visit YouTube page at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9MIEIRBpN9Q&feature=channel

***

At Least 6 Dead in Metro Crash On Rail System's Deadliest Day

Red Line Train Rear-Ends 2nd, Injuring Dozens
By Lena H. Sun and Lyndsey Layton
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, June 23, 2009


A Metro train struck another train on the same Red Line track at the height of the evening rush hour yesterday, killing at least six and injuring at least 70 in the deadliest accident in Metrorail's 33-year-history. One of the dead was the operator of the train that rear-ended another stopped in front of it just outside the Fort Totten station in Northeast Washington, Metro officials said.

The impact was so powerful that the trailing train was left atop the first train. Of those injured, at least six were in critical condition. Firefighters had to use heavy rescue equipment to cut open the cars to reach people trapped inside. D.C. Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) said fire officials were going through the trains last night to make sure they had recovered all the bodies.

Metro and rescue officials gave no details about the operator who died or the other fatalities.

The crash occurred just after 5 p.m., and traffic on the trains and highways was severely affected.

Metro, like all transit agencies, is supposed to have numerous safety mechanisms in place to prevent crashes, and it was not clear what caused the accident. The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the accident and has assigned a railroad investigator and two specialists from its office of transportation disaster assistance.
During morning and afternoon rush hours, all trains except longer eight-car trains operate in automatic mode, meaning their movements are controlled by computerized systems and the central Operations Control Center. Both trains in yesterday's crash were six-car trains.

Investigators will probably focus on a failure of Metro's computerized signal system, which is designed to prevent trains from coming close enough to collide, as well as operator error, according to former Metro officials.

The system relies on electronic relays -- about the size of a hardcover book -- aboard trains and buried beside the tracks along each line. When a train gets too close to another train, the system is designed to automatically stop the approaching train. It should work regardless of whether trains are being operated manually or by computer.
Metro has had trouble with its signal system in recent years, and replaced all 20,000 trackside relays in 2000 after discovering that a small portion were failing.

But even if the signal system failed to stop the train, the operator should have intervened and applied emergency brakes, safety experts familiar with Metro's operations say. The position of the second train after the crash -- the fact that its first car came to rest atop the other train -- indicates that the second train was traveling at high speed. In the section of track where the accident occurred, the maximum speed is supposed to be 58 mph. Metro officials would not say how fast the trains were going because of the ongoing NTSB investigation.

There was no maintenance work scheduled in the relatively long, straight and flat section of track between the stations. For many weeks, trains were slowed because of a weakness in the track bed that Metro said it repaired in spring.

This is the third serious Metrorail crash since 1996. The last fatal train crash was in 1996, when a Red Line train overshot the Shady Grove platform on an icy night and plowed into another train. The operator died. In November 2004, a Red Line train rolled backwards down a steep stretch of track and smashed into another train at the Woodley Park station. Twenty people were injured but there were no fatalities.

The deadliest accident in the system's history occurred in 1982, when a six-car Orange Line train bound for New Carrollton derailed near the Smithsonian Station when an improperly aligned switch caused it to enter the wrong track. Three passengers were killed.

In yesterday's accident, both six-car trains were headed toward downtown Washington. The first train stopped because a third train in front had stopped at the Fort Totten platform, said Metro General Manager John B. Catoe Jr. The second train came up behind it and "for reasons we do not know, plowed into that train," Catoe said.
Riders described chaos when the crash occurred. In the train that was struck, passengers said the train had stopped three times in the moments before the crash. After the impact, many passengers had to jump from the side of the train to the ground. Other riders helped lift passengers down safely.

Tom Baker, 47, a District resident, was in the first car of the second train, which rear-ended the first one and landed on top of it. There were eight to 10 passengers in his car. As they pulled out of Takoma on the way to Fort Totten, the female operator said the train was holding because there was a train in front of them. Shortly thereafter, the train started moving again, but within a minute, there was an "enormous crashing jolt," he said.

"You could hear all this crashing and glass breaking," Baker said. "I didn't hear any brakes at all." He said he couldn't gauge how fast the train was moving but said it was traveling at moderate speed. He saw the train lift into the air, he said. "When the dust settled, the entire front of the train was gone," and riders could see down to the train below them.

Garrett Dorsey, 44, of the District was in the train that was rear-ended. The operator said the train had to stop because of some kind of difficulty, and then "there was just a boom like an explosion," he said. Seats flew up.

Ernice Beasley, a District resident with three children, heard about the accident while at work and traveled to the scene by bus. Her daughter Lanice, 14, was on one of the trains.

"She called me and said, 'Mommy, I'm hurt,' " Beasley said. Then the line went dead. No emergency officials could give her any information. Two minutes later, an emergency medical technician told her they were on the way to the hospital with Lanice. She cried again, in joy. "At least I know she's alive."

Fenty said transportation arteries "all along the East Coast will be significantly impacted, probably at least until tomorrow morning."

Catoe expressed condolences to the families of those who lost their lives and to those who were injured. "Our deep, heartfelt pain is with you, and we will do whatever we can to help you through this process," he said. 


***

While I am usually in the area of the accident, I don't ride the train there.  I do drive by there everyday and my commute tomorrow morning is going to be drastically changed because of this sad occasion.

The city is still in shock...this is easily the worst transit/rail accident in the city's history.  I pray that there won't be any more casualties.

Please share your comments if you are inspired by this story.





Thursday, June 18, 2009 

Current mood:  contemplative
Category: News and Politics
Dedicated to Stephen T. Johns




Race: a: a family, tribe, people, or nation belonging to the same stock b: a class or kind of people unified by shared interests, habits, or characteristics (Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary).

Semite: 1 a: a member of any of a number of peoples of ancient southwestern Asia including the Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, and Arabs b: a descendant of these peoples 2: a member of a modern people speaking a Semitic language characteristics (Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary).

Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities, and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racism ).

Antisemitism (also spelled anti-semitism or anti-Semitism; also known as Judeophobia) is a term used to describe prejudice against or hostility towards Jews, often rooted in hatred of their religion, culture, or ethnic background. While the term's etymology might suggest that anti-Semitism is directed against all Semitic peoples, it has been used exclusively to refer to hostility toward Jews since its initial usage (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism).

White supremacy is the belief that white people are superior to people of other racial backgrounds. The term is sometimes used specifically to describe a political ideology that advocates the social and political dominance of whites. White supremacy, as with racial supremacism in general, is rooted in ethnocentrism and a desire for hegemony. It is associated with varying degrees of racism and a desire for racial separation. White supremacy has often resulted in anti-black racism and antisemitism. Different forms of white supremacy have different conceptions of who is considered white, and not all white supremacist organizations agree on who is their greatest enemy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_supremacy).




Guard Stephen T. Johns was shot to death Wednesday inside the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum. Johns' mother, Jacqueline Carter, says she feels like she's stuck in a 'bad nightmare.' Please watch video prior to commenting on this thread. If you have issues playing, click here or visits its YouTube page at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vO0jAKt5fJc

***

I wasn’t going to blog this because I figured everyone else would…but I decided to try something different. Rather than blog my points of view, I invite you to share your thoughts on the above definitions and how they relate (if at all) to the tragic events that unfolded last week at Holocaust Museum—just 5 miles from my home. A black security officer (Stephen T. Johns) died at the hands of an 88-year-old, self-proclaimed white supremacist and anti-Semitic proponent named James von Brunn.

Just in case you don’t know, Washington DC is over 60% black. The general metropolitan area is one of the most diverse ethnically, internationally, racially and spiritually.

Questions:

(1)Are racism and white supremacy the same? (2)What motivates people to think that blacks and Jews are inferior to Christian whites? (3) Do you believe white supremacy is a problem in the USA? (4) Do you believe anti-Semitism is a problem in America? (5) How would react if your friend, father or brother were gunned down by von Brunn? (6) Do you consider the acts of von Brunn to be terrorism? (7) How do we move on from this event?

Everyone is welcome to share her or his thoughts/comments in favor or against this thread. Since this is a sensitive topic, I remind readers and commentators that we can disagree without resorting to name-calling tactics.

Thank you in advance for contributing to this discussion. Feel free to tell your friends.
Sunday, May 31, 2009 

Current mood:Beloved
Category: Romance and Relationships
You were the love for certain of my life…

Subscribe Now

Not a Myspace member, stay alert with RSS, click here.



If video fails to play, click here or visit its YouTube page at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=insjdFCVCTw.

Beloved Wife



by Natalie Merchant (formerly of 10,000 Maniacs)


You were the love
for certain of my life
you were simply my beloved wife
I don't know for certain
how I'll live my life
now alone without my beloved wife
my beloved wife

I can't believe
I've lost the very best of me
you were the love
for certain of my life
you were simply my beloved wife

I don't know for certain
how I'll live my life
now alone without my beloved wife
my beloved wife

I can't believe
I've lost the very best of me

you were the love
for certain of my life
for 50 years simply my beloved wife
with another love I'll never lie again

it's you I can't deny
it's you I can't defy
a depth so deep
into my grief
without my beloved soul
I renounce my life
as my right


now alone without my beloved wife
my beloved wife
my beloved wife
my love is gone she suffered long
in hours of pain

my love is gone
now my suffering begins
my love is gone
would it be wrong if I should
surrender all the joy in my life
go with her tonight?


my love is gone she suffered long
in hours of pain
my love is gone
would it be wrong if I should
just turn my face away from the light
go with her tonight?

***

This blog thread was inspired by everyone who have loved and lost.

Without further ado, here are my blog thread questions: (1) Have you ever loved in the way conveyed in the song above? (2) Who was the subject of your affection? (3) Did she or he loved you with the same passion? (4) Do you still love her or him? (5) When did you know you were in love with this person?

Always everyone is welcome to share her or his comments. Feel free to share this thread with your friends. Remember, those rather elusive Myspace kudos are always welcome.

Subscribe Now.  Click here.

Not a Myspace member, stay alert with RSS, click here.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009 

Current mood:InMemoriam
Category: Blogging
Did I ever tell you that you are my hero?

Subscribe Now

Not a Myspace member, stay alert with RSS, click here



Taken from part one of the first-season episode "The Feminum Mystique," this clip shows Diana's sister, Drusilla, as she transforms into Wonder Girl for the very first time. If video fails to play, click here or visit its YouTube page at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vej3b3LFV8

The great thing about superheroes is that many have secret identities. One minute you are some mild-manner geek from Smallville and the next moment you are leaping tall buildings in a single bound. How cool is that?

If you check out my Myspace homepage, you might notice that I list Ida B. Wells as one of my s/heroes. Why? Well I am happy you ask.


Ida B. Wells-Barnett

July 16, 1862–March 25, 1931



Ida B. Wells was a black woman journalist who documented the unjust crime of lynching that was common in the southern United States (well into the 20th century). Lynching was a terrorist act perpetuated primarily against blacks in order to maintain white supremacy. According to the Archives at Tuskegee Institute, there were nearly 3,500 lynchings of blacks and almost 1,300 of whites between 1882 and 1968. And those are only the recorded cases! The awareness that Ms. Wells brought to this shameful mob-injustice helped to save thousands of lives. In addition to her important work as activist journalist, Ms. Wells-Barnett was a noted leader in the early stages of the Civil Rights movement and an unsung hero in the women’s suffrage movement in the USA.

This blog thread was inspired by one of my Facebook questions I asked last week. This posting is also a dedication of all s/heroes of yesteryear--which is quite fitting for the conclusion of this Memorial Day weekend (in the USA).

Without further ado, here are my "famous" blog thread questions: (1) If you were a “fictional” superhero, who would you be? (2) Who is your real-life superhero? (3) Who is your top s/hero of the past? (4) Can you explain your selections? (5) Do you think you are a s/hero to anyone? (6) If so, who? (7) If not, why?

Always everyone is welcome to share her or his comments. Feel free to share this thread with your friends. Remember, those rather elusive Myspace kudos are always welcome.


Subscribe Now

Not a Myspace member, stay alert with RSS, click here.
Saturday, May 16, 2009 

Current mood:WhiteWashed???
Category: News and Politics
'White African-American' Suing N.J. Med School for Discrimination

Paulo Serodio Says He Was Harassed, Assaulted After Defining Himself as African-American

By SARAH NETTER (May 13, 2009)

race

Can a white guy be African-American?


Paulo Serodio says he is.


Born and raised in Mozambique and now a naturalized U.S. citizen, Serodio, 45, has filed a lawsuit against a New Jersey medical school, claiming he was harassed and ultimately suspended for identifying himself during a class cultural exercise as a "white African-American."


"I wouldn't wish this to my worst enemy," he said. "I'm not exaggerating. This has destroyed my life, my career."


The lawsuit, which asks for Serodio's reinstatement at the school and monetary damages, named the Newark-based University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and several doctors and university employees as defendants.


Filed Monday in U.S. District Court in New Jersey, the lawsuit traces a series of events that Serodio maintains led to his 2007 suspension, starting with a March 2006 cultural exercise in a clinical skills course taught by Dr. Kathy Ann Duncan, where each student was asked to define themselves for a discussion on culture and medicine.

After Serodio labeled himself as a white African-American, another student said she was offended by his comments and that, because of his white skin, was not an African-American.


According to the lawsuit, Serodio was summoned to Duncan's office where he was instructed "never to define himself as an African-American & because it was offensive to others and to people of color for him to do so."


"It's crazy," Serodio's attorney Gregg Zeff told ABCNews.com. "Because that's what he is."


Serodio, who lives in Newark, said he never meant to offend anyone and calling himself African-American doesn't detract from another person's heritage.

Neither the American Civil Liberties Union nor the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People responded to messages seeking comment on the meaning of African-American.


The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines African-American as "an American of African and especially of black African descent."


"There are people of all races who are African," Serodio said, adding that he's never had a problem identifying himself as an African-American until that day in Duncan's class.


Zeff pointed out that Serodio only labeled himself after his instructors asked him to do so and was then penalized for it.


Defending an Identity or Unprofessional Behavior?


Serodio said he is a third-generation African of Portuguese ethnicity whose great-grandfather emigrated to Mozambique. He came to the U.S. in 1984 after being accepted at New York University.


He met his future wife and started a family and, after deciding to settle in the U.S. permanently, got his citizenship in the early 1990s. After doing research work on and off, including for UMDNJ, with pauses in between to be a stay-at-home dad, Serodio said he decided to become a doctor to follow in his parents footsteps.


His plan, he said, was to become a doctor and join Doctors Without Borders where he could travel back to Africa to do charity work like his parents, either as an internist or possibly a neurologist. He started medical school, he said, when his eldest child was in first grade.


The family, he said, had hoped to hold a joint graduation party this spring for his son's passing out of fourth grade and for Serodio's graduation from medical school. But they will only be celebrating his son's achievements this year.


The lawsuit claims Serodio began to be harassed by other students who sought disciplinary action against him for his statement in Duncan's class, but was never given a chance to defend his views against the complaints.


UMDNJ spokesman Jeffrey Tolvin told ABCNews.com that university officials had not yet seen the lawsuit.


"We have no comment on this matter," he said.


In September 2006, Serodio said he again asked to define himself culturally as part of another course exercise. Again, according to the lawsuit he said he was a "white African-American." And again, he was called to the course instructor's office and told never to define himself that way again.


According to the lawsuit, Serodio then wrote an article for the student newspaper, titled "A More Colorful View Than Black and White," in an attempt to explain his self-identification and to call for tolerance at the school.


But when complaints started pouring into Dr. I. Thomas Cohen, then the dean of student affairs, the lawsuit alleges that Serodio was called in again and told by Cohen that if he "lay low for awhile" Cohen would see that a record of the incident would not be placed in Serodio's transcript.


Serodio told ABCNews.com that he believes that America has outgrown the labels of black and white, something he wrote about in the article.


His own children, he said, are of mixed ethnicity European and Chinese. In his own case, he said, "There's a distinction to be made here between ethnicity and being from Africa."


Spiraling Out of Control


The lawsuit claims Serodio tried to stop publication on the newspaper article, but was too late. In response, the professor of the latter cultural class posted a reply on the bulletin boards at the medical school stating that Serodio "had failed to learn professionalism and humanism."


That's when, according to the lawsuit, the harassment, some physical, began in earnest. According to the lawsuit, Serodio's tires were vandalized in December of 2006, other students put up posters slamming him and he was denied protection by the school.


In January 2007, Serodio was made to promise he would never again write in any public forum at the school at the risk of facing disciplinary action, according to the lawsuit.


But Zeff said that the same month, his client was designated as the person who would take notes from a particular class for posting online, as was customary. The notes, Zeff said, contained a few jokes and comments as was typical for students who posted notes online and had been approved by the class professor.


But after a fellow student complained, the same professor that approved the notes filed a complaint about their content, according to the lawsuit, and school officials demanded that Serodio submit to a psychiatric evaluation.


The evaluation was given in April 2007 and Serodio was declared "fit for medical student functions," according to the lawsuit. But after a disciplinary hearing on April 1, which consisted of testimony from anyone claiming to be offended by Serodio's comments, he was notified of his suspension.


The lawsuit claims Serodio was suspended on May 15, 2007 for a period "of not less than one year."


Messages and e-mails left with Duncan and Cohen as well as UMDNJ Dean Dr. Robert Johnson were not returned.


His suspension, which Serodio said was for "unprofessional behavior," meant he was unable to take the board exams reserved for students preparing to enter third year and therefore could not transfer elsewhere to continue his education even though he completed all the second-year coursework.


Resolving the Issue


Serodio told ABCNews.com that he was technically reinstated last spring, but it was too late to start his third year because he still had not been allowed to take his second-year exams.


"I feel unprepared now," he said. "That was very penalizing to me."

So Serodio said he decided to take a year's leave of absence to spend time with his children and get things sorted out with the school, while trying to stay current on his studies for the exam.


The lawsuit is asking for reinstatement to UMDNJ and to the National Board of Medical Examiners so Serodio be allowed to take his board exams. The suit is also asking for recognition that UMDNJ's actions were discriminatory and retaliatory and for unspecified monetary damages.

"I felt this issue had to be resolved," he said.


For now, Serodio is hoping to be able to get his medical degree and put what he considers to be the humiliation of the incident behind him.


"He's lost a part of his career," Zeff said. "He's lost two years of his life."


Copyright © 2009 ABC News Internet Ventures


Source: http://www.abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7567291&page=1


***


( 1 ) Can a “white guy” be considered African-American? (2) How would you define African American? (3) Is it okay for someone to say that she or he is a black Irish American (Greek American, Russian American, European American etc)? (4) Were UMDNJ's actions discriminatory and retaliatory? (5) Would diversity training resolve this issue? Other than being a member of the human race, (6) how would describe your race or ethnicity? (7) Do you feel it is important to celebrate your ethnicity even though you are a resident or citizen of the USA (or the country where you currently make a living)?


Everyone is welcome to leave her or his comments in favor or against this thread. Since this is sensitive issue, I request that everyone be respectful of others opinions. Even more, name calling is the last refuge of the scoundrel. We can all be better than that!


I really look forward to reading your comments. Kudos are welcome.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009 

Current mood:WhyAreYou...?
Category: Romance and Relationships

Why are you Single?  Divorced? In a Gay Union? Married?  Living in Sin?

They've Got Questions:  Do You Have Answers?





I recently was asked by someone here on Myspace why was I single?  My response was that liked the "silence" and "independence" that comes along with being solo.  But I think I could have finally found the right balance for me in terms of a relationship that is fulfilling to me and respectful of my sensibilities...so who knows, I may be officially "hitched" by the next year.  But I am no fortunate-teller.

This week's thread is focused on relationships once more.  My questions: (1) What is your relationship status (i.e., single, partnered, married etc)?  (2) Are you happy with your current status?  (3) How did you get to this point?  (4) Would you do anything differently to improve your relationship(s) or lack of a relationship? (5) How does your family, friends or co-workers feel about your status?  (6) Is there any pressure from those groups to change your relationship(s) or lack of relationship?  (7) How happy are you?

As always, everyone is welcome to share his or her comments.  Keep in mind, this is a safe thread.  Disrespectful comments may be deleted.  People of diverse orientations (i.e., heterosexuals, asexuals, lesbians etc) are always welcome here.

Feel free to send bulletins and/or e-mails to your friends if you think this blog posting may be a relevant conversation in which to participate.  Thanks for your support. Have an amazing week!