Hello, all. I try not to waste your time with needless bulletins, but I feel very strongly about this issue and we can all do something about it. (And time is short)
On Tuesday, April 4, There will be a vote in Jackson County which will have two issues that are important to all of us who live and work in Jackson County.
This is the sample ballot. These are the two stadium tax increases.
I am asking you, if you are a registered Jackson County voter, as a freind, PLEASE PLEASE vote "NO" on April 4 for both of these unfair tax issues. Regardless of how you feel about sports, the Royals, or the Chiefs, these taxes WILL affect your life. If they do not pass, regardless of what the common media sources imply, it DOES NOT mean the teams will leave. It just means that Jackson County residents WILL NOT get screwed (this time...)
I'm not going to waste your time with my own rant, but instead include an excerpt from a more entertaining rant:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What is the deal with the full page ads in the Kansas City Star from the Save Our Stadiums Committee? Who are these guys? They are short on facts and long on innuendo, half-truths, pretty pictures, misleading headlines, and out-and out lies. Let us examine.
First the full pager, top to bottom.
1. "The NEW Truman Sports Complex." Wrong. This is the very same Truman Sports Complex we have now. Same stadiums, same number of seats, same parking lots, same number of bathrooms, same concourses. Look at the illustrations...nothing has changed!
2. "A LEAGUE OF OUR OWN." Wrong. What league would that be? It's still the NFL and MLB, same leagues, same divisions, same dismal perfo rmances from the teams.
3. "Nothing Will Compare!" Wrong. To what? That is superfluous cocktail party talk.
4. "New 25-year leases." Wrong. These are the same 1990 leases, only amended. Many onerous provisions remain. For example: We are called upon to spend $1 Billion on these properties, yet each team will still pay the same $450,000 per year rent. Who is reponsible for that brilliant piece of negotiation? Mike White? Who does he really represent? Certainly not the County if he hasn't got the balls to ask for more rent on my property after improvements like this.
5. "Total Transformation." Wrong. See #1 above.
6. "Rises 245 feet above the new Events PL aza." Huh? What's an Events Plaza? That's the very first time we have heard that phrase. The wording appears nowhere in the leases. Is that simply a fancy name for Parking Lot M? Yes.
7. "Costs Capped." Wrong. Per their lease, the tenant (Chiefs) shall have the right, at any time, to change the scope...revise the program, schematic and final plans and specifications without necessity of Landlord's approval...blah, blah, blah." Section 3.2.4.8, page 11. How can you "CAP" a moving target?
7(a). Same with the Royals. Section 11(d), page 9...last full line of the paragraph. How can you "CAP" a moving target?
8. "Approximately 1/3 of all revenues generated.....will be paid by people who do not l ive in Jackson County. "Poppycock! Hearsay! Prove it!
9. "The economic impact of the Truman Sports Complex exceeds $300 million annually....adding up to nearly $10 billion over the 25-year span of the new leases (NOT NEW LEASES...OLD LEASES!)." Wrong. More pie-in-the-sky blather. $300 million x 25 = $7.5 Billion anyway, not $10 billion...geez, check your math! Economic study after economic study shows that the impact of a professional sports franchise is no greater than that of a medium sized department store. Medium size...not super size. Medium.
10. "Approval of Question 1 will guarantee that the Royals will not abandon Kauffman Stadium.....and the Chiefs will not move to another market...." Wrong. More hot air. The Royals are prime candidates for contraction and.....lest we forget the Balt imore Colts and their middle-of-the-night flight? If these are the sorts of business that would cut and run like that, then we need to consider whether they are the sort of corporate citizens we want.
11. "Save Our Stadiums." Wrong. From what? They are not falling down. Both venues are consistently rated highly for enjoyment of the game experience, whether on the field or in the stands. Players love 'em, fans love 'em, non-fans love 'em, journalists love 'em, media people love 'em. What's not to love?
11(a). The stadiums still look fresh and are extremely serviceable, but like any rental property they need to be maintained. You can place the blame for that not happening on a timely basis squarely on the shoulders of Jackson County. Per the JCSCA, for $60-80 million, we can bring these two facilities up to th e terms of the original 1990 leases...leases that remain in effect...and assure that the teams remain here until 2015.
11(c). Except for the bloviating of Jack Steadman and his "state-of-the-art" kicking and whining (define state-of-the-art for us, willya Jack), neither team has indicated that leaving is an imminent possibility.
How gullible do these people think we are?
Next, the Super Bowl XLIX half-page ad. Stupor Bowl? Stupid Bowl? Super Bowel?
1. "NEW Truman Sports Complex." Wrong. See #1 above.
2. "...biggest one day event on the planet...." Wrong. Unproveable hyperbole.
3. "Corporate Use Tax." On what? How much? Who pays? When does it end (never)? More bait-and-switch diversion.
4. "Tremendous Economic Impact." Wrong. See #9 above. In fact that entire paragraph is chock full of distortions, unproveable assumptions, and lies! Who knows what will happen by 2015?
5. "A League of Our Own." Wrong. Cute movie...lousy premise for this boondoggle.
6. "Kansas City will now be eligible for hundreds of other major events...." Yeah right. With a fabric roof, fabric side curtains, untested lighting, untested climate control, and seamed assembly, Arrowhead will be transformed in to.....a tent! Which of the "other major events" listed would really want to hold their event in a parking lot.....in a tent?
And it goes on and on and on and on.......
The proponents steadfastly refuse to provide information on this issue based on facts. They prefer to use scare tactics and fear-mongering in an attempt to divert attention from the truth of the matter. By any criteria, this issue will not stand on its own feet. It doesn't even pass the smell test.
How sad. How juvenile. How utterly dispicible.
This is and remains a MAJOR LEAGUE RIPOFF!
Question #1: VOTE NO!
Question #2: VOTE NO!