I know why Hillary is still in a race she has no chance of winning.

1. She knows her career is over even in the Senate. There is no way she will win a third term in NY. The Black vote will be completely lost in NY if she runs again. She is still in the race in hopes of forcing herself on the VP spot. If she doesn't get to be VP, then her political career is over. She needs this in order to continue her political career.

2. She is counting on Obama getting assassinated. She thinks that she would get to be President by just waiting a few months. Republicans are already joking about assassination attempts. Now, even Hillary is mentioning the possibility of Obama getting killed. It's like she is banking on it.

Hillary's constant talk about Florida and Michigan reveals just how willing she is to destroy the party over her own selfish pursuits. If Florida and Michigan are allowed to break the rules now, then we will have to allow every other state to break the rules in 2012. We will have to allow every state to make up their own rules during the next election. Hillary knows this. Yet, she is willing to villify the party and Obama now that she knows that she has lost this race. This is NOT about becoming the next President in 2008. This is all about ensuring that she gets the VP spot now or getting Obama to lose so that she can try to run against McCain in 2012 since she will not be able to get reelected in 2012 to represent NY.

Today I saw an ad for Sarah Steelman. She wants to be the next governor of Missouri. In her ad she claims to "protect marriage." So I called her campaign office at 573-635-5385 to ask how is she protecting marriage and what is she protecting it from.

They said that she supported an amendment that defines marriage between someone with a cock and someone with a vagina...or something like that. I said well that doesn't protect marriages. That only restricts marriage to heterosexuals. If you want to protect marriage you should look at gay marriages. Our marriages are constantly being attacked by people who want to deny our religious ceremonies the same amount of legal recognition enjoyed by heterosexual couples. She can't claim to be protecting marriages when she is attacking ours. She is against our marriages. She is the anti-marriage candidate. Why is she claiming to be the protector of marriage when she really all about attacking gay married couples?

He then suggested that I look at Jay Nixon'c website and that I have a nice day before hanging up. Would you please help me get the answer to this simple question? Sarah Steelman's campaign office can be reached at 573-635-5385.

xxoxoxoxoox,
~Eddie

France To Push UN For Decriminalization Of Homosexuality
Source: 365gay. com

(Paris) The French government will press the United Nations to pressure countries to abolish bans on homosexuality the country's minister for human rights has announced.



Homosexuality remains a crime in 75 countries. In many of those countries, including Iran, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Nigeria it is punishable by death. Sentences in other countries range from public floggings to imprisonment.



Human Rights Minister Rama Yade told a meeting of French LGBT rights groups that his government would make its appeal to the UN when France assumes the rotating six-month EU presidency in July.



During that period France will speak for all EU member states at the UN General Assembly.



Yade's commitment came as gays in countries around the world observed International Day Against Homophobia on Saturday.



The International Day Against Homophobia was launched in 2005 and commemorates the date in 1990 when the World Health Organization removed homosexuality from its list of disorders.



Human Rights Watch used IDAHO to launch blistering attacks on Poland and Uganda.



HRW said Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni of Uganda is leading a pogrom against gays. Homosexuality under Museveni's rule is punishable by life imprisonment.



The rights group also accused Polish President Lech Kaczynski of attempting to "deny basic rights" to LGBT people.

Thank goodness for activist judges!!!

California Supreme Court Strikes Down Gay Marriage Ban
Source: 365gay. com

(San Francisco, California) The California Supreme Court ruled Thursday that Prop 22, the voter approved initiative used to block same-sex marriage is unconstitutional.

The court also said that California's domestic partnership law is not a good enough substitute for marriage.

The 4-3 ruling. written by Chief Justice Ron George paves the way for gay and lesbian couples to marry once the ruling is officially published by the court - in about 30 days.

Once that is done same-sex couples in California will be able to obtain civil marriage licenses.

"In contrast to earlier times, our state now recognizes that an individual's capacity to establish a loving and long-term committed relationship with another person and responsibly to care for and raise children does not depend upon the individual's sexual orientation, and, more generally, that an individual's sexual orientation - like a person's race or gender - does not constitute a legitimate basis upon which to deny or withhold legal rights," George wrote for the majority on the mostly Republican appointed court.

The ruling said that churches and other religious institutions will not have to recognize or perform ceremonies for these civil marriages.


The ruling does not extend to federal rights and benefits extended to married couples.

Large crowds began gathering outside the court early Thursday morning.

A wild cheer went up as the ruling was announced, drowning out gasps from opponents of same-sex marriage who also gathered in front of the court.

Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) said that he accepts the ruling of the court.

"Also, as I have said in the past, I will not support an amendment to the constitution that would overturn this state Supreme Court ruling," a statement from the governor said.

"Today the California Supreme Court took a giant leap to ensure that everybody - not just in the state of California, but throughout the country - will have equal treatment under the law," said City Attorney Dennis Herrera, who argued the case for San Francisco.

"As of today, the right to marry is now guaranteed to anyone," said Kate Kendell, executive director of National Center for Lesbian Rights.

The case dates back to 2004 when San Francisco mayor Gavin Newsom began issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Some 8,000 couples exchanged vows before the state Supreme Court ruled Newsom had acted illegally.

The court nullified the marriages but said its ruling dealt only with Newsom's actions. The justices said at the time the question of whether barring same-sex couples from marrying violated the state's equal protection clause of its constitution was a separate matter.

Legal challenges on the constitutional question were begun almost immediately. Three separate suits ultimately were wrapped together into a single case.

In March 2005 a Superior Court judge in San Francisco ruled that the law denying same-sex marriage was unconstitutional.

"It appears that no rational purpose exists for limiting marriage in this state to opposite-sex partners," County Superior Court Judge Richard Kramer said in a written ruling.

In striking down the state ban on same-sex marriage Kramer wrote that the state's historical definition of marriage, by itself, cannot justify the denial of equal protection for gays and lesbians.

Kramer stayed his ruling while the state appealed.

In October, 2006, the California Court of Appeal in a split decision overturned Kramer's ruling and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.

The dissenting opinion to Thursday's ruling was penned by Justice Marvin Baxter.

While he agreed with many arguments of the majority he said that any changes to the state marriage law should be decided by voters.

Thursday's ruling sets the stage for a battle over a proposed constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage that is likely to appear on the November ballot.

A coalition of conservative groups, under the banner 'Protect Marriage' , have submitted more than required 694,354 signatures to qualify. The signatures are being verified.

Last month, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said that if an initiative to ban gay marriage qualifies for the November ballot, he's prepared to fight it.

He made the commitment at a convention of Log Cabin Republicans, the nation's largest gay Republican group.

Schwarzenegger has previously vetoed bills that would have legalized gay marriage. Both times Schwarzenegger said that the courts or the people through a plebiscite should decide the issue.

Vatican: It's OK to believe in aliens
Source: breitbart.com

VATICAN CITY (AP) - The Vatican's chief astronomer says that believing in aliens does not contradict faith in God. The Rev. Jose Gabriel Funes, the Jesuit director of the Vatican Observatory, says that the vastness of the universe means it is possible there could be other forms of life outside Earth, even intelligent ones.

In an interview published Tuesday by Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano, Funes says that such a notion "doesn't contradict our faith" because aliens would still be God's creatures.

The interview was headlined "The extraterrestrial is my brother." Funes said that ruling out the existence of aliens would be like "putting limits" on God's creative freedom.


To Report a UFO Sighting please call the National UFO Reporting Center at 206-722-3000 or contact your local priest.

Unlike John Edwards, BOTH Obama and Clinton agreed to abide by Democratic National Committee rules and not campaign in Florida and Michigan. Yet, now that Hillary no longer has a snowflake chance in Hell of winning the nomination she is making a big stink about counting Michigan and Florida.




Basically, she wants to change the rules, which she agreed to in the begining, in the middle of the game. Suddenly she sees why the Hell Florida and Michigan voters mean so much to her.






KT Tunstall ~ Suddenly I See


Her face is a map of the world
Is a map of the world
You can see she's a beautiful girl
She's a beautiful girl
And everything around her is a silver pool of light
The people who surround her feel the benefit of it
It makes you calm
She holds you captivated in her palm

Suddenly I see (Suddenly I see)
This is what I wanna be
Suddenly I see (Suddenly I see)
Why the hell it means so much to me

I feel like walking the world
Like walking the world
You can hear she's a beautiful girl
She's a beautiful girl
She fills up every corner like she's born in black and white
Makes you feel warmer when you're trying to remember
What you heard
She likes to leave you hanging on her word

Suddenly I see (Suddenly I see)
This is what I wanna be
Suddenly I see (Suddenly I see)
Why the hell it means so much to me

And she's taller than most
And she's looking at me
I can see her eyes looking from a page in a magazine
Oh she makes me feel like I could be a tower
A big strong tower
She got the power to be
The power to give
The power to see

Suddenly I see (Suddenly I see)
This is what I wanna be
Suddenly I see (Suddenly I see)
Why the hell it means so much to me

Last month, Hillary loaned her campaign $6.4 million! Before that it was $5 million. Unlike Obama, who has the support of the people, she has to finance her own campaign.

Isn't this a way of undermining democracy? Every American is allowed to contribute a maximum of $2,300 per election. A primary and general election are regarded as two seperate elections. So the most an individual can throw away on Hillary is $4,600. Yet, Hillary is allowed to "lend" over 11 million dollars to her MI: 2008 campaign. Is she not a citizen? Why is she allowed to contribute millions of dollars to a campaign when the rest of us can only give $4,600.

Multi-millionaires clearly have an extreme advantage over normal candidates. This undermines our democracy. Just for that alone Hillary should be stopped. A vote for Hillary is a vote for cheating and undermining democracy.