Police Brutality 10am Anoka MN-->Father arrested and attacked by Coon Rapids Police Department on Fathers Day for exercising his 1st Amendment rights walking in front of Menards on Main St and Hwy 10.  The Father dressed up in a Captain America outfit with a grocery bag over his head and a sign at the top of a pole about 6 feet tall. 

The father asked the police officers when they approached if he was being detained for which they just proceeded to tackle the Father from behind.  The sign the father was carrying said, "Happy F*%$ing FatherLess Day".  On the other side of the sign it said, "Think Your Family is Safe?  WAKE UP People".  The bag over the Fathers face had two eye holes and a frown face with tears running down it's cheeks.  On the faces forehead was written the word "HELP" and on the back of the bag it read, "911 We Are Under Attack".

The Father wore the bag on his head to protect the identiy of his children just in case they may have seen him and when asked where he was going the Father said he was on his way to the Anoka County courthouse.  He said, he would have driven there but his temporay liscense doesn't allow him to drive on Sunday's.  The Father was arrested for Disorderly Conduct and Obstructing Legal Process for which he plans to challenge. 

The Father was in complete compliance with the police officer's demands the whole time they were arrresting him.  The officer threatened the father that he would be tasered twice and kept accusing the father of resisting arrest even though the Father was not resisting.  The police officer continued to twist on the Father's arm almost to the point of dislocation as the Father kept calming telling the officers to just not hurt him and that he was compling with the officers demands as they kept sayin he wasn't in an attempt for them to twist the situation.  

After the Father was cuffed he then sat in the police car for about an hour with the windows up when it was 90 degrees and 100% humidity.  Another witness showed up at the scence wanting to report the police officers behaviors and the police officer kept accusing the Father of setting them up.  The Father was scared by the brutality as the father was hit so hard from behind that the sign broke and when asked if he still had any pain from the incident, he said, his wrists from the cuffs, his shoulder is still kind sore but said he still had a head ache because the officer clocked him in the back of the head with maybe a night stick when he was being tackled. 

If anyone witness the incident please let me know as we need to hold these officers accountable.

-HD

Legislators hear evidence of judicial corruption and consider solutions. March 13, 2009 Ad Hoc Committee, St. Paul, Minnesota. Rep. Dan Severson chaired. Speakers Greg Wersal, Jill Clark, Nancy Lazaryan and others. Bills for judicial accountability and Articles of Impeachment presented.



..

Legislators hear evidence of judicial corruption and consider solutions. March 13, 2009 Ad Hoc Committee, St. Paul, Minnesota. Rep. Dan Severson chaired. Speakers Greg Wersal, Jill Clark, Nancy Lazaryan and others. Bills for judicial accountability and Articles of Impeachment presented.



..

This is an amazing story of a friend who actually won joint custody of his child in a disputed custody case in Ramsey Co MN.  I know, I am still in awe myself.
My friend and I met at the Minnesota fair a couple year ago when we were protesting outside the main gate with a couple other F4J Dads.  My friend who I didn't know at the time was a selling bottles of water to the crowds as they were entering and leaving the fair and he noticed us on the corner talking with the people and so he came over and was like, what is this family court corruption stuff all about.
I explained the summary version of it to him and his first thought was, are you guys for real and is there really corruption like you say.  After spending a few days working the same corner, he and his girlfriend learned more and more about what we are fighting for and they both became a big supporter of our cause. 
At the time, he had a stable relationship with his girlfriend and they shared a child together.  His famous last words were, this won't ever affect me but I believe in what you guys are fighting for so I will support you.  Over the course of the next year he attended a couple meetings and even helped us with our first fund raiser which he organized mostly by himself.
Then all of a sudden, his girlfriend shacks up with his roomate while he was at work and then started using the courts to try and run away with their child.  My friend knowing the tricks of the courts was able to remain calm and keep good enough records so they couldn't just run rough shot over him.  In the last year he has been arrested for eluding being served, he had to fight off a bogus restraining order and his liscense was even suspended for a while, all of which ended up backfiring on his old girlfriend who is now pregnant with the new boyfriend.  The new boyfriend by the way doesn't work and probably couldn't even keep a job if he needed one.
Looking back at this story, I can't imagine what would have happened to my friend if we hadn't ran into him at the fair and it's stories like this that make those humiliating efforts of standing out in front of the crowds telling the truth that the public doesn't want to hear, all worth it.  He is a good Dad and his son who has specialty needs is going to be better off having his father actively involved in his life.
My friend, even though he was miraculously able to navigate through the courts succesfully in the end, has stated that he will continue to be a big supporter of our cause and plans on continueing to be involved in our Family Law Reform efforts.
While he, nor anyone for that matter, should ever have endure what he and his son went through, this is hopefully the start of the good things to come.  God Bless!  -HD

Instructions for Citizens and Tools for Court Part One: Natural, Common, Ecclesiastical and Civil Law; Law of Nations; Rule of Jurisdiction; Maxims of Law; Constitutions; Citizenship; Statutes.
..

Instructions for Citizens and Tools for Court Part Two: Court Rules; Jury Trial; Equity vs. At Law; Summons and Complaint; Motions; Hearings; Due Process; Notice; Attorney Relationships; Objections; Appeals.
..

Instructions for Citizens and Tools for Court Part Three: Sixteen Ways to Break a Person; Questions and Answers.
..

Tim Kinley & Nancy Lazaryan on "Speechless" Feb 27, 2009; Ad Hoc Committee to meet Mar 13, 2009

..

I am offended by the word deadbeat to the N'th degree.  City Pages may as well say something like the church is acting like a black father.  When you allow pointed discrimination, you have unintended consequences.  It's all wrong! 
In regards to the court case in their story, a parent should only have to reimburse what his fellow citizens, the state, is willing to pay and if you can't afford that then that's where the income percentages come into play.  The otherway around gives the states to much of an incentive to go after the profits and destroy our families and marriages. 

In this case, the courts are riding roughshot over this family and have overstepped it's boundaries into not just their private family affairs but have also intruded into all of our family affairs unnecessarily and believe it or not, the state is knowingly doing it just for their enforcement profits.  If this story reads anything like the court record, it's all unnecessary because all this information is irrelevant to the equity issues at stake and the courts have made it more complicated than it should have ever been. Gesh!

If I were a betting man I'd be willing to bet if the mom and the courts were a little more realistic and not so arrogant in their demands and allowed for the rebuttable presumption that the state statutes might be in violation of due process, these supposed mutual agreements rendered from the court of equity wouldn't be so hard for the Family Courts to enforce. Huh, go figure? To me this isn't rocket science, the whole system is broke and sooner or later someone has got to pull out the common sense card. The state statutes are only presumed to be constitutional and the people should be allowed to question them with the judiciaries help instead of being blocked. 

One more thing, if the state is so sure of their procedureal rights, why then doesn't the state allow this man to have a jury?  -HD

Here's the link to it:
http://www.mncourts.gov/Documents/0/Public/NewsPostings/MN_Joint_Physical_Child_Custody_Presumption_Study_Group_Report_2009_DSprint.pdf
At least this parts over and they didn't say, Ya, state you can continue to do this or give the state any more legal advice other than what wasn't concluded, defended or stated by the judiciary. For starters, they didn't conclude that a presumption isn't already assumed in a non-voidable law and kept reiterating there is already a minimum 25% rebuttable presumption. Still digesting but take a look so we can testify against it at the legislature. -HD

News Release: www.RKids.org

Ridiculous! Here in the United States?
Everyday hundreds if not thousands of Citizens lose their secured right to liberty and are denied their right to trial by jury before their liberty is removed or restricted.
How can that be? How can a person's liberties be removed without a jury trial?
Don't we have a constitution that guarantees a person's liberty will not be taken unless a jury decides the person guilty?

Apparently the legislature and judges in Minnesota have failed to read and abide by the state and federal constitutions, as these "public servants" have created, maintained and continue to enforce an unconstitutional prison known as "Family Law".

The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that parental rights are "perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by this court." But, once a person enters the quagmire of "Family Law" all liberty rights also known as parental rights, are stripped from the Citizen.

Children are repeatedly and consistently removed from their parent(s) without a jury trial. Parents are GUILTY first and then must prove their innocence. Perjury is rampant and totally accepted by the judges.

R-Kids of Minnesota has valiantly fought with other Citizen groups to expose the wholesale elimination of liberty within the prison known as "Family Law".

In their efforts they have petitioned the legislature to repeal unconstitutional "Family Law" statutes. Instead of responding and acting upon the demands of the People to cease the violations of our liberties, the Minnesota legislature formed a "special study group" to evaluate the impact of "Joint Physical Custody" in divorce cases.

For this "special study group" to evaluate the impact of "Joint Physical Custody", the group will have to first proclaim that parents have NO parental rights. The group would have to determine that the children all belong to the state and the parents have never "had" Joint Physical Custody prior to their separation.

Every parent that enters the courtroom already HAS "Joint Physical Custody" of his/her child(ren). The status (relationship) between the parent and the child does not change merely because the parents are separating. The United States Supreme Court cases that declare our rights to parent as constitutionally secured as LIBERTY means that ONLY a jury can remove our right to fully parent our children.

The corrupt system in Minnesota, which created a multi-billion dollar industry that feeds off the destruction of the family, has commissioned a study to justify the violations of our liberty. Ninety percent of the members of the study group all benefit from the lawless removal of children from their parents. On Sept 22nd, Oct 27th, Nov 24th, and Dec 15th, 2008 Mondays (1:30 to 4pm)--Judicial Center St Paul 25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King--Room G06 this "special study group" will convene.

R-Kids is inviting any true Citizens remaining in the state to attend, have your voice heard and stand shoulder to shoulder as we fight for our secured right to liberty.