|
|
|
Tuesday, October 14, 2008
 |
From the Wikipedia page: Proposition 2, the proposed Standards for Confining Farm Animals initiative statute, is a California ballot proposition in that state's general election on November 4, 2008. The proposition would add a chapter to Division 20 of the California Health and Safety Code to prohibit the confinement of certain farm animals in a manner that does not allow them to turn around freely, lie down, stand up, and fully extend their limbs. The measure would deal with three types of confinement: veal crates, battery cages, and sow gestation crates. If approved by the voters, the statute would become operative on January 1, 2015. Farming operations would have until that date to implement the new space requirements for their animals, and the measure would prevent animals in California from being confined in these ways in the future. Ballot Label summary The California Secretary of State's summary from the Official Voter Information Guide[1] of Proposition 2 is as follows: - Requires that calves raised for veal, egg-laying hens and pregnant pigs be confined only in ways that allow these animals to lie down, stand up, fully extend their limbs and turn around freely.
- Exceptions made for transportation, rodeos, fairs, 4-H programs, lawful slaughter, research and veterinary purposes.
- Provides misdemeanor penalties, including a fine not to exceed $1,000 and/or imprisonment in jail for up to 180 days.
Now what does this mean for us? It means that not only are we one step closer to ridding the world of factory farm, but we are showing the world what we stand for: CRUELTY TO ANIMALS IS WRONG! The cute video: The not so cute video: The downsides? Besides an increase in cost in eggs, which everything is going up in cost anyway... (and I think we're a little spoiled on how little eggs cost ANYWAY!), so far all I can see is excuses from factory farmers who will be making less money... What do you guys think? Please feel free to post comments discussing this. I'd like to know the downsides to supporting this, besides "eggs will cost more". Also, thank you, everyone for the birthday wishes! TTAP is now 2 years old!
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, December 17, 2007
 |
Current mood:  irritated
Category: Pets and Animals
Lately, I've been getting a lot of flack for saying that PeTA supports "happy meat" or meat that is raised humanely. I support this stance of PeTA's, albeit not a very known one. You see, PeTA flip flops on it's stances on meat. It tells people that veganism is the ONLY way to go, but praises big meat and fast food for choosing more humane living situations. I realize that not everyone will go vegan, or even veggie. Some people can't do it, can't do it right, or just refuse to give up meat. So my advice to them is: buy non factory farmed meat, eggs, and dairy. Some good sites for you to consider: www.eatwellguide.org www.eatwild.com www.localharvest.com Now, does PeTA support happy meat? Hm... let see. Yes: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17844064/ And does PeTA give awards to people who build slaughter houses? Hm... lets see. Yes: http://www.abolitionist-online.com/ Why happy meat? Dying is painful and unpleasant, period. Dying from old age, bleeding out, from giving birth, from disease, etc is all painful and unpleasant. I doubt many deaths are painless (regardless of whether or not we cause it), save for a shot to the head or dying in their sleep. At least the animals in a non factory farmed setting lived a full life before continuing the food chain. "Aren't we keeping them from their full lives?" Well, considering most of the animals we use as livestock aren't hunters, they don't need to roam or hunt. Most graze or just walk/lie around. Pigs, chicken, cows, etc. These animals ARE living their full lives. They just have to stay within a fenced area, and I'm speaking of local/family farms, not factory farms. In NO WAY am I supporting factory farms, and if you've read this far and think that I do, please read it again. To the vegans who think they don't support any death, you are being hypocritical. Unless you farm your own vegetables or know the people you buy your veggies from, you contribute to the deaths of millions of animals caught in combines, pesticides to keep "pests" away, and countless deaths in processing machinery. Many farmers have control hunts to keep down the deer population from eating YOUR grains, beans, etc. Unless you don't drive a car, you make your own clothes (with cotton you made yourself), make your own home products (soap, brushes, etc), I don't want to hear it. Do you have ANYTHING in your house with plastic on it? Well, some plastic was/is made from animals. You're not doing all you can to stop all the animal suffering, so stop being so high and mighty for being vegan, or when people eat happy meat.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
 |
Current mood:  gloomy
From: www.dogpolitics.com I couldn't say it better myself. :)
Are You Funding The Dog Holocaust?
Dog lovers - Are you supporting breed-specific legislation?
Are you facilitating the killing of innocent dogs? Are you helping to fund the dog holocaust?
 Spencer
If you donate to PETA or HSUS - the answer is YES.
And if you didn't already know that PETA & HSUS support and fund breed-specific legislation, blatent discrimination against the owners of targeted breeds and contribute to the worldwide Dog Holocaust .......
you do now.
So, dog lovers - consider this your OFFICIAL NOTICE:
* If you donate to PETA - or send money to HSUS - you are funding breed-specific legislation. * If you donate to PETA - or send money to HSUS - you are funding the killing of innocent dogs. * If you donate to PETA - or send money to HSUS - you are fundingthe worldwide Dog Holocaust.
That's why I insist - no I demand - that anyone who gives PETA or HSUS money or support or any credence - just stop.
PETA Urges Pitbull Ban
PETA is beyond despicable in their support of breed bans. From their most recent press release:
"PETA sent an urgent letter to Dorchester County Council Chair Larry Hargett and other council members urging them to follow the lead of dozens of other jurisdictions across the country by banning or strictly regulating pit bull ownership."
HSUS Calls For Mandatory Sterilization Of Pitbulls
The HSUS has two faces and two tongues - while they tell the public they oppose breed bans - they actually write letters to city councils supporting breed bans.
Pam Rogers, Legislative Coordinator for HSUS called for the mandatory sterilzation of all pitbulls in a letter the Louisville Metro Council, Download Louisvillemulti-topicfinalletter.doc,
"because pit bulls currently flood animal shelters in Louisville and across the country, legislation requiring their mandatory sterilization could be a benefit to the breed and to all dogs in the community. Additionally, the mandatory sterilization of pit bulls would negatively impact those individuals who use pit bulls for fighting, guarding locations used for illegal activities, and the backyard breeders who so recklessly add to the dog overpopulation. Requiring the sterilization of pit bulls does not have the same problems as traditional breed-specific legislation".
HSUS goes on to justify breed-specific legislation by saying,
"There is no doubt that pit bulls are in bad shape in America right now. They are likely the most popular dog in the country, but unfortunately, they are also the dogs of choice for drug dealers, gang members, and anyone else who is looking for a dog to be a status symbol".
HSUS Smears Pitbull Owners
This very deliberate smear campaign by HSUS against pitbulls and pitbull owners is executed by consistently using the media - and very specific language - to characterize owners as criminals, drug dealers.
Over and over - in almost any news article in which HSUS is interviewed with regard to pitbulls - we see language from HSUS that criminalizes pitbull owners - such as this article from the St. Petersbugh Times:
"Adam Goldfarb, an issues specialist with the Humane Society of the United States. "My personal opinion is they are the most popular dog in the history of the United States," he said. "They are the dog of choice for drug dealers, gang members and anyone else who wants a tough-looking dog."
Friends Don't Let Friends Support BSL
If you are in the fight to stop breed discrimination and stop the spread of hideous, evil, dog-killing legislation - there is no way that anyone can support either of these organizations.
Many dog lovers are shocked at PETA's pro-breed ban postion, or unaware of HSUS' efforts to backdoor breed-specific legislation, and shake their heads in disbelief.
What is very clear is that PETA and HSUS have betrayed innocent dogs, and betrayed the very people who own targeted breeds.
PETA & HSUS betray their donors - people who give them money under the assumption they are fighting breed-specific legislation.
BSL is a dealbreaker - a betrayal to anyone who owns a dog.
Stop funding the war on dogs, stop funding the Dog Holocaust.
Stop funding PETA & HSUS. Kiss BSL goodbye and say Bye, bye, PETA and kiss off, HSUS.
Friends Don't Let Friends Support BSL
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, October 22, 2007
 |
Current mood:  productive
First off, I’m not entirely anti-PeTA. PeTA has some good views, like eradicating factory farms, getting our pet population down, and stoping animal abuse. I would have to say that I don’t support PeTA for the most part, though. Their view on Pits Bulls is misguided, and their venture to eradicate the entire breed because some dogs are trained to be violent and blame those horrendous acts the humans force on them on an entire breed is downright idiotic. Punish the deed, not the breed.
Their other views on companion animals/pets and the eradication of them is silly as well. I feel as if we have a special bond with our animals, and I feel the world benefits by our relationships with them. Yes, we have an overpopulation problem. No, spaying and neutering out of existance is NOT the answer. We need education, and spaying and neutering. Not wiping them out. My view on their euthenasia policy. (EDIT) I’m a veggie, but I don’t believe that meat eating is wrong. Wiping it out for all humans isn’t the answer. Many people can’t live healthy lives being veggie, and a completely veggie world could mess our ecosystem up. Again, education is the answer to all of these problems! I don’t tell people not to support PeTA, but I don’t support them financially and I ask people to support other animal right/welfare groups instead. Some times PeTA has good ideas and good petitions/movements. The point of this site is NOT to push you to hate PeTA. I have many friends who do, and thats fine. The point of this site is to educate you to know what you’re supporting. You can support PeTA in some of their ventures, but supporting them financially is donating money to causes that you don’t want to support. You don’t have to agree with me completely on my view on vegetarianism, or animal rights/welfare, but feel free to use information on my site, even if you don’t want to add me. If you ever have questions, please contact me for more info. Note: This will be updated at a later time when I remember more things. Sometime I just forget until people send me messages and post comments.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, August 03, 2007
 |
Current mood:  cold
Category: Pets and Animals
PeTA literally kills over 70% of the animals they take in each year. In 2004, it was over a whopping 86%, and in 2005 it was OVER 90%! Most kill shelters manage to stay under 70% with only 1% of the money PeTA manages to take in. I know the shelter I work at doesn't make that much. EDIT: NEW GRAPH
"But aren't all animals sick or injured?"No. From PeTA: "Since we're not set up as a traditional shelter, most of the animals we receive are so physically and/or psychologically abused that euthanasia is definitely the most compassionate choice." HOLY CRAP. What constitutes physically and/or psychologically abused?! Whatever PeTA determines as too far gone? So literally, any animal that comes in is dead? What determines "physically abused" beyond rehab? We have had cats burned by fire, who after healing for about 2-3 months, become adoptable again! Some of the cats we get in the shelter I work at are flailing, hissing, angry little things. But after a few days of calming down in their crates, with food, water, and a litter box, with a little human interaction, they become lovebugs! Of course, some are feral, or unrehabitable, but thats to be expected. I'm sure PeTA looks at these angry animals and doesn't see healthy adoptable pets who are scared. They see a suffering soul, who needs to be put down. I'm sorry, but PeTA spends a majority of it's money on advertising. If it took maybe 5% to take care of the animals it gets in, it would take a LOT less heat from anti-PeTA supporters, and attract a LOT more followers. But NO. They aren't a " traditional shelter". THEN DON'T TAKE ANIMALS IN!!!So, literally, PeTA workers can look at any cat, and think "This cat looks sad. We need to end it's suffering." or "This cat is bleeding, lets put it out of it's misery." What kind of animal saving organization is this?
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, July 21, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
Edit: Haha, it's only a joke. Anyway, Vick was indicted, and if you want to see the see the actual indictment, click here.
And as for people okay with Pit Bull/ dog fighting, I'd like to say that it's NOT okay to risk anothers life for your entertainment. Pit Bulls are wonderful dogs! Stop fighting them, stop breeding them, and adopt! I can't stress this enough!
Read up on the latest about Micheal Vick from the links below, and if you're interested, sign this petition Give Michael Vick the maximum sentence for dogfighting! (if he's guilty, of course!)
----------
espn.com
What do these federal charges mean for Vick?
Vick is in real trouble. He is up against the might and majesty of the U.S. government with all of its agents, all of its investigative techniques and all of its skilled prosecutors. If he has any doubts about the power and skill of the forces arrayed against him, he can call Scooter Libby, former chief of staff to vice president Dick Cheney, or he can call Lord Conrad Black, the disgraced media mogul facing time in a federal penitentiary. If he still isn't convinced, he can call Jeff Skilling, the zillionaire former Enron CEO who is residing in a federal pen. All three of them hired brilliant (and expensive) lawyers. All three thought they could explain their way out from under federal charges. And all three were convicted. Vick can, and probably will, hire some of America's best defense lawyers, but they will face a serious battle.
---------
sports.yahoo.com
A statement released by Nike Inc. said the company "is concerned by the serious and highly disturbing allegations made against Michael Vick, and we consider any cruelty to animals inhumane and abhorrent. We do believe that Michael Vick should be afforded the same due process as any citizen; therefore, we have not terminated our relationship."
--------
Peta and Micheal Vick
Here's what PETA President Ingrid Newkirk had to say about the NFL's "wait and see" attitude in a statement to the media yesterday:
"Forget that unless space aliens were on Vick's property putting up an invisibility shield, it is impossible that Vick didn't know (let alone sponsor a fighting dog), that the house he built included designs for dog training facilities and that his relatives were fighting, kenneling, training, housing training equipment, and killing dogs there. There was a time when people under fire for corruption let alone criminal cruelty, resigned. That honorable moment has passed because of the Almighty Dollar. If he won't do the right thing by stepping down until this is resolved (and I'll put a sporting bet on his conviction), the NFL should suspend him. Is the new America only about money or do we still cling to some values? In the courts he may be innocent until proven guilty, and that's fair and fine, but in professional or political life, we have to have a higher standard than "hey, keep raking it in until we see if he gets off."
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, April 19, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
Ok, I've seen Matthew Lush, the Gay God, online spouting that ketchup isn't vegetarian. He's also a large supporter of PeTA2
He says that it has natural flavorings:The exact definition of natural flavorings & flavors from Title 21, Section 101, part 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations is as follows:
"The term natural flavor or natural flavoring means the essential oil, oleoresin, essence or extractive, protein hydrolysate, distillate, or any product of roasting, heating or enzymolysis, which contains the flavoring constituents derived from a spice, fruit or fruit juice, vegetable or vegetable juice, edible yeast, herb, bark, bud, root, leaf or similar plant material, meat, seafood, poultry, eggs, dairy products, or fermentation products thereof, whose significant function in food is flavoring rather than nutritional."
Here is a GREAT rebuttal. Short, simple sweet.
"On behalf of H.J. Heinz, please be assured, Heinz Ketchup does not contain animal products, and never has. Natural flavoring refers to herbs and spices that are derived solely from plant sources. In fact, the FDA has set a standard of identity for ketchup that does not permit the use of animal products. Deviation from this standard of identity would mean that the product could not be called ketchup. For further questions, please call us at 800-255-5750. -- Karen White, Heinz North America"
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, March 26, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
UPDATE! PeTA2 removed the blog about famous meat eaters, and I can't find any record of this post anywhere on the PeTA2 site. If anyone can show me where they can find it, I'd like to link to it. I'll keep my original blog like it is, so people can see I haven't altered it. I'd say that this is a success in the name of thetruthaboutpeta!
ORIGINAL POST:
This is in response to this, where PeTA2 claims that eating meat is bad, and therefore, makes you CRAZY. You all know I'm a vegetarian, but I'm sorry, this is going TOO far.
So, lets look at all the EVIL meat eaters, shall we?
Benito Mussolini, Italian dictator Charles Manson, infamous murderer David Duke, founder of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Jim Jones, Kool-Aid drinking cult leader Osama Bin Laden, terrorist leader
You're right, none of these people would win a Nobel Peace Prize, and it MUST be because they ate/eat meat, right? No, it's because of their lives, beliefs, and upbringing. I'll admit, people who condone killing wouldn't have a problem killing and/or eating meat, but thats like saying all bad people have been exposed to dogs, so kill all the dogs. Yeah, that's probably true, but it's kind of unrelated.
So, to counter, let me show you some GOOD meat eaters:
 Although Martin Luther King Jrs wife, Coretta Scott King was a veggie, MLK Jr was NOT.
MEAT EATER
 Winston Churchill, led Britian during World War II, and is thought to be a great man and thinker.
MEAT EATER
 Aristotle wrote on diverse subjects, including physics, metaphysics, poetry (including theater), biology and zoology, logic, rhetoric, politics, government, and ethics.
MEAT EATER
 Jesus, asking for fish and loaves. Is that enough evidence to prove he ate meat, PeTA?
MEAT EATER
Now, to move on, how about some EVIL vegetarians?
 Volkert van der Graaf's extra-legal activities as an animal rights activist include at least two murders.
VEGGIE
 Lynette "Squeaky" Fromme, one of Charles Mansons girls, was a veggie. Although she never killed anyone, she tried twice.VEGGIE
Maybe Charlie Manson isn't a vegetarian, I can't find any hard proof that he is or isn't, but I DID find that he IS an Animal Rights Activist. "There is no comprimise to saving ATWA, ATWA is a holy war." [ATWA = Air, Trees, Water, Animals] I love how they FAILED to mention he's an Animal Rights Activist, just like they are.
By the way, rumor has it that Hitler was an Animal Rights Activist/vegetarian too.
Oh, and lets not forget PeTA praising Timothy McVeigh, the OKC bomber, for choosing a vegan last meal. Here, they ask him to choose a vegan last meal. So, it's cool that he killed people, but not kill animals? Here is McVeighs response: "You gotta remember," McVeigh writes in the letter obtained by the Post, "this is meat-eatin' farm country; still, good job getting the attention to your cause (like protesting dead rats on 'Survivor') ... Truth is, I understand your cause -- I've seen slaughterhouses myself -- but I still believe in reasonable taking and eating of game (as an outdoorsman and hunter) ... My one main problem with the veg movements is this (besides the fact that I'm a libertarian): Where do you draw the line, and what standard is used to define that line? ... What about grubs/worms/etc.? (that chick on 'Survivor 2'). And finally, plants are alive, too: they react to stimuli (including 'pain'); have circulatory systems, etc.; so how about them? I cannot sustain a prolonged intellectual debate on the subject as my time is short, but I'd suggest hitting Ted Kaczynski up for his opinions on the subject."
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, March 05, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
Don't know if PeTA corp. made these, but I don't think they would disapprove. I honestly think these are to be aimed at our youth, especially our teenage boys. 


Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, February 04, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
Ok, I've had QUITE enough. I've seen this video all over myspace, and I can tell you that it's NOT REAL. Yes, that is a cow. No it is NOT alive. A few reasons: 1. There is no blood. If you're lucky, you've never seen something killed in front of you, but if you're like me, you've seen an animal killed. If that was a live cow, blood would be flying EVERYWHERE. In order to use an animal for food, it needs to be bled. If not, it's DISGUSTING (even more so than regular! :P), and hard to use for consumption. Usually, this entails holding the animal upside down by it's feet, and slitting it's throat. Yes, I understand that's incredibly horrible sounding, but it's whats needed to kill the animal. Even if it isn't supposed to be for consumption, you would STILL need to bleed it out, because wet blood is hard to burn, so it makes sense to bleed it. 2. There is no movement. You can't tell me that if you were caught in a grinder, you wouldn't be trying to move? Not even your head? Come on, now. Any animal that's conscious is going to try and run, and all PeTA members should know this; especially after seeing all your videos of factory farms, you should know that animals run, or at least try, even with broken legs. 3.The sound is silly. I'm sorry, but I've talked to someone from the department of Agriculture, who has seen this type of machinery used, and they've said a few things about the sounds of this video. "The thing that I am certain of is the amount of noise that the machinery makes. Here are the reasons why, regardless of the manufacturer: 1)it is made entirely of metal and those parts rub/grind up against each other, if they did not make contact with each other the machine would not grind effectively , 2)it runs on a gas or diesel fuel engine that makes noise while in operation including the exhaust (think of being near a bulldozer or large tractor in operation). It is possible that there are electric models, but I have never seen or heard of one. Even if it ran on an electric motor which would be quieter (the engine only, nothing else would sound different), you would not be able to hear the cow above the grinder." Therefore, the video wouldn't ONLY pick up the sounds of a cow, so those are dubbed in. 4. "Well what if the cow was just unconscious/drugged?" First off, thats a large waste of money. Using drugs to make it go unconscious, and then grinding it up whole? If I were running a slaughter house, I'd slit the throat first to prevent movement, and I would use that machine for: a. grinding up cow that died before slaughter , and not fit for consumption, or b.grinding up diseased cows, both for better incineration. In other words, the cow is NOT ALIVE. And even if it WAS alive and sedated, it's not feeling anything, so the part about it being painful goes right out the window. This video may or may not be from PeTA (although it does say peta2 in the browser), but I've seen a lot of animal rights activists trying to push this as real.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, February 03, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
It's over everyone.... The jury threw the case away, and only gave the two PeTA employees a slap on the wrist: suspended 10-day jail sentences, 12 months' probation, 50 hours of community service, a $1,000 fine, and almost $3,000 in restitution for "improper disposal of their furry victims' bodies" (or littering!). Oh and the van in which all of this took place was taken as well. Oh well. Thats the way the jury crumbles.. I don't like using this site, but it's got a lot of signatures already: Sign the petition to have PETA's tax-exemption status removed!
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, January 18, 2007
 |
Category: Pets and Animals
If so, I've got a GREAT site for you! American Temperament Test Society, Inc. (ATTS) ATTS was established to: - Provide for a uniform national program of temperament testing of purebred and spayed/neutered mixed-breed dogs.
- Conduct seminars to disseminate information to dog owners, dog breeders and evaluators (testers) concerning dog psychology, motivation, reaction and other aspects of temperament testing.
- Recognize and award certificates to dogs that pass the requirements of the temperament evaluation.
- Work for the betterment of all breeds of dogs.
- Select, train, prepare and register temperament evaluators.
It's not the most beautiful site, but it's awesome! Upcoming tests. FAQ
Now, if you don't live anywhere near where the tests are being held, here is another cool place: Canine Good Citizen The Canine Good Citizen (CGC) program, established in 1989, is an American Kennel Club program to promote responsible dog ownership and to encourage the training of well-mannered dogs. - Accepting a friendly stranger.
- Sitting politely for petting.
- Allowing basic grooming procedures.
- Walking on a loose lead.
- Walking through a crowd.
- Sitting and lying down on command and staying in place.
- Coming when called.
- Reacting appropriately to another dog.
- Reacting appropriately to distractions.
- Calmly enduring supervised separation from the owner.
If all ten objectives are met, the handler can apply for a certificate and special dog tag from the AKC stating that the dog has earned the CGC. Dogs do not have to be registered with the AKC to earn a CGC, nor do they have to be purebred or, in fact, registered with any canine organization. The goal is to promote good citizenship for all dogs. NEW LINK:
Therapy Dogs International What are the requirements for joining TDI?
To belong to Therapy Dogs International, Inc., all dogs must be tested and evaluated by a Certified TDI Evaluator. A dog must be a minimum of one (1) year of age and have a sound temperament. Each dog must pass the American Kennel Club's Canine Good Citizen Test (CGC), and a temperament evaluation for suitability to become a Therapy Dog. The test will also include the evaluation of the dog's behavior around people with the use of some type of service equipment (wheelchairs, crutches, etc.). Thanks for the link, guys!
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, January 14, 2007
 |
Ok, doing some snooping around, I found some more info on the PeTA death van scandal, here.
PeTA Trial Begins November 13
The accused: Andrew Benjamin Cook of Virginia Beach, Va. and Adria Joy Hinkle of Norfolk, Va.

The PeTA workers were arrested on June 15, 2005. Allegedly, they euthanized 31 animals (dogs and cats) and dumped the dead bodies into a waste container located behind an Ahoskie grocery store.
Dr. Pat Proctor, owner of AAH, said he contacted PeTA in regards to picking-up the animals. Hinkle and Cook came to his business on June 15 and picked-up the animals, promising to find them good homes. However, the cat and her two kittens, all judged by Proctor as in good health and adoptable, were among the 31 dead animals linked to Hinkle's and Cook's possession on the day of their arrest.

Hinkle and Cook were arrested by the police late in the afternoon of June 15. When, on a stake-out, they observed a white van in which the two were operating stop in an area located behind Piggly Wiggly in Ahoskie's Newmarket Shopping Center and toss several black bags in a commercial dumpster, a traffic stop was initiated on the van - a vehicle registered to PeTA.
The bags located in the dumpster contained 18 dead dogs, including one bag containing seven puppies. An additional 13 dead animals, including the mother cat and her two kittens, were found in the van.
Twenty-two of the animals discovered on June 15 were collected the same day by Hinkle and Cook.
An autopsy performed later on one of those dogs revealed the animal was in good health prior to its death.
(I stole bits and pieces of a story online. THIS STORY, FOUND HERE.)
PeTA digital camera found, may lead to incrimination.
Ahoskie Police Chief Troy Fitzhugh reported that a warrant had been executed to retrieve the images recorded on a digital camera allegedly used by the two PeTA workers.
"The photos will be used as evidence during the course of the ongoing investigation," Fitzhugh said.
"All we do know and can release to the media at this time are the following facts in the case," Fitzhugh said. "(1) These animals were alive when they were picked up on June 15 from the Bertie County Animal Shelter. (2) The incident involving the dumping of these animals occurred at 5 p.m. on Wednesday afternoon, June 15. There have been some reports I've seen that said this incident occurred at night. (3) We do know at the time of the arrest that a female was operating the van and a male was a passenger."
PeTA has suspended Hinkle in lieu of their investigation. Cook remains actively employed with the Norfolk, Va. based organization.
(I stole bits and pieces of a story online. THIS STORY, FOUND HERE.)
Similar cases found.
Hearing date for employees of PeTA reset for Aug. 16
Drugs used to kill animals, shown to be used by PeTA employees.
"We have received confirmation from the SBI Crime Lab the drugs contained in the tackle box were Ketamine and Pentobarbital," Roberts said.
Dr. Cheryl Powell of the Powellsville Pet Clinic, who is a licensed veterinarian, said Ketamine is primarily used as aesthetic drug that is used to sedate animals.
"You would have to get carried away with that drug to kill," Dr. Powell said.
She said the Pentobarbital was the sedative given to animals to euthanize them.
(I stole bits and pieces of a story online. THIS STORY, FOUND HERE.)
Also, aids patients against PeTA.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, January 14, 2007
 |
(THIS BLOG IS A PERSONAL ARTICLE WRITTEN BY THETRUTHABOUTPETA)
You're a vegatarian or vegan (aka the complete vegetarian), now what?
One of the main reasons I started this site, is so people who were touched by PeTAs words on how animals were being treated and are now either vegetarian or vegan, can now know what PeTA really stands for.
You've seen the videos, of turkeys being thrown, baby male chicks in dumpsters, calfs in cages, animal testing, and skinning animals while they're still alive. They moved you... made you want to stop eating meat. Made you want to stand up and DO something!
Why this injustice to all these living animals? Why do they have to die, let alone in such a horrible manner?
Now, you belong to one of the largest animal rights groups in the world. They educated you, and told you they want to save animals. You listened and watched and understood... but did you really understand?
Some of the things that PeTA stands for, I can sympathize with. Lets save the animals! But did you know, that PeTA doesn't WANT to save them, like you and I do? They want "total animal liberation." Sounds good, huh? It's not what you think.
In PeTAs world there are NO: pets, seeing eye dogs, farms, ranches, horseback riding, zoos.
Thats right! All the animals that you have had throughout your childhood, who helped you grow and become the person you are, SHOULDN'T exist in PeTAs world. Just the thought of not growing up with my cats... my dogs.. my snake... my hamsters... my ferrets.... all my animals who had loving and nurturing homes, makes me sick to my stomach. I wouldn't be the same person I am now without them, and I know you wouldn't either.
Just imagine growing up without the pets you had! Can you imagine them not being there? PeTA believes that having pets is animal enslavement. See here:
"As John Bryant has written in his book Fettered Kingdoms, they [pets] are like slaves, even if well-kept slaves." -PETA's Statement on Companion Animals
Ingrid, as well as many PeTA supporters believe that domesticated animals shouldn't exist:
"The cat, like the dog, must disappear..... We should cut the domestic cat free from our dominance by neutering, neutering, and more neutering, until our pathetic version of the cat ceases to exist." -John Bryant, Fettered Kingdoms: An Examination of a Changing Ethic, PETA 1982, p.15.
PeTA and it's supporters even has the GALL to compare the lives of animals to the lives of humans:
"Human beings, as a species, have no more value than slugs." -- John Davis, editor of Earth First! Journal
"What we must do is start viewing every cow, pig, chicken, monkey, rabbit, mouse, and pigeon as our family members." ---Gary Yourofsky, Humane Education Director, PETA, The Toledo Blade, June 24, 2001
"The life of an ant and the life of my child should be accorded equal respect." -- Michael W. Fox, Vice President, The Humane Society (The Associated Press, Jan. 15, 1989).
"We feel that animals have the same rights as a retarded human child" -- Alex Pacheco, Director, PETA, (New York Times, January 14, 1989).
"There is no rational basis for saying that a human being has special rights. A rat is a pig is a dog is a boy. They're all mammals." -- Ingrid Newkirk, PETA's President (in The Washington Times August 29, 1999).
They even decide to take it even further than that! They decide that not only are humans and animals equals, and should be treated as such, but that in the past, the KILLING of millions of humans is as equal to the killing of animals:
"Six million Jews died in concentration camps, but six billion broiler chickens will die this year in slaughter houses." -Ingrid Newkirk, President, PETA, The Washington Post, November 13, 1983.
They even dared comparing the heartbreaking pictures of black men being hung in trees, to pictures of cows being strung up. Here is a quote from nhregister.com, a newspaper site online:
One man demanded that the NAACP get involved immediately. Five minutes later, Scot X. Esdaile, president of the state and Greater New Haven chapters of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, arrived at the scene, surveyed the photos and blasted the organizers.
"Once again, black people are being pimped. You used us. You have used us enough," Esdaile said. "Take it down immediately."
"I am a black man! I can't compare the suffering of these black human beings to the suffering of this cow," said Michael Perkins, 47, of New Haven. He stood in front of a photo of butchered livestock hung next to the photo of two lynched black men dangling before a white mob.
"You can't compare me to a freaking cow," shouted John Darryl Thompson, 46, of New Haven, inches from Carr's face. "We don't care about PETA. You are playing a dangerous game."
Again, I'm not asking you to stop fighting animal torture, and the slaughtering of animals. Thats what this site is all about! I just want you to know what you stand for. If you honestly believe everything that PeTA stands for, then support them. But please, be informed.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
 |
Ok, everyone. I decided on a new picture. I'm going to be doing more work on it, so this is just a rough draft, BUT I love this! I'm going to be putting up a permanant link on my front page about my picture, but I will explain it here: (THANKS to Sn1per for this info, and helping me come up with a new logo. According to this, (and sn1per) that a flag being flown upside-down is a sign of distress, which I think is a perfect explaination for what I'm trying to do here! Anyway, if you have questions or comments, or think you can do a better job at a picture, let me know! I always love help! -thetruthaboutpeta
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|