“You fit in where you
get in” philosophy and Black & brown opportunism
Many people will claim publicly to be black, but in private
their vocabulary will suddenly be modified (ex: “so-called black” “brown” “non
white”)… By using the word “Black” I mean “African” and we all understand that
so many of us have a problem with that word so they stick, more or less, with
the first quoted word of this sentence. We also acknowledge that in their logic
of defining themselves according to the location where they reside (ex:
American) rather that their location of origin, they would call themselves “Martian”
if they were born on planet Mars. Black opportunists will attempt to include as
many people as possible as “their own”. For instance black opportunists will
attempt to include Latinos, but ask the Latinos themselves if they are black
and they will let you know. Black opportunists will attempt to include Indians
(Asians), but ask them and they will tell you themselves whether or not they
are black. All ethnic groups in this planet know who/what they are (or consider
themselves to be) and they do not include others.
Knowing that some black people do not consider themselves
black, it is stupid to try to include non-blacks as such.
That is without detailing the obvious and repetitious racism
(verbal and physical) regularly expressed by the same groups that black
nationalists are attempting to include. At least the lost negroes who do not
consider themselves black only exercise the verbal racism.
Arguments:
“We all come from the same African ancestors”.
In this case I do not see any reason to exclude European
Caucasians only.
“Look what Europeans have done”.
Asian Caucasians have done the same before and for even
longer (1000 years of arabo-muslim slavery, countless of previous attacks and
even invasions).
But black opportunists will “sweep under the rug” these
facts in order to remain part of a group as large as possible.
I heard before someone part of an organisation that is
allegedly for “Black people” say “I do not see color” “I look at people’s
action).
In this case why dealing with an organisation for “Black
people” in the first place ? (Because “you fit in where you get in”).
Conveniently, with this mentality no matter which type of
Caucasian (even the European) it can be “all good in the hood” as long as you
do not see any bad actions committed by them.
You should mediate on this quote from Mao Tse-Tung (that I
first heard from the mouth of Fred Hampton) :
“Politics is war
without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed”.
Political parties do not mix, let alone systems (ex: Capitalism
& Communism). Yet you want to talk about “revolution” and/or “nation
building” while claiming “your people” (black people) and others at the same
time? You are supposed to stand for something, you cannot claim everything and
anything altogether. You need to know where to draw a line otherwise do not
talk about “black people”.
We must make the difference between those who happened to be
born black, and those who are down for black people.
Now some say “my skin is not black, it’s brown”, then why
don’t you call yourself African ?
What about those who have a more natural hue (a darker
complexion), isn’t their skin color black ?
Why take your own case and make a generalization with it ?
NUMBERS PHILOSOPHY
That is what make one a groupie (otherwise called a sheep).
Enough said.
Religious opportunism
& “open minded” believers
Some claim “Black Power” but when a white man is “attacked”
(criticized) they go to defend him.
Newsflash : this is not “Black Power”. If your religion
stands in the way of your convictions then you should make a choice.
You cannot claim to go hard on the “cracker” except some
for “religious purposes”.
You cannot claim the white man is the devil and have a white
prophet.
You cannot claim the white man is the devil and have a white
god.
But today you still have plenty of black people with this
illogical reasoning.
Exodus 1:15
“And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and
the name of the other Puah:
And he said, when ye do the office of a midwife to the
Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him:
but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.”
Qur’an 2:49
“And when we delivered you from Firon's (pharaoh’s)
people, who subjected you to severe torment, killing your sons and sparing your women, and in this there was a great
trial from your Lord.”
Stop trying to claim Kemet when it suits you while you believe
in falsehood at the same time.
You choose to dishonour our ancestor just follow other
people’s religion, well it’s up to you, but no “black talk” from you then.
You still have some people today who dare to say that “Islam
abolished slavery” (also that it was the first religion to do so).
Arabized negroes take on the struggles of their masters,
they prioritized their masters interest, that’s why they talk about Zionism and
the ..Middle East.. all day but they don’t say a word about Sudan
They regularly condemn the American presidents, but just ask
them:
“Do you condemn the Sudanese president ?”
They complain about the American government, but just ask
them:
“Do you condemn the Sudanese government ?”
They complain about the police (and “crackers” in general,
politicians…) but just ask them:
“Do you condemn the Janjaweed killing and our brothers,
raping our sisters and enslaving our people ?”
Question to the reader :
Have you even seen these arabized negroes, who scream and
shout for the causes of their masters, publicly raised the above issues
?
See if they are willing to answer “yes” to these questions publicly. Otherwise they are nothing
but cowards.
If anyone condemns you for something but not others when
they are doing the same thing (or worse), they probably take you for an idiot.
Do you think it is ok for a 50 year old man to have sex with
a 9 year old girl, yes or no ?
Some may say “that’s not in the Qur’an but in the hadiths” so now here comes the “pick and choose”
option.
All of a sudden, only the Qur’an is valid, so what about the
hadiths which give information on the life of Muhammad ?
What about the hadiths that give information about Bilal ?
I might be wrong but from the last time I checked, Bilal is
not in the Qur’an.
But it’s ok, rather than answering “yes” or “no” you will
quote anything and everything until you feel better.
Because you are “open minded".
LAME SCHOLARSHIP
- Drawings
as “evidence”
- Current
pictures as “ancient situation”
(arabized negroes showing pictures of African Muslims today
pretending that it has been this way thousands of years ago).
- Claiming
mythical lands, mythical people and fictional stories as “History”
- Talking
about African enslavement as if it was started by the Europeans.
These lames will sweep 1000 years of slavery under the rug,
they will not mention the arabo-muslim slavery which started before the transatlantic
slave trade, lasted longer than the transatlantic slave trade and is still
going on today after the transatlantic slave trade.
Wake up! That’s not knowledge, it’s worst than ignorance
because they know, yet they avoid it. Tricknology at its best.
And so many of us are foolish enough to support that kind of
people, listening to their non sense and say things like “wow that’s deep”.
How pitiful!
ARROGANCE OF
IGNORANCE
People want to teach but they don’t want to learn.
You all want to kick knowledge right ? Answer these simple
questions:
- Can
anyone provide any archaeological evidence that mentions Moses during his
lifetime, yes or no ?
- Can
anyone provide any archaeological evidence that mentions Yeshua (Jesus
Christ) during his lifetime, yes or no ?....
He allegedly did all this:
-> Resurrected a girl
-> Resurrected a man
-> walked on water
-> gave sight to a blind man
-> multiplied bread and fish
-> changed water into wine
-> "healed" or put back an ear that was cut off
-> the day he died there was an "eclipse" and a earthquake
-> he resurrected
-> He rose to the skies in front of a crowed
Surely someone would have wrote something about it at the time
“ROLLING WITH IT”
Too many spent so many years learning falsehood and when
reality strikes (truth) they are not humble enough to admit that they were
wrong. If you find out that something is wrong you’re supposed to make an
appropriate correction if possible.
If you pass on the lies then you are a deceiver, you are
lying to our people!
Today, some Judeo-christianized
negroes claim that the so-called Hebrew-Israelites founded and/or ruled Kemet.
Today, some Arabized
negroes claim that the so-called Moors (Muslims) founded and/or ruled Kemet.
You even have negroes showing artefacts of Caucasians and
claiming that they are black people.
I am sure that many of you have noticed how much arabized
negroes regularly attack Afrocentricity, that is simply because it doesn’t
glorify their belief system. The slick excuse/claim that it is a “recent
ideology” doesn’t make sense because so are the movements that these arabized
negroes are following. How funny that suddenly time matters so much, there is a
“need to go back” (unfortunately it is not a Sankofa mentality), to go “to the
source”. So they will go as far as the 20’s, or the 7th century, or
better yet the beginning of the common era (year zero), or maybe the period of
the fictional biblical character Moses (around 1500 B.C.E), or probably the
period of Abraham (around 2000 B.C.E). Who knows, perhaps they will go the
farthest according to their belief system, therefore forget about the million
years old bone remains, it all starts around 4000 B.C.E.
(As with every contradiction in the Bible I expect excuses such
as the popular "one day is like a thousand days for god" but there we
go)
Abraham went to Egypt under the 12th dynasty, which means around 2000 B.C. He left Haran
at 75 to go in Egypt and stopped at a few places. A few years later, at 86 his Egyptian
wife Agar gave birth to his eldest son Ishmael. If we keep 80 years old as an
average, the probable age of Abraham when he arrived in Egypt, we can work out
when the world was created (according to the Torah).
Birth of Abraham (2000 + 80) 2080 B.C
age of Terah at the birth of his
son Abraham : 70
age of Nahor at the birth of his
son Terah : 29
age of Serug at the birth of his son Nahor
: 30
age of Reu at the birth of his son Serug : 32
age of Peleg at the birth of his son Reu : 30
age of Eber at the birth of his son Peleg : 34
age of Shelah at the birth of his son Eber : 30
age of Arpachshad at the birth of his son Shelah : 35
age of Shem at the birth of his son Arpacshad : 100
age of Noah at the birth of his son Shem : 500
age of Lamech at the birth of
his son Noah : 182
age of Methuselah at the birth of his son Lamech : 187
age of Enoch at the birth of his son Methuselah : 65
age of Jared at the birth of his son Enoch : 162
age of Mahalalel at the birth of his son Jared : 65
age of Kenan at the birth of his son Mahalalel : 70
age of Enosh at the birth of his son Kenan : 90
age of Seth at the birth of his son Enosh : 105
age of Adam at the birth of his son Seth : 130
Which gives 4026 B.C.E ............(before
common era)
If we add today's date (2009) it means it happened 6,035 years ago.
Given Take a 100 or even maybe a 1000 years for those who will disagree the
most, we still have a very approximate date according to the details given in
the Bible.
Question: Do you really believe that the world was
created 6000 years ago ?
LEGACY HIJACKING
“Malcolm X was a Muslim”
We all heard it over and over again but don’t forget to
mention that until his death his was the head of an organization for black
people only.
The same goes for Khalid Abdul Muhammad (by the way there is
a strange silence concerning him talking about KEMET).
“Nat Turner was a Christian” (as if he could be anything
else at the time and place).
Oh yes Nat Turner was a “Christian”, but what did he do ? Do
white Christians pay homage to him ?
While I’m at it, here is a quote from Nat Turner:
“[…] and I then found on the leaves in the woods hieroglyphic characters, and
numbers, with the forms of men in different attitudes, portrayed in blood,
and representing the figures I had seen before in the heavens”.
Organization:
Isn’t it strange that so many people claim that “no on did
what our leader did” and so forth ?
Isn’t it strange how they sometimes make comparisons but
they leave out the leader of the largest ever Pan-African organization ?
MARCUS GARVEY is
a great example to follow, he was proud of his roots and he never denied them
contrary to many contemporary
so-called leaders. You will notice that he didn’t need heavy
emphasis on religion to get by.
When people know they are cowards, they would rather see you
as one of them so they can feel better.
They don’t have any benefit with you following the path of
strong courageous ancestors, and remember that their faith (belief system) gets
in the way so no matter how much killing, rape, castration, mutilation,
enslavement a doctrine have brought, for them that is the best way.
KEMET
Besides those who appear to try to limit Kemet to “Osiris,
Isis, Horus” (USR, AST, HRU) and even pronounce Maat “Mayat” (you do not say
“beeble” do you ?). Besides those who appear to try to limit Kemet to spirituality
only, when it is physically marvellous and original,
plentiful of undeniably unmatched constructions while at the
same time some claim supreme wisdom but yet cannot even build a hut.
The groupies say: “There’s not only Kemet” (as if we said
so).
Do you tell Jews/Christians “there’s not only
Israel/Jerusalem” ?
Do you tell Muslims “there’s not only Mecca”
?
Do you tell Catholics “there’s not only the Vatican”
?
The groupies say: “there were other empires”
Are you talking about the same time period ?
What can you tell me about the “other countries” (that you
are so interested in all of a sudden, yes African countries) 5000 years ago ?
Have you ever tried to talk about things that you know ?
Have you ever considered going in chronological order ?
By that I mean logical chronological order, not applying a
14th century situation to ancient African history.
Not skipping an empire that lasted 3000 years to jump to 2
million years old bone remains.
Not claiming Islam before the 7th century.
Do you think that there is any pride in mentioning African
kings who converted to other people’s religion then waged war on their own kind
just because they didn’t have the same religion ?
Finally ask yourself:
What do you share the most on networking sites, information
or jokes ?
How many history books by black authors have you read ?
What were your ancestors doing before the common era (the
year zero) ?
As I am writing this, I wonder if black people have become
the most opportunist individuals on the planet.
20/08/09
Shaka-Ndugu-KMT
http://www.afrostyly.com/english
http://www.youtube.com/user/AFROSTYLYY
http://www.myspace.com/afrostyly
.