MySpace


RETRO SLASHERS



Last Updated: 7/25/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 31
Sign: Scorpio

Country: AU
Signup Date: 10/7/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Friday, June 26, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities




Click on the above image to read our exclusive review of Dario Argento's GIALLO.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
Thursday, June 18, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities



Monday, June 15, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities




Click on the mage to view a brand new indepth interview with Ulli Lommel, the director of the 1980 video nasty THE BOOGEYMAN!
Saturday, May 23, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities


Rumour has it that you were a med student who changed majors to film, before later enrolling at UCLA. How did you first develop an interest in filmmaking and what kind of projects were you working on during those early years?
“I was a pre-med student at Stephen F Austin University in Nacogdoches, Texas. My doctor uncle did his pre-med there. They are recognized for their School of ForestryLumberjacks. Maybe that’s why I dared to GO IN THE WOODS and am proud to say,even now - “I’m a lumberjack and I’m okay!” My early film interest in filmmaking developed with my family’s enjoyment of films. I really liked Disney films, westerns with Roy Rogers and Abbot and Costello comedies. I would laugh so long and loud others of the audience would complain to my parents. I took over the family’s 8mm camera and started shooting little bits of film. The local drug store and film processing counter had film cement but no splicers so I used a pair of pliers to do my first editing. The pliers had grooves for gripping so the cement splice produced a sort of ripple effect on all my cuts. 8mm splicing tape became available around that time and in high school I cast friends in a number of longer film shorts.”
and the sports teams are the


What can you reveal about your earlier erotic features, such as Escape to Passion and The Dirtiest Game. What convinced you to try that route into the industry and in which ways do you feel they prepared you for your later work?
“I really wanted to make a feature film after doing shorts and documentaries at the UCLA Film School. Escape to Passion and Dirtiest Game were my first features following the low budget rules Roger Corman set forth in various interviews. On a limited budget with a primary schedule of three days (not counting pickup shots) you could get a commercial project of a theatrical type if you had at least 10 exploitation (action or sex) scenes each occurring no more than 10 minutes apart. “One thrill a reel (10 minutes)” was Corman’s motto as I recall. My thought was that with 10 sex scenes for an erotic film I could do anything else I wanted to do as far as the rest of the story went. Dirtiest Game tested the limits of what a adult film audience would endure. My goal was to inflame or repulse the people who happened to be in the audience. It was successful in that many people left the theatre but did not stop to ask for their money back. Only one patron became physically ill as far as I heard from the distributor. It had a political story line and it was very popular in Washington DC where a bar near the capital bought a 16mm print and ran it every night until the print fell apart. It took about a year. The film was very gross and so had a limited appeal. Most of my friends after seeing the film didn’t speak to me for about a month. Escape to Passion was my attempt to do an adult film that with minor edits could pay in regular drive ins and in addition, not endanger any friendships. It was a gangster film that had more action and plenty of comedy that ended with a police shootout at a Crisco orgy. Also it had a song or two. It did play drive ins and nobody threw up or ran out of the theatre. The production schedule doubled with more story and action added. I learned the wisdom of doing low budget films in a series of three day interrupted schedules which would allow some rest, recovery and some added preparation, otherwise the naturally occurring problems and stress would overwhelm a small crew.”



How come you decided to move from comedy with Boogie Vision to producing a low budget horror movie?
Crest Films was distributing Boogie Vision nationally and it was doing so-so business when Universal approached them with major funding to distribute Kentucky Fried MovieBoogie Vision was dropped and I decided to do the distribution myself since nobody else wanted to take it on. When I finished going bankrupt and recovering in Utah working post production at Sunn Classic, horror films were popular with audiences once more, so I set out to do a horror film that could have national distribution and I was more or less successful.”
on an exclusive basis.


How did the initial concept for Don’t Go in the Woods come about and which films or stories were an influence on you during the writing of the script? Was it always your intention to make a slasher film or was your original vision substantially different?
“In Salt Lake City my post production work with Sunn Classic was drawing to a close, the NBC production contracts were coming to an end for Sunn Classic as Paul Klien, NBC president and chief supporter of Sunn Classic, was finishing his association with the network. Sunn Classics went up for sale but its stock and trade, the local Utah scenic beauty, was still available to all low budget filmmakers craving affordable production value. Inspiration was gushing forth all around the mountain community. In the book stores an urban legend book by a Salt Lake writer had just come out, a wild man legend from my East Texas roots was gnawing away consistently at the back of my mind and the local Salt Lake stories of hikers sometimes murdered in the surrounding mountains started to play into the mix. I had just read a stripped down paperback thriller called Hunters Moon and elements of a potential script started to come into a very soft focus. It was at this moment an old friend Peter Turner, a writer’s agent from LA, called asking what I was up to. When I said I was thinking about developing a horror script, Peter snapped back, “Save yourself the trouble, I’m sending you one that’s already perfect.” That script was Sierra by Garth Eliassen and it did happen to be almost perfect. I did a quick rewrite with Garth to fit the new location, the new budget (very low) and added more bloody killing scenes while dropping almost all the existing dialogue scenes. I had a plan. I would shoot outside for daylight avoiding having to light the set except for the few night scenes and use my unblimped 35mm Arri recording only a scratch sound track. By limiting the sync dialogue to a minimum amount it would be simpler and cheaper to replace in a sound studio. As the seventies drew to a close, I was thinking lots of blood and gore in the Misumi Kenji Sword of Vengeance-style and a touch of humor would do the trick. So I took it to the woods and did it my way. I would say Woods was as I intended it bloody and yet with an element of humor.”



Who was Peter Turner and what part did he play in the making of the movie?  How was the project funded and what kind of budget were you working with?
“When I finished at Sunn Classic I had put back some money, enough to get me thru production. With the film in the can I held off sending it to the lab until Roberto and Suzette Gomez came on board as producers funding the next stage. I used credit to get the answer print for Woods and that allowed me to find a distributor who paid off the lab thru a series of deals for VHS and foreign rights. The total budget ended up around $150,000.”


Is it true that the entire film stock that you used to shoot the movie was about to be recycled and so you were able to purchase it considerably cheaper?
“The film stock was short ends that were out of date and slated to be reclaimed for the silver. I paid under $400 and took a big chance which DeLuxe Labs was able to pay off on when they expertly corrected the fading color into a nice inter negative.”


How did you cast for the film and were you already familiar with many of your collaborators prior to commencing work on Don’t Go in the Woods? With most of them rarely appearing in film or television after 1981, were any professional actors?
“The mood on the set of Don’t Go in the Woods changed wildly from day to day. Just as the weather snapped from one extreme to another, one scene might go along like a summer picnic with old friends and then we’d find ourselves in something like a Werner Herzog-Klaus Kinski dogfight over creative differences. All our problems were ultimately resolved fairly quickly and we kept moving on our most sacred production schedule. Things happened at a fast clip so actors often seemed a little lost as to a scene’s place in the story. The good actors quickly adapted to my manic vision and by the final days of the shoot we were reading each other’s mind anticipating the blocking and bits of physical business. The theatre scene in Salt Lake City was pretty well developed so as a director I was able to get really professional results with a few notable exceptions. You know the ones, we need not name names. Ken Carter was a DJ from Texas who had been in my high school 8mm short films and very much wanted to play the Sheriff. Frank Millen I knew from UCLA Film School and who appeared in almost every film I did.”



How did Tom Drury become involved and how did you first make his acquaintance? As he was already a singer at that point, was he also an actor or was Don’t Go in the Woods his first appearance?
“I met Tom Drury when working for a local Salt Lake City producer on a VHS series. Tom did theatre locally, did a few USO tours in Southeast Asia singing with his wife and had some Daniel Boone TV series exposure. The hikers were recruited by Peter Turner and had appeared in minor parts in Boogie Vision. The LA cast all worked in the film business. When Tom Drury had a work conflict during our on and off two week schedule I doubled him as the maniac in the off angles and long shots. Running the show as producer and director is so overwhelming the idea of being an actor as well is beyond reason.”


Whereabouts in Utah was the movie shot and what kind of schedule did you have? What were the main obstacles you had to overcome in order to make the shoot run as smoothly as possible?
“We shot everything east and south of Salt Lake City in the Watsch Mountians mainly in Lambs Canyon where the Cabin is located. The Stockdale cabin was our production base. We used the three days on-one day off schedule for the main cast of hikers. The other victims were shot before and after the main schedule on weekends, one victim and location at a time, using the Lambs canyon base. If you don’t have a big budget you had better know who to go to find what you need for your production.”


For the special effects, you chose your then-wife, Kathie Bryan, as your makeup artist. Was she experienced at designing gruesome effects or was this an effort to keep the cost to a minimum?
“Kathie was involved in those high school 8mm projects as well and besides working in the drama club there, her college art major and background in painting and sculpture gave her plenty of experience and training to draw on for the make up and effects challenge in Woods. Kathie and I did some dinosaur animation together for a National Geographic TV show early on.  Kathie did the blood. Kraft BBQ sauce (non-chunky) with Red dye #2 worked best. It coagulated like blood does and was okay to swallow. The spicy nature was a problem for some actors who had to hold it in their mouths over several takes due to the stinging and burning of the spices and vinegar.”



How come you chose to dub the movie during post-production and were you pleased with the results?
“Starting with Lady Street Fighter, I began the using the Italian low budget approach to production, shooting without sync sound. If you have a background in dialogue replacement  and know how much it’s used on TV shows and films, it’s easy to see it is a good way of saving money. By recording a sound track without the expense of a blimped or a sound deadened camera on location you can ignore airplanes, traffic and boom or mike noise that ruin so many takes and cause endless delays. Sunn ClassicWoods re-mastered 25 years later for DVD had it’s sound improved to an amazing degree by the advanced electronics that are today standard in almost all video sound equipment. The original quality was disappointing in the extreme but the solution was beyond the limits of the rock bottom budget.”
dubbed almost all their scenes for performance. Well known professionals get paid minimum wages, union scale, when they replace dialogue in a studio far from locations and they also play multiple parts since they aren’t seen. If your studio has limited electronics the recording quality can’t be adjusted so finely that you can’t tell the difference between dubbed and non dubbed dialogue.


Don’t Go in the Woods boasts a bizarre score, much different to the standard slasher style.  Did you have a specific style in mind as you were shooting and how specific were you with your composer about what you wanted?
“The score was a grand experiment. The composer H Kingsley Thurber worked on industrial projects in Salt Lake City and began in that vein when he started to work on Woods. In our meeting after the first recording session I explained a starting point for the score should be John Carpenter’s approach for Halloween and then for Kingsley to go as far as he could push himself into original musical territory. Anything possible that he could get on tape was just what I wanted to hear. And I loved it. The Woods song was a separate tape done as a joke for my ears alone but it caught the spirit I was trying to follow so I just had to use it for the titles.”


How do you feel about the treatment that the movie received in the UK, with it being subsequently banned as a ‘video nasty’ during the eighties? Were you surprised by this reaction and what do you think was the main cause for this?
“I always wanted to entertain on the verge of offending so I was tickled to be so well received in the UK. I was of course surprised that anybody would be so morally threatened by Woods that the government would become involved.”



The film has often been referred to as ’so bad it’s good,’ due to its camp nature and inept acting.  Do you feel this is a fair statement and what are your own thoughts on the movie?
“Later in high school and college independent low budget films really caught my attention. Italian sword and sandal epics or anything from American International Pictures had me racing to the theatres where I was talking back to the screen, making dumb jokes and attempting to improve the dialogue and story lines with my solo surreal commentaries. The Roger Corman horror films were the best. That life changing paradigm shift came crashing down in a screening of The Terror with the realization that Jack Nicholson was actually playing the character of an incredibly bad miscast actor with a terribly inappropriate accent in the middle of this Vincent Price horror film. This was art! “Bad” could be great. And so began my long search for the aesthetic of the “Bad.” Jack N being goofy again in Easy Rider seeming not to be acting, Val Lewton stretching his budget with affecting moments of what was not seen, and Orson Welles pulling us into that “other” world in Touch of Evil all helped put me on the road to Don’t Go In The Woods.”


Over the years, were you proud of what you had achieved with Don’t Go in the Woods and at what point did you realise that it had become a cult classic?
“When Don’t Go in the Woods first came out audience reaction was very limited. The movie sort of faded from the screen without much notice. While The Hollywood Reporter reviewed it as the worst film ever made even that questionable distinction was all too easily lost when the very next day another opening film replaced Woods as “worst ever.” In light of Woods current newfound interest and popularity, my feeling about the film is that it’s like telling a joke where the audience just shrugs and walks out, then thirty years later they stop what they are doing and all start laughing. A long wait but the laughter lives. Was it something I did? I didn’t realize Woods had become a cult classic until Steven Thrower contacted me for a series of interviews that were to be part of his Nightmare USA , slowly the light dawned.”


Have you ever considered directing a sequel or remake and have you ever heard of any studio or producer expressing interest in making one?
“Yes, I have recently been approached by a number of persons inquiring about a sequel or sequels. Anything can happen. That’s all I can say at this point.”


Sunday, May 10, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities




To check out RETRO SLASHERS' exclusive review of Wesley Strick's A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET remake, to be produced by Platinum Dunes and released by New Line Cinema, click on the image above to visit our official site...
Tuesday, May 05, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities




Click on the image above and visit our official site where we have a new column dedicated to Italian giallo and exploitation films.  Read our articles on such classics as Deep Red and Blood and Black Lace, as well as plenty of obscure gems.  Keep an eye outfor our constant updates...
Thursday, April 30, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities


God bless the eighties... spandex, Rubik's Cubes and Corey Feldman's mullets, what a fun decade that was.  Everything was about excess, from the fashion and the MTV music videos to the trailers that would populate the first fifteen minutes of a rented VHS tape.  It is worth revisiting these old treasures if you haven't yet thrown them out as there is something truly special about them.  They seem to perfectly capture the era in which they were produced, and the ones from the eighties were the most outrageous of all. Last year, I attended a film festival in which they screened an original print of Linda Blair's 1984 exploitation classic Savage Streets, and beforehand we were subjected... nay, treated... to a bundle of old trailers, from the likes of C.H.U.D. to long-forgotten efforts.  This was almost like revisiting my childhood, seeing all these old delights, and so here is my homage to the decade that taste forgot, with a selection of eighties slasher trailers.

Enjoy!



























Wednesday, April 22, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities


What kind of movies did you enjoy as you were growing up and which do you feel helped shape you as a filmmaker later in life?
“I enjoyed a wide variety of movies while growing up on Long Island. New York had a number of independent TV stations that exposed me to all kinds of genre flicks. Although I liked westerns and action pictures, I think I gravitated to the sci-fi/horror titles because I liked being scared. I’ll never forget waiting for Chiller Theatre to run every Saturday night.”

How did you get your first break as a filmmaker and what would you say are your strengths and weaknesses as both a writer and director?
“I got my first break doing The Lost Empire for Plitt Theatres. The late owner, Henry Plitt (a decorated war hero), wanted to make a low budget sci-fi action picture as a tax loss. I never knew that when I made the show, so I put my heart and soul into the project. When it finally got completed, Plitt actually liked it enough to give it a wide theatrical release - where it actually made some money.”

Where did the idea for Chopping Mall originate from and what was it about malfunctioning technology that intrigued you so much?
“Chopping Mall was inspired by an old Ivan Tors flick from the 1950s entitled Gog. Vestron Video came to Julie Corman (Roger’s wife and a fine producer in her own right) looking for a film about ‘a killer in a mall.’ She said if I wrote a good one, I could direct it. I recalled the plot from Gog involved a couple of dangerous computer controlled robots patrolling an underground scientific lab in the Arizona desert. Co-writer Steve Mitchell and I transposed the idea to a mall and we were off and running. Some people have said we took our concept from a 1970s TV movie about guard dogs in a mall called Trapped, but in actuality neither Steve or I ever saw that flick.



How would you describe the making of the movie and was it an enjoyable experience? How come the name was changed from Killbots to Chopping Mall and did you always intend on the film being tongue in cheek or did you originally conceive it as a more straight-forward horror?
“It most certainly was enjoyable. For three full weeks, we owned an entire mall from 9pm to 7am in the morning. It was really eerie shooting in a deserted mall all night long. But with such attractive ladies such as Barbara Crampton and Kelli Maroney on hand, there was never a dull moment. The original script was called Robot, which was changed to Killbots for the first preview. Unfortunately, that title failed to ignite any interest at the box office - so Roger Corman pulled the film and demanded a new title. He knew the film delivered, and felt all it needed was a fresh approach in the advertising. One afternoon we showed the picture in the company screening room, searching for a new was to sell it. As it turned out, the janitor happened to be in the room changing floor lights. When the film ended, he turned to everybody and said “Why don’t you just call it Chopping Mall? Corman and I looked at each other, raised our eyebrows and the new title came into being there and then.

How successful was the movie and how come you never developed Chopping Mall 2?

“The movie was very successful under the new title, especially on home video. You couldn’t go into a video shop back in the 80s and not see a couple of copies. I never had the desire to do a sequel. I felt the idea was exploited fully in the first film.”

How come you decided to direct Sorority House Massacre II? The original was one of the few slashers to have been directed by a woman, how would you compare you approach to the genre compared to Carol Frank’s?
“I never saw the original. My film (SHM2) was originally titled Jim Wynorski’s House of Babes. No kidding. Roger and wife Julie were going away to Europe for a week, and I came to Julie with the idea of shooting a slasher movie on the sets from Slumber Party Massacre 3 and Rock and Roll High School Forever - which were both scheduled to be dismantled . She put a hold on striking the sets and told me to make the film while they were gone without telling husband Roger. I wrote the script in four days, cast it in two and started shooting the moment they left town. Roger only got wind of it after they returned. At first it was to be called Nightie Nightmare, but ultimately it got the Sorority House Massacre 2 moniker.”



Having already directed other sequels (Deathstalker II, The Return of the Swamp Thing) did you feel confident about taking over a franchise and what new aspects did you hope to bring to the slasher genre?
“I made SHM2 on the fly in seven days. I was adding humor whenever possible and making sure there was plenty of nudity along the way. At first, the script ended when the cops arrived in the morning and found the Gail Harris character alive and holding the knife. I said to hell with that and continued on.bringing Orville back to life one more time to take care of business.”

Hard to Die is sometimes referred to as Sorority House Massacre III. Is this a true continuation of the series and how come it is known under different names?
“When Roger Corman saw what I did for his wife in just seven days, he wanted me to do the same for him. He’d just finished a deadly dull comedy called Corporate Assets (I think that was the title, but don’t quote me) and there were office sets left standing all over his studio complex. He turned me loose and said just remake the picture again, which I happily did. Only with Hard to Die, I took Orville’s hardships to even further extremes.”

Looking back on your work during that era, are you proud of what you achieved and have you ever considered returning to any of these movies, with either a sequel or a remake?

“I had fun making both those movies, but they were a product of the time.profitable because the video retail market was still going strong. I don’t think a sequel would be financially viable at this point, although I still have a hidden desire to make Orville in Orbit. Maybe someday.”



INTERVIEW: Christian Sellers

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 

Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities



What was your first memory of Halloween and what kind of effect did that have on your life? Prior to this experience, what kind of films were you a fan of?
“I have been a horror fan since I was 12 years old. I saw the original Halloween on TV in the early 80’s when I was in elementary school and it scared me so much that for months I would envision Michael Myers following me as I walked to/from school. I was immediately obsessed with the horror genre and begged my mother to take me and my twin brother to every horror movie that came out, and she did. Halloween II, Alone in the Dark, Visiting Hours, A Nightmare On Elm Street… I have such great memories of watching those movies with my mom and my brother, screaming all the way through them.”

How would you compare this franchise to the other principal slasher films (such as Friday the 13th and A Nightmare on Elm Street)? What is it about the character of Michael Myers that has appealed to so many for so long?
“I have been studying these films for years from working on the documentaries I’ve done, and here’s how I see it: Halloween ushered in what is collectively considered mainstream modern horror; Friday the 13th is a Halloween clone that defined the genre, exacting the “recipe” to these films and by making the killer the hero instead of the villain; and A Nightmare On Elm Street, yet another clone, took the killer hero to new heights by giving him a voice, at the same time combining the character with an artful cinematic execution not seen before. These killers – Michael, Jason and Freddy – have become the modern-day Dracula, Werewolf and Mummy. They are iconic, and that’s why they live on.”

With various filmmakers taking the series in different directions, which of the movies do you think worked well and which were failures. What aspects do you feel need to be present to make a decent Halloween film?
“Halloweens 1, 2, 4 and H20 were the only films in my opinion that were “successes”… I of course love all of the films, but those movies worked well because they were all “firsts”. Part 1 was obviously lightning in the bottle; Part 2 was the “first” true horror sequel; Part 4 re-introduced Myers which was a “first” in the industry (until 1988, no other horror franchise brought back a dead killer, especially after skipping a sequel that didn’t involve him!); and H20 was the first time a horror series visited a character from 20 years prior. Halloween kept re-inventing the horror wheel, and that, to me, is what makes the series to fascinating. As for the aspects that need to be present to make a decent Halloween film, you need Michael, and a writer and director who know what makes Michael tick. And you probably need Dean Cundey!”

Is there one specific moment from any of the Halloween films that has made a lasting impression?
“The hot tub killing Halloween II was something that unnerved me for a long time. I saw that movie when I was 13 years old, and I don’t think I was ready for such a vulgar and gory killing. The skin peeling off of Nurse Karen’s face, the way Michael seemed to enjoy the killing, his harsh discarding of the dead body on the floor like a wet towel… It just got under my skin. To this day it still creeps me out.”

Why do you feel the mask is so menacing and has become such a staple of popular culture, much like Jason’s hockey mask or Leatherface’s chainsaw?
“Michael’s mask IS Michael. Carpenter made a point of telling the audience this when Laurie rips it off of his face at the end of Halloween, and Michael stops attacking her to put it back on. Talk about menacing. You wonder why he’s so attached to this piece of rubber that covers his face. And of course the expressionless look to it adds to the scare factor. If he were wearing the Emmet Kelly clown mask that they also considered, I don’t think it would have had the same staying-power. Michael’s “look” is proprietary to HIM and he has now become a brand. The clown mask would have been a mistake I think.”

Which character do you feel you most relate to with these films and was there any specific girl that you had a crush on when you were younger?
“I had a huge crush on P.J. Soles! She is a good friend of mine today so it’s strange to say that I had a crush on her. As for who I relate to, I definitely related to Dr. Loomis. He was the main draw to Halloween for me. His character was so engrossing and when he died I felt that the series died for me. He was obsessed with Michael, and his performance was nothing short of brilliant every time he was on screen. Anyone that can say the line, “I thought that he would burn in hell, but in my heart I knew that hell would not have him,” and genuinely elevate his character with sincerity and believability, has an eternal bow from me! He was a talented actor and brought more to these films that I think people realize.”

The fifth and sixth movie were critically mauled upon release due to their uneven plots and generic characters, whilst the third was dismissed for diverting away from the standard formula. What are your own opinions on these films and how do you feel about Rob Zombie’s remake of the original?
“Part 3 was an obvious mistake, but it taught the producers something and it’s the reason why there are so many sequels. So in the end that movie proved to be a good thing. Plus, after repeated viewings, I have come to really enjoy it. Tom Atkins is a stitch in that film. Part 5 is one of my favorites in the series because of the performances by Donald Pleasence and Danielle Harris, and Part 6 has two good kills in it that I like (when Kara is looking through the window and Michael stabs the girl; and When Kim Darby’s character dies). But that movie was a mess! Michael has sex with his niece? Give me a break. I can see why John Carpenter wants nothing to do with the series anymore!”

You first expressed your passion for the series by creating a website, halloweenmovies.com . How did this come about and how long did it take for it to be recognised as the official home of Michael Myers?
“I did not create HalloweenMovies.com, Brian Martin and Bruce Dierbeck did. That was back in 1997 I believe, and when they decided to pass the torch in 2002, they contacted me and I happily took over. A few months ago I just stepped down after 7 years due to not having time to run the site anymore, and there is now a new webmaster, Brian Raymann.”



Having met various cast and crew from the films, which in particular would you say were the most memorable experiences?
“P.J. Soles is an amazing person in so many ways. She has a genuine appreciation for the fans who line up to meet her, and she is always so giving and caring, and gives each person all the time they want with her. I also enjoyed meeting Nancy Loomis because her artwork intrigues me. Check out her website at nancykyes.com. I have had some negative experiences as well. Debra Hill, for example, yelled at me on the phone and hung up on me when I tried inviting her to the Halloween Returns To Haddonfield convention. At first I took it personally, but I later learned that she didn’t get along with Moustapha Akkad. But for a while there I was like, “What did I do?” That was the only conversation I ever had with her, and it wasn’t pretty!”

Having already established your support on the internet, you then co-wrote and produced the retrospective 25 Years of Terror. How did you make the transition from website to documentaries and would much of a challenge was it to bring all the old cast and crew back together to talk about films that were twenty or thirty years old?
“If you had told me that many of the key people involved in the Halloween franchise didn’t get along, I would never have put the Halloween Returns To Haddonfield convention together in 2003. I thought it was one big happy family, and all of the Halloween actors and producers got along… NOT. Thankfully I didn’t know what I was getting into because “Halloween: 25 Years of Terror” would never have come to fruition. I am a producer today because of that event. I was never really a webmaster by trade (I had a day job at a pharmaceutical company), I just ran this Halloween site and made enough connections to put on a Halloween-themed convention. After it was videotaped it made sense to cut a documentary together, and I suddenly found that I was a born producer. So that’s how that happened, and I’m producing more documentaries and movies today. They say things happen for a reason, and my Halloween obsession when I was 12 years old morphed into a career many years later. Funny how things make sense when you take a look back!”

How would you compare this documentary to His Name Was Jason, which you produced in honour of the Friday the 13th franchise?
“Halloween: 25 Years of Terror was my foray into producing, with a lot of mistakes and learning experiences, and so it was a very innocent and memorable time for me. There is a huge amount of love in that project, and it came from everyone who worked on it. It was a “first” so-to-speak… Yes, it’s a documentary, but when this 90-minute bonus feature took center stage on a stand-alone DVD release, a new sub-genre of DVD - the epic retrospective DVD – was born. At a time when Hollywood is re-making every movie under the sun, it’s the perfect time to look back on the films that came before, and so H25 opened the door to more of the same, which is why “His Name Was Jason: 30 Years of Friday the 13th” now exists. Comparing the two is asking me which of my two cats I like better. I love both projects, and there were things we did in HNWJ that we didn’t, or couldn’t, do with H25. We had tremendous production value in HNWJ, and I like that we didn’t tell the story of Friday the 13th on a movie-by-movie basis, as we did in H25. I am very proud of both documentaries because they tell the stories of the franchises, and dig deep to explore some things that perhaps the casual viewer wouldn’t consider, but die-hard fans would want to address. I am gearing up to do two more retrospectives, so keep your eyes out for them! My website is www.masimedia.net.”

Over the years, how has your website adapted and progressed, particularly with regards to the high profile remake which must have renewed fans interest?
“When I ran HM.com, I tried to keep the site’s overall look intimate and classy. To me, Halloween was never gaudy or over-the-top, so I designed the site with an understated sentiment in mind. I used to run a fansite called The Myers Museum, which Brian and Bruce saw and is the reason why they asked me to take over HM.com, and since it was a site that I owned I had tremendous freedom to do whatever I wanted in terms of content. I ran contests, gave away prizes (that I spent my own money on), integrated fan fiction, sold collectibles (which other people created), updated news on the series, had my own message board, etc., and it was a fanboy’s wet dream. When the Akkads hired me to run the official site, I was surprised, and somewhat dismayed, that I didn’t have the freedom to do with that site what I could do with my old one. I had to run everything through the “powers that be” for approval, and many times my ideas were rejected, so the site never became what I wanted it to be. I enjoyed running the site, but I missed my old one after a few years! During the 2007 re-make for example, I wasn’t able to post any on-set photos. I visited the set twice, met all the actors and crew, and took all kinds of pics, but I couldn’t post a thing on the site. I’m a creative soul that never likes to do things half-assed, so being limited in this way was very frustrating! But I look back on the HM.com years with a smile because in a way I couldn’t believe I was even part of it in the first place.”

Have you kept in touch with the makers of H2 during the making of the movie and have you been granted access to images and information that other sites are not aware of?
“No. I’m off and doing my own projects now, although I do keep in touch with Malek from time-to-time. I am also working with Danielle Harris on a new project, and I see all of actors at horror conventions all the time (at this weekend’s Fango show, for example).”

What do you think the future has in store for the franchise and have you ever considered pitching an idea for a sequel yourself (much like your friend Daniel Farrands did with The Curse of Michael Myers)?
“I wrote a Halloween script in 2000 called “Halloween: Obsession”, but I never got anywhere with it. I am more of a producer than a writer, so I’m sticking to hearing pitches instead of writing them! As for the future of Halloween, you can bet your arms and legs that the series will live on for countless sequels. Money is the only sure thing in Hollywood, and Myers has become a cash cow!”



INTERVIEW: Christian Sellers