MySpace


Annabelles Second Chance

Annabelles Second Chance


Last Updated: 10/31/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 38
Sign: Cancer

City: RICHMOND
State: VIRGINIA
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/10/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Saturday, August 29, 2009 

Current mood:  aggravated
Does Michael Vick deserve a second chance?  This is a very hot topic with just about everyone stepping in to voice their opinion and I will add one more to the fray. As far as the law is concerned, he has paid his debt to society.   He served 23 months in jail for federal racketeering.  He plead not guilty on animal cruelty and that was washed away in a plea agreement.  So, no, I don’t think he recognizes or feels sorry for killing those dogs.  He is sorry he threw away his career; he is sorry he got caught and he is sorry that he was found guilty. Let’s not forget how vigorously he blamed others for what happened and for leading him astray while declaring his innocence.  One would think from reading the letter to the judge and listening to his constant denials the he had no ability to think for himself. No ability to understand right from wrong or know that he was breaking the law and not only that, he was causing willful and cruel destruction of life.

Michael Vick was one of the highest paid players in the NFL and he threw it all away. He was the golden boy with a golden life and when he was caught, he lied and denied for as long as he could until the evidence piling up became overwhelming and all of his co conspirators turned on him.

After mere months in jail, he has been reinstated to the NFL and has found a a team to support him.  While he should be employable as I hope all people can find gainful employment, returning him without penalty to a multimillion dollar career where he serves as a role model for young children is a mistake. A horrible and tragic mistake. He is not role model material and while there are quite a few criminals and miscreants in the NFL, it is disappointing none the less.

I don’t know many felons (outside of the NFL) that are allowed to return to multimillion dollar careers.  Most individuals who are found guilty of a felony have to spend a long time atoning for their sins.  They become pariah’s in the community.  They find it difficult to pick up where they left off and few people are willing to give a second chance for fear they will fall back into the same old pattern.  That is not inappropriate in this situation.  As far as the law is concerned, he has paid his dues but as far as his moral culpability and his deficiency in character, that requires a lifetime of atoning.  For those who think Michael Vick is being singled out, that is simply not the case. I believe that all thugs, criminals, and drug dealers should be expelled from the NFL.

I watched the interview on 60 minutes and I was not impressed.  He stated his commitment to working with the HSUS and using his influence to stop cruelty.  However, he did not truly accept responsibility for his actions.  His statements were clear.....  "I was disgusted, you know, because of what I let happen to those animals” he said. "I could've put a stop to it. I could've walked away from it. I could've shut the whole operation down."  All the while with a slight smile on his face and compassionless/expressionless eyes.

What Vick does not acknowledge and has never acknowledged, either in his letter to the judge prior to incarceration or his 60 Minutes Interview post release, is how he participated in these crimes.  In both instances he skirts responsibility citing that he should not have let it happen, not that he actively took part.  He didn’t just fund the operation from the sidelines.  He didn’t let it happen as a spectator or silent partner - he was an active participant.  He was physically involved in the electrocution, drowning, beating and hanging of dogs that didn’t make his team.  Electrocution by car battery while drowning in a swimming pool is a cruel and horrible death and does not happen quickly. He stood and watched while his dog struggled to get out of the pool while it was fighting to live. To truly atone for his behavior he needs to acknowledge his participation in these crimes. He needs to take ownership of what he did, he should say to the public that he physically slammed a dog into the ground until it was broken and dead and for that he is truly sorry.  And he should mean it.

I watched this interview more than once hoping that I could come up with some defense for him, hoping that I missed one spark of true emotion or apology but I didn’t. When he was asked when he truly realized what he had done was wrong and Vick responded with:

“The first day I walked into prison and they slammed that door, I knew the magnitude of the decisions that I made..." and,"What I did, being away from my family, letting so many people down, letting myself down, not being out on the football field, being in a prison bed, in a prison bunk, writing letters home. That wasn't my life. That wasn't the way that things were supposed to be."

It is all about him and what he is sorry he lost. Over and over he has acknowledged it was wrong but only in relation to what it took away from him, not the lives that were broken and lost.  He 
‘now’ knows it was wrong but we’re not sure he understands why it was wrong.  I am not sure he truly grasps the horror that most people felt when they heard or read about how he and his friends killed dogs with their bare hands.  How much pain and terror those animals must have felt being killed by their owners after suffering abuse at their hands.  We are not sure he grasps that at all or really understands pain and suffering.  A dog’s capacity to love at times seems much greater than ours and their forgiveness is extraordinary.  The animals have probably forgiven him where we continue to debate…

There is one clip in the interview where it shows him speaking to children and encouraging them to love their animals - whatever animals they own. That appears to be the extent of his message.  He does not offer why. He does not offer that we should love and care for them because animals have the ability love and they feel and suffer when we are cruel.  And that life is valuable and should be cherished. That kindness is a gift.

If my opinion were solicited, I provide a resounding “NO”.  The American public does not need this kind of role model.  And as a spokes person for animal cruelty - a louder “NO”.  He does not speak for OUR breed and he should not be considered a positive influence. His decisions were not merely mistakes, they were a series of horrible decisions and a lifestyle of cruelty and suffering.  Six years of running a dog fighting operation  and systematically torturing and killing those dogs that didn’t fight hard enough or die in the pit is not simply a mistake.  A mistake is forgetting to mail a letter, not beating an animal to death. This is not simply one mistake but a long string of horrible decisions that potentially cite an inability to empathize with suffering, a lack of compassion and an outright disdain for life.  We have all read the few pieces of transcripts and evidence that was posted on the internet that explained in detail how the dogs were killed.  Pages and pages of documentation of terrible things that were done and done repeatedly if the dog didn’t die right away.  There is surely more that we were not privy.

He is not capable of spreading a compassionate message. He is not able to explain why we should care for our pets and treat them with kindness because he is not able to understand compassion for animals and kindness.  Certainly not while he himself does not understand and continues to skirt the responsibility of his actions. He has a deficiency in character that can not be fixed and certainly wasn’t fixed by 23 months in prison.  And will not be fixed as he is restored to his former glory without consequence.

“The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." Mahatma Gandhi”
Friday, May 15, 2009 
Come visit us on FACEBOOK

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=72848139157

Monday, June 04, 2007 

Annabelle's Second Chance is a non profit RESCUE.  We do not support or condone the breeding of pit bulls because of the overpopulation problem with our breed (APBT) and other bully breeds. We will only support breeding if it is done on a limited basis and done correctly. Sadly, there are a great deal of "breeders" out there and 80-90% of them are not doing it right.  They are not providing health testing on their stock (hips, eyes, patellas, cardiac), they are not involved in conformation events with their dogs.  They do not have titles on all of their dogs in conformation, obedience or any other legitimate dog sport.  They do not have temperament tested (TT) dogs.

We will not add breeders to our friends lists.  We will not add people to our friends list who elude to illegal activities or appear to promote illegal activities on their page.  We will read each and every profile before adding someone to our list.

We would love to make friends with other like minded bully people.  Those who just happen to own a bully dog of their own, those who are trainers, rescues, activitists, environmentalists, anyone with a positive mind set in regards to our dogs and changing the current image.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007 

Current mood:  accomplished

Rebuttal on the Handout:

'Pit Bull Terriers and Other Bully Breeds'
Trish King, Behavior & Training Dept. Marin Humane Society

[This handout includes vague language and sweeping generalizations regarding canine behaviors that may or may not be attributed to any specific breed and that are more likely due to a lack of breed specific knowledge. Our rebuttal comments are in ORANGE and inserted with brackets where appropriate.

First it should be well-established at the onset of our rebuttal that "pit bull" refers to a type of dog, not a breed. It actually encompasses several breeds and anything that has a certain look regardless of the actual lineage.  The actual purebred names are the American Pit Bull Terrier (registered by the UKC and ADBA) and the American Staffordshire Terrier (registered by the AKC)]

There is a lot of prejudice - even hysteria - in the U.S. right now with regard to Pit Bull Terriers and other dogs like them. Our shelters - especially in urban areas - are filled with pit bulls and pit mixes. Very few of them are adoptable, and even fewer are actually adopted.  Those that are adopted are often the objects of fear and distrust. [In my experience – from a rural perspective, not urban, far more pit bulls are adoptable than not.  A great many pit bulls are social, gregarious and friendly but the lack of space in rescue organizations coupled with limited space and no-adopt policies in high kill shelters allow for far less to be saved than could be in a different world. ]

 

There are several reasons for this, but the reasons are all controversial, and your belief depends a great deal on your view about behavior - whether it's caused by nature or nurture, and whether one can modify behavior that has already been in place through late adolescence or social maturity (between 1.5-2 years). [I hedge my bets with nature.

This breed is overwhelmingly a resilient breed that can withstand the worst treatment and still come out a people loving fantastic companion dog. When you start talking about pit mixes - the waters can become very cloudy because the dog in question will have the traits of more than one breed and the mixes of these traits can have an undesirable outcome.

When discussing temperament testing results with regards to the American Pit Bull Terrier and the American Staffordshire Terrier, these breeds consistently seem to score higher than other "family friendly" breeds such as the cocker spaniel and Labrador retriever.  For more information visit the American Temperament Test Society - www.atts.org]

 

Many bully-type terriers were originally bred to fight other dogs, to bait bulls, or for other "blood" sports. [Many of our canine companions were originally bred for purposes other than strictly "as a family pet".  All dog breeds were created with a specific purpose in mind and many of popular and "non bully" breeds have a bloody history including hound dogs.] Some breeders have been assiduous in breeding out the tendencies for aggression, but others actually breed for it - and the best way to get an aggressive dog is to breed two aggressive dogs to each other.  The reasons for breeding aggression are varied - some people want their dogs to fight other dogs, some to guard their property, and some seem to want the "aura" of owning an aggressive dog.  [This is where the widespread lack of understanding of the breed has become a serious handicap to all involved.  The American Pit Bull Terrier was never meant to be a guard dog nor a dog that is aggressive to people for any reason. In fact it is quite the opposite. Pit bulls are often targets of theft because, if correct in temperament, they are incredibly people friendly and trusting of humans. Thanks lack of breed knowledge, the incorrect impression of the pit bull as a guard dog continues to be maliciously spread, to the detriment of the breed.  The true APBT is a very people soft, gregarious, easy to train dog, with tendencies for intolerance towards other animals.   This breed was never intended as a guard dog and is often the target of theft if left unattended.

The media has also played an important role in promoting the "ghetto dog" image of the American Pit Bull Terrier, which unfortunately may become a self fulfilling prophecy. More and more, people are believing the hype and aren't taking the time to understand the true nature of this breed.  This can take its toll and manifests in poor breeding practices and un-educated ownership.  I feel as though this bears repeating – The American Pit Bull Terrier was never intended as a guard dog or a protective dog.  Temperamentally sound American Pit Bull Terriers do not excel in this capacity.]

 

Dogs bred as pets for several generations tend to lose the behavior patterns that are the most problematic. Unfortunately, they are still feared because of their looks, and because many - if not most - bully dogs still retain some of their undesirable behavior patterns. [Each generation it seems has the bad dog du jour with a junkyard image, this generation is no different. Most people can remember the hysteria surrounding the German Shepherds and the Dobermans in the 70s and 80s, now the dog du jour is the "Pit Bull"]

 

Bully breeds have several desirable characteristics that build breed loyalty in their owners or guardians, such as:

  • extreme loyalty
  • affection to their owners
  • ease of training

[Also, don't forget: gregarious, people friendly, outgoing and social, athletic.  A pit bull with a correct temperament enjoys meeting people and making new friends and bonds easily with its owners.]

 

Undesirable and/or anti-social behavior patterns include:

  • The tendency to chase things that move (animals, people, etc) [All dogs are hunters and predators and most will chase things that move quickly and/or erratically, even a Labrador or other popularly viewed "family friendly" dogs.  Yes, Pit Bulls can have a high prey drive, however, there is a big difference in aggression towards animals and aggression directed towards people.  These behaviors are separate and distinct and one does NOT predispose another.   
  • The ability and tendency to bite and hold on [This is a terrier behavior, jack russels, rat terriers, west highland white, cairn, etc, etc.  The behavior is a terrier tendency and not reserved for "pit bulls" alone.  ]
  • The tendency to try and dominate other animals or people by body slamming, mounting and otherwise physically controlling them. [Most performance type breeds require a good amount of training and socialization to be happy, including many shepherd types, border collies and other working dogs.  Likewise, pit bulls need a fair amount of physical exercise and can become unruly if not provided with an outlet for their energy. However, though pit bulls can be pushy with other animals, they have been bred to be people soft!  This breed is first and foremost a people soft breed – a temperamentally sound APBT will not try to dominate his handlers. ]
  • Uncontrollable arousal or excitement  ["Uncontrollable" is a very deceptive description. We are talking about a performance breed that requires training and exercise just as many other performance breeds require training and exercise. Pit bulls do not have a tendency to re-direct aggression onto their human handlers.]

The first two undesirable characteristics can be classified as "predatory."  All dogs have some of this - some breeds more than others.  But, in most breeds and breed types, the behaviors are inhibited.  For instance, many dogs will chase runners or bicyclists, but they are unlikely to do anything if they catch up - and are easily trained out of the behavior.  Truly predatory dogs go through a fairly set series of behaviors that can end up in a serious bite or worse.  These dogs are not angry or vicious. Instead, they are obeying an instinct that was essential for hunting [The description of "truly predatory" may be accurate, but it is NOT applicable to pit bulls. More primitive breeds would be predisposed to such predatory behavior but not temperamentally sound pit bulls].  Thus, they are not likely to give any warning and the chase can be amazingly fast.  Sometimes they stalk before they chase; other times they don't [stalking before chasing is a herding dog trait: pit bulls are not herding dogs.].  A dog that bites out of fear or anger will virtually always warn its victim - it normally has no desire to bite, it just wants to be left alone [Such behavior is true of ANY dog that is in fear or in pain.  It is actually called fear aggression and is undesirable and will render a dog, ANY DOG,  un-adoptable].

Predatory attacks are very common in the bully breeds - predation is the main drive used in dog fighting, and it can be lethal.  [Which breeds are being included in the bully breed category for this handout?  Is this a general classificiation used by the uneducated – anything with a short coat and bulky body with a block head is a "bully breed"?  Let be specifically clear about what exactly we are discussing.  Some popular guarding breeds or some of the rare mastiffs have been included mistakenly in this category.  Pit bulls (specifically the American Pit Bull Terrier and American Staffordshire Terrier) can be prey driven towards small animals and aggressive towards other dogs.  At the same time this willingness to take on a challenge by another animal has been cultivated through breeding; these dogs have been bred to be easy to train, easy to handle and very people soft. ]

The third undesirable characteristic of these breeds is "dominating" or "bully" behavior. This stems from confidence. Oftentimes, confident puppies will bully their siblings, and ay take away resources (food or toys). They will do the same to members of their own human families [this has not been my experience in the 10 years I have been involved with the breed]. And, if they're successful when they're puppies, they tend to repeat the behaviors when they are grown. [Resource guarding from people is thankfully NOT a typical bully breed behavior.  It is a behavior that would/should exclude a dog from a breeding or rescue program.  In the 10 years I have been involved with rescue, I have euthanized ONE purebred American Pit Bull Terrier for resource guarding behavior.  If you interview others involved with purebred APBT rescue, you will find that resource guarding is not that common of an occurrence.]

The fourth undesirable characteristic - arousal or excitement - is actually the most problematic. Many bully dogs cannot seem to calm themselves down once they get excited. And once they get excited all their behaviors are exacerbated. Thus, if a dog is over-confident and has a tendency to body slam or mount, he or she will really crash into the other dog or person when he's aroused, sometimes inadvertently causing injury. [It isn't clear here if this is an aggression danger or a hyper dog running around and accidentally knocking someone down?  or crashing into things and other dogs in a hyper play situation?] He may begin to play-bite, and then bite harder and harder and harder. When you try to stop the behavior, the dog often becomes even more "aggressive." In this way, play can turn into aggression fairly quickly. Research on the brain [whose brain? Dogs, humans or chimps?] has shown that excited play has exactly the same chemistry as extreme anger. [citations - if heavy word like "research" are used please include references to the proper studies and science documentation] This allows a play behavior to switch quickly into aggression.  And, once the dog has become aggressive a few times, the switch is much easier. [the author seems eager to translate "reseach" into "causation" or fact.  Excited play may mimic brain chemistry but it does not mean that play causes anger]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our test includes scenarios that allow each of these behaviors to be manifested if they are there. We do not just watch the animals, nor do we try to make them aggressive. What we do is try to anticipate and replicate behavior that occurs in a normal home.

We observe the dog for a substantial amount of time to see whether he is attentive or affectionate toward us.  We then show the dog affection (petting), to see if he comes back for more. We then do something the dog is not likely to like but that will not hurt (examining the teeth and hugging).  We give the dog objects or food and then ask for it back, or we drop something and then attempt to take it.  And we play - we see if the dog retrieves and if he gives up play objects readily when he's excited. We also run around, much as a child would, to see if the dog chases and what he does when he catches up. We then wait to see how long it takes for the dog to cam down, to relax. Lastly, we introduce the dog to one or two other dogs, to see whether he is social to them.

We try to see the whole dog, as much as possible, for the safety and well being of our clients. We do not expect perfection, and will "grade" a dog for different levels of potential owners. [In other words, they do not expect their clients to have any breed specific knowledge. Purebreds were bred with specific goals in mind and understanding how those traits are expressed in the dog you own is crucial to a happy dog/owner relationship, regardless of the breed.  This knowledge also impacts methods of training that may be better suited for different breeds].  There are some behaviors that are unacceptable - mostly aggression.  If the dog is aggressive towards people in any way, he is not recommended for adoption.  In addition, dog to dog aggression is a big mark against the dog as  - especially in this country - people want their dogs to lay well with others.  [There are many breeds to that do not do well in a "dog park" setting and require more responsibility and vigilance when it comes to interactions with other animals. Unfortunately, dog owners have become selfish and lazy, wanting to satisfy their own desires of having their dog "play" with others while feeling like they are exercising or interacting with their dog. To own a purebred dog, some intelligence regarding dog behaviors and specific breed characteristics is important. Pit bulls are the most popular dog in the United States as well as the most feared and the most legislated against.  They are sadly the most misunderstood and until people take time to understand the REAL American Pit Bull Terrier, ignorance will abound with unfortunate consequences.]

Pit bulls and other bully breeds fail most often in the areas of arousal and dog-to-dog aggression. [This is also where breed understanding plays a crucial role in the success of a dog in society.  Many breeds are not successful with dog to dog interactions.  People who are looking for a generic dog and who will expect nothing from their dog, plan to learn nothing about dog behavior or dog training, and plan to take their dog to the dog park and stand around with a bunch of other people with generic dogs and no behavior knowledge, should stay away from the American Pit Bull Terrier.  The American Pit Bull Terrier is a dog that requires more from its owner, it requires an owner to understand the breed.  The rewards from the understanding will be tenfold.]

Each and every dog is tested on his own merits. We have and do put pit bulls up for adoption, after a knowledgeable person has fostered him or her for three weeks. [this is not adequate time to get to know a dog, two months is the average requirement for really truly getting to know a dog and successfully evaluating a dog's personality and adoptability].   We are cognizant of the power of this type of dog - plus many other big dogs - and would rather err on the side of caution than allow a possibly dangers dog into our neighborhoods.

Trish King

Director, Behavior & Training Dept. Marin Humane Society

[Amy Hendrickson

Annabelle's Second Chance Pit Bull Rescue

www.ascpbr.com]

For other rebuttals on this handout and breed information, please see

http://blog.myspace.com/realpitbull

www.pbrc.net

www.badrap.org

http://www.badrap.org/rescue/mhs_response.cfm

Thursday, November 23, 2006 
You want to have your buddies with you at Thanksgiving and it will be hard to resist sometimes not giving them some of the goodies but you must be careful!
  • cooked turkey meat is safe for dogs to eat, BUT items used to cook the turkey which may be tempting to dogs, such as skewers, string, pop-up timers, and roasting bags are not safe. Swallowing such things can cause an intestinal blockage or perforation.
  • No Bones - especially bird bones. All poultry bones splinter easily, and, whether splintered or whole, they can lodge inside or perforate a dog's intestines.
  • No Turkey Skin - it is extremely fatty and consuming fatty food like poultry skin can lead to gastric distress and Pancreatitis
  • No Over indulgence!- A sudden change in diet, like a big bowl of full of turkey and all the trimmings could cause an upset stomach and diahrrea. If you must share, give just a few pieces of boneless, skinless meat to their food dish.
Thursday, November 23, 2006 
Tuesday, November 14, 2006 
From the HSUS:
 

Animal fighters involved in the brutal underground industry of dogfighting and cockfighting often make thousands of dollars in a single night. But when they illegally ship animals for fighting across state lines, a misdemeanor -- essentially a slap on the wrist -- is the only penalty they will possibly face.

The law must change, and the Animal Fighting Prohibition Enforcement Act would make trafficking in fighting animals a felony, with stiffer penalties. The bill would also make it a crime to move cockfighting implements in interstate or foreign commerce. It's down to the wire for this bill, which passed the Senate unanimously but has been inexplicably bottled up in the House Judiciary Committee by Chairman James Sensenbrenner (R-WI)

Please contact House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and urge him to bring this critical legislation, H.R. 817, to the floor for an up-or-down vote immediately. The bill is supported by the American Veterinary Medical Association, National Sheriffs' Association, and more than 400 state and local law enforcement agencies. It's also co-sponsored by three quarters of the entire House, making the delay unconscionable. It's time for the House of Representatives to pass this bill