MySpace

The Toxic Reverend

Toxic Reverend an Environmental Technologist

Toxic Reverend


Last Updated: 11/28/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
State: California
Country: US
Signup Date: 4/28/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Friday, July 27, 2007 
Please forward & post to prison & mental health advocates:>

Prisons as the new mental asylums: the example of Michigan By E. Galen,  July  102007

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2007/jul2007/ment-j10.shtml

Comments posted at the story link, too. The above activist web site has millions of members .......

Also see the report :>
"Are they dysfunctional homeless or toxic victims" ?

http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/dfhtv.html
The above story is titled from a quote from Gavin Newsom, Mayor of San Francisco speaking at a "Homeless Connect" meeting.

Ironically enough, San Francisco has been chasing the homeless out of their city (see the"A Dream Denied"report). The homeless then flee to neighboring communities. Of whom then pass similar laws to harass the homeless, as reported by the Press Democrat newspaper (htm45).

The San Francisco Chronicle newspaper ran a story that stated, "general assistance rolls for the homeless have been slashed by 73 percent -..." (hrm60) forcing other cities to pass laws against homelessness to divert the onslaught of those fleeing places like San Francisco and Sonoma County (htm45).

You might ask yourself if maybe they are "mentally ill, toxic
victims that might have committed a crime because they are toxic" ?

Press Democrat newspaper story about myself is posted,
after my response to their slanted article at
http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/rasb.html

Blessings,

TR

The Toxic Reverend


Peer Reviewed Medical Journal on Chronic
Illnesses and Stealth Infections from
Bio-weapons www.immed.org
Note:
The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
What you do not know could kill you
http://www.gulfwarvets.com

Friday, July 20, 2007 
Copy / paste of an e-mail sent


To:
Participate.net 
the official social action network for the
Alliance for Climate Protection,
Partnered with Al Gore's Live Earth concert series for climate change.
Blogs for,"Inconvenient Truth" and "Fast Food Nation"
http://www.participate.net/

Cc: David Michaels, PhD,
Bcc: Please forward and post.

Note that the comment I posted at the Pump Handle blog is
awaiting moderator approval,
and is attached. Moderator
approval might be a method to help defend against the spam
attacks at the various Campaign blogs. I was also wondering
if a Campaign Blog for the Live Earth Concerts was in the works
or if the "Inconvenient Truth Campaign Blog" was it ?


Now posted at the Pump Handle Blog:>

"FEMA Attorneys: Don't Test for Toxics" by David Michaels
A Washington Post article reveals FEMA's shameful response to word that their
trailers might have been exposing resident to dangerous levels of formaldehyde.
http://thepumphandle.wordpress.com/2007/07/19/fema-attorneys-don%e2%80%99t-test-for-toxics/

Excerpt:

Spencer S. Hsu of the Washington Post reports that:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency has suppressed warnings from
its own Gulf coast field workers since the middle of 2006 about suspected health
problems that may be linked to elevated levels of formaldehyde gas released in
FEMA-provided trailers, lawmakers said today.

At a hearing this morning of the House Oversight and Government Reform
Committee, investigators released internal e-mails indicating that FEMA lawyers
rejected environmental testing out of fear that the agency would then become
legally liable if health problems emerged among as many as 120,000 families
displaced by Hurricane Katrina who lived in trailers. 

FEMA's Office of General Counsel "has advised that we do not do testing,"
because this "would imply FEMA's ownership of this issue," wrote a FEMA
logistics specialist on June 16, 2006, three months after news reports surfaced
about the possible effects of the invisible cancer-causing compound and one
month after the agency was sued.

Another FEMA attorney on June 15 advised, "[d]o not initiate any testing until we
give the OK. . . . Once you get results and should they indicate some problem, the
clock is running on our duty to respond to them."

Nearly 5,000 pages of documents turned over to the committee "expose an
official policy of premeditated ignorance," the Committee Chairman,
Congressman Henry] Waxman charged., "Senior officials in Washington
didn't want to know what
they already knew, because they didn't want
the legal and moral responsibility
to do what they knew had to be done."

.......

David Michaels heads the Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy (SKAPP)
and is Professor and Associate Chairman in the Department of Environmental and
Occupational Health, the George Washington University School of Public Health and
Health Services.


_________________________________

After posting a comment, their blog page said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.

My posting / comment was:>

Actually, a "basic manual" for the Earth Liberation Front
(of which was declared a Domestic Terrorist Group by
President Bush) has been a book titled "Toxic Deception".
It was written by four toxicologists and exposes the fraudulent
toxic chemical testing from industry that has gone on for decades.
One of the chemicals discussed is formaldehdyde and it's
association with asthma. The Sick Building Syndrome web site
that I had posted the information at connecting the formaldehdyde
exposures with sub-clinical (Stealth) mycoplasma
infections was taken down from the Internet. The free
Angelfire web site provider would only say that I had "violated"
some clauss and would not specify which one. And the web site
was also "censored" from the Archive Way Back Machine to
2005, with the last two years and the asthma pages, gone.

How ever, peer reviewed medical journal articles with
"Treatment Considerations" of mycoplasma infections and
toxic chemical exposures can be found at www.immed.org

A book review on "Toxic Deception":
How the Chemical Industry Manipulates Science, Bends the
Law and Endangers Your Health. 2nd ed. Dan Fagin,
Marianne Lavelle, and the Center for Public Integrity.
1999. 250 pp.
ABSTRACTS OF NEW BOOKS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH,
American Journal of Public Health, Jul99, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p1120, 2p.

A copy of the American Journal of Public Health book review
of "Toxic Deception" is posted at :>
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/td.htm

Blessings,

The Toxic Reverend
MySpace Blog
http://blog.myspace.com/toxicreverend

Who's a criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverendl

Homicide Charges For Corporations
(ten convictions, rough draft posted)
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime



---- End Of Forwarded Message -----

Regards,


The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
A Problem Becoming A Solution
http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/parkh.html


The Gospel of Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" was posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
This page has been censored and removed from the
Archives "Way Back Machine" to 2005.  Trying to find a
server to re-post this censored information.
Could use some editing help too.
http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/tr.html


Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com
Monday, July 16, 2007 
Database summarizes between chemical contaminants
and approximately 180 human diseases or conditions. 
Type in an illness and the database tells you which toxic
chemicals are associated with it.
http://database.healthandenvironment.org

   The database is a work in progress.  Many of the members
of this project are with
 the Breast Cancer Fund
www.breastcancerfund.org

Evaluate all products in your home for the potential of toxic
chemical exposures, using the
Household Products Database.
www.householdproducts.nlm.nih.gov/products.htm

A book titled "Diet For A New America" exposes meat and
dairy products as leading sources of exposure.  It was written
by the heir to the Baskin Robbins Ice cream Empire,
John Robbins. Of whom also started, 
"Earth Save" www.earthsave.org

Toxic chemicals being disposed of as fertilizer and the plants
absorb it (including "organic").  Legislation passed to make it
legal. Book title "Fateful Harvest" ,by Duff Wilson.
Book review;
Magazine: MOTHER JONES; SEPTEMBER 01, 2001 
Section: Media Jones book review,
A DIRTY SECRET - Fateful Harvest
  http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/fate.html  


PESTICIDES, FOODS, AND YOU,
Magazine: Consumer Reports; March 01, 2001,
Section: TEST INFORM PROTECT
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/pfyecr.html




The 10 most dangerous toxins in your house
,
Thursday, January 14, 1999 By Claude Morgan
(Claude Morgan is a freelance writer based in Maine who
contributes to E, the Environmental Magazine.)
 The Los Angeles Times Syndicate,
All Rights Reserved
This is posted for educational and research purposes.
Copyright laws still apply.
Please note the "fair use statement.
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/com10.html



One of the best references is to subscribe to "
Green Tips" from
the Union Of Concerned Scientists www.ucsusa.org

--------

GreenTips Home (Index)

Greentips, from the Union of Concerned Scientists, is
a monthly electronic newsletter and web feature with tips
for incorporating environmentally friendly ...

www.ucsusa.org/publications/greentips/ - 34k - May 17, 2007
-----------

Note the "GreenTips Archive"

Housecleaning Made Easier (9/05)

The Dangers of Modern Art (3/05)

Green Foods (We're Not Just Talking Vegetables) (7/05)

End of examples from
" Green Tips Archive"

_________

One of the best book is "Our Stolen Future",
web page at
http://www.ourstolenfuture.org
Our Stolen Future New insights from scientific research,
Low dose effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NewScience/lowdose/lowdose.htm


_______

Another book titled,
Toxic Deception:
How the Chemical Industry Manipulates Science, Bends
the Law and Endangers Your Health. 2nd ed. Dan Fagin,
Marianne
Lavelle, and the Center for Public Integrity. 1999. 250 pp. ABSTRACTS - review OF NEW BOOKS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH,
American Journal of Public Health,
Jul99, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p1120, 2p.
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/td.html



Title:
Scientists claim President Bush bends data, Distortions are said to serve policy goals .
by James Glanz  The International Herald Tribune
02-18-2004  www.iht.com

Excerpt from article;
More than 60 influential scientists, including 20 Nobel
laureates
, have issued a statement asserting that the Bush
administration has systematically distorted scientific fact
in the service of policy goals on the environment, health,
biomedical research and nuclear weapons at home and
abroad.

End of excerpt from;
The International Herald Tribune 02-18-2004
www.iht.com

______

Note that
cleaning plastic can cause a very toxic
chemical reaction. Explained and
..ed by a Case Western Reserve
University researcher in the article :>

Protecting Yourself From Unsafe Plastics, 
By Sharon Levy
National Wildlife Magazine,
FebruaryMarch issue, Vol.42, No.2

http://www.nwf.org/nationalwildlife/article.cfm?articleId=890&issueId=66


____


__

26 Trade Secrets,
Web page from Bill Moyers Public Broadcasting show, national television.
..ation of 50 years of corporate cover up. Bull Moyers
was tested for over 800 chemicals. They found over 80. That
creates more viable chemical reactions in one patient than the California pick six lotto. In many instances, chemicals multiply in toxicity, rather than add, when mixed (16, 17). The correct tests must be used (
12A).
http://www.pbs.org/tradesecrets/index.html

Our Stolen Future New insights from scientific research,
Low dose effects of endocrine disrupting chemicals http://www.ourstolenfuture.org/NewScience/lowdose/lowdose.htm


________________

Google search term: "toxic food".

Source: *(food);

Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine,
Mar96, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p55, 70p, 58 charts,
2 diagrams, 17 graphs, 2bw.
HERBICIDES -- Health aspects; PESTICIDES -- Physiological effect
Pesticides, ("X-rays can enhance the action of the toxic chemicals", use "find in page" under the Edit for "radiation "), http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/pestherb.html

______

Troubling chemicals detected in people,
by Daniel P. Jones , The Hartford Courant ,
Published by The Seattle Times  Newspaper
Saturday, August 26, 2000 ,
CDC researcher quoted as saying,
"Main source of exposure is "food".

________________________________


Big health risk seen in some laser printers
Jane Kay, San Francisco Chronicle, 08/01/07
.. 08/01/2007 04:00:00 score=1000, len=0009060
$ body_summary -->
        If you work near certain models of laser printers, you might be breathing the same amount of ultra-fine
particle pollution as if a smoker were puffing away
in the next cubicle ....
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/08/01/MNFBRAN0J2.DTL&hw=laser&sn=001&sc=1000

Excerpts; (with links to report added):

Almost half of the laser printers tested in the study emitted
tiny particles of toner-like material, sending out concentrations ranging from low to high, according to
 the study findings published  online today for the American Chemical Society's journal
Environmental Science and Technology.

http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2007/aug/science/nl_printers.html

Breathing tiny particles can cause respiratory irritation and  more severe illnesses such as heart disease and cancer.



End of excerpts.



Blessings,

The Toxic Reverend

Who's a  criminal ?
http://blog.myspace.com/toxicreverend
Saturday, July 14, 2007 

Please see the attached forwarded LA Times news
paper story that declares the vast majority of breast
cancers are due to toxic environmental exposures.
And  that genetics play a much smaller role than
previously thought.  My thoughts are that the issue
of genetics in various diseases is still "misconstrued".

There is a lot of reference material with regard to the
common sources of toxic chemical exposures, on this blog, too. One interview with the EPA says over 70% of exposures are from indoor air polution in our own homes. But another article (reference 144 in a prior blog) interviews a CDC researcher that say's food is the main source of exposure.  A book titled "Diet For A New America" won a Pulitzer Prize and exposed dairy products and meat as being major sources of pesticide exposures.  Many "Environmental Doctors agree with food being the number one source of exposure.  Another book titled, "Fateful Harvest" exposes toxic chemicals being disposed of in fertilizer and and used with even "organic food".  (Baby Green Organic lettuce had the highest levels of perchlorate of all the foods tested).  In prior blogs, I give reference material on medical X-rays increasing the toxicity of toxic chemicals and that X-rays are associated with over 70% of the cases of breast cancer.

I have added some  information to be aware of
  the genetic testing for the ability to detoxify, such

as whar is called APOe.

Carbon Based Corporation
(Genetic testing for detoxification proficiency)
http://www.carbonbased.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=84">
http://www.carbonbased.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=84


"Although virtually all women are exposed to the
chemicals, some may be more susceptible because
of differing metabolism or ability to repair DNA".

End of excerpt.


I would add to that, "the genetic pairing that influences
the immune systems ability to detoxify" , as described at:

Coffee and Genetics - Pat Sullivan Blog
Mark Schauss is an expert on medical testing and
research. ...does the genetic pairing tests for mercury detox
Comment Posted by: Toxic Reverend |
Oct 18, 2006 2:46:57 AM. Post a comment ...--
http://www.patsullivan.com/blog/2006/03/coffee_and_gene.html
I had posted a more in depth comment at the above blog.

   It is my opinion as an Environmental Technologist that this
APOe ( aka Apolipoprotein E)
is just as applicable to Breast Cancer as it is to cardiovascular
problems, macular degeneration, and mental illnesses (to name a few).

In some of the other blogs, I give reports that show medical x-rays can multiply the toxic impact of toxic chemicals and give reference material for 70& of the breast cancer cases being associated with medical x-rays, because of that.


TR



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice is Homeless
Date: Jun 4, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: Common chemicals linked to breast cancer
To: Toxic Reverend


..>..>..>..>..>..>
Excerpts from the attached LA Times newspaper article:

In response to the findings, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a breast cancer prevention group that funded the work, pledged an additional $5 million for developing research tools to root out environmental causes.....

...because the disease is so common and the chemicals so widespread, "the public health impacts of reducing exposures would be profound even if the true relative risks are modest," they wrote. "If even a small percentage is due to preventable environmental factors, modifying these factors would spare thousands of women."


End of excerpts.




Please note the fair use statement after this copyrighted article.

 
..>..>..>..>..>..>

Common chemicals are linked to breast cancer

Of the 216 compounds, many in the air, food or everyday items.
By, Marla Cone,  , Times Staff Writer
May 14, 2007

..>..>..>..>..>..>
Related Stories
-Chemical carcinogens
-Despite cancer, many keep careers healthy

The reports are at http://www.silentspring.org/sciencereview .




More than 200 chemicals — many found in urban air and everyday consumer products — cause breast cancer in animal tests, according to a compilation of scientific reports published today.

Writing in a publication of the American Cancer Society, researchers concluded that reducing exposure to the compounds could prevent many women from developing the disease.

The research team from five institutions analyzed a growing body of evidence linking environmental contaminants to breast cancer, the leading killer of U.S. women in their late 30s to early 50s.

Experts say that family history and genes are responsible for a small percentage of breast cancer cases but that environmental or lifestyle factors such as diet are probably involved in the vast majority.

"Overall, exposure to mammary gland carcinogens is widespread," the researchers wrote in a special supplement to the journal Cancer. "These compounds are widely detected in human tissues and in environments, such as homes, where women spend time."

The scientists said data were too incomplete to estimate how many breast cancer cases might be linked to chemical exposures.

But because the disease is so common and the chemicals so widespread, "the public health impacts of reducing exposures would be profound even if the true relative risks are modest," they wrote. "If even a small percentage is due to preventable environmental factors, modifying these factors would spare thousands of women."

The three reports and a commentary were compiled by researchers from the Silent Spring Institute, http://www.silentspring.org/
 a women's environmental health organization in Newton, Mass.; Harvard's Medical School and School of Public Health in Boston; the Roswell Park Cancer Institute in Buffalo, N.Y.; and USC's Keck School of Medicine. Silent Spring Institute Executive Director Julia Brody led the team.

In response to the findings, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, a breast cancer prevention group that funded the work, pledged an additional $5 million for developing research tools to root out environmental causes.

Reviewing hundreds of existing studies and databases, the team produced what it called "the most comprehensive compilation to date of chemicals identified as mammary carcinogens." No new chemical testing was conducted for the reports.

The researchers named 216 chemicals that induce breast tumors in animals. Of those, people are highly exposed to 97, including industrial solvents, pesticides, dyes, gasoline and diesel exhaust compounds, cosmetics ingredients, hormones, pharmaceuticals, radiation, and a chemical in chlorinated drinking water.

"Almost all of the chemicals were mutagenic, and most caused tumors in multiple organs and species; these characteristics are generally thought to indicate likely carcinogenicity in humans, even at lower exposure levels," they reported.

For many of the compounds, the federal government has not used animal breast cancer data when conducting human risk assessments, which are the first step toward regulating chemicals or in setting occupational standards to protect workers. Companies are not required to screen women who work with the chemicals for breast cancer.

"Regulators have not paid much attention to potential mammary carcinogens," the researchers wrote.

Toxicologists say that other mammals, such as rats and mice, often develop the same tumors as humans do, and that animal tests are efficient means of testing the effects of chemicals. Environmental regulators, however, often want conclusive human data before taking action.

Animal studies generally use high doses of a substance to simulate a lifetime of exposure, and then the results are extrapolated to the lower levels that people are exposed to.

Ana Soto, a Tufts University professor of cell biology who specializes in cellular origins of cancer and effects of hormone-disrupting contaminants, said there probably was a link between breast cancer and exposures to chemicals in the environment, particularly early in life.

"I cannot say I'm convinced, but what I can say is that it's a very likely, very plausible hypothesis," said Soto, who did not participate in the new research. "More and more, cancer looks like an environmental disease."

Twenty-nine of the chemicals are produced in volumes exceeding 1 million pounds annually in the United States.

Seventy-three are present in consumer products or are food contaminants — 1,4-dioxane in shampoos, for example, or acrylamide in French fries. Thirty-five are common air pollutants, 25 are in workplaces where at least 5,000 women are employed, and 10 are food additives, according to the reports.

There are probably many more than 216, the research team said, because only about 1,000 of the 80,000 chemicals registered for use in the United States have been tested on animals to see whether they induce cancerous tumors or mutate DNA. Such tests cost $2 million each.

Because epidemiological studies are difficult to conduct and full of uncertainties, human data are "still relatively sparse," the researchers wrote. Only 152 studies worldwide have examined whether women exposed to contaminants are more likely to have breast cancer — compared with nearly 1,500 that have explored the links between diet and the disease — and most of the 216 carcinogens were not included.

"Despite this large remaining gap, research in the last five years has strengthened the human evidence that environmental pollutants play a role in breast cancer risk," the researchers wrote. They said the existing studies suggested "substantial public health impact."

Human evidence is particularly strong for PCBs, or polychlorinated biphenyls — compounds widely used in the 1940s to late 1970s that still contaminate fish and other foods — and for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, found in diesel and gasoline exhaust.

Solvents in dry cleaning, aircraft maintenance and other jobs also may increase breast cancer risk.

Some of the chemicals named as breast carcinogens already are regulated to protect public health, but some, particularly those in consumer products, are not.

The scientists conducted the review hoping to lay the groundwork for new human studies, as well as to persuade regulators to use existing animal data to strengthen regulations and require more testing of chemicals.

"Animal models are the primary means of understanding and anticipating effects of chemicals in humans," they wrote. "All known human carcinogens … are also carcinogenic in animals."

Emerging evidence suggests that the roots of breast cancer are in infancy or the womb. More animal and human research should focus on such early exposure, said Patricia Hunt, a Washington State University School of Molecular Biosciences professor.

But Hunt and Soto urged society not to wait for scientific proof to reduce exposure to the chemicals.

"When you look at their list of chemicals, we are exposed to all of it," Soto said. "We know humans are exposed to mixtures, and studying mixtures is very difficult. We will never have the whole picture, and it will take many, many years to collect epidemiological evidence, so we should take some preventive measures now."

Although virtually all women are exposed to the chemicals, some may be more susceptible because of differing metabolism or ability to repair DNA.

Breast cancer is probably triggered by an interaction of multiple environmental and genetic factors.

Experts have long suspected diet plays a role. But the new research found "no association that is consistent, strong and statistically significant" for any particular foods raising or reducing breast cancer risk. There is substantial evidence, however, that regularly consuming alcohol, being obese and being sedentary increase risk.

About 178,000 new cases will be diagnosed this year in the United States.

The reports are at http://www.silentspring.org/sciencereview .



___________


Chemical carcinogens

Researchers name 216 chemicals that cause breast cancer in animal tests. Here are some of the most widespread:

..>..>..>..>..>..>
ChemicalSource/use
1,4-dioxaneDetergents, shampoos, soaps
1,3-butadiene Common air pollutant; found in vehicle exhaust
Acrylamide Fried foods
Benzene Common air pollutant; found in vehicle exhaust
Perfluorooctanoic acid Used in manufacture of Teflon
Styrene Used in manufacture of plastics; found in carpets, adhesives, hobby supplies and other consumer products
Vinyl chloride Used almost exclusively by the plastics industry to make vinyl
1,1-dichloroethane Industrial solvent; also found in some consumer products such as paint removers
Toluene diisocyanate Used in foam cushions, furnishings, bedding
Methylene chloride Used in furniture polish, fabric cleaners, wood sealants and many other consumer products
PAHs Diesel and gasoline exhaust
PCBs Electrical transformers; banned but still in environment
Atrazine Widely used herbicide, particularly for corn


Source: Silent Spring Institute






..>..>..>..>..>..>
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
..>..>..>..>..>..>
Please forward and post
Blessings,
The Toxic Reverend
 
No More Red Collar Crime
Criminal Charges Against Corporations
www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime
 
Who are the criminals ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend


"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com
No More Red Collar Crime
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime
NOTICE: The National Security  Agency may have read
this email without warning, warrant, or notice.
Tuesday, July 10, 2007 
A partial reference list of similar stories, such as the attached
forwarded e-mail, is given after the fwd.

TR

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice is Homeless
Date: Jul 9, 2007 5:31 PM
Subject: EPA WARNS; YOU'RE MUCH CLOSER TO SOURCES OF INDOOR POLLUTION
To: Toxic Reverend

Please note the fair use statement after this copyrighted article.
Important notes and links given after the article.


..>..>

..>..>
YOU'RE MUCH CLOSER TO SOURCES OF INDOOR POLLUTION, EPA WARNS; [FINAL Edition]
MAX GATES. Seattle Times. Seattle, Wash.: Oct 2, 1989.  pg. C.8
..> ..> ..>..>
Author(s): MAX GATES
Dateline: ANNAPOLIS, MD.
Section: SCENE
Publication title: Seattle Times. Seattle, Wash.: Oct 2, 1989.  pg. C.8
Source type: Newspaper




Text Word Count 763

Abstract:

While major pollution-control efforts have focused on industry and automobiles, three-quarters of the typical American's exposure to toxic chemicals occurs indoors, according to a federal Environmental Protection Agency scientist.
And because much of the indoor exposure results from everyday tasks, done at home and ``close to your nose,'' Americans can take some simple steps to minimize their exposure to potentially harmful chemicals, says Lance Wallace, who has been sampling indoor pollution in homes across the country for the past decade.
``We've found that consumer products and personal activities are the major sources of exposure,'' Wallace told a recent meeting of the American Lung Association in Annapolis. ``The traditional (toxic) sites that EPA has worried about were not very important in exposure.''
 
____________________________________

Full text of article:
 
Copyright Seattle Times Oct 2, 1989
 
ANNAPOLIS, Md. - The foam pillow you sleep on could be hazardous to your health.
 
So could a freshly dry-cleaned suit, a morning shower and the air freshener that scents the room.
 
While major pollution-control efforts have focused on industry and automobiles, three-quarters of the typical American's exposure to toxic chemicals occurs indoors, according to a federal Environmental Protection Agency scientist.
 
And because much of the indoor exposure results from everyday tasks, done at home and ``close to your nose,'' Americans can take some simple steps to minimize their exposure to potentially harmful chemicals, says Lance Wallace, who has been sampling indoor pollution in homes across the country for the past decade.
 
``We've found that consumer products and personal activities are the major sources of exposure,'' Wallace told a recent meeting of the American Lung Association in Annapolis. ``The traditional (toxic) sites that EPA has worried about were not very important in exposure.''
 
Wallace doesn't argue that efforts to clean up outdoor air are pointless. Air pollutants such as ozone, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides can damage the environment and pose a direct threat to the health of people with lung diseases such as asthma and emphysema.
 
But, while most of the toxic emissions occur outdoors, most of the actual exposure of Americans to toxic chemicals occurs inside, he said.
 
``The average American spends only 4 percent of his time outdoors,'' Wallace said. ``We don't spend much time on the tops of buildings or in intersections where pollution measurements are taken.''
 
Wallace and his EPA colleagues found, for example, that while automobiles produce 82 percent of toxic emissions, they result in just 18 percent of humans' exposure to toxic chemicals. Industry produces 14 percent of emissions, but just 3 percent of exposures.
 
On the other hand, cigarettes account for 0.1 percent of toxic emissions in the country but produce 39 percent of humans' exposure to toxic chemicals. The exposure to toxic chemicals from smoking by others exceeds that from industrial pollutants, Wallace said.
 
Wallace began his studies 10 years ago in two areas of the country with the worst reputations for air pollution - Los Angeles and northern New Jersey. The EPA team sampled air inside and outside homes, then tested the breath of residents to determine what chemicals they had been exposed to.
 
``All 11 chemicals that we looked at were at much higher exposures - two to five times higher - in homes as outdoors,'' he said. ``And remember, this was outdoors in New Jersey.''
 
The work since has been expanded to more than a dozen cities across the country. ``In every city, in every season, the indoor exposures are greater than outdoor sources,'' Wallace said.
 
``This explains why no one ever steps inside for a breath of fresh air,'' he said.
 
Among the chemicals of concern were:
 
-- Benzene, known to cause leukemia in humans, was traced to cigarette smoking, automobile travel, pumping gas and vapors from attached garages. ``Smokers had a good deal more of everything in their breath,'' Wallace said.
 
-- Para-dichlorobenzene, linked to cancer in animals, is present in air fresheners, moth crystals and restroom disinfectants. High levels can persist for years in some homes.
 
-- Chloroform, also an animal carcinogen, is released from water during hot showers and clothes- and dish-washing. ``Half the chloroform comes out before the water hits the tub, and 10 minutes in the shower can expose the rest of the family to chloroform for up to two hours,'' he said, recommending that bathrooms be properly vented to reduce exposure.
 
-- Tetrachloroethylene, another animal carcinogen, is now the chemical of choice for dry cleaning, replacing the now-banned carbon tetrachloride. Newly dry-cleaned clothes can emit tetrachloroethylene for seven to 10 days. ``In our tests, 37 people who had gone to the dry cleaners had twice the amount of tetracholoroethlylene in their breath,'' Wallace said. Hanging dry-cleaned clothes outside for a day ``will save 20-30 percent of the exposure,'' he said.
 
Many sources of indoor pollution can be removed or controlled, and there are other steps homeowners can take to reduce exposure.
 
NASA scientists said this week that several varieties of common house plants remove common pollutants from the air: Philodendrons, spider plants and golden pothos take out formaldehyde; flowering plants such as gerbera daisies and chrysanthemums remove benzene; bamboo palms, peace lilies, ficus, mass cane, mother-in-law's tongue, English ivy and Chinese evergreen also can help with indoor pollution.
 
Wallace said equipment such as electrostatic precipitators and negative ion generators are helpful in removing some pollutants, but tend to be expensive and only partially effective.
 
_____________
 
Important notes and reference links:
 
Reference notes from The Toxic Reverend &
 
Using Plants to Root Out Indoor Pollutionm
newspaper; Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles, Calif.: Feb 21, 1998.  pg. 1
_________
Caution: The humidity must be well maintained or the plants can also cause mold to grow.  Mold has been associated with asthma, as has formaldehyde.
 
Mold has been shown to harbor mycoplasma's (an infectious "Incapacitating Agent" that is actually a type of
"Non-Lethal" Biological Weapon), as hjave ticks with Lymes Disease and most likeley "Dust Mites". "Mold Mycoplasma" is a good serach term to compare to "mold asthma". 
 
 Peer reviewed medical journal articles about such biological weapons,mycoplasma infections and treatments can be found at www.immed.org
ALSO NOTE:
The Gulf War Vets have posted,
"Beyond Treason"; What you do not know about our governments medical research could kill you, at www.gulfwarvets.com
 
A book titled, " 81: Toxic Deception" was  written by four toxicologists and documents the cover up of the toxic effects of formaldehyde, , with fraudulently produced toxicology reports that were given to government agencies book cites some of the court cases ).
 
81: Toxic Deception: How the Chemical Industry Manipulates Science, Bends the Law and Endangers Your Health. 2nd ed. Dan Fagin, Marianne Lavelle, and the Center for Public Integrity. 1999. 250 pp. ISBN 1567511627 ABSTRACTS OF NEW BOOKS ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, American Journal of Public Health, Jul99, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p1120, 2p. http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/td.html



..> ..> ..>..>
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S. C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
..> ..> ..>..>
Please forward and post
Blessings,
 
No More Red Collar Crime
Criminal Charges Against Corporations
 
Who are the criminals ?


"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com
No More Red Collar Crime
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime
NOTICE: The National Security  Agency may have read
this email without warning, warrant, or notice.

--
---- End Of Forwarded Message -----

6: The 10 most dangerous toxins in your house,

Thursday, January 14, 1999
By Claude Morgan (Claude Morgan is a freelance writer
based in Maine who contributes to E, the Environmental Magazine.)
Copyright 1997, The Los Angeles Times Syndicate,
All Rights Reserved This is posted for educational and
research purposes. Copyright laws still apply. http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/com10.html



Troubling chemicals detected in people

by Daniel P. Jones, The Hartford Courant
CDC researchers say's;

"The
most common source of exposure is FOOD"

Copyright
2000 The Seattle Times Company
Posted at 12:00 a.m. Pacific; Saturday, August 26, 2000

http://web.archive.org/web/20020204050739/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/nation-world/html98/altchem26_20000826.html



Protecting Yourself From Unsafe Plastics,
By Sharon Levy

A Case Western Reserve University researcher say's;

"Detergents cause a chemical reactions causing plastics
to become very toxic"

National Wildlife Magazine, FebruaryMarch issue, Vol.42, No.2

http://www.nwf.org/nationalwildlife/article.cfm?articleId=890&issueId=66
20: The "Dangers of Challenging Chemical Companies", Section: BITS &PIECES, Mother Earth News, Jun/Jul97 Issue 162, p12, 2p, 1c.
 http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/dccc.html

157: POISON FOR PROFIT CHEM/PHARM HAS NO EQUAL - WHAT A BUSINESS PLAN!
By Ashley Simmons Hotz May 15, 2002
The huge transnational companies that produce toxic
chemicals found in pesticides, herbicides and industrial
and household products profit not only from the sale of
these products, but also from the symptoms and chronic
illnesses that they can trigger.
http://www.redflagsweekly.com/storm_warnings/poison.html




158: The Age of Inequality,
Leading medical providers like the Cleveland Clinic and
Johns Hopkins in Baltimore are establishing special
programs to give platinum service to the well-heeled.
Depending on the program, the super-rich customers may
receive massages and sauna time along with their physical,
housecalls, and step-to-the-front-of-the-line service in testing
facilities.

http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/corp-focus/2002/000116.html



157h: Defrauding America
Site for Providing Accurate Insider Information on
Corruption in the Three Branches of Government
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/


157a : U.S. Lags in Toxicity Testing,
Wednesday, May 3, 2000, Los Angeles Times
Congressional study reviewed more than 1,400 chemicals
that pose potential threats to human health and found
that only 6% are being tracked by HHS and the EPA.
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/lack.html




108: The Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Cancer, By Don Benjamin. http://www.webone.com.au/~maxwell/ciss/documents/chemo2.html


105: Chemotherapy Report – ...
26, 128-47. Moore, MJ, Tannock, IF.
How expert physicians would wish to be treated if they developed
genito-urinary cancer.
Abstract No. 455.
Proceedins of the. American. Society of Cancer Oncologists.


98 Sample of public library search in National periodical and newspaper search engine
before "the Patriot Act & it's censoreship".
Search term "toxic health" http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/pesbr.html

127: The Right to Know, Left to Wonder http://www.mapcruzin.com/right-to-know-issues.htm

130: Guest Essay: Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) versus CLIA, by Dr. Janine Denis Cook, Ph.D. DABCC
Department of Medical and Research Technology, School of Medicine University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD
"In the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's, Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories (IBT) performed about 35-40% of all U.S. toxicology testing. Of the 867 audits of IBT performed by the FDA under the 1962 law, 618 were found to be invalid because of numerous discrepancies between the study conduct and data. FDA flexed its muscles and found four IBT managers guilty of fraud". http://www.westgard.com/guest16.htm

131: S/R 7/8: Pandora's Poison (by Eric Coppolino) from Sierra magazine, September/October, 1994.
. through our own research laboratories to find one.". ... highly toxic," Monsanto engaged
Industrial Bio-Test (IBT) Labs, of multiple counts of fraud in .http://www.greens.org/s-r/078/07-50.html

132: Registering Pesticides No Guarantee of Safety.... would not occur in the future. 38 However, test fraud again made headlines in 1994, when Craven Laboratories was fined over 15 million dollars and its ... Fifty Years of Legislation, by CAROLINE COX
http://www.getipm.com/government/pesticide-registration.htm


136: USDA acknowledges it should coordinate its review
process for
herbicide-tolerant crops with EPA, and says a draft plan is under review. Jim
Rogers, 301-734-8563, jim.d.rogers@aphis.usda.gov,

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/biotech/mou1.html
But it is well documented in the book "Toxic Deception (
81)

that they have known this since the 1970's. So do not hold
your breath waiting for things to change.
Central back up copy
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/rf.html



137
: Various search results of "toxic fraud", "fraud craven", "Industrial Bio-Test", more to come, will be updating - http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/crtf.html


Book title; "When Healing Becomes a Crime"
Kenny Ausubel is the founder of the annual Bioneers
conference
(www.bioneers.org) and the author most
recently of When Healing Becomes a Crime (Inner
Traditions, 2000) based on his award-winning documentary,
Hoxsey (1987). (c) 2001.



Regards,

The Toxic Reverend
Who's a  criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend

Homicide Charges For Corporations
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime


The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
A Problem Becoming A Solution
http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/parkh.html


The Gospel of Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" was posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
This page has been censored and removed from the
Archives "Way Back Machine" to 2005.  Trying to find a
server to re-post this censored information.
Could use some editing help too.
http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/tr.html


Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com
Saturday, July 07, 2007 
Here is an education that you will not get from a newspaper
or school of any kind:> 
"Censored Information on Health Care"
from the Breast Cancer Fund

More in depth information and links are posted
after their e-mail alert advising woman to count the number of X-rays they get because the X-rays contribute to breast cancer.

Just "connect the dots".

 In short, medical studies have been "skewed" with incomplete information.
Try a Google on "tobacco radiation" and "tobacco pesticide regulations".
You will find  a number of good investigative journalist reports from verifiable
news sources showing that tobacco smoke is full of radioactive pesticides (nerve gas). 
While a
Congressional Report   have proven that less than 6% of the know cancer
causing chemicals are tracked in cancer cases. The medical studies have been
"skewed" with incomplete information as it relates to X-rays and breast cancer
and the impact of Depleted Uranium with the Gulf War Vets of whom have posted a
DVD titled "Beyond Treason" about that subject. And while most American's are
unaware of the numerous radioactive "hot spots" in America, our government continues
to release radioactive DU on unsuspecting cities. Such as the San Francisco area,
reported another censored article;
More lies from Livermore nuclear weapons lab
by Bob Nichols, Project Censored Award Winner
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/05/12/18415015.php


 

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Breast Cancer Fund
Date: Jul 5, 2007 7:02 AM
Subject: Protect Science from Industry Influence
To: Toxic Reverend toxicreverend@...

..>..>..>..>..>..> ..> ..>

If you are unable to view this message, go to breastcancerfund.org/july2007 »

..>..>..>..>..>..> ..> ..>

July 2007

Forward to a Friend
Not a subscriber yet? Click here »
..>..>..>..>..>..> ..> ..>
Take Action

Follow the Funding
Bisphenol A, a chemical used in hard plastic water bottles, baby bottles and canned food, has inspired the latest and loudest debate about bias in toxicity research. Many scientific studies show it's a powerful hormone-disruptor linked to breast cancer, but studies funded by the chemical industry say it's harmless.

This biased science is showing up in a report issued by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Now the study director is positioned to either ignore the money trail or apply a consistent, unbiased assessment of the science.

Ask for a transparent report on BPA and health »

Share this action with athletes, new parents and others exposed to BPA »

News and Updates

Record High Exposures to Ionizing Radiation
More Americans are being exposed to record amounts of ionizing radiation, according to a new study by the National Council on Radiation Protection. The study also found that the number of CT scans, which expose patients to more radiation than an X-ray, jumped from 3 million in 1980 to 62 million in 2006.

Ionizing radiation, whose sources include X-rays, CT scans and fluoroscopy, is the best- and longest-established environmental cause of human breast cancer in both women and men.

Radiologists urge patients and doctors to weigh the benefits and risks of each scan or exam, and to keep a cumulative record of them. Patients should also look for a facility accredited by the American College of Radiology, which adheres to high safety and quality standards.

Read more from the New York Times »

Learn about the Breast Cancer Fund's efforts to make radiation safer »


Starbucks Responds to You
Hours after Breast Cancer Fund members began e-mailing Starbucks last month asking for hormone-free dairy, the coffee company called and sent us a written statement that it is working to achieve 100 percent hormone-free dairy in all its U.S. stores by the end of 2007. Thanks to the work of consumer activists over the last several years, 51 percent of Starbucks' milk is hormone-free nationwide as of May.

Bovine growth hormone, known as rBGH or rBST, spurs an increase in the cow's milk of another hormone that is associated with increased rates of breast, colon and prostate cancer in humans. We'll be following Starbucks' progress matching its suppliers to our hormone-free demands.

See Starbucks' response and take action if you haven't already

..>..>..>..>..>..> ..> ..>
Events

Don't Forget to Register for Bike and Hike

Spend a day in the great outdoors this fall with friends and family to support breast cancer prevention. Both Bike Against the Odds and Peak Hike afford spectacular views, plenty of water stops and support, organic lunch and an expo where you can learn how to ask, act and live to reduce your risk of breast cancer.

Register for Bike Against the Odds, September 16 »

Register for Peak Hike, October 14 »


Invite friends to join the fun »

Online Giving

We Love Used Wheels!

Avoid the headache of selling your used car and earn a tax deduction by donating it to the Breast Cancer Fund. A simple online form gets you started.

Donate your car »

Measure Every Step

Track your speed, distance, calories and steps with a Technology for Outdoors Accelerator watch. For every women's accelerator watch sold, Tech 4 O will donate 1 percent of sales to the Breast Cancer Fund.

Pick your Accelerator »

Our Mission: In response to the public health crisis of breast cancer,
the Breast Cancer Fund identifies — and advocates for elimination of —
the environmental and other preventable causes of the disease.
© Breast Cancer Fund, All Rights Reserved
Breast Cancer Fund
1388 Sutter Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94109-5400

Forward to a friend »
Was this e-mail forwarded to you? Subscribe today »



Unsubscribe from this mailing.

Modify your profile and subscription preferences.


--
---- End Of Forwarded Message -----

> 86A : "Our estimate is that about three-quarters of the current annual
incidence of breast cancer in the United States is being caused by earlier
ionizing radiation, primarily from medical sources".
Quoted from, John William Gofman MD .

Of whom was worked on the Manhattan Project:
>

Quoted from Gofman, Book on line -
http://www.ratical.org/radiation/CNR/PBC/index.html


84: Pesticides,
("X-rays can enhance the action of the toxic chemicals", use "find in page" under the Edit for "radiation "),
Source: Journal of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine, Mar96, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p55, 70p, 58 charts, 2 diagrams, 17 graphs, 2bw. HERBICIDES -- Health aspects; PESTICIDES -- Physiological effect http://www.angelfire.com/nm /redcollarcrime/pestherb.html

____________________________________

U.S. Lags in Toxicity Testing,
Wednesday, May 3, 2000, Los Angeles Times

A Congressional Report shows that less than six percent of the known cancer causing chemicals are tracked with  or tested for in cancer cases. 

http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/lack.html

________

Bob Nichols reported on the Depleted Uranium being released in the Bay area
Wanted to ensure that you are aware of this, and more.
 
More lies from Livermore nuclear weapons lab
by Bob Nichols, Project Censored Award Winner
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2007/05/12/18415015.php
:
Pat Gray of the Green Party is in rather deep with this.
 
Just wanted to make sure that you are aware. 

Project Censored 2005 reports >

4: High Levels of Uranium Found in Troops and Civilians

11,000 U.S. Soldiers Dead From D.U. Poisoning,
56% DISABILITY RATE 1991 VETS
By Bob Nichols    
February 2005

http://www.projectcensored.org/publications/2005/4.html

The Toxic Reverend
Blog http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend
Red Collar Crimes in  Radiation Experiments
 

Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
" Beyond Treason" with depleted uranium
"What you do not know about
our government could kill you"

http://www.gulfwarvets.com



FYI-
   It would be of benefit to everyone if the Breast Cancer Fund,
the Union of Concerned Scientists and John Hammell, all got
"on the same page" and worked together. John Hammell is the
"International Advocates For Health Freedom and has help expose
much of the FDA's "money trail" from drug companies.
http://www.iahf.com/
Also note the Sunshine Project at: www.sunshine-project.org

What will it take to get all of you on the same page and working together ?
Please edit e-mail addresses if posting or forwarding on e-mail lists.
I do not mind if my address
es is not edited. T.R.


______________

Scientific Integrity Program | Union of Concerned Scientists

Proposals to reform government science to restore integrity and
impartiality, to protect health, safety, and environment.
www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/ - 37k
-------

FDA Scientists Pressured to Exclude, Alter Findings

The Union of Concerned Scientists released survey results that demonstrate
pervasive and dangerous political influence of science at the FDA.
www.ucsusa.org/news/press_release/fda -scientists-pressured.html


_____________________________________________


Also see;


Union of Concerned Scientists

UCS offers more networking opportunities for citizens and scientists interested in specific issues:

FEED (Food & Environment Electronic Digest)
for everyone who cares about healthy food choices

Sound Science Initiative
for scientists committed to the environment


___________________________________________

157 : POISON FOR PROFIT
CHEM/PHARM HAS NO EQUAL - WHAT A BUSINESS PLAN!
By Ashley Simmons Hotz May 15, 2002
The huge transnational companies that produce toxic chemicals found in
pesticides, herbicides and industrial and household products profit not
only from the sale of these products, but also from the symptoms and
chronic illnesses that they can trigger.
http://www.redflagsweekly.com/storm_warnings/poison.html

___________________________

Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com


_____________

Political Affairs Magazine - 113 Institutions Charged with ...

Toxic Reverend , 01/26/2007 22:21.
The Sunshine Project; Oversight of Research Involving Biological
Weapons
Agents Regulation, Committees, Safety, ...
www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/4641/1/231/ - 55k

___________

Biological Weapons Convention - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2007 Francis A. Boyle (a member of the Sunshine Project ), who drafted a
1989 federal law that criminalized violations of the 1972 Biological Weapons ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_Weapons_Convention

Excerpt:
2007 Francis A. Boyle (a member of the Sunshine Project ), who drafted a 1989
federal law that criminalized violations of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention,
was among five people who submitted comments on the Army's final environmental
evaluation of its proposed laboratory. In a published January 31, 2007 News Post
article (posted at Access Library) written by Alison Walker-Baird and censored from
the major news medias, Francis A. Boyle is quoted as saying, "If federal law is followed
to the letter, biodefense labs at Fort Detrick (United States) would be shut down and
their decision-makers would spend life in prison".

End of excerpt.  Boyle is in the To field of this e-mail.


TR
The Toxic Reverend Blog
http://blog.myspace.com/toxicreverend

The Toxic Reverend
Who's a  criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend



Saturday, June 30, 2007 
Sent as an e-mail To:
"Julia Brody. Silent Spring"
Silent Spring
www.silentspring.org

Maybe school children should be taught not to play
in areas where they notice "sick" wild life ? Be that
frgs, rates, mice, grasshoppers and so on ....Teach
the kids to report such findings to the proper agency.

12B   Wildlife As Sentinels of Human Health
Effects in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin,
beluga, biomarkers, developmental toxicity, ..

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2001/suppl-6/853-861fox/fox-full.html ..- 96.5KB

Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements Volume 109, Number S6, December 2001


Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a
monthly journal of peer-reviewed research and
news
on the impact of the environment on human
health
.

EHP
is published by the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences and its content is free
online. Print issues are available by paid subscription.



Contact list:
"Martha Dimes PhD Managing Editor EHP Children Health Section" <dimes@niehs.nih.gov>, "Kimberly Thigpen News Editor EHP" < thigpenk@niehs.nih.gov>, "Matthew Longnecker MD ScD Interim Science Editor EHP" <longnec1@niehs.nih.gov>, "Kenneth Korach PhD Interim Editor-in-Chief EHP" < korach@niehs.nih.gov>, "Dorothy Ritter Managing Editor EHP Toxicogenomics Section" <ritter@niehs.nih.gov>, "Steven Kleeberger PhD Interim Science Editor EHP" < kleeber1@niehs.nih.gov>, "Chensheng Lu EHP" <clu2@sph.emory.edu>, "Philip Iannaccone MD EHP" < pmi@northwestern.edu>, "Hui Hu EHP International Editor" <hu1@niehs.nih.gov>, "Rita B. Hanson Managing Editor EHP" < hanson2@niehs.nih.gov>, "Susan Booker Managing Editor EHP News" <booker@niehs.nih.gov>,

Two e-mails attached:

The second is a list of stories about flocks of
birds dying, the world over.

The first fwd concerns suspected biological weapons:

The Bird Flu Accident that Didn't
Happen in Austin, Texas
Austin Indymedia 15 Jan 2007
http://austin.indymedia.org/newswire/display/35164/index.php

  It is worth noting that Garth Nicolson PhD has written
hundreds of peer reviewed medical journal articles and
does make mention of the synergistic effects of
"toxic chemicals" (such as pesticides) and biological
weapons of the non-lethal "Incapacitating" variety,
at his web site  www.immed.org  (67:)
and his "Project Day Lily" book
www.projectdaylily.com

67: 08/09/00 "CFS National Radio Program transcript.

with Dr. Roger G. Mazlen interviewing Prof. Garth Nicolson"
http://www.immed.org/whatsnew/CFSRadioProgNov99.html

Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Justice is Homeless <homelessjustice@gmail.com>
Date: Jan 17, 2007 2:21 PM
Subject: Bioweapons Fwd: Birds Falling From the Sky All Over the Globe!
To: Toxic Reverend <toxicreverend@gmail.com>
Cc: Justice Is Homeless <homelessjustice@yahoo.com>, Green Issues Work Group < GreenIssuesWorkingGroup@yahoogroups.com>

113 Institutions Charged with Refusing
to Reveal Biotech Research
By Sherwood Ross 1-07-07
Posted at: Political Affairs
http://www.politicalaffairs.net/article/articleview/4641/1/231/

Basically, their operations in many cases are being
kept secret, according to watchdog

Sunshine Project of Austin, Tex.,
http://www.sunshine-project.org/
a nonprofit that attempts to protect the public
from the risks of biotechnology experiments.

The Bird Flu Accident that Didn't
Happen in Austin, Texas
Austin Indymedia 15 Jan 2007
http://austin.indymedia.org/newswire/display/35164/index.php
Blessings,

The Toxic Reverend

Who's a criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: XXX
Date: Jan 15, 2007 3:49 AM
Subject: Birds Falling From the Sky All Over the Globe!
To: undisclosed-recipients

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x133760
*Birds Falling From the Sky All Over the Globe!*

[[Gee, I didn't know they're that many Chicken Littles!!]]

Edited on Wed Jan-10-07 04:53 PM by mhatrw

Australia --
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,2103...

THOUSANDS of birds have fallen from the skies over Esperance and no one
knows why.

Texas --
    http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/loca...

The discovery of dozens of mysteriously dead birds shut down Congress
Avenue on Monday morning, closing dozens of businesses for hours and
keeping hundreds of workers away from their jobs in part of the city's
most important commercial center.

Idaho (ducks) --
     http://www.sltrib.com/news/ci_4855994

Preliminary test results indicate a bacterial or fungal infection could
be to blame for the deaths of as many as 2,500 mallard ducks in a
bizarre cluster along a southeastern Idaho creek bed, a state game
official says.  More tests are now planned on water and grain, said
David Parrish, supervisor for the Magic Valley region of the Idaho
Department of Fish and Game.

"We have some preliminary results," he told The Associated Press late
Thursday in a telephone interview. "It could be some type of bacterial
infection or a fungal-related infection.  But we haven't confirmed that
for sure."

Parrish and members of the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality,
the state Department of Agriculture, the federal Homeland Security
Department and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service conferred by conference
call late Thursday.  Parrish said the die-off was not typical. "It's
fairly uncommon, especially in these types of numbers and in such a
confined area," he said.

    http://www.todaysthv.com/news/news.aspx?storyid=38739

Last year, about 500 mostly mallard ducks died in similar circumstances
at a pond in Waterloo, Iowa.  The Iowa Department of Natural Resources
said the ducks likely died from Aspergillosis.

Maine (crows) --
Sun Journal

Residents of the neighborhood next to the Promenade Mall are puzzled
over dozens of dead crows that seem to be dropping from the sky.

     http://www.boston.com/news/local/maine/articles/2006/12...

Residents unnerved by the unexplained deaths of dozens of crows in a
neighborhood next to the Promenade Mall hope tests by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture will provide some answers.

To residents, it seems almost as though dead crows were falling from the
sky. Damien Perreault, 71, said he disposed of 10 dead crows he found on
a walk Monday.  That didn't count crows dead in the trees.  Ray
Beaudoin, a resident of Summit Avenue, called animal control officials
when the dead crows started appearing a couple of weeks ago.

Azerbaijan (various fowl) --
     http://en.apa.az/news.php?id=18697

Mass death of poultries is observed in the village Boyuk Bahmanli of
Fuzuli region, the villagers told the APA.

They said that mass death of poultries was observed in several yards and
they appealed to the veterinary service. The death reasons are unknown.
Besides, a lot of dead fowls were found in the water basins of the
village, as well as in the ponds on the neutral strip on border with Iran.

France (chickens) --
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6191599.stm

French authorities say they cannot rule out bird flu after 4,000
chickens died on a French farm on Saturday.

Colorado (mostly starlings) --
    http://www.longmontfyi.com/Local-Story.asp?id=14007

About 40 dead birds littered a short stretch of U.S . Highway 287 south
of the city Tuesday.

Boulder County health officials and the Colorado Division of Wildlife
were still coordinating efforts late afternoon to investigate the site,
just south Mooring Road.

South Dakota (geese) --
    http://www.argusleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/2...

Salinity was responsible for the deaths of about 1,000 geese near
Watertown in November.

The snow geese and blue geese were found in late November on Lake
Nicholson, about 15 miles northwest of Watertown.

Tests found high mineral concentrations in their brains.  That, along
with lethargy observed in dying birds, is consistent with "salt
toxicosis," Morlock said.

Idaho (owls) --
    http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650221073,00.html

A study of roadkill on Interstate 84 between Boise and Burley has found
so many dead barn owls that a Boise State University scientist says he's
concerned the owls could disappear from areas surrounding the travel
corridor.

"I don't have enough information to predict the viability of the
species," Jim Belthoff told The Times-News. "But the mere fact that cars
are killing this many animals from one species is alarming."

Belthoff expects to publish a study of the issue later this year.

For 2 1/2 years, Belthoff and graduate student, Than Boves, have twice a
month driven the southern Idaho highway between Boise and Burley
collecting animals killed by vehicles.

They found 2,518 dead animals, with 800 of those being barn owls, the
most common dead animal found in the study.




--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.410 / Virus Database: 268.16.10/625 - Release Date: 1/13/07



--
Regards,

The Toxic Reverend

Who are the criminals ?
Journalists, environmentalists,
the homeless, doctors.....
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend
aka Justice Is Homeless

1991 Gulf  War Vets
"Beyond Treason"
Bioweapons and chronic illnesses / cancer
http://www.gulfwarvets.com

Providing Accurate Insider Information on
Corruption in the Three Branches of Government
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/
Friday, June 29, 2007 
Excerpt from the attached news letter:
7) "Barry Commoner Responds to Attacks on Rachel Carson"
Ecologist Barry Commoner responds to a New York Times column that attacks Silent Spring author Rachel Carson.
http://thepumphandle.wordpress.com/2007/06/27/commoner-responds-to-attacks-on-carson/

End of excerpt:

Comment:

 The facts are that a Congressional Report by Nancy Pelosi,
the Speaker of the House, documented that
of the 1,400
chemicals known to cause cancer, less than 6% are tracked. 
And that many more chemicals might cause cancer, but
have not been adequately tested or evaluated.


U.S. Lags in Toxicity Testing,
Wednesday, May 3, 2000, Los Angeles Times http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/lack.html


________

LA Times newspaper article reported;

Common chemicals are linked to breast cancer
Of the 216 compounds, many in the air, food or everyday items.
By, Marla Cone marla.cone@latimes.com
May 14, 2007
The article cites reports showing that the vast majority of breast
cancers are caused by toxic environmental exposures.
_______

26 Trade Secrets;
A web page from Bill Moyers Public Broadcasting show, national television. Documentation of 50 years of corporate cover up  of toxic chemicals poisoning pf people, and the
millions of dollars spent in law suits, prior to the
"Sunshine Laws" that no longer allow them to "seal the records" in out of court settlements.
http://www.pbs.org/tradesecrets/index.html

__________

The simple facts are that chemical companies developed
chemical and biological weapons for our country. Back in
World War One and Two, they made things like nerve gas.
At some point, the watered down the nerve gas and started
calling them "pesticides". The report
"Poison for Profit"
(157) documents that the chemical companies and the
pharmaceutical companies are really controlled by the same
people.

157: POISON FOR PROFIT
CHEM/PHARM HAS NO EQUAL - WHAT A BUSINESS PLAN!
By Ashley Simmons Hotz May 15, 2002
The huge transnational companies that produce toxic chemicals
found in pesticides, herbicides and industrial and household
products profit not only from the sale of these products, but
also from the symptoms and chronic illnesses that they can
trigger.
http://www.redflagsweekly.com/storm_warnings/poison.html


Even more disturbing is what is termed "the revolving door" from these companies and their executives into many of the high ranking administration offices of our government, in Washington DC. From the National Institute of Health to the Food and Drug Administration and beyond.

"The revolving door" is easily shown with an Internet www.google.com search term, "revolving door washington DC drugs chemical companies".

___________


Many of the "tolerable levels of exposure" to a (singular)

toxic chemical have been fraudulently produced for decades.


It is well documented in the book "Toxic Deception (81) that

they have known this since the 1970's. In the 1950's, 1960's

and 1970's, Industrial Bio-Test Laboratories (IBT) performed

about 35-40% of all U.S. Toxicology testing. Of the 867

audits of IBT performed by the FDA under the 1962 law, 618

were found to be invalid because of numerous discrepancies

between the study conduct and data. FDA flexed its muscles

and found four IBT managers guilty of fraud." Yet the EPA

has still been accepting these "studies" that are financed by

industry, with out any real review !!!

http://www.westgard.com/guest16.htm



Test fraud again made headlines in 1994, when Craven

Laboratories was fined over 15 million dollars and its ... Fifty

Years of Legislation, by CAROLINE COX (132).



81: Toxic Deception:
How the Chemical Industry Manipulates Science, Bends the

Law and Endangers Your Health. 2nd ed. Dan Fagin,

Marianne Lavelle, and the Center for Public Integrity. 1999.

250 pp. ISBN 1567511627 ABSTRACTS OF NEW BOOKS

ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, American Journal of

Public Health, Jul99, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p1120, 2p.
</span>

http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime/td.html

___


132: Registering Pesticides No Guarantee of Safety....
would not occur in the future. 38 However, test fraud again
made headlines in 1994, when Craven Laboratories was
fined over 15 million dollars and its ... Fifty Years of
Legislation, by CAROLINE COX
http://www.getipm.com/government/pesticide-registration.htm


____________________

The irony of prescription drugs


Psychiatrists Top List in Drug Maker Gifts


If you need to reach The Times immediately,
please call 212-556-1234.
Published: June 27, 2007 New York Times
Mental Health & Behavior <(section)

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/27/health/psychology/27doctors.html?ex=1183608000&en=9e3ddc820866893b&ei=5040&partner=MOREOVERFEATURES

______

Mentally ill die 25 years earlier, on average - USATODAY.com

Adults with serious mental illness treated in public
systems die about 25 years earlier than Americans
overall, a gap that's widened since the early '90s ...
www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-05-03-mental-illness_N.htm
 - 48k -


___________



When Healing Becomes a Crime
Kenny Ausubel is the founder of the annual Bioneers conference

(www.bioneers.org)
and the author most recently of When
Healing Becomes a Crime (Inner Traditions, 2000) based on his
award-winning documentary, Hoxsey (1987). (c) 2001.

http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/hoxsey.html
l

_

46: - What patients at 'The Hutch' weren't told about the
experiments in which they died.

A five-part series by the Seattle Times

March 2001 , by Duff Wilson, now a New York Times reporter and member of the www.ire.org
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/uninformed_consent/

"Duff Wilson" dwilson@nytimes.com

Blessings; Defend "Silent Spring",

The Toxic Reverend

MySpace Blog
http://blog.myspace.com/toxicreverend

The Toxic Reverend
Who's a  criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend
Friday, June 29, 2007 
Two e-mails on Pet Food:

The first is titles:
Report Rates Pet Food

The second is titled:
Food Safety: The Importance of Retailers and Codex
Includes information about toxic pet food from China
and more ... It is a
Stratfor: Public Policy Intelligence Report - June 28, 2007

Blessings,

The Toxic Reverend Blog:is at:
http://blog.myspace.com/toxicreverend
Post Script: If Stratfor has a problem with the
educational posting of their material, I will have
to edit it out of the blog.  Even if so, I still
recommend
Stratfor.  They are just to good at
what they do.
Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (Stratfor), is at
www.stratfor.com
Please note the "Fair Use Statement" that I have added,
copyright laws still apply.
_______________________________________

From: News Target www.newstarget.com

Dear readers,

 

Today, the Consumer Wellness Center reveals a

groundbreaking new report that rates 570 pet food

ingredients for their quality and safety. Created in

cooperation with Dr. Lisa Newman, N.D., Ph.D., a

nutritionist with over 20 years of clinical

experience, the new report is entitled, "Pet Food

Ingredients Revealed!" and is viewable online right

now.

 

Click the headline below for the full story, or go

directly to the report at:

http://www.newstarget.com/Report_pet_food_ingredients_0.html


..>..>
Health: Pet food revealed: Consumer Wellness Center posts nutritional review of 570 pet food ingredients
The non-profit Consumer Wellness Center today posted a detailed nutritional review of 570 pet food ingredients commonly found in pet food products (both canned and dry). The list, created by a joint effort between pet food formulator Dr. Lisa Newman,...

 



Excerpt from the above web p[age:

The following list of pet food ingredients and ratings
was created by a cooperative effort between pet food
formulator Dr. Lisa Newman, N.D., Ph.D.
(www.Azmira.com),
Mike Adams (www.HealthRanger.org) and the
non-profit Consumer Wellness Center
(www.ConsumerWellness.org). Mike Adams and the
CWC analyzed the ingredients of 448 popular pet food
products sold in the United States and organized them
by frequency. Dr. Newman then provided a nutritional
analysis and comment for each ingredient.

We then organized this information into four
reference lists:

1) Pet food ingredients by rating (from 5 stars down to
1 star, with 5 stars indicating the best quality
ingredients).

2) Pet food ingredients by frequency (sorted by how
frequently they appear in pet food products, from 96%
down to 1%).

3) Pet food ingredients listed alphabetically (to make it
easier for you to reference an ingredient you're
curious about).

4) Worst pet food ingredients (which lists all the 1-star
ingredients, indicating lowest quality).

You can view these lists by clicking on the chapter
headings on the lft side of the web page, at :>
http://www.newstarget.com/Report_pet_food_ingredients_0.html

End of excerpt

__________________________________

Please note the Fair Use Statement as applicable to
the next forwarded e-mail:

This e-mail contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
We are making such material available in our efforts to
advance understanding of environmental, political, human
rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice
issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
 copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section
107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to
those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for
purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must
obtain permission from the copyright owner.
:

Besides all of that ...... this is free advertisement ....
and if you want more reports like the one in the
forwarded e-mail, you will have to sign up for it at
Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (Stratfor),
www.stratfor.com

T.R.

Stratfor Premium members can access regular updates, in-depth analysis,
and expanded coverage on this issue by logging in at:
        http://www.stratfor.com/
If you are not a Premium member and are interested in gaining full
access to Stratfor, please click here [
http://www.stratfor.com/current.php?ref=alert ] to take advantage of our
special introductory rates.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: XXX
Date: Jun 28, 2007 2:43 PM
Subject: Startfor~Food Safety: The Importance of Retailers and Codex
To: undisclosed-recipients

Stratfor: Public Policy Intelligence Report -
June 28, 2007

*Food Safety: The Importance of Retailers and Codex*
By Bart Mongoven

Chinese regulators said June 27 they have shut down more than 180 food
processing plants over the past six months for using illegal fillers in
food products.  The announcement follows a series of incidents in which
Chinese processors exported unsafe consumable goods, including pet food
and toothpaste -- products that reached store shelves in the United States.

The investigation into the most inflammatory of the incidents, the
deadly contamination of pet food with the plasticizer melamine, led to
the discovery that excessive amounts of melamine and other similar
chemicals are common additives in Chinese food manufacturing.
Meanwhile, more than 200 Chinese food shipments have been turned away
from the U.S. market in the past year because federal officials
considered them contaminated.

As a result of the growing concern among Americans over the potential
health risks of food from China, attention is turning to the most
influential regulator of food safety in the United States.  This is not
the Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.), nor is it the Department of
Agriculture (U.S.D.A.).  In fact, it is not a government agency at all.
  It is retailers -- the end-of-the-line sellers who have learned by
experience that consumers will blame them if something goes wrong. In
the long term, though, the uproar over tainted Chinese products likely
will focus public attention on the little-known body that establishes
global food safety standards: the Codex Alimentarius Commission.  Known
as Codex, it is a joint project of the U.N. Food and Agriculture
Organization and the World Health Organization.

The timing of the contamination incidents could not be worse for
Beijing.  First, the United States and China are involved in a low-grade
trade spat over agriculture imports, with the United States only
recently making a concession on the importation of Chinese processed
chickens.  Meanwhile, China still complains that its products are
unfairly turned back at the border and, four years after the U.S. mad
cow scare, China continues to ban U.S. beef.

Moreover, the incidents have increased consumer product companies'
skittishness about importing food from China just as the United States
is beginning to emerge as a major buyer of Chinese foods.  They also
come at a crucial time in the debate over "country-of-origin" labeling
in the United States, and during a period in which retailers are
beginning to grow accustomed to their role as the primary food-safety
enforcer in the United States.

Regardless of whether the events of the last six months lead to an
accelerated phase-in of country-of-origin labeling in the United States
(which would force food companies to label fresh meat from China), they
will result in dramatic changes in Chinese food manufacturing. Consumer
product companies, under pressure from retailers, will demand Chinese
government guarantees that the country's food exports are produced in
keeping with the minimum recognized international standards.

A likely beneficiary of this hot-button issue is Codex, which not only
sets those standards, but also has made increasing its reach into
developing countries a prime objective.  As China grasps for ways to
assure its trading partners and the global food industry that its
products can be trusted, working with Codex is emerging as a prominent
element of its strategy.

The Problem of Volume

U.S. food safety laws are a complex web of regulations and testing
regimes enforced by the U.S.D.A. and the F.D.A.  The most important of
the U.S. food safety laws is Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points
(H.A.C.C.P.), which is considered the global model for food safety.  All
meat and most other products in the United States are subject to
H.A.C.C.P. and also to various labeling and registration requirements.
Imported food must pass additional hurdles.  The most
stringent of these, instituted under the Bioterrorism Act of 2002, gives
U.S.D.A. inspectors the power to deny access to any food shipment based
solely on the inspector's professional assessment that something in the
shipment is amiss.

Passed in the wake of 9/11 out of concern that the food supply could be
a terrorism target, the Bioterrorism Act also gave the U.S.D.A. a
significant increase in funding to inspect imported food.  Still,
although the number of inspectors at the borders has
increased dramatically, the industry estimates that less than 5 percent
of the food that enters the country is inspected for safety.  The
problem, federal officials say, is that the infrastructure to inspect
every container of food moving through U.S. ports would be prohibitively
expensive.  To make the system as efficient as possible, U.S.D.A. policy
is to concentrate on shipments of particularly troublesome foods, such
as shellfish, and on food from historically troublesome countries, such
as China.  These are checked far more often than most other food shipments.

If monitoring significant percentages of food imports to the United
States seems daunting, imagine the position of a Chinese regulatory
agency responsible for monitoring the practices of the country's food
processors.  Food for export is more highly regulated than food for
domestic consumers, whose safety requirements for consumable goods are
far more lax.  The problem is that many manufacturers make
products for both markets, and are more accustomed to the less-stringent
standards.  Of those that manufacture food for export, the vast majority
are small businesses that employ fewer than 10 workers.  In fact, most
of the 180 facilities shut down by Chinese officials over the past six
months have been these small
food-processing operations.

Local governments are largely responsible for policing the health and
hygiene standards of food-processing facilities, but most do a poor job.
  First, there is no ethic regarding food safety comparable to that of
Europe, the United States or Japan.  As a result, there is little
indigenous support for local officials to "meddle" in commercial
affairs.  Further, because food exports are still relatively new in
China, food processors do not think of their products as part of a
global supply chain.  That Americans want something different is not
unimportant to small-business owners --
it is simply not something they commonly consider.

In effect, U.S. and Chinese regulators share a key problem: They cannot
adequately cover the ground they would need to in order to assure that
food is handled properly and is free from contamination.

Consumer Products and Precautions

The most important food regulator in the United States, therefore, is
the retailer. More than any other link in the chain, food retailers are
universally recognized as the most influential monitors of food safety.
  The rationale is simple: Decades of experience have shown retailers
that when a product makes consumers sick, they do not blame the food
manufacturer, they blame the seller -- be it a restaurant or
supermarket.  Years of bad experiences in trying to pass blame to food
processors have convinced food retailers that they have a critical
interest in monitoring food safety.

Retailers pass this concern up the chain to the product manufacturers,
which also are beginning to see that they are considered crucial
elements in the chain of responsibility for food safety.  As a result,
food manufacturers are becoming increasingly cautious about what
products carry their brand name.  This, then, is
similar to the climate change and chemical usage issues in that critics
are forcing companies to embrace precaution as a tool in protecting
their core brands.

In doing this, retailers use Codex standards as an important guide.
Established by a mix of scientific experts and government
representatives, Codex standards are designed to provide a view of the
minimum standards for food handling, ingredients, contaminants, etc.
These standards are universally recognized as  proper (if minimal)
standards for food safety.  In industrialized countries, the Codex
standards are considered important baselines against which food
manufacturers can compare their food handling.  For developing
countries, including China, that lack the resources, expertise or
experience necessary to promulgate effective food
safety standards, Codex's standards are the basis for national policy.

Because it sets the bar for food safety around the world, Codex's work
is of critical importance to the food processors, consumer product
companies and retailers in industrialized countries that often depend on
imports.

The Power of Standards

China has been active in Codex for more than a decade, and in recent
years has become a leading member.  In April, it hosted a Codex workshop
on food contamination, and took leadership of the Codex committee that
studies contamination issues.  It also leads the committee concerned
with pesticide residues.  In taking a leadership role in Codex, Beijing
is trying to send a clear message that it understands Codex is an
important part of the solution to the bind it is in. Given that the
safety of China's food products is being questioned and that the rules
are being enforced far more strongly by retailers than government,
China's increased participation in Codex makes sense, and building
Codex-based standards into all food manufacture appears a crucial
element of the country's new strategy.

The challenge it faces is winning adherence by the domestic food
industry.  It is trying to train food processors in Codex standards, but
those efforts are going slowly.  Here, Beijing can benefit to some
extent from the pressure exerted by retailers in the West.  Buyers in
Europe, North America and Japan will reward those who follow Codex and,
more important, punish those who do not.

Finally, adherence to Codex standards also will give China an additional
weapon against the United States in the ongoing tiff over food imports.
  For centuries, hygiene has been a leading justification for trade
barriers between countries.  An importing country could claim not that
it has a barrier to trade, but rather that the exporter's food products
are not up to the importer's hygiene requirements.  To end this
practice, trade negotiators established Codex standards: If an exporter
followed (and enforced) Codex standards, its products could not be
deemed "unsanitary" by
importers.



Stratfor Premium members can access regular updates, in-depth analysis,
and expanded coverage on this issue by logging in at:
        http://www.stratfor.com/
If you are not a Premium member and are interested in gaining full
access to Stratfor, please click here [
http://www.stratfor.com/current.php?ref=alert ] to take advantage of our
special introductory rates.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Was this forwarded to you?  Sign up to start receiving your own copy --
it's always thought-provoking, insightful, and free.  To register, go to:
        https://www.stratfor.com/subscriptions/free-weekly-intelligence-reports.php

===============================================================
NOTIFICATION OF COPYRIGHT

This is a publication of Strategic Forecasting, Inc. (Stratfor), and is
protected by the United States Copyright Act, all applicable state laws,
and international copyright laws and is for the Subscriber's use only.
  This publication may not be distributed or
reproduced in any form without written permission.  For more information
on the Terms of Use, please visit our website at:
        www.stratfor.com

(c) 2007 Strategic Forecasting, Inc. All rights reserved.






--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.9.12/878 - Release Date: 6/28/07 5:57 PM



--
---- End Of Forwarded Message -----
Regards,

aka
The Toxic Reverend
Who's a  criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend

Homicide Charges For Corporations
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime


The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
A Problem Becoming A Solution
http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/parkh.html


The Gospel of Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" wass posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
This page has been censored and removed from the
Archives "Way Back Machine" to 2005.  Trying to find a
server to re-post this censored information.
Could use some editing help too.
http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/tr.html


Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com
Tuesday, June 26, 2007 

Which Sunscreens are Safest? | Environmental Working Group

First-ever online database rates sunscreen safety and effectiveness ...
Today, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) released the ...
www.ewg.org/node/21719 - 27k - Jun 24, 2007
____________________

The sunscreen myth:
How sunscreen products actually promote cancer
Friday, June 15, 2007 by: Mike Adams, News Target
http://www.newstarget.com/021903.html

Excerpt from article:

the toxic chemical ingredients used in most sunscreen products are actually
carcinogenic and have never been safety tested or safety approved by
the FDA. They get absorbed right through the skin (a porous organ that absorbs
most substances it comes into contact with) and enter the bloodstream.

End of excerpt.
_____________________________________

The attached article on sunlight and the best ways to protect yourself is from:
Beyond Health
www.beyondhealth.com
REPRINTED FROM BEYOND HEALTH News
Sunlight and Health

by Raymond Francis

In a number of BHN issues beginning in July/August of '96, we have told our
readers that, contrary to popular belief, sunlight does not cause cancer. In
fact cancer rates are much lower where there is more sunlight. I have
recently come across an excellent book by Zane Kime, MD titled Sunlight.
Dr. Kime looks at the relationship of sunlight and human health. He takes
studies from the scientific literature and demonstrates sunlight's beneficial
effects in lowering cholesterol, blood pressure, and blood sugar. He cites
how sunlight increases endurance, sex hormone levels, and immunity.
The book also contains dietary suggestions on how to protect your
skin from sun damage the way nature intended.

It's easy to forget, in the midst of our cancer epidemic, that cancer was
traditionally a rare disease affecting less than 1% of the population. The
healthy, long-lived populations like the Hunzas and the Vilcabambas
lived at high elevations where the sun was more intense. They were
out farming every day. Yet they lived to very old ages without getting
cancer. If the sun causes cancer, how did these people and others
like the Polynesians ever survive? Skin cancer is the end-result of
many factors of which inappropriate sun exposure is only one.

Like a lot of things, too much of a good thing can be bad for you.
The sun is essential to health, but too little or too much sun will
damage health. The sun can do damage if we use it improperly.
And use it improperly is what most of us do. Studies show that the
incidence of all malignancy is 6 to 10 times lower closer to the
equator where there is more sunlight, and people who have
chronic exposure to the sun are less likely to develop melanoma
than urbanized people who have intermittent exposure.

One of the reasons for lower cancer rates may be that people
who are out in the sun all the time form pigments that protect
them from the sun, and their sun exposure makes them healthier
in the first place. Urban dwellers don't get enough healthy sun
exposure. They often get intermittent tans that fade. Repeating
this cycle may result in damage because the skin is not protected
during the tanning process. Also the urban dweller is much more
likely to burn during the tanning process. Some researchers
believe that burns are a key to skin cancer. Turning into a
red lobster is definitely not conducive to good health, as any
lobster can attest.

No one is arguing that sunlight doesn't trigger free radical activity
and that the amount of free radicals doesn't increase with the
intensity of the sunshine. These free radicals can cause skin
to age prematurely, wrinkle, and sunburn, and can damage
DNA and cause skin lesions. However, research shows that
diets rich in carotenes and other antioxidants protect the
skin against the hazards of ultraviolet sunlight. Carotenes
are a class of compounds found in plants, fruits, and
vegetables that reduce the free radical activity that causes
damage and premature aging of cells. Research has shown
that diets rich in carotenes reduce the risk of cancer and
prevent the damage to DNA that results in a number of
degenerative diseases. In fact carotenes are being called
nature's "sun umbrella." Carotenes are used up during
exposure to sunlight, so one's dietary supply must be
adequate to provide continuous protection. Here's the
problem. Very few Americans are getting adequate
amounts of fresh fruits and vegetables in their diet.
We are blaming the sun for problems caused by
poor diets and excessive inappropriate exposures.

What about sunscreens? A few decades of increasing
sunscreen use has done nothing to stop the increasing
rate of skin cancer. In fact, the chemicals in sunscreens
may even become carcinogenic when exposed to sunlight.
Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania say that
broad-spectrum sunscreens still aren't broad enough
to cover the full spectrum of potentially harmful light.
Ultraviolet radiation consists of over 100 separate
frequencies. Sunscreens don't protect against all,
and we don't know which are harmful and which
beneficial. We may even be blocking the wrong
ones. In addition, using a sunscreen can create
a false sense of security and cause people to
spend excessive amounts of time in the sun.
Researchers at the M.D. Anderson Cancer
Center in Houston say, "There is no substantial
evidence that sunscreen protects against any
of the three forms of skin cancer. Dr. Robin Marks,
a dermatologist and a professor at the University
of Melbourne says, "Relying on synthetic chemicals
to prevent cancer is laughable." Arthur Rhodes, a
University of Pittsburgh dermatologist, told a 1994
meeting of the American Cancer Society that
sunscreens "appear weakly effective or ineffective"
at preventing cancer.

The fact is we were designed to be out in the sun.
Sunlight is absolutely essential for good health in
so many ways that we don't even begin to understand
them. Unless you do something foolish, the sun won't
damage healthy people who have adequate amounts
of nutrients like carotenes, lycopene, essential fatty
acids, and vitamins A, C, E, and zinc and selenium.
Our need for the sun is exemplified by the fact that
nature intended we get most of our vitamin D from
the sun. Vitamin D is almost totally absent in vegetable foods.

When sunlight strikes the skin it sets off a multi-staged process whereby
cholesterol is ultimately changed into vitamin D. Vitamin D is essential
to the absorption of calcium from the intestines and for the production
of enzymes involved in collagen formation in the bones. Staying out of
the sun is partially responsible for our epidemic of osteoporosis,
especially in our elderly. One study found that 36% of elderly men
and 47% of elderly women were vitamin D deficient. Even moderate
sun exposure would help to alleviate this problem. However, sunlight
through window glass will not activate vitamin D synthesis.

Sunlight is absolutely essential to good health. Its only been in recent
times that the sun has been cast as our enemy. If getting too little or
too much sun is bad for us, how can the average person get what
they need without harming themselves? First of all get the sun slowly.
Secondly, stay out of the midday sun. Timing sun exposures to
avoid the hours of 10 to 2 PM will cut ultraviolet exposure by
60% because the sun is less intense. Most everyone should
try to get at least ten minutes in the sun on a daily basis and
longer on weekends. If you do it this way, your skin will adapt
through skin pigmentation and you won't get sunburned. Some
experts claim at least one hour of unfiltered sunlight per day is
essential to health. This doesn't have to be in direct sun, indirect
sunlight is acceptable but it should not be filtered through glass.
Sunlight into the retina is a very important nutrient. Retinas
need the whole spectrum of solar radiation, and wearing
glasses or contacts could screen out important frequencies
that are critical to long-term health. When you are in direct
sun for long periods, cover up. Wear a broad brimmed hat
and suitable clothing.

We need to protect against skin cancer both from the outside and the
inside. Getting an optimal amount of nutrients is essential. Eat a diet
that is rich in fresh, unrefined, essential fatty acids such as those
contained in Udo's Choice. A diet rich in carotenes is essential.
Supplementation with products like Caroplete should be considered.
Caroplete contains a natural mixture of carotenes including lycopene.
In addition, vitamins A, C, and E along with minerals like zinc and
selenium will help to both protect and repair skin.

How much sun is right for you depends on your biochemical
individuality. With a bit of awareness and following the above
suggestions, you should be able to develop a healthy golden
tan and reap the benefits of the sun without doing harm. Health
is a choice, and by developing good habits and making sensible
choices, the sun will be your friend and not your enemy.

Raymond Francis is an M.I.T.-trained scientist, a registered
nutrition consultant, author of Never Be Sick Again and Never
Be Fat Again, host of the Beyond Health Show, Chairman of
the The Project to End Disease and an internationally recognized
leader in the field of optimal health maintenance.

Reprinted with permission from:
Beyond Health® News
Subscriptions: Call 800-250-3063

website: http://www.beyondhealth.com
Copyright 1997, Beyond Health

Sign up toBeyond Health to enjoy Free Access to -

    * To enjoy all the Free Articles available
    * Listen to Archived Radio Shows
    * Enjoy our weekly NewsClips



____________________________________________________

    ---- End Of Forwarded / POSTED  Message -----

    Please forward and post.

    Also note, Toxic Revelations has been censored and removed from
    the Internet. Including the last two years that were in the Archives,
    Way Back Machine.  I am looking for another place to post, but also
    need some editing help with web pages.

    Toxic Revelations
    ^(Rough Draft of "abstract" was posted)^
    Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
    Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
    http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/tr.html

    Regards,

    Tom Krohmer
    Environmental Technologist

    aka
    The Toxic Reverend
    Who's a  criminal ?
    http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend

    Homicide Charges For Corporations
    No More Red Collar Crime
    http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime


    The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
    A Problem Becoming A Solution
    http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/parkh.html


    Toxic Revelations
    ^(Rough Draft of "abstract" is posted)^
    Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
    Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
    http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/tr.html


    Please note:

    The Gulf War Vets have posted
    "Beyond Treason"
    http://www.gulfwarvets.com



--
---- End Of Forwarded Message -----
Regards,

aka
The Toxic Reverend
Who's a  criminal ?
http://people.tribe.net/toxicreverend

Homicide Charges For Corporations
http://www.angelfire.com/nm/redcollarcrime


The Criminalization Of Homelessness;
A Problem Becoming A Solution
http://www.angelfire.com/hi/soberskidrow/parkh.html


The Gospel of Toxic Revelations
^(Rough Draft of "abstract" wass posted)^
Biological / Chemical Weapon Information, History & Treatments.
Verifiable sources and peer reviewed medical journals.
This page has been censored and removed from the
Archives "Way Back Machine" to 2005.  Trying to find a
server to re-post this censored information.
Could use some editing help too.
http://www.angelfire.com/in/sickbuildingsyndrome/tr.html


Please note:

The Gulf War Vets have posted
"Beyond Treason"
http://www.gulfwarvets.com