I was recently accused (and I use the word correctly) of being a Blues 'purist'.
It made me wonder what this means.
Does it mean that I think that Blues is something that should only be played by people, wearing suits, that slavishly copy old records note for note and play only old songs?
Does it mean that I think that the music should continue to be played as it was, without any modern influence? That the Blues ended in about 1955 and that nothing since is of any worth?
Both would be untrue.
While I love what could be called 'traditional' Blues I also have numerous CD's in my collection by artists such as; Johnny Winter, Rory Gallagher, Jimi Hendrix, The Allman Brothers, Captain Beefheart, Tom Waits, North Mississippi Allstars, The Black keys, 22-20's, Gomez, Soledad Brothers, Chuck E. Weiss, Corey Harris, Alvin Youngblood Hart and, of course Taj Mahal. This is just a selection, representative of some of the artists whose music I love and who are trying to do different things with the Blues form. Whether it's Rock, Punk, African, Psychedelic they have all added different elements to the music to create something a little different.
I also regularly attend gigs of artists I think may be doing something a little different, but who I have never heard. I may read about them online or in a magazine but I'll take a chance, hand over my money and see what happens. Over the last few years I have seen, just off the top of my head; Mr. David Viner, Dave Acari and Son Of Dave. (I've never bothered with Seasick Steve, as I think he's not really doing anything new and he can't play for shit! However, I'm not denying he's got to be good for the Blues.) I'm also keen on bands such as Hijack Oscar and Missing Cat, who are trying to do something a little different with Blues as a base.
The music should evolve and Blues artists have often embraced technology and other music forms to improve their sounds. Robert Nighthawk was among the first musicians to play an electric guitar, trying to create a new sound. Little Walter started pushing the limited amplification equipment he had available to it's very limits in an attempt to catch some of that big, fat sound he heard in horn players like Charlie Parker. Blues musicians should take their influences from where ever they hear them and incorporate them into their Blues. Recently rap and Hip Hop have been combined with the Blues, with varying degrees of success.
I think it's all very healthy and some of the new sounds are terrific, and vital if the music is to survive.
I have an open mind when it comes to Blues.
However, let me tell you what I don't like and what I don't think is healthy for the music.
What I don't like is much of the second rate Rock which is often passed off as Blues these days. Take a look at any gig listing for almost any 'Blues' festival or 'Blues' club, especially in the UK. You'll find many acts who are playing derivative Rock with only the most tenuous link to the Blues.
I once read an interview in Blues Revue where somebody said the problem with Blues/Rock is that it uses the worst elements of both. Take the clichéd posturing and repetition of some Blues and add it to the self-indulgence and egotism of Spinal tap Rock and you'll find yourself with a music lacking in depth, emotion and humour.
That's exactly what we've ended up with. To me, the sound of endless, meaningless guitar solos with ersatz emotion and technical masturbation is tired and old. The format is tired and out-dated and impossibly dull. You could take CD's by any number of these artists, stick them in you CD player, listen to them blind-folded and after only a few songs be totally unable to distinguish them from one another. One ever expanding pool of guitar wank.
Just as once the countless bands cranking out 'Dust My Broom' or 'Big Boss Man' turned the music into a parody (Can Blue Men Sing The Whites?) now the countless bands playing 'Red House' or 'Pride and Joy' are doing them same.
Photos in the magazines show a stream of (mainly overweight) geezers in black T-shirts, often sporting inappropriate cowboy hats, nearly all playing Fender Strats and pulling ugly 'cum-faces' as they squirt a million notes out of a Marshall stack.
If the first Blues I ever heard was this terminal kak, I'd have moved quickly on to something else. But still, visit you local Club or Festival and this is what you get.
It's not Blues, no matter how many 12-Bar shuffles you play.
There is obviously an audience for this. It's just not a Blues audience. There may be elements of Blues in the music but it's Rock, really. Rock is fine, just stop telling me it's Blues and that I'm narrow minded for not liking it.
So, if being a 'purist' means that I dislike dull, non-descript music which requires little imagination to play or listen to and has only the barest echo of real feeling and that instead I like music played with some thought, passion and creativity then I'm pleased to be a 'purist'.
And you should be one too.