Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 100
Sign: Gemini
City: by the beach
State: California
Country: US
Signup Date: 5/24/2005
|
|
|
|
Thursday, November 19, 2009
 |
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
 |
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, May 29, 2009
 |
Category: Art and Photography
A certain shade of green, Tell me, is that what you need? All signs around say move ahead. Could someone please explain to me Your ever present lack of speed? Are your muscles bound by ropes? Or do crutches cloud your day? My sources say the road is clear, And street signs point the way.
Are you gonna stand around till 2012 A.D.? What are you waiting for, a certain shade of green? I think I grew a gray watching you procrastinate. What are you waiting for, a certain shade of green?
Would a written invitation signed, 'Choose now or lose it all,' sedate your hesitation? Or inflame and make you stall?
You've been raised in limitation, But that glove never fit quite right. The time has passed for hand-me-downs, Choose anew, please evolve, take flight.
What are you waiting for? A written invitation? A public declaration? A private consolation?
What are you waiting for ?
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
 |
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
 |
A friend sent this to me today and it's really worth reading...
Unconditional love is the love we’re all seeking, all the time, whether we’re aware of it or not, and in our ideal life, we’d be surrounded by it in every circumstance. But how often do we inspect the quality of the love we offer others? Often, we give it with expectations, assumptions, and qualifiers; and we may then ask, is it still really love? Yes, it is, it’s just that we may without realizing it hook needs of our own to loving someone else; ideally, we will in the course of a lifetime (or many!) learn to love purely, without those requirements or pre-conditions–but how?
Our expectations are often quite reasonable; for instance, we should expect to be treated well within an intimate relationship, as healthy Self-respect and Self-regard demand it. We run into a problem, though, when we say through our behavior, “I love him; he’s rude, arrogant, thoughtless, and cheats on me, but because I love him I must stay engaged in the relationship and try to change his behavior.” This is based on the belief that everything would be fine if he would just conform to the mate’s expectations of treatment.We feel justified in demanding this because, well, we say we love him. But what we fail to realize is that love is beside the point; love can exist no matter the behaviors of any of the parties, it’s intimate relationship that’s where we must choose to be with those who treat us well–and we must do this by recognizing and accepting another’s behavior as it is, not as we think it should be.
Too often we are attracted to someone, draw closer, and then immediately begin to judge their attitudes and behavior. We feel that we can criticize and demand changes because we claim to love the individual–but what do we love if we don’t accept them as they are?
What we must learn not to do is tie our own willingness to love another to how they treat us, how they behave, or what they are out in the world; and we can only love another by seeing and accepting who they are. What I’m saying is this: we must learn to love without condition, even as we love ourselves enough not to continue in relationship with those who don’t love and respect us. It’s very simple: at the bottom of every successful and loving intimate relationship is a love for Oneself that says, “I love you no matter what; but to stay in intimate connection to me, you must continue to behave in a loving and respectful manner.” If the partner doesn’t treat us kindly, we can continue to love them, but we don’t need to remain in an intimate relationship with them–in fact, we cannot stay in intimate relationship with them if we love ourselves. Part of our weakness in loving both ourselves and others is to confuse the two, to believe that a love relationship exists even when our partner is behaving in an unloving way. It’s true that love may exist, but a loving relationship does not–and that is the heart of how we must choose our companions. It’s noble to continue to love someone who mistreats you–it isn’t noble in the least to remain open to, vulnerable to, and in intimate contact with someone who mistreats you. A truly loving attitude toward others is not based in how they treat us, but a relationship is.
One of the most mature and loving things we can do for ourselves is to recognize when we are in a close relationship where love and respect are not shown to us and to say, as Buddha is reported to have done when confronted on the path by an angry man, “I respectfully decline your gift of anger, and ask that you keep it for yourself.” You see, we may love someone, but just because they offer us something ugly or destructive doesn’t mean we must accept it. To subject ourselves to the unloving denigration of others is to treat ourselves in an unloving way–and if we don’t love ourselves, we don’t have love to give others–because we simply can’t give away what we don’t have, and if we don’t have a resource for ourselves, tangible or intangible, we are unable to share that resource with others. So, to remain in a relationship where we are treated badly is to be unable to love, since to continue involvement says we do not love ourselves, and so cannot truly love another.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
 |
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, February 09, 2007
 |
I've been trying to figure out what friendship means to other people, as it seems that my interpretaion of the word is not shared by all of my friends. I like the definitions I found below and I'm very curious to see what everyone else understands from the word friendship.
..>
| "One who multiplies joys, divides grief and whose honesty is inviolable." "One who understands our silence." "A volume of sympathy bound in cloth." "A watch that beats true for all time and never runs down." | Here is my favorite:
|
| "A friend is the one who comes in when the whole world has gone out."
| ..>
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Thursday, January 01, 1981
 |
..
|
|
|
.. .. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..
Do You Know?
- Average and Total Numbers of Animals Killed to Feed Americans in 2006
The following information comes from the Farm Animal Reform Movement
(FARM):
Chickens Total number
killed for food: 8,449,959,000 (8,034,880,000 for meat, 415,080,000 for
eggs) Average number killed per American meat-eater: 29.0 (27.6 for
meat, 1.4 for eggs) Average number consumed per American lifetime: 2,258
(2,148 for meat , 110 for eggs)
Turkeys Total number killed
for food: 273,462,000 Average number consumed per American meat-eater:
0.94 Average number consumed per American lifetime:
73
Pigs Total number killed for food: 115,139,000 Average
number consumed per American meat-eater: 0.40 Average number consumed per
American lifetime: 31
Steers and Calves Total number killed for
food: 42,394,000 Average number consumed per American meat-eater:
0.15 Average number consumed per American lifetime:
11.3
Rabbits Total number killed for food: 2.4
million Average number consumed per American meat-eater: 0.008 Average
number consumed per American lifetime: 0.65
Finfish Total number
killed for food: 6.6 billion Average number consumed per American:
23 Average number consumed per American lifetime:
1,800
Shellfish Total number killed for food: 67
billion Average number consumed per American: 230 Average number consumed
per American lifetime: 18,000
All Animals (Excluding Sea
Animals) Total number killed for food: 8.9 billion Average number consumed
per American: 30.5 Average number consumed per American lifetime:
2,374
All Animals (Including Sea Animals) Total number killed
for food: 83 billion Average number consumed per American: 280 Average
number consumed per American lifetime: 22,000
- Environmental footprint per person (US)
Average Saved by Vegan American Going Veg* Land (acres) 0.6 3.7 3.1 Erosion (tons/yr) 3.6 6.3 2.7 Water (kgal/yr) 73 168 95 Polluted rivers (ft) 2.6 12 9.4 Polluted lakes (sq ft) 230 1100 850 Manure (tons/yr) 0 5.5 5.5 Feed Grain (lbs/yr) 0 1900 1900 Energy (gal gas/yr) 24 111 87=20 Greenhouse gases 0.2 1.9 1.6=20 (US tons CO2-equivalent/yr)
* Subtractions may appear off due to independent rounding
U.S. Animal Agriculture is responsible for:
LAND USE: 1 billion acres of land. That's 43% of all U.S. land, and 83% of U.S. agricultural land. CROPS: 560 billion pounds of grain a year fed to U.S. livestock, enough to feed 840 million people. SOIL EROSION: 2 trillion pounds a year. ENERGY: The energy equivalent of burning 26 billion gallons of gas a year. GREENHOUSE GAS: Emissions equivalent to 1 trillion pounds of CO2 a year. EXCREMENT: 9 billion pounds a year, or as much in 3 days as produced by the U.S. human population in a year. WATER USE: 35 trillion gallons a year, more than half of all US water use, enough for every American to take 26 showers a day. WATER POLLUTION: 570,000 miles of U.S. streams and rivers and 6 million acres of U.S. lakes and reservoirs are polluted due to animal agriculture, comprising 15% of all streams, rivers, lakes, and reservoirs.
- Origin of the Word "Vegetarian"
The word vegetarian, coined by the founders of the British Vegetarian
Society in 1842, comes from the Latin word vegetus, meaning "whole,
sound, fresh, or lively," as in homo vegetus-a mentally and physically
vigorous person. The original meaning of the word implies a balanced
philosophical and moral sense of life, a lot more than just a diet of
vegetables and fruits.
- Origin of the Word "Vegan"
The word vegan pronounced /ˈviːgən/ [vee-gun], was
originally derived from vegetarian in 1944 when Elsie Shrigley and Donald
Watson, frustrated that the term "vegetarianism" had come to include the
eating of dairy products, founded the UK Vegan Society. "Vegan", which
they saw as "the beginning and end of vegetarian", started and ended with
the first three and last two letters of vegetarian.
- Estate Planning For Pets
Summary from the site:
This web site is devoted to providing a broad-based information resource for
pet owners, and the professionals who assist them, in estate planning for their
pets. All too often, pet owners encounter professionals who are directly or
indirectly dismissive of their desires to make sure their pets receive adequate
care. The underlying assumption behind this web site is that the reader takes
the issue of estate planning for pets seriously.
- How to Write an Effective Letter
A well-thought out and polite letter will carry much more weight than an
hastily written, angry letter. When writing letters to the media or court
offices, here are some guidelines to keep in mind...
- Hitler Was Not A Vegetarian
New York Times corrects article on Hitler and refutes longstanding myth that Hitler
was a vegetarian.
.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Quotes] [Store]
[Links] [Tips]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
..
..
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|