MySpace

LATEST NEWS ON THE WAR!!!

Peace in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka


Last Updated: 3/24/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 101
Sign: Aquarius

Country: LK
Signup Date: 5/29/2007

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Wednesday, October 17, 2007 

Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3236030.stm

From a secret jungle base in the north-east of Sri Lanka, Velupillai Prabhakaran heads the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

Tamil Tiger leader Velupillai Prabhakaran - in battle fatigues (left) and more recently in civilian dress
Mr Prabhakaran has shed his military image

 

He has a reputation as a fearless and ruthless guerrilla leader, and under his leadership, the LTTE, or Tamil Tigers, have become a highly-disciplined and highly-motivated guerrilla force.

His organisation shows no sign of being defeated militarily by the Sri Lankan army, even though it is vastly outnumbered in its struggle for a Tamil homeland.

Mr Prabhakaran is reputed to wear a cyanide capsule around his neck, to be swallowed in the event of his capture.

He expects the same dedication from his troops, many of whom the Sri Lankan Government says are either women or children.

Enigmatic figure

Mr Prabhakaran inspires conflicting emotions in Sri Lanka - which reflect the divisions between the Sinhala and Tamil communities.

To his followers, he is a freedom fighter struggling for Tamil emancipation from Sinhala oppression. To his adversaries he is a megalomaniac with a brutal disregard for human life.

--> S IIMA --> ..> ..>
Tamil Tigers in Jaffna
Prabhakaran turned the rebels into a fearsome fighting force
--> E IIMA -->The Tamil Tiger leader seldom gives interviews to journalists, who are in any case restricted by the government from going into areas controlled by his forces.

His movements between his various jungle hideouts are the subject of great secrecy, and he is reported to have narrowly avoided assassination or capture on numerous occasions.

Born on 26 November 1954, in the northern coastal town of Velvettithurai, on the Jaffna peninsula, Velupillai Prabhakaran is the youngest of four children.

He was an average student, shy and bookish. He said in one of his rare interviews that he was fascinated by Napoleon and Alexander the Great, devouring books on their lives.

He was also influenced by the lives of two Indian leaders, Subhash Chandra Bose and Bhagat Singh, both of whom were involved in the armed struggle for independence from Britain.

Accused of killings

Angered as a teenager by what he saw as discrimination against Tamils in politics, employment and education, he began attending political meetings and practising martial arts.

He soon became heavily involved in the Tamil protest movement, and in 1975 was accused of being responsible for the murder of the mayor of Jaffna.

--> S IIMA --> ..> ..>
Former child soldiers demobilised under the peace process
Reports say the Tigers are still recruiting child soldiers
--> E IIMA -->That assassination was one of the first killings carried out by the burgeoning Tamil nationalist movement.

He was instrumental in the foundation of the Tamil Tigers around that time.

The killing of the mayor of Jaffna is not the only high-profile murder for which Mr Prabhakaran is the prime suspect.

He has also been accused by India of playing a key role in the murder of the former prime minister, Rajiv Gandhi, in 1991.

Mr Gandhi was killed by a suicide bomber who, the Indians say, was acting on orders from Mr Prabhakaran.

It is alleged that Mr Prabhakaran wanted to avenge the Indian prime minister's decision in the mid-1980s to deploy Indian peace-keeping troops in Sri Lanka.

Despite the conflicting views surrounding Mr Prabhakaran, there is one point on which both the Sinhala and Tamil communities agree: he is the dominating force in the rebel movement, and without his consent peace in Sri Lanka will never be attainable. --> E BO -->

--> S IIMA -->
Friday, July 13, 2007 

Saving Children from Mines

Unexploded ordnance and land mines put children's lives at risk in conflict affected eastern Sri Lanka. At UNICEF supported clubs children educate children on what to do if they discover the explosive devices

By Jens Laerke BATTICALOA, Sri Lanka

– One Friday afternoon, Varatharaj Thinesh was squatting on the ground in the small village of Murakotanchenai in an eastern district of Batticaloa, idly digging in the dirt with a bottle. With nothing better to do, he half-heartedly followed a discussion between some uncles and aunts nearby, and was just going about being a regular 14-year-old schoolboy with no particular plans for the afternoon.

Then the bottle in his hand scraped the rubber corner of an anti-personnel land mine and he came within a hair's breadth of losing life or limbs.

Now Thinesh sits at the very same spot educating friends from his Children's Club and other local children on the risk of mines and unexploded ordnance (UXO).

Thinesh is a child animator in a Mine Risk Education programme funded and coordinated by UNICEF in partnership with the Sri Lankan NGO Sarvodaya.

Thinesh was fortunate because he knew what to do when he realized he had accidentally unearthed a land mine which had floated into the Children's Club with the heavy monsoon rain. He didn't touch it, he didn't run away, he didn't panic – instead, he called on the grown-ups around so that they could alert the police and have it removed safely.

"Despite the mine I found, I do feel safe within the boundaries of the village because it has been cleared. But I don't know what is outside", says Thinesh.

 Message of caution

Mines and UXO do not respect any political peace agreements – once mines are laid or ammunition fired, they pose a threat for years, sometimes decades, to come. Mine clearance accompanied by Mine Risk Education can therefore take credit for the decline in casualties over the past years: The number of deaths and injuries in Batticaloa District has gone down from a high point of 31 in 2000 to 2 casualties in 2005. In Sri Lanka as a whole, the number of casualties has declined from 167 to 30 over the same period.

"I am happy that I can teach children something that they know nothing about but really have to be aware of" says Thinesh, who finds that his young audience responds well to the education. The Kanimoli Children's Club that Thinesh is member of is one of the 145 clubs in the 3 eastern district Batticaloa, Trincomalee, and Ampara affected by the war. In Batticaloa there are 40 clubs offering Mine Risk Education.

Today, Kanimoli has 60 members aged 6-17 years, but many more children from the area have already seen the educational mine risk programme. The program includes small drama pieces, with singing and dancing that engages children in the performance. It also raises awareness of the plight of children disabled by mines and UXO. First and foremost, however, it drums the message of caution into the young audience.

And caution is required in Murakotanchenai village which was deserted during the conflict, but re-populated after the ceasefire agreement in 2002. Next to the Children's Club is an army camp, a classic indicator that mines and UXO most probably are lying around.

Despite the obvious danger, Thinesh, his parents, and four brothers and sisters came back to the village after the ceasefire. They had been displaced by the war for most of the 1990s.

"We found around 15 mines and UXO when we came back, one of them on our way to school. My parents knew that this is a dangerous area - but this is where our house is", he explains before heading back to a group of some 30 children waiting in the club's yard for the day's programme.

source: http://www.unicef.org/srilanka/reallives_1712.htm?q=printme

Friday, July 13, 2007 

Internally Displaced Children in Sri Lanka: Trincomalee

By Katey Grusovin

Minha (7 years old) sits in her aunt's tent in Al Tharique School in Kantale which has become an IDP camp for people displaced by the continuing hostilities in Sri Lanka's volatile North East.

Like most people fleeing from the Muttur area, she too had to leave with her family and only the clothes she was wearing at the time. She wasn't even able to collect her slippers and had travel to Kantale in her bare feet. Minha used to attend Grade 4 in Muttur. Remembering her school and friends she said, "My school will start in one week. I hope we can go back home soon, so I don't miss my classes." School was due to resume on August 14 but has been delayed for a week by the education authorities given the uncertain situation.

Agencies are working with local authorities to find a solution to get children back to learning as soon as possible. Al Tharique School is one of 66 IDP sites that have sprung up in the District of Trincomalee, It is currently housing a population of 6333 IDPs, mainly from Muttur Division. 997 of are children and 3843 are women.

..> ..> ..>..>
UNICEF/ShehzadNoorani
© UNICEF/Shehzad Noorani
A girl child at the Ayesha Girls College IDP Camp in Kantale.

Sitting on the floor next to her sisters, a girl child read from a textbook she found lying around in the camp at Ayesha Girls College. Kantale in Trincomalee District.

Although most IDPs have been provided with some sort of shelter and other basic necessities like food and clothing by NGOs and local organizations - providing educational and psycho-social support still remains a major challenge. Most children do not have any textbooks or even toys to play with.

source: http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/images/ibc_srilanka_dancing.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/sri_lanka_36012.html&h=140&w=200&sz=14&hl=en&start=44&um=1&tbnid=_Bj5HW8mgkPrYM:&tbnh=73&tbnw=104&prev=/images%3Fq%3DSri%2BLanka%2BChildren%2Bpeace%2B%26start%3D42%26ndsp%3D21%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN

Friday, July 13, 2007 
Vijaraja Lakshumi takes pride in her son's appearance.

Every day she dresses him for school in a crisp white shirt, even though they live in a sun-blasted, dusty camp in eastern Sri Lanka.

Sumeshan is five years old, born as the ceasefire between the government and the Tamil Tigers was signed.

He should have been growing up in a country at peace - instead he's a displaced person in Sri Lanka's continuing war.

Political statement

"We couldn't stay at home because of the shelling," says his mother, sitting in the long, low hut with a roof of tarpaulin donated by the United Nations that they share with dozens of others.

"We travelled by river and through the jungle for three days before we finally got here."

The family is from Vakarai, a coastal hamlet that was controlled by the Tigers for more than a decade, until the security forces advanced in January. It was the last of a series of major rebel strongholds in the east to fall.

What seems to be shaping government policy now is a conviction that the Vijarajas and tens of thousands of others like them were not just fleeing the fighting, but making a political statement when they moved out of rebel territory.

"The people are leaving Prabhakaran [the leader of the Tigers] and he hates it," said Keheliya Rambukwella, a minister and government spokesman, at a recent media briefing.

He added that the rebels were holding civilians against their will to be used as human shields.

The belief that the Tamil people are losing heart with the Tigers is emboldening the government to dream of finding a solution to Sri Lanka's long-running ethnic conflict even if the rebels refuse to co-operate.

I don't want to pass this problem onto the next generation
..Emva-->..Smva-->
President Mahinda Rajapakse

Ministers want to separate what they describe as "Tiger terrorism" from the desire of Tamils for a fair stake in the political process.

Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse recently offered the rebels talks, but only if they laid down their arms first.

And no one expects the Tigers to come to the negotiating table from a position of weakness.

So the government intends to make the Eastern Province a model of how things could be if there was peace - encouraging perceived disaffection among the people in the large areas of the north the rebels still hold.

Large scale development schemes are on the drawing board.

Fillip

And there are plans for democracy too.

Many are doubtful that the president's long-term plan to bring peace to Sri Lanka can work

Provincial elections are likely, within perhaps six months, to choose a chief minister.

"Colonel" Karuna Amman, the renegade leader of the Tigers in the east who broke away with his fighters from the main Tiger group in 2004, is being talked of in official circles as a serious candidate.

His defection was a fillip for the government, which has denied repeatedly that his men have fought alongside the security forces.

Allegations have also been dismissed that the military turned a blind eye to him recruiting children as combatants in government-held areas.

President Mahinda Rajapakse was in an upbeat mood when I had lunch with him recently at Temple Trees, his heavily-guarded office compound in the centre of Colombo.

"I don't want to pass this problem on to the next generation," he said, as he proffered a plate of seafood salad.

The president's political manoeuvrings in Colombo have also made him more secure.

His was a minority government, but the offer of ministerial posts tempted 19 members of the opposition United National Party to join his ranks.

A nationalist party of monks, the JHU, later did the same, adding more seats.

Sri Lanka, a country of fewer than 20 million people, now has a cabinet that dwarfs that of giant neighbour India.

The defections brought tensions with Mr Rajapakse's Sri Lanka Freedom Party to a head.

Troublesome

Some ministers were disgruntled about having to give up portfolios and became loudly critical.

The president sacked three, including Anura Bandranaike, the scion of the family dynasty that ruled Sri Lanka for much of the time since independence.

Mr Bandranaike later apologised and was reinstated.

Few believe he has what it takes to follow his father, mother and sister to becoming Sri Lanka's leader.

Mangala Samaraweera, the former foreign, aviation and ports minister, remains outside the fold and could be more troublesome.

But many are doubtful that the president's long-term plan to bring peace to Sri Lanka can work.

A Western diplomat in Colombo wondered who the government would negotiate a settlement with if not with the Tigers.

And the American Ambassador, Robert Blake, publicly reiterated his belief that there can be no military solution to the conflict.

The rebels, too, remain a potent military force.

"We are not finished in the east," said Rasiah Ilanthirayan, the Tiger's military spokesman, recently. "We have gone into guerrilla mode."

And they retain control of much of the north, with well-armed cadres, artillery and even a naval wing, the Sea Tigers.

Suresh Premachandran is a member of parliament for Jaffna from the Tamil National Alliance, which some have viewed as a proxy party for the Tigers.

"We are fighting for a cause, we are fighting for the just rights of the Tamils," he said.

"That was our basic demand. But the government never addressed that question. They do have a feeling, even today they have a feeling, that they can eliminate the Tigers through violence, through military means, then the things will be over. It's not like that."

'Peace and prosperity'

And some analysts believe only a miracle can now rescue Sri Lanka from further conflict.

"Six years ago, the year before the ceasefire agreement was signed, we could not have believed that for four years we would enjoy a ceasefire of the sort we had," said Jehan Perera of the National Peace Council, which campaigns for a negotiated settlement.

"This is what makes me hopeful that there can be sudden changes that we cannot envisage, that will once again turn the situation round and bring peace and prosperity to our country."

Five-year-old Vijaraja Sumeshan and his family are trying to get on with their lives as best they can in the refugee camp.

They hope to be able to return to home soon.

The government says it will resettle the people of Vakarai once landmines in the area have been cleared.

But a lasting peace for all the people of Sri Lanka seems a long way off.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/6382787.stm

..Emva-->
Friday, July 13, 2007 
..> ..> ..>..>

The Sri Lankan government is planning to hold victory celebrations after troops seized the last Tamil Tiger rebel base in the restive east.

Officials say their capture of the rugged area of Thoppigala gives the government control of the region for the first time in 13 years.

They say the fall of Thoppigala is a triumph for the military.

The Tigers have responded with threats to cripple the economy with attacks on military and economic targets.

The leader of the rebels' political wing, SP Thamilselvan said peace was "not possible" with President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

"Our targets would be in the future major military and economic structures of the government of Sri Lanka," he told the Reuters news agency from the northern stronghold of Kilinochchi.

"They will be targets which help the government sustain its military operations and military rule.

"For instance (our) attack on the oil installations. That is one of the targets that will cripple the economy of Sri Lanka as well as the military capability of Sri Lanka, so such will be the tactic."

Tamil Tiger
The rebels say they will hit key economic targets

'Important success'

Government officials say there will be a "big event in Colombo in keeping with the success of the armed forces in Thoppigala".

Correspondents say its capture has dealt a significant blow to the Tamil dream of establishing an independent homeland in the nation's north and east.

The military offensive to recapture the east began last year. In January, troops dislodged the rebels from their eastern coastal strongholds in Batticaloa district.

Former Air Marshall Harry Goonetilleke told the AP news agency that the seizure of Thoppigala was an "important success" for the military, but keeping it would not be easy.

"You can win a battle with 2,000 troops, but to hold it you need 10,000 minimum," he said.

The Tigers still control large parts of northern Sri Lanka, where they run a de facto state.

But the government says that its troops have killed hundreds of rebels since February. The rebels dispute the casualty figures.

A ceasefire signed between the two sides in 2002 is still in place on paper in Sri Lanka, although it has broken down on the ground.

Much of the fighting up until now has taken place in the east.

More than 60,000 people have died since the rebels began fighting for an independent homeland in the north and east in the 1970s.

The Tigers say minority Tamils are discriminated against by the majority Sinhalese population... 


 
source: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/6895809.stm
Friday, June 29, 2007 

Monday, 26 March 2007, 16:14 GMT 17:14 UK

Whatever you may think of their goals and methods, Sri Lanka's Tamil Tigers have always been innovative.

.. S IIMA --> ..> ..>
A Tamil Tiger picture of bombs loaded beneath a plane
Experts say the technology was rudimentary but effective
.. E IIMA -->

It was they who refined the suicide bomber, and used them to devastating effect.

And what other insurgent groups can boast a naval wing? The rebels have boats armed with guns, known as the Sea Tigers.

Now they have confirmed what Sri Lanka's government had suspected for a long time - they have an air capability too.

The first mission of what the rebels are calling the Tamil Eelam Air Force, or TAF, took place overnight.

Two light aircraft - according to the government it might have been one - set off, presumably from a jungle airstrip in the north of the country, and flew south.

If they were detected they were not stopped.

Their target was the air force base at Katanayake, north of the capital.

They flew overhead and dropped several bombs, killing three airmen on the ground and wounding many more.

They also terrified passengers waiting for flights at the nearby international airport, some of whom described panic and chaos as people ran for cover amid the sound of explosions.

.. S IBOX --> ..> ..>
It's interesting, a bold effort... very Biggles
Colombo-based defence expert
.. E IBOX -->

As the air base echoed with the sound of machine gun fire the light aircraft turned around and flew back home.

The rebels have released photographs of the plane they said was responsible.

Pilots are shown wearing pale blue Tiger striped uniforms, in one shot grouped around the elusive rebel leader Vellupillai Prabhakaran.

There is no shot showing the entire aircraft, but the Sri Lankan Government believe it to be a Czech-designed Zlin-143. One picture shows four bombs mounted underneath the fuselage.

.. S IIMA -->

Graphic: Zlin-143

.. E IIMA -->

"It's a very basic system they seem to have put on their aircraft, very hit and miss," said one foreign defence expert based in Colombo.

"It's interesting though, a bold effort. To fly down at night and get back is quite a message to send. It's very Biggles."

Conflict-changing

The government says its air defence system was a success because the fighter jets housed in hangars at the air base were not damaged.

And there was nothing like the scale of damage caused in 2001, when a Tiger attack on the airport complex left half the national airline fleet in flames.

.. S IIMA --> ..> ..>
A Tamil Tigers picture of rebel leader Vellupillai Prabhakaran with the Tamil "air force"
Vellupillai Prabhakaran was pictured with the Tamil "air force"
.. E IIMA -->

But the Sri Lanka Air Force has launched an investigation into how the planes got through.

And the police have also launched an inquiry.

A spokesman, citing the ongoing investigation, refused to confirm reports they were looking into the possibility that Special Task Force police commandos had spotted the rebel aircraft flying in the north of the country up to an hour before they struck.

Analysts believe the attack has opened a new dimension in Sri Lanka's decades-long civil war.

"It changes the conflict completely," said Iqbal Athas of Jane's Defence Weekly.

"For two decades the fight has been confined to the land and the sea. Now we see the emergence of the air capability of the Tigers. It's the first time they've demonstrated the capability that they can not only use it, but get away."

And he pointed out that army camps, the homes of important figures, and naval craft at sea have suddenly become more vulnerable.

'More to come'

The Tigers said this would not be the last aerial attack.

"It is not only pre-emptive, it is a measure to protect Tamil civilians from the genocidal aerial bombardments by Sri Lankan armed forces," rebel military spokesman Rasiah Ilanthirayan told Reuters.

.. S IIMA --> ..> ..>
A wounded Sri Lankan soldier following a Tamil Tiger air raid
The military said it prevented the attack from being worse
.. E IIMA -->

"More attacks of the same nature will follow."

The air raid comes as the Tigers were seen to be facing setbacks on the ground.

In recent months they have been driven from many towns and villages along the coast in the Eastern province.

And one senior government figure has talked of defeating the rebels militarily within two to three years.

The government has long suspected that the rebels were trying to get aircraft, smuggling them in pieces to be assembled in their northern stronghold.

"It's not a new dimension," said military spokesman Brigadier Prasad Samarasinghe.

"They were constructing a runway about two or three years back. During the ceasefire agreement they have brought all these things. This is the first time they have come and they were successful in putting the bombs.

"But they were not successful as per the plan that they wanted as they couldn't destroy any air force facilities. Definitely this is not a major threat and it will be neutralised." .. E BO -->

Friday, June 15, 2007 

Friday, 15 June 2007, 09:13 GMT 10:13 UK

A panel set up to monitor a Sri Lankan probe into human rights abuses has warned the process will end in failure unless changes are made.

The International Independent Group of Eminent Persons (IIGEP) is worried about the involvement of the attorney general's department in the inquiry.

It has warned there are conflicts of interest by its participation.

The government has come under pressure over human rights as the country had slid back into civil war. .. E SF -->

'Lack of impartiality'

The report from international experts comes as Sri Lanka's President Mahinda Rajapaksa is in Geneva defending the country's human rights record.

The President's Commission was set up to look into a number of incidents that were blamed on the security forces and the Tamil Tiger rebels.

.. S IIMA --> ..> ..>
Bus attack in Kabithigollewa in June
Monitors also looking into alleged Tamil Tiger attacks
.. E IIMA -->

It includes the assassinations of politicians, and the killing of 17 workers from the French charity Action Against Hunger, which Nordic ceasefire monitors blamed on the military.

As part of efforts to make the inquiry transparent the international community nominated a group of experts to observe the process.

In their second report they have said they are concerned about the involvement of lawyers from the attorney general's department.

Abductions

The experts said they had "observed examples of a lack of impartiality", with counsel from the department stating "as fact matters which are controversial to the case".

The panel said the probe would end in failure unless independent lawyers are brought in.

The experts have also said they are concerned about the lack of an adequate witness protection programme, particularly amid many reports of abductions in the country.

The President's Commission has rejected the criticism from the experts saying it is satisfied the probe will yield results.

It also called for at least one member of the international panel to be in Sri Lanka to observe the proceedings.

Meanwhile Amnesty International has urged the president to ask the United Nations to set up a mission to monitor human rights in the country.

Ministers have previously rejected such a move, saying it would infringe on Sri Lanka's sovereignty... E BO -->


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6755749.stm

Tuesday, June 12, 2007 
There is nothing like the current renewal of negotiations between the government of Sri Lanka, and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to concentrate our minds on where and when things went wrong in Sri Lanka.

In most colonial societies, once the struggle for self rule is over and independence is achieved, contests over who should rule at home follow. These are generally ethnic and religious rather than class conflicts. In Sri Lanka where the passage to independence was negotiated rather than fought for, the second struggle was successfully avoided for nearly 10 years after independence. The key figure in this was D S Senanayake, the island's first Prime Minister (1947-52), and the principal negotiator for Sri Lanka's independence (1942-47). His great achievement was in keeping the country together. A close examination of his successful balancing act reconciling the legitimate interests and concerns of the majority and the minorities would provide lessons for those concerned with bringing peace to Sri Lanka's fractured polity.

The conflicts in Sri Lanka illustrate the operation of some of the most combustible factors in ethnic relations: language, religion, long historical memories of tensions and conflict, and a prolonged separatist agitation.

The current ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka is a much more complex business than a simple straightforward confrontation between a once well-entrenched minority-the Sri Lanka Tamils-and a now powerful but still insecure majority-the Sinhalese. The Sinhalese majority and the Sri Lanka Tamil minority are not the only players in this intricate political drama even though, at present, they play the principal roles. Suffice it to say here that there are two conflicting perceptions of these conflicts. Most Sinhalese believe that the Tamil minority has enjoyed a privileged position under British rule and that the balance has of necessity to shift in favour of the Sinhalese majority. The Sri Lanka Tamil minority is an achievement-oriented, industrious group who still continue to enjoy high status in society, considerable influence in the economy, a significant if diminishing role in the bureaucracy and is well placed in all levels of the education system. The Tamils for their part would claim that they are now a harassed minority, the victims of frequent acts of communal violence and calculated acts and policies of discrimination directed at them. Most of the Tamils' fears and their sense of insecurity stem from the belief that they have lost the advantageous position they enjoyed under British rule in many sectors of public life in the country; in brief, a classic case of a sense of relative deprivation.
 

II.The Seeds of the Conflict and Earlier Efforts at its Management and Resolution

Despite the tensions and violence that have been a feature of life in post-independence Sri Lanka, there has been an irrepressible strand of pragmatism, which eventually helped in moderating the outcome of many of the very contentious issues. For instance, religious strife in the form of tensions and conflict between Buddhists and Christians-in particular the Buddhists and Roman Catholics-one of the most divisive factors in Sri Lankan public life for about 80 years or so beginning in the last quarter of the 19th century, has ceased to be a contentious issue in politics since the early 1970s. The point needs to be made, and as emphatically as possible, not merely that these religious disputes were principally among the Sinhalese themselves, between the Christians and Buddhists, and not between the latter and the Tamils, but also that religious tensions are only of very limited significance in the current conflict between the Sinhalese and Tamils.

1956 saw the passage of the Sinhala Only Act in parliament. The Act made Sinhala the sole official language and was the catalyst for heightened tensions between the Tamil and Sinhalese communities that eventually resulted in ethnic riots that year and more serious riots two years later. The accommodation reached in language policy after the violence associated with the introduction of language policy reform in 1956, is significant. Modifications initiated between 1956 and 1978, through political necessity (in 1958) and a realistic adjustment to life in a plural society (1978), all but conceded parity of status to the Tamil language with Sinhala. The clauses on language in the constitution of 1978 reflected a recognition of an existing reality. The explicit reversion to parity of status to the two languages, which came in 1987 and 1988 as a part of a political settlement brokered by the Indian government, was also a recognition of this.

The bitterness underlying the controversies on employment is explained in part by the conflict between Tamils' traditional anxiety to maintain the levels of employment in the state services they had grown accustomed to under British rule and the attempts of Sinhalese to insist on what they regard as their legitimate share of it.

After independence, competition for posts in the public service increased, especially with the rapid expansion of educational opportunities in the Sinhalese areas. This greatly reduced the prospects of the Tamils in their traditional search for positions in government service. Over the next twenty-five years they would be overtaken in almost every sector of state employment and in the professions by the Sinhalese, overtaken but far from being overwhelmed. For a while they retained their advantageous position in some of the professions-medicine, law and engineering-but lost it by the early 1980s. This represented the intellectual capital of the past, carefully gathered, and protected and augmented but, in their eyes, not expanding rapidly enough to overcome what they saw as the disadvantages of the new policy changes which would adversely affect the next generation of Tamils.

Changes in university admissions policy have contributed substantially and dramatically to the sharp deterioration of ethnic relations in Sri Lanka in the last three decades, and to radicalising the politics of the Tamil areas in the north and east of the island. The crux of the problem was that the Sri Lanka Tamils who constitute no more than an eighth of the island's total population, had a dominant position in the science-based faculties of the then University of Ceylon at Peradeniya and Colombo. In 1970, for instance, the Tamils gained just over 35 percent of the admissions to the science-based faculties; in Engineering and Medicine it was as high as 40%. In 1970, the United Front coalition led by Sirimavo Bandaranaike introduced a fundamental change by instituting a system of standardisation of marks by language media at the university entrance examination. The effect of this was to place the Tamil students at a disadvantage in that they had to obtain a higher aggregate of marks to enter the university-in the medical, science and engineering faculties-than the Sinhalese. Thereafter, a district quota system was also introduced which gave weightage to students in rural areas and from backward communities. All this represented a departure from the traditional practice of selecting students on the basis of actual marks obtained at an open competitive examination. The Tamils, justifiably, saw this change in university entrance policy as patently and deliberately discriminatory.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s the newly-elected UNP government changed this policy, and moved towards a more equitable university admissions system, a mixture of district quotas and merit, and affirmative action for rural areas-Sinhalese, Tamil and Muslim. Nevertheless memories of the unilateral and discriminatory change in university policy made in the early 1970s still remain fresh in the minds of Tamils, although the policy has been changed, and despite the very substantial expansion of university places in medicine and engineering that has taken place after 1979 providing greater opportunities to students from all sections of the population. The Tamils' share of places in the engineering and medical faculties has varied from 35% to 25% since 1978-79, to very recent times when it has fallen to around 15%.
Next, there is the accommodation reached on one of the long-standing grievances of the Tamils, the distribution of state-owned land among landless peasants. Tamil politicians have generally claimed that the Sri Lankan state has used state-owned land as a means of changing the demographic pattern in what they-i.e. the Tamil politicians-call the "Traditional Homelands of the Tamils," primarily state-owned land in the Eastern Province. Researchers have shown how little validity there is in these criticisms, but advocates of the Tamil cause have persisted with them nevertheless and through sheer repetition these charges have gained widespread acceptance among Tamil politicians and Tamil scholars.

Finally, we turn to the most intractable problem of all-devolution of political power. Differences of opinion over devolution have proved to be altogether more difficult to resolve. And this was despite the great deal that has been achieved between 1980 and 1987 in establishing a second tier of government, a major political achievement given the failure of previous attempts made in 1957-58, and 1965-68. Politicians are caught between the Sinhalese electorate's deep-rooted suspicions about the political consequences of devolving more power to the provinces and the Tamils' insistence on transferring greater extents of power to the provinces or regions at the expense of the central government, their demands ranging from the creation of a large Tamil-dominated North-Eastern Province, to the establishment of a federal political structure with a weak centre and more powerful provinces or regions. This is quite apart from the LTTE's insistence on a separate state as a non-negotiable demand.

Those in the forefront of the Tamils' agitation for devolution of power have always been vague, deliberately or unconsciously, in the terminology used in their arguments, and the distinction between provincial autonomy, states' rights in a federal union, and a separate state have been blurred by a fog of verbiage, and obfuscation. The close links that were established in more recent times between Tamil political groups ranging from the TULF to various separatist groups, with the government and opposition in the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, have naturally aggravated the situation, and more so the establishment of training camps in Tamil Nadu for separatist activists who made forays into the northern and eastern coastal regions of Sri Lanka from these. The result is that decentralisation, which was and should be, a purely Sri Lankan matter has taken on a cross-national dimension of which India's role as mediator in the political negotiations between the Sri Lankan government and representatives of Tamil opinion in the 1980s was the most conspicuous feature.

Pressure for decentralisation of administration is limited to the Tamils, and largely to the Tamils living in the north and east of the island, where they are either a majority or form a substantial minority. There is no pressure-on the contrary strong opposition to it-from other ethnic groups. Quite apart from the opposition of the Sinhalese majority to most schemes of devolution of power, the Muslim minority, especially those living outside the Eastern Province, have been deeply concerned about the dangers of their political marginalisation in a decentralised political and administrative structure.

One of the unfortunate consequences of concentrating attention on district and provincial units, and on supra-provincial units has been a neglect of one of the less controversial and more viable forms of decentralisation-local government institutions at the municipal and urban council levels and village council levels.


III . Towards Reconciliation and Reconstruction

As the analysis of earlier parts of this essay would show, one of the answers to the question of how it all went wrong in Sri Lanka, lies in the adoption of majoritarian policies to quicken the pace of changes that had already begun, in a short-sighted attempt to secure immediate gains-e.g. the language policy of 1956, and the university admission policies of 1970-71. Once opposition to these policies emerged, and it came soon enough in the first case (language reforms) in the form of ethnic tensions and riots, the attempts at modifications of these policies, or even a reversal of them, have proved to be much less effective in repairing the damage than they could have been. The attempts at removing grievances on a piecemeal basis, resorted to in the case of language policy from 1958 and thereafter in the 1970s and 1980s and in the case of university admission policies in the late 1970s and 1980s, have had less of a positive impact than was anticipated.

The first policy option then is to emphasize the inappropriateness of purely "majoritarian" decision-making in sharply divided societies. On the basis of the empirical evidence from Sri Lanka it would be true to say that the ethnic tensions have generally occurred whenever governments have either totally disregarded, or paid less attention than they should have, to the legitimate interests and concerns of minorities. After 1977 tensions have persisted or have erupted in violence despite the efforts of governments to take into consideration the legitimate interest of minorities, in devising new policies, or seeking a reversal of policies which have contributed to the current conflict. What this demonstrates is that in periods of prolonged ethnic conflict, it is extremely difficult to reverse a trend.

Second, where sharp cleavages exist in societies, political stability is ensured, if not guaranteed, by devising institutional arrangements giving minorities easy access to the highest decision-making processes. By doing so minorities would have sense that their opinions have been considered in devising policies, and in their implementation. Sri Lanka' record in this regard has been more constructive and imaginative than its recent history of the persistence of ethnic tensions and frequent eruptions of violence would lead us to believe.
Thirdly, where religious or linguistic divisions have deep historical roots, political stability could be ensured by a deliberate lowering of expectations on both sides of the divide. Just as a majority group who believe that they have been the principal victims of the imposition of colonial rule should resist the temptation to adopt policies that would hasten the redress of historical grievances, so too a minority group should desist from making exaggerated claims and demands. What is needed is a process of mutual lowering of expectations. Although the processes of government are then often reduced to a prosaic and humdrum search for areas of agreement between contending groups or factions within those groups, it has had the great benefit of keeping the peace in a sharply divided society.

* K M de Silva is Executive Director, International Centre for Ethnic Studies, Kandy, Sri Lanka and Emeritus Professor of Sri Lanka History, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

source: http://www.lankalibrary.com/pol/background.htm

Tuesday, June 12, 2007 
..> ..>
Playing Politics
By Joe Kainz
 
Copyright © 2000 STAR Group Limited
 
..> ..>
Now the life of a Buddhist monk – you'd think – would be one of quiet contemplation, meditation and prayer. And not one mired in the dirty and sometimes undignified world of politics. Yet across Asia there many are examples of monks who've abandoned their traditional way of life. In Korea, monks waged pitched battles against each other for the control of the country's most important Chogye order. In Myanmar many were killed by troops during anti government protests in 1988. Now in Sri Lanka another group is flexing its political muscles – stirring outrage and controversy in the process. Joe Kainz has the story.

(Musicians)

Celebrating a transition.

This novice Buddhist monk is being welcomed into a whole new world.

(Dancing)

These monks though are being ordained into a very different order: Politics. In the April 2004 elections an unprecedented nine monks won seats in Sri Lanka's parliament. All describe themselves as reluctant travellers on the JHU or National Heritage Party ticket.

Kotapola Amarakeethi, Chairman National Heritage Party says: "Ever since I was a novice monk, getting into politics has never crossed my mind. In Sri Lanka, even the subject is distasteful. None of us wanted to get involved this way, but since ancient times when the nation has faced difficulties – the monks have stepped forward to help find solutions. "

(Kids chanting)

The venerable Kotapola Amarakeerthi balances his new job with old duties – such as preaching to school kids about the merits of honouring parents and protecting the environment.

In fact many of the successful monastic political candidates were those considered best at delivering sermons like these.
And lessons taught here have been translated into party goals.

Kotapola Amarakeerthi says: "We want a realistic alternative to the traditional way politics has been conducted here. The crime, corruption and cheating you find in politics causes great suffering, difficulty and unrest. It's time for an alternative. We are trying to make a new administration based on good Buddhist principles."

But others say the path to enlightenment is not the best preparation for handling the weighty issues of state.

Jehan Perera, National Peace Council says: "They're really not politicians, they're community leaders. They are people with a lot of credibility - people have a lot of affection and regard for them. But in coming into politics, which is absolutely new for them, they have found, I think, that they are out of their depth."

(Chanting)

Sri Lanka's Buddhist men of the cloth are no strangers to political activity regularly appearing in rallies like this one.

Some have even been linked to political assassinations.

One of their primary complaints, a belief that the government has given too many concessions to the Tamil Tiger rebels. And a fear that foreign influences were undermining Sri Lanka's Sinhalese and Buddhist roots.

Dr. Ellawala Medhananda, Leader National Heritage Party says: "There is an illegal and unethical movement in this country to forcibly convert Buddhists to Christianity. In addition, we were seeing the nation being separated into two. Our 25-hundred year old Buddhist civilization and the majority Sinhalese nation is in danger of being destroyed. It is such a chaotic situation."

Sri Lanka's political active monks say their Buddhist faith will help them adapt from life in the temples to life in parliament. But their critics argue they are too naïve to be truly effective in the dirty world of politics.
Some of the harshest criticism comes from the guardians of Sri Lankan Buddhism's holiest shrine the famous Temple of the Tooth in Kandy. Monks here say their brethren have gone too far.

Professor Warakawe Dhammaloka, Senior Secretary of Asgiriya Chapter says: "In fact it would be better if they resign. Yes in history we have had monks who have been politically active, but they have never contested elections. Even Lord Buddha's advice has been that monks should be close to kings, but never become one. By contesting elections, they have disgraced the clergy and have left themselves unable to achieve any of the pledges they made to voters."

Dhammaloka says if the Heritage Party monks want political power they should take a similar path to that of the late Rambukwelle Sri Vipassi.

Though he never held office his influence with presidents and prime ministers was reflected in the military honours he was given at his recent funeral.

Kandy's monks say that if had become an MP it would only have diminished his role.

Professor Warakawe Dhammaloka says: "These nine seats could've been used to benefit Buddhism in the country, but the monks who have been elected have begun to overestimate themselves and are taking a more political stance in parliament. So what I feel is that the way they behave in parliament has created more problems for us and will continue to do so in future. They are being fooled by the votes they gained because they are popular monks and don't realize they are being used."

Within days of the elections the monks were at the centre of political intrigue. Sri Lanka's parliament had no simple majority.
The group of nine suddenly held the balance of power.

When the monks declared their independence a power struggle ensued with allegations of monks defecting and even being held 'hostage.'

And culminating in an ugly brawl in parliament during which two monks were allegedly assaulted.

Jehan Perera says: "Suddenly they found themselves in the middle, the vortex of politics and in a divided way and in a highly controversial way."

It is a concern shared by leading religious laymen in the country.

The custodian of the temple of the tooth says Sri Lanka's monks should take a cue from other predominantly Buddhist countries.

Neranjan Wijeyeratne, Chief Lay Custodian of the Tooth says: "They are higher than the politicians, why should they go and get involved in this dirty politics? They must give advice to laymen how to do because in Thailand, the monks they don't have a voting right. The monks won't get involved in politics."

But the MP monks say to quit now would be a mistake.

Dr. Ellawala Medhananda, Leader , National Heritage Party says: "Lord Buddha himself faced enormous challenges. So did his disciples and other followers. So those who say we are naïve or inexperienced do not understand the willpower and determination of a Buddhist monk and of Buddhism itself."

The new monastic parliamentarian credited with the most political experience agrees.

He insists that the path to power does not compromise his faith.

Athuraliye Rathana, spokesman, National Heritage Party says: "In my life, we have religion, politics and everything – interconnected. Why they depart from each other?"

The venerable Kotapola is also determined to stay the course.
Kotapola Amarakeerthi says: "We can't help but get involved, and we'll stay until we convince our countrymen that our view is the correct one."

But they have yet to achieve that task in Sri Lanka's rural areas where traditionally the Buddhist clergy enjoy the greatest support.

In the recent election the politicised monks did well only in urban areas.

If they can win the support of Sri Lanka's conservative heartland the monastic MPs may prove themselves true politicians.
 
Bhikkus - the new gender of politicians

By Aesop

Bhikkhus are a common sight on political platforms today. We now have even
bhikkhu parliamentarians elected directly and indirectly by the people. But, say prior
to early forties, the sight of a Buddhist monk on a political platform would have
amazed the people, and in fact shocked the devout Buddhists, Upasakas and
Upasakaammas

A bhikkhu becoming an MP was unthinkable in those days. Even at the time, the Eksat
Bhikkhu Peramuna spearheaded the MEP parliamentary election campaign in 1956
there was a general acceptance that though Buddhist monks may have their say in
politics a political career was certainly taboo for them.

In this context the writer wishes to quote what Ven. Udagaladeniye Somawansa Thera
says in his book titled 'Bauddha Bhiksuwage aagameeka Sarnajayeeka karyabaraya'
(The Religious and social role of a bhikkhu) "Deshapalana bhiksu yai rate jathiya
yahapatha udesa katayuthukala bhikshunta apabasaathmakawa katha kalath kisidaka
bhikshun parlimentu manthrikam sandaha kara netha, tharanga karaneda netha"
(although the Buddhist monks who have worked for the good of the country and the
nation are being disparagingly referred to as 'political bhikkhus', bhikkhus have never
contested the parliamentary election nor will they ever contest in the future).

It was in the late forties the new phenomenon called 'political bhikkhus' appeared in
the horizon of Sri Lanka politics for the first time.

The patriarchs of Maha Sangha once considered that their younger brethren should
not engage in politics ridden with partisanship and bitter cut-throat rivalry without
observing the tenets of 'Pratimoksha' discipline in the breach Therefore, they frowned
on the young monks taking to active politics. In this context the writer would like to
recount an anecdote he had heard from his village elders, about how the
Viharadhipathi of the village temple pulled up a young monk for dabbling in politics.

This Viharadhipathi, a chief Sanganayake of two districts was highly respected for the
hermit like virtuous and disciplined life he led. The political bhikkhu he wanted to
reprimand was an author of several books and an orator who openly supported the
Communist party. (Later of course, he retracted his political views and that is another
story) At this time, the slogan 'Save the Sasana from irreligious Sama-Samajists was
fast gaining ground in the country. Some monks who thought that the particular
'political monk' was backing a political ideology prejudicial to the Buddha Sasana
complained about his activities to the Sanganayake Thera.

The Nayake Thera immediately summoned the errant monk, and the latter soon after
appeared before him. Having paid obeisance to the Nayake Thera in customary
fashion, 'errant' monk stood on a side and respectfully waited for the elderly monk to
break the ice.

"I sent for the Sthavira, because I was told that the Sthavira has embraced some
political doctrine opposed to Buddhism," Nayake Thera told the young bhikkhu.

"What is the heretic doctrine I am supposed to have embraced, Venerable Sir?, the
young monk asked.

"I am told it is a doctrine called 'Sama Samaja' that is aimed at destroying the Buddha
Sasana".

"Loku-hamuduruwo has been misinformed," replied the young monk. "I am only a
Communist, not a Sama Samajist".

"Ah! Is that so? Then there is some misunderstanding, Sthavira, you may go back to
your temple," said the Nayake Thera dismissing the matter

This anecdote illustrative of the naivety of some elderly Bhikkhus of a bygone era
about certain mundane or secular matters is still being recalled by the people in the
area with a guffaw.

The Nayake Thera of this anecdote like most patriarchs of his times believed that
politics was a vocation meant only for the laity, and something that the Sangha should
not touch with a bargepole. A valuable tradition set by this Nayake Thera continues to
this date :that is the monks of his temple not only shun politics, but also refrain from
voting at elections.

It should be said to the credit of the few bhikkhus who entered the political arena in
early forties, they were not motivated by narrow chauvinistic objectives. These
bhikkhus mostly Marxist-oriented were inspired by humanitarian ideals transcending
religious, ethnic, caste and parochial barriers. They were liberal thinkers fashioned by
the "Ehi Passika!" (come and examine) spirit of Buddhism. By some strange
coincidence almost all these monks who came to be labelled 'political bhikkhus' in
early forties were products of the Vidyalankara Pirivena, Peliyagoda. Meanwhile some
of their contemporaries who hailed from Vidyalankara Pirivena made their mark in the
field of Sinhala Literature.

Prominent among 'the political bhikkhus' in early forties were Ven. Dr. Walpola Rahula
Thera, Ven. Udakendawela Sirisarankhara and Ven. Narawila Dhammaratana. When
they were adding colour and vigour to the country's leftist movements, bhikkhus such
as Ven. Bambarende Siri Seevali Thera, Ven. Kotahene Pagngnakitti Thera and Ven.
Dr. Kotagama Vachissara Thera, revolutionised the thinking of the contemporary
society with their copious writings Ven. Kalalelle Ananda Sagara Thera, who was a
leading light in the field of literature – he was a poet par excellence- briefly served the
country as a Parliamentarian.

'The political bhikkhus' of the early forties did not espouse narrow sectarian causes
unlike those who spearheaded, the Eksath Bhikkhu Peramuna of 1956. The former
greatly influenced by Marxism stood for democratic ideals and social justice and
actively participated in common man's struggles for fairplay and justice.

In more recent times Ven. Baddegama Samita Thera followed in the footsteps of great
bhikkhus like Ven. Dr. Walpola Rahula.

The entry of Buddhist monks into the political arena to espouse the Sinhala Buddhist
cause in 1956 marked the beginning of a new era of the post independent Sri Lanka
which saw a tragic end to centuries – old friendship and co-existence between the two
main communities culminating in the virtual division of the country.

It is a historical truth that the ethnic divide between the Sinhalese and the Tamils
began to widen since 1956 and the Sinhala only Act set off the time-bomb. It is a sad
commentary that the bhikkhus who should have really acted as a catalyst for National
harmony were largely responsible not only for the communal disturbances that
followed but also for frustrating all attempts made to work out a lasting solution to the
ethnic issue ever since. How the nationalist bhikkhus took to streets when the late Mr.
S.W.R.D.,Bandaranaike and the late Mr.Dudley Senanayake tried to grant a measure
of self administration to the Tamil community in North-East is now part of history.

Even almost six decades of communal disharmony marked by death and destruction,
untold misery and suffering both in the war-theatre and outside it do not appear to
have made our political bhikkhus of the 1956 origin any wiser.

The Jatika Hela Urumaya bhikkhus are yet to reconcile themselves to the stark reality
that we are a pluralist and secular nation. They are blissfully ignorant of the fact that
the continuity of a Sinhala Buddhist majoritarian rule would mean a divided country-
perpetuation of Velupillai Prabakaran's sway over one third of the country with two
thirds of the island's coast line. It is a pity that a large section of the Sinhala Diaspora
in Australia in particular is lending moral and material support from a safe distance for
the JHU to beat their war drums.

Ever since it won representation in parliament, the JHU was being gripped by a
credibility crisis.

They first told the electorate that their objective was to usher in a 'Dharmarajaya'.
That was a mere slogan and they had no agenda to pursue to attain their Utopian
goal. Later the monks found themselves adrift buffeted by political currents. They
vowed not to align themselves with either of the two main political parties. But soon
they forgot their avowed stand and decided to support the candidature of Prime
Minister Mahinda Rajapakse because of his assurance to ensure the unitary status of
the country.

The JHU which came to parliament on the wave of a Buddhist nationalist upsurge
generated by the late Ven.Gangodawila Soma Thera, is now fast losing its urban
middle class vote base. The JHU suffered the first blow when the respected monk
Ven. Kolonnawe Sumangala Thera resigned utterly disillusioned. The party's very
foundation cracked when later the Hela Urumaya founder Tilak Karunaratne left the
party and joined the UNP. The third fatal blow it received was the defection of popular
monk Ven. Uduwe Dhammaloka Thera.

The JHU is a party in death throes. When it is no more, let us say a collective prayer
that there be no more political bhikkhus to espouse ethnic nationalism ever in Sri
Lanka.!.

The JHU's commitment to a unitary Lanka is based on fallacy. The term 'unitary' it
looks, is something sacred to them; in their opinion no country is sovereign if its
government is not unitary in character! They day-dream of the day when Prabakaran
meekly lays down his arms and says: 'I surrender for peace on your terms' or our
three armed forces swing into action and wipe the LTTE off the face of the earth in
one fell sweep without shedding a drop of blood! When this dream comes true every
Sri Lankan will live in a unitary Sri Lanka happily ever after!
[Courtesy: Daily Mirror]
source: http://www.lankalibrary.com/pol/monks.htm
Tuesday, June 12, 2007 
..> ..>
Selfish politicians let Sri Lanka down
 
@ Latheef Farook  Special to Gulf News


After four and half centuries of European colonial rule, when Sri Lanka became independent in 1948, Dubai was an undeveloped emirate without even basic facilities, Indian university degrees were not recognised in Sri Lanka and Singapore leaders vowed to turn their island into a Sri Lanka, which was then a Third World role model for economic prosperity, political stability and communal harmony.

But 55 years later, Sri Lanka is locked in never-ending political turmoil, its economy ruined by two decades of armed conflict and consequential devastating impact on life.

Dubai, now a prosperous city state, is running Sri Lanka's flag carrier Sri Lankan Airline and Sri Lankan students are rushing for admissions to schools and universities in India, while Indian entrepreneurs aggressively penetrate many sectors of the island's economy. And Singapore is a highly developed country.


How did this happen?

The blame rests solely on the Colombo ruling class which control the two main political parties - ruling United National Party under Senanayakes, Jayawardenes and now their relative Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe and the Sri Lanka Freedom Party under the all powerful President Chandrika Bandaranaike and her family.

Known for their links to British colonial rulers most of them were Christians but embraced Buddhism, the religion of the largest majority, after entering national politics.

The tragedy was that the two parties which dominated the political scene since independence adopted short sighted policies aimed only at the next election and not the next generation or the country's long term interest.

Every time they spoke of national interest they only meant their own interests. The intense personal rivalries within the ruling class continues to date, to the detriment of the country. This was demonstrated by the crisis triggered on November 4 after Chandrika fired three key ministers and suspended parliament.

Leading columnists accused the two parties of being solely responsible for turning this once prosperous country, with all its wealth of human and natural resources and peaceful people, into one of the most mismanaged countries in the world.

Alienating the minorities

Instead of exploiting the gains under colonial rule to ensure further growth, the two parties competed with each other, indulging in communal politics aimed at Sinhalese votes, alienating the minorities. This trend, which emerged in the mid 1950s under Chandrika's father S.W.R.D. Bandaranaike founder of SLFP, continued with greater intensity in subsequent years. Frequent communal violence against minorities deeply divided communities sowing seeds of enmity and bitterness for future conflict.

It was in such atmosphere the late Prime Minister Srimavo Bandaranaike's government passed the 1970 constitution depriving minorities of the safeguard enshrined in the previous Soulbury constitution, driving Tamil political parties to bury their differences and unite under the banner of Tamil United Liberation Front, TULF which, in turn fanned communalism in the North dividing communities further.

But the Colombo ruling class failed to read the emerging threat to national unity and territorial integrity, especially in the context of widespread sympathy for Sri Lankan Tamils from the southern Indian state of Tamilnadu.

In the late 1970s President J.R. Jayawardene got an excellent opportunity to sort out the minority problem when his party was voted to power with an overwhelming majority and the entire country was behind him. But Jayewardene made things worse by his 1978 constitution which further frustrated and isolated the minorities.

In this desperate environment his failure to stop the July 1983 massacre of innocent Tamils forced Tamil youth to take to arms. The result is around 65,000 killed, 800,000 displaced, around 700,000 fleeing, 300,000 children displaced and more than 30,000 war widows.

The economy was shattered and billions of rupees wasted in fighting a war which neither side won. Once the Tamil Tiger guns started silencing all voices of dissent even mainstream Tamil political parties and politicians became irrelevant as seen today.

Fed up with long years of killings and destruction people wanted a peaceful solution to ethnic issue acceptable to all communities and wisdom dawned on the leaders in the south too on the need for a negotiated settlement.

But personal rivalry remained the greatest obstacle.

For example Chandrika, voted to power in 1994 with 62.2 per cent of the vote, offered regional councils on federal lines in her August 2000 draft constitution which was torn and burnt in the Parliament by the UNP led by Ranil Wickremasinghe who, according to Chandrika, had agreed to more than 90 per cent of the contents and assured his support. Thus she failed to solve the ethnic crisis.

Once again Ranil Wickremasinghe, voted to power on December 5, 2001 on a peace plank, signed a ceasefire agreement with Tamil Tiger rebels in February 2002. Fighting stopped and the country enjoyed a period of peace though the Tamil Tiger rebels exploited the situation to strengthen their military power provoking people in the south.

Submitted their proposals

Despite peace there was uncertainty all over and now, four days after Tamil Tiger rebels submitted their proposals for an "Interim Self Governing Authority" regarded by majority Sinhalese as prelude to a separate state, Chandrika sacked ministers and suspended the parliament shifting the focus of political debate from the LTTE proposals to PA-UNF conflict.

Tamil Tigers may ask for the sun and the moon and try to sideline Muslims in the constitutional arrangement, but leaders in the South have their own limitations in appeasing and accommodating them.

Yet the need is compromise from all sides, although difficult and complex, between the ruling élite too, political unity among democratic civil society and reforms for a realistic negotiated settlement to transform the current crisis into opportunity.

The country is passing through one of its most crucial stages in its history threatening its very survival and failure means unpredictable consequences. And future generations will never forgive the present set of leaders and history is bound to be very harsh on them.

 

source: http://www.lankalibrary.com/pol/let_down.htm