MySpace

SHOUTING FROM THE ROOFTOPS Blogging Against Injustice

AniMEL

Mel Maguire


Last Updated: 11/19/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 31
Sign: Libra

City: Scottsdale
State: Arizona
Country: US
Signup Date: 7/9/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
October 14, 2009 - Wednesday 3:53 AM
So I was perusing the newest poll questions on Facebook (you can find me both there and on Myspace via my name, Mel Maguire, or my email address, animelmaguire@gmail.com), and came across one that nearly made me snort my protein shake all over the keyboard. It gave me a mixture of utter shock and hysterical laughter. Here was the question:

“Do you think Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck are traitors and should be tried and put in prison?”

If the question wasn’t loaded enough, here were the possible responses (I kid you not, this was word-for-word):

A. Hell Yes
B. Yes
C. No
D. Hell no, I am stupid and believe everything they say

Now, there was a little bit of talk about traitorism after 9/11 and what constitutes a traitor. Some Republicans even went as far as suggesting that those who wouldn’t support the troops were un-American. But how often did we ever suggest, with a straight face, that protesters who peacefully exercised their First Amendment rights be tried for treason and tossed in the clink?

I can’t think of one. Even Limbaugh, Hannity and Beck didn’t go that far. Hell, Hannity invites those guys onto his show on a nightly basis, and he’s NICE to them. What kills me is that the snot-nosed little brat who wrote this poll question for Facebook users isn’t the first person I’ve heard such a ludicrous idea from. I’ve heard people I thought to be fairly level-headed say these kind of things out loud.

I have to ask the liberals out there who agree with this nonsense: what, pray tell, makes these guys traitors? I’ve said things far worse than what Hannity has said, and I’ve agreed with Limbaugh and Beck in the past. Does that mean I need to go to prison, too? What the hell makes those of us who share these conservative ideals traitors?

(Wait, I forgot…I’m a lesbian and I’m conservative, I’m naturally a traitor!)

Meanwhile, back on the farm…

In a country where even outright threats that include detailed acts of severe violence can go entirely unnoticed, it floors me that anybody can even think that those who obey the law should be punished simply for what they think. How is it that a Muslim can openly call for Jews to be assaulted with drain cleaner, rocks on their windshields and murder and get away with it while the portion of our population that demands tolerance calls for the imprisonment of a group of people simply because they espouse views not in line with their version of “tolerance”?

You amaze me. But here’s what’s really absolutely hilarious about our idiotic poll question of the day…the first choice in the poll? It got 11%. The second? 3.4%. The third?

82.3%.

That was out of 34,141 votes. I guess the view some think is popular isn’t all it’s cracked up to be after all.

(Footnote: RTD protein shakes aren’t all that great when ingested the way nature intended. When you attempt, deliberately or not, to process them through your nasal cavity, they’re really bad.)
October 14, 2009 - Wednesday 2:32 AM
Joseph Cohen was born an Orthodox Jew. He attended rabbinical school. Then he converted to Islam. Today, he is known as Yousef al-Khattab, and he drives a pedicab (bicycle cab) in New York City. He’s also the guy who created and maintains revolutionmuslim.com.

Here was one of his most recent missives, and you’d think it would cause quite the uproar:
Ya Allah(Oh God) I beseech You to carry out your wrath on the Jewish occupiers of Palestine & their supporters.
Ya Allah(Oh God) please throw liquid drain cleaner in their faces.
Ya Allah(Oh God) burn their flammable sukkos while they sleep.
Ya Allah(Oh God),make rocks crash through their car windows as they drive in Your land Bayit al Maqdes
Ya Allah(Oh God), make their fingers and brains stick on cafe walls from impact.
Ya Allah(Oh God) answer my duaa (prayer)
Sincerely,
Yousef al-Khattab
He goes on to say this is “only a prayer” and accuses a Rabbi of inciting violence for anti-Arab genocide. Then he fails to include the Rabbi’s name, words or the date or place that the supposed words were spoken. Frankly, I’ve never heard a Rabbi call for genocide, so al-Khattab is full of it IMO.

FOX is the only news organization so far that’s putting this story out there the way it should be. I can’t even find a blurb on any of the major news organizations’ websites. I wonder…where are all the nutjobs who claim Christians are the cause of all of the anti-gay hate crimes in America right now?

You won’t find this kind of incitement on any American Christian website (no, Phelps still doesn’t count–but even HE won’t go this far) against any group. Not even Muslims are as vehemently hated by Christians as Jews are by Muslims. And this is becoming commonplace, so much so that it simply isn’t news anymore.

I daresay that it isn’t news anymore because there are plenty of anti-Semitic cowards in the halls of power at the MSM networks who would actually agree with this drivel.
Note to anti-Christian protesters: what you just read is true hate speech. If you’re not willing to call it for what it is with the same overhyped outrage, then stop pointing the finger.

Note to al-Khattab: if that is your prayer, then here’s mine:

“Father, please give strength to Your people, the Jews. Give them wisdom, guidance and peace as they defend themselves from the swine that surrounds them. And if it be in Your will that a war ensues, help them blow the Muslims all to hell. In Jesus’ name I pray…amen.”
October 11, 2009 - Sunday 5:25 AM
As I type I'm at a friends' house doing emergency babysitting duty...she got sick and one of her kids is just getting over it.  I got my flu shot, though, so no worries.

A lot has gone on lately, and I can't divulge every little thing but here's what I can talk about.  First of all, getting over a friends' suicide never gets any easier.  This was the third time a friend killed himself but this time it was my best friend.  His father still blames me because I was the last person he spoke to. For a while I was getting a lot of emails and phone calls, and right as I was getting ready to change my number it all stopped.  It may still happen, though, so if you're on my contact list do not be surprised to get a text one day to let you know that I did.

I took a break from my work with the fire department to recover and got back to it in the first weekend of September.  Then, on the 11th, as I was headed to a doctor's appointment, I started having trouble breathing and nearly the worst chest pain I have ever experienced (perfect timing, right?).  The doc sent me to the ER and while at first they thought I might have pneumothorax (a collapsed lung), it turned out to be pleurisy.  They also discovered that I have hypothyroidism and am becoming anemic.  That could explain how I'm building enough muscle to push a truck but not losing the weight I've been trying to fight off.

Just before that incident, however, I went on a date.  I started talking to a girl who seemed to be very well put together, had her head on her shoulders, and seemed to be VERY into me.  We went out and had a fantastic time.  Then, I heard nothing from her.  I sent her a couple of text messages to no avail.  About a month later I ran her email through Facebook and found her under a different name--and listed as being in a relationship with a specific person who had left convincing messages all over her page.

There's been a lot of crap that's gone on this year.  As I said, there's a lot I can't talk about.  I will say that time and a lot of thinking have brought me to the conclusion that I have trusted people who never deserved my trust.  As I mentioned in another blog, I let a person back into my life after we hadn't spoken for three years.  When we parted ways she didn't know the truth about what had gone on.  She apparently didn't understand, however, that people change; words and deeds cannot be taken back, and once you've hurt a person you can't go back to the way things were.  I tried to start over but she wanted to pick up our lives from before the big meltdown and when it didn't happen that way, she dropped me like a hot rock again.  What floors me still is that she openly said that she understood that I had been hurt by everyone around me but she wasn't willing to be a part of the solution.  In so doing she, too, proved that she had never been a real friend.

I had one coworker tell me I should ask another one out because, quote, "you never know, Mel, it could turn out to be the best thing that ever happened to you!"  It turned out to be a disaster.  I didn't even get to the point where there was any asking out, because I figured out the truth the hard way.  Seems this guy just wanted some drama.  Then when I let him know I didn't appreciate him lying to me, he turned it back around on me and said, "people will talk, honey, you need to get used to that."

I've had enough of all the shit going on in my life.  I don't understand why people can't be the loyal friends they claim to be, why they can't be straightforward, why people would lie if the truth would do them better.  I'm no angel.  I've made my mistakes.  But I've also tried damn hard to make up for the stupidity of my younger years.  I do my damndest to do right by everyone around me and somehow I still get hurt in the end.  Either I have poor taste in friends or I really am still trying too damn hard to matter to people who will never really care. 

In the meantime...I'm getting ready to get back to school.  I'm taking advanced pharmacology and EKG this semester.  If I don't get accepted to the 2011 paramedic program, I'm going to start working towards finishing my criminal justice MA.  My dad picked up the guitar again and once he's gotten comfortable with playing a few songs we'll start jamming together. 

I'm really beginning to wonder when I'm going to get to enjoy life, though.  I don't want to live to be too old.  I'd like to think there will be something to look forward to somewhere along the way.
October 10, 2009 - Saturday 2:21 AM
We hear that phrase all the time from the gay community. According to many GLBT folks, it’s the rules and laws of religion and bigots raised in said religion that make us “less than human.” Reader Alex posted a comment on an older blog that was calm but reiterated that position, and I don’t think I’ve ever addressed what he wrote, though I’ve often thought about it.

To a degree, I may be able to understand Alex’s perspective, although even coming from the culture I was raised in–the Christian subculture, always at church or church functions–I disagree with much of it now. Bringing up Fred Phelps and his clan doesn’t really get you anywhere with most Christians these days, because by linking them you’re really just insulting all the other Christians. They don’t claim Phelps, his views, or his actions. So right off the bat you’ll lose respect by pointing that finger. Trust me when I tell you not to go there.

While it used to be true that most priests and pastors would preach about gays as though we were satan himself, it’s rarely the case anymore. Continuing to justify some of our actions by claiming that isn’t winning any hearts or minds, either. I refuse to go to gay pride parades or events that include drag queen strip shows or public displays of sex toys because I have never believed that to be okay for anyone to do–regardless of sexual orientation. That kind of thing only makes us look worse to them.

Christians are NOT to blame for hate crimes. You can’t blame them for those crimes any more than you can blame gun manufacturers for gun deaths. But what about those kids who grow up hearing “hate” preached from the pulpit all their young lives?

I don’t believe that, either. Here’s why.

When I was going through my coming-out crisis, once I got past the initial shock and all the hell that went with it, I still had a lot to go through. I spent six months (at the very least) poring over scripture, trying to figure out what I believed. I was working security part-time at the Phoenix Convention Center at the time, and the Southern Baptist Convention had their annual powwow there.

An organization called Soulforce, led by Rev. Mel White, decided to do a peaceful protest during the convention. Outside the PCC, members of Soulforce held a peaceful demonstration which, on the last night, culminated in the members of Soulforce and the other organizations present forming a line and holding a candlelight vigil while the thousands attending the conference left. It happened to be the night of the big youth rally.

In a move that stunned everyone there, the teenagers coming out of the PCC went down the line of Soulforce members and hugged each and every one of them. Some of them even had their parents staring in disapproval, but they did it anyway. They came in droves to do this. There was no judgment, no hatred. They extended their love and concern to a group of people they knew were misunderstood.

You cannot prejudge a person simply because they call themselves Christians. I am a Christian still, and I am gay. I believe God made me exactly the way I am and loves me without precondition. By holding on to anger, pointing fingers, and carrying signs that say “stop the Christian Taliban,” you’re not getting anywhere. You’re only exacerbating the problem. As long as the gay community tries to alienate religious groups in this fashion, we will continue to hit a brick wall.

We’re not less than human. 95% of Christians in America have not tried (at least not in recent memory) to make us so. Let’s try taking our own advice and be tolerant. Stop pointing fingers and start talking.
October 9, 2009 - Friday 2:34 AM
I’ve already posted today, but I just got a piece of news that I cannot ignore. As a member of the Fire/Rescue/EMS community, I have a passion for fire safety and prevention. I’ve studied fire science and love the subject. I’ve seen many fires destroy homes that could have been prevented, lives upended by people who don’t educate themselves about the dangers of fire.

The US Department of Homeland Security has a grant program with a cap of $35M called the Fire Prevention & Safety Grant. The maximum grant allowed is $1M per organization. It’s a part of the Assistance to Firefighters Grant program; the aim is to help fire departments acquire equipment, training for firefighters and education for the public. In Louisiana last month, some genius at DHS awarded nearly the full amount allowed to…wait for it…WAIT FOR IT…

ACORN.

WTF?!?

I literally fell out of my chair when I read this a few minutes ago. It wasn’t news at the time because it was kept on the down-low. So was last year’s awarded grants, nearly HALF of which went to ACORN. That organization does absolutely nothing–nothing!–to further fire safety or prevention education whatsoever, and their mission statement never goes into it. So what the hell is anyone doing awarding a first-responders grant to ACORN?

Janet Napolitano, who used to be my state’s governor (don’t ask me how), refused to comment to the media. She had her spokesman say that they will respond directly to Louisiana State Senator Vitter–because “we don’t respond to correspondence through the media.” Translation: we’re not going to do anything to make ourselves look any more stupid than we already have.

Newsflash, Napolitano–you’re just about too late.

A small-town fire department in Louisiana applied for a paisley $120,000 in grant funds to buy smoke detectors for low-income families in the wake of a home fire that killed four kids. They lost that grant to ACORN. Many fire departments lost grant money to ACORN for no visible reason. A similar thing happened last year–we wasted more than $450,000 in the same grant fund on ACORN, and that was during the Bush years! Who the hell makes these decisions?

I wasn’t able to find out. There’s little to nothing on the webpage, except a suggestion to email the program’s directorate. There’s little to no information available on the decision process–who gets what. Bureaucracy in action.

It took exactly minutes from the time that the news broke on firerescue1.com for the Obama administration to suddenly sit up and notice the incredible flub. They’ve now said that ACORN will receive none of these funds.

My problem isn’t that their funding wasn’t cut soon enough. According to government sources, as soon as the sting videos were posted and Congress voted to cut their funding, DHS followed suit to revoke the grants they’d been awarded. What galls me is that a grant for first responders–money meant to help firefighters, paramedics and dispatchers make their communities safer through fire prevention and safety education–was ever awarded to ACORN at all. They’re not involved in educating the public about fire prevention. They don’t have any fire experts in their employ. So how did this happen?

It shouldn’t have. They never should have gotten a dime of that money, not last year, and sure as hell not this year. The idea that a group completely uninvolved in public safety won such a massive amount of money supposedly for that sole purpose has got me all fired up, and I’m not letting this one go.

I’ve shot an email to DHS and FEMA reps. I’ll let you know what I get in response.
October 9, 2009 - Friday 1:31 AM
Democrats are saying some amazing things right now…and they’re ensuring their pending demise with their words. Today, it’s come out that President Obama is talking about only sending enough extra troops to Afghanistan to effectively fight Al-Qaeda. Worse yet, he’s talking about making the Taliban “a partner in the political process.”

I’m sorry…since when did we recognize any difference between Al-Qaeda and the Taliban?

They may go by different names, but in ideals they are the same. They both believe that America is the great satan. They both believe that jihad needs to be carried out against America. The Taliban may be a government while Al Qaeda is a paramilitary organization, but I can’t tell where one begins and the other ends. And I cannot believe that we’re talking about actually trying to make a deal with the Taliban.

The Taliban gave Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda shelter, resources, and the ability to train for jihad. They helped 9/11 happen. While I may agree that we needed to have a better plan before taking action against Iraq, we should have taken out the Taliban before they got a foothold back in the 80’s. There was no excuse for allowing them to take power. We have pictures and video of human rights violations that make my blood run cold, and our President wants to make a deal?

I don’t suppose this has anything to do with his Muslim upbringing. Or his desire to find some way to apologize to the world.

I hear liberals all day telling me how even the war in Afghanistan is wrong and needs to end. It’s their culture, they say. It’s not up to us to tell other people how to live.

This is where Philip goes, “Oh, REALLY?”

If it’s not our job to tell anyone how to live, then what’s the point of hate crimes legislation (which, by the way, you’ll get your wish for today when Congress votes to add sexual orientation to the list)? If we don’t have any right to tell anybody else what’s right and wrong, then why do we as a society have any laws to begin with? If it’s not up to us to determine what constitutes a punishable human rights violation, then what the hell gives you the right to call waterboarding torture? And please, explain to me WHY you’re demanding a global response to the genocide in Darfur. Explain this to me. Tell me why Israel is so wrong for doing what they do and defending themselves, why you’re so ready to support Palestinian suicide bombers.

If it is not our business what another nation does because that’s their culture, then why do you point fingers at us here at gayconservative and say that we must be a group of self-loathing closet cases and liken us to Jews trying to be Nazis?

You can’t have it both ways. Either there’s a clear right and wrong and we’re willing to stand up for it or everything is gray and there should be no societal law.

Oh, and I have to point this one out, too–GOP members issued a statement about the kerfuffle over the proposed troop surge in Afghanistan, saying, “If Nancy Pelosi’s failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place.”

Pelosi, on cue, made it a women’s rights issue and was completely aghast that Republicans would dare make such a statement. She just couldn’t believe that they’d say that to the first woman speaker of the house, and she hasn’t heard that language in decades.

Get a clue, Pelosi. We don’t give a damn what’s in your jockeys. What we care about is the fact that you have zero military experience and no concern whatsoever for what’s best for our nation and the future. That comment had nothing at all to do with your gender, so please, quit trying to make this a civil rights game. You’re proving that you’re incapable of using your brain to respond intelligently. You’re only playing politics, the same partisan game you accuse Republicans of.

One more thing…if any Republican had done what Charlie Rangel has, you’d be calling for his head. You’ve done it for far lesser offenses. Once we take the reins, you can bet your gender- and race-baiting ass he’ll answer for what he’s done.
October 6, 2009 - Tuesday 3:00 AM
I’ve been thinking of how to blog about this for the past week. NBC’s new primetime drama, “Trauma,” debuted last week. In the hopes that I would finally see an accurate portrayal of my profession on a major network, I watched it. I was not merely disappointed.

I was absolutely outraged.

The opening scenes were some of the worst I’ve ever seen. The female lead, a gorgeous blonde woman, isn’t wearing anything remotely resembling a uniform. She was wearing hot pants, a shirt tailored more for a stripper than a paramedic, and had the shirt unbuttoned far enough to show more cleavage than Pamela Anderson in her Baywatch days. Of course, every male character in the scene–which is every other character on the screen–is staring at her with their mouths hanging open. The very next scene shows this female lead having sex with her medic partner…in the back of their ambulance.

Lemme tell you folks something: anybody found wearing what this character was wearing while on duty would be fired on the spot. And sex in the back of a rescue? Please! I would not even want to eat my grub in the back of my rig! Completely aside from that, though, it’s unethical, leaves body substances in an area that is supposed to be kept sparkling clean for the safety of patients, and it’s so easy to be discovered with windows all over the stupid thing. Nothing says “please revoke my certification” like having sex in the back of your ambulance.

The medics get called to a rooftop rescue next, where the helicopter shows up and the pilot makes jokes to them over his intercom. Again, that doesn’t happen, especially not in a big city during a major rescue effort on the roof of a highrise. Predictably, the chopper collides with another chopper (both of them were flying WAY too close to the building) and crash with the medic crews still on the rooftop.

The pilot who survived, apparently the only survivor, comes back a year later to the job, hot-dogging and displaying behavior that would instantly have grounded him again. Nobody behaving the way this guy was would have been cleared to return to work. Our blonde female lead is still wearing the hot pants and stripper shirt, and every time she bends over a patient her mammaries all but fall out.

Then comes the finale: the big crash. A driver trying to text and speed causes a massive wreck that ends up involving a tanker truck carrying gasoline. Who’s the first there? The medics. What do they do? Not what they’re supposed to do according to the guidelines of the National Registry of EMT’s.

Every EMT is taught the two most important things in our profession on the first day of school–BSI and scene safety. BSI is body substance isolation (gloves, mask, goggles, that sort of thing). Scene safety is paramount to us. If we get hurt, we can’t help anybody else. We just become more victims that need to be rescued and the incident becomes an even bigger mess.

Not one of those medics would have been allowed on the scene until the firefighters on the hazmat crew had taken care of the ruptured tanker spilling gasoline everywhere. And that pilot? He wouldn’t have landed anywhere near that scene. He sure as hell wouldn’t have been marching around burning vehicles without a care in the world.
Also, once a victim has been pronounced deceased, the medics don’t transport the body to a hospital. It stays right where it is until the medical examiner comes to investigate–and the ME takes the body for possible autopsy.

Some people say, “it’s just TV.” Do we ever expect TV or the movies to be realistic? Not completely. This show, however, is an insult to every Fire and EMS professional who worked hard at their education to become public safety officials. I and those I know realize that it’s unrealistic, but a large portion of the public at large doesn’t. Just because a teenage boy would be more likely to watch a show with a hot blonde dressed like a floozy doesn’t mean you should create that role for a show about paramedics. It’s an embarrassment.

Truth, decency, and professional ethics are the main casualties of “Trauma.”
October 4, 2009 - Sunday 1:33 AM
I found myself saying something just a couple of hours ago that I didn't expect to hear from my own mouth:

I'm afraid I'm going to be alone for the rest of my life because I have never in my life fit in anywhere and I don't believe at this point that I ever will.  And I don't see the point in trying to take care of myself if that's never going to change.

Everybody talks about being different.  When I was in high school, "being different" was all the rage.  It was cool.  It was the only way to be.  You had to find some way to be different, otherwise you didn't fit in.  I always thought that was a bit hypocritical; talking about being different, being a rebel, in order to gain acceptance defeated the purpose.  To me it was putting on an act just like every other group so you could fit in.

I was the kid who never fit in anywhere.  Not at school, not at church, not even at home.  I grew up and tried to pretend that I didn't give a damn--I got tattoos and piercings, played in several rock bands, and tried to convince everybody that their opinion didn't matter.  Truth was, it always did.  Today someone brought up a very good point linking that past with my present.

I always wanted to fit in, but when I was a kid the people I tried to fit in with were the popular ones.  I always wanted to be in the in-crowd.  That hasn't changed today.  I don't fit in with that crowd any more now than I did then, no matter how hard I've tried.  I have questioned my sanity for continuing to try to matter to people who don't give a damn, and as much as I remind myself that it's my mind and my life, I keep wishing it would change. 

I used to believe that God always had a reason for bringing certain people into your life.  I'm not sure I believe that anymore.  One person who hurt me deeply several years ago came back into my life last year, and I thought there was a reason for it.  She only ended up hurting me all over again.  I can't see any reason at all for our paths crossing.  There are actually very few people I've had "friendships" with that I really believe were in my life for any real reason now. 

I don't belong at either of my jobs, really.  I don't belong at home.  I don't belong in conservative circles because I'm gay, and I don't belong in the gay community because I refuse to toe the party line.  I really am different, and I'm not sure I like it.  I often wonder if it's everyone else or if it's just me.  But at the same time, while I wish more than anything that I belonged somewhere, there's a piece of me now that has been hurt so many times that I'm afraid of actually making that connection with another person.

Maybe I'll always be that walking contradiction in terms.  Maybe it's worth fighting.  Maybe it's not.  Being truly different isn't all it was cracked up to be to that rebellious group in high school.  At least they were happy in their fantasy.
September 30, 2009 - Wednesday 2:16 AM
The complete ignorance of many people–particularly liberals–when it comes to the subject of guns in the hands of civilians never ceases to amaze me. Tomorrow, a law recently passed here in Arizona allowing CCW holders (concealed carry weapons permit) to carry their concealed firearms into restaurants and bars will go into effect.

But as I watched the news last night, I saw a not-so-shocking trend: reporters talking to a small but very vocal group of restauranteurs who are angry with the new law. Out of five local channels I watched, only ONE talked to a manager who didn’t have a problem with the law–ONLY ONE–and each and every one of those channels downplayed an important part of the law.

The law previously banned any and all firearms inside any establishment that served alcohol for on-premesis consumption (meaning all restaurants with liquor licenses and all bars). That part of Arizona gun law was changed, however, earlier this year. Ken Cheauvront, a Democrat lawmaker and restaurant owner, ardently opposed the bill to no avail. The argument is that alcohol and guns don’t mix. “People who are drinking shouldn’t be carrying guns,” they said. “We’re gonna see a huge spike in gun violence and deaths because of this!”

Here’s the kicker: the owners can put up signs that require guns be left in the car.

AND, if you’re carrying into a bar, you can’t drink. That nullifies the alcohol-and-guns argument, doesn’t it?

Well, the opponents come back with, “even if I put up this sign, how do I know those CCW holders are going to leave their guns in their cars when they come in here?”
Oh, my. Tell me this, folks–how were you able to tell if someone was carrying a gun to begin with? The bad guys never obeyed the laws in the first place, and they’ll carry their gun anywhere they want. There’s a law banning handguns in New York City, yet I seem to remember a well-recognized NFL player recently getting some serious jail time not just for having one, but carrying it stuffed in his pants into a club, where he shot himself with it.

The CCW holders aren’t the ones to worry about. They’re the ones who will obey the law. They’ll leave their guns in the car if they see the sign, and if they’re carrying they won’t drink. What the hell are you whining about?

I also have to bring up this interesting little factoid. Chicago also has a law banning all handguns within the city’s limits. But did you know that school violence involving gangs and handguns killed 18 students in schools all over Chicago during the 2007-2008 school year? 27 total died in acts of violence carried out with various weapons. And last school year–the one that ended this past May–a whopping 37 were killed, including one who was carrying a gun that was illegal by two rival gang members who were adults.

They’re not supposed to have them, but they get them anyway. And it’s the law-abiding citizens who suffer.

I suppose if we just had a few more laws, though, the thugs wouldn’t be able to get their hands on all those drugs, either.
September 24, 2009 - Thursday 11:50 PM
ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis shocked the entire country by appearing on FOX News this past Sunday. Today, however, she’s made a liar by her own organization. I have no trouble believing Lewis ordered this herself:

ACORN has filed suit against James O’Keefe and Hannah Giles, the two independent reporters who ran the actual sting operation, and against Andrew Breitbart, owner of Breitbart.com and Biggovernment.com, which aired the controversial ACORN videos.

Recap: earlier this month, a shocking video was posted on Biggovernment.com in which O’Keefe and Giles, posing as pimp and prostitute, went to the ACORN offices in Baltimore, Maryland to see what would happen if they asked for help and advice for their “situation.” They told the ACORN workers–Tonja Thompson and Shera Williams–that they made most or all of their money through Giles’ work as a prostitute, and they needed to hide their illicit activities from the IRS. Moreover, they wanted to buy a house to use as a brothel and wanted to staff it with underage girls from South America.

Thompson and Williams didn’t bat an eye. Both pretended like it was business as usual and gave the pair a laundry list of tips on how to evade detection by lying to the IRS and other authorities, including how to avoid paying taxes on ill-gotten gain and how to represent themselves on tax returns (they were really supposed to call themselves “performance artists”).

It didn’t stop there. There are reportedly no less than seven videos total, possibly eight. Each sting is at a different ACORN office, in every corner of the country. In each incident the same advice was given by different people. The reporters themselves later said that they didn’t expect to get anything of use out of the first meeting, and they certainly didn’t expect it to be so widespread. The operation revealed a systematic misuse of taxpayer and grant dollars for ACORN workers to help people use illegal means to get ahead.

After the first video was aired, most of the MSM ignored it–except FOX News. Within seconds of their first report on the sting, ACORN sent FOX producers a nasty-gram to stop showing the videos or reporting on the controversy (you could have set your watch by their timed reaction). When video after video revealed the same issues at every major ACORN hub in America, though, Congress took notice. They voted to de-fund ACORN. And Lewis had to stand up and say something, so she said it to FOX, whom they’d already threatened with a lawsuit.

Just days after her pontification about the actions of those employees being “unconscionable” and “inexcusable,” however, Lewis must have had a change of heart.

What’s interesting about the lawsuit is that it’s only for ACORN’s damaged reputation and the two Maryland employees–not all the others. And the entire basis of the suit is the Maryland Wiretap Law, which is quoted in the complaint. But if you read the quotations, it refers to “interception” of communications; nowhere does it refer to recording one’s own conversations. There’s a difference. O’Keefe and Giles weren’t setting up cameras and microphones to tape conversations they weren’t involved in, they were taping themselves.

So in reality, they didn’t violate the MWL. And it’s incredibly disingenuous for ACORN’s fearless leader to feign acceptance of responsibility for the poor actions of their employees, then turn around and sue the people who brought the grievances to light.

She’s basically saying, “yes, we were wrong, but we’re gonna make you pay for calling us out on it.” It’s a bully tactic, pure and simple. If Lewis were really sorry for what had been done, if ACORN weren’t really a criminal racket, and if it truly were just an isolated problem (at seven or eight offices all across the country, no less), there would be no lawsuit. It’s not just the two employees suing–it’s ACORN suing on their behalf. They’re demanding $1 million for ACORN’s reputation and $500K each for the two employees. And legal fees to boot.

Ah, the age of accountability. We’re so much more honest now than we were a year ago, aren’t we?
September 24, 2009 - Thursday 4:35 AM
Today, Democrats killed the transparency Obama promised yet again. While voting on whether to post the new healthcare legislation 72 hours prior to voting on the final bill, the Senate Finance Committee struck the measure down. They promised only to post “conceptual language” online about the bill. God forbid they actually let us all have unfettered access to it. We might actually decide for ourselves–the way we did on the last one–that we don’t want it.

Moammar Qadhafi addressed the UN right on the heels of dear leader Barack Obama. Obama told the entire world how he is the change everybody has waited for (all hail Obamessiah!). Then Qadhafi went on some long rant about how he would be happy if “our son” Obama could be the President forever, Israelis killed JFK and MLK, and Libya is going to “bring the rolling thunder” to America. America will be attacked again, so the UN needs to move out.

Meanwhile, back on the farm…

Here in Arizona, on November 15 of last year, 16-year-old Kelly Tracy was headed with her brother Matthew to prepare with their high school’s marching band to perform in a parade when their car was struck by a drunken illegal alien, Manuel Contreras-Galdean. Matthew was injured. Kelly died within hours. Contreras-Galdean was placed under arrest at the scene. Shortly after the collision he caused (while driving with a BAC of .192), he was found to be in the United States illegally. He has since also been charged with forgery–he used what police call “synthetic fraud” to create a fake identity and falsified employment records to get a job.

He wasn’t even supposed to be in our country.

I do not speak for the Tracy family. I do not know what their thoughts and feelings are about the aggravating factors of Contreras-Galdean’s “immigrant” status. But I can’t imagine how they must feel today as the man who murdered their daughter had the tacit nerve to stand up in court and reject the prosecution’s plea offer of 10.5 years for each count against him (21 years total).

That sorry SOB had the gall to demand 14 to 16 years.

Oh, but he’s sooooo sorry. He didn’t mean to cause the family any pain. He wasn’t supposed to be here, he wasn’t supposed to drink and drive, and he wasn’t supposed to be at the intersection at Guadalupe and Sossaman as lit up as he was that morning. He was, though, and while he survived with minimal injuries, beautiful Kelly was torn from her life before she’d had a chance to do all the things she hoped to do.

Contreras-Galdean isn’t the first to beg for leniency in court because he didn’t mean to hurt anybody. People who have willingly killed with their bare hands have made such claims many times over. Since when does simply saying “I’m sorry, I didn’t mean to” absolve anyone of the consequences of taking a life?

One of my top ten favorite lyrics ever is from a song by Jars of Clay, called Crazy Times: “it takes more than your saline eyes to make things right.”
September 20, 2009 - Sunday 9:00 PM
It's Rosh Hashanah, everybody!  I'm with my family today, enjoying the day and their company.  I'm also--as usual--watching the news.  FOX News in particular.  (Liberals, roll your eyes now and start the familiar "FOX isn't news" mantra...face it, they're getting John Stossel, they've already gotten Bernie Goldberg and Chris Wallace, you can't just say they're making up their own news or get pissed about their "right-wing agenda".)

I just finished watching Chris Wallace's Fox News Sunday section featuring ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis and Republican congressman Darrell Issa (don't tell me they're biased--you'd never see Issa or any other known conservative sitting next to such a die-hard liberal on any of the other major networks!).  Wallace was fair; he actually gave much of the floor to Lewis.  I found it very interesting, both amusing and at the same time irritating, that Lewis was completely incapable of addressing Issa.  Not once did she so much as look at him.  She didn't turn to face him.  She couldn't even speak to the man--any time Issa posed a civil and rational question to Lewis, using "you" and "your" and other direct, personal words and phrases, Lewis would ONLY speak to Wallace.  "What Mr. Issa says is interesting," she'd say, or, "I'm glad Mr. Issa asked that question."  She wouldn't even acknowledge he was in the same building, let alone sitting not two feet from her.

I daresay that behavior was absolutely outrageous.  Can you imagine if Darrell Issa had done that?  He'd have been tarred and feathered.  It's every bit as outrageous as Obama making a point to blitz all of the Sunday morning news shows...with the only exception being FOX.  He wouldn't give one second of airtime to FOX, yet he'd talk to every other big-name network.

This week, Andrew Breitbart's www.biggovernment.com began running a series of explosive videos in which two independent journalists posing as pimp and prostitute ran a sting and caught at every single office ACORN employees giving them advice on evading detection for their illicit activities by finding ways to hoodwink the IRS and others who might come sniffing.  In some cases, the ACORN workers gave tips on how to hide the fact that they were using underage girls from South America in a prostitution ring.  When the videos first came out ACORN threatened to sue and put pressure on the Maryland AG's office.  That AG first tried to threaten Breitbart and his reporters with an investigation into supposed illegal wiretapping for recording the sessions.  Today, after threatening FOX with a lawsuit for showing the videos, Lewis appeared with Wallace in a concerted damage control effort.  Obama, though, is trying to claim he didn't know what was going on and that he doesn't care.

I think Obama would rather have dental surgery without anesthesia than talk to a FOX reporter.  He'd rather talk to the reporters who fawned over him when he walked by because they won't challenge him--they'll ask him what appears to be a tough question, much like George Stephanopoulos did this morning on ABC, then once he's given his answer they let it go.  They won't ask him to elaborate, they just move on.  What happened to really asking the tough questions?  I seriously think everyone in the MSM has lost their balls.  I think they dropped off and rolled down their pant legs, and they didn't stop to think before kicking them away as little more than an annoyance.

Stephanopoulos asked Obama about ACORN, to which Obama stuttered and finally said that he wasn't paying attention to the ACORN controversy and the news about Congress cutting off funding to the community-organizing group.  It stopped there, though.  It went no further.  Stephanopoulos allowed Obama to deny being involved and didn't point out a single shred of evidence (of which there is quite a bit) that Obama is, in fact, heavily involved with ACORN.  He always has been.  Where were the challenges about Obama's previous legal work on ACORN's behalf?  Where were the challenges about Obama training ACORN workers for Project Vote?  Where were the questions about Obama giving more than $830,000 to Citizens Services, Inc., an ACORN front organization, for "advance work" on his campaign--work such as sound, lighting, lodging, polling and license fees.  Mind you, ACORN and CSI are both supposedly just community organizing groups that canvas for low-income families.  And the Obama campaign had to later revise their federal reports on the payments to CSI.  They lied about it on the report they initially filed.

Nobody in the MSM has dared to cross The One and ask questions about funding, ties to ACORN, or questionable practices.  Hardball my Texan ass--the MSM doesn't know how to do it anymore.  They couldn't even play real hardball with Sarah Palin!  What the hell kind of question is "what magazines do you read to get your news?"  Are you freakin' serious?

We need to face facts.  Bertha Lewis and ACORN are a criminal racket and Obama is up to his eyeballs with them.  He says he's not paying much attention, but the reality is that he's just trying to distance himself from his most ardent supporters in an attempt to save face.  Plausible deniability is the new chic with Democrats.  First Charles Gibson pretended to know nothing about the ACORN scandal, then Nancy Pelosi followed suit.  Today, Obama played dumb.  Obama and ACORN are frick and frack, folks.  You can't separate 'em.
September 19, 2009 - Saturday 3:10 AM
“I think everybody should like everybody.” –Andy Warhol

During his “Bed-in for peace,” John Lennon gave several interviews; in one of them, a journalist asked what message he and Yoko Ono were trying to convey. “All we’re saying is give peace a chance,” he replied. Lennon liked the phrase so much that he made a song out of it. It rapidly became the theme song for anti-war demonstrations all over America.

Today it’s still sung by anti-war protesters. I’ve seen video clips of many different groups singing the same old “all that we’re saying…is give peace a chance” chorus line many times over the past few years. It’s sung by people carrying all manner of signs, most of which–sarcastically or otherwise–basically say that there’s never any reason for war. War is never the answer. And if you support the war, you’re a murderer.

I take serious offense to that song. Why?

It suggests that war is something I like. That I’m violent by nature. That I didn’t try first to solve an issue by talking before putting my dukes up. It suggests that I enjoyed writing to my brother in Iraq and Afghanistan and that I want him to go back. Those words are sung by people who have already decided that because I support both the troops AND their mission, I’d rather go to war and give up on peace.

What makes so many people believe that war is never the answer? It has actually been the answer to a great many things. The American Revolution created our country and threw off the chains of England. The Barbary Wars stopped Muslims from raiding American towns on the coast and taking whatever (and whomever) they pleased; it also stopped the Pashah of Tripoli from demanding hush money. The Civil War ended slavery and kept our nation together. World War I helped our European allies stave off takeover by the Germans; World War II stopped the Nazi takeover from getting any worse.

Sure, we’ve fought wars that were either unnecessary or poorly-planned. But that doesn’t mean that war is never the answer. Yes, people die. War is hell. Nothing in life is ever perfect. If we’re unwilling to fight for the right thing, though, the end result can and will be far worse.

“Give Peace a Chance” is written from the point of view that Andy Warhol said the words I quoted at the open of this post. Humans are inherently good, so there should be no reason to fight. Everybody should like everybody. We’re all people, right? Why can’t we all just get along?

Have you ever noticed that you don’t have to teach a child to do something bad? You have to raise a kid and teach them how to do what’s right, because they’ll naturally do what they’re not supposed to do. Human nature is, in fact, NOT inherently good. Look at the Nazis. Tribal warfare has brought starvation, disease, and mass murder to many African nations–Mogadishu and Darfur are perfect examples. Palestinians raise their sons to believe that martyrdom is the highest form of honor and train them to achieve it by blowing themselves up in crowded Israeli civilian areas to kill as many Jews as they can. And slavery was ended, but it gave way to segregation in America–and it lasted how long?

How can we look at the reality of human nature and sing songs about how human beings are really good and we all just need to hug and hold hands? What makes us believe that refusing to fight is going to do us any good?

I’m perfectly capable of giving peace a chance. Most people would say they are. But as long as we have issues with admitting when we’re wrong, talking about things that are uncomfortable, and accepting that we’re not perfect, peace will never be perfect.

So when someone figures out how to cure those ills, we can talk about how we can all just get along.
September 14, 2009 - Monday 10:02 PM
I just love it when one of my liberal acquantances tells me that I need to be more tolerant.  I love it when I'm asked if I've ever questioned what I believe.  I really love it when people tell me that I'm incapable of being reasonable because I'm politically conservative, and conservatives need to be more open-minded.

During Obama's speech last week, Republican Jim Wilson shouted, "you lie!" when Obama talked about certain aspects of his healthcare reform.  Democrats, in true fashion, immediately called for Wilson to be censured.  Where is all the huff and puff when one of their own acts like a real neanderthal?

Where were they when Rep. Pete Stark threatened to throw a journalist out the window for nothing more than asking a question?


Or when Stark accused Republicans of sending troops to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the Presidents' amusement?


Let's go back a little further, though, shall we?  Back in 1990, when Stark first started banging the drum for socialized healthcare, Dr. Louis Sullivan--a black man--opposed Stark's Democrat plans openly.  Stark couldn't offer a single intelligent rebuttal, but he could insult Sullivan by saying, "you are a disgrace to your race and your profession."  Sullivan came back with a sarcastic, “I guess I should feel ashamed because Congressman Stark thinks I am not a ‘good Negro...as a Cabinet member who has spent almost four decades of my life dedicated to healing...(I) am unable to express my own views without being subject to race-based criticism by those who are not ready to accept independent thinking by a black man.”

Good for Sullivan for standing up for his beliefs.  Stark the bully never changed, though.  In 1995, Stark called Republican rep. Nancy Johnson a "whore" for the insurance industry when she refused to support his healthcare schemes as well (he also said that her only knowledge of health care was gained from "pillow talk" with her husband, who is a physician).  Where were all the feminists when that happened?

In 1999, California state welfare director Eloise Anderson (a conservative) openly opposed life-long welfare entitlement.  Stark called her a "baby killer," saying, "she'd kill children if she had her way" because she refused to agree with Stark that some people are entitled to get welfare checks for their entire lives.

Then, in 2003, the House was about to begin hearings on pension fund legislation.  Republican rep. Scott McInnis began reading the bill and rep. Bill Thomas began trying to drown him out.  McInnis demanded that Thomas and Stark be quiet, and Stark began taunting him: “Oh, you think you are big enough to make me, you little wimp? Come on. Come over here and make me. I dare you.”  Such a display is bound to shock anybody; Stark couldn't just stop there, though.  He continued, “You little fruitcake. You little fruitcake. I said you are a fruitcake.”

Think that was it?  Think again!  Stark went way over the top when he called McInnis a "c--ksucker."

Then there was the incident with one of his constituents, Daniel Dow.  Stark toed the line with 49 fellow Democrats on refusing to support a resolution that condemned the abuse at Abu Ghraib, but offered unbending support for the troops in Iraq.  Dow, an enlisted soldier who had just returned home from Kosovo, wrote Stark a strongly-worded letter and faxed it in.  To his utter shock and surprise, Dow came home from running errands to find a voicemail from his representative--but it wasn't nice in the least.  Stark told Dow he didn't know what he was talking about, then told him that if he'd cared about enlisted people, he wouldn't have supported the resolution, either.  He went on to tell Dow that someone had likely put him up to it, because there was no way he was smart enough to actually write his own letter, then promised to call back to tell him how "great a god damned hero" Dow was.

Wow.  Where were all the outraged Democrats when Stark was behaving like a neanderthal?  Oh, wait, I forgot...he's allowed to speak and act like a rap star because he's a Democrat and a liberal, and as we all know they're the only ones who know
how to be tolerant.

Now remember, everybody...you have to be tolerant and open-minded!
September 11, 2009 - Friday 1:35 PM
zzzJeff LeVeen was my kinda guy.

He was a huge fan of the Dave Matthews Band. He’d seen them no fewer than a dozen times (ahem…that’s a dozen times a year), and his favorite song was “Proudest Monkey.” One of his friends described a moment at one such show where he was jumping up and down, screaming for the band to play his favorite song.

He served his country in the Army during the Vietnam War before graduating from Dartmouth University, where he was captain of the golf team. He could spend a whole day playing golf and go home and ask his kids, “who wants to go fishing?” He was a man with seemingly limitless energy, whose family was his whole world.

On September 11, 2001, he was in his office at Cantor Fitzgerald on the 104th floor of the North Tower of the World Trade Center in a meeting. At 0846 Eastern Standard Time, American Airlines Flight 11 struck the North Tower between the 93rd and 99th floors–just below the Cantor Fitzgerald offices. The impact of the jetliner into the building and the subsequent fireball that erupted rendered all stairwells and elevators above the 92nd floor impassable; there was no escape for the 1,344 souls trapped above.

Cantor Fitzgerald lost 658 members of its family–including Jeff LeVeen.

Later, as his wife Christine described trying to find pictures of Jeff by himself–a feat she found nearly impossible. “All our photos showed him with his arm around the kids or they had their arms around him. He was never alone. That’s the kind of man he was.”

The world is a much better place for having had Jeff in it. I look forward to meeting you when I get home.

(NOTE: this is my contribution to Project 2,996, the movement to post a tribute to each soul lost in the attacks on September 11, 2001.)