MySpace

Thoughts from The Expelled Response anyone?

Expelled: The Movement



Last Updated: 10/19/2008

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 101
Sign: Aquarius

City: ALL OVER
State: California
Country: US
Signup Date: 7/19/2007

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Tuesday, April 08, 2008 
Something amazing happened just over a week ago. The controversy around Premise Media’s upcoming movie Ben Stein’s EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed became the hottest topic in the blogosphere. According to BlogPulse, a service of Nielsen Buzzmetrics, the issue held the number one slot throughout the day on Monday, March 24th (Blog Pulse). There were also over 800 results on Technorati (Technorati).

"It is amazing to see the reaction of PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins and their cohorts when one of them is simply expelled from a movie. Yet
these men applaud when professors throughout the nation are fired from their jobs and permanently excluded from their profession for mentioning
Intelligent Design," said producer Mark Mathis. Mathis was at the event that has raised this controversy.

Mathis continued, "I hope PZ’s experience has helped him see the light. He is distraught because he could not see a movie. What if he wasn’t
allowed to teach on a college campus or was denied tenure? Maybe he will think twice before he starts demanding more professors be
blacklisted and expelled simply because they question the adequacy of Darwin’s theory."

EXPELLED was screened for a select Minneapolis grass roots audience on Thursday night. Dr. Myers and noted atheist Dr. Richard Dawkins were
not sent invitations to the screening from the producers. Nevertheless, they acquired access to a proprietary online RSVP site, along with a
group of other atheists. The producers were notified that Myers and others who were not invited had signed up for the screening. They were
also aware that Dawkins, who oddly used his formal surname "Clinton" instead of Richard to sign up, was in attendance.

Recognizing the opportunity to make a point of the inconvenience and pain that they, and others like them, have caused to numerous scientists
and educators, the decision was made beforehand to deny Myers access to the film if he actually showed up. PZ is one of the foremost proponents
of expelling those who hold to any form of Intelligent Design: "The only appropriate responses [to proponents of Intelligent Design] should
involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many school board members, and
vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians."
(http://Pandasthumbs Comment 35130 Posted by PZ Myers, 6/14/05, 07:50)

Executive Producer Logan Craft noted: "EXPELLED makes it clear that academic freedom is at stake. Yet Dawkins and his friends continue to
misrepresent the film and slander the producers. It is obvious that they do not want to debate the real issues raised in the movie. Their
only interest is to control the damage their interviews have done to their cause. We are happy to let the public decide where the truth
rests on this controversial issue when the movie opens nationwide on April 18th."

Myers has apparently been asking supporters to sneak into the different private screenings for many weeks. After being denied his chance to see
the movie, Myers blogged about his experience and expressed his outrage.

Executive Producer Walt Ruloff responded, "This is the typical reaction of Darwinists and atheists who are so blinded by their own self
importance that they fail to understand what is really going on. They yell and scream when one of their friends isn’t allowed to see a movie
weeks before it goes public. All this outrage while these same people organize witch hunts to expel those who disagree with them."

Premise Media’s new film, Ben Stein’s EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed, opens nationwide on April 18th.

Visit www.GetEXPELLED.com(Get Expelled) today and enter to win FREE tickets!
Tuesday, April 08, 2008 

Current mood:  excited
Category: Movies, TV, Celebrities
Watch this video!

..


Freedom Friday is April 18th! Join Ben and stand up for academic freedom by seeing EXPELLED in theaters nationwide on Freedom Friday!

And keep sending us your comments! We love and need your support!
Monday, April 07, 2008 
Something amazing happened just over a week ago. The controversy around Premise Media’s upcoming movie Ben Stein’s EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed became the hottest topic in the blogosphere. According to BlogPulse, a service of Nielsen Buzzmetrics, the issue held the number one slot throughout the day on Monday, March 24th (http://www.blogpulse.com). There were also over 800 results on Technorati (www.technorati.com).

"It is amazing to see the reaction of PZ Myers, Richard Dawkins and their cohorts when one of them is simply expelled from a movie. Yet
these men applaud when professors throughout the nation are fired from their jobs and permanently excluded from their profession for mentioning
Intelligent Design," said producer Mark Mathis. Mathis was at the event that has raised this controversy.

Mathis continued, "I hope PZ’s experience has helped him see the light. He is distraught because he could not see a movie. What if he wasn’t
allowed to teach on a college campus or was denied tenure? Maybe he will think twice before he starts demanding more professors be
blacklisted and expelled simply because they question the adequacy of Darwin’s theory."

EXPELLED was screened for a select Minneapolis grass roots audience on Thursday night. Dr. Myers and noted atheist Dr. Richard Dawkins were
not sent invitations to the screening from the producers. Nevertheless, they acquired access to a proprietary online RSVP site, along with a
group of other atheists. The producers were notified that Myers and others who were not invited had signed up for the screening. They were
also aware that Dawkins, who oddly used his formal surname "Clinton" instead of Richard to sign up, was in attendance.

Recognizing the opportunity to make a point of the inconvenience and pain that they, and others like them, have caused to numerous scientists
and educators, the decision was made beforehand to deny Myers access to the film if he actually showed up. PZ is one of the foremost proponents
of expelling those who hold to any form of Intelligent Design: "The only appropriate responses [to proponents of Intelligent Design] should
involve some form of righteous fury, much butt-kicking, and the public firing and humiliation of some teachers, many school board members, and
vast numbers of sleazy far-right politicians."
(http://www.pandasthumb.org/pt-archives/001143.htmlcomments Comment 35130 Posted by PZ Myers, 6/14/05, 07:50)

Executive Producer Logan Craft noted: "EXPELLED makes it clear that academic freedom is at stake. Yet Dawkins and his friends continue to
misrepresent the film and slander the producers. It is obvious that they do not want to debate the real issues raised in the movie. Their
only interest is to control the damage their interviews have done to their cause. We are happy to let the public decide where the truth
rests on this controversial issue when the movie opens nationwide on April 18th."

Myers has apparently been asking supporters to sneak into the different private screenings for many weeks. After being denied his chance to see
the movie, Myers blogged about his experience and expressed his outrage.

Executive Producer Walt Ruloff responded, "This is the typical reaction of Darwinists and atheists who are so blinded by their own self
importance that they fail to understand what is really going on. They yell and scream when one of their friends isn’t allowed to see a movie
weeks before it goes public. All this outrage while these same people organize witch hunts to expel those who disagree with them."

Premise Media’s new film, Ben Stein’s EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed, opens nationwide on April 18th.

Visit www.GetEXPELLED.com today and enter to win FREE tickets!
Friday, April 04, 2008 
An email from a college student was posted on a Blogpulse.com that outlined
his personal account of Richard Dawkins allegedly ³crashing the party² of an
Expelled screening. This occurrence received so much buzz in the
blogosphere.

The original PZ Myers post was 1 on Blogpulse.com last week! As the
controversy continues, it seems some have taken extreme measures to downplay
Ben Stein¹s film, EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed.

Go to this link to read more:
a>

And remember, EXPELLED hits theaters nationwide on April 18th! Be sure to
see it opening weekend.
Thursday, March 27, 2008 
Opens nationwide APRIL 18.

EXPELLED Movie Theater Listings

The listing is updated daily! If it’s not playing in your area, let us know and we’ll help you get it there!
Tuesday, March 25, 2008 

Think the media isn’t biased?  Think again.  Check out why we’ve been EXPELLED from many media programs and publications. . .

 

 

Remark: "Evolution does not mean Godlessness, you morons."

-Willie Kiernan, Cazenovia Republican, Editor in Chief

 

Remark: "Evolution is science, not an "ism"

-Chris Porter, Charlotte Sun Herald, Managing Editor

 

Remark: "Perhaps you want to look up how science uses the term "theory" and how religion uses the term "faith". Is the theory of gravity something that is still being investigated? Perhaps you also want to investigate the definition of "science" and the definition of "religion". Keep Creationism and Intelligent Design where it belongs - in religious education."

-Karen Rubin, Family Travel Letter, Editor in Chief

 

 

Remark: "Great! A Comedian is part of this talk against modern science.  Let’s see, in the name of academic freedom we can teach that two plus two equals nine, that Shakespeare was really King James, the earth is flat, the stars are not really there, we live under a big blue bowl with white dots painted on it. There are some things that are simply, and verifiably true...such as evolution."

-Frank Wagner, KTTX-FM, News Director

 

Mr. Wagner sent us ANOTHER remark: "So, What’s next: Florida’s math teachers are now forced to teach that two plus two equals four.  Florida’s history teachers now forced to teach Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence.  The scientific theory of evolution is one of the most firmly established scientific theories.  By the way, the word in scientific parlance, doesn’t mean it’s something less than fact, it means it is an explanation of what is already known.  Yes, it does appear that the Florida Board of Education has indeed heard of the scientific method and that’s why they are mandating that the theory of evolution be taught"

Wednesday, March 19, 2008 
Review of the Film Expelled by Jeremy Thiessen
Drummer in the band Downhere
For more info on Jeremy visit: www.downhere.com or his personal blog: www.jeremythiessen.com

Freedom… a quality of life that we value and defend at incredible cost here in America. Students are taught in the classroom about the freedom fighters of yesterday – heroes like Martin Luther King Jr., Winston Churchill, the students of Tiananmen Square. We celebrate those who have fought in wars both at home and abroad in the defense of freedom. Freedom of speech is available to Americans in all aspects of life… isn’t it?

Not in the world of science. In his new documentary "Expelled" Ben Stein exposes the oppression and persecution of scientists who dare to disagree with Darwinism and suggest even the possibility of Intelligent Design. Ironically, it seems that the freedom of inquiry has been removed from the hallowed hallways of our scientific institutions. In its place has been erected an imaginary wall "protecting" science from theocratic "intellectual terrorists" – those who consider Intelligent Design a viable alternative to Darwinian theory.

I’ve known about the whole Darwinism vs. Intelligent Design debate for years, but I didn’t realize how toxic the waters had become towards those supporting I.D. until I saw this movie. Hatred, scorn and disdain for those who consider Intelligent Design a reputable option to Darwinism oozed from the interviews Ben conducted with various leading Darwinists within the scientific community as well as those outside of it. I was taken aback by the utter close-mindedness of these people who make a living asking questions, considering options, and exploring every possibility.

Ben and the producers of "Expelled" have done a fantastic job of drawing a parallel between the erecting and eventual crumbling of the Berlin Wall and the attempt of the scientific community to turn a theory (Darwinism) into unquestionable fact. Through rarely-seen period footage and Stein’s drier-than-sand humor, "Expelled" draws attention to the injustices going on within the world of the scientific elite and gives us reason to start asking the questions they don’t want to answer. This could very well be the most important movie your students see all year. Make April 18th a movie night and join the movement: the freedom of inquiry is being eroded from American culture, and this is the first step in doing something about it.
Thursday, February 21, 2008 
Academic freedom has recently been questioned by one of America's most prominent figures, Ben Stein. From children learning the beginnings of biology to PhD's in all scientific realms, Darwinism seems commonplace. But some do not readily accept these ideas, as most Darwinists would hope. In fact, many scientists managed to put themselves in a hotbed of trouble by putting their jobs and futures in jeopardy for simply discussing Intelligent Design. The Constitution maintains that citizens hold freedom of speech, but belief and new ideas cost a pretty penny when subscribing to theories threatening Darwinism.

Recently, Stein began a quest to discover the censorship in our "free" country. To his dismay, he found that the scientific community is no place for differing ideals. Rather it is an exclusive group that dictates "truth" to the world of academia, which ultimately conditions our society. Something has gone wrong.

Amid the many theories on the existence of life, Intelligent Design has begun to gain strength among some highly prominent scientists. Intelligent Design, or ID, maintains that an unseen force developed humanity; ID essentially recognizes a creator of human existence.

This seemingly innocent idea has caused many scientists notable problems in their quest for asserting this theory.

"If they stray from a Darwinian position," explains Walt Ruloff, CEO of Premise Media, "these people have been called into their superiors office and have lost their jobs, or have been denied tenure, or have been so discredited by the powers that be, that their future and their hopes and dreams of being a scientist have been squashed."

The National Science Foundation and the National Institution of Health allocates billions of dollars per year to research companies that must shelf much of their evidence in order to fit the Darwinian Paradigm. Much of the evidence found conflicts with "truth" in science today.

Stein insists, "we're not by any means certain that Intelligent Design is the answer." He states, "we don't think we have all the answers.
We just want free speech."

Stein's new film EXPELLED: No Intelligence Allowed is creating uproar in it's plea for free speech. Students nationwide remain indoctrinated within the public educational system; they are taught nothing but Darwinism.

Within the majority of communities and especially the scientific community, our country values conversation and challenge as the driving force for new ideas. Charles Darwin himself commented in his work entitled, "Origin of Species," "A fair result can be obtained only by fully balancing the facts and arguments on both sides of each question." How is it that the most prominent scientists of our day have somehow ignored this?

Stein answers, "The people in Big Science, at least in the evolutionary end of it, owe their jobs to their prominence in Darwinian
thinking and Darwinian ideology and if the Darwinism ideology is overthrown or even questioned seriously, then they lose some of their power and their prestige, and nobody wants to lose power and prestige."

But as Ruloff comforts those in question of Darwinism, "you are not alone, and there are thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of people, and students and researchers that are in your shoes."

For those who see the explanation of life differently from Darwin, the world of academia is a cold place. Although theories are only theories, America maintains an outlook that supports a marketplace of ideas rather than a monopoly on "truth."

In 2005, President Bush commented, "Both sides ought to be properly taught . . . so people can understand what the debate is about. Part of education is to expose people to different schools of thought. . . . You're asking me whether or not people ought to be exposed to different ideas, and the answer is yes."

Although Bush agrees the Federal government should not decide the curriculum for education, he urges that this theory be considered in area of teaching. The court system, however, doesn't agree with President Bush. The Dover trial in Pennsylvania made it illegal to teach I.D in schools, stating that the theory was clearly a particular religious belief. Although ID proponents consider this a distortion of the ID position, we must ask why are we opposed our students learning about religious ideas in school?

Michael Behe, a PhD in Bio Chemistry, proponent of ID and Professor of LeHigh University in Pennsylvania received disapproval of his latest book "The Edge of Evolution." On the University's website, a disclaimer stated, "While we respect Prof. Behe's right to express his views, they are his alone and are in no way endorsed by the department. It is our collective position that intelligent design has no basis in science, has not been tested experimentally and should not be regarded as scientific." As Stein can attest, numerous examples like Behe remain. Opponents of ID tend to think of the theory as inherently religious, which supposedly deems ID unscientific.

Those who hold ID as potentially true must also hold belief in a designer which tends to make them religious. Atheists could not consider this idea for it would be in opposition to their core beliefs. With roughly 90% of scientists holding a worldview void of a God, we begin to understand the reasons for censorship. As long as atheists hold such power in the Scientific community, ID will maintain little weight.

Of course, many agree censorship of ID remains wrong, if not immoral, and this is precisely why Stein attempts to uncover this problem in our country. This is one citizen that understands we must maintain healthy debate over today's truths; after all, it is the foundation of our society.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008 
• Darwinian evolution is inherently a racist philosophy, teaching that different groups or races evolved at different times and rates, so some groups are more like their ape-like ancestors than others.
• Before Darwinian evolution was popularized, when most people talked about "races," they were referring to such groups as the "English race," "Irish race," etc.

• Robert N. Proctor (Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis [1988]) observed: "Prior to Darwin, it was difficult to argue against the Judeo-Christian conception of the unity of man, based on the single creation of Adam and Eve. Darwin 's theory suggested that humans had evolved over hundreds of thousands, even millions of years, and that the races of men had diverged while adapting to the particularities of local conditions. The impact of Darwin's theory was enormous."

• Darwin spoke of the "gorilla" and the "Negro" [sic] as occupying evolutionary positions between the "Baboon" and the "civilized races of man" ("Caucasian"); viz: At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate, and replace, the savage races throughout the world. At the same time, the anthropomorphous apes ... will no doubt be exterminated. The break between man and his nearest allies will then be wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilized state, as we may hope, even than the Caucasian, and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as now between the Negro [sic] or Australian and the gorilla.

• Despite his hatred of slavery, Darwin's writings reek with all kinds of contempt for "primitive" people.

• Thomas Huxley wrote: "No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average Negro (sic) is the equal, still less the superior, of the white man. And if this be true, it is simply incredible that, when all his disabilities are removed, and our prognathous relative has a fair field and no favor, as well as no oppressor, he will be able to compete successively with his bigger-brained and smaller-jawed rival, in a contest which is to be carried on by thoughts and not by bites." (Lay Sermons, Addresses, and Reviews, 1871)

• Many of the early evolutionists were outspoken racists, and racial inferiority views were assumed to be proven, and thus were less a subject of debate or concern than one today would assume.


• Sir Francis Galton, founder of the eugenics movement, believed very strongly that intelligence was mainly hereditary. He was also convinced there were profound differences in mental ability between the races. He regarded Negroes as barely human at all.

• Robert Chambers in his classic Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, concluded that Blacks were "at the foot of" the Mongol, the Yellow race between, and Caucasians at the top. Chambers himself taught that the "various races of mankind, are simply . . . stages in the development of the highest or Caucasian type. . ." and that the Blacks were the least developed, and the Caucasians were the highest, most evolved race.

• Although support for Darwin's theory was by no means universal, by the 1920s textbooks such as George William Hunter's 1914 Civic Biology that supported the idea that man had evolved from a lower life form, were prevalent in public schools. The message provided fuel to the growing eugenics movement in the United States. It concluded that as man descended from a lower life form, he evolved to varying degrees of accomplishment.

• Eugenics took root in America in the early twentieth century — some 33 states adopted forced sterilization programs to prevent the "feeble-minded" and other "defectives" from reproducing.

• Henry Fairfield Osborn, professor of biology and zoology at Columbia University from 1908-1933 and President of the American Museum of Natural History's Board of Trustees wrote: "The Negroid stock is even more ancient than the Caucasian and Mongolians, as may be proved by an examination not only of the brain, of the hair, of the bodily characteristics . . . but of the instincts, the intelligence. The standard of intelligence of the average adult Negro is similar to that of the eleven-year-old-youth of the species Homo Sapiens."

• In evolutionary theory, the survival advantage factor is the chief explanation for the existence of most differences. Because these differences result from the survival advantage that they confer upon an organism, an evolutionist must assume differences between or within a group likely exist because they provide some inherent survival advantage for the animal. Since the key survival advantage of humankind over "lower animals" is intelligence, consequently differences in this trait likely also exist between the races. This is exactly what has been assumed by many eugenicists, evolutionists, sociologists, and psychologists, both before and since the time of Darwin. This conclusion has justified a wide variety of governmental and scientific policies, not the least infamous were racial genocide programs.

• The two races most often compared are the "Caucasian" and "Negroid," now commonly called the "white" and "black" races. The dominant western cultural ethos, that whites were "superior"' and blacks "inferior"' and more "ape-like," was commonly reflected in science books published from 1880 and 1980.

• H. Klaatsch, a prominent German evolutionist, concluded that human races differ not only because of survival factors, but also for the reason that they evolved from different primates. The Blacks came from the gorillas, the Whites from the chimpanzees, and the Orientals from the orangutans, and it is for this reason that some races are superior. He concluded that "the gorilla and the Neanderthal man" have a close biological affinity to "a large number of the living African blacks . . ."

• In the 1920s, an article in the Encyclopedia Britannica, under the heading "Negro", said that the inherent mental inferiority of the blacks was even more marked than their physical differences and that no full blooded Negro has ever been distinguished as a man of science, a poet, or an artist.

• M. L. Moser (The Case Against Integration, 1974) says, "... American Negroes that have made contributions to various fields, sports, science, etc., but ... It is only that Negro that has a mixture of white genes in his system that has risen to the level where he has produced on the level with the white race."

• The racism which developed from the theory of evolution was by no means confined to Blacks. One of the leading American eugenicists, Charles Davenport, founder and director of the prestigious Cold Spring Harbor Biological Laboratory, concluded that Black Americans were below Caucasians-but so were several other groups. Among the groups that he included were 'the Poles, the Irish, the Italians, and . . . the Hebrews' and even the Serbians, Greeks, Swedes, and Bohemians.

• Mark H. Haller (Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought, 1984) writes: "[T]o understand attitudes of racial inferiority in the context of nineteenth-century science and social science is a first step in fathoming the depth of race prejudice in our own day. Inferiority was at the very foundation of their evolutionary framework and, remaining there, rose to the pinnacle of "truth " with the myth of scientific certainty. To see racial prejudices in their scientific robes is to understand why attitudes of racial inferiority have continued to plague western culture."

• At the US 1923 immigration hearings "many witnesses argued that "biology"' demanded the exclusion of most members of the Eastern and Southern European "races." "The primary reason for the restriction of the alien stream . . . is the necessity for purifying and keeping pure the blood of America."

• The result was that in April 1924 the immigration act was passed by overwhelming majorities in both the house and senate. President Calvin Coolidge supported the law, stating that, "America must be kept American. Biological laws show . . . that Nordics deteriorate when mixed with other races."

ADOLPH HITLER USED EVOLUTION AS HIS JUSTIFICATION FOR THE HOLOCAUST.

• Planned Parenthood Federation of America (See Abortion section) was started by a racist, Margaret Sanger, who drew upon writings from socialists and eugenicists. She even published articles from Adolf Hitler's director of eugenic sterilization, Ernst Rudin, and spawned "The Negro Project," her strategy for eliminating the black population. She believed in removing what she called "the dead weight of human waste." In the last week of July 2002, a lawyer in Missouri filed a federal lawsuit against Planned Parenthood for their failure to fully inform women about abortion. The lawyer also argued that Planned Parenthood is a racist organization that targets minority women.

• Natural Selection and the Columbine Killings

• Alfred Russell Wallace , one of the few 19th century non-racists, believed that the differences in behavior found between the black and white races, contrary to the conclusions of evolutionists around him, were because of cultural conditioning which "can integrate the rudest savage into our own most courtly life."

• Today, all human beings in the world today, are classified as Homo Sapiens and scientists now admit that, biologically, there really is only one race of humans.

• An ABC News science page stated, "More and more scientists find that the differences that set us apart are cultural, not racial. Some even say that the word 'race' should be abandoned because it's meaningless."

• The Bible does not even use the word "race" in reference to people, but does describe all human beings as being of "one blood" (Acts 17:26)

• Scientists found that if any two people from anywhere in the world were compared, the basic genetic differences between these two would typically be around 0.2 percent - even if they came from the same people group.

• So-called "racial" characteristics that many think are major differences (skin color, eye shape, etc.) account for only 6 percent of this 0.2 percent variation, which amounts to a mere 0.012 percent difference generically. In other words, the so-called "racial" differences are absolutely trivial.

• Recent IQ tests of people throughout the world have found that, with allowance for cultural differences, the IQ ranges of all extant identified races is extremely close. The pygmy population of Africa, supposedly the most backward race extant today, test close to average when acclimated to Western life. Few differences are found between the second and third generation pygmies living in large Australian cities who are acclimated to the established European population.

• It is now widely accepted that, given equality of background and similarity of experiences, blacks as a whole closely equal whites in across the-board performance. This confirms prominent anthropologist, Ruth Benedict's early conclusion that "the most careful investigation" shows there is no significant difference between the scores of blacks and whites, even though it is difficult to control for the accumulative effects of deprivation.

• Most studies also find that Orientals and Jews score about ten points higher than Europeans. Reasons other than innate differences are often found to account for this difference, and few scientists now accept the view that genetic differences can account for the level found.

• Recently, in Louisiana, African American State Representative Sharon Weston Broome charged that, "Darwin's ideas on how humans evolved are racist and the key reason for race problems [and] provide the main rationale for racism." As Broome logically concluded, "If evolution has provided the main rationale for racism, and we are teaching our children evolution in schools, then correspondingly we are teaching them racist principles."
Thursday, January 31, 2008 
Discovering truth requires the proposition of all respected and well-thought ideas. We cannot limit ourselves with only one view on the explanation of how life arose. We must present all plausible ideas and allow people to make their own judgments. We must understand that science is not fact. Therefore the relatively new idea of intelligent design should not remain resisted due to a close-minded education system. Human beings attempt to find truth and we will not find it with censored theories and blinding our nations students.