I thought Jesse Bailey gave us a very nice treat in today's reading from the Meno. It's always hard, at least for me, to take in all that someone says when they're reading a paper-- I mostly get waylaid by something suggestive in what they say, and lose track of the argument while lost in my little reveries; by the time I tune back in, I'm starting a new argument, as it were, in the middle and have to play catch up, until it happpens again (as it always will...)
Still, I thought I'd share my recollection, albeit patchy, if anyone's interested in comparing my pastiche with their own. I heard something like this (broadly reconstructed, and omitting, doubtless, many salient details--)
Meno represents something we probably all fall prey to: acquisitiveness, the desire to own some-thing (accent on the "thing", as we objectify in our very aquisitiveness.) When he asks Socrates for insight, he actually expects, as it were, to be handed wisdom, as if it were a piece of pizza or a check to be cashed at a later date. If I may offer an analogy, he wants to own that wisdom in the way one owns a work of art one has purchased-- not that there is anything wrong with owning art per se, but it would be wrong in many ways to claim thereby that one is also an artist (much less the artist) simply for owning the work in question. Obviously, making the art is what the artist does, and it is only her artistry which can be called evident, here.
Without making his own way to virtue, in short, there is no other way for Meno to become virtuous, only he doesn't know that because, on the one hand, he's a creature of habits formed unconsciously by simply being a part of the almagamation known so glibly to the college freshman as "society"-- that loose mass of undifferentiated, and ultimately inconsistent, principles or narratives which are the spotty result of our accidental human history, an inheritance bequeathed upon each of us by comittee, as it were. On the other hand, he carries the taint of groupthink with him in his search (or has when we first meet him, at any rate.) He insists that the thoughts ("philosophy") which might free him from that mass become thought-objects, ownable items, as above. Thus, if he has any hope of getting out of the charachter (unfree) which he has (but from which he is alienated), but has only by virtue of having found himself with it ( he is trapped in his "facticity", perhaps), it can only be by letting go of the grasping attitude which is the mass's only way of approaching ideas (the mass is fundamentally "fundamentalist", I guess.) It will take more charachter than someone with Meno's charachter to turn that trick, apparrently. There might be hope for us as readers, though...
Anyway, that's what I seemed to hear, although as I write it sounds further and further from what could really be called "recollection" on my part and more like something merely occassioned by the words I heard. Does anyone else have thoughts on this which they'd like to share?