MySpace
myspace music


Dean Wolfe



Last Updated: 12/18/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Status: Single
City: Toronto
State: Ontario
Country: CA
Signup Date: 7/25/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Thursday, December 17, 2009 


"There's a shadow on the road behind
There's a shadow on the road ahead
Nothing can stop [me] now"

-Neil Peart

Dean Wolfe on iLike - Add iLike to your MySpace

Thursday, December 17, 2009 

here's what's coming to me right now:

Firstly, forget that my last name is Wolfe- it would make the following analogy unflattering: 

Technology is great, but it can be used like a lambs skin hiding a wolf. In this case the wolf doesn't want to eat anything-- it's just hiding the fact that it's not a great songwriter. So in this analogy, lambs are much better songwriters than wolves. 

But there's something else. 

What does a band/artist want to achieve in recording an album? To sound as good as the Stones, the Beatles, Rush, Joni Mitchell etc? 

In one sense, it can be useful to strive for something that's touchable- symbolizing a goal you want to reach. 

But really- the goal is: to sound as much like yourself, as U2 sounds like itself, or Celine Dion sounds like herself. 
(but not at the same time of course- that would be perverse)

You see: that's hard. That's challenging. Why? The world doesn't generally encourage it. You initially may be loved because you sound like U2- and of course, they are immensely popular. So you must be well on your way.... or not. 

Does the world need another U2? Was U2 another 'band efg' when they appeared on the scene? "Oh wow U2-- you're awesome cuz you sound like 'band efg"!

Nope. And U2 - in a funny way- didn't become themselves overnight. It was a long gradual and challenging ascent. They were always themselves, but what I'm saying is they became more successful the more they became themselves. 

So my challenge as producer is helping the artist be honest with themselves- true to themselves- discover themselves- cuz the world doesn't want or need another Celine- Celine is the best Celine there is and can't be beat. No the challenge is much closer to home. How much can you discover about your real artistic original self on your next album?

Even Curt Cobain was quoted "Wanting to be someone else is a waste of the person you are."

I believe this whole-heartedly. And it sets a high bar--THE highest bar - and only bar, there is. 

Even the Bonos and Edges and Chris Martins face this same challenge every album. 

Edge made a comment about 'getting out of the way of' the song- so hey- he's noticed a pattern. Probably they see and can compare the results between a song that they willed into being versus a song that they 'got out of the way of' so it could shine through. 

That immediately resonated with me. There's a very spiritual aspect to song writing. And as a producer, I'm coaching and nurturing that same innate ability in all of us to GET TRANSPARENT.

Saturday, December 12, 2009 


...coming to a venue in the GTA near you!

We had our debut (minus our new upright bassist) at the Tequila Bookworm for the annual ecosanity.org party

Dean Wolfe on iLike - Add iLike to your MySpace

Wednesday, December 02, 2009 
Going to record/produce emerging talent for Bon Echo Recording.

Recording a Dean Wolfe Band CD of new material. 

Recording at least one 'kids song' that's proving popular among fellow parents and releasing as a single on iTunes (if I end up accumulating enough I'll do a dedicated CD)

Recording a Gospel CD- with a single to get released early in the year: cover of "Amazing Grace"

Record and release a Christmas single (again, with the longer term goal of doing a whole CD's worth at some point).

Going to play out as much as possible- come out and support independent music!

Playing a wedding- hope to play more- they actually pay which is always nice!
Monday, July 27, 2009 
this is reprinted from a comments page on newdirectionscello.com


Cello amplification!
If you want you can read an interview I just gave on this topic.www.drunkenmirmaid.com The acoustic cello is very hard to amplify well. All the transducer pickups fishman c100 etc. to my ear sound horrible. We must not settle for that scratchy, honky, sound. (That's after EQ of course!) After years of experimenting I use the AKG C 411, contact condenser microphone, placed one fingers distance above the bridge on the C string side. This actually sounds like a cello and is much less prone to feedback than a traditional microphone. It also takes to distortion/effects very well. I use this mic with a bodypack transmitter clipped onto the stings below the bridge, so I can be wireless (I play standing up). After a little EQ and some effects I am very happy with the sound. Now if you want just a little more breath and depth to the sound, and you have a low stage volume, you can attach an AKG 419 gooseneck to the tailpiece and aim the mic at the lower circle of the a-string f hole. This gives all the warm juicy overtones that we are used to and you can adjust the bass using the proximity effect. Just move the mic closer to the hole to get more bass, the reverse for less. OK, lets get really snobby. To really mic a cello, (studio, live recorded performance etc.) I suggest using a Neumann M149 (or a U87 will work) at least 5 feet from the cello. I personally have had great results placing the mic very close to the floor 1 ft. Just make sure you have a little carpet to place in front of the cello to dampen the slap back echo from the floor. Then I usually use a pair of Schoeps small diaphragm condensers as room/boundary mics (414s will work as well). For studio pre's I use an Avaloln 737 for the Neumann and a True Systems pre for the Schoeps. As far as pre's for the live rig the wireless transmitter for the AKG c411 has a preamp in it (which also provides phantom power). Going wired, just make sure you don't go too cheap. You're signal is only as good as it's weakest link. Mackie, Presonus, Soundcraft, FocusRite Platinum, Allen&Heath all make very good pre's. 9 times out of 10 the boards (mixer) pre's should be fine. Which comes to my final recommendation. I much prefer running the cello through the mixer and PA. It is nearly impossible to fill a room/compete with a drummer with just an amp onstage, with out feedback. Using the PA places your main source of signal in front of the band which greatly reduces this problem. Just make sure you have a good PA. I am VERY happy with my Mackie SRM450, handles the cello beautifully. If your still having problems with feedback, try an Ashley 31 band graphic EQ. It's good to have something like this, you never know, the resonant frequency of the room just might be your wolftone (the most prone to feedback, usually around 100Hz depending on your cello). I am demoing a Sabine feedback eliminator next week, I'll let you know. For monitoring you can use a small instrument amp or use the wedges that came with the PA, or if you're daring, try wireless in-ears. Shure has a great line. These are perfect for cellists, no feedback; you can adjust your mix of the band/your cello. Absolutely the best way to go for cello, and if you ever "make it big" you will be already used to the technology. Best of Luck, Alfred
www.alfredjamesband.com
Tuesday, April 01, 2008 
THis is pasted from TAXI website: thanks Taxi...

"How do I record a snare drum?"



Recommended mics: Shure SM57, AKG 414, Sennheiser 421, Neumann KM 84, Neumann KM 184



For the snare drum, it’s always a safe and highly effective choice to use the venerable Shure SM57. Bring it in from the audience side of the kit and give it a 45 to 60 degree angle with the capsule about an inch or two above the head. The farther away it is from the head, the roomier the sound, but the more potential you have for phase problems. The closer to the head you get, the more bottom end you’ll get&151;it will give you that "goosh-y" sound. By the way, it’s always a good idea to have the snare mic follow a line to the drummer’s crotch&151;not that it’s a particularly good sounding part of the anatomy, but because it’s away from the hi-hat and any potential leakage problems.



Recommended eq for the snare is: +2@100Hz on the bottom if necessary; roll off 300 to 700Hz in the lower mids to eliminate the box-like sound; and +2 to + 6 dbs @ 5, 8, or 10Khz to brighten up the top end. Tuning the snare is very important in getting the right sound. If you encounter undesirable ringing in the snare, try a small piece of gaffers’ tape. You can also try taping a small piece of a feminine napkin to the outer edge of the top head to eliminate over ring.



Remember that a snare is full of transients, so keep your levels fairly low to avoid overloading your preamp, tape machine, or the tape itself. -2 or -3 VU or + 2 or +3 peak reading are typical levels.



"How do I record a kick or bass drum?"



Favorite mics: Sennheiser 421, AKG D-12 or D-112



If the mic you’re using has a pad switch, use it. If not, pad the input at the console. Mic the kick drum from the audience side, but only after throwing a sandbag in the drum to weigh it down. Let the sandbag touch the head (that the beater hits) just enough to dampen out any obnoxious overtones, but not the good, natural sounding ones. The mic should be placed about half way in to the drum itself and pointing at the beater. If you bring the mic in from the right side of the drum and angle it at the beater you will be avoiding leakage from the snare drum, which is a good thing to do. You can experiment with the depth of the mic, but always keep the mic pointed at the beater for maximum attack. If you want a "poofier" kick sound, you can point the mic away from the beater, but again, try to avoid letting it point in the direction of the snare to minimize leakage. If you want a roomier sound, you can pull the mic out of the drum a little bit. The further out you pull it, the roomier it will get. Some engineers use a second mic a foot or two outside the kick. Be sure to check the phase relationship of the two kick mics if you try that technique. If you have phase cancellation problems, they will usually manifest themselves by canceling out the bottom end of the kick.



Eq: If you need more bottom end, try boosting @ 60 or 100Hz. Try rolling off lower mids (300-700Hz) to get rid of a box-like sound. To add more attack, try boosting in the 1K to 3K range.



Remember that a kick drum is full of transients, so keep your levels fairly low to avoid overloading your preamp, tape machine or the tape itself. -2 or -3 VU or + 2 or +3 peak reading are typical levels.



Tips: If you don’t have gobos to block incoming and outgoing leakage, try placing a moving blanket in a tent-like fashion around the mic stand and kick drum opening. Tune the kick drum up or down according to the key the song is in, making sure that the tuning works well with the register the bass guitar is in.



Thursday, March 27, 2008 

Category: Music
Sharing more that stood out to me:

Set a table and the hungry will come and eat.

How many albums have the Spice Girls sold? Lots. Do I or you own any? Not me. But they filled a niche for lots of folks out there.

Who’s to say my (your) unique brand of art doesn’t have an audience out there really waiting for what you have to offer, but might not know yet what it is that they;re waiting for?

A message that’s been coming to me a lot lately: GET YOUR MUSIC OUT THERE. GET IT OUT THERE!
Thursday, March 27, 2008 

Category: Music
I was listening to an interview with a successful s/s (singer-songwriter) and a small but potent tidbit got lodged into my thought.

She has a clear sense of the way business and art should work together. Make the art. Then do the business of figuring out how to sell it. Neglect neither aspect. But don’t blend: DON’T (my emphasis) write/produce music thinking about the business end i.e. is Joe Shmoe Label rep going to like these lyrics- oh, i better make them like this-- or is Sue Radio Programmer going to like this quirky hook better etc etc etc.....

Thank-you Truth for asserting yourself via this artist. Now I don’t mix. Just do the art thing. Then do the business of marketing the art.