MySpace


Tidejwe Dezod (Jon)



Last Updated: 5/21/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 30
City: LOGAN
State: Utah
Country: US
Signup Date: 9/17/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Saturday, December 27, 2008 

Current mood:Drowsy
I have long had a dream of finding a personalized/portable EEG device that I could use and program for mind reading, dream logging, etc. Based on my research and psychological studies, I've often told people that while it might be unethical, if I could have an EEG device constantly connected to a person's head to monitor all the electrical activity they had at all times, that with enough time, testing, and computer programming help, I could essentially read every single thought & feeling that person had. I have often wondered why nobody has created such a system, because it's so obvious, and was so sure that eventually it will come out, and I'll want one for personal use.

So I just watched a video for this new game/system by Emotiv Systems that connects up a small/portable EEG (electroencephalography) device to your head which simply monitors the electrical activity in your brain and performs commands based on pre-recorded commands that you associated with their corresponding thoughts.

For example, you focus on an object on the screen, and think about making it rotate. Then you have the software associate those thoughts (electrical activity) with rotation on the screen. You think about pulling or pushing an object, and record those similarly. You can record thoughts of anger or enjoyment, etc and it remembers what that looks like from pre-recorded electrical activity.

Thus far, the demonstrations I've seen have focused on promoting this device as a gaming system where you move around and do things in the game all by using your mind. While I think this is cool, I would prefer to use it for other things, like as a dream log. It would be cool to use one of these little EEG's to link certain thoughts/brain-waves to images or symbols and then have it record everything you think while you dream.

For example, you can think about a tree repeatedly and link those brain waves to a picture/symbol of a tree. Then while you're dreaming, if there is a tree in your dream it could record that thought. Since a lot of people supposedly think about sex in their sleep, it could also be interesting to link different thoughts about sex to different symbols, words or (non-pornographic) images to see what comes up in a dream. Since words are essentially symbols of concepts, I wonder if you could simply think about a word/concept and have the machine write for you while you simply think to yourself. It could also potentially record words and log everything you say or hear in a dream. The more thoughts you register in the system, the cooler it could be for a dream log's description and detail. You could register thoughts of specific family members or friends, thoughts of common activities, places you are familiar with, feelings, and many other things and have them all logged as they occur in your dreams.

It would also be interesting to have an alternate profile where you link things in reverse. Like in those games they have, if you are supposed to imagine being MAD to scare away these little balls of light, maybe you have to do the opposite and have thoughts of love and caring and link everything oppositely. Instead of pulling the object, you have to imagine pushing it instead.

Man, if these things aren't too expensive I'll certainly buy one...imagine the fun possibilities you could have just linking thoughts to certain things like that for personal use. I could go on and on about the possibilities with this device, but this is a good start. Supposedly it may be released in a few months from now.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008 

Category: Automotive
Not too long ago, Misty and I bought a dual fuel car.  It runs on both regular gasoline as well as Compressed Natural Gas.  Besides already needing a second vehicle, we were primarily interested in it for the amount we would save driving around.  I mean it only costs $0.639 per gallon everywhere in Utah!  That's AWESOME!

There are currently (April 29, 2008) about 18 public CNG stations in Utah.  I've mapped them all out with several details on each of them HERE.

We wanted a dual fuel vehicle for our first CNG car, and looked around online and found several out of state.  We primarily searched out of state because Utah allows you to take a $3000 state tax refund off a CNG car spread out up to 5 years.  Most places out of state we looked at were willing to ship them in to UT for you for about $300-$400.  Also there were several places willing to take a current vehicle and upgrade them to CNG for a couple thousand dollars...mostly for big vehicles like trucks, but supposedly conversions have some part of the engine that wears out a lot faster because CNG burns at a higher temp and some part of the vehicle needs to be replaced more often from what I hear.

While we were looking, my brother in law got a dual fuel car in at the dealership he worked at, and so we decided to get the one he had.  It was a 2001 Chevy Cavalier with about 54,000 miles on it and cost us about $5,500.  If you consider the $3000 tax credit we get, it's actually only costing us about $2,500.

The CNG tank is only a 6 gallon equivalent, with a PSI of 3600 and takes up about half of the trunk space in the small car.  CNG vs regular gas MPG are basically the same.  Unfortunately, most stations in UT only pump between 2500-3000 PSI though, so we rarely get the whole 6 Gallon usage out of it.  One time the Park City station did pump higher than our PSI rating, and when we took the pump off the tank, it started hissing Natural gas back out the tank until it was at the proper 3600 PSI.  It was scary at first, but at least we know what happens when you over fill a CNG tank.  Nothing drastic.

A Newspaper article recently came out about a new CNG station opening in Brigham City, and how Utah has more CNG stations per capita than anywhere else.  Supposedly there were so many people calling dealerships asking if they had CNG cars that some made contracts with places to do conversions for those who want them.  I've started to see lots more CNG vehicles at the stations more and more since we've had our car.  Tons of people talk to us about them too, asking for pointers on how to get them, etc.  Newbies are always really excited about getting their new cars and talk to other CNG owners at the pumps, etc.  It's kind of funny.  CNG is really picking up in Utah.

The Natural Gas price savings more than pays for our car loan on the new vehicle every month.  It's kind of stunning to see how having TWO CARS, even one with a monthly loan payment on it, is STILL CHEAPER than having ONE regular gasoline car for us.  We've decided that we'll probably eventually sell off our Lumina and get a CNG or dual fuel Truck or van.

I haven't looked into it much, but supposedly you can also get a little CNG converter to hook up to your house gas line so you can fill up at home instead of having to drive to a CNG station.  If I knew I was going to be living somewhere for a few years, I'd be tempted to install one just for the convenience.  You can fill it up over night or whenever, and have it come straight out of your Monthly utility bill for even cheaper.

Anyway, it's nice to be getting gas 5-6 times cheaper, and have a second car with a loan for cheaper than we were paying for a single regular gas car that was already paid off.  Of course we travel between Logan-Kaysville at least a couple times a month, and Misty drives around doing parking enforcement up here for a few hours at night, so I guess we do drive quite a bit too.

Feel free to ask questions.

I will update my blog entries here on myspace, MSN Spaces, etc with new developments on Utah CNG (map updates, exact to call to see if VIN eligible for tax rebate, etc) for those I notice are finding my posts through searching the net.

Saturday, March 08, 2008 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
I wrote a book review on Facebook today for the book:  History of Joseph Smith by His Mother Lucy Mack Smith: The Unabridged Original Version (Hardcover) - by R. Virnon Ingleton (Compiler)

I wrote a similar review on Amazon just from memory almost 3 years ago which is currently rated as the most helpful review on the book (of course there are only 3 reviews total as of the time of this blog).  Anyway, since I consider this particular version of the book one of the best LDS books ever (on my top 10 for sure), I have decided to post my recent facebook book review as a blog as well to explain WHY some of you would also really appreciate this book.  Here is my review:

This is absolutely the BEST version of Lucy Mack Smith's "Biography" of her son.  For those unaware, the book has gone through several versions as follows:

Rough Draft Manuscript
Fair-copy manuscript
1853 edition
"RLDS Versions"
The Improvement Era Edition (1902)
The Preston Nibley Edition

At one point, Brigham Young even denounced the book as "a tissue of lies" and warned the saints of dire consequences if they didn't turn in all copies of the book to the church to be destroyed, saying that it contained falsehoods; scribes had fictionalized the work; William Smith (Joseph's "black-sheep" brother according to the church) was portrayed positively; Orson Pratt published it out of greed and without Brigham's consent; the project was stolen; and Lucy's memory was shot.  Brigham offered other books or store goods in exchange for turning in the book to be destroyed.

Nearly a year after his denouncement of the book, Brigham decided the book held some potential merit and consented to prepare the book for republication to be sent out to "ALL THE WORLD" with several "errors" being corrected under the direction of Wilford Woodruff, assistant church historian at the time (mainly with George A Smith and Elias Smith to help him).  Approximately 78 corrections were made at this time, at which point the now updated version sat for over 35 yrs until a while after Brigham's death.

THIS edition, compiled by R Vernon Ingleton, takes the original 1853 edition as the backbone, and adds in missing "treasures" which were in the rough draft manuscript by putting them in a different font so you know things that were in the draft which nobody has ever seen before in any of the other editions that Lucy originally thought was worth sharing, that never made it into a final printed copy.  Another font is used to depict things Lucy's scribe notated from things Lucy said that also never made it into print.

Things that were REMOVED in editions after the 1853 edition are set in a sort of corner type brackets ?Like these?

And so on and so forth with differences between the different versions, including footnotes for further clarifications, insights, notes, etc.

Whether you have already read one of the other editions or not, I highly recommend THIS version as it has combined all previous editions with added tidbits never before publicly available.  If you are merely curious what was changed or taken out of the original version, get this book.  I have to think Brigham must not have read the book himself before he made those statements, as all the changes were quite minor and unimportant.  If you are simply curious what they left out from the rough draft, get this version too!  I'd say that by far and large the greatest reason to get THIS version is for all the additional information from the Rough Draft that was never added into the printed editions.  These little extras are certainly valuable treasures in and of themselves.

No other version or edition comes close to matching this one, and I've read through and checked out many of them.  If you were unsure before now, get this version of the book.  You won't regret it.

Currently reading:
Empire (Tor Science Fiction)
By Orson Scott Card
Release date: 27 November, 2007
Tuesday, February 05, 2008 

Category: Life
Some time ago when my Uncle Sterling died, it was brought to my attention that President Boyd K Packer proclaimed that funerals are NOT supposed to talk about the person, or eulogize them, etc. In "The Unwritten Order of Things", President Packer seems to take this to an extreme in my opinion. He says that the Family members shouldn't be ALLOWED to choose who will speak, or for how long or on what they should talk about. He even goes on to say that funerals should really only talk about the Atonement, resurrection, how WE have the truth in this church etc and to use it as a missionary opportunity.  We're NOT supposed to talk about the person who died, or their life, etc. He actually said that if someone tries to talk about him at HIS funeral that he'll raise up and correct them.

I personally think President Packer is overboard on this one by stating his personal opinions as if they are churchwide policies from the Lord that should be followed (It should be mentioned that Packer's policies are actually stricter than the General Handbook of Instructions). If funerals quit talking about the person, stopped being eulogies, or funny and good stories to remember the person, etc and only talked about church stuff and simply being held to try to convert the non-members in attendance, I know that I for one would NEVER go to them anymore...that's what I go to church for.

I was extremely pleased to see that Packer's policies were NOT followed for President Hinckley's funeral.  In fact, though not a big deal, the General Handbook of Instructions' policies weren't even strictly followed (videos/slides were actually used against handbook policy).  Hinckley's funeral was a good tribute to a remarkable man, though it certainly was a eulogy.  In my opinion, funerals would really SUCK and be nearly pointless to attend if you weren't allowed to talk about the deceased at all as Packer has suggested.

For me personally, I'm not saying that I want people to only say GOOD things about me at MY funeral, on the contrary, I'd prefer something ala "Speaker of the Dead" if it were possible for someone like Ender to actually do it right.  For those of you who haven't read the Ender's Game series (I would highly recommend it), in that book, "Speakers" research the dead person's life and give a speech that attempts to speak for them, describing the person's life as he or she tried to live it. This speech is not an apology/defense, but rather a way to understand the person as a whole, INCLUDING any flaws or misdeeds.  Several years ago, my good friend Wendy who knew a lot of my good and bad, intent and all, once said that she'd be willing to do a "speaking" on me some day because she probably understood me the best based on everything we'd talked about and been through.  If it could be done right, I'd totally love to have a real funeral like those in the books.  Unfortunately, such "speakings" seem to take a while to compile correctly and clearly.  Maybe a person realistically has to write thier own "speaking" but then it's so easily subject to unitentional bias, whether intentionally or not.  Maybe some of my family and friends could do a decent job at it if they worked together.

Regardless, not that I intend to die soon, but I still want to make it CLEAR to people I know that they are NOT to follow President Packer's policies for MY funeral even if it has to be held out of a church building and by someone other than the Bishop, etc...the General Handbook states that the Bishop is in charge and decides EVERYTHING if it's in the church (which could lead to unwanted policies), so IF it MUST be held elsewhere to be done properly, then so be it...otherwise it doesn't matter.  At the very LEAST (if not a real "speaking" as mentioned above), I'd prefer funny stories about me, even embarrassing stories, good memories, things I was known for, the type of employee I was, etc. Sure, of course church/gospel stuff and my beliefs, etc were a big part of my life...I mean I was/am absolutely obsessed with church history for example.  It has literally consumed my life in MANY ways as many of you know...but such things like gospel subjects should also be put in context with the rest of the funeral RELATED to the deceased (which is the ACTUAL reason people came in the first place).  When I go to funerals I go with the intention to remember the deceased and their life, who they were, how they lived, etc.  A memorial, tribute, etc.  Not to hear a Sacrament meeting talk or missionary discussion that's unrelated to why we all showed up.  The absudity!  I assume others would come to mine similarly.  The best funerals I've ever been to (like that of my friend/Co-worker Kristen as a GREAT example) have followed the things discussed in this paragraph.

You know, for Joseph Smith's funeral, he had everyone dress in ALL WHITE instead of any black. I would prefer that as well.  Not that I expect anyone would go through with it (maybe if it was announced in the obituary or something), but the whole "everybody dress all in black" for mourning thing is kinda creepy weird  to me to be honest.  I've never really understood the point.  I LOVE the all in white idea that accompanied Joseph's funeral.  That's so beautiful!

Also, I wouldn't MIND if I was cremated into one of those new lifegem diamonds or something similar/cheaper instead of the traditional methods which typically cost more overall both economically and environmentally in the long run.  I think lifegems are kind of cool, and much better than traditional gravesites, etc which will eventually inevitably cause a problem with population and environment issues, etc anyway.  Meh, do whatever you guys want with my body when I'm dead.  I suppose it doesn't matter to me at that point.

You know, an LDS author once suggested that everyone should write out their answers to the following questions for their own benefit (feel free to respond in the comments or your own blog):

What would you like to be said about you at your funeral?
What do you EXPECT to be said about you at your funeral?
From a Family member?
From a Co-Worker?
From a Friend?
Any others in particular?
Anything specific you want done at your funeral?

Perhaps I'll answer those myself in a future blog.  I've been meaning to do that for the last 9 years now since I was first asked to do so, and haven't gotten around to it yet.

Currently reading:
New Moon (Twilight, Book 2)
By Stephenie Meyer
Release date: 21 August, 2006
Thursday, June 28, 2007 

Category: School, College, Greek
My brother Jeff and his wife Beth moved in with us for a month while we wait to move into our new apartment complex we bought together.  We've been playing this new Nintendo Wii game lately called "Big Brain Academy" together alot and I was doing so well on it. 

Misty, obviously looking for excuses as to why she's not beating me in the smartness game, dug up one of my old essays I wrote on sleep deprevation and sent it to me claiming that I'm only beating her in the smartness game because of what I said in this essay since Kiara keeps waking her up to eat every couple/few hrs!  Pshh...excuses...   

Anyway, I'd almost forgotten about this essay, but it really is full of amazing information, and entertaining at that.  I got an A on all my essays, including this one, and my teacher asked if they could use them as an example of EXACTLY the type of stuff they were looking for in the assignments for future classes...including this essay.  I figured it's been a while since I've posted a blog, and this would be a nice break from my Religious philosophy posts for some of you.  :)

READ IT!  You won't regret it!


It's a Bigger Deal than You Thought

             You stagger to your left as you make an effort to clear your dizzy head and attempt to stumble forward.  Your eyes are all glazed over with a distant blurry glare at nothing while slowly nodding off.  It's all you can do not to just pass out, falling into the snow bank to rest your two-ton eyelids.  You could probably fool any cop, but no, you only wish you were drunk or stoned right now.  At least that would be more fun than all the crazy effects that go along with a bad night's rest.  Studies show that missing as little as one hour of needed sleep can impair both your mental and physical feats just as much as two alcoholic drinks could.  "If you sleep only 4 to 6 hours a night for 2 straight weeks, your brain will function about as well as it would if you'd stayed up for 3 nights in a row," says Hans P.A. Van Dongen, Ph.D., lead author of the study.  Luckily, sleep deprivation is cumulative, so a night or two of good rest can sober us right up without a hangover.

            The causes of sleep deprivation vary between people and most are generally deliberate.  Some of us lose sleep due to work or even just family and friends.  We could even go the other direction and stay up late because it's the only time we get to ourselves (like me).  Different foods and drinks can also affect how late we stay up, and of course there will always be stress and anxiety to keep us up due to things like tests, and Christmas.  Hopefully as we mature most of us don't often get scared sleepless after nightmares, though there are cases where we're unable to avoid certain other very unfortunate traumatic events in our lives (my sympathies to them).

            There are some causes which are rather surprising to learn.  For instance, Pilcher and Huffcutt found that sleeping intermittently for short periods of time (even naps, or hitting the snooze button a few times), can be worse than staying up all night long, at least in regard to test performance.  They have come to the conclusion that this is because such actions send signals to confuse the biological clock, which creates a greater sleep debt.  However, staying up all night has been shown to stimulate the body into some kind of an emergency mode that will permit it adjust to a sleepless state, and secrete more cortisol for energy.  Napping, if longer than 30 minutes, will make you groggy.  Sleeping in on weekends will also throw off the biological clock and cause sleeplessness, so in some ways it is not good to simply assume that "catching up on weekends" will work. . . at least it may take your biological clock a few days to get back to normal sleeping habits (assuming your intention is to get back to healthy sleeping habits of course).

            Believe it or not, age and gender also play a role in our sleep deficits.  Kantrowitz & Springen state that, "Researchers have found adolescents' natural body clock keeps them up until at least 11pm."  This severely hurts these adolescents as most schools start early in the morning, and thus lack of sleep is virtually unavoidable.  Contrary to popular belief, it's not the amount of sleep required for an individual that decreases with age, it's the capacity for being able to stay asleep that changes with old age.  Women tend to be sleep deprived more frequently than men.  Men, however, are at a greater risk of not being able to cope with that stress and all the factors that coincide with a lack of sleep.

            As previously mentioned, occasionally you even find those people who don't have much choice in whether they sleep well or not.  It may even be a sleep disorder, or a biological/chemical balancing factor.  In either case, they are subject to the same risks and symptoms as the rest of us, though they may possibly be more habituated with how to deal with the adverse side-affects.  Even insomniacs experience periods of "microsleep" sessions for fractions of a second long in REM which is long enough to keep a person alive.  The difference is that typical chronic sleep deprivation may feel ok to you, not because five to seven hours of sleep is all that you need, but perhaps because you don't even remember what it feels like to be fully rested and awake anymore.  Besides, the effects are frequently cloaked with different stimulants; and whether it affects your performance or not, it will often affect your health.

            Thus we see that the cause can vary differently from person to person, but the effects of such actions are almost always consistent and fairly predictable from case to case regardless of the reason or cause behind the lack of sleep.  Some of these effects are well known and commonly recognized, while others are astonishing and sometimes more subtle to discover.

            Besides obviously just plain being tired, one of the most significant physiological consequences induced upon an individual for sleep deficit is the highly increased amounts of cortisol which is secreted.  Cortisol, also called "the stress hormone" or "the death hormone" by many scientists, is a steroid type hormone that regulates blood pressure, cardiovascular function, and the body's use of proteins, carbohydrates and fats.  Any kind of stress, whether it is physical or psychological, sets off a chain reaction by increasing cortisol secretion which causes a breakdown of muscle protein, which in turn releases amino acids that are used by the liver to synthesize glucose for energy, thus raising the blood sugar level so the brain will have more glucose as fuel.  It also releases lots of "fatty acids" from the fat cells for the muscles.  The reason cortisol is termed "the death hormone" is because it actually prepares our body to die.  While cortisol increases with age, it makes the growth hormones decrease, which causes us to age.

            Thus we can see that with this one factor alone, lacking sleep can cause potential serious detrimental side-effects.  Blood sugar levels can sky-rocket as can blood-pressure itself.  It can lead to depression, and cause instability in many other hormones such as growth.  It degrades memory encoding and retrieval and if consistently high, will even cause reduced muscle-mass.  It impairs your immune system, and activates fat storage enzymes in cells which will help cause obesity.

            Even a short amount of deprived sleep will cause other physiological repercussions akin to slow reflexes and poor motor skills to occur.  We're all used to seeing people with black circles under their eyes, but you can't see how staying awake too long builds up adenosine, which is believed to make the brain fatigued.

            Studies on the cognitive effects of missing out on sleep-time have shown that it causes reduced performance in an assortment of mental tasks and problem solving.  We already mentioned that it affects the encoding and retrieval of memory, but it is important to note that this severely damages the learning process.  It even goes so far as to decrease writing and speaking skills, which is enough evidence in and of itself to prove that the amount of sleep attained at night does have a strong correlation to the grade received in a given class (at least classes that use writing and speaking skills such as a language class), or even on a lower scale such as a single test.

            Of all of the symptoms of sleep deficiency, perhaps the most misdiagnosed is that of depression.  Sleep deprivation has nearly all the same symptoms of depression.  You feel like there is a great lack of energy, irritability, difficulty concentrating, major mood swings, etc.  It is all there.  Some individuals may even end up on medication for it for years, being treated for a malady which they do not even contain.

            Ever wonder why people are so irritated when they haven't slept?  Dreaming is a key participant in how our bodies rejuvenate itself.  A normal good quality dream pattern will begin with negative dreams at first, and gradually decrease by morning.  "Dreaming is a mood-regulatory process that helps you get rid of anger and other emotional issues," explains Rosalind Cartwright, Ph.D., director of the Sleep Disorder Service and Research Center at Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center in Chicago.  If we do not attain the necessary amount of sleep, then we are not able to cope with our problems as effectively, the cortex part of our brain (the cognitive/thinking/rational part) shuts down and we begin running on "limbic brain" which basically means we're controlled by emotions, and our inhibitions are weakened severely, all of which can make us appear to be bi-polar or have major mood swings.  This in turn negatively affects our relationships with other people, including family, friends and work.

            The negative consequences for staying up late and sacrificing our sleep (intentionally or not) will almost always far outweigh the benefits (assuming you are intentionally losing sleep).  A lack of sleep causes increased stress and anxiety, and ironically increased stress and anxiety increases lack of sleep into a never ending cycle.  The solution?  Calm down, relax, try to avoid the whole mess in the first place and just go to bed earlier and for more time.

 


Works Cited

Alberts, Nuna. "The Healing Power of Sleep." Good Housekeeping;. 230.3 (2000): 55

Christodoulou, George N., and George N. Papadimitriou.  "Gains From Lost Sleep." Mental Health Letter; Jan. 1994: 10.7, 7.

Goh, Victor Hng-Hang, et al. "Effects of One Night of Sleep Deprivation on Hormone Profiles and Performance Efficiency."  Military Medicine, 166.5 (2001): 427-431.

Kantrowitz, Barbara.  "Why Sleep Matters".  Newsweek 22 Sept. 2003: 75

McGinnis, Marianne, Drozd, Shelly. "Sleep It Off." Prevention; 55.6 (2003): 82.

"Paging Mr. Sandman."  Nursing; Sept. 2000: 30.9, 74.

Stieg, Bill; Goins, Liesa.  "Snooze and Lose".  Men's Health Sept. 2003: 56.

 "Too Little Sleep Impairs the Way Your Body Handles Food." Tufts University Health & Nutrition Letter; Mar. 2000: 18.1, 3.

 

 Anyway, let me know what you think!

Currently playing:
Big Brain Academy: Wii Degree
Release date: 12 June, 2007
Wednesday, June 06, 2007 

Current mood:  tired
Category: Life
They Induced Misty Monday June 4th around 8pm and told us it would take around 12 hrs before she went into labor, and then another 12-20 hrs before she actually delivered.  It went a lot quicker than that (only took about 5 hrs total).  Our daughter, Kiara was born 06/05/07 (3 weeks early) at 1:08am.  4lbs 7 Ounces. 17 inches.  She was born with a lot of hair!  Both baby and mother are doing fine.  We anticipate both Misty and our daughter will come home Thursday Morning (June 7th).

As per the name...we started with a list of 60-70 names and narrowed it down to a handful by this afternoon.We finally decided on Kiara (pronounced Kee-Are-Uh), because we like how it sounds, etc.  Since thinking about the name, we've also discovered it is based on a Latin word meaning Clear/bright/light...in other languages it's a variant spelling of a word meaning something else, like in Irish, it can mean dark...maybe that makes it a balanced yin-yang name or something, or maybe when she's being good it's the Latin one, and when she's being bad it's the Irish one. lol  Middle name will be the same as Misty's middle name = Dawn.

After Misty gets out of the hospital, I'm sure her blog/picture section will have more as days go on, so I'd recommend checking her profile/blog.

Qwest said I could basically take off the next 6 months if I wanted to.  LOL  I need the money though, since we're buying a 5-plex (apartment building) and just had a baby, so I'll prob go back in next week.  Anyway, myspace is blocked on the hospital's wifi...I got a few proxies to work a bit, but they were really limited, so we haven't been able to post things.  I came home to sleep for a bit and thought I'd post the details for now.  Anyway, it's off to bed with me.  Enjoy the picts:


Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Currently playing:
Super Paper Mario
Release date: 10 April, 2007
Sunday, June 03, 2007 

Current mood:  relieved
Category: Religion and Philosophy
I wrote this blog about a year and a half ago, but apparently never posted it here...I since have some other alternate interpretations of these verses as well (mostly thanks to Luke's explanations of Hebrew/Jewish tradition/Talmud, etc that I seem to like), but I think the one I present here is still an interesting theory other people would appreciate reading.


This topic deals with the argument that according to the creation accounts (at least if taken literally) God created light and darkness chronologically before he even created the Sun, moon or other "light sources" (compare Genesis 1:4, 14).  Scientifically this doesn't appear to be possible, though there are theories/opinions that twist it to claim that the light came from the light of Christ etc. Of course this still does not answer many other details of the matter (especially since the Light of Christ is EVERYWHERE, and most of us can't physically see it anyway).

One possibility I have come up with is that Genesis 1:4 is talking about the premortal life "War in Heaven". The passage: "God said let there be light" could even POSSIBLY be referring to having spirit children.

Let me explain: For instance, we know that some of the greatest spirits were called "Son of the Morning" (yes Lucifer used to hold this title, but we're told it is also a Title for Christ [also called the morning star and day star in the Bible] and OTHERS, plural; besides prophetic statements claiming Lucifer was not the ONLY Son of the Morning, you can simply use common sense by noticing that the scripture says he was "A Son of the Morning", and not "THE Son of the Morning" implying that there were others.) which also explains why God would call "the light Day and the darkness he called Night" as the word "Morning" is associated with "Day" time. This means at one time Lucifer was a son of Light, a major leader in God's cause before he fell.

Also take note that in Gen. 1:5 the words "Day" and "Night" are capitalized (see the verses below for example), but they aren't capitalized in the other verses that mention day or night, even the SAME words later in that same verse are not capitalized.  This seemingly random capitalization is in all three counts of the creation story (Genesis, Moses and Abraham).  Day and Night are capitalized like proper-nouns every time it mentions that God separated the light from the darkness.  It is an interesting thing to note at least.

You see, the act of following God is "light and truth" while going against Him is darkness and evil by simple definition. Thus dividing the light from the darkness could be referring to dividing those who are loyal from those who are rebelling.  God separated the Light/Day (like TRUE/LOYAL sons of the Morning) from the dark/night (those who have FALLEN from God's grace). This sufficiently explains why the light and darkness were separated before He even created the sun, moon and stars (other suns) to give off any light to divide.  The verse is speaking somewhat metaphorically between the light and dark spirits/countenances/personalities (dividing the wheat from the tares, the good from the bad, etc).  This also explains why it is the FIRST thing to happen in the creation account.  The war in heaven happened right after the plans were presented, but before any action on the creation actually took place.  Since the casting out of Satan happened before the creation, it is only right that it should be mentioned first (Random thought...if you believe Satan has been sent to Earth...then if he was cast out before the Earth/creation was completed, where did he go if there was no Earth yet?).

I have also reviewed all the original ancient Hebrew words from this chapter and their meanings.  The meanings of key words will be explained with the verses.  Literal translations of the verses in question will be presented, and afterward we will dissect certain individual words and their other meanings/definitions.  You can simply use these verses to refer to as I talk about them:

Gen1:3-5
3. And said,
Gods
Let there be
light:
and there was
light

4. And saw
Gods
the light
that
it was
good:
and divided
Gods
the light
from
the darkness

5. And called
Gods
the light
Day,
and the darkness
they called
Night.
And were
the evening
and
the morning
the day.
first

Gen 1:14-15
14 And said,
Gods
Let there be
lights
in the firmament of
the heaven
to divide
the day
from
the night;
and let them be
for signs,
and for seasons,
and for days,
and years

15 And let them be
for lights
in the firmament of
the heaven
to give light
upon
the earth:
and it was
so.

OK, so those are the verses in question.  Now the Hebrew word for light that was used in Verses 3-5 can ALSO be translated to mean happiness or even morning.  The word divided is ALSO sometimes translated to mean separate, distinguish differ, select, etc.  The word darkness in these verses can also be translated to mean misery, destruction, death, ignorance, sorrow, & wickedness. So in Hebrew, we could just as easily choose to translate those verses as saying: "God divided happiness from wickedness."  Or that God divided the happy/good spirits from those who were wicked, and ignorant (and now sorrowful for being cast out of God's presence for rebellion).  He was keeping their misery and destruction of God's kingdom separate from those who would be happy by following God.  The "DARK" spirits were "death" and thus suffered spiritual death from God.  ALL of the known definitions for the words light/darkness that were used in Hebrew could EASILY support a theory about it meaning the war in heaven.

On top of that, the word Day comes from an unused root meaning to be hot.  It is sometimes used figuratively and it's possible uses are as follows: age, + always, + chronicles, continually (-ance), daily, ([birth-], each, to) day, (now a, two) days (agone), + elder, X end, + evening, + (for) ever (-lasting, -more), X full, life, as (so) long as (...live), (even) now, + old, + outlived, + perpetually, presently, + remaineth, X required, season, X since, space, then, (process of) time, + as at other times, + in trouble, weather, (as) when, (a, the, within a) while (that), X whole (+ age), (full) year (-ly), + younger

The word Night on the other hand means properly a twist (away of/from the light), i.e. night; and is sometimes translated as adversity

Think about that, God called the good spirits a never ending Chronicle, a birth, full of life; and the wicked, miserable, destructive, ignorant spirits he called adversity, or twisted (away from the light).  Lucifer twisted the minds of one third part of the hosts of heaven to turn away from the light and become adversity to God's plan.  The words fit quite well with this theory.

OK, so on to verse 14 and 15.  The word for light or lights in verse 14 and the first light in 15 is an ENTIRELY DIFFIERENT word than that used in verses 3-5.  I can't do the weird symbols, but as best as can be managed in ASCII characters, the word for light in verses 3-5 was 'or while the word in 14 and 15 is me'oroth. The difference is that the one in 14 and 15 specifically means properly a luminous body or luminary, i.e. (abstractly) light (as an element); figuratively brightness, i.e. cheerfulness; specifically a chandelier.  Now the last light mentioned in verse 15 is an entirely different word from the previous two words also, it is hair and it means to be (causatively make) luminous (literally and metaphorically)  also sometimes translated as (be, en-, give, show) X break of day, glorious, kindle,light (-en, -ened), set on fire, shine.  I find it interesting that the Hebrew Bible uses 3 different words for light between these few verses, especially when the one in question can so easily be taken to mean happiness while the others are obviously talking about real light from a light source.  Why did God not use the Hebrew word hair in verses 3-5 to make it clear He was talking about REAL light like he did in verses 15?  Why would He intentionally leave a difference between them to signify they mean something different?  Perhaps it is because verses 3-5 are REALLY talking about the war in heaven, while 14 and 15 are actually talking about the element of light.

With this theory, there is nothing scientifically wrong or contradictory with the whole light/darkness issue as there would be with traditional interpretations believing light and darkness were created before a light source even existed.  Both verse 4 and verse 14 are talking about entirely different events.  God did not create light twice, or create light before a light source.  Those verses don't have to contradict themselves (of course how the Sun was created AFTER the Earth, and after plant life upon the Earth (which need sunlight), though BEFORE mammal life is still a scientific problem if you are a creation LITERALIST).

I just thought I would share this interpretation because I think it warrants more consideration and research.  Comments, suggestions, etc on the matter are welcome.

-Jon Carver
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Currently playing:
Mario Party 8
Release date: 29 May, 2007
Friday, May 04, 2007 

Current mood:  pensive
Category: Religion and Philosophy

In one of the forum discussions I was involved in, we were talking about sealings and relatively recent church policy changes regarding such.   After having posted the official policies listed in the Church Handbook of Instructions, something caught my eye about child sealings.  Let us examine what is said:

If a woman who has been sealed to a former husband remarries, the children of her later marriage are born in the covenant of the first marriage unless they were born after the sealing was canceled or after it was revoked due to excommunication or name removal.

Living children who are Born in the covenant or have been sealed to parents cannot be sealed to any other parents.

Children who are born in the covenant or sealed to their parents remain so even if the sealing of the parents is later (1) canceled or (2) revoked by the excommunication or name removal of either parent.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on these matters, and for now let us first examine an example:

Your parents get sealed in the temple, then they have you as a kid.  Later they get a divorce.  Your mom remarries a guy without getting the first sealing canceled yet.  She has a baby with your new step-dad.  The handbook says the new baby is not sealed to your step dad at all, nor will it ever be his child in the eternities, instead your mom and step-dad's new baby is actually still born in the covenant but sealed to your mom and your biological dad even though they are legally divorced and remarried...it is not sealed to the new baby's biological dad.  This is inferred from the Bible where it says if someone remarries a widow, they are creating children for the first husband.  In this sense, the new baby isn't your half brother/sister, being born in the covenant of your mom and biological dad's original marriage/sealing, the baby is rightfully the son/daughter of your dad, not it's REAL dad.  WEIRDNESS.

Now, let us say that your biological parents' sealing is finally canceled by the First Presidency.  It says that YOU are still sealed to both of them even though they aren't sealed to each other anymore.  On top of that, now that the original sealing is broken, let's say your mom gets sealed to her new husband (your step dad) in the temple, and your biological dad also remarries and gets sealed to his new wife in the temple.  That first baby your mom and step-dad had BEFORE they were sealed together....well, that baby is still sealed to YOUR biological dad, not the baby's own biological dad because it was born in the covenant of your mom's first marriage, and according to the Church Handbook of Instructions, child sealings can't EVER be broken canceled or redone....Only marriage sealings can ever be broken, canceled and redone.  So your half brother/sister is stuck being sealed to a father they have possibly never met...and not their own biological father they grow up with.

In other words, besides the obvious recommendation of hoping to never have to remarry in the first place…girls, if you do ever have to remarry…make sure to stick on birth control at least until your first sealing is canceled.  Men, if you marry a woman who's been sealed before, you might want to make sure that first sealing of hers gets canceled before you have a baby...or her ex-husband will apparently be the REAL father of your first born for the rest of eternity.  :)


Personally, I think the Church Handbook of Instructions is simply wrong in this case...but regardless of my own opinion, that's the church's official stance on the matter and
is exactly what the Church's General Handbook says.  No matter what happens, and no matter how sealings are canceled, broken, etc the sealing between you and your parents can NEVER be broken, even if the sealing between your mom and dad is directly broken.  After having read what the Church Handbook says it makes one think that MAYBE traditional assumptions about the purpose of sealings MIGHT be somewhat misunderstood to some degree...especially when you take into account how God is known to play games with semantics like He did in D&C 19.  Who knows.

Incidentally, anyone have any sources or information on the supposed (relatively) recent policy change of allowing widows to be sealed to a second husband without having to get a sealing cancelation first?  I know this has been allowed with the deceased…seal a woman to all husbands she had in life…but supposedly there are several recent examples where living widows (women whose first husbands are deceased) are able to get sealed to a second husband without canceling the sealing of the first (the ASSUMPTION being it will be worked out in the here-after).  Also, what's up with Children's sealings sticking to both parents even if their own sealing was canceled?  That's kind of…surprising.  How/why does that work?

Thoughts, Comments, questions, concerns?

 

Currently reading:
Alcoholics Anonymous - Big Book 4th Edition
By AA Services
Release date: 10 February, 2002
Tuesday, March 27, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
With the new anti-mormon video that came out, it reminded me about an old email I wrote/sent once.  I think I got a lot of help with this from somewhere, it's been so long ago I don't remember the details.  Anyway, in the new anti video it tries to claim the First Vision Accounts contradict each other.  When viewed in this form, side by side, I think they actually give us a FULL understanding of what actually happened in the First Vision and are not contradictory...in fact they really support each other and are WONDERFUL!  Well, his age differs between them all, but I read a good explanation on that once.  Maybe I'll have to add it in at the bottom later.  I think a comparison like this should be added into our canon of Scripture!  What do you think?

EDIT:  This was too long and I've listed a better one in my comments section if you really care to see a comparison.  I've started working on combining all 9 seperate accounts into a single account.  I will post that later.
Currently reading:
The Eternity Code: Artemis Fowl, Book 3 (Unabridged)
Monday, March 26, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
This is another blog that is being written for use in my future debates in the Myspace forums I am always in. Since this topic comes up SOOOO Frequently, I've agreed to turn my arguments into a blog to simply link to here, especially since I know of no other more complete list of sources than I have. If you have some I am missing, PLEASE post them. I lost some that I once had, so I know there are more out there (in other words, this blog is subject to being updated in the future).

Now first off, I am not judging those in the LDS church who either drink or don't drink caffeinated beverages. For the record, I drink them from time to time when I am really tired, or when I get those Energy drinks (Rockstars, Red Bulls, etc) free at work, or when we accidentally buy them from the store not knowing they had caffeine. Sometimes I just plain feel like a Mountain Dew or something. I drink at least a couple dozen Caffeinated drinks a year I'm sure...so rest assurred this is NOT some mote in your eye, beam in my own eye type of blog.

Now that we have that out of the way, it is true that there is no officially ENFORCED Policy in the church on Caffeinated soda/pop beverages. If you drink Coke or Pepsi or whatever, it won't keep you from getting a temple recommend, or from taking the sacrament, nor will you suddenly stop having/feeling the spirit. You won't be disciplined by the church in any way.

Condemnation
Now just because something doesn't stop you from getting a temple recommend doesn't mean it's good for you either. It all boils down to "Condemnation", which doesn't mean the same thing as "Damnation". Damnation means your progression is STOPPED. Condemnation means that though you won't "LOSE" the spirit, you may not progress AS FAST as you COULD had you been a bit more faithful. As an extreme example, President Kimball got distracted by a little bird chirping during a sacrament meeting once, and felt so horrible that he had to repent! How many of us would feel utterly sinful for being distracted for a second during a meeting? Of course he was trying to live to a higher standard than most of us, but that's the point. That's probably part of our punishment on the other side of the veil, seeing the blessings we COULD have enjoyed had we been a bit more faithful. While drinking caffeine or even watching certain R-rated movies won't keep you out of the Temple or Celestial Kingdom, they may SLOW your progression. It's similar to President Kimball...if you want to be on a higher level then work at it and live a higher standard, but otherwise you won't go to hell for it, and you won't entirely lose the spirit like popular mormon myth claims. According to President Benson and the D&C, every one of us is ALWAYS under some form of condemnation (not progressing as fast as we have potential to).

Chocolate
Some people try to make all sorts of justifications to explain (aka JUSTIFY) why drinking caffeinated Soda is ok, but Coffee is still bad. We've all heard the arguments that Caffeine couldn't possibly be bad because then we'd have to outlaw chocolate too. Actually, that's not true. It's true that Chocolate does have theobromine (xantheose) in it, which is similar to Caffeine in that they are both xanthines, but they are very different from each other:

Here's some differences between the two if you really care to know:

Theobromine:
gentle
mild effect
very slow onset
long lasting
50% in bloodstream after 6 to 10 hrs
increases feeling of well being
mild antidepressant
gentle, smooth, sensual stimulation
stimulates cardiovascular system
stimulates muscular system
mild effect on central nervous system
almost no one is allergic
not addictive
no withdrawal symptoms
mild diuretic
stimulates the the kidneys


CAFFEINE:
intense
strong effect
fast acting
rapid dissipation
50% in bloodstream after 2 to 5 hrs
increases alertness
increases emotional stress
jagged, nervous stimulation
stimulates cardiovascular system
stimulates respiratory system
strong effect on central nervous system
many people allergic
physically addictive
many proven withdrawal symptoms
extreme diuretic
requires large intake of fluids to balance the diuretic effect



Most people mistake the two because they're both xanthines. It's also possible to find trace amounts of caffeine in the hulls of the Cacao seeds but they're discarded before processing. MOST OF THE TIME that you read about caffeine in chocolate it's an ignorant over sight because it's not native to chocolate, Theobromine is. So no...outlawing Caffeine would not outlaw chocolate, but it was a nice attempt at justification anyway. :)

Then you see people making claims about how no prophet or church leader has ever specifically said we shouldn't drink Caffeine. This too, is not correct. For those of you blindly in denial, here are your references (keep in mind I am not judging, as I admit to drinking caffeine myself...I just want people to quit being in denial):


On Cola drinks
"I say to the Latter-day Saints, and it is my right to say it (he then says because you have sung and quotes from 'We Thank Thee, O God, For a Prophet). Now, if you mean it--I am not going to give any command, but I will ask it as a personal, individual favor to me, to let coca-cola alone. There are plenty of other things you can get at the soda fountains without drinking that which is injurious. The Lord does not want you to use any drug that creates an appetite for itself." Heber J. Grant

"I have the statement on the examination of a capable chemist that cola drinks contain caffeine, the element that is so prevalent in coffee and other stimulants. There is one thing that I do know, however: this stimulating drink is not served in my home, and no matter where I am I personally avoid it." Joseph Fielding Smith

"Caffeine is a drug. It is classed as a narcotic. Constant use of caffeine, whether in coffee, tea or soft drinks, can have only a dangerous effect upon the human system.
"Studies even now are showing that coffee may be attacked as vigorously as tobacco now is when the scientists studying it assemble all their data." Church News editorial, April 25, 1970, p.16.

the leaders of the Church have advised, and we do now specifically advise, against the use of any drink containing harmful habit-forming drugs under circumstances that would result in acquiring the habit. Any beverage that contains ingredients harmful to the body should be avoided.'" (Clifford J. Stratton, "Caffeine—The Subtle Addiction, " Ensign, June 1988, 60; Priesthood Bulletin, Feb. 1972)

In 1996 President Hinkley had the following conversation with Mike Wallace on 60 minutes:
Wallace: Mormons adhere to a very strict health code. No alcohol, no tobacco, no coffee, no tea, not even caffeinated soft drinks?
Hinkley: Right.

Wallace: eat meat sparingly, exercise?
Hinkley: Right.
Wallace: get plenty of sleep.
Hinkley: Right. It's wonderful!

In a 1997 interview, David Ransom and President Hinkley had the following exchange:
Ransom: But you do condemn so many things that are commonly accepted. For example no sex before marriage. No tobacco, no alcohol, no gambling not even coffee.
Hinckley: Yeah that's right.
Ransom: And very, very strict.
Hinckley: That's wonderful. And you live longer. And you're happier. And you're healthier.
Ransom: What's wonderful about not drinking coffee?
Hinckley: Oh ah coffee has all kinds of caffeine in it.


Interview with Larry King Live:
Larry King: No to caffeine?
Gordon B. Hinckley: No to caffeine, coffee and tea.

"We have a Word of Wisdom that says if there's anything that's bad, we should avoid it. The Word of Wisdom doesn't mention arsenic, but we know to avoid that. We don't need to be commanded in all things." -Boyd K Packer

"Two of the tests we can employ as we question the use of any food or beverage are: Is it wholesome? Is it prudent? As we know, some of us need more rest than others. These same principles imply that we should not tax our bodies beyond good judgment. Finally, remember that the Lord has counseled:
'For behold, it is not meet that I should command in all things; for he that is compelled in all things, the same is a slothful and not a wise servant; wherefore he receiveth no reward.' (D&C 58:26)
"We know that cola drinks contain the drug caffeine. We know caffeine is not wholesome nor prudent for the use of our bodies. It is only sound judgment to conclude that cola drinks and any others that contain caffeine or other harmful ingredients should not be used." ("Q&A: Questions and Answers, " New Era, Oct. 1975, 34 NOTE: Scroll down to Bishop Peterson's question/answer section about cola drinks.)

Elder Sterling W. Sill, Conference Report, April 1965, General Priesthood Meeting, p.88
And one of the most damaging sins and one that gives greatest strength to our death instinct is the violation of that great revelation given 132 years ago called the Word of Wisdom. Some violators of this law tend to excuse themselves because it appears to be such a small thing. It seems like just a little disobedience, a little caffeine a little nicotine, a little friendly indulgence in alcohol. Yet these are the springboards to disease, broken homes, immorality, disloyalty to God, physical death, and the death of many of our eternal interests.

The pleasures of vice are mere illusions, tricks of the nervous system, and each time these tricks are played it is more and more difficult for the mind to tell the truth. Such deceptions come through drunkenness and narcoticism. In greater or less degree all nerve-affecting drugs produce it: nicotine, caffeine, opium, cocaine, and [all] the rest, strong or weak. Habitual use of any of these is a physical vice. A physical vice becomes a moral vice, and . . . to cultivate vice is o render our mind incapable of normal action. . . . One and all, these various drugs . . . tend to give the impression of a power or a pleasure . . . which we do not possess. . . . One and all their function is to force the nervous system to lie. One and all the result of their habitual use is to render the nervous system incapable of ever telling the truth. . . . Indulgence . . . destroys wisdom and virtue; it destroys faith and hope and love. . . . Whatever you do, count all the cost." (Elder Richard L. Evans, Conference Report, October 1969, Afternoon Meeting, p.66 - 67)

Elder John H. Taylor, Conference Report, October 1940, Afternoon Meeting, p.37
We have the same proposition in relation to the Word of Wisdom. We know the fundamental truth of the Word of Wisdom is based on a truth that cannot be eliminated or removed by any type of argument or reason. For instance, in coffee we have caffeine that is harmful, yet we sometimes reason that the same thing that makes coffee objectionable may not be so objectionable when it is used in some other way. It just indicates that we have not proven the thing so thoroughly that we have been able to hold fast to that which is good and make it a part of our lives.

Elder George F. Richards, Conference Report, October 1938, Afternoon Meeting, p.56
Some of our people quibble over the matter of tea and coffee, and say there is no mention of tea and coffee in the Word of Wisdom. I want to say to you that from the beginning of this Church, in the days of the Prophet Joseph, down to the present time, the leaders of this Church have interpreted that Word of Wisdom to include tea and coffee and all drinks that are habit-forming because of the caffeine and drugs they contain. We, as Latter-day Saints, who by our uplifted hands sustain the prophet in our day and time, President Grant, are under obligation to accept the interpretations that are made by him and by his predecessors [not to mention Gordon B. Hinckley and his interpretations that all Caffeine is bad) with respect to this matter.

President Rudger Clawson, Conference Report, October 1935, Third Day—Morning Meeting, p.107 - 108
And in respect to these things that are pronounced as being evil, he does not tell us in the revelation why there is evil in them, but time has determined this question. Scientific men have told us that in tobacco there is a deadly poison, and in tea there is a poison called tannin, in coffee a poison called caffeine. And we know that such must be the case, because these forbidden things are really and substantially narcotics, and a narcotic is something that is habit-forming. The things that are good for us are not habit-forming. We can take them up or put them down, but these badhabits very often and in most cases become masters of men; the habit is greater and stronger it appears than the individual.

Elder David A. Smith, Conference Report, April 1930, Afternoon Meeting, p.85
"Coffee and tea do more harm than good. Caffeine and tannic acid are the harmful agents in these beverages.

Howard W. Hunter, The Teachings of Howard W. Hunter, edited by Clyde J. Williams, p.105
Live the spirit of the Word of Wisdom. We complicate the simplicity of the Word of Wisdom. The Lord said don't drink tea, coffee, or use tobacco or liquor and that admonition is simple. But we confuse it by asking if cola drinks are against the Word of Wisdom. The 89th Section of the Doctrine and Covenants doesn't say anything about cola drinks, but we ask questions that go beyond the simplicity of the lesson that has been taught. We know that caffeine is taken out of coffee and used as an ingredient of cola drinks. It seems to me that if we really want to live the spirit of the law we probably wouldn't partake of that which had been taken from what we were told not to drink.

Improvement Era 1939
Cola drinks contain the drug, caffeine. For that reason, every argument used against coffee and tea, and some other arguments, may be used against cola drinks, and all other beverages containing caffeine, even in small amounts. They are determined habit formers, and may lead to the coffee and tea habit. They injure human health.
The following cola drinks are specifically mentioned by the sources below listed, as containing caffeine: Braser, Bromo-Kola, Shero, Cleo-Cola, Coca-Cola, Dandy Cola, D. C. Cola, Double Cola, Dr. Pepper, LaVida Cola, Lime Cola concentrate, Par-T-Pak Cola, Pepsi-Cola, Royal Crown (R-C) Cola, Western Cola, Wynola. (By John a. Widtsoe)
Whatever the source of caffeine may be, the physiological action of the drug is the same. (1944 John a. Widtsoe)

While not causing paralysis or death, small regular doses of caffeine are a very big challenge to the body. For instance, caffeine causes stomach temperature to rise 10 to 15 degrees, makes the stomach more acidic, and years of over-acidity can lead to stomach ulcers. Caffeine causes the heart to beat faster, lungs to work harder, and the blood vessels leading to the brain to narrow, while increasing the body's metabolic rate. Studies show that caffeine consumption is related to increased bladder and stomach cancers, elevated blood pressure, aggravated diabetes, and damaged stomach lining. It's technically classified as a poison.


The point...I couldn't care less if you drink caffeinated beverages or not. I myself drink them sometimes too. I admit it. That's all I want...if you drink them, just admit it...WofW = World of Warcraft...er whoops, I mean Word of "WISDOM"...and as the Lord said, it's not necessary that we be commanded in all things. You can still get a temple recommend, you won't be damned or lose the spirit any differently than you do for letting a little bird or crying baby distract you in sacrament like happened to President Kimball...just quit using false justifications that no leader has ever talked about it because they have...don't try to claim chocolate has caffeine, because it doesn't. Point out President Grant saying it wasn't a commandment, just a personal favor/recommendation, pass me another Rockstar and just plain admit to drinking Caffeine because we like it. :) You'll hear no judgment from me personally...but if you STILL remain in denial after all these quotes, there is no hope for you.

Uh...bytheway, pass me a Rockstar even if you are still in denial...I use them at work on occasion when tired so I don't fall asleep on the phones ANYMORE! :)
Currently playing:
Battlefield 2142 (DVD-ROM)
Release date: 17 October, 2006