|
Wednesday, August 26, 2009
 |
I've decided on some rates for my future recording endeavors. I've been at this for about three years now seriously undercharging bands by choice. I will continue to undercharge for the quality of work I do, as well as continue not to charge by the hour but I now have some set amounts per service for anyone interested.
Per song:
tracking: $40 editing (instruments): $30 vocal editing: $20 drum sample replacement: $40 vocal tuning: $40 mixing: $60 mastering/CD sequencing: $10
This comes out to $240 per song if all services are used, as would likely be the case for a band wanting to layer a recording track by track for a "polished" or "produced" sound. If you simply want me to capture a live performance, then mix/master and sequence to a final CD, it would only be $110 per song. If recording tracks individually, the vocal and instrument editing charges take effect, but I will also perform comps/time shifting/pocketing/any other necessary editing for no additional charge. Talk to me about discounts for larger projects.. I am flexible and I want to help your band sound totally cool.
Thanks for your time and interest.
- William
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, April 08, 2009
 |
So the wandas kicked off our april tour thursday the 2nd and I promptly kicked off my hyped up blog I've been promising everyone today, april 8th. We've played a show every night but Monday since the 2nd. So far we've hit Hamden CT, Worcester, Boston, Washington DC and are playing the historic Lit Lounge in Manhattan tonight. I've already made an ass of myself multiple times... not sure what else to say besides that Keith farts a lot and my plan to not see any male genitalia for the next two weeks was spoiled in a Walmart bathroom.. quite surprisingly not by a band member, but by an employee who seemed to enjoy standing too far from the urinal while texting after he was clearly done relieving himself.
Photos later...
 | Currently listening: Greatest Hits By Journey Release date: 2006-08-01 |
|
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
 |
Here's a list of gear I own just in case anyone would like to know...
Custom built Q6600 audio computer/Macbook pro for mobile work M-Audio Profire 2626 digital interface/8-channel preamp A/D converter API A2D 2-channel mic preamp and A/D converter Presonus Digimax FS 8-channel preamp/converter
Pearlman TM-1 custom tube condenser microphone Sure SM 57 (x3) Electro Voice RE20 Audio Technica 4041 (x2) Audix i5 (x3) Cascade Fathead ribbon (x2) Audix D2 (x2) Audix D6 kick drum mic
Benchmark DAC-1 2 channel mastering D/A converter Adam A7 monitors with sub 8 subwoofer 1980's Radio Shack minimus "mix checkers"
a large amount of bass traps from GIK acoustics for a very accurate mixing/mastering environment.
Mixing/mastering plugins from Waves, massey, trillium lane labs and digidesign including the awesome waves SSL bundle.
All cabling is mogami gold with neutrik connectors.
This rig affords me 18 simultaneous channels of recording that's completely portable should the need arise. I can do entire album projects or something as simple as coming to your practice space and record/mix your practice for very low rates. I'm always adding to my gear so there may very well be some new toys not listed here.
Thanks for your time. Call me! (401-595-6928)
William
 | Currently listening: The Royal Scam By Steely Dan Release date: 1999-11-23 |
|
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
 |
I've been meaning to put a little information on here for a while about what I have to offer as a "recording engineer" or "producer", or "dickface", or whatever you'd like to call me. I'd like to do that now.
I consider myself to be a competent recorder/mixer. I spend pretty much all my free time trying to better myself at this art form as does any respected recording engineer you'll find, no matter how famous or how able to rest on their laurels they might be and I believe you shouldn't be paying any money to work with someone who isn't that way. I don't have mounds of gear to impress your eyes, but I've managed to accumulate a few very key high end pieces of gear along the way that I find to be indispensable and will surely give your ears what they are looking for.
In my opinion, the quality of a recording is determined by the following factors (in order of importance): the song, the performance, the engineer's skill at tracking, editing and mixing, the room and mics, then finally the rest of the gear. That said, there are a few things gear-wise that will greatly improve the quality and fidelity of a recording, namely high quality mics, preamps, converters and signal processing. These are all things I possess.
Recording with me is much more affordable than going to a dedicated facility because I have virtually no overhead and don't rely on recording income to pay the bills. I don't charge by the hour and I will never rush you. My goal is for you to be elated at the quality of your recording and I will do whatever it takes to make you feel that way. I run Pro Tools software which gives me compatibility with virtually every professional facility in the world which means if you have the need to do the initial tracking in another studio, or take your session elsewhere for a specific reason (like a great drum room, or access to lots of exotic instruments or something) you can, and then you can bring it right back to me. Or, if you want to have your material mixed and/or mastered elsewhere, you can do that too. I can also take your prerecorded material and edit and mix it for you if you have that need.
So give me a call (401-595-6928) or email me and we can discuss what I can do for your musical aspirations. If you'd like to read my blog about the current state of the recording industry, it's on my myspace page as well.
Thanks for your time and remember, it's who records you, not what or where that really matters!
William
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, August 13, 2008
 |
Current mood:  focused
I've noticed in my experience being around the music scene around here that there's different types of bands and artists with differing opinions, goals and beliefs about what the recording process is and how it should be approached. They can be roughly broken down in to two categories: The local band with day jobs, and the signed, working band with a record contract.
The first group is generally very naive to the recording process. These are the people I work with because I don't have a real commercial facility and a large list of notable clients. I also fall in to the first group respectively at what I do because I also work a day job and I'm not a full blown professional. I'm on the same relative level of my craft as they are at theirs. It should be noted though, that just because someone isn't technically "professional" (doing it for a living) doesn't mean they aren't great at what they do. How many bands on the radio do you absolutely hate? I'd bet there's a lot of local bands you'd much rather listen to.
There's a lot of "semi-pro" or "project studios" in existence right now and I'll try to give you a little bit of background information on why that is...
Years ago, recording equipment was virtually all of the industrial nature. By that, I mean it was either consumer grade bought at a department store for people to have fun with or heavy, expensive higher voltage gear intended for professional use only with very little in between. The gear was sold by brokers to recording studios at industrial price points and the studio would mortgage it then pay it off with the money they made as a business. This scenario still exists but is becoming more and more rare as the rise of affordable recording equipment continues to lower and lower the cost of a "studio" and more and more people are either recording themselves or going somewhere cheap. The lines have been blurred as to what is and isn't a recording studio and a lot of the really beautiful Neve and SSL facilities out there simply aren't getting the business they once did and are forced to close down. Legendary studios with long histories attached to them are dropping like flies. It's sad but true..
To give a rough estimate of the cost of yesterday's professional gear compared to todays "prosumer" equipment, in 1985 an SSL console, two studer 24 track tape decks a 2" mix down deck, racks of outboard compressors/eqs and reverbs and a professional mic locker would likely cost a studio $1,000,000. This isn't even taking into account the cost to acoustically design the rooms and maintenance costs for the console (something like $10,000 a year) as well as the outrageous electricity bills.
Today, someone can buy a digidesign 003 interface, some kind of 8 channel preamp, a few rode or audio technica condenser mics, some SM57s, and an imac for $5,000 and call it a recording studio. Where years ago there would likely only be 2-3 studios in a 100 mile radius, now there's a few per town.
This is where most of the misconceptions begin to arise.There's a ton of low budget studios out there operated by people who simply don't have what it takes to make a good sounding record. These people are generally musicians themselves who bought their equipment with the intention of recording themselves and realized they could advertise themselves as a "recording studio". What most of these so called "engineers" lack is a true respect and devotion to the art of recording music. They don't have the attention to detail and patience, knowledge of the gear and room acoustics a real professional posses and the end product reflects that. Some telltale signs of this are noticeable mistakes in the performances (a good producer/engineer makes sure only your best playing goes on the record), out-of-balance mixes, overall "cheap" sounds and other flaws that pop up the second you hit play. If you feel there is something obviously wrong with your recording then whomever recorded you has failed and it's pretty common now. It seems like just about every band I know has a demo they paid someone to butcher. Just as the lines have been blurred as to what a studio is and isn't, the line between "guy with some recording stuff" and "engineer" has been blurred too... especially by the self proclamation of these supposed "engineers".
There is now a huge variance in the quality of the recording engineers you will encounter where once the title actually meant something.
It's become the standard cliche these days that "the engineer determines the quality of the recording, not the gear." and rightly so because it's now truer than ever. There used to be a guarantee that the person you were recording with busted their ass to get where they were. You knew this person spent years assisting a seasoned professional and worked for free just so that they could accumulate knowledge, learn how to treat clients and occasionally sit in and watch. You knew that other engineers likely failed and gave up where yours succeeded and that was why he/she was sitting behind the board. It should be known that a good recording engineer can make a more "expensive" sounding record with a few SM57s an MBox and a laptop than a shitty one can make in a 2 million dollar facility (assuming they can even figure out how to use it). If that sounds like an exaggeration I assure you I'm not kidding.
This is why now more than ever bands need to really find out who they're working with and not necessarily so much where. Find out what they've done and listen to the recordings yourself. All the big shiny stacks of gear in the world won't get you the sound you're after unless the geek pushing the buttons understands what you want and knows how to do it for you. There's gonna be guys out there that don't care about your band and just want to make a quick buck, then there's gonna be guys that can get you the sound you want in their basement, and I'd like to think I'm one of them.
Thanks for reading.
William
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|