MySpace


PHACE



Last Updated: 8/14/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 28
Sign: Virgo

City: PHILADELPHIA
State: Pennsylvania
Country: US
Signup Date: 5/5/2008

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Monday, March 09, 2009 
Thursday, November 13, 2008 

Current mood:  angry
Category: Blogging


http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/articles/17910/c...

This article is entitled "The New FACES of HIV". I encourage everyone one to read it, especially are grandmothers and great aunts.....

Monday, October 27, 2008 

Current mood:  determined

"No difficult or simple job ever gets done until someone decides right now to do what it takes to get the job done. Unfortunately, too many people stand by ready to carry the stool when there is a piano to be moved."

                                                   ---President Hoover

As many of us have just finished AIDS Walks in our cities and towns, some of us are tired and ready to sit down. Resting is fine, but please don't rest too long.

World AIDS Day is fast approaching and we have to get in gear. Why? Because those of us on the frontlines know that one day to create awareness is not enough.

I'm not sure what it is, but I have the strangest (or most awesome) feeling that this World AIDS Day is going to be huge! Having said that, now is not the time for us to rest on our laurels. Yes, we raised hundreds of dollars, sold hundreds of buttons, and walked many, many miles--but our daily walk is far from over.

As the quote above says, there are pianos to be moved and HIV/AIDS is the biggest of all the grand pianos you've ever seen!

So, the question is: Are you here to help move the piano or just to carry the stool?

Wednesday, October 22, 2008 

Current mood:  blank
Category: Life
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 

Current mood:  contemplative


http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/articles/17626/c...

This article features Philadelphia's own William Brawner, he is an activist who's has been positve for 10+ years...

Wednesday, September 03, 2008 

Current mood:  aggravated

Deadly inattention to HIV

A new infection every 10 minutes in the U.S. is not acceptable; it's time to renew the AIDS fight

Every 9 1/2 minutes, someone in the United States is infected with HIV. That's about 150 every day - more than 1,000 a week. This is part of the news from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recently unveiled HIV incidence statistics, and it has critical implications for the nation.

Previously, it was thought that there was an infection every 13 minutes. But the CDC's new tool for estimating HIV reveals that there are more than 15,000 more HIV infections annually than had been previously estimated. Roughly 200 of those 15,000 people will die each year because of HIV disease. The number of new infections among gay and bisexual men of all races is on the rise, and the disproportionate impact in racial and ethnic minority communities is staggering.

Do the new statistics mean that HIV prevention services are failing? To the contrary, incidence - the number of people newly infected in a given year - has been stable for several years, while prevalence - the total number of people with HIV - has grown. This means that the HIV transmission rate from people living with HIV to HIV-negative partners is decreasing. Further, the transmission rate is declining even while the CDC's HIV prevention budget has shrunk by 19.3 percent (adjusted for inflation) since fiscal year 2002. Carefully conducted scientific studies have demonstrated that HIV prevention services (such as counseling by influential peers) can alter HIV-related risk behaviors and help stem the spread of the disease.

The new HIV incidence statistics do, however, indicate that the U.S. has much work to do. The fact is, we have the tools to drastically reduce the number of new HIV cases, but as a nation we have chosen not to do so. We believe that there are seven things the U.S. can do now to get smarter and better at fighting the epidemic:

First, we must reject the CDC's anemic plan to reduce new infections by 10 percent by 2010 and replace it with aggressive, measurable goals to reduce new infections by 50 percent in five years.

Second, to achieve such bold goals, we must scale up HIV prevention services in the U.S. to an annual investment of $1.3 billion - a funding level that would address the erosion of HIV prevention and core surveillance funding since 2002, and would expand the reach of prevention services across the nation.

Third, as part of this investment, the CDC should fund additional states - not just the 22 states whose data were used in the new incidence study - to utilize the new testing technology that enables better HIV incidence estimates and allows the creation of a locally useful dashboard by which to manage the local epidemic. Sadly, Maryland is one of nine jurisdictions that the CDC has stopped funding for incidence surveillance, and the state has suffered a 40 percent loss in overall federal dollars to monitor the epidemic. Ultimately, this loss could result in a decrease in federal funds for HIV treatment, since the allocation of these resources is based on reported cases of HIV and AIDS.

Fourth, even though gay and bisexual men of all races account for more than 50 percent of new HIV infections in the U.S., the CDC allocates a substantially smaller percentage of its budget to programs serving this community. This must be immediately remedied.

Fifth, as the CDC's HIV prevention budget has shrunk, so too has funding for a special, cross-agency federal program to address HIV/AIDS in minority communities (the Minority AIDS Initiative). This funding trend must be reversed. Further, governmental and nongovernmental organizations must address the root causes of HIV/AIDS disparities, including racism, sexism, homophobia and income inequality.

Sixth, we must see information, discussions and stories about HIV return in great numbers to the news pages, television shows, kitchen tables and classrooms of the U.S. Our national foundation of basic facts about HIV is crumbling, according to national surveys.

Seventh, while HIV testing is critical, we must not mistake the CDC's heavy emphasis on "opt-out" HIV testing in health care settings for a truly comprehensive national HIV prevention program, including needle exchange services, behavioral interventions, adequate HIV housing, comprehensive sexuality education and other evidence-based services.

We are pleased that Congress will hold a hearing in September on the implications of the new HIV statistics, but the next president must go further and once again make HIV in the U.S. a priority. Perhaps the U.S. is waiting for a cure, or a perfect vaccine. But the cost of waiting is a new HIV infection every 9.5 minutes.

This national path of apathy is not only ill-advised and expensive but also unethical and a public health error of the greatest magnitude.

David R. Holtgrave is chairman of the Department of Health, Behavior and Society at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Julie M. Scofield is executive director of the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors, Washington.

Thursday, August 28, 2008 
..TR> ..TABLE>

'What use is one condom?'

Women are the key to battling the HIV/Aids pandemic, and improving their rights is one of the most effective ways of tackling the disease, charities such as ActionAid say. Here, to mark World Aids Day on Saturday, Lihle Dlamini, a South African who is HIV positive, explains why it is so important that women speak up.

Lihle became infected in her early twenties during a relationship with a boyfriend who had many partners. He told her that he used condoms with the other women he slept with, but that he didn't want contraception to get in the way of the relationship he had with Lihle. "He told me I was safe," says Lihle, "and while I didn't trust him I didn't feel in the position to tell him what to do. That was the mistake."

It was several years later before the virus began to take hold. Lihle lost over a third of her bodyweight, and felt sick all the time. She decided it was time to be tested. "When I found out I was HIV positive, it was actually a relief," she says. "At least I knew what I was dealing with, why I was sick." And it was then Lihle decided that action was needed if other young women were not to find themselves in exactly the same position. A campaigner was born.

Tell the truth

Six million of South Africa's 40m people are infected with HIV. Among some groups the rates are higher than the national average: some 30% of pregnant women presenting at antenatal clinics are infected, rising to nearly 50% in some regions. At the same time, sexual violence against women is rife: South Africa has one of the highest levels of reported rape. For those who do contract the disease, treatment is far from guaranteed.

President Thabo Mbeki, who has cast doubt both about the link between the HIV virus and Aids and the extent to which the disease has spread in his country, has now granted access to anti-retroviral drugs, but the majority of patients do not receive them. "What we really need is our political leaders to stand up and tell the truth about what is happening," says Lihle.

"We need role models who'll tell us whether they themselves are HIV positive or not, who'll say 'you must respect women, you must use condoms'. It's not happening at the moment."

So Lihle is taking the message herself. Women, she says must feel empowered to say no or demand their partner use a condom. "The key thing is economic independence. Women need to take responsiblility for themselves. Too many are in relationships where they are dependent upon the man, and feel they have to do as he says."

"Female condoms must be more widely available so women can take contraception into their own hands and not just rely on the man," she says. "At the moment you go to the clinic, they give you one. Well how much use is that? People don't just have sex once." "The bottom line is: you change women's status, you change the number of people getting HIV."

Slowly, slowly

Lihle says support is slowly growing for her campaign, from women, but also, increasingly from men too. "There are men who want to change things, but it is very hard in a culture where attitudes are so ingrained." Lihle campaigns with her husband, who is not infected.

"It is good he joins me because men feel they can approach him when they might not always approach me. He sits down with young men, older men, he talks about condoms, about why it's not right to beat your wife." The two are hoping to start a family before long, and are currently being advised on the best way to proceed. "We have a very full life together. HIV has not robbed me of that."

Powered by
Google Translate
English
Albanian
Arabic
Bulgarian
Catalan
Chinese
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese
Norwegian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Wednesday, August 27, 2008 

One(R) Condoms Challenges Presidential Candidates to Get in Bed with Condoms



2008-08-12 23:47:02 -

www.onecondoms.com - For One Condoms Michelle Fournier, 617-946-2800 ext 26 michelle@globalprotection.com In response to a recent report by the Centers for Disease Control regarding a sharp increase in HIV infection rates in the United States, One(R) Condoms has issued a bold challenge to Presidential candidates Barack Obama and John McCain.

On Thursday, August 14, campaign headquarters for each candidate will receive 56,300 condoms, one for each person estimated by the CDC to become infected with HIV/AIDS this year. In personalized letters to Senators Obama and McCain, the candidates are encouraged to donate the condoms to nonprofits or health centers in the U.S. The candidates are also asked to include support for comprehensive education programs into their campaign platforms.

"The current administration's policies regarding sexual health education have fractured efforts to provide a cohesive, structured and successful HIV/AIDS prevention program. Promoting abstinence at the expense of condom use has forced many state governments and non-profit organizations to go it alone when it comes to combating sexually-transmitted diseases," says One(R) Condoms spokesperson Jared Fennelly. "America needs a leader who will bring all parties to the table and put forth a plan to create a national dialog regarding HIV/AIDS. We want to hear from both candidates whether condoms will have a fair place in that discussion."

Barack Obama announced his candidacy on February 2, 2007 - based on CDC projections, 84,200 Americans since that date have been infected with HIV/AIDS. John McCain announced his candidacy on March 1, 2007 and since that time an estimated 81,289 new transmissions of HIV/AIDS have occurred.

Since the CDC report, both candidates have released statements regarding the fight against HIV/AIDS, though neither specifically mentioned condoms or condom education.

"In 1987, C. Everett Koop stated that 'a condom can save your life.' Politics and policies may change, but that reality hasn't. Comprehensive education, which includes accurate information about consistent and correct condom use, is essential to preventing the spread of HIV/AIDS," says Fennelly.

Thursday, August 07, 2008 

WASHINGTON, DC - State and territorial AIDS directors demand that the United States (U.S.) government dramatically scale up efforts to end the domestic HIV/AIDS epidemic. Using new technologies to estimate HIV incidence, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) now estimates that 56,300 new infections occurred in the U.S. in 2006, a number significantly higher than the previous estimate of 40,000 - a less precise count that had remained static for over a decade. "The release of these data serves as the clarion call that America's response to the HIV/AIDS epidemic must be brought to scale," stated Julie Scofield, Executive Director of the National Alliance of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD).

CDC's revised incidence estimate provides definitive evidence that HIV prevention has not been adequately funded to decrease the number of new HIV infections occurring each year. HIV prevention funding represents only four percent of the domestic federal HIV/AIDS budget. In comparison, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) dedicates 22 percent of global funding to prevention. Rather than investing in domestic HIV prevention, the U.S. government has cut funding to state and local health departments by more than $28 million since FY2003. When adjusted for inflation, experts estimate the CDC's domestic HIV prevention budget decreased over 19 percent since FY2002.

Experts have demonstrated the relationship between federal funding and HIV prevention program effectiveness. In fact, CDC estimates there was a remarkable decline from a high of approximately 130,000 annual HIV infections in the late 1980s to a low of close to 50,000 in the early 1990s. During this time, CDC's prevention budget increased by almost fifty percent. The new data also reveal that the number of new infections increased in the late 1990s to between 55,000 and 58,500 per year and has remained relatively stable at this level since 2000, a time when prevention funding began eroding. Because of this, along with restrictive ideological policies challenging targeted prevention messages for gay men, banning the use of federal funds for needle exchange programs, and wasting millions of dollars on failed abstinence-only programs, HIV prevention programs have been thwarted in their ability to equip those at risk with the tools and information they need to remain uninfected. Only through their perseverance to serve the populations they are mandated to protect have health departments and community partners navigated these unacceptable hurdles.

The new estimation technology also provides more accurate estimates of new infections among specific populations, confirming what many health departments have recognized for years: the HIV/AIDS epidemic continues to disproportionately impact gay and bisexual men of all races and ethnicities and African American men and women. It is now estimated that in 2006, men who have sex with men (MSM) accounted for 53 percent of new infections. Infection rates among blacks were seven times greater than whites and nearly three times higher than Hispanics, a group that also was disproportionately affected.

The new estimates also underscore America's pervasive indifference toward racism, homophobia, poverty and sexism. The continuing apathy about these root causes of health disparities continues to impede efforts to meet the needs of those most at risk for being infected with HIV. To this end, confronting oppression and stigma must be at the foundation of a scaled up strategy to end the HIV/AIDS epidemic in America.

"For years, prevention efforts serving gay men have been stifled by idealogues," remarked Julie Scofield, NASTAD's Executive Director. "It is clear that the nation's HIV prevention efforts must be delivered in a manner that respects the real life experiences of gay and bisexual men and African Americans, all who unacceptably bear the greatest burden of HIV disease. Woefully inadequate funding and personal biases have created the perfect storm, leaving thousands of gay men and African Americans to pay the ultimate price. Until the nation recognizes the connection between oppression and health, we will never be successful in our work to end this dreadful disease among all Americans," Scofield continued.

In December of 2007, NASTAD released a road map for ending the epidemic in the U.S., The Blueprint: Ending the HIV/AIDS Epidemic through the Power of Prevention. This document and its accompanying policy agenda detail the steps that must be taken in order to turn the tide on HIV/AIDS in America. The Blueprint challenges the nation to lift its veil of indifference and commit to ending the epidemic through the power of prevention. Chief among the recommendations is a call for an increase of at least $600 million for CDC's core HIV prevention program to bring the historically underfunded program to scale.

"We know prevention works when it's available," stated Scofield. "Rates of infection among persons who use injection drugs have plummeted when appropriate services are made available. The same is true for babies born to HIV-infected mothers. We must take every opportunity to ensure every American has access to tools and services that prevent infection. Prevention has not failed; we have failed to capitalize on the potential of prevention," remarked Scofield.

NASTAD is a nonprofit national association of state health department HIV/AIDS program directors who have responsibility for administering HIV/AIDS and viral hepatitis health care, prevention, education, and supportive services programs funded by state and federal governments. NASTAD's vision is a world free of HIV/AIDS. For more information, visit www.NASTAD.org.

--


NASTAD
444 N. Capitol Street, NW, Suite 339
Washington, DC 20001
Phone: 202-434-8090 Fax: 202-434-8092
www.NASTAD.org

"Bridging Science, Policy, and Public Health"
Powered by
Google Translate
English
Albanian
Arabic
Bulgarian
Catalan
Chinese
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
Estonian
Filipino
Finnish
French
Galician
German
Greek
Hebrew
Hindi
Hungarian
Indonesian
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese
Norwegian
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Russian
Serbian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish
Thai
Turkish
Ukrainian
Vietnamese
Thursday, August 07, 2008 

Current mood:  confident

SEN. BARACK OBAMA and his wife Michelle were both tested years ago.

So were Pennsylvania State Sen. Vincent Hughes and his wife of almost three years, the actress Sheryl Lee Ralph, as were Susan Taylor, former editor of Essence and her husband of 19 years, Khephra Burns. And come tomorrow, on National HIV Testing Day, other Philadelphia couples are being encouraged to take the test together.

Yeah, that's right, couples. The hope is that by having committed, monogamous, married folks step forward publicly for HIV testing, it will destigmatize the process and also encourage those involved in riskier sexual practices to learn their status as well. The new campaign, called "Get Tested Together," launches at 11 a.m. tomorrow at Love Park, 16th Street and JFK Boulevard.

"It sends a strong and powerful message to other members of your family and your community," said Hughes, who, with his wife, came up with the idea for the campaign's focus.

Among those planning to attend the Love Park event is the Rev. Alyn E. Waller of Enon Tabernacle Baptist Church, who, with his wife, Ellyn Jo Waller, was tested during an event at his church's new HIV/AIDS ministry. When it comes to HIV/AIDS, many churches have been dismally slow about encouraging their members to get tested, partly because of traditional religious teachings about premarital and extramarital sex as well as about homosexuality. To his credit, Waller refuses to get bogged down in all that.

"My position is, 'Know your status,' " Waller said when I checked in with him earlier this week. "Every person from the age of 13 to 64 needs to know their status. If you are a responsible Christian, you ought to be registered to vote. You should know your blood pressure, your PSA number [a prostate cancer indicator] and your HIV status.

"I've got a driver's license. I know my PSA number. I'm registered to vote and I know my status. Whatever it is, know it. There's light at the end of the tunnel for whatever the status is."

Organizers for Test Together, meanwhile, are prepared for the inevitable pushback as well as questions from folks skeptical about why a monogamous couple needs to be tested for HIV, or about what undergoing such a test indicates about the state of their relationship. For the record, a person can be infected with HIV, the virus that can cause AIDS, for years and not be aware of it. It's assumed that a quarter of all of those infected aren't aware of it and are at risk of infecting their sex partners. Given the availability of testing-places these days, that's downright irresponsible and reckless, if you ask me.

"Vincent and I have been in love and together for five years. . . . We're fine with each other. I've been getting tested for years and years," said Ralph, a long-time AIDs activist who stars in a one-woman play on the subject of HIV called "Sometimes I Cry."

"I'm like, 'We know. We got tested. Don't you want to know?' I think they just don't want to really know," she added. "I have never known of one thing that so many people are involved with that they don't want to talk about and that is sex. . . . Are people just being crazy? Do they just want to keep the lid on the freak in them?

"There's some dialogue that's missing," Ralph added.

Still, the message is getting out there. Intake workers at Bebashi, the nonprofit on Spring Garden - its acronym stands for Blacks Educating Blacks About Sexual Health Issues - have noticed an uptick in recent years in the number of men and women who arrive together for testing. It's not unusual for employees to see one, perhaps two couples every week. Several years ago, that practically never happened. They're now seeing test takers who arrive with one partner, and return later with another.

Most are relieved to find out that they test negatively - but not always. Earlier this year, a husband who had been unfaithful got tested and then sent his wife to Bebashi after discovering he was HIV positive.

"They are middle class, educated," recalled Gary J. Bell, Bebashi's executive director who counseled the couple afterwards. "I remember she said to me that this was something that they'd never thought they'd have to deal with. They were sort of average. They'd been married, like, 10 years. Youngish. Employed. Just a very average looking black couple."

Although African-Americans make up just about 12 percent of the population, they account for more than half of the new HIV/AIDS cases. A disproportionate number of those new cases are black women.

Earlier this year, a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention revealed that one in four girls between the ages of 14 and 19 has a sexually transmitted disease, which increases their risk of contracting the AIDS virus. African-American girls were the most affected, with nearly half having already contracted an STD, according to the report.

Knowing both your status as well as your partner's is a first step toward practicing safer sex. But navigating that dicey topic is a whole other issue, particularly for single people who may not be ready to settle down or for those in abusive relationships. It opens up the whole issue of trust and fidelity as well as accountability.

"It's easier when it's early in a relationship, when they're both sort of feeling each other out," Bell said. "It's beginning a dialogue with couples. They are having a conversation about this. Part of this issue seems to have played out with a woman trying to confront a man and a man saying, 'What do you think I am? Do you think I'm gay?'

"It's tricky," Bell said. "It can be awkward. We are a society that still struggles with conversations about sex."

Yeah, but it's all about having enough self esteem to protect your body from being infected and caring enough for another person to not risk his health as well. Getting tested together is a good first step toward saying "I care." If you think about it, it demonstrates way more than a bouquet of flowers and a dinner out. What says commitment more than going together to make sure you are being as safe as possible?

"I'm not naive enough to think this is the answer," Bell said about the Test Together Campaign. "But we have to keep hammering away at the issue. You have to try different things. You have to be creative and continue to come up with other ideas. We can't afford to lose." *

Test Together, Love Park, 16th and JFK, 11 a.m. tomorrow, www.testtogether.org.