MySpace

email to a friend

Subscribe via myspace!!

Subscribe by email


Carrot Wax



Last Updated: 12/31/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 37
Sign: Cancer

City: Vancouver
State: British Columbia
Country: CA
Signup Date: 11/22/2005

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Tuesday, October 09, 2007 

Current mood:  loved
Category: Religion and Philosophy
Love is always a journey towards oneness, toward unity.  Because the use of the word Love is so pervasive in Hollywood, psychology and everyday use, it is used in many cases in contexts which does not imply this.  For instance, here is one phrase which has entered into the standard cultural catch phrases:
You cannot love another more than you love yourself.
While true, this implies of course there is a distinction between loving yourself and loving another.  There is no difference.  Loving yourself is loving another, and loving another is loving yourself.  To perceive otherwise would be to enforce separation where there in actuality is none.   There is a vast web of interconnection between everyone and everything on this planet, and what affects one spins out to affect us all.   Every action you take, whether it is to yourself or others, creates ripples throughout yourself, your friends, your community, and the world.   Looking deeply at the vast power and scope of this interconnectedness, the ultimate truth is simply that you are the world.   Loving yourself is loving the world, and loving the world is loving yourself.

This may seem idealistic and ungrounded to some.  To help the explanation so you understand this interconnection in a more practical way, let's look at a relationship pattern that has been very common in this culture, with manifestations in both genders:
A man decides he is in love with a woman and wants to build a future together.   Wanting to demonstrate this, he showers her with gifts and wants to spend every waking moment outside of work with her.   He makes her wishes ultra-important and always makes sure to do whatever it is she wants, putting aside his own desires.   He has decided love is to be expressed through sacrifice.   To pay the extra bills, he keeps at a job he doesn't like much, and gives up dreams he has of alternate careers.  While this feels very flattering at first, after some time the woman feels this sacrifice like a weight on her shoulders.   He has given up large aspects of himself, which cannot help but create both a void in him that he hopes to fill via the woman and unspoken expectations that influence all interactions in the relationship.   After a time this accumulates into frustrations and arguments.   He has disconnected aspects of himself and assumed this is an action based in love.   In essence, he has tried to find Love through not loving himself, and then discovers the expression of this lack of unity from the voice of his partner.
Showing the other side of the spectrum, many "selfless" people initiate all of their actions from a very "selfish" perspective - albeit with a grander awareness that encompasses this interconnection.   Gandhi once spoke that he was the most selfish being on the planet.  He performed every single action solely for himself.      He thus did not get tired of living his "selfless" life, because it was a continual reinforcement based in love of Self.

 If you recall moments of love between you and someone else, even experiences with a pet, these are moments where truly their needs and desires meld and coexist with your own as equal partners.  The other's desires becomes your own.   There is oneness and unity.   There is no sacrifice of your own desires in this state, for your desires are as important to the other as their own, and vice versa.   Experiences in this state are often called "higher", where time stands still, colors seem brighter and a grand feeling of aliveness pervades every moment.      However it is not truly "higher", but simply underlying every moment, waiting for you to knock.

Love in hand


To help with this experience, here is an exercise:
Sit across from a partner and breathe calmly and deeply together as you look into each other's eyes.   Imagine yourself in a vast plain of grass and forests drenched in comforting sunlight, with all the space around you that you can possibly imagine.  Now bring every aspect of yourself to this place.      This includes all of your desires, your dreams, your frustrations, and even your defenses.   Let them take up all the room they could ever need without any expectation of change.  Your partner can do the same in their own mind.  Breathe deeply for a minute until this feels like a completely natural self-perpetuating state.

Now bring your partner into this place, which includes inviting all aspects of them into your space.  Invite their desires, their dreams, their frustrations, and yes, even their defenses.  Give them as much space as they could ever need.  Now allow both of you to interact in this space without trying to do anything.   Let your desires interact with theirs without conflict.  Even your defenses can interact.   Give it time and space.

With complete permission there is an encompassing transformation that occurs naturally, without effort.  There is no sacrifice, only expansion that comes from allowing a greater world you're your own.   Because their desires are as important as your own, the interaction helps you understand your own desires more clearly, and even grow towards grander dreams.   Oneness helps you move towards clarity with your own identity, rather than making you give it up.

Note that this exercise can be done alone with the Self, for we all have conflicting aspects of ourselves that desire different things.   These have sometimes be called "subpersonalities", or separated aspects of Self that have different identities, albeit in milder forms than what is seen with true multiple personalities.   If you are alone, you can stare into a mirror and bring conflicting aspects of yourself together into this vast open field of sunlight in exactly the same way as described above.      Allowing all aspects of yourself to operate from a space of unity will of course create ripples in all the relationships in your life, inviting others to do the same.      Loving yourself is indeed loving the world.
Tuesday, October 02, 2007 

Category: Life
As you are probably noticing, there is a new header pointing to a new site.  Please check it out by clicking on the image!  Yes, I'm moving my writing outside of myspace, to reach a wider audience, and to provide momentum towards publishing.  I'll continue to post here as well, but that site will have extra things as well.  So any help anyone can give in this endeavor would be greatly appreciated.  This can be promotion, help in publishing, advice, putting a banner of the above on your own page, or something else weird and creative.  Thanks to all in advance!




On to emotions!

Emotions are somewhat of a problem for the vast majority of  people in this culture.  They can be very  pleasurable in the initial rush of love in relationships or in successes in  sports and the workplace, but for the most part "painful" or "messy" emotions  are thought of as something to avoid or fix.   Many, many people have gone to counseling because at the root they see  their emotions as a problem and thus think they have issues to resolve.

I personally love emotions.   I love them for the huge gift of perceptions they bring, being a measure  of dynamics happening externally.  I love  them for the self-knowledge they bring.   But most of all I love them because inviting them in, fully, in their  totality, brings such a vivid sense of aliveness that is not possible without them.

Simply put, there are no 'problems' with any emotions.   The only problem is our own judgment, the  perception of separation that divides parts of ourselves into 'good' and  'bad'.  This categorization has a strong  influence in every experience of emotion.

I've written before about related topics, so for further  reference you can look at The Allowing of Pain   and Negativity and a table of emotions.

To look in detail at something, let's look on a basic personal characteristic that  is treated with suspicion and often repressed: the quality of aggression.  It is recognized, truthfully so, that  aggression can cause conflicts, crossing of boundaries, and a fundamental lack  of listening.  And yet this is only one  aspect of aggression, an aspect fundamentally based in the perception of  differences and separation.  Someone mired in this state views  others as unconnected to themselves, and therefore an enemy.  This is always accompanied by a deep division in the self, where there is some denial of huge swaths of one's being.  Although this   is all too common, it is actually not a natural state.     Looking into nature and its purity, it is easy to find examples which  are not based at all in separateness, but rather of following the natural way each creature is meant to be.   Spending time watching tigers  or black panthers in the wild gives a wonderful example of this.  Their aggression is a thing of beauty, and harmonious.

My totem animal!

 

Within people, when aggression is allowed to its full  fruition - without any perception of separateness - there is never any possibility  for war because there is no one "out there" to make war with.  Perhaps a better word for the state is  dynamism.  Dynamism is itself part of the spectrum of  aggression, a great expansion of energy which includes and brings others  together for a purpose.  It inspires and provides a  basis for positive change in the world.  Dynamism includes all the aspects of aggression mentioned above, but is not at all based in conflict, so the same energy that is used for conflict in one case is used for creation and beauty.  A wonderful example of this state is the spiritual teacher  Krishnamurthi.  There was a strong outward  force around him which was joyful to be around, much like watching a panther in the wild.

All emotions – and personal characteristics - have this  dichotomy.  When blocked and based in the  division of right and wrong, "me" and "not me", any emotion can create  conflict.  When fully allowed to the  degree where there is no control and no judgment, there is a transforming that  occurs to move us into the potential of the experience of that emotion.  This will always be a movement towards love  of self and others.  Allowing always  creates a space for this transformation and movement.  All too often, there is a desire to take  action to transform emotions into something 'better'.  At its roots this is a non-acceptance of  emotions as they are occurring in the present moment.  Any action based on non-acceptance is likely  to perpetuate that state.

Saying "we are complete and perfect just as we are" is not  an empty statement, nor is it based in a positivity that is about avoiding  focusing on "negative things" - though it has often been used for this  purpose.  It is a statement of fact.  As we learn greater experience of allowing,  we also gain more direct experience of this completeness.  And thus, joy begins to be a regular  occurrence.


email to a friend


Monday, September 24, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
These last two weeks I've been witness to a few rather emotional discussions. Which is not at all unusual for me. However, in these weeks I've also been seeing how much push there is to suppress emotion in them - even for discussions of an inherently emotional nature. This kind of reaction seems to be pervasive in our  culture.  As a society, we're  extremely uncomfortable with emotion, and this shows up in a lack of appreciation of simply allowing it. To take an example, say there's a conflict between two people you know and like. There are no "easy" solutions in such a situation.  Both of them usually have valid perspectives,  which are linked to their own emotions, who they are, and their own  boundaries.  It's easy to get alienated from such situations because there's no  "right" answer, no "good side", and it's easy to feel trapped between the opposing forces.  Aligning yourself with one  side usually generates more problems. Emotions, therefore, are something best to avoid. At least so many thoughts go.

If we look deeply at the mechanism of suppressing emotions, it's  easy to see why. Who we are, which includes emotions, is actually extremely flexible – we can do almost anything we want to ourselves. We can develop ourselves to be almost anything desired, but we can also push emotions,  memories, and thoughts away from sight and try to squish them into  nothingness.   Our training in this culture involving doing such  things almost from day one.   However – and this is the root of almost all "problems" – we cannot truly disconnect ourselves from  ourselves.  There is no way to cut off and discard any disliked portion of ourselves.  There is truly no escape from who we are. We can try to surgically  disconnect a painful emotion, and we get a reasonable facsimile of this  disconnection.  But it will not be a true disconnect. Any emotion we've  tried to shove away is always there, waiting to come back, and in fact pulling  on us in every moment.

For the visually minded, I liken this  process to a great white elastic band.   We can stuff part of ourselves in a box, bury it, and walk away, but  we'll have that "pull" from it. It will exert pressure on us in every single moment, bringing attention to it.   The farther we push it away, the more pull there will be.  This is why the elastic band image helps. This pull isn't a harsh "you must deal with it"  one, but rather a force of nature that simply wants us to be in wholeness,  bringing us back to our greater Self.   This elastic can be influenced by others, too – if someone else walks  through the area of the denied connection, what occurs is the elastic force snapping  back, similar to a real elastic band.   This is another description of what "triggering" is.

Now in almost everyone there is not just  one such pocket of emotion buried and abandoned, but multitudes.  Each one exerts this pull back.  Try to imagine how that would feel with real  elastic bands.  Because of the constant  pull in many conflicting directions, there's very little freedom to move in any  direction.  A little movement can be made, but even small can movements pull against hidden emotion which will then pull back, producing an  emotional reaction in response.  This can generates fear of any emotional movement at all. Most people are  quite literally trapped in a static place by buried emotions.  In such a place, life is filled with  emotional minefields and geysers waiting to erupt.  Words must be watched and controlled in every moment. Walls and wired fences mark off areas where unwanted emotions lie fallow.


Now imagine on top of this picture that you are  close with someone else, who also has a huge amount of buried emotions.  It would be very easy to get a reaction in that person  if you tried to move through any of their "elastic bands".  So in  most relationships, there is a general, unspoken agreement for both parties to act in  such a way that no one will be triggered.   The initial rush of being "in love" at the beginning is usually the time  such  agreements are formed.  It's quite  natural, of course; being triggered is not enjoyable to anyone, and it is  normal to demonstrate you're not going to trigger pain to someone you love.  However, this restricts motion even further. After some  time, there's often a realization of how emotionally static such a posture  is.  This is when relationship questioning happens.  It can either lead to greater freedom if both  sides are open to questioning or to the end of a relationship if one person  blames the other for opening up emotional cans of worms.  There was an unspoken agreement, after all!

These unspoken agreements are actually  pervasive in all aspects of our society.   Social groups often have a number of these.  To see this, try to imagine you showing the  raw spectrum of an intense emotion without filtering (and without blaming others) to a  group you're part of.  If you feel that  this would cause a lot of alienation, or you simply cannot even imagine it,  that is a sign of unspoken agreements.   In such cases, someone not acting in accord with these agreements are  the vast majority of the time thought of as "the problem".  To someone in a prison, those outside of it  can indeed be a problem!  Unfortunately,  the label of "the problem" sticks far too often to anyone with even a little self-doubt, encouraging further denial of  emotions. And thus the cycle continues

The road less travelled, of course, is  simply to not push away any emotion that occurs.  This applies to both emotions within and  emotions in others.  Without the network  of opposing forces described above, an incredible amount of freedom begins to  take root.  There are no longer any  self-created chains rooting you to a particular emotional landscape.  At first this is terrifying, but as the  infinite amount of choices now available are gotten used to, the dance of  freedom truly begins.

Of course, it takes a good deal of time to reincorporate denied  aspects of ourselves back into the fold.   Try to imagine trying to rush this process and having many of these  elastic forces snap back all at once!   It takes gentleness and patience. Nevertheless, each part of Self allowed back into a space of wholeness  always adds to your sense of freedom, and brings a greater strength for any  further challenges.  This is the path of  wholeness. When the freedom and joy of this is seen, then there is no need to even try for disconnections from Self. For we are complete, just as we are.


email to a friend

Wednesday, September 12, 2007 

Category: Life
Been out of town for a bit, and done some writing for the book, but here's something not straight from it!


Recently it's hit home just how pervasive black and white thinking is.  It's fairly intrinsic to the American culture, so attitudes like the following list can be accepted without a second thought, or reacted to instantly:

•    "You're either for me or against me"
•    "If you saying someone is wonderful, that's fine, but bringing up mistakes made is blaming and should be stopped."
•    "I'm through be controlled by my fear!  I won't listen to it any more!"
    
    The latter two are less obvious than the first one, so let's look at them.  In the bringing up of mistakes, there are an infinite number of ways this can be done.  It can certainly done out of blaming and desire to punish.  It can also be done out of a sincere desire to help others via gentle teaching, much like we naturally do with children.  It can be done simply as a desire to bring people together, for walking on tiptoes around issues in order to be "positive" usually drives a group apart in time.  It is sincerity and goodwill that brings people together, and there are myriad ways this can be expressed - sometimes in ways that may result initially in conflict.
   
    For the last example, there's an assumption that fear is simply an enemy to overcome, all in one step.  Of course, our fears are usually not as simple as being afraid of heights.  They pervade our entire perception.  The humor in this is that rarely does someone proclaim overcoming fear except when they are motivated by fear.  "I'm afraid of fear, so I'll make war on it!" might be that reasoning brought to light!
   
    Bringing up the concept of fear is of course intentional, because it is central to black and white thinking.  There's always a core of it in that thought process.  Within the desire to go to extremes, there is a universe avoided in the remaining spectrum of life, which clearly has infinitely more colors than just two.  Even in the spectrum of gray there can be a swirling of colors, so to speak, and a great beauty.  There's little beauty in a black and white world; it's a harsh world of enemies and allies in a constant battle.

   



    Everyone is affected by fear.  I too am affected by it on a daily basis.  And yet, by allowing myself to experience fears, without refusing them or trying to get them to end, I'm finding more and more there's a perfect completeness in that.  Fear helps me.  It's meant to bring awareness to threats, to pains, to issues needed to be resolved, and that's what it does if it's allowed to.  It's not necessarily pleasant, but there is a great feeling of aliveness when I fully invite and surrender to it.
   
    There is no one on Earth that has no lessons to learn, that never makes mistakes.  There is also no one who makes nothing but mistakes.  (Yes, that includes George Bush!)   We each have a limited perception, and acknowledging that is loving, because it allows the full totality of someone, warts and all.  It's wise to be aware of potentials, for there's always room for growths, but focusing entirely on them and not being present (and thus allowing) with the here and now is a form of cutoff and division. 
   
Though I rarely make reference to the Bible, one section I like (and usually find in a different interpretation than my own) is the part on Adam and Eve eating of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.  Most people overlook that description of the tree - the awareness of good and evil.  To me, that simply speaks that it is the splitting of our perception into "Good" and "Bad", "Black" and "White" that takes us away from "Eden".  Letting go of judgments and filters, and simply allowing whatever occurs without labels instantly brings us back to that state of primordial innocence.



email to a friend

Currently listening:
The Beauty Of Gray + 4 Live Tracks
By Live
Tuesday, August 28, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy

More material to be in the book "Loving Awareness".


In the self-help community, there is much emphasis on how you need to change your beliefs to change your life.  "Change your thoughts, change your life!" is a maxim of Wayne Dyer.   Beliefs are how we interpret the world - every one of our experiences is filtered through our beliefs.  This is why ten different people coming from different backgrounds can have fundamental differences of interpretation of the same event - the jury system in the courts gives regular examples of this!  So changing beliefs can indeed have a powerful impact on lives.  However, most people think of a belief simply as a pattern of thoughts, and it is far more than this.  So what are beliefs, if we look deeply at them?

 

In the western cultural framework, we tend to think everything is intellectual.  We're a society that usually values intellect above all.  So when we talk about "mind" we generally refer only to thoughts and leave the emotions and the body divorced from the equation.  Not so in many oriental traditions.  The word "mind" in those cultures encompasses all of the mental, emotional, and physical parts of ourselves.  From these perspectives, we are a fully integrated system, with every part of ourselves affecting any other.  When there is recognition of this, there is more possibility of transformative changes occurring within ourselves.  Thinking it is only our thoughts that affect us and denying the real effect the body and the emotions have upon our thoughts and each other can easily lead to mind games, with no changes resulting, and thinking that all that it is needed is more effort in doing the same thing that hasn't worked in the past. 

 

Now, on this expanded field of who we are, beliefs exists everywhere in who we are, even outside thoughts.  In a real way, they are analogous to habits – a pattern that repeats in how we process information .  I liken them to rivers across the continent that is the Self.  Over time, trenches and canals appear that are the result of the water flowing in a certain pattern.  There is then a tendency to continue on the same course (whether in thoughts, body movements, or emotions), but any of them can be changed with consistent effort.  If dams have been constructed, blocking the flow, there will be alternate ways things flows.  Many of these can cause more harm than good, of course, but our bodies are quite adaptable - within reason.  There's actually a lot of similarities between the "flows" of our emotions, thoughts, and body processes.  For instance, an emotional memory might cause someone to feel anger and disappointment when someone doesn't look them in the eye.  This "gut reaction" occurs without thought.  Similarly, a sound of a traffic accident might cause adrenaline in someone and they'd jump up to run outside, without thought or much emotion. 


Because we're a complete system, it's all interrelated.  For example, a man may have fixed thoughts about how a woman "should behave" in a relationship.  These thoughts may be a protective layer around a core pain in the body relating to abuse by a mother-figure in childhood; in this abuse there would be both emotional pain and body memories.  Now, trying to change the thought patterns of this man will likely run up against a brick wall because it's only addressing thoughts.  This wall of course, is perfect – the thoughts are self-protective, and there is definitely pain that needs protecting, for it isn't appropriate to bring up just anywhere or with anyone.  This isn't to say changing thoughts is pointless; it creates ripples which may create a domino effect in other parts of the system.  But thoughts aren't the master control of it all, especially when there's not much consciousness in them.  We're a great tapestry of interweaving energies we call thoughts, emotions, and matter, and we become more adaptable and powerful when we work with this whole, rather than a smaller part of ourselves.

 

So then how to do this work in this quagmire?  The answer - which will be familiar to regular readers - is via allowing.  We're not like machines that break and then require a mechanic to go in and fix. We're constantly healing and balancing simply by being who we are, in every moment of every day.  Most alternative healing recognizes this and tries to support the body's natural strength instead of imposing harsh chemicals, for example.  If everything's out on the table - and everything includes thoughts, emotions, and the body – it's quite a change provoking event in itself.  Anyone who's been a witness to a person being deeply vulnerable cannot help but be affected by the experience.  Once the full wholeness of self is brought forward, there is a space of creation in that present moment that literally enables new worlds to be created.  These are worlds forced on your body by ramming affirmations inwardly; this is a process of mutual creation, and thus, a process of Love.

 

To put this in action, here's an exercise I wrote:

 


Exercise


This exercise is about being big about whatever process is going on in the moment, in ways that encompass the physical, intellectual, and emotional aspects of ourselves.  To be precise about being big, here is my definition:

 

Being big is about bringing the full totality of who you are to the world.  It has nothing to do with being loud, or pushing others, or speaking inspired thoughts.  You can be big no matter what your experiences in the present moment are.

 

For instance, someone desperately angry might be very loud and attempt others to change.  They would feel small to others, because they are not showing vulnerability about where this emotion is coming from.  On the other hand, others might be feeling worthless, full of condemning thoughts and not feel like they deserve to take any space around them.  They might be very shy and quiet.  Bringing that forward, in its totality, without any apology or protective face, would be big.  They might tell others they need to express this, then crawl into a corner, crunch themselves into fetal position, and mumble the thoughts they are having.  So long as they bring the full totality of who they are – which includes the knowing that this is only an experience and not defining in any way - they are big.  They are showing they are bigger than their own experience.  This is vastness.

 

So the exercise is to be big.  Bring whatever it is going on in its totality and express it.  If you need to scream, scream.  If you need to crawl into a fetal position in the deepest corner of your garage, do so.  If you need to hit pillows, do that.  But do it from a space of allowing.  Allow emotions to flow, whether through written words on the page, wordless sounds, or through the voice.  Let it come through your body; place your body in a position that encapsulates your experience.  Let thoughts ramble forth from your mind.  But above all, allow all this from a place of play.  Be a child again.  This is through a choice to let it all come forward, laughing at yourself from the dual perspective of seeing how whole you truly are while allowing all the "imperfections" come forward.  You know that this is not defining you, and yet it is just perfect the way it is.  If you can't inhabit that space, allow whatever you can.  The point isn't to change anything in this moment, but to allow it and give full expression without judgment or control.

 

The magic of fully allowing is that it transforms.  If you are fully you in one moment, there is no limit to what you can be in the next moment.  It's amazing how someone's experience changes by the end of the exercise, especially if there's someone you trust watching, which is encouraged! 

 

Beliefs permeate the being on every level.  Transformation can manifest through altering one level or another of perception, and it is possible to alter beliefs within the space of an eye blink, thereby creating irrevocable transformations that reverberate through all levels of the Self.  And it is true also that transformation within the Self will create transformation within a wider space known as a family, a community, a world, or a universe, or all of them - for they are all essentially the same.  For this, then, we can change the phrase into "change your thoughts, change the world". 



Saturday, August 18, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
I'm continuing to write with Karen Murphy the "Loving Awareness" material, so I thought I'd share the following with you, on pain. It was written as a bit of experiment, so perhaps you notice a difference. It's part of an entire book we're writing, which is of course a lot longer than just this. I hope this isn't too out of context. It certainly goes into fairly abstract concepts, but we're aiming for the universal here!


All of you have likely heard talk about the universality of  Love.  It's in many places, from the  Bible saying "God is Love" to various newer teachings. For instance, the most famous quote of A  Course in Miracles is :

 
"The opposite of love is fear, but  what is all encompassing can have no opposite."


According to this, the universe itself is composed of  nothing but love.  And yet our  experiences seem to be full of things which do not appear loving.  Others may treat us with disdain and rudeness,  and we ourselves may experience emotions such as pain, anger, despair and grief  that we think are as far from the experience and ecstasy of love as can be.  And yet, if the universe itself is made of  love and we are part of the universe, then logically we ourselves should be  made of nothing but love.  So why do we  experience such intensely negative emotions such as pain, when love is supposed  to be ecstatic? 

It at this point, let's go beyond the labels we have for  these emotions.  Labels keep us fixed  into a relatively small concept, and in fact there are wide differences between  two people for the same experience of an emotion.   If looked at deeply, there is a fullness within every emotion that  most people do not even glimpse.   In  fact, each emotion is not a limited experience - it's an entire spectrum,  much like the light that comes to us from the sun.  And like light, there are even huge swaths  of the spectrum that we cannot even see.   In fact what we know of as pain, for instance, is but a small area of  the spectrum available of this one basic experience, but a small part of the  expansive range open to us. 

To go into more detail, let us now take a look at pain.  To use the analogy of the body, pain serves a  very useful purpose.  It lets us know  when there is something important that we need to focus on.  If we are being stabbed by a sharp needle,  for example, it is good to take immediate action to remove the needle from our  body.  Sometimes the pain is more chronic  and speaks of long-term actions necessary to create a healthier environment in  the complex system that is our body.  So  to put it simply, pain is a good thing.   However, if we think of pain only as an enemy, and therefore do not  listen to it, it is quite possible that the symptoms will grow exponentially  larger until we reach the point where we see nothing but the pain.  It is not pain that is the problem, only our  experience of it and our reaction to it.

The inward experience of emotional pain is similar.  It serves a very useful function - it lets us know what needs to be listened to and transformed. When fully allowed, this can be a truly transcendant experience. In most cases we see, of course, it's misery, but to give a wider picture of what   pain can look like, it is useful to think of it again as a spectrum. Here's a table showing a range:



..>..>
..>..>

Blocking


  • A complete void.

arrow

  • Overwhelmed with pain; wishing death.

  • Alone; lost in pain, blaming others.

  • Bonding with others through sharing pain.

  • Recognizing pain as an impetus to start caring for self.

  • Fully listening to pain to help transformation.

Allowing


  • Transcendence.

spectrum

 


All of these  come from the same basic internal energy,  that which we label "pain".   In this one  emotion, there is a universe of difference in the experience.  And yet the experiences are intricately  intertwined; in each moment of meeting pain there can be an instant shift into  another mode of experience.  The only  difference between the states listed above is the degree of allowing we have for the pain - which is the degree we make pain our friend, becoming one with it.  Being completely in the present moment, in an  ever-fulfilling process of allowing, opens us to the entire range.  Resisting the experience will tend to move us  to the more blocking side of the spectrum.  Normally we sway back and forth a fair bit, even for minor pains!   

Both ends of the spectrum are of course connected.  Numerous accounts, such as Eckhart Tolle,  exist of completely giving up in the pain of existing, surrendering to "the  void", and then dramatically shifting to an ecstatic experience of  transcendence. 

How does this then relate to love?  Most people think of love as an  emotion.  If this were so, it would limit  Love.  Love itself is not an  emotion.  Love is the entire spectrum. Think then, that pain is not seperate from it; pain is part of that vast spectrum.  Love is a complete allowing of everything. It includes pain, joy, anger, longing,  connections with others, and all human experience.  Love in some way can be likened to the space  through which light can pass.  It is Love  itself that provides the allowing that enables pain to be the complete blessing that it can be, if it is  surrendered to. If you think to a time where you sat in front of someone you knew loved you, it was at a time when everything in you was welcomed. This included all your emotions, all your thoughts, all your desires; it was all invited and allowed. Why then should loving ourselves be any different?  Or other forms of Love?  Poets certainly have it right when they talk of the sky loving the earth.

This of course in no way minimizes the paralysing agony that pain can be, or is it in any way saying people are "responsible for their pain". It takes experience and wisdom to trust the process of allowing and surrendering to an experience, and most people need much support to do this. That's what friends are for, after all. Still, I hope by looking at pain this has given a glimpse of  possibilities that exist in every moment, inside every emotion. 

 

PS. There's an online group aimed at discussing concepts like this and integrating it into our lives which I'm a co-owner on. If anyone is interested in it - which does involve time, exercises and experiments - please send me mail. And of course, comments and questions are always welcomed!

Sunday, August 05, 2007 

Category: Travel and Places

I've recently had talk with a few people about India and my experiences of being there.  It's been over 10 years ago now since I was there for about 6 months.  I arrived without friends, guides or plans - simply bringing a large (but mostly empty) backpack and a guidebook.  I saw ancient ruins, ashrams, monasteries, beach resorts, sky-touching mountains and parched deserts.  I treked in the Himalayan mountains and river rafted and kayaked down mountain rivers.  I saw the extremes of India's culture, from the poverty, to the spiritual traditions, to the Hindu-Muslim clashes.  The experiences from that trip expanded my mind and helped shape my mind to be able to see outside the cultural assumptions we take for granted.

Now one of the most common questions I've received over the years has been about the poverty in India.  "It must have been so hard to see all the poverty and suffering there!" is something I've heard over 100 times.

The answer is of course, paradoxical.  The truth is that it felt like an extreme relief.  It was a profoundly freeing experience to actually see the suffering that was actually there.  Here we avoid this.  In the North American culture most of us are in, we do all we can to remove all sights, sounds and impressions that suffering exists.  We try to hide homelessness, ignore poverty, and even amongst friends there's usually a tacit agreement to filter our emotions and sufferings.  Showing these in a corporate office is usually taboo.  We're uncomfortable with the emotions that seeing direct pain can bring up.  In India, on the other hand, it's all visible.  The leprosy on the street is visible; the millions of people living in shacks with unclean water and no toilets are visible.  The simmering rage between Hindus and Muslims is also visible.



(This kind of sight, by the way, is not that uncommon.  Leprosy is quite common and visible in many streets)


It's hard to convey why this is such a relief.  But perhaps an analogy is in order.  Say two people are in an exclusive relationship and one person cheats.  The other person knows (as they usually do), but it hasn't been brought out in the open.  There will be a great tension in all interactions between them, because there is a great pain waiting to come up that they resist.  So until it does, there will be a feeling of walking on eggshells, and if it continues, there will often be an entire routine built around avoiding the truth that a broken agreement has taken place.  Misery will appear.  When and if it actually does become visible, and both parties put all their emotions on the table, there will be a palpable sense of relief; the need for pretense is gone.  Both sides can actually reveal their emotions instead of living within emotional castles of thick stone walls.

The truth is that suffering exists.  Buddhism starts with this simple statement as the first noble Truth.  Our society intellectually knows this, but we push it away emotionally.  We say "yes, I know about suffering, I know it's there, but I don't want to touch it or be confronted with it".  And yet, when we do actually touch it, our heart opens.  We simply can't act compassionately until we actually touch another's sufferings.  We can't understand others until we fully listen, and listening means fully allowing them to touch you.  This touch involves more than the hospital rubber gloves of analysis; it involves an openness that has the possibility of being overwhelmed for a while.  Yet being overwhelmed, as I was in India for some time, develops the heart.  Emotional muscles need to work, or they atrophy.  Allowing ourselves to be touched, and yes, sometimes hurt, by others' sufferings lets the full range of the heart come forward.

It was actually more of a shock for me to arrive back in Canada than it was arriving in India.  I was presented with all my family patterns of hiding real emotions (similar to most families here), and realized I simply could not go back to the way I was acting before.  So over the next few years, I did my best to be visible with what was going on.  This caused many upsets in my family, but has immeasurably helped me.  My parents may not always feel comfortable with me, but their reaction is based on who I actually am, not a game we play.  

I generally recommend being immersed in a similar culture for anyone wishing to see other ways of living.  It's not just India of course; there are many, many other cultures that don't have the emotional straightjackets we do.  An example closer to home might be Italians; in general, they tend to be much more visible with emotions, and if fights break out, so what?  It doesn't mean a lack of love.  It can easily be part of it.

Thursday, August 02, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
The following is a question NipTuck (another Karen!) sent me a couple days ago, and my response, which I've expanded a little since then but not changed any meanings.  Thought it was worthy enough to post, which I am doing with permission.   She has a blog too, though it's not at all about "spiritual" or "growth" matters.  I do NOT live like a monk outside of this blog, for your information!  :-)



NipTuck  : How does one know if they are being irrational or acting logically when something that seems to be unfair towards them drives them to anger and voicing such w/out insults but vehemently?



First of all, acting within the confines of reason is simply a straightjacket.  Living this way, you will never avail yourself of the immense resources you have at all times in terms of intuition, emotional support, passion, and a pure sense of play.  Life leaves a lot to the imagination, as it was meant to.  Allow that to blossom.  If you feel like being "irrational", do so!  In ways, of course, that do not restrict others to also blossom.

It's taken me a long time to see that everything within me is undeniably a blessing to the world.  Yes, everything, without exception.  The same goes with you and everyone on earth. And yet people can perform actions that are extremely hurtful and cause immense sufferings. There is a paradox in this, of course, and seeing through it is essential for finding self-love.

Consider, then, two scenarios to help understand this dichotomy, which could arise from being close to a man who quite obviously is in a lot of pain.  In the first case, he considers you the cause of his pain and frustration.  He expresses this with rage and helplessness, making it clear that you're the problem, and your denials cause him to react with more vehemence because he needs you to help get rid of all his inner problems.  He keeps verbally attacking you until you either walk away or attack back.  This quite obviously can cause suffering and distrust between you.

The second scenario is when the man is feeling great pain and frustration, some of which you triggered, but considers you the witness only. The rawness of the pain is shown directly to you, and helps you see that he too has a tender heart, can easily be hurt, and can believe in his own smallness.  It could be shown indirectly, by screaming at pillows and launching attacks at them - which of course they're less apt to believe than you!  It could also be shown via prose, poetry, or even in song.  But in the doing so, you are helped in seeing the innocence both of the other person and of yourself, for you too have these elements in you.  The next time you encounter them in you it will flow easier, and this experience helps bring you closer together, even if you are not in a conventional relationship.

Now, there is no difference whatsoever in the pain and anger in the person between the two cases.  The only difference is in the expression of it, the projection (or lack of it), and the vulnerability allowed.  In the second case, there was no desire to avoid the intensity of the emotion whatsoever, and hence no projection.  This is ultimately self-love, and helps bring love out to the world.  It is not a rigid "I must face this and deal with it" attitude, which is an avoidance in itself, but a gentle allowing that has you as a witness.

So how to get there? Above all, be gentle with yourself. It's good to have practice; if you have pain and hurt towards someone where there honestly isn't enough trust to be vulnerable like this, take care of yourself and back away.  Know that by not being a punching bag you are taking care of yourself, which is a part of self-love.  Find a friend to be vulnerable about it first, or express it creatively by being vulnerable with yourself.  Ultimately the more self-love you have to yourself about your own pain, the less tendency you will have to make it the fault of others.



NipTuck:  More specifically, how does one handle the world in general?   Say, Insurance adjusters, office mates, peers, rude people who cut in front of you, try to cut you off in traffic... how does one react?

There is this paradigm it appears to me, where if one does exert some resistance (vocally) in others intrusions,they are considered trouble makers.  Whereas if one does not say anything, one gets run over by the world at large.   How does a person survive in this world? Allow others to run you over, or get angry. I speak up when people do this and then I feel guilty.  It's almost the survival of the fittest I feel.  Everyone has become so narcissistic that I feel the continual need to avenge myself.



As someone vocal myself, I strongly notice when speaking up means I'm considered a "trouble maker".  So I take care of myself by stepping back if I feel if there is no openness whatsoever to anything opposed to preconceptions that exist.  I have no problems speaking up, but there is no value in bashing needlessly against walls.  

But really, the question is: what do you want? Do you want to be in the game of oneupmanship with others? To you want to endlessly compete, in traffic and other things? Or do you simply want a feeling of peace and contentment in your life? If it's the latter, then affirm that. Try to live that in traffic jams, in the office, with rude people.  Different priorities bring different results.

There's a saying in the Tao Te Ching that says "The sage does not compete with anyone, hence no one can compete with him.".  It applies here.

That said, even if you do desire well-being above everything else, of course there will be triggers. There will be people pissing you off. There will be people who require you to set firm boundaries.  This is part of life, and expecting otherwise will lead to more upsets.  But at the same time, there are ways to live in this world (and among such people) that are ultimately loving to yourself and others, even in trying circumstances.

Learning how isn't a short term matter. If there are emotional minefields in your life, where you're easily triggered, then it's certain life won't be peaceful immediately. However, it's the direction of the next step that's always most important, rather than the war zone you may find yourself in.  Taking even one small step closer to peace may not feel like much at first, but it causes ripples both in yourself and those around you.  Like I said above, everything inside ourselves is a gift.  Allow it, value it, and try to find ways to let your honest self out - including honest emotions even if you think they are "negative" - in ways that do not make fault with other people . Blogging can be great, as you know! But above all, allow your feelings and reactions in such a way that doesn't make anyone else wrong.


Indent


So yes, I do like questions that are on the flow of this blog.  They're very much welcome!   And if you like my writing, you're welcome to share it in some way  Use the "email to a friend" link, send an email, put a link somewhere, anything is appreciated.  Thank you for reading!
Thursday, July 26, 2007 

Current mood:allowing
Category: Religion and Philosophy
For this blog I'll write about anger.  It's a greatly misunderstood emotion in our culture.  It's both decried and cultivated at the same time.  There are enormous mixed messages we get on a daily basis, and because of this, many people have walled away any possibility of this emotion being shown.  To an extreme, there might even be a message that it's best to always step back and "see the perfection of the other" - which involves walling away anything critical - rather than show any anger.

Now, let's look at anger directly.  I hope you can pause here to look at it with me; we all have it inside ourselves.  Think of someone or something that simply pisses you off.  Please sit with it a while; listen to it.  This isn't about a venting process, which is what happens when the easiest words are found.  Listening is a deep, meditative process that doesn't wish anything to go away or be fixed.  Pay attention to what it really wants to say.  Listen to it equally if it's to someone else or to yourself.

(I hope you take a few moments to breathe deeply and listen to yourself here)



When I hear anger, it's a voice with power that says "Something isn't working here. Please listen!".   That's all.  No violence at all.  What isn't healthy about that - speaking out when something doesn't work?

What most people confuse with anger is projection.  Projection naturally happens when there's a total non-acceptance of a real process going on within.  It says "this is not mine!  It must be yours."  And thus a violence caused by the rupture that begins totally with Self.  Thus, if something isn't working internally and there's denial that it IS within, there is a constant push externally that is the anger turned into projection.  Of course, in this case, there is nothing the outside world can do to change the internal world of the person, so "help" turns two ways:  either to encourage listening and care of Self, or to encourage numbness so the inner turmoil isn't felt.   Many "safe" atmospheres encourage the numbness by creating a whitewashed atmosphere where all possible triggers are removed.

To look at healthy anger, a good example is Gandhi.  Gandhi made it very clear the behavior of the British in India wasn't working; it caused tremendous suffering, he did everything in his power to encourage people to listen and see it clearly.  He focused solely on the behavior of the British, not the British themselves, who were generally wonderful people.  He did not make them wrong (i.e., use projection), but focused on behavior that was changeable - and so documented the systematic methods of poverty and oppression that occurred in those colonial times.  People wouldn't think it was anger, because there was no rage or violence at all.  He moved from a place of power that no one could take away, and part of that was his non-violence.  But the root energy was anger - simply in a very evolved form.  It was again, "This isn't working - Please listen!".   This goes back to earlier posts expressing there are no "bad" emotions.  Any emotion can be transformed to a place where it services mankind.  Without exception.

An example closer to home might be a mother watching over a child.  If the child places itself in danger, the natural response tends to be anger.  In a mother with no shame of their anger, this comes out as a clear "get back!  I care about you!"  I've been lucky enough to see people without any shame of their anger, and the response children have to this is lovely.  They will tend to smile, because the anger clearly comes out of Love.  However, if there's significant guilt and pain surrounding anger, all of this inner division comes out in the communication.  The result is that it feels awful, because with the disharmony expressed in that shout, there love in the communication doesn't shine through.  The crux is that the problem is with the disunity, not the anger.

One of the false images people have of anger is that it's a way to attack the other person.  However, if you've ever seen someone "let it all out", without defenses, it is an incredibly vulnerable state.  We tend to go through life guarding against others knowing what we care about.  Showing anger without guile or protection puts it all out on the table. You are making what you passionately care in plain view all to see and touch.  People subconsciously protect against this because of the possibility the other person will use that vulnerability to attack.  This is of course, very valid; it happens fairly regularly.  Those who wish to use this vulnerability to attack may bait others, waiting for others to let loose so they can then give a "sucker punch" of a sort.  This doesn't take anything away from those who reach this kind of vulnerability; it takes great courage to be fully open this way.  Most people get angry half-heartedly.  They let the other person they are angry, but they don't get to vulnerability.  Others tend to feel this lack of vulnerability and react defensively.  Many activists are in this state.

When it comes down to it, anger deserves a deep and profound listening, like everything else. It is often a healthy desire for boundaries.  Sometimes it is the simple message that something isn't working, and thus can be a "cover up emotion", pointing to a geyser of other emotions that are crying out to be released.  But the anger itself is not a problem. It is something that needs to be given a loving space of listening, not "fixed".  There is nothing that needs to be done with it, other than listening.  Allowing it transforms it, and lets everyone involved see what truly wasn't working.  This is a gift to the world.


 
Now, the events of the last few weeks as described in the last blog for me brought up a lot of anger.  Quite frankly, I love my anger.   And because of that, no one would ever describe me as an "angry person".   I love that I speak up when something doesn't work.  I love that I do my best to do it from a vulnerable space.  Sometimes I fall flat on my face, but that's what learning's about.  Look what happened in the previous blog - there are great benefits to getting to a place where support is needed!

Be whole.
Monday, July 23, 2007 

Current mood:  indescribable
Category: Religion and Philosophy
Alright, this one has more of a glimpse into my personal journey...

The last couple weeks have surprisingly full of triggers for me with an online group that I've been part of, a group related to the Michael teachings.  Although it was somewhat painful and resulted in me distancing myself away from it, great lessons came up for me.   

Essentially, in this group, which is spiritually oriented and focused on balance and behaving with compassion, a few people (some of whom were moderators) behaved very differently in private emails than they did in public.  In one case, it was flaming; throwing insults, wishing pain and destruction, being quite nasty.  This went to the level of being an online stalker over the past few months, and there were some phone calls and text messages as well, all nasty and wishing pain.  This was primarily to
Karen (Lightspring on here), but to a lesser extent to me.  

What triggered my own pain was that the online group (although I've met most of the people on it face to face), which styles itself as focused on community and support, was totally unsupportive of bringing this up publically.  It was "a private matter", and it didn't matter if it got to abusive actions, it wasn't their business.  Even if the other person (who was part of the group) made nasty innuendo publically.  The hypocrisy of this struck me - the philosophy of community and support seemed to be thrown by the wayside.  The moderators even suggested the police, showing they understood the scope of the issue somewhat, but refused to do anything themselves.  It came to a crux Monday.  I'd posted publicly what was going on as factually as I could, without any blame that I could see, and was basically told "personal issues involving people we know are not something we want to see on here".   Nice support there!  It brought up a lot of pain inside me - especially long term stuff related to support.

So that's the background.  However, this is about my personal journey, not any rant on the flaming the anonymity of the internet can bring.  Such things abound in this extremely isolated society we've created.  What resulted next is what's important.


Karen called me to offer her support on it Monday, and was indeed incredibly supporting.  What was unusual and special about the call was not anything she said.  The entire call, lasting close to 90 minutes, did not have many words in it at all!  She simply gave me space to be who I was, which included the pain that was occurring.  There was absolutely no "problem" to fix, nothing to resolve, nothing to make go away.  It was simply two people with much love for each other simply being present, and the fact that there was a large amount of pain was incidental.

So what happened?  Of course, like anyone in pain, at first I wished other people would change so I wouldn't have to be triggered like this.  I'm human too!  Though I knew it was a triggering, so I didn't identify too much with these thoughts.  After muddling along, gradually accepting that there was no escape from the inner landscape I was in, I started scribbling on a drawing pad in charcoal.  No definite shapes; just dark, sharp movements, expressing the chaos inside myself right now.  Balls of small abysses accumulated on the page, bringing form to my internal world at that moment.  It didn't last long, but was enough to bring more acceptance and flow to what was coming.  Karen was silent all through this.  This was not a silence based on zoning out; she was present with me, with her full attention at hand.  There was nothing that needed to be said; her presence said it all.


Her words describing her state were "It was about holding a space open for you, and acknowledging the perfection of whatever it is you were experiencing.  In that moment, it was perfect, and there was no need to exert influence to change.  I knew you were capable of doing it yourself."  



Soon enough, I felt more open to myself, breathing more fully, and lied down on the couch.  Tears came.  Tears, tears, and more tears.  There were no reasons for the tears at first, and I didn't need any.  Some times reasons are like a straightjacket, restraining the human dance of emotions.  I simply allowed what needed to come out.  The expansive presence that was created in that moment created a magical, permissive atmosphere.  This was no exercise of catharsis as seen in workshops; it was simply a gentle allowing that fully reincorporated parts of me back into myself.  Tears flowed for the better part of an hour.  Karen felt the pain, but didn't see anything to fix at all.  The warm silence continued.  After tissue after tissue got tossed away, I came to a realization:   I discovered I didn't really know what true support was.  I wanted it of course, but didn't have the knowledge that can only come from repeated experience.  This not knowing was profoundly opening; it brought me to see how much support I was getting in that moment.  Funny how not knowing and seeing go hand in hand.

Going through my own pain and the openings this created helped bring me to a more neutral space about the online incidents.  I've backed away considerably with those groups, because it's clear that their version of support and community is quite restrictive to me; it's based on protection instead of vulnerability.  But this is perfect; they simply want different things.  I'll continue to meet these same people face to face (except the person who did the stalking), but won't expect any support from them.  Paradoxically, this whole experience helped me find far more support for myself; the experience of spacious allowing and acceptance has followed me since.  The image I've had of support has changed from one of a building's unshakeable foundation to something like an open space to play in, based in the present moment.

All of this has been intrinsic to my exploration of universal Love; it's brought more of a visceral understanding, and definitely brought strides in living it with myself and others.  My friend
Sophie got a whiff of that Friday!


..


(oh yes, and btw, it was my birthday Saturday!  It was wonderful!   Here's a picture of me to celebrate.  No, this wasn't taken on my birthday - rather a few weeks ago - and I love it!  The background is one of
Sophie's paintings, in my home.)

Monday, July 02, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
As I mentioned in the previous blog, I'm co-writing a book with Karen Murphy centered around the subject of Love.  Notice the capitals - it's intentional.  It's really meant to go beyond all the cultural stereotypes and assumptions we have about the subject (e.g., "a vague syrupy emotion that guarantees happiness") coming back time and time again to the truth that we ARE Love.   Every part of us, without exception.  This of course is interplayed with all the duality we live in here on Earth.  We're mostly done the "Levels of Love", which aren't based on cosmic grade schools, but more about the degree of allowing we have in our lives.  The duality is that Love already exists perfectly inside us, but our awareness and experience of it may not be consistent with this.  It doesn't focus on the idea that a "higher level is better", but instead, on seeing the perfection and unity of all expressions of Love, even actions such as survival-focused, reptilian brain ones which we tend not to think of as such.  It is via that perception that allow more expansive experiences.



I'd like to intersperse this with a little personal report on how this is affecting me.

Many changes seem to be happening inside me as this writing and channeling is going on.  First, as the focus on what Love IS continues, more potential for the experience of it has shown itself, and at the same time, more light has been shown on the manners in which I resist it.   Things I've not fully accepted about myself.

For example, this morning as I was meditating in the sunlight, fears came up strongly.  Before, I would feel plenty of discomfort, with many impulses to get up and abort the practice, but this time it was much more a direct experience - terror.  Today, these were all related to my impatience, such as what I'm "missing out", intolerant thoughts such as "why haven't I gotten over this yet!", and thoughts of all the other things I could be doing now.  The latter ironically included things my mind thinks would be loving - which were always about the future and not in the present moment.  My impatience also does a wonderful job in excuses to avoid any pains or intense feelings occurring in the present moment.  Years ago I truly thought I couldn't handle intense emotions and needed to be "fixed".  Now there's still some terror, but I know what is "me" is truly bigger than any of them.  Ironically, the emotions I could accept were the ones which I didn't feel were "loving" emotions.  This now is superimposed on my newer understanding and application of Love which includes ALL these aspects of myself, which paradoxically includes, for example, small minded bickering (within myself and with others), frustration with myself, intolerance, and pure pain. 

When it comes to it, Love has been emphasized to me over the last few years - of which Troy's group (Cocteauboy on here) has been a wonderful part - as a Wholeness.  That is, everything inside myself is already loving, including all parts I'd previously thought as not loving, such as anger.  More than that, it all IS Love.  This has changed so many perspectives, especially any perspective that thinks there is something in myself, or others, that needs fixing.  That change has been such a shift in truly appreciating the magnitude of simply being alive on Earth and in getting to a sense of play with all of life.



back to the book...

The following are 3 exercises that I am putting out there.  I would like as many people to try them as possible and report back any experiences and thoughts they have.  So no, you don't have to comment right away on this one! 

 

  1. The first exercise has simply to do with assisting you in transcending the sense of isolation that can exist.  Position yourself where you can feel sunlight on your body, preferably your face.  Closing your eyes, imagine yourself becoming one with the particles of light and energy that rain down upon you and around you.  Feel the Love that comes to you from the enormous source of energy that is available to you at almost any time.  This source of energy has, of course, no expectation whatsoever from you.  It is freely given.  It is yours.  Feel, then, again, the sense of oneness that begins to pervade you as you feel the warmth spread on your skin.  Allow yourself the freedom to expand INTO that source, for you are indeed a part of it.  Your sense of awareness, then, may begin to extend to other facets of nature.  Sense the trees in their perfection.  Inhale the scent of flowers, of the damp earth fresh from rain.  Listen to the sounds of nature all around you.  If you are not in a place where nature can be sensed so closely, you can still feel at one with the walls and the carpeting and the roof around you, for all of these things once came from nature.  Awareness that a thing is as perfect in moving from its original form to another will increase your sense of oneness with everything around you.

 

  1. For the second exercise, we encourage you to extend your awareness to the perceptions of others.  All of you have experienced a time when someone moved past your own internal boundaries and created within you a sense of discomfort.  This is especially true of children, and you all have memories of being children when your boundaries were crossed.  Many children react with violence, and some withdraw.  It is this pattern of behaviour that persists later in life.  It is important, then, to maintain an awareness of the boundaries of others when you attempt to connect with them.  The innate desperate we spoke of earlier creates a sense of urgency in this connection.  However, it is important to temper the connection within the confines of the boundaries of whom you are attempting to connect.  This then, leads to the following :

Imagine your self surrounded in a circle of your closest friends, acquaintances, or family members.  You love all of them.  You are aware of their love for you.   Starting with a very small circle, imagine yourself sending an invisible cord from your heart to theirs through which to connect more closely.  If this is done slowly and with gratitude, you will sense at some point a slight barrier between you.  Allow then, the circle to begin to widen.  You notice this creates a momentary sense of the potential of loss.  Be aware that through the cord of connection the circle could widen to an infinite degree without you ever losing connection.  Practice attempting connection, feeling a boundary, and allowing the circle to widen with those of your immediate acquaintance for some time.  You will notice more than likely, shifts will occur within the construct of these relationships.  Notice them and allow them while maintaining the knowledge that the connections can never be severed, no matter how wide the circle grows.  You may wish to continue this exercise and practice it with those with whom you are less acquainted with, for instance, work colleagues.  It is not necessary to maintain an intense connection with those around you, but instead to simply allow a connection to develop and grow naturally between you.  Once allowed to develop naturally, the connection will strengthen of its own accord.

 

  1. The third exercise involves increased awareness of Self.  You have all likely heard that in order to love others, you must first love yourselves.  We would not put it in such stark terms.  However, loving yourself is the SAME as loving others.  There is no difference.  Love is Love.  Visualize yourself, then, high up on a remote, rocky mountaintop.  Your friend the sun gently warming your face.  Your awareness extends to the circle you made in the second exercise, however it is far, far away, and you are simply alone.  You sense the grandeur of your surroundings, yet, at the same time, you are aware of the perfection that exists within the rhythmic being of your own heart.  And it is this sound that now lulls you to sleep at night.  On this mountaintop, you are aware of the rhythmic ebb and flow of the tides of the movement of clouds across the atmosphere of the ever present circling of the seasons as they occur around you.  On this mountaintop, you experience time both very quickly and very slowly at the same time.  Allow then, your awareness to build towards the circle you made, and toward the source of the sun at the same time.  Moving in both directions causes your own inner source, your heart, to grow as well.  You are now aware that your entire existence can reside within the vastness of your own heart.  This gives you a tremendous sense of peace and gratitude for the perfection that is you.


Again, if you feel inclined, try it out (taking your time to do it in an unrushed manner), and comment back with any experiences.  This will help the evolution of the book!  Yes, you too Troy!



(The above was channeled by Karen Murphy at http://light-spring.com/. And yes, she does personal work too.)

Friday, June 29, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
Hmm, I've noticed a dip in comments over the last few months as well as readers.  I'd guess part of this is that myspace isn't as popular - I know *I'm* tired of refusing friend requests every day from all those porn accounts.  But I'm wondering if there's other factors, and I'm always open to hearing what those are.  I try to practice deep listening, and I am very grateful for having people read what I write.  [and to the people who ask, yes I generally love have what I write posted, linked to, or forwarded elsewhere.  I also am glad to do the same for others whos writings have a strong resonance with my own.]

 So I thought it'd be a good opportunity to ask for feedback.  Any feedback whatsoever  is welcome, though of course it's unlikely I'd take comments such as "you suck!" to heart!  To get things started :

  • Do you want posts more often?
  • Are the topics ok?   My mind works naturally with abstract thoughts, so perhaps I focus too much on this.
  • Do you want more personal items?  (Note:  part of the reason for this is that there hasn't been a lot of drama in my life, though it's been very joyful!)
  • Are there any suggestions for areas to write about?
  • (and of course, there's no limits to this, these are only suggestions)

As well, just for an update, I am putting together material for a book with Karen Murphy, with the tentative title of "Loving Awareness".  Double entendre definitely intended!  So any help getting things rolling for this would be appreciated, both in terms of publicity, publishing, etc.  It's still months away, but there is a good deal of substance already.  The next post will have an exercise from it, which I'd love feedback for as well.


Thank you all!




Oh, and to have a LITTLE bit of substance to this blog, here's something short I wrote a little while ago on forgiveness:


Forgiveness is the present moment perception that there are no problems except those caused by false personality or "ego".

An image of forgiveness is not forgiveness. Forgiveness is not any image of love, or tolerance, or acting like someone else such as Gandhi. It is an honest perception. If there is any imitation occurring, there is no forgiveness - there is only the desire to forgive. This is definitely something, but it is not all the way.

Forgiveness will never include denial in any form. That includes denial of taking care of Self. It does not mean suppressing your own anger or being a martyr. It DOES mean that you see your own well being as fundamentally intertwined with all others, to the point that the "other" in "you did this to me!" fades into nothingness.

Tuesday, June 26, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
To recur on the theme of power from before, one idea that has stuck with me for many years is:

Power resides in simplicity.  The more powerful you wish to be, the slower and simpler you must be.

Gandhi was a superb example of this; he affected hundreds of millions by his simply living.  However, I had an experience during a debate a few weeks ago with the Work Less Party that illustrated this as well.  The debate was about whether it was right for Canada to send troops to Afghanistan.  There were, of course, many arguments which could be said for and against it, most of which exist for any nation in NATO.  However, my response bypassed all of this:

"I would say that we're answering the wrong question here.  The question isn't it whether it's right or not to send troops.  The question is :  what will help?"

(I then went on to document examples of missions in the world that actually did help, which were generally in the area of non-profit activities.)

The interesting thing about this tact is the lack of arguments it created.  If I had stated that something is wrong with that action, it's guaranteed to provoke conflict, because it is a divisive statement.  I would be saying that this behaviour and the people supporting it are wrong, and I'm right.  For example, those with loved ones in the military might feel personally attacked.  Others might contradict me as a matter of course without listening to me because they know that who they are isn't wrong (which is true) and the argument makes them feel so.

On the other hand, focusing on only what will help, without any judgment on the current state of affairs, creates much more room for both clear seeing and open choices.  It is a stance of Love.  Love starts with what IS, without any reservations about what it "should be".  It then focuses on what will help – even if it is only one small step on a path a continent away.  The next moment is responds in the same way, always with an open mind.  Sometimes what will help is different than before.

This a lot of parallels to other areas of activism and human conflict. Activism is filled with a lot of conflict driven behaviour.  So much of it comes from admirable motivations, such as environmental stewardship, a desire to end poverty and the inherent violence therein, an end to conflict, or a desire to have small voices heard.  However, if the focus is on what is wrong with the world, it will provoke defenses.  It may attract attention, but it rarely provokes listening.  By focusing on only what will help – not what will help me, or the environment, or them, but the entire situation without division – you remove so many barriers towards effective change.   Everyone wants to help.  Yes, even George Bush!  The problem isn't that – it's the myopic vision that cannot see the whole picture that creates the situation.  Bypassing right and wrong creates a shortcut into this big picture.



This applies to personal relationships as well; when one person says "you did this to me!" there is an inherent conflict in that statement.  It's a desire to make the other person wrong.  Changing that to a desire to help the situation – for both parties to experience joy – will always change perspective.  Sometimes what will help is an apology.  Other times it is clear communication of your experience without blame.  Still other times it is appropriate distancing.  It's all flexible and starts with clear seeing and listening.  That's what Love is.


[oh yes, and I did get a nice applause for my speech with some strong listening from the audience!]

Wednesday, June 20, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
In honor of my mother's visit (there's a conference on commodity stocks in town she's interested in) and in self-preparation here's some thoughts on boundaries.  I'm always learning about this when she's in town!

To start off with, probably the best analogy is that of a cell in our own bodies.



 
(Note: does anyone else see a similarity to a brain in that?)

The membrane in a cell does an essential function.  It controls, among other things, what goes out and what goes in.  This is essential, because analogous to us, what is food to one cell can be poison to another.  Without a good boundary, health decays as the composition becomes a cesspool, good for little in the long term.  Boundaries allow for choice, which is always a good thing.

Boundaries are also essential for clear perception.  Without them, it is impossible to tell causal factors, such "what brought up this feeling?"  Emotions and psyches are so enmeshed that eruptions occur without rhyme or reason. In a relationship, this most often shows up as drama.  Strong emotion occurs, and because of the lack of clear boundaries, it is impossible to determine where it comes from.  Thus there is a huge tendency for projection and condemnation.

This occurs even when positive intention is set.  Our psyche and energy systems have their "waste products", much like the cells in our bodies mentioned above.  Hence the term "shit"!   But this isn't a bad thing either; as above, what is excrement to one can be food to another, even on an energetic level.  However, in a close relationship it is likely the people are similar enough that this wouldn't be the case; hence the need for boundaries and awareness of actions.

Looking at two people are in a relationship and healthy boundaries aren't there (which is fairly common, as we as a society are learning about boundaries), I see two general patterns as coping mechanism.

i.    Distance/withdrawal.  In this case, at least one person withdraws to keep the relationship peaceful and not too rocky.  There is a spectrum of this, from conscious choice, to unconscious internal actions.  An example of the latter is the overfunctioning/underfunctioning dynamic, where one person relinquishes self in a dance of withdrawal or inability to cope to the other person, who acts like they're the one who "has it all together".  The former might include two people being "together" but living very separate lives; some societies have very rigid splits between men and women that help keep this distance to avoid drama and having issues come up. 

ii.    Conflict and drama.  Instead of distance keeping the peace, two people jump even closer together.  This can be for a variety of reasons, from wanting to "figure out the relationship", to "resolving issues", to wanting the other person to "just get it", to a passionate pronouncement of love without awareness of self.  Sometimes this results in conflict between the two parties, but it can also involve triangulation, where two people get close, but see all the froth of the chaos as being "caused" by a third party, which could be a person or even a political/social ill.  This coping mechanism is more about constantly "diving in", because if new issues constantly arise you never have to see more fundamental, pervasive choices.

It's important to note that there may be underlying issues in all these behaviors, but a major factor is proper boundaries.  Or to put it in other terms : knowledge of self.  To have proper boundaries goes hand in hand with self-knowledge, and the perception of how complete you are as an individual.

Now, that's all background.  So the question is, how are good, healthy boundaries achieved?  Many people get the idea that establishing good boundaries is a constant war zone, where an uneasy truce is arrived at after warning shots.  While that can be a boundary, it is not a healthy one, as it can all too easily escalate into an entrenched war zone. 

 Boundaries are a form of Love.

Although most people wouldn't see it as this, they do what they are meant to do: provide safety and protection, which is in itself a form of love. 

Nothing is lost by setting a boundary.  Rather, it is a declaration of the person, yourself, that you are creating in the moment.

Because boundaries are a form of Love, they already exist naturally.  You don't have to do anything. All you have to do is allow them.  Boundaries are not cultivated from mammoth efforts.  Rather, they are cultivated by allowing the complete expression of your full being, including self-protective elements.  This may include elements unacceptable to the culture you live in, but so what?  Your self is truly far too large to be contained in any culture.

Take a look at a cat being stroked.  At some point, it will have had enough.  If restrained or irritated by touch it doesn't like, it will set boundaries.  For those of you not close to cats, this isn't done with any malice, nor attack.  It is the allowing of a message from within that says : what I need in this moment has changed from previous moments.  Please listen.

Apart from simply allowing the process, another essential factor is play.  It's very hard to learn anything without playing!  You try something out of a sense of discovery and fun, and watch the results.  You then try something differently.  There's no right or wrong, only a continual process of learning about Self.  This is how children learn for so many years, until we educate it out of them.  It's no accident that most learning in life occurs while this sense of play is unrestrained.  Even though playing with boundaries can provoke irritation and ire, that's no reason to be too serious about it!

People may ask "but people often use setting boundaries as a form of control."  That's true.  If someone is triggered easily, they can be invasive on what's not alright with them.  This IS based in protection and self-love, trying to take care of one's self - but if a large amount of pain exists then the area of protection desired may be so large it crosses into other people's lives.  This is what control is.  In which case, these people need help.  And the best help is ALWAYS a good example - a living example of what a loving boundary looks like.  It's by living examples we change the world; merely speaking words doesn't actually do that much, comparably.   And yes, that gives me some humility!
 
Tuesday, June 05, 2007 

Category: Religion and Philosophy

If there's anything that seems to create both longing and repulsion in our society, it's power.  People see it, and are both drawn to it and repulsed by its misuse.  Even if we try to avoid power, we cannot avoid it completely.  Power is a need as much as breathing and connections are.  Without power, we would have no energy, and would only be a husk instead of dynamic beings.

However, the manifestation of power can vary greatly in its degree.  Here's some examples (those of you into Michael will recognize them) :

  • Power from obtaining blind unquestioning obedience from others.
  • Power from learning how to follow "the rules".
  • Power obtained from positions in society.
  • Power from being an active member in a community and the support that means.
  • Power obtained from knowing yourself.

You can see a progression there.  This comes in to what true power means to me:

You know when you have reached a state of true power when your power cannot be taken away.

If you look at the above list, only the last item cannot be taken away.  Others can refuse to listen and obey you, rules change, positions can disappear, and communities can undergo upheaval.  Jobs can be lost; friends can be offended.  As Buddhism teaches : everything in this world is transient.



However, I'm discovering more and more in my life things which are not transient, but are simply intrinsically part of who I am.  Here are some things that give me power.

 I have the power to not resist.

             Though this sounds paradoxical to power, it goes to the root of all suffering.  We suffer when we resist whatever experience is happening to us in this moment.  Creating division internally by resisting an experience is a form of violence to myself.  The knowledge I can choose to not resist anything gives power.  [Note that this doesn't invalidate or make wrong the choice to resist; sometimes it's very practical and necessary to say "No" or "Not now."]


I am open to support in all form

             Support is absolutely necessary for power and well-being.  No one can experience joy or power in an ivory tower.   A baby is perhaps the best example of this, as I've mentioned before.  They are profoundly open to others support; they attract attention and care through their trust and openness.  It is their openness that attracts rather than any active behavior.

            It is also powerful for me to be clear what "all forms" means.  It means that I simply don't know what form it will take, and I'm fine with not knowing.  It can be from friends.  It can be from guides.  It can be from the earth under my feet.   It can be from the simple sensation of brushing my fingertips against a couch, reminding myself of my aliveness.  Being open to all forms requires flexibility, which brings me to the next item…


I can adapt and change

        Those who are rigid in their approach to life find themselves in constant battle.  The world changes, as it's designed to do, but they cannot.  Therefore there is constant effort to make the world conform to their expectations.  If a tragedy occurs, they are devastated.  They will exhaust themselves in denial and in futile attempts to move the unmovable mountain.

        Some martial arts can be good for learning this; they teach us to use the energy of the other person in an adaptive way, never making more effort than necessary.  Some effort is always required, but by being flexible, we minimize it.   The Tao Te Ching says it wonderfully :


A man is born gentle and weak.
At his death he is hard and stiff.
Green plants are tender and filled with sap.
At their death they are withered and dry.

Therefore the stiff and unbending is the disciple of death.
The gentle and yielding is the disciple of life.
Thus an army without flexibility never wins a battle.
A tree that is unbending is easily broken.
The hard and strong will fall.
The soft and weak will overcome.

        This of course goes directly against the Hollywood ideal of power.  Try it on for yourself and see if it works better for you than that!

I have detachment from results

        Any attachment to an end result means there is something you want that can be taken away or not reached.  This in itself provides fuel for fear.  When we derive power from the process of living, instead of the results of our effort, there is nothing that can be taken away from us.

        The best example of this is the greek concept of
areté.  (see the link for a full definition)  The person with areté simply lives to their utmost potential, even in the face of hardship and disaster.  Their well-being is derived from this sense of excellence in their life.  Their actions come not from a place of desiring results, but simply because excellence is who they are.  It is a continual, self sustaining source of energy, filled with love of self.

I can speak out and exert influence

        This is what most people would think of when it comes to power – but note that it came after all of the above.  There is no power without the ability to make an influence.  However, it is the ability, or potential, that makes the power.  It there is a need to make an influence, there is of necessity an attachment and inflexibility.  There is also a lack of Love in the behavior, and so it will always create a counter force.  If you make influence from a place of complete acceptance and love, there is no additional resistance created.  People start listening.

Others' power adds to my power

        This is the final clincher, because at the root of true power is Love.  True power is in harmony with others; it rejoices when others gain more power in their own lives.   There is no one to compete with, and therefore no fuel for conflict, either externally or internally.


 

By all means, share your own source of power!

Currently reading:
Tao Te Ching, 25th-Anniversary Edition
By Lao Tsu
Release date: 04 March, 1997