Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 36
Sign: Leo
City: Paris
State: Ile-de-France
Country: FR
Signup Date: 11/27/2005
|
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
 |
5 November 2009
Women’s untold stories
By Michael Deibert
Le Monde diplomatique
(Read the original article here)
The
Bangladeshi author Taslima Nasrin, 47, has the European parliament’s
Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought, and the Unesco Prize for the
Promotion of Tolerance and Non-Violence. Nasrin is an outspoken
feminist and secularist, and a stern critic of the role of religion in
the oppression of women and the poor. She worked as a physician in
Bangladesh’s understaffed public hospitals before her exile in Europe
and the US in 1994.
Since she published her first book Shikore Bipul Khudha (Demands) in 1986, Nasrin’s works, including Lajja (translated into English as Shame),
have offended Muslim fundamentalists in Bangladesh, and the government
has banned some of them. In 2004 she settled in Kolkata (Calcutta),
India, which has a Bengali-language intellectual tradition. There she
ran into trouble with Indian fundamentalists. In 2007 she was assaulted
while attempting to speak at a book release event in Hyderabad; among
her assailants were members of India’s Majlis Ittehadul Muslimeen
party, including Indian lawmakers. In Kolkata, religious decrees called
for her death and there were violent protests. Nasrin was therefore
forced to move to the capital, New Delhi, before once again seeking
exile in Europe in March 2008.
Michael Deibert spoke to her in Paris.
MD: Can you tell me what inspired you to become a writer?
TN: I studied medicine, my father was a doctor, and
he inspired me. I wanted to be an artist, but when I studied medicine,
I really liked it. I always believed in signs, and I had a rational,
logical mind, so I became a doctor. I had a practice in public
hospitals, but unfortunately I had to quit my job because the
government asked me to stop writing if I wanted to continue working in
public hospitals, they didn’t like it. As a doctor, I could treat the
patients, but as a writer my work was a prescription for a sick
society. Lots of people were influenced by my writing, they became
agnostic or atheist or secular, and also very aware of their rights and
freedoms.
MD: How would you describe the political and social situation in Bangladesh today?
TN: The situation is ever worse. All the
politicians use religion for their own interests. They want to get
votes from ignorant masses. They don’t think of improving women’s
conditions, or economic conditions, or social conditions, even though
80% live below the poverty line, and not many women have access to
education or politics. Whoever comes into power, man or woman, from
whatever party, they are corrupt, they are hypocrites, and they don’t
do anything for women’s equality. They keep Muslim religious law, which
is oppressive to women, only to please the fundamentalists, but don’t
take action against them even though they are a big threat to the
progress of the society and to the equality of women. Half of the
population is female, but women don’t have jobs and are forced to stay
at home. This economic condition is not good for the country.
MD: How would you characterise the reception your books received in Bangladesh?
TN: People either loved me very much or they hated
me very much; there was no middle ground. I got a lot of support and
solidarity from the people who were truly secular and humanist. As long
as I was writing about oppression of women or criticising traditional
customs and culture, I got lots of support. But when I criticised
Islam, then I lost support.
It was very difficult to criticise Islam in a Muslim country. Of
course, I don’t just criticise Islam, I criticise all religions. But
when I criticised Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism for oppression of
women, I had no problem; nobody came to kill me. When I criticised
Islam, they issued fatwas and put a price on my head. And the
government threw me out.
MD: Can you describe the circumstances of your exile?
TN: It happened in 1994. I was in hiding in
Bangladesh; the government filed a case against me, claiming that my
books hurt people’s religious feelings. I had to go into hiding because
prison was not safe for me – my lawyer told me that I must not be
arrested because the police might kill me. It was difficult. I got
support from western countries, from the European parliament, and from
the US. I was granted bail and I had to leave. From then, I moved
around in Europe, but life was never easy: I was a Bengali writer, not
a writer who writes in a European language, so it was very difficult.
Exile was like waiting at a stop for a bus to get home. After
10 years the bus came, but I couldn’t go back to Bangladesh, so I went
to the Bengali part of India, where I could speak the language, where
we had the same culture and where I had my publisher and friends. I
settled there in 2004. But after three or four years I was attacked by
Muslim fundamentalists in India, and 10,000 people came on to the
streets and demanded my deportation. I was physically attacked in 2007
in Hyderabad; before that I had been attacked in 1993 in Bangladesh at
a book fair, where they destroyed a shop and burned my books publicly.
I always had police protection in India. But in Hyderabad, the
organiser who invited me to release my book there didn’t provide police
protection. After the programme I was about to leave, but 100 or so
Muslim fundamentalists started screaming at me in Telugu (a local
language), which I don’t understand, except (for the prophet’s name)
Muhammad. They started throwing whatever they could find, chairs and
things, at me. I thought I would be killed. I was very sure about that.
I was really, really scared. I didn’t want to lose my life in that way.
The police saved me. Some people tried to close the doors, but they
were breaking down the doors and shouting that they would kill me. It
felt like a decade passing.
Later I heard they were members of parliament present, but nobody
was punished. They said: “We are sad we couldn’t kill her today, but
next time we will kill her.” That was broadcast and no one was punished for that.
MD: What was your status in India?
TN: I had a residence permit. When I came back to
Kolkata, where I was living, the Chief Minister of Bengal, Buddhadeb
Bhattacharjee, was constantly asking me to leave the state, and sent
policemen to tell me to leave the state and even the country. I said
“no,” because I knew leaving the country meant the West, and India was
my adopted country. I didn’t want to leave. So the government put me
under house arrest in Calcutta, I wasn’t allowed to leave. Then violent
protests started and they bundled me out and put me in a cantonment in
New Delhi, where I was also under house arrest. The Foreign Minister,
Pranab Mukherjee, came to me and said that I must leave. I told him I
would not leave: if they wanted to put me in prison, fine, I was not
leaving. He was very, very angry.
I finally had to leave in March 2008 because my health was getting
very bad. I asked my friends to bring all my belongings from Kolkata to
Delhi, and the government put them in storage. I don’t know where the
storage is. (The Indian government) gave me a residence permit on
condition that I don’t live in the country, so it’s a meaningless
permit.
MD: How did you arrive in Paris?
TN: Paris is the first city of my life outside of
the Indian sub-continent. I came here a long time ago when I was
invited to talk about press freedom. My books were published in French.
I was invited by FNAC, and by the Nouvel Observateur.
MD: Why do you think it’s important to have a discussion about the role of religion in public life?
TN: I have seen how women suffer because of
religion, and because of religious law; if we can have secular law, and
a uniform civil code based on equality, then women wouldn’t suffer so
much. My writing is not only about religion; it also criticises
anti-female traditions and culture.
When I was in India, I wrote that Hindu culture is very
discriminatory against women. Nobody punished me for that. Yet they
branded me as anti-Islam. But I am not anti-Islam, I’m a secular
humanist. Women suffer and people hate because of religious faith. That
should end. There should be no Christian, Muslim, Jewish or Hindu law.
This is not secularism, this is not democracy, and women do not have
equal rights.
I continue to write because lots of people encourage me to go on
writing, and to tell their untold stories. They say they get strength
from me. And it is important to me to give strength to vulnerable, weak
people.
Michael Deibert is the author of Notes from the Last Testament: The Struggle for Haiti (Seven Stories Press)
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
 |
mardi 3 novembre 2009A few notes on the dismissal of Prime Minister Michèle Pierre-LouisBy Michael Deibert(Read the original article here) It
was said that during the reign of Jean-Jacques Dessalines - liberation
icon, military dictator and “emperor” who ruled Haiti from 1804 until
1806 - a certain level of corruption was tolerated and dismissed with
the phrase plumez la poule, mais ne la faites pas crier.
Pluck the chicken, but make sure it doesn’t squawk. That tradition of
corruption has been a woeful constant in Haiti’s political life since
Dessalines was assassinated over 200 years ago. Another chapter
in the disregard for honesty and transparency that infuses the marrow
of Haiti’s political class was written last week with the ouster of
Haitian Prime Minister Michèle Pierre-Louis by a parliament dominated
by the allies of Haitian President René Préval, who appointed
Pierre-Louis to the position a little over one year ago. Since
she assumed office in September 2008, Pierre-Louis was probably more
responsible than any other single individual in beginning to restore
some level of confidence in Haiti’s government and in encouraging the
stirrings of international investment in a nation of industrious but
desperately poor people all-too-often written off as an economic basket
case. During her tenure, the World Bank, the International Monetary
Fund and the the Inter-American Development Bank collectively canceled
$1.2 billion of Haiti’s debt, while the latter institution approved an
additional $120 million in grants to aid Haiti to improve such sectors
as infrastructure, basic services and disaster prevention. Having
previously led FOKAL, a civil society group supported by businessman
and philanthropist George Soros’ Open Society Institute, Pierre-Louis
was well-regarded both at home and abroad for her personal
incorruptibility, and displayed a surprisingly adroit political touch
on the international diplomatic stage. That being the case, one
might then ask why Haiti's senate, dominated by partisans of Préval’s
LESPWA political current, chose this moment to oust Pierre-Louis under
the almost-laughable rationale that, in her year in office, she had not
solved the problems caused by two centuries of what Haitian writer
Frédéric Marcelin in 1904 called “civil strife, fratricidal slaughters,
social miseries, economic ignorance and idolatrous militarism.” With
the ouster of Pierre-Louis spearheaded by such LESPWA stalwarts as
Senators Joseph Lambert and Jean Hector Anacasis, and with René Préval
himself remaining publicly silent as the plot to remove his Prime
Minister came to its inevitable and absurd conclusion, there appears to
be an explanation as simple as it is depressing for removing
Pierre-Louis at a moment when Haiti finally appeared to be gaining some
international credibility: The Prime Minister was standing in the way
of some powerful people making quite a lot of money. Government
insiders speak darkly about millions of dollars in aid money being
siphoned off via the Centre National des Equipements, a body
established by the Préval government to aid in Haiti’s efforts at
reconstruction after a trio of hurricanes killed at least 600 people
last year and further devastated the country's already fragile
infrastructure. The machinations of the Groupe de Bourdon, a cabal of
allegedly corrupt businessmen with firm roots in Haiti’s elite who have
the president’s ear, are also mentioned as culprits. Many of the
leaders of the drive to oust Pierre-Louis in Haiti’s senate are also
individuals around whom allegations of corruption - and worse - have
swirled for many years. Pierre-Louis’ assertion to me when I
interviewed her in Haiti this past summer that “chaos is good for a few
sectors” and that Haiti's political system would reject anyone who
would not allow themselves to be corrupted now appears to have been
prophetic [1]. After his return to office in 2006, René Préval
succeeded, against all the odds, in bringing relative peace to Haiti
after years of bloodshed, something for which he should be lauded in no
uncertain terms. However, the weight of corruption, along with a
tradition of impunity, is continuing to strangle Haiti under his watch,
and the ouster of Michèle Pierre-Louis is a worrying sign for Haitians
who have long sought in vain for decent leaders who would build a
government responsive to the nation’s poor majority. The fact
that Pierre-Louis’ replacement, Jean Max Bellerive, served in the
personal cabinets of both Jean-Marie Chérestal and Yvon Neptune, Prime
Ministers during the 2001-2004 tenure of Jean-Bertrand Aristide, an era
that was marked by both widespread corruption and political violence,
is cause for further concern. Bellerive has more than once been
described to me with the rather nasty Kreyol phrase se yon ti poul ki mare nan pye tab yo, an allusion to someone who essentially does whatever they are told. So
the forces of disorder have won this latest round in Haiti. No doubt
Haiti’s parliamentarians and perhaps even Préval himself are
congratulating themselves at their cleverness, with the country’s
corrupt bourgeois no doubt equally thrilled to now have a government
with a popular base that will more or less allow them to continue
unmolested with their nefarious activities. But, as Haiti’s
politicians strut around in expensive suits and travel over decaying
roads in SUVs with impressive armed escorts, they seem not to realize
that they should take no pride to occupy the position that they occupy
with their country in such a state, a fact that remains equally true
for many of Haiti’s economic elites. Since the deployment of an
international peacekeeping mission in Haiti in February 2004, almost 50
members of the United Nations mission in the country and thousands of
Haitian civilians have lost their lives to political violence, criminal
banditry and environmental catastrophes whose severity is directly
linked to the inability of the country’s political class to create some
semblance of a state to serve its people. This despite the presence of
7 UN missions to Haiti over the last two decades. Haiti’s
long-suffering people deserve better than the country successive
generations of leaders have bequeathed to them. In his finest novel, 1955’s Compere General Soleil,
Haiti greatest novelist, Jacques Stephen Alexis (who would be slain by
agents of dictator François Duvalier in 1961), wrote of the journey of
a pair of Haitians home from near-slavery in the neighboring Dominican
Republic that “the closer they came to the promised land, the more they
felt the net tightening around them.” The net of corruption has
been tightening around Haiti for far too long, and one hopes that those
remaining honest people in Haiti’s political and business sectors, and
Haiti’s genuine friends abroad, may find the tools to cut free that
confining web that has succeeded in almost choking the life of the
country that once taught the world so much about freedom. Michael Deibert is the author of Notes from the Last Testament: The Struggle for Haiti. His blog can be read here.[1] "The Elites Are Like a Huge Elephant Sitting on Haiti," Michael Deibert interviews Haitian Prime Minister Michèle Pierre-Louis, 3 July 2009, Inter Press Service
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
 |
A conflict of interests?Published: October 15, 2009Foreign Direct Investment(Read the original article here) A
corruption case in France against three African leaders has thrown into
question the economic relationships between developed countries and
their former colonies, reports Michael Deibert. A
court case brought against three west African heads of state by an
anti-corruption group has sparked debate in Europe on the economic
relationships between European governments and their former colonial
possessions. The case was brought in December 2008 by the French
branch of anti-corruption group Transparency International. It alleges
that president Denis Sassou Nguesso of the Republic of Congo, president
Teodoro Obiang Nguema of Equatorial Guinea and president Omar Bongo
Ondimba of Gabon (who died in June 2009) looted public funds to buy
luxury homes and cars abroad. Though representatives for the three
leaders were unavailable for comment to fDi, they have denied the
accusations in their respective local media. The accusations
have set up a tense legal wrangle in France, which claimed both Congo
(often referred to as Congo-Brazzaville to distinguish it from the far
larger Democratic Republic of Congo) and Gabon as colonies until 1960.
Though a French magistrate agreed in May to launch a probe into the
leaders’ assets, the Paris prosecutor’s office has appealed in an
attempt to have the investigation halted. “It shows that not all
judges in France are willing to abide by governmental or diplomatic
interests, and that they are willing to find out how these people were
able to buy these assets,” says Jacques Terray, vice-chair of
Transparency International France. “We hope that this will be a
precedent for other countries.” A decision regarding attempts by
the Paris Public Prosecutor’s office to halt the investigation –
arguing that Transparent International does not have the right to file
it as the organisation itself was not a victim of wrongdoing – is
scheduled to be issued by a board of inquiry on October 29. Turbulent historyThe
trio of countries at the heart of the case all tell a similar story of
a surfeit of natural resources and stunted political development that
has kept most of the region’s citizens politically disenfranchised and
economically impoverished to the benefit of a select few. Gabon’s
former president, Mr Bongo – who was Africa’s longest-serving ruler –
was educated largely in Congo, at the time called French Equatorial
Africa. A political chameleon, Mr Bongo shifted from running an
authoritarian one-party state to participating in relatively free, if
flawed, elections. Accusations of government corruption in
Gabon’s oil industry, which accounts for more than half of the
country’s GDP, have long been rife, and a 1999 US congressional
investigation into Citibank revealed its personal accounts held more
that $130m of Mr Bongo’s money. A 2007 French investigation of real
estate owned by the president and his family turned up holdings in
France worth an estimated $190m. For its part, Congo saw a
series of coups and assassinations from independence onward, with the
country ruled by the Marxist-Leninist Marien Ngouabi from January 1969
until his murder in March 1977, and current president Mr Nguesso
finally seizing power in 1979. In 1992 he lost a democratic election to
Pascal Lissouba but by 1997 had returned to the presidency with the
support of the Angolan army in a civil war estimated to have claimed at
least 10,000 lives. A peace agreement signed by the Nguesso government
with various rebel factions in 2003 is still considered to be fragile. Equatorial
Guinea, meanwhile, gained independence from Spain in 1968, at which
point Francisco Macías Nguema assumed power. In August 1979, Mr Nguema
was ousted and executed by his nephew, Teodoro Obiang Nguema, who has
ruled the tiny nation ever since, setting about creating a cult of
personality to rival anything seen in Africa. While state radio
praises Mr Nguema as being “in permanent contact with the Almighty”,
earlier this year gunmen attacked the national presidential palace. A
2004 plot by foreign mercenaries ended in some people, including
British nationals, facing jail sentences of more than 30 years. Though the three nations are all major oil exporters, foreign investment in the region is hardly limited to the oil sector. The
German energy utility Eon and Spain’s Union Fenosa have recently inked
agreements to turn Equatorial Guinea’s Bioko island into a centre for
gas exports, not only for the country itself but also for neighbouring
Nigeria, the seventh largest holder of natural gas reserves in the
world. Because of a facility constructed by Houston’s Marathon
Oil in 2007, Equatorial Guinea at present exports nearly 3.7 million
tonnes of liquefied natural gas a year. Such substantial foreign
investment could be jeopardised if the lawsuit calls into question the
legitimacy of trade with Equatorial Guinea. Diamond industryIn
a further diversification of the region’s economic role, in 2007 Congo
was readmitted to the Kimberley Process, which aims to stem the flow of
conflict diamonds, after having been expelled from the then year-old
process in 2004 for falsifying certificates of origin and exporting
diamonds from its war-wracked neighbour, the Democratic Republic of
Congo. The case is politically sensitive in France, as well, given the
country’s long and tangled history with sub-Saharan Africa. During
the 1981-95 government of François Mitterrand, France was the main
international backer of the ethnic Hutu dictatorship of Juvénal
Habyarimana, the Rwandan leader whose assassination in April 1994
served as the opening shot in the genocide that swept through Rwanda
that year. Policy towards Africa under Mr Mitterrand’s successor,
Jacques Chirac, was also marked by a high degree of French business
interests, with only muted calls for economic and political reform. During
a 2007 trip to Senegal, French president Nicolas Sarkozy called for an
end to Franco-African diplomacy based on personal relations between
leaders and rather for a “partnership between nations equal in their
rights and responsibilities”. However, in the five trips Mr Sarkozy has
made to Africa in the past three years, his criticism of corruption in
regions where French companies have extensive investment has been
minimal. Changing relationships“In
a larger context, this case is in a sense an end of the France-Afrique
foreign policy which has gone all the way back to the time of
DeGaulle,” says Sebastian Spio-Garbrah, west Africa analyst for the
Eurasia Group, a political risk research and consulting firm based in
New York. “Apart from Guinea, all the countries [in west Africa] more
or less agreed to remain within the Francophone zone, and the French
government had to protect or have a paternalistic relationship with
these people.”
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, October 19, 2009
 |
Haiti - Back to lifePublished: October 15, 2009Foreign Direct Investment(Read the original article here) The
violence, poverty and corruption that has blighted Haiti over the past
few years has given way to an air of peace, efficiency and optimism. Michael Deibert reports. Politically
aligned gangs warring across the ramshackle capital of shanty towns and
gingerbread houses are a thing of the past in Port-au-Prince, the
capital city of Haiti, and visitors cannot help but be struck by the
feeling of change in the air. An airport previously staffed by
political cronies, where passengers sweated in boiling halls, is now a
model of air-conditioned efficiency. Streets once deserted after sunset
now teem with life, with upper-class restaurants in the hillside
Petionville district and the kerosene-lit roadside stands of the ti machann (vendors) downtown luring customers late into the evening, something unthinkable only a few years ago. Peace
has been brought to this Caribbean country of 9 million people through
the work of president René Préval’s government, and the 9000-member
United Nations Stabilization Mission in Haiti, known as MINUSTAH. Haiti
was previously ruled by the erratic priest-turned-president
Jean-Bertrand Aristide from 2001 until his ousting in February 2004.
This was followed by turmoil under an interim government that ruled
until President Préval’s inauguration in May 2006. From a police
force of just 3500 at the start of Minustah’s mandate, Haiti now boasts
9200 police officers, a number projected to grow to 10,000 by the
year’s end, and to 14,000 by the end of 2011. Recent mid-term
parliamentary elections passed largely peacefully – no small feat in a
country where ballots often threatened civil order. In addition,
the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the Inter-American
Development Bank (IADB) collectively cancelled $1.2bn of Haiti’s debt
in June, erasing almost two-thirds of the country’s outstanding debt in
one stroke. The IADB went even further, approving an additional $120m
in grants to help Haiti improve its infrastructure, basic services and
disaster prevention plans. “Haiti has a lot of potential,” says
Michèle Pierre-Louis, the country’s prime minster and a respected civil
society leader before she joined President Préval’s government. “But we
have a very fragile civil society, and we’ve never thought of social
mobility and prepared for a middle class.” Positive outlookMany observers and investors feel a guarded optimism about the country’s political and economic prospects. “The
investment climate in Haiti is far better now than it was during the
[interim] period or the days of President Aristide, that can be said
without any doubt,” says Lance Durban, a US businessman who first
arrived in Haiti in 1979 and now runs Manutech, an electronics
manufacturing company employing about 450 people. “You’re close to the
US market, you have a lot of people who speak English and you have the
lowest wages in the Americas.” Last year, Haiti boasted
modest-though-respectable GDP growth of 2.3%, and at the beginning of
2009, President Préval created the Groupe de Travail sur la
Compétitivité, a body designed to increase Haiti’s competitiveness in
attracting global businesses. Beyond the manufacturing sector,
new avenues in Haiti’s potential for investors are also opening up. The
garment industry, once a lynchpin of Haiti’s economy, could help the
country’s economic revival, if given the right incentives and support.
In the US, the Haitian Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership
Encouragement Act of 2008 (HOPE II) built on a 2007 measure that
provided certain Haitian textiles with duty-free status when entering
the US. Mining is another area of interest (see In Focus, below). Tourism targetsAlso
on Haiti’s business landscape is the OTF Group, a competitiveness
consulting firm credited with breathing new life into Rwanda’s tourism,
coffee and agro-industry sectors following the genocide in the country
in 1994. OTF has found encouraging evidence that Haiti might be ripe
for a similar renaissance. “In terms of the business
opportunities, I am amazed by what I think is possible,” says OTF
director Rob Henning. “And our role is to facilitate a process by which
the Haitians, both the public and private sector, take ownership over
industries and try to create a prosperous Haiti where poverty is
reduced through wealth creation and the creation of businesses.” Though
Haiti currently ranks 154 out of the 180 countries covered by the World
Bank’s Doing Business Index, substantial improvement has been made in
cutting down the red tape that once made investing in the country an
inexplicable maze for foreign capital. It generally now takes a
maximum of 40 days to incorporate a company in Haiti, as opposed to the
202 days that it took as recently as 2003. However, the
challenges the country faces remain substantial. Weak infrastructure,
environmental degradation and deforestation contributed to conditions
which saw a trio of hurricanes kill at least 600 people in 2008. After
Haiti’s Senate passed a measure in May raising the country’s minimum
wage to a rate of about $4.90 a day, a 300% increase from its current
level, President Préval balked at signing the measure, fearing that it
would jeopardise Haiti’s already fragile employment sector. In unisonDespite this, however, Haiti’s business class and its poor majority have learned some hard lessons about working together. In
the once-violent Port-au-Prince neighbourhood of Saint Martin, member’s
of Haiti’s private sector and local community leaders have been meeting
with the support of the Irish charity Concern Worldwide since 2007. A
‘peace and prosperity’ committee in the district boasts three members
from Haiti’s private sector and 12 representatives from the community
of Saint Martin. A recent general assembly to address community
concerns attracted nearly 150 people. “You can no longer put a
business in a community where it is built against the community,” says
Ralph Edmond, the president of Farmatrix, which has manufactured
pharmaceutical products in the district since 1994, and who is active
in the debate. “If we are to live in this country, then we have to live
differently than our fathers did before.” COUNTRY PROFILEHAITI Population: 9.03 million Pop. growth rate: 1.84% Area: 27,560 sq km Real GDP growth: 1.3% GDP per capita: $1300 Current account: -$611m Largest sector (% of GDP): Agriculture 66% Labour force: 3.64 million Unemployment rate: na Source: CIA World Factbook, 2009 IN FOCUSMINING INDUSTRY TO STRIKE GOLD?Eurasian
Minerals, a Colorado-based mining company, in association with Newmont
Mining Corporation, has initiated exploratory prospecting procedures at
several sites in the north of Haiti, where there could be substantial
gold and copper deposits. In the neighbouring Dominican
Republic, the Pueblo Viejo gold deposit has proven to be one of the
largest in the Western Hemisphere, with proven and probable reserves of
570,000 kilograms of gold, 3.3 million kg of silver and 192 million kg
of copper. “Mining could represent a substantial investment in
the country, its economy and its infrastructure,” says Eurasian
Minerals CEO David Cole, noting the potential for “very large” gold
deposits in Haiti that have never been properly explored.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Sunday, October 11, 2009
 |
Challenges to Haiti’s Security Gains Saturday 10 October 2009 By Michael Deibert
Presented
to the Applied Research Center and the Latin American and Caribbean
Center at Florida International University in Miami, Florida, August
2009
(Read the original article here)
At
present, Haiti is passing through a delicate and significant period,
one which, while giving hints of hope, also provides ample grounds for
caution.
Though there have been significant and laudable
improvements in the country’s security situation under the mandate of
Haitian President René Préval, inaugurated in May 2006, these gains
remain fragile and Haiti’s political situation relatively tenuous, and
two stubbornly recurring factors of Haiti’s political life will have to
be addressed in order to concretize them.
Though he has been
criticized in some quarters for ineffectiveness, I believe that it is
hard to overstate the impact the restoration of relative peace around
the country since Mr. Préval took office has had on the life or
ordinary Haitians. Whereas only a few years ago the authority of the
state extended little even in the capital, Port-au-Prince, where entire
neighborhoods were held in the sway of various politically-affiliated
armed gangs, citizens of the capital, including those in poorer
quarters, can now largely go about their business without the
ever-present fear of being kidnapped or being caught in an exchange of
fire between the gangs, Haitian police and forces of the 9,000 member
Mission des Nations Unies pour la stabilisation en Haïti, known by its
acronym MINUSTAH.
Haiti’s long-crumbling road system is being
gradually rehabilitated, especially in the country’s south, and its
ever-erratic electricity situation has also improved somewhat. The
appointment of Michèle Pierre-Louis, a respected and independent-minded
civil society leader who formerly directed the Fondasyon Konesans Ak
Libète (Knowledge and Freedom Foundation or FOKAL), as Prime Minister
in September 2008, should also be viewed as a positive sign in a
country where the Prime Minister’s office, technically the head of
government according to Haiti’s 1987 constitution, has often meant
little more than a rubber stamp for the presidency.
On the
economic front, there has also been some good news, with the June
announcement by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the
the Inter-American Development Bank collectively canceling $1.2 billion
of Haiti’s debt, in one broad stroke erasing almost two-thirds of the
country’s outstanding debt. The latter institution went even further,
approving an additional $120 million in grants to aid Haiti in
improving sectors such as infrastructure, basic services and disaster
prevention. Also, in the United States, the Haitian
Hemispheric Opportunity through Partnership Encouragement Act of 2008
(HOPE II), with strong support in the U.S. congress, built yet further
on a 2007 measure that provided certain Haitian textiles with duty-free
status when entering the United States, perhaps a boon for Haiti’s long
near-moribund textile industry.
The amelioration of Haiti’s
security situation is, in my view, due to several factors, not the
least of which has been the steady and principled leadership of Mario
Andresol at the head of the Police Nationale d’Haiti (PNH), bringing
back competence and accountability to an institution that, during the
2001 to 2004 rule of Jean-Bertrand Aristide and to a lesser extent the
2004 to 2006 interim government that ruled Haiti before Mr. Préval’s
election, was viewed chiefly as a highly politicized bludgeon used by
Haiti’s executive branch against its enemies, real or perceived.
A projected five year UN-supported police reform program is now in its
third year of implementation, currently providing Haiti with 9,200
police officers, with that number projected to grow to 10,000 by year’s
end. For a police force that numbered only 3,500 at the start of the UN
mission (of whom over 1,500 had to be dismissed), the target of 14,000
police officers by the end of 2011 would not seem overly optimistic.
This surge in police recruits is a far cry from the situation between
September 2004 and June 2005, during which a PNH officer was being
murdered every five days in Haiti. On the judicial side of law
enforcement, Haiti has recently re-opened its school for magistrates
after being shuttered for many years.
However, there are some
structural problems to Haiti’s political culture that need to be
addressed if the calm that we have seen in Haiti over the least few
years is to be anything but cosmetic, and if a longer process of both
political and economic development can occur.
By now everyone
is no doubt familiar with the litany of woeful statistics that so often
get repeated about Haiti in gatherings like this: The fact that over 4
million of Haiti’s nearly 9 million people live on less than US$1 a
day, that only the people of Somalia and Afghanistan suffer from higher
rates of hunger, that 90 percent of Haiti’s tree cover has been
destroyed for charcoal and to make room for farming, resulting in
erosion that has destroyed two-thirds of the country’s arable farmland
and leaves it vulnerable to torrential floods such as those caused by a
trio of hurricanes that killed at least 600 people last year.
As already noted, some steps are being taken at an international level
to address Haiti’s economic woes and, though far from adequate, small
steps to try and address Haiti’s environmental disaster are being taken
by such indigenous groups as Tèt kole ti peyizan Ayisyen and the
Mouvman Peyizan Nasyonal Kongre Papay.
Despite this, though, I
believe that the two hard grains in Haiti’s political culture that must
be addressed, both by the Haitian government and by the international
community, if the changes I have outlined are to be anything more than
temporary. These grains are those of impunity and corruption, the
continuing presence of which have the ability to undermine all of the
progress that we have so far seen.
The guilty pleas this past
May of two Miami telecommunications executives, Juan Diaz and Antonio
Perez. in connection with their roles in a conspiracy to pay and
conceal more than $1 million in bribes to former Haitian officials
during the Aristide’s government’s tenure is a step in the right
direction, but it unfortunately has yet to be see reciprocal
prosecutions on the Haitian side for those who accepted the bribes.
Despite the ratification of the UN Convention against corruption by
Haiti’s parliament in 2007 and a vigorous speech about the problem of
corruption in Haiti by Préval in May of that year, as a Haitian friend
of mine recently told me, corruption is a low-risk, high-return
initiative in Haiti, one has every chance of becoming very rich, and
very little chance of being punished.
Going hand-in-hand with
a culture of corruption and impunity, historically in Haiti, armed
government loyalists with no formal law enforcement role have
essentially became contractors of the state, a phenomenon that held
true with the Tontons Macoutes of the 1957-1986 Duvalier family
dictatorship, the attaché of the 1991-1994 defacto era and the chimere
of Aristide’s 2001-2004 mandate. Under the aegis of the state, such
affiliated members, rewarded irregularly through various forms of
government largess, were allowed to exist as a competing armed group to
the official security forces, and given free reign to commit some
sickening crimes, such as the April 1994 killing of Aristide supporters
in the northern city of Gonaives and the February 2004 massacre of
Aristide opponents and civilians in the central Haitian town of St.
Marc, the latter a crime for which no one has as yet been tried.
Though this phenomenon, as far I can tell, is no longer present at the
heart of Haiti’s government today as it has been in the past, the aba/a-vie
option of mob politics remains an attractive one to many of Haiti’s
political and extra-political actors, as we saw with the riots of May
2008 and recent chaotic protests in favour of raising the country’s
minimum wage. Legitimate grievances can quickly be manipulated by those
seeking instability in Haiti for criminal or political gain.
Though there is a palpable difference now from the years of the second
Aristide government and the interim government, when police and
security services were objects of fear and distrust in the country and
brazen corruption existed at the very pinnacles of power, the Haitian
public now needs to feel that the police and judiciary are responsive
institutions, not simply commodities that, like so much in Haiti, are
for sale to the highest bidder and out of reach of the ordinary
citizens.
By my count, there have been 7 UN missions in Haiti
over the last 17 years, all of which had been requested by the Haitian
government in power at the time. There can be 7 more over the next 17
years, but I believe if these two core issues are not aggressively and
substantively addressed, the international community risks only
solidifying the already deep and decidedly deserved skepticism that
many Haitians have for the political process as it currently exists in
the country, as evidenced by recent feeble electoral participation, and
the institutions propped up by it, both local and foreign.
The
people of Haiti, and by this I mean the poor majority, need to feel
that they have some sort of stake in the kind of society that Haiti’s
politicians, business elite and the international community are trying
to create, because without the reality of a power structure that is
responsive to the needs of its citizens and transparent in its
governance, the window of opportunity that we are currently provided
with will shut rapidly, and those hoping for its closure, and along
with that continued drift and anarchy in Haiti’s political system, will
once again step into the void, to the detriment of Haiti and its people.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
 |
HAITI: "We Have Never Had Justice"
By Michael Deibert
Inter Press Service(Read the original article here)
ST. MARC, Jul 21, 2009 (IPS) - Amazil Jean-Baptiste remembers when they came to kill her son. "They
killed my boy and burned my boy," says Jean-Baptiste, a careworn
49-year-old who lives in a dilapidated structure without running water
in this bustling port town 80 kilometres north of Haiti's capital,
Port-au-Prince. "And I am still suffering."
It was February 2004, and Haiti was in the midst of a chaotic
rebellion against the government of President Jean-Bertrand Aristide.
North of St. Marc, a formerly loyal street gang known as the Cannibal
Army had risen up against the president and, joined by former members
of the country's disbanded army, proceeded to overrun police barracks
and seize control of towns throughout northern Haiti.
On Feb. 7, a lightly-armed anti-Aristide group, the Rassemblement
des militants conséquents de Saint-Marc (Ramicos), based in the
neighbourhood of La Scierie where Amazil Jean-Baptiste lived, took
advantage of the chaos to drive government forces from the town,
seizing the local police station, which they then set on fire.
Two days later, the combined forces of the Police Nationale de
Haiti (PNH), the Unité de Sécurité de la Garde du Palais National
(USGPN) and a local paramilitary organisation named Bale Wouze ("Clean
Sweep") retook much of the city. By Feb. 11, Bale Wouze - headed by a
former parliamentary representative of Aristide's Fanmi Lavalas
political party named Amanus Mayette- had commenced the battle to
retake the La Scierie.
What would follow would raise questions about Haiti's ability to
give justice to victims and punish the guilty that persist to this day. As
Amazil Jean-Baptiste returned home, she found her son, Kenol St.
Gilles, a 23-year-old carpenter with no political affiliation, groaning
with a bullet in each thigh. Taking him to the home of a local pastor
for aid, she watched as seven armed men, including three dressed in
police uniforms, accused St. Gilles of being a Ramicos militant who had
shot at them. He was dragged from the house, beaten unconscious and
thrown into a burning cement depot, where he died.
Residents of the town tell of other crimes - the decapitation of
unarmed Ramicos member Leroy Joseph, the killing of Ramicos
second-in-command Nixon François, the gang rape by Bale Wouze members
of a 21-year-old woman in the ruins of the burned-out commissariat -
that were allegedly committed during or immediately following the
recapture of St. Marc by pro-Aristide forces.
Witnesses recount how several people were slain and tossed into the
burning remnants of the Ramicos headquarters, while still others were
gunned down by police firing from a helicopter as they tried to flee
over a nearby mountain, Morne Calvaire.
"They came here and they massacred people," says resident Marc
Ariel Narcisse, 44. "A grenade thrown into my mother's house exploded,
and the house caught fire. My cousin, Bob Narcisse, was killed there."
Following those dark days, the victims of the St. Marc killings
formed the Association des Victimes du Génocide de la Scierie (AVIGES)
to advocate on their behalf. But their struggle has exposed the highly
politicised and often unresponsive nature of justice in Haiti, a
country struggling to build democratic institutions after decades of
dictatorship.
Links between armed pressure groups and the spheres of official power have long been a fact of political life here. Faustin Soulouque, who crowned himself emperor of Haiti in 1852, was supported by groups of impoverished partisans called zinglins,
while the Duvalier family dictatorship that ruled from 1957 until 1986
utilised the Tontons Macoutes, a murderous paramilitary band named
after a traditional Haitian boogeyman.
The government of Aristide, who returned to office in 2001 after
ruling the country for two periods in the 1990s, allied itself with his
own armed partisans, often referred to as chimere after a mythical fire-breathing demon.
Of these latter groups, Bale Wouze had a reputation as one of the
fiercest, and, by February 2004, its links with Haiti's National Palace
were largely indisputable, especially given the presence in St. Marc of
the USGPN, a unit directly responsible for the president's personal
security.
On Feb. 9, as St. Marc was retaken by government forces, and as
security forces and Bale Wouze members patrolled its streets together,
Aristide's prime minister, Yvon Neptune, also serving as the head of
the Conseil Superieur de la Police Nationale d'Haiti, flew into the
city, giving a press conference during which he stated that "the
national police force alone cannot re-establish order".
Witnesses in La Scierie describe how one of Bale Wouze's leading
members, a government employee named Ronald Dauphin, known to residents
as "Black Ronald", patrolled St. Marc in a police uniform, even though
he was in no way affiliated with the police.
When the author of this article visited St. Marc in February 2004,
shortly after Bale Wouze's raid into La Scierie, he interviewed USGPN
personnel and Bale Wouze members patrolling the city as a single armed
unit in tandem the PNH. A local priest told IPS matter-of-factly at the
time of Bale Wouze that, "These people don't make arrests, they kill."
Interviewed by the Miami Herald in St. Marc in February 2004,
Amanus Mayette was surrounded by Bale Wouze members and proclaimed his
affiliation with the organisation. "Amanus Mayette, Black
Ronald, Somoza, these people killed my son," Amazil Jean-Baptiste
explains in a trembling voice, listing the names of some of those who
she says took part in her son's slaying.
Following Aristide's overthrow later that month, several members of
Bale Wouze were lynched as they tried to flee St. Marc, while Yvon
Neptune turned himself over to the interim government that ruled Haiti
from March 2004 until the inauguration of President René Préval in May
2006.
Held in prison without trial until his May 2006 release on
humanitarian grounds, a May 2008 decision by the Inter-American Court
of Human Rights found the Haitian state had violated 11 separate
provisions of the American Convention on Human Rights in its detention
of Neptune, though stressing that it was "not a criminal court in which
the criminal responsibility of an individual can be examined".
After being jailed for three years without trial, former Bale Wouze
leader Amanus Mayette was freed from prison in April 2007. Arrested in
2004, Ronald Dauphin subsequently escaped from jail, and was
re-arrested during the course of an anti-kidnapping raid in Haiti's
capital in July 2006. Despite several chaotic public hearings, to date,
none of the accused for the killings in La Scierie has ever gone to
trial.
"In our system, the criminal becomes a victim because the system
doesn't work," laments Pierre Espérance, director of the Réseau
National de Défense des Droits Humains (RNDDH), which has pushed for
criminal prosecutions in the La Scierie case.
Espérance himself survived a 1999 assassination attempt for which no one was ever prosecuted. "But
historically, the authorities here are so involved in corruption and
human rights violations they feel very comfortable with impunity," he
says.
According to RNDDH figures, nearly 81 percent of Haiti's prisoners
are waiting for their cases to be heard before a judge, a situation
that some hope may be improved by the re-opening of Haiti's school for
magistrates, which recently renewed activities after being shuttered
for many years.
Frustratingly for the people of St. Marc, however, the events of
February 2004 have become a political football among Haiti's various
political actors. The United Nations independent expert on human
rights in Haiti, Louis Joinet, in a 2005 statement dismissed
allegations of a massacre and described what occurred as "a clash", a
characterisation that seemed unaware of the fact that not all among
those victimised had any affiliation with Haiti's political opposition.
Conversely, a member of a Human Rights Watch delegation that
visited St. Marc a month after the killings concluded that at least 27
people had been murdered by pro-government forces between Feb. 11 and
Aristide's flight into exile.
Their claims are treated with shrugging indifference by the Préval
government and the United Nations, and the people of La Scierie appear
to be resigned that their struggle for justice will be a long, though
hopefully not fruitless, one.
"We need justice, we demand justice, because we have never had
justice," says Amazil Jean-Baptiste, as another member of AVIGES stands
nearby, wearing a t-shirt reading 'We won't forget 11 February 2004' in
Haiti's native Kreyol language.
"I just want justice for my son," she says.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
 |
Sunday, July 19, 2009
Tentative calm brings optimism to a 'failed' Haiti
Michael Deibert
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
(Read the original article here)
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Haiti | The dark afternoon clouds that gradually roll
over Haiti's capital herald the beginning of the rainy season, but the
early-morning bursts of sunshine might more accurately capture the
national mood these days.
While the country remains desperately poor, it is more peaceful than it
has been in years - no small feat in a place with a volatile political
history. Some of the credit goes to the United Nations and President
Rene Preval.
A few years ago, the authority of the state did not extend much beyond
Port-au-Prince, where armed gangs controlled neighborhoods. Since the
inauguration of Mr. Preval in May 2006, however, a fragile calm has
prevailed.
The capital's boisterous population again feels safe enough to
patronize downtown bars and kerosine-lit roadside stands late into the
evening. Billboards that once extolled the infallibility of a
succession of "maximum leaders" now carry messages about the importance
of respect between the population and the police as well as decry
discrimination against the disabled.
Ruled by priest-turned-president Jean-Bertrand Aristide twice in the
1990s and from 2001 until his ouster in February 2004, Haiti saw
violent urban warfare between heavily armed Aristide partisans and
security forces, who inflicted collective punishment under an interim
government in power from 2004 until Mr. Preval's inauguration.
Working with a 9,000-member U.N. peacekeeping mission, known by the
acronym MINUSTAH, Haiti's government has made great strides in recent
months in professionalizing security forces that were historically
brutal and corrupt.
"The capacity of the police has improved quite significantly ... and
the image of the police has begun to change within the society," says
Hedi Annabi, a Tunisian diplomat who heads MINUSTAH.
"The level of respect for basic freedoms, such as freedom of the press, is at a historically remarkable level," he said.
In addition, according to MINUSTAH, the number of kidnappings has
fallen dramatically, from more than 500 in 2006 to about 50 during the
first six months of this year.
A projected five-year U.N.-supported police-reform program is in its
third year of implementation, providing Haiti with 9,200 police
officers - a number projected to grow to 10,000 by the end of this year
and to 14,000 by the end of 2011.
The force began with only 3,500, of whom more than 1,500 had to be dismissed for poor conduct.
The surge in police recruits is a far cry from the situation that
existed between September 2004 and June 2005, during which a police
officer was killed every five days, according to U.N. statistics.
Some observers here credit the leadership of Michele Duvivier
Pierre-Louis, a respected civil society activist, who was appointed
prime minister in September 2008.
Ms. Pierre-Louis lauds the U.N. mission, which is heavily Latin American, for helping to stabilize the country.
"It's a new paradigm for regional cooperation," she told The Washington
Times. "They have their own interests, of course, but let's make the
best of the opportunities that are offered to us."
In a country where voting has sometimes boded ill for civil order,
midterm elections in April, with a runoff in June, for Haiti's Senate
were poorly attended but largely peaceful, with poll workers and
observers directing voters and tabulating votes in a professional
fashion. The desultory participation, however, led Mr. Preval to warn
that Haiti's "political class should wonder about this abstention" as
he cast his own ballot at a Port-au-Prince school.
Haiti still faces massive challenges. Largely deforested, the country
was battered by Hurricanes Hanna and Ike in 2008, which collectively
killed at least 600 people.
Beyond the capital, after the shabby-chic resorts on the Cote des
Arcadins, Haiti's Route Nationale 1 is a pot-holed, crumbling wreck
long before it reaches the northern cities of Gonaives and Cap-Haitien.
Poverty and the scramble to find basic necessities remain a constant
fact of life for the majority of the 8.5 million population. The social
peace that has been restored is fragile and could easily fray if
tangible gains are not seen in the day-to-day lives of Haitians.
One exception to the national calm are noisy and occasionally violent
demonstrations by university students and other political pressure
groups in the capital.
Haiti's Senate voted in May to support a law raising the minimum wage
to about $4.90 per day, a 300 percent increase. Mr. Preval has not
signed the measure, citing his fear that it would jeopardize Haiti's
already fragile employment sector. In response, students have held
regular protests, during which dozens of cars have been burned and
protesters have squared off against U.N. troops and Haitian security
forces. Two demonstrators have been killed.
"They chose not to listen to us, and we were obligated to peacefully
mobilize about our concerns and the question about the minimum salary,"
said Beneche Martial, a student at the state university's medical
school.
Nevertheless, there is a tenuous hopefulness here for the first time in many years.
In June, the Inter-American Development Bank approved $120 million in
grants for 2010 to help Haiti improve infrastructure, basic services
and disaster prevention.
Also last month, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and
the Inter-American Development Bank collectively canceled $1.2 billion
owed to them by Haiti, erasing almost two-thirds of the country's
outstanding debt.
The scourge of HIV/AIDS is also diminishing, with the rate of infection
among pregnant women halved from 6.2 percent in 1993 to 3.1 percent,
according to the U.N.
A U.N. report in December suggested that revived garment production
might point the way for economic revival, saying that "it is striking
how modest are the impediments to competitiveness, relative to the huge
opportunities offered by the fundamentals" in the country.
For a nation viewed as a potential "failed state" not long ago, such news cannot help but be encouraging.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 08, 2009
 |
HAITI: Deportees from U.S. Face Culture Shock, Retain Hope
By Michael Deibert
Inter Press Service http://www.ipsnews.net/news...asp?idnews=47589
PORT-AU-PRINCE, Jul 8, 2009 (IPS) - In the shadow of the Eglise
Sainte Claire in the Petite Place Cazeau neighbourhood of Haiti’s
bustling capital, Frantz Saintil is visiting his daughter and
reflecting on the more than two decades he spent abroad before finding
himself back in his native country of Haiti seven years ago.
"It didn’t take me long to become very Americanised," says Saintil,
34, who left Haiti for Canada and eventually the United States with his
family when he was six years old. "I like baseball and apple pie
and everything American. I didn’t want to be identified as Haitian and
discriminated against. I didn’t understand their way of dress, their
musical preferences. I was more into rock, some R&B, country music.
I didn’t identify with them at all."
Saintil is one of 3,250 Haitians that Department of Homeland
Security figures show were deported from the United States back to
Haiti on the basis of criminal convictions between 1997 and 2005. A
soft-spoken man who was a permanent legal resident when a nolo
contendere ("no contest") plea to an assault charge in Colorado landed
him in prison at 19, after serving his sentence Saintil was
subsequently deported to Haiti, a country he barely knew.
"When you don’t identify yourself as an immigrant or a foreigner,
it’s when you get in trouble that all these things come to fruition,"
says Saintil of his experience with the U.S. justice system, speaking a
measured, American-accented English in contrast to the boisterous
Kreyol being shouted at a nearby football match.
"When you realise that you’re detained to be deported, then you
start to identify (as Haitian), at that point you can’t deny it," he
said. Saintil is not alone. A recent study by the 15-member
Caribbean Community (CARICOM) found, upon analysing deportation data
from Guyana, Jamaica, and Trinidad and Tobago, that almost 30,000
criminal offenders had been deported to those countries between 1990
and 2005.
Even more strikingly, according to migration data in El Salvador,
between 2006 and 2008 some 14,608 deportees with criminal records were
sent back from the U.S. to the Central American country of 7 million,
home to such transnational criminal syndicates as the Mara Salvatrucha
and a nation with one of the world’s highest homicide rates.
It is thus a delicate issue, with deportees who have left their
birth countries at very young ages - and having become culturally and
linguistically American - being digested through the U.S. prison system
and then spit out to their familial homelands only to confront a wall
of mutual misunderstanding.
According to figures supplied by the Centre Oecuménique des Droits
de l'Homme (the Ecumenical Centre for Human Rights or CEDH), a Haitian
human rights group, the average age of deportees when they left Haiti
was between four and seven years old.
Having become assimilated in the United States, deportees suffered
severe culture shock when returning to Haiti, where a lifestyle
unfamiliar to most is expressed in a language that only a few had been
able to master with any degree of proficiency while abroad.
"What we request from the authorities of Canada and the U.S. is to
take into account the family factor when considering the nature of the
delinquency which leads to the decision of deportation," says CEDH’s
director, Jean-Claude Bajeux. "And it is essential that the governments
involved in a policy of returning people to Haiti make an evaluation of
the precarious situation in this country."
Add to the mix Haiti's dire economic condition - with 80 percent of
the population living under the poverty line and GDP per capita of just
1,300 dollars per year - and periodic political unrest that sees
politicians only too willing to use pools of jobless young men as
muscle in the country’s political wars, one quickly sees how the
deportees, or dp’s, as they call themselves, marked with the stigma of
forced exit from a country that many Haitians regard as the promised
land, have a tough row to hoe once they step off the plane in
Port-au-Prince.
In December 2006, for example, with no hard evidence supporting his
claim, then-Prime Minister Jacques Edouard Alexis blamed deportees from
the U.S. for helping to spur the country's at-the-time spiraling
kidnapping rates. The fearsome reputation of such gangs as Florida’s
Zoe Pound, a Haitian-identified clique that specialises in robbing drug
dealers of their product and money, often with extreme violence, only
adds to the trepidation with which local Haitians view the deportees.
It is a reputation that some among their number feel is undeserved. "If
there was a way to integrate us into society, it wouldn’t be such a
hardship on us," says Junior Telusca, who moved with his family to
Florida at age three and was returned to Haiti after doing two years in
prison on a drug conviction. "There’s only one thing I want, and that’s
to integrate into this society, to get a job, pay for my child’s school
and live my life."
Deportees often mix a certain wistfulness for the land they have
been exiled from with a stated desire to try and gain some sort of
advantage, both spiritual and material, from their particular status.
In recent years, local organisations such as the Fondation haïtienne
des familles des rapatriés have attempted to build some sort of
solidarity among the newly-returned.
In tandem with Haiti's Ministry of Social Affairs and Ministry of
Interior, the International Organisation for Migration has recently
developed a program focusing on deportee reintegration into Haitian
society that focuses on such aspects as micro-enterprise support and
language training.
But for many, it has been anything but an easy lesson. "Life
in the States is great, in all senses of the word," says Frantz
Saintil. "But if you get a second chance to be free, then you’ve got to
make the best of it. If I can affect the life of even one person, even
it is by teaching them English, to me that is a big step. There is no
telling what that person might become."
"And I am hopeful that one day I will get to see the United States again," he added. Michael Deibert is the author of Notes from the Last Testament: The Struggle for Haiti (Seven Stories Press).
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, July 04, 2009
 |
Manufactured diversity
Published: June 12, 2009
Foreign Direct Investment The economies of north Africa’s Maghreb region – Algeria, Libya, Morocco and Tunisia – are branching out into manufacturing as the demand for hydrocarbon exports continues to decline, writes Michael Deibert.
A ribbon of countries along Africa’s northern expanse have begun to make their mark on the world’s manufacturing landscape. It is a development occurring at the same time that the export value of the region’s hydrocarbon exports has taken a dip. Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia – often collectively referred to as the Maghreb (meaning ‘place of sunset’) – along with Libya have a combined population of 84 million people. They have all proved adept at attracting a combination of transportation and electronics manufacturers, a development that could significantly diversify the region’s economy and opportunities for foreign investment. Read the full article here.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, July 04, 2009
 |
Q&A: "The Elites Are Like a Huge Elephant Sitting on Haiti"
Michael Deibert interviews Haitian Prime Minister MICHÈLE PIERRE-LOUIS
Inter Press ServicePORT-AU-PRINCE, Jul 3, 2009 (IPS) - Haitian Prime Minister Michèle Pierre-Louis assumed office in September 2008. Born in the southern city of Jérémie in 1947, she left Haiti with her family in 1964 following a pogrom by dictator François Duvalier against his perceived enemies in her town. Studying in the United States and France before returning to Haiti in 1977, she has been a close confidante of Haitian President René Préval for over 40 years. After having worked in a variety of private and public sector jobs in Haiti, she and Préval opened a bakery which catered to the poor in Haiti’s capital in 1982. Active in the first government of Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Pierre-Louis was among the first to denounce the 1991 military coup against Aristide during an interview with Radio France Internationale. After Aristide’s return by a U.S.-led multinational force in 1994, Pierre-Louis opened the Fondasyon Konesans Ak Libète (Knowledge and Freedom Foundation or FOKAL) in 1995 with support from businessman and philanthropist George Soros’ Open Society Institute. An organisation conceived to support sectors in Haitian society most likely to bring about social change, FOKAL has been responsible for the creation of a network of over 50 community libraries throughout Haiti, a cultural centre and library for economically disadvantaged children and youths in Haiti’s capital, a debate programme for young people, and an initiative to supply running water to the nearly 80 percent of Haitians who don’t have regular access to it. Since her installation as Prime Minister, Pierre-Louis has presided over a stabilising of the security situation in this often politically unstable country, weathered the fallout and relief efforts after a trio of hurricanes killed at least 600 people last year and traveled both within Haiti and internationally to plead her government’s case. IPS contributor Michael Deibert sat down with Prime Minster Pierre-Louis in Port-au-Prince on Jun. 21 to hear her thoughts about where the country is heading. Read the full interview here.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|