MySpace


Media For Animal Liberation



Last Updated: 11/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 25
Sign: Scorpio

City: TONASKET
State: Washington
Country: US
Signup Date: 10/10/2008

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Monday, August 10, 2009 

Category: Blogging
We are so disconnected from the reality of the animal enterprise industry that most people never would guess, for example, that the vast majority of chicken-flesh or cow-flesh they consume is female, not male.

Of course, this begs the inquiry, where do all the males go?

Males in such factory farming are generally murdered at a very young age. These males are murdered as babies because people buy eggs and milk. Why do the purchases of eggs and milk cause their murder?

The reason why eggs causes murder and why milk causes murder is twofold.

First, to the animal enterprise industry, nonhuman animals are not animals, they are property. Second, to the animal enterprise industry, nonhuman animals are property which are used and sold to make profit. To those who support animal rights, what is done against these nonhuman animals violates the rights that all animals share and incurs suffering, exploitation, and murder. To the animal enterprise industry, what is done against these nonhuman animals is simply good, smart business that reduces expenses and maximizes profits from their property.

In the animal enterprise industry, a 1:1 gender ratio in the population is not desirable because it is not cost effective. Most animal flesh that people consume from grocery stores is female. To the animal enterprise, females are the most profitable gender, and males the least profitable gender. You only need a relatively few males in a population in order to generate more "commodities". In contrast, females' reproductive organs can be exploited daily to "generate" dairy or eggs, to "generate" future "meat", and, when the female is it as a desirable weight, to also be butchered into parts for "meat". The female gender is the most profitable gender to raise and exploit. In the factory farming system, while males infrequently live past infancy, females generally are slaughtered as adolescents (a.k.a. teenagers). The reason for the young age is wholly due to being their size and it being the most cost effective age to kill them.

In the case of chickens, the female chicken has her life exploited, her reproductive organs exploited for eggs, her children exploited, and her own death exploited. The female chicken is a more profitable "investment" than a male chicken. As newly born chicks, males are nearly all immediately doomed to to have their necks broken or to be thrown into grinders. Male chickens do not give birth to new chickens. Male chickens do not lay eggs. This is why male chicks are murdered. They aren't profitable to as raise.

In the case of bovines (cows), the female also has her life exploited, her reproductive organs exploited for milk, her children exploited, and her own death is also exploited. Male calves, unlike male chicks, are not always nearly immediately slaughtered after birth. Instead, male calves are chained to the floor, not allowed to move, fed purposefully nutrient deficient diets, and then killed to have their death exploited and parts butchered to "become" the "delicacy" known as "veal". Male calves cannot be milked. Male calves do not give birth to new calves. This is why they are butchered as calves. They aren't profitable to raise beyond that age.

Now, lets imagine if everyone didn't eat animal flesh, but did eat dairy & eggs:

If people didn't eat chickens or didn't eat cows, male chicks and male calves would still be murdered for the exactly same reason they are murdered now: they aren't profitable to exploit. To the animal enterprise, male chicks and male calves are property which cannot generate as much profitable commodities as their female counterparts can.

In such a hypothetical world, like our own world, you still don't need 1:1 existence of males and females, and, in fact, such a ratio is highly unprofitable to maintain. It would be too costly to be supporting so many males which cannot be exploited for milk or eggs. EVEN if people didn't eat animal flesh, farm animals would still be murdered on a regular basis for the sake of profit.

Exploitation cannot be made to respect the exploited group. It is a complete contradiction in terms. Respect means that we recognize their own desires and interests. Respect means we recognize that their suffering and pain is as real and painful as our own. Respect means we recognize that they aren't property nor commodities but sentient beings, fellow earthlings which share this world with us, and who exist to pursue their own purposes, not for our purposes. Exploitation begins where respect and compassion ends.

This is why, for example, "cage-free" and "cruelty-free" eggs simply come from overcrowded closed barns. This is why, like with "caged eggs", "cage-free" chicks' beaks are still melted off. This is why the male chicks and male calves are still killed. This is why farm animals still suffer almost all of the same inflictions under "ethical" exploitation as they do under "unethical" exploitation.

While vegetarians certainly reduce the demand for meat, even a vegetarian world would still murder animals for the sake of things which are not necessary for sustenance. Even in a vegetarian world, animals would still be murdered for the sake of profit alone. The reason is because animals would still be treated as property.

The impossible myth of "ethical" exploitation and "ethical" murdering of other animals is born more out of desperation to alleviate our own feelings of discomfort.

In the same way, when slavery of people was still legal in the US, there were pro-slavery advocates calling for "slave welfare" legislation. We forget that there were pro-slavery advocates calling for "benevolent" slavery. We forget that there were pro-slavery advocates who called for slavemasters to show more compassion and also to give their slaves better living conditions. And, if slavery of people were still legal today in the US, I guarantee you that there would be pro-slavery people calling for "humane" slavery.

No amount of slave reform legislation could end the injustice, cruelty, and suffering of slavery. The only thing that could end it was the abolishment of slavery of people itself.

As long as any sentient being is considered "property", it will always be the interests and rights of the "owner" which prevail the most.

History also teaches us that quite well.

And, despite the numerous contributions which Thomas Jefferson may have done, his opposition to slavery and yet, at the same time, his owning of slaves himself remains as a smear upon his integrity. Others, meanwhile, who refused to own slaves, refused to support slavery as an institution by their choices, and those who advocated against it through words and/or actions, in contrast, are vindicated by history for their uncompromisable stances.

Veganism is such an uncompromisable stance of respect.

Veganism requires us to consciously works towards helping society to recognize other animals as not as property but as sentient beings who share this planet with us. Respecting other animals means that we must consciously work towards abolishing the social and legal concept of them to be "property".

As long we regard other animals as the property of humans, we will always exploit them, we will always inflict cruelty and suffering upon them, and, yes, we will always also murder them.

Make your own media. Media shapes views. Views shape choices. 

(Don't forget to subscribe to Media for Animal Liberation's Youtube Channel or to check out longer videos at Media for Animal Liberation on Vimeo. Media for Animal Liberation now also has a wordpress blog)

If you want to repost this, feel free to do so. I'll appreciate it, of course, if you link it back to me.

Currently reading:
Making A Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights
By Bob Torres
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 

Category: Blogging
"When you know that the creatures on your tray come, struggling and squealing, from the chopping block, then you are making their extreme anguish your greatest delight." - the Srimad Bhagavatam, "(Buddha) Against Animal Sacrifice", 964 - 1032 AD

Animals are not voiceless. Not only are humans animals themselves, but other animals also have voices too. In fact, most animals can communicate things which cross many specie barriers, including the one with humans. You do not need to be a cow, a pig, a chicken, a dog, or a mink in order to understand the content and meaning of screams of terror or the wailings of anguish. 

When other animals are beaten, incarcerated, tortured, made to suffer, being slaughtered, and watching/smelling/hearing their kin being slaughtered, and imminently expecting their own slaughter to come, their voices and meanings communicated are absolutely clear.

Some might argue that I am speaking too literally, but I aim to speak respectfully.  I do not make this argument to bring conflict, but to bring reflection:

There is a common phrase by some (good-intentioned and respectable) animal rights activists that they are the voice for the voiceless. The phrase sounds nice, but I disagree with the unintended, unavoidable implications of such a phrase. Just because nonhuman animals are not represented in humans' political systems, do not speak humans' language, and cannot participate in humans' political systems, I do not think this means we should call them voiceless.

Why is this important? Language shapes how we think. Numerous thinkers, research & studies, thinktanks, politicians, and social justice movements recognize this reality. When we have a language that, for example, has nearly positive-only slang for promiscuous men and hundreds of negative and degrading slang for promiscuous women, it has very real impacts how the society thinks and thus behaves.

It is not a coincidence that perhaps among the most negative, most devaluing, most objectifying, most cruel, and most degrading remarks in our language is language that debases other animals. So much so that most humans rarely use the word "animal" to encompass humans as they would consider this to be offensive -- despite the biological reality and fact that humans are one of many types of animals. At the same time as seeing the word "animal" and "bestial" to denote absolutely negative behavior, humans use the word "humane" to be the opposite. This despite also that the animal which has shown to have the potential to be the most violent, destructive, cruel, apathetic, and disturbed of all animals is the animal called human. Likewise, the very word "humane" disregards and ignores that self-sacrificing, compassionate, and/or social behavior is observable throughout the rest of the animal kingdom -- not just humans.

What is the inadvertent message of saying that we are the "voice for the voiceless"? The inadvertent message is that the only legitimate voice is a human voice. It ignores the voices of nonhumans. It inadvertently, unintentionally feeds the language which values everything exclusively to humans only, which claims that human might makes it right for everything and everyone else to be subjugated to the will of humans and which claims that it is right that literally everything and everyone else exists as property of humans.

The natural rights for nonhumans to be born free, to live free, and to die free, to have self-sovereignty over their own lives, and to exist for their own purposes are rights which all animals deserve for their own sakes, not our sakes. These are rights which we seek to restore. These are rights which we humans have robbed from other animals. We do not fight to give rights to other animals, but to restore the rights to other animals which we humans have robbed from them.

By saying instead that we are the voice for the silenced, the voice for the muted, or the voice for the ignored, it recognizes the reality and legitimacy of other animals' voices and interests while it also recognizes that it is our responsibility to use our voices to fight for their natural rights to be free and to exist for their own purposes.

We must avoid myopic humans-are-the-center-of-the-universe- and-all-reality thinking which claims that everything and everyone else only exists for the purpose of humans, and that nothing could possibly exist for any other purpose beyond for use by humans. It is this same thinking which views other animals to be "property" of humans -- and it is this type of thinking which severely objectifies other animals and "legally" excuses astounding cruelty and endless exploitation done against them.

Now, by saying we are "voices for the silenced" or "voices for the muted" instead, we aren't suggesting that their voices aren't legitimate or meaningful because they aren't human, we are then also recognizing that they have voices of their own, this also emphasizes that they have wills of their own, this also emphasizes their voices and interests aren't being heard, addressed, or considered, and lastly this calls to us to the action of using our voices for them.

The reason that their voices aren't heard and that their voices are muted is that many human cultures are psychologically deaf to the voices (and interests) of other animals. To most of these humans, the screams and wailings of other animals is merely unpleasant noise. They have been raised to be psychologically deaf. Consequently, they do not recognize that what they are hearing is not meaningless noise, but voices. Also, we must remember that 99% of people in this society are so physically remote from what their money and choices support that the full reality and full meaning of their choices and its consequences is obscured, fragmented, and disconnected.

There is an invisibility, a fog, and a silence that obscures the cruelty and injustice done against other animals on an incomprehensible daily scale. It is through psychological or cultural muting and also physical distance or remoteness from the "other" that voices, interests, and injustices are silenced and obscured. It is precisely such obscuring and silencing which is the keystone that holds together all oppressions and all injustices.

And it is here where we come in. We must act as voices speaking on behalf of nonhumans. We must use our voices, not as their rulers or as their masters, but as their messengers. We must use our voices, create our own media, and use the media because the voices of nonhumans are silenced, muted, and ignored. The voices of nonhumans forced to confinement, suffering, exploitation, and slaughter do not physically reach the ears of 99% of the population. The population surrounding every one of us, on the other hand, can physically hear our voices and witness our media.

Almost one thousand years now after the opening quote that began this post, the muting and deafness to the anguish of other animals continues, but it is also now being challenged globally, in numbers that history has never seen before, and in ways that haven't been done before in history.

In other words, it might not always seem like it, but changes are happening.

VIDEO: Vegan Outreach: Simon Blowtorches a Dog for Fun (Contains NO Graphic Footage)



(Don't forget to subscribe to Media for Animal Liberation's Youtube Channel or to check out longer videos at Media for Animal Liberation on Vimeo)

PS: An excellent book on the power of language is The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory By Carol J. Adams. This book should be a part of every vegan and animal rights activist's library and/or reading list.

Post by Media for Animal Liberation. Feel free to repost elsewhere.

DISCLAIMER: I have absolutely no ill feelings or intent towards the musician Maria Daines (a.k.a. "Voice for the Voiceless") who has done work on behalf animals. I don't support the phrase "voice for the voiceless", but Maria Daines herself is a good person. Do show her love and support.
Currently reading:
The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory
By Carol J. Adams
Tuesday, April 14, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
*A Polish translation of this is available:
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=134688338&blogId=490665227

In response to the classic responses that animals exist to be killed and eaten and that animals are made out of meat...


The world is inhabited by animals. We are animals. This is among one of the first facts that most people forget from their biology class.

So, since we are animals, does this mean that we should imprison, exploit, slaughter, and eat each other?

Being more powerful than other animals doesn't mean that we are no longer animals.

Evolution didn't shape any animal to be the property of other animals. Evolution didn't shape animals to be born into captivity, exploited in captivity, and slaughtered in captivity. Biologically, all animals are shaped to be born free, to live free, and to die free. Every animal, including ourselves, has evolved to pursue for their own motives and to pursue those motives on their own terms.

For 99% of our ancestors' evolution, we were the prey animal. We, like all animals, are, after all, "made" of "meat".

The practice of hunting isn't something we are biologically evolved to do instinctively, but something that we culturally developed the skills and tools to do. Without extensive training/mentoring and tools at every stage of hunting and/or consuming meat, we cannot pull it off. Hunting isn't encoded in our biological instincts.

Now, this belief that if Group A is more powerful than Group B, the more powerful Group A has a legitimate right to force and coerce Group B to exist to be used and serve the more powerful Group A's interests is the same belief that says women exist to be the handmaid, trophy, property of men, the same belief that says blacks exist to be the slaves of whites, and is the same belief that says that other animals exist to be used by us and to serve our own interests and should, like women or slaves, be literally, legally regarded as property.

To put it simply, it is the belief that might makes right.

I don't want to support a world that believes that. It is not that I think I am superior than other people, it is that I don't think a claim of being superior justifies disrespecting the sovereignty of others and that I don't think a claim to superiority means I am justified in disrespecting and reducing anyone or any other animal to be regarded as a mere object for me to use for my own interest.

It is a choice between might makes right versus respect.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Thought Piece Posted By: "Media for Animal Liberation"

Peaceable Kingdom - Former Farmers & Ranchers


(Vegan Outreach) Simon Blowtorches a Dog for Fun


MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/xmfalx
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/xMFALx
---------------------------------------------------------------
Currently watching:
The Witness: A Tribe of Heart Documentary
Release date: 2004-02-28
Saturday, February 07, 2009 

People such as this negative99 ( http://negative99.com/politics/something-is-wrong-with-vegans/ ) fellow aren't open to a real discussion or a real argument about veganism or animal rights

They start out with the prejudgment that veganism is absurd before they really know anything whatsoever about it and then seek to confirm their prejudgment by producing the most ridiculously construed arguments against veganism possible that they can think of.

Sometimes, we naively think that if people knew the facts and the truth, everyone would convert. The problem with this assumption is that it would state that we are rational animals. We aren't. We are *rationalizing* animals. By understanding that people aren't rational, but rationalizing, it can help us better understand how to respond to ridiculous counterarguments aimed at veganism and also how to better communicate the ideas behind veganism.

I recommend the below well-written piece partly about this and other such things:

http://michaelbluejay.com/veg/natural.html


Tuesday, January 20, 2009 

Category: News and Politics
Below is a video I came across of animals that were liberated from a zoo in Lima, Peru.

From a life in captivity, denied from fulfilling what their lives are meant/evolved to be, confined for the trivial enjoyment of human amusement, their sanctity of life reduced to being merely gazed at by bored or generally apathetic spectators, they now are free and have the right that all life deserves, the right to life, the right to liberty, and the right to pursue happiness...



http://www.directaction.info/news_dec02_08.htm
"PUBLIC COMMUNIQUE

Lima, November 21, 2008.

Individuals for Animal Liberation.

To the civilian community, visual and written press, environmental groups and collectives and individuals that fight for the abolition of Animal, Human and Earth exploitation, we declare the following:
• On Friday, November 21 of this year, in the early morning hours, we carried out a direct action and rescue for Animal Liberation in the Parque Zoológico Huachipa, located in the city of Lima at Km. 9.5 on the central highway in Peru.
• Our actions were directed at smashing animal exploitation, our efforts focused on the direct action of releasing animals and returning them to their natural habitat.
• We consider it necessary to explain what our action consisted of, due to the blockage of information by the Zoo and the news media that have focused all their attention on the APEC meeting in Lima. We entered between Thursday night and the early hours of Friday morning. We cut and opened more than thirty cages
for birds of different species, managing to free more than 50 birds, including Toucans, Owls and other tropical birds and indigenous species of Peru. We also climbed to the top of the mega cage for birds that has been an animal prison, sabotaging its structure with the hope that birds such as parrots, macaws, pigeons, doves, toucans, and white herons locked up in this mega-aviary could find an exit from this life of imprisonment and fly free. Afterwards we were prepared for the most important part of the action, to carry two jungle cats, ocelots, in cages specially suited to them, and to transfer them to their natural habitat; these animals were transported and later released into wild space, the ecosystem of the low jungle of Peru, in order to give them the possibility of a free life far from the harassing looks of tourists, consumers of animal exploitation.
• We believe it necessary to mention and to denounce animal traffickers and zoos and other responsible parties acting as accomplices of state institutions, acquiring animals from the hands of vile traffickers that find no better business than to imprison these free beings in small spaces like those of the animals we freed. These animals were in small cages, groups of up to eight birds per cage, without the ability to fly or interact freely, they were found with clear symptoms of stress caused by the overcrowding, proximity to their natural predators and lack of sunlight. Many of the animals that we freed were found in an area that was off-limits to visitors of the zoo, that was not even on the map of the park, imprisoned in tents, without sunlight and without sufficient space needed to spread out naturally.
• We denounce as well the imprisonment of rodents, turtles, birds and other small animals in plastic containers with the purpose of serving as food for other species; those we found spinning in circles, typical behavior of animals with nervous disorders caused by confinement, the vast majority waiting for utilization later, demonstrating the falsehood and double talk of the companies that work as alleged institutions of preservation and species conservation, who are truly companies of animal exploitation, always operating with speciesist disregard for the interests of the individuals of other species.
• We also denounce the conditions in which the felines that we released were found; they were located in cages of no more than two square meters, side by side, preventing their free exercise of interests and abilities, destroying their instincts and subjecting their wild nature to the egotistic interests of executives who disguise their business of exploitation as conservation. A claim that we denounce as false, due to the conditions of which we were witnesses to when entering this mega animal prison, where animals supposedly in recuperation were kept locked up for display later as objects of entertainment.
• We want to make a call to all collectives and individuals who struggle and are active for Animal, Human and Earth Liberation to act directly towards achieving total liberation, taking into account the interests of those captured under the exploitative hands of owners of zoos, bullfights, animal breeders, the fur industry, meat industry, circuses with animals and an endless number of places of animal exploitation and death; take the necessary security measures, to ensure safe liberations as much for activists as for people not responsible for this imprisonment, like the wage earners in these capitalist companies, also victims of exploitation.
• We want to emphasize as well that liberation through direct action is something we can all be a part of, we do not need special training nor to be part of any organization, just to act with a couple of tools and an attitude open to taking risks in pursuit of the elimination of speciesism and Animal, Human and Earth exploitation, being always clear that race, sex, color, level of intelligence, language, sexual orientation, or in this case species, are not indicators of superiority or inferiority, but individual characteristics. Individuals are deserving of respect on the basis of their own desires and interests, advancing our ethics to a true unfolding of solidarity and egalitarianism.

For Animal, Human and Earth Liberation.

INDIVIDUALS FOR ANIMAL LIBERATION

Until we are all free..."

Original Spanish:
"COMUNICADO PÚBLICO

Lima, 21 de Noviembre del 2008.

Individualidades por la Liberación Animal.

A la comunidad civil, prensa visual y escrita, grupos ecologistas y colectivos e individualidades que luchan por la abolición de la explotación Animal, Humana y de la Tierra, declaramos lo siguiente:
• Que el día viernes 21 de noviembre del presente año, en horas de la madrugada, efectuamos una acción directa y rescate por la Liberación Animal en el Parque Zoológico de Huachipa, ubicado en la ciudad de lima en el Km. 9.5 de la carretera central, en Perú.
• Que nuestro accionar esta dirigido a romper con la explotación animal, enfocando nuestros esfuerzos en la acción directa de liberarles y reintegrarlos a su hábitat natural.
• Consideramos necesario poder explicar en que consistió nuestra acción debido al bloqueo informativo dispuesto por el Zoológico y los medios de prensa que han enfocado toda su atención en la reunión de la APEC en Lima. Hicimos ingreso al lugar entre la noche del día Jueves y la madrugada del día viernes, cortamos y abrimos mas de una treintena de jaulas para aves, de diferentes especies, logrando liberar mas de 50 aves, entre Tucanes, Búhos, aves Tropicales y un sin fin de especies autóctonas del Perú. Así también trepamos hasta la cima de la mega jaula para pájaros que tiene esta cárcel de animales, saboteando su estructura con el fin de que aves como loros, guacamayos, palomas torcasas, tucanetas y garzas blancas encerradas en esta mega pajarera, pudiesen encontrar salida a esta vida de encierro y volar en libertad. Posteriormente nos dispusimos a la parte mas importante de la acción, llevarnos dos felinos selváticos, ocelotes, en jaulas especialmente adecuadas para ellos y trasladarlos hacia su hábitat natural, estos animales fueron trasladados y luego liberados en su espacio salvaje, las ecorregiones de la selva baja del Perú, con el fin de otorgarles la posibilidad de una vida libre y lejos de las miradas acosadoras de turistas consumidores de la explotación animal.
• Creemos necesario mencionar y denunciar el actuar cómplice de las instituciones del estado, traficantes de animales y Zoológicos y demás responsables, que al requisar animales de manos de los viles traficantes, no encuentran mejor negocio que el encerrar a estos seres libres, en espacios reducidos como en los que se encontraban los animales que liberamos y recatamos de manos de estos explotadores Estos animales se encontraban en pequeñas jaulas, de hasta grupos de ocho aves por jaula, sin la posibilidad de volar o interactuar libremente, ellos se encontraban con claros síntomas de estrés, producido por el hacinamiento, proximidad a sus depredadores naturales y falta de luz solar. Muchos de los animales que liberamos se encontraban en un sector prohibido para los visitantes del zoológico, que no existe ni siquiera en el mapa de dicho parque, encerrados en tiendas de campaña, sin luz solar y sin el espacio suficiente que necesitarían para desenvolverse con naturalidad.
• Denunciamos así también el encierro de roedores, tortugas, aves y otros animales pequeños en contenedores plásticos con el fin de servir de alimento para otras especies, estos se encontraban girando sobre su propio eje, actitud típica en animales con problemas nerviosos producidos por el encierro, ubicados su gran mayoría en estanterías para su posterior utilización, demostrando esto la falsedad y doble discurso de las empresas que trabajan como supuestas instituciones de preservación y conservación de especies, verdaderas empresas de explotación animal, siempre ejercida desde el criterio especista de menosprecio de los intereses de individuos de otras especies.
• Queremos así también denunciar el estado en el que se encontraban los felinos que liberamos, los cuales estaban ubicados en jaulas de no mas de dos metros cuadrados, uno al lado de otro, impidiendo su libre ejercicio de intereses y capacidades, destruyendo su instinto y sometiendo su naturaleza salvaje a los intereses egoístas de empresarios que disfrazan su negocio de explotación, como de conservación y reproducción de especies. Hecho que denunciamos como falso, debido a las condiciones de las que fuimos testigos al ingreso a esta mega cárcel animal, donde los supuestos animales en recuperación, se mantenían encerrados para su posterior exhibición como objetos de entretención.
• Queremos hacer un llamado a todos los colectivos e individualidades que luchan y activan por la Liberación Animal, Humana y de la Tierra, a accionar directamente en pos de conseguir la liberación total, tomando en cuenta los intereses de los apresados bajo las manos explotadoras de dueños de Zoologicos, Toreros, criadores de animales, empresas auspiciadoras del negocio de la explotación animal, industria de las pieles, industria carnica, Circos con animales y un sin fin mas de lugares de explotación y muerte animal, tomando las medidas de seguridad necesarias, para lograr liberaciones seguras tanto para los activistas como para personas no responsables de este encierro, como son los trabajadores asalariados de estas empresas capitalistas, también victimas de la explotación en su caso por clase social.
• Queremos así también recalcar que la liberación por medio de la acción directa, es algo de lo que todos podemos ser parte, no necesitamos ni preparación especial, ni ser parte de organización alguna, tan solo un actuar planeado, un par de herramientas y una actitud dispuesta a arriesgarse en pos de la eliminación del especismo y la explotación Animal, Humana y de la Tierra, teniendo siempre claro que raza, sexo, color, nivel de inteligencia, lenguaje, inclinación sexual, o en este caso especie, no son indicativos de superioridad o inferioridad, sino características individuales dignas de ser respetadas en base a sus propios deseos e intereses, avanzando nuestra ética a un desenvolvimiento verdaderamente solidario e igualitario.

Por la Liberación Animal, Humana y de la Tierra.

INDIVIDUALIDADES POR LA LIBERACION ANIMAL.

Hasta que todos seamos Libres..."
Currently reading:
Free the Animals : The Story of the Animal Liberation Front
By Ingrid Newkirk