Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 26
Sign: Capricorn
City: Orangevale
State: California
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/5/2009
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2009 - Tuesday
 |
Current mood:  breezy
Category: News and Politics
Why does the US government own the airwaves? Why does the US government own the roads? Why does the US government own the mail? The First Amendment in the US Constitution protects our freedom of speech and the freedom of the press. Right? So why does the US government own every avenue to which these various media types can reach the people (all the while making these various outlets the most wasteful and least productive)? If private industry owned these, we'd have more competition, lower prices, and actual freedom of speech and the press instead of the perceived freedom thereof. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) should not even exist in the United States with the existence of the First Amendment. It's an oxymoron. Likewise, the US Postal Service is the only “company” legally allowed to process first class mail (not to mention sending packages to our loved ones serving overseas). Newspapers are still free from government influence! Hooray! We the people still have a legitimate outlet – wait. The government owns the roads we use (and the mail) to get those newspapers to the people (even though we the people own the roadways through taxes, vehicle registration, driver license fees, tolls, etc.). It's easy to sever those lines of communication when the government has control over them instead of private industry. You don't meet moral censorship guidelines for television or radio, so you're cut off (and/or fined) when, instead, you have a built-in censor – the remote control, dial, or power button on your TV and radio! If a “subversive” newspaper or magazine is in circulation, it can simply be plucked from the mail and roadways can be blocked in various ways. Instead, how about not opening, reading, or subscribing to it?!
One may attempt to justify said restrictions and regulation by the government as noting the difference between proactive and reactive media. Proactive meaning one must actively seek out the topic in which to read/see/hear (i.e. books, newspapers, magazines). Reactive, on the other hand, being a kind of media where one can simply stumble upon (i.e. radio, television, and... the internet?). While these may have been valid points in the past, with the continuing advancement of technology such as content filtering for the internet, lockout codes on televisions and cable boxes, the remote control to change the channel, etc. (thank you open-market technology companies!), there is no reason for the government-induced restrictions on any media outlet. If people find something offensive, change the channel as easily as you would avoid a book, newspaper, magazine, or any other publication; lock out certain channels, ratings, or times from your kids, but don't let the government baby its entire populace from whatever it'd like! That sets (already has) a dangerous precedent for control of information and the flow of information by our government, which the founding fathers were expressly trying to avoid for the good of the people as set forth in the First Amendment.
Feel free to discuss!
 | Currently reading: Odd Hours By Dean Koontz Release date: 2009-04-28 |
|
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
July 17, 2009 - Friday
 |
Current mood:  annoyed
Category: Romance and Relationships
Two people should not get back together or stay together just "for the kids." I know this. I am from one of those homes. Now don't get me wrong; if two people are getting back together for themselves, if they genuinely think it can work between them - for themselves! then, yes, by all means, go for it. Give it another go. I'm saying don't use your f**king kids as an excuse to be in a terrible, unhealthy relationship! Don't let your kids grow up seeing this kind of thing go on day-in and day-out thinking THAT is what a relationship is, all the while you thinking you're doing them some kind of selfless service by staying in that kind of environment. You're not. Don't disillusion yourself. Seriously.
Which do you think is more productive for children to see/be around: two parents who love their children, but aren't together. The kids are able to see both parents, spend quality time with two parents that love them and want to spend time with them, and they get love, attention, shelter, food, and toys from both. Or, two parents that live together. The kids have one home, get to see both parents at one time every day but hear their parents constantly fighting (EVEN IF YOU DON'T THINK THEY DO - THEY DO! And they can sense the tension and disgust you have for each other), maybe even see violence happen in the home? Dad shoving mom, mom hitting dad, or worse... The kids getting virtually neglected (YES... YES), being subject to no less than emotional trauma and stress, watching violence and hatred towards their parents - the only people they know and are supposed to love and trust. The parents are too busy caught up in their own little drama to think about what effect this may have on the children. Too busy USING THE KIDS AS AN EXCUSE TO STAY TOGETHER to further the little drama. People change. It's okay. Move on.
Sometimes the most healthy thing you can do for your kids is to separate. Be civil towards one another the few times you have to interact when around them. Don't get caught up in the past when you do. Just do what has to be done, be civil while the kids are present, and go your own way. Be an adult (even if the other isn't). Leave it at that. Trust me, the kids will thank you later on. I remember growing up seeing that crap between my parents for what, 12, 13, 14 years? Somewhere in there. The entire time just wishing, hoping, and praying that they would FINALLY get a divorce - that this last break-up between them would finally be the LAST one!
Please just don't disillusion yourself into thinking you're staying together or getting back together for the kids. You're not. You're using it as an excuse to be in a bad relationship for yourself. You're NOT being selfless - doing it for the kids; you're being selfISH - doing it for yourself and what you want.
No, it's not different this time. It's not different with you. I know my parents aren't you. Yes, I know all this. But the same pattern fits. There're always the parallels. Yes indeedy. Search deep and truly think about WHY you'd think about staying or getting back together. It's not for the kids. Kids are most healthy with happiness and love not drama and hatred being strewn about in the household.
Argh!
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
July 8, 2009 - Wednesday
 |
Current mood:  contemplative
Category: Friends
I lost my way for a minute there. I'm back on track now, I'm pretty sure, but it cost me a friendship that I valued deeply. In my opinion, that is too high a price to pay. I know I'll not make that mistake again, but that doesn't take away the guilt and emotional pain of having constantly and continually hurt someone who considered me a good friend, his best friend. It doesn't take away the fact that I was an ignoble, selfish jerk who was only looking out for himself. It doesn't take away the fact that I did it, that I was the cause of this farce I tried to pass off as a friendship, that I was so unfair to my friend in most everyday things. Instead of loving and accepting him just the way he is, as I have done with others, I pushed and pushed and pushed until there was no desire to be my friend anymore. It's a testament to him as a friend, as a person, for his character, that he put up with for as long as he did. Trying the whole time to be there for me, to do things for me, to be my friend despite all the shit I [intentionally? I don't know - I'd like to think not, but who knew the part of me that came out then?] put him through. And I explained my actions away by telling myself that I was simply protecting myself from being hurt again by someone I thought of as a friend. Not only is that NOT what friends do, but it's most certainly not who I am. I'd like to think the vast majority of my friends know this about me.
No, I'm not going to "get over it." I may move forward, slowly, try again, having learned from my mistakes, but I think that if I ever get over it, I will have lost the humility that comes with this. The price was too high as it was at the loss of his friendship. I don't want to forget it. I don't want to forget my faults, what I did, how I acted. I also think it'd be a dis-service to what Patrick meant to me; to his friendship to me that I absolutely didn't reciprocate while I had it. The friendship that he offered up the entire time that I simply took advantage of. That sickens me. "The friendship I took advantage of." I hate that, hate that about myself. I don't want to be like that. I'm no longer like that.
Overall, I'm a good person. I just lost my way for a minute there. I'm back on track now, I'm pretty sure. Dave
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
March 25, 2009 - Wednesday
 |
Current mood:  distressed
Category: Life
I found this really good vlogger that talks about being gay, and, in this episode, he talks about coming out, why it's important, and the effect on your life when you come out. It's a great point. Pay particular attention from 4:23 to 5:05 (and the rest of it from there). He has some really great points! “Since coming out, a lot has changed. I've become completely confident in who I am, my self-esteem has gone up so much. I'm just so... ready to be myself. Coming out was one of the best decisions I've ever made in my entire life. I'm so glad I did it, I would never take it back. I would do some things differently... but it was absolutely amazing. I'm so glad I've done it. I'm a completely different person. Really I'm not a completely different person though. I'm able to be the person that I am: which is different than what I was... Coming out has just been an amazing experience, I'm so glad I did it.” Don't forget, if you need to come out, or know someone who does, I'm here for support, and PLEASE pass this little gem along to them!!! Trust me, I know first hand how important and liberating this jump is and can be! I also know how terrifying it is! But trust me, it's SO worth it!
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
March 24, 2009 - Tuesday
 |
Category: Life
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|