MySpace


Michelle McKee

Michelle McKee


Última Atualização: 21/11/2009

Enviar Mensagem
Mensagem Instantânea
Enviar por E-mail para um Amigo
Inscrever-me

Arquivar Blog
[Mais antigo      Mais novo]
 /  / 
sábado, janeiro 02, 2010 7:58

Modo atual:  forte
[Note: I have tacked this to the top because I want to make sure Pat and her cohorts, Diane Fanning, Kathryn Casey and Donna Pendergast, understand that I am not going away and that I will not allow them to act as though nothing has ever occurred.  I will not forget or forgive what these cows put me through. I want a public apology, then maybe I'll let it lie.  Until then, they can continue to kiss my ass]

On September 23, 2008 I made the decision to begin using my real name.  This is neither a decision that I came to easily nor one that I take lightly.  It was a painstaking choice but one that I feel I had no alternative but to make.  It came down to a simple resolution of right and wrong, truth and lies, honor or cowardice. 

You know me as Michelle Gray.  In December 2007 I became the obsession of a woman who identifies herself as Criminal Profiler Pat Brown.  Michelle Gray is a pseudonym.  My name is Michelle McKee and I am Pat Brown's stalking victim.  This is not a joke.

I am going to take back my power and control.  I'm going to speak up and speak out, and I am going to do it as myself. 

In June of this year Pat Brown identified my real name in the comments of her blog.  She has no idea why I am using a pseudonym. For all she knows I could be trying to keep my real identity off of the Net due to domestic violence.  Her only concern was vindictive retribution for her belief that *I* was leaving comments on her blog that she didn't particularly care for.  She thinks that anyone who questions her credibility is me because I have flat out said that as far as I am concerned she is not qualified for her self-proclaimed title of a criminal profiler.

Two days ago Pat Brown again posted my real name in the public domain.  She did it as a form of terrorism; her purpose was to instill fear.  No more.  I will not be put through this crap any longer.

I am being actively investigated personally bat Pat Brown for my opinion of her professional (cough, choke) status.  However, she is not the only one who has been harassing me, libeling and slandering me, defaming me.  Nope.  She has friends who have been playing along, too.  But more on them later…

I want the entire true crime blogosphere to Google me.  I want everyone to prove to themselves that there is no way possible that my name, address and former employer could be in anyway linked to my pseudonym.  Pat Brown and her partners in crime have been alleging that I am the one who is the stalker, the defamer, the libeler, the harasser, etc. etc.  If that is the case then how did Pat Brown obtain my identity and other information?  She sure as hell didn't do it online.  I'll tell you that much! 
Google Michelle Gray, Michelle McKee and the National Insurance Crime Bureau and YOU connect them, then try to find my address.  I made sure that my identity was secure online.  There is no way to connect those dots unless you go offline and actively begin to pursue me.  There is no other way.  You have to actively stalk me in order to find out any personal information at all.  PERIOD!

Pat Brown's excuse for stalking me for almost a year is that it is "discovery" for a civil case against me – based on anonymous comments left on the Women in Crime Ink blog and, I assume, her Daily Crap-filer Blog, neither of which, incidentally, have StatCounter, SiteMeter or any other traffic monitoring code installed.  Not only doesn't she know how many readers she actually has she has employed no method to capture IPs in order to show either just cause for her allegation or even a slight inkling as to where in the world, let alone this country, the commenter or reader is coming in from.  When she says that there is a civil case pending against me or that there is a civil case in any way connected to me it is a complete and unadulterated, one hundred percent, bullshit.

Further, Donna Pendergast, Pat's co-blogger – Donna won't admit to much more than that – who is an attorney with the Michigan Attorney General's Office sent a libelous note to Corey Mitchell accusing me of calling her office line and leaving a "frightening" and "threatening" voicemail message.  Total bullshit.  I gave Donna the name to my former supervisor at NICB and the names of a couple of NICB agents she could use as witnesses.  I told her to go ahead and call them, play the tape and let them tell her that the voice wasn't mine.  My former supervisor is a retired FBI Special Agent in Charge (SAC) and SWAT team leader.  I figure she could trust him more than she's going to trust Corey to say it isn't me.  Donna never went to NICB.  She says that if I say it isn't me then okay, it isn't me.  Wow, that was easy, huh?  Does anyone besides me smell bullshit? 

I couldn't find an attorney willing to take a libel case against an attorney at the AGO, does anyone REALLY think that Pat Brown can find an attorney to file a civil case against anyone for her allegations?  At least I can prove mine.  She's just lying for the purpose of being a total bitch.  Of course the sycophants who have their heads planted firmly up her ass don't have the intelligence, or possibly the intestinal fortitude, to ask her to prove her lies.  They just sit back and chant, "Oh Pat, if you didn't speak for victim's who would?"  I'm a victim and I'd rather have someone like Andy Kahan speak for me than this phony baloney CSI wannabe piece of trash.

I locked Criminal Conduct, my blog.  I deleted posts from my MySpace.  I resigned as editor of ICB and I haven't written damn near word one since June.  Yet Pat and her partners have not let up.  The other day I saw her on my MySpace poking around.  I saw her on ICB clicking on my name looking for posts.  She obviously hasn't given up. She is still obsessed with me.  So I make a short blog post on MySpace intimating that I am going to 'poon the crap out of her.  She went nuts and left the following comment on Lampoon. 

Please note that the woman who is oh-so professional, who has her "Masters degree (obtained online), and is oh-so much smarter than law enforcement and just about everyone else on the planet can't spell worth a shit and apparently doesn't possess enough intellect to be able to locate either the business mailing address or the business email address – something a 4th grader could accomplish – and instead leaves her libelous bile in the comments of the blog.  Good thing she didn't decide to call herself a brain surgeon!  There'd be brains n blood all over the damn place.
 
 
Dear Zaz,
 
I was just given a heads up that a women who has been stalking me and harasssing me, Michelle McKee AKA Michelle Gray - one of your writers/bloggers contends that National Lampoon has given her permission to write something possibly defamatory about me. In her words, "Oh, and Lampoon! has given me permission to open a lovely can of whoop ass and kick the ever loving crap out of Pat Brown… Stalkers never prosper, Pat…"
 
Ms. McKee has harrassed and stalked a number of true crime authors and myself for extended periods of time. One author has recently sued her. While I have no objection to Ms. McKee having a negative opinion of me or my professional work, she has resorted to lies and slander concerning me and posted these on the Internet. Furthermore, she has changed my Wikipedka page so many times we had to pull it and she has stalked me relentlessly; however, she claims it is I who stalk her (because I read her blog occassionally to see if she is slandering me).
 
While I know Lampoon likes to do send ups of well-known personalities (and I have no problem with this! I enjoy them and even have to laugh when they are about me), I know Lampoon would not want to be used as a medium to support libelous words.
So, I thought I would send a heads up your way. I don't know if Ms. McKee is just talking rot about trashing me on Lampoon but, if she actually is planning a piece, please be aware that much of what she might put in it is possibly libelous.
 
Many thanks.
 
Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
301-633-1151
 
The following are comments taken from Women in Crime Ink when Pat decided to post my real name in retaliation for a commenter who she believed to be me. 
 
Anonymous said...
And yet we cant see the letter, just like your serial killer. Nor can we see the post that you are arguing about because you deleted it.
 
Okay. You are really credible.
 
June 29, 2008 11:34 PM
Pat Brown said...
Ms. Michelle McKee AKA Ms. Michelle Gray, you have been asked politely to cease and desist the abusive attacks. Please consider doing so before legal action becomes a necessity.
 
June 29, 2008 11:47 PM
Anonymous said...
You would get laughed out of court my dear. As I am not Michelle Gray nor am I Michelle Mckee. There is no abuse here by the way. Only questions that your audience wants.
 
June 30, 2008 12:07 AM
Pat Brown said...
Or Melissa, whatever.
 
I repeat, you have been asked to cease and desist.
 
June 30, 2008 12:35 AM
Anonymous said...
You like M names I see. What about just answering the questions about your creds and why LE doesn't take you seriously?
 
June 30, 2008 12:40 AM
Anonymous said...
BTW - since you think you seem to think that Michelle Gray is not her name I guess we can all know assume that she has been telling the truth about you and that you really have been stalking her. Looks like you're the one who is looking at a law suit.
 
Too bad for you. And your leaving of evidence.
 
Esquire said...
Anonymous/aka Michelle Gray wrote:
 
BTW - since you think you seem to think that Michelle Gray is not her name I guess we can all know assume that she has been telling the truth about you and that you really have been stalking her. Looks like you're the one who is looking at a law suit. Too bad for you. And your leaving of evidence.
 
Esquire writes:
 
Your accusing Pat of "stalking" you is a reaction to Pat's calling you the stalker. Your repeated and defamatory posts support her claim. You continue to return to her sites and to make your presence known. By revealing your name, Pat was clearly trying to warn you that, yes, she knows who you are and, yes, she knows where you live. Not because she is "stalking" you. It's called "discovery," which is part of the civil suit process. You cannot be served unless her attorneys can properly identify you and know where to serve you. So please heed her advice: cease and desist. If you continue with your invective by leaving posts here, you are hand-delivering to an adversary documentable evidence of your stalking Pat Brown.
 
June 30, 2008 10:51 AM
Michelle Gray said...
This is the first, last, and only time that I have ever, or will ever, leave a comment on any of your blogs.
 
These false allegations are not going to bode well for you in the end. You will be shown to be a liar and an obsessed fruitball.
 
You can make all the threats you like. You and I both know that you have nothing to substantiate your libelous remarks because what you are alleging while evoking my name has never taken place. Send your attorney my way, because I look forward to obtaining your evidence and publishing it online. I also look forward to filing a civil action against all of you in return. And yes, I do mean ALL of you.
 
The difference between you and I is that I have around 100 copies of web site traffic reports in which your static IP is present, Pat, along with search terms containing my name, email address, etc., as well as your out-clicks – going back to November/December 2007. I also have emails that went to various individuals accusing me of being a hacker by your cohorts, in which the scenario described can be shown to be fabricated and a complete lie. I have an email threatening me with career suicide for not being supportive of you. Every single incident of defamation, libel, slander and harassment against me over the last SEVERAL months has been at the hands of women who write on this blog. Every single one! By the way, in addition to hard copy proof of stalking, libel, harassment and defamation, I also have witnesses that can substantiate MY allegations because they were on the receiving end of those phone calls and emails where I was being lied about. If deposed I seriously doubt any of them will lie about the facts of what they received or were told.
 
You have nothing to back up your allegations against me. It is nothing but a poorly constructed deception and you and your little buddies have been at it for MONTHS. Other than your delusion, the only other thing you might have are emails from Blogger which are sent when someone leaves a comment. You have absolutely no traffic monitoring code present in the template of your blogs and have no way of knowing who is visting your site or if you even have more than 10 readers (which I doubt). Apparently no one has ever told you that those IPs in the emails are for Blogger and not the IPs of individuals leaving the comments. Oops, did I just blow your evidence out of the water? Yeah, I think so…
 
Now, *I* am telling YOU to cease and desist and remove your libelous remarks about me post haste. As you are well aware one of us can prove slander, libel, harassment, defamation and stalking – however, it isn't you. There is no issue of "Discovery" here. That is pedantic justification for the unjustifiable actions of you and your brain dead sycophants.
 
Since you have made it clear that you know where I live I will make it clear that based on this information and your pattern of behavior and actions I consider you to be a personal threat to the safety of myself and my family. Your obsession with me is cause for concern given the extent that you have taken this vendetta driven obsession of yours. You want my identity so terribly bad, no problem; I will be looking into taking legal action against you and your cohorts on a number of levels. I'm sure my name and mailing address will be printed nice and neat on the material you all will be receiving.
 
Have a nice day.
 
Regards,
MG
 
July 1, 2008 12:57 AM

Subject: Re: The Thanksgiving Post
Date: 12/7/2007 5:50:28 A.M. Pacific Standard Time
From: KC@kathryncasey.com 
To: [email address]

Michelle,

I read your blog on Pat today. I'm really disappointed. First: it seems vindictive, aimed at all of us for leaving. As I've said often, I respected your decision to stay, and I hoped you'd respect our decision to leave.

Second: You're breaking into a new field, studying to be a writer. You want to gain credibility and acceptance. You hope those of us in the field who have studied and worked hard to be taken seriously as journalists will give you the benefit of the doubt and accept your talents and contributions. Yet you attack Pat for working hard, which she has, to be taken seriously in her field. While it's not in the post you lifted off her website, Pat has recently finished a master's degree in her field. She's someone, like you, who focused on a goal and worked toward it.

The problem is not that you reposted her article off her website. It's the snarky, yes, snarky way you framed it in your introduction. I'm just really disappointed. Why can't we just let all of this pass without hard feelings? Why can't we just go on with our lives and pursue our own interests. Corey tried through his apology post to get beyond this, which was the right thing to do. Your determination to stir the pot yet again is petty.

Kathryn

Forwarded Message:
Subj: Computer hacking
Date: 3/12/2008 815 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time
From: KC@kathryncasey.com
To: [email address]
Sent from the Internet (Details)


Hi Corey,

Hope you're well. I read all your news in the group, and I hope this turns
out to be a great opportunity. It sounds really exciting.

I'm e-mailing reluctantly. I hoped the nastiness of our departure from ICB
was behind us and we could all go on to our own endeavours wishing each
other well, but there seem to be some lingering unpleasant consequences.
While I'm sure you have absolutely nothing to do with this, I am hoping
that you can use your influence to assist us.

I'm sure you've seen that we've started Women in Crime Ink, an all-women's
true crime blog. It's up and doing well, and we're all very excited about
the potential. But we've had some rather rough correspondence from folks
tied to Michele Grey.

Opinions are one thing. Everyone's certainly entitled to their own. But
today, Diane turned on her computer and on her screen photos appeared that
aren't hers. Someone hacked or at least tried to hack into her computer.
For what purpose, we're not sure, but the hacker is apparently involved in
ICB. The photos that popped up are all from ICB's current fare, including
the ICB logo, the booking photo of Keven Graff, and the Rodriguez wedding
photo.

It is, of course, always dangerous to jump to conclusions. Diane is on the
road today, and that's why I'm e-mailing. Because of the emails she's
already received and recognizing Michelle's talent with computers, we do,
however, wonder if she is the source.

While I know you're no longer running ICB, I am aware that you and Michele
are friends and that she respects your opinion. What we're asking is if
you'll talk to Michelle and remind her that this type of activity is
uncalled for and extremely unprofessional. We'd like reassurance that this
will never happen again.

I feel no animosity toward you, and I hope you have none for me. We're all
in the same field. It does none of us any good to propagate this further.
It's likely our paths will cross at events in years to come. Michele needs
to let go and move on.

Please let me know your thoughts on this matter and what action, if any,
you feel you can take on our behalf. If you're unable to remedy the
situation, we'll have to investigate other solutions.

Again, all the best. Hope you and your family are well.

Sincerely,
Kathryn

quinta-feira, abril 23, 2009 10:49

In Cold Blog has just gone live through Amazon Kindle and we can't wait to hear how you like being able to read us in this new format! ICB has joined the Kindle revolution with publications such as The New York Times, Huffington Post, Daily KOS, and even Vanity Fair. You can even do a review for In Cold Blog right there on our Amazon page!

Go take a peek and check out our new digs.

quarta-feira, março 18, 2009 4:37


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AyVh1_vWYQ

NSFW, but totally hilarious!!!

sexta-feira, fevereiro 20, 2009 9:13
Pat Brown Still Wants Me.  Yep, NOT a Criminal Profiler Pat Brown still thinks I'm hot.  She still can't get enough of me.  Unfortuanately, I don't roll that way... well, if she was Danica Patrick I might roll that way, but being that Pat is a wrinkled up old twat-waffle, nah, not interested in going there.  I'm sure you, gentle reader, can understand my position on this.  Or lack of interest in assuming a postion, as it were.

Pat, my dear, I do appreciate your continued interest in me, and the fact that you stopped by my MySpace last night.  But sweetheart, for your own sake, I really think you need to find another focus.  Your obsession with me is just not healthy for you.  We'd never work out, you being a psycho-bitch from Hell and all. 

Now, if I didn't know better and understand that what you really want is to get me naked and spread eagle in your bed, I'd seriously consider you to be a stalker and a threat to my safety.  I guess it's a good thing that I know what you really want is to fondle my boobies, and well, you know... get a little taste.  I wish I could help you out.  I really do.  Unfortunately, you'll just have to continue to fantasize about what it would be like to have me.

Domain Name   comcast.net ? (Network)
IP Address   69.143.237.# (Comcast Cable)
ISP   Comcast Cable
Location   Continent  :  North America
Country  :  United States  (Facts)
State  :  Maryland
City  :  Beltsville
Lat/Long  :  39.0504, -76.9055 (Map)
Operating System   Microsoft WinNT
Browser   Internet Explorer 7.0
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; GTB5; SLCC1; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; Tablet PC 2.0) Javascript   disabled
Time of Visit   Feb 19 2009 8:51:53 pm
Last Page View   Feb 19 2009 8:51:53 pm
Visit Entry Page   http://profile.myspa...le&friendid=48471144
Visit Exit Page   http://profile.myspa...le&friendid=48471144
quarta-feira, setembro 17, 2008 1:41

Don't get excited.  I'm on a true crime vacation.

Oh, and Lampoon! has given me permission to open a lovely can of whoop ass and kick the ever loving crap out of Pat Brown... 

Stalkers never prosper, Pat...

sábado, junho 28, 2008 11:30

Modo atual:  feliz

David Lohr was kind enough to invite me to be the first guest at his Investigation Discovery blog, The Criminal Report Daily.  Of course I said no.  NOT!

You can find David's blog here and my guest piece here.  Leave a comment over there and let me know what you think of it.

sábado, junho 28, 2008 9:35

Modo atual:  fantasioso

To help Corey Mitchell kick of the release of his latest book, PURE MURDER, a few of his friends hosted a virtual book tour and threw a question, or three, at him.  Corey and I had a little fun with it, we took it to the 'poon! 

There is a particular old friend bag who is still subscribed to this blog. I'd like to give a shout out to her and her friends Hagatha and Prunehilda.  Hey, girls!  How does it feel to be poone'd, ladies? 

"Letting go" can be a such satisfying experience.  {{wink}}

quinta-feira, junho 05, 2008 10:00
To help Corey Mitchell kick of the release of his newest book, PURE MURDER, a few of his friends are hosting a Virtual Book Tour for him. He'll be dropping by various blogs and web sites over the next several days where he will be answering our various questions.

At the end of the tour readers will have a chance to win signed and personalized copies of all of Corey's Kensington/Pinnacle books, all you have to do is unscramble a few words in order to reveal a quote. You'll find the Word of the Day at the end of each of post. Unscramble all 15-words and be the first to get the quote right, along with the person who said it, and the books are yours.

My questions for Corey are based on a little Thanksgiving turkey he and I shared last year and our mutual love for the 1st Amendment. But you know… maybe… just maybe… freedom of speech has gone to far, and it's time to draw a line in order to protect society from the artistic creativity of… well… some of these so-called artists… I wonder what Corey thinks…


Michelle Gray:
Corey, what do you think of violence in entertainment and the public acceptance of it?

Corey Mitchell:
It is nothing new. Violence in entertainment has existed since man deemed it needed excitement. The main difference these days is that most of our violent entertainment is something that can be experienced without actually harming people. We don't throw people to the lions anymore, we merely unleash them into the multiplex theaters or the safety of their worn-out couches.

From caveman conquests to jousts to the Bard to the Grand Guignol to the National Football League to the Bible, humans have always been drawn to violent activities, plays, music, literature, etc. This election year hoo-ha over violence in movies, music, and video games is merely a simplistic argument made by shallow individuals who are unable to think on levels just slightly above remedial. It is easy to blame a horror film for making someone go on a killing rampage. It is much more difficult to truly assess the cause of an individual's outburst because there are usually a multitude of factors that play into the equation.

Blaming violent entertainment for crime is the work of simpletons merely looking to get elected, to make themselves appear superior to others, and to show off their alleged moral righteousness at the expense of millions of other people who enjoy such entertainment and are mature enough to know how to compartmentalize the real world and make-believe.

MG: What about films such as Hostel and the Thanksgiving trailer from Grindhouse by Eli Roth? On one end of the spectrum we have Roth's Hostel series, probably one of the scariest, bloodiest, most terror inducing set of films ever made. On the other, we have his slasher trailer Thanksgiving and what looks to be a humorous parody of murder.

CM: First of all, if you believe the Hostel films are some of the "most terror inducing set of films ever made," you have not seen many horror films. Try In A Glass Cage, Nekromantik 2, Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, Man Behind the Sun, Irreversible, Slaughtered Vomit Dolls, Lucio Fulci's Zombie, The Three Mothers, Inside, etc. for quality gore and scares.

Roth's films, just like his Grindhouse trailer "Thanksgiving," offer lots of humor beyond the gore and terror. The mere casting of Roger Bart, Bree's wimpy husband from Desperate Housewives, and Richard Burgi, Susan's macho husband from the same show, in Hostel: Part II in reverse roles, is indicative of Roth's sly wit. There is also lots of silly Porky's-esque humor in his debut film, Cabin Fever, such as the kung-fu kid Dennis who loves to scream "Pancakes!" before delivering a martial arts blow on an unsuspecting college partier.

And, of course, if you have not seen Roth's trailer for "Thanksgiving," do yourself a favor and look it up. It is a perfect parody of the 70's holiday-themed slasher films and offers plenty of gore and sick humor in just over two minutes. And, by the way, SPOILER ALERT!, the stuffed body at the end of the trailer is not a woman, but Eli Roth himself!

MG: Do you think that entertainment in the form of murder says something about the state of our society when we can easily watch someone being sliced and diced on the big screen while chewing on a mouthful of Milk Duds or find the cheerleader scene from Thanksgiving amusing?

CM: Horror films are about pushing boundaries. They are the one realm of entertainment where it is forbidden to forbid anything. You know going in what you are going to get and if you are appalled or offended, then you should have known better.

The vast majority of friends and colleagues I have who are into horror (and heavy metal music) are some of the nicest, most intelligent, and gentle people you will ever meet. They are not sociopaths, they are not misogynistic pigs. They are thrill-seekers who are constrained by societal rules and are looking for an outlet. If they are able to laugh at something horrific and experience a cathartic release, more power to them. They are inevitably much more well-adjusted and stress-free than the Uptight Ninny Brigadeers who believe it is their station in life to impose their stringent views on others and castigate those who do not march in lock-step with them.

Besides, how can you not laugh when Ash (Bruce Campbell) from Evil Dead 2 chops off his possessed hand with a chainsaw only to trap it underneath a bucket when the dismembered hand decided to skitter off like an electrocuted scorpion? Of course, he then weighs the bucket down with a hardcover copy of Ernest Hemingway's novel, A Farewell to Arms. Brilliant!

MG: It seems that every horror film that comes out these days has an escalation of violence. Each has to be bloodier and more depraved than the one before. Should someone break Eli Roth's pencils and unplug his camcorder, shut down all those to dare to walk such a path with their creativity?

CM: Actually, the vast majority of mainstream Hollywood horror fare hitting the theater screens today are of the much more sanitized PG-13 variety. Recent remakes of such films as Prom Night and When A Stranger Calls, which were originally R-rated films, are now much safer than their 70's and 80's predecessors. With the possible exceptions of the Saw franchise and the Hostel flicks, most horror is watered down, less gore-filled, and aimed at the zits and hormones crowd.

Believe me, the horror and gore levels are nowhere near the level of the horror output of the 70's and 80's. Back then you had Dawn of the Dead, The Incredible Melting Man, Last House on the Left, Zombie, the canons of Lucio Fulci and Dario Argento, that were far more gruesome and terrifying than today's films.

Ironically, some of the best and most gruesome horror right now is coming out of the allegedly wimpy country of France with films such as Haute Tension, Inside, and Frontier(s). What makes these films even more fascinating is, not only do they harken back to the 70's exploitation movement of American underground horror, they tend to base their plots around seemingly real-life tragedies that any reader of true crime can appreciate. Inside tells the story of a pregnant woman protecting her unborn child from a potential fetus-snatcher. It is grim, bloody, and gripping as hell.

MG: But, Corey, perhaps have we finally become too free with our speech? Perhaps there has there come a time when we should say enough is enough and draw a line on the 1st Amendment that says, "Thou shalt not cross?"

CM: Blasphemy! Never!

When the media is barred from taking photographs of our dead soldiers after they return in coffins from Iraq, then you know our speech is not as free as we delude ourselves into thinking. When corporations kill news pieces that are potentially scabrous to prospective advertisers, you know free speech in our country is a joke.

Technically, only the government can violate the First Amendment of an individual, at least when we are talking about damages, recompense, the whole legal spectacle. The reality, however, is that Big Money rules the day and makes the rules of what we can say. It's all bullshit, of course, but it is the painful truth.

Horror films, death metal music, true crime books, Grand Theft Auto -- they are so far down on the radar as far as Big Money is concerned. The only time these subjects come up are during an election year or when some self-promoting do-gooder decides to go on a rampage against these forms of entertainment to draw attention to themselves.

MG: Come on, Corey, some of this stuff is quite offensive. Shouldn't society, our children for crying out loud, be protected from this type of material?

CM: And that, my friend, is what parents are for. That's what teachers can instill. That's why we should rely on the community mentality. Instead of worrying so much about kids seeing a gory film or reading about a brutal murder in a true crime book, we should be encouraging them to devour this material. The more knowledge our children can glean from these stories, the stronger, more aware, and more confident they will become if and when they ever have to deal with the unfortunate horrors that lurk outside.

Sure, we can lock our kids up or we can hold book burning witch hunts, but what good is that going to do anyone? Our kids are going to find a way to get their hands on this material. So instead of denying them the opportunity, we should readily present it to them, discuss it with them, teach them right from wrong, and then send them on their way when they reach adulthood, hopefully, prepared as can be.

Of course, the Uptight Ninny Brigade want you to play ostrich and stick your head in the dirt. They are afraid of their own shadow, and thus, feel compelled to wag their fingers at the rest of us mature individuals who can handle the truth (or the fake).

No matter what we do as purveyors of filth and gore, of horror and true crime, of screaming music and extreme weirdness -- we cannot let the Uptight Ninny Brigade gain the upper hand. Our unique interests are too important to squelch. We have no desire to live by the narrow-minded guidelines the UNB wish to impose on us. It's all a little too Orwellian and Huxleyian for me to swallow some days.

Go to the theaters and scream at a bloody murder on the screen. Crank up some death metal by Decrepit Birth as you cruise down the street in your neighborhood. Tell your friends about the latest true crime book that scared the hell out of you.

Be proud of your interest in the darker side of life.

You are not alone.

The "Word of the Day" is: ALL

Be sure to follow Corey Mitchell's Pure Murder Virtual Book Tour tomorrow, June 6, at MetalSucks (http://www.metalsucks.net), where Corey is an occasional contributor.
quarta-feira, abril 02, 2008 2:23
Gregg Olsen is a masterful storyteller with an acerbic wit and a wickedly evil and twisted imagination. And that has never been more apparent than in his newest novel, A Cold Dark Place. Darkly atmospheric and vividly detailed, A Cold Dark Place is a multi-layered tale of love, murder, obsession and the family ties that bind. Taking serial killers and the girls who love them to a whole new dimension, this sinister and suspense filled thriller draws the reader in and holds them by the throat until well past the last turn of the page. Warning: you'll never look at those fast-food ketchup packets the same way again.

To celebrate the release of this, his second novel, a bunch of us have asked Gregg to drop by our little corner of blog heaven and participate in a progressive interview. Gregg will be dropping in on several of his friends today and answering a question on each of their blogs. Each blog will contain a link to the next blog with the next question. Follow the links until you reach the end and then just like at the bottom of a box of Cracker Jack, you might just find a Little Orphan Annie secret decoder ring.

Gregg was gracious enough to agree to answer whatever questions we wanted to throw at him, even the personal ones. Now, when Gregg Olsen opens a door only a fool is going to say, "No, thanks." So baby, I got personal. Okay, not overly personal, but damn it, I know there's a whole lot of Gregg Olsen fans out there who've noticed the same thing I have. Someone's got a tattoo… And it's proudly displayed on the inside back cover of A Cold Dark Place. Now, since we all know that true crime readers are primarily women, all I have to say is this: "girls, we like tattoos, don't we?" Well, some tattoos. If it was on his face then I guess he'd be this guy…

M.G.: So, Gregg, what's the story behind your now infamous tattoo, and do you have any others? Enquiring minds want to know…

G.O.: I'd been thinking about getting a tattoo for awhile when I went to
Slave to the Needle in Seattle a few years back. I toyed with having something done to commemorate the men who'd died in the Sunshine Mine fire (the subject of my book THE DEEP DARK), but nothing seemed appropriate. I didn't have the biceps for a pick and shovel motif, to say the least. I decided on a simple band with the names of my wife and daughters woven into it.

People say tattoos and names are a bad idea, but hey, I know that I'll never have any more kids and I know that I'd never marry again if Claudia dumped me. There are spaces for grandchildren, too. I might add them in. That is, if I'm so lucky.

Now, if you thought my question wasn't quite what you might have expected, then wait until you see what Gregg and Brian Lindenmuth are talking about at Brian's place. Something about spaceships, conspiracies… and gregg salad sandwiches?

[Gregg Olsen is a New York Times best selling author. His newest thriller, A Cold Dark Place, is available online at Barnes & Nobel, Amazon and Borders. Gregg can also be found blogging at Crime Rant, a true crime web site he runs with partner M. William Phelps.]
domingo, janeiro 27, 2008 12:00

I GOT A GIG!!!  I'm writing for National Lampoon and my first 2 posts are up!  I'd be thrilled if you'd drop by and give them a read.  You can find one post here and the other one here.

 

My regular posting days will be Wednesdays and Saturdays.  However, I'm off to Los Angeles this week to talk with someone about another writing project so I won't be around again until next weekend.

 

Have a nice weekend and a great week!!  Oh, and feel free to inflate my ego by rating the posts and dropping a comment J