Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 58
Sign: Aquarius
City: GORHAM
State: MAINE
Country: US
Signup Date: 6/16/2006
|
|
|
|
Monday, December 18, 2006
 |
Current mood:  determined
Series of Events Relating to Sub Sea Surveyor Friday-December 8th, 2006 11:00 p.m. Received phone call from Julie at Aspasia Marina informing us of a fire on Sub Sea Surveyor 11:15 p.m. Received phone call from the marina inquiring as to whether anyone was on board etc. Greg Brooks, John Hardy Sr. and Brian Ryder were in route to the scene. 11:30 p.m. The South Portland Fire Department couldn't make access to the scene due to a locked gate. They finally cut the locks. 11:45 p.m. Coast Guard arrived with a pump and set it on the deck beside the boat. Greg spoke with the firemen and left the scene. [Surveyor was listing badly to starboard. We asked the fire department to pump out the boat. Maine Department of Environmental Protection told the fire department to pump out the boat. They told them not to let it sink as it would then become a bigger problem. The fire department said they had it under control. The Portland Fire Boat crew told the South Portland Fire Department that they should pump it out before it sunk. Brian Ryder and Greg Brooks asked to pump it, and were told by the fire department that they had it under control. We pleaded with them to remove the water.] Saturday-December 9th, 2006 8:00 a.m. Greg arrived at the boat and noticed that the boat was low in the water. The Coast Guard arrived at the same time—3 to 4 people. I told them that we needed to get the pump going soon or the boat would sink. The pump was next to the boat on the dock. The Coast Guard said that they were only there to pick up the pump. Approximately, twenty minutes later, the Surveyor went down. 9:30 a.m. Greg called Jim Fox of Boom Technologies to place an oil boom around the vessel area. Any oil leakage was contained by the afternoon. 3:00 p.m. A call was placed to Roger Hale, and a message was left for him. Sunday-December 10th, 2006 a.m. Placed another call to Roger Hale---no answer. a.m. Greg Brooks contacted All Season Marine Salvage. They looked at the job and gave a quote of $8,000.00. This quote was accepted. Monday-December 11th, 2006 a.m. All Season Marine Salvage started bringing in equipment to the site. Finished at approximately 6:30 p.m. Tuesday-December 12th, 2006 7:00 a.m. All Season crew was at the dock. When Greg arrived, equipment i.e. pumps, barrels etc. were placed on the dock beside the boat. The owner of Aspasia Marina, George, came out of his on-site office and demanded that everyone leave his property. This was a total surprise, as the day before, George had told me that All Seasons had worked there before and done a great job and were very professional. Now, his attitude was a complete turnaround. He stated that he wanted to see insurance papers, and that they had better be what he liked. Gordon McKinney from All Seasons called his agent and found out that he was not covered for that type of salvage. He inquired about adding it, and was told that they didn't handle it. Several people called everyone they knew to find coverage, with no results. Greg told the Coast Guard about the fuel spill of another boat—Geno. 12:00 p.m. The Coast Guard stopped by again (about the 30th time) and informed me that at 4:00 p.m., they were going to classify this as a federal issue. We had been doing due diligence since the boat sank to get it raised. All Season supplied a salvage plan which I gave to the Coast Guard. Seatow, who had full insurance, was willing to take over the job but was refused by Aspasia Marina's owner, George. He said he would only let Roger Hale do the job. It is well known that Roger is a friend of his. It was now 3:00 p.m. Roger Hale had been made aware of the Coast Guard's ultimatum. He quoted us the outrageous price of $55,000.00. We were given no choice. Once we informed the Coast Guard, they said they approved of Roger and waived the 4:00 p.m. deadline. Roger Hale said he'd be over first thing in the morning. Wednesday-December 13th, 2006 8:00 a.m. Greg Brooks arrived at the boat. Roger had not called. He said he was gearing up and would be over later. Boom Technologies was on site, and the Coast Guard was there. They said that they would head back to base and await a call. John Hardy, Sr. called Roger Hale, and was told that he'd be on site by 4:00 p.m. He said he'd call the Coast Guard and explain. Greg followed up and called the Coast Guard and got their voice mail. He left a message at 10:00 a.m. [Throughout these events, the Department of Environmental Protection, the Coast Guard and Boom Technologies were on site].
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, December 11, 2006
 |
Current mood:  sad
Category: Life
Talk about a bad day! I got the call around 10:30 pm from the marina where Sub Sea Surveyor was docked. There was a fire!! I headed out the door as fast as I could, but forgetting it was 13 degrees out. It took about 30 minutes to reach the dock from my house. When I arrived there were several fire trucks from the South Portland Fire Department, Coast Guard, Maine DEP, news teams, police as well as others. As I headed to the boat down the long icy pier I could see the Portland Fire boat was tied up beside Surveyor. It was extremely icy on the pier. My partner John was there and Brian the engineer arrived soon after. There were about a dozen firemen on the boat with hoses putting out the fire. They used both water and foam. There was a bad list in the vessel telling us that the boat needed to be pumped out before she sunk. The Maine DEP told the fire department to pump it out before it sunk and caused a much bigger problem. The Coast Guard brought pumps from the CG Station just a few docks down. The crew on the Portland Fire boat also told them to pump it out to prevent a much bigger problem. The wind was blowing making it much colder than I could stand dressed the way I was. The Fire department would not let us board the boat. They told us they had it under control and would take care of everything. The pumps were sitting on the dock waiting to be used. Brian stayed and John and I left around 1:30 - 2 am. I returned first thing the next morning, and a Coast Guard crew pulled up behind me stating they were there to pick up the pumps. As I walked down the pier I noticed right away the boat was very low in the water. When I got to the boat I could see it would not be long before she sunk if she was not pumped. I pleaded with the Coast Guard crew to use their pumps to stop her from sinking. They said they were only here to pick up the pumps. At this time, as well as when the firemen were aboard, she should have been pumped out. It wasn't, the pumps were never removed from their containers and I watched the ship go under with a very sick feeling in my gut. The pumps were there, the fire department was there, the Coast Guard was there, why didn't they use the pumps like they said they would? Why did the pumps just sit on the dock until the ship sank causing a much bigger problem? They would not let us board the boat, they said they had it under control. Now this.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, September 23, 2006
 |
Current mood:  sad
Category: Life
SEA RELIEF/SUB SEA RESEARCH The phone rang. It was Gary Burris of publiceyestv.org He had heard through the grapevine about our ship M/V diamond in Key West Florida. As he started telling me about the victims of Katrina still without aid, my heart sank. I had donated to the Salvation Army, but that was just money. What could I do, sitting in my office here in Maine? Out of site, out of mind? As he continued talking to me about the people in the fishing communities in the lower Mississippi Gulf Region, about how one town that had 1700 homes, and now had 5 left standing, I knew I had to do more. Gary explained how he was trying to organize a sea effort to bring much needed supplies to some of the hardest hit areas, the mouth of the Mississippi river. He explained what he had done up to now, but needed to go a lot further. He needed our ship. He needed the technology we had aboard to scan the river's bottom so the relief ships wouldn't sink, hitting submerged objects from the storm. A big task to perform in such a short time. I agreed, but would have to confirm with my partner first, knowing what his answer would be. It was a go. He knew as I did; we need to do all that we can to save those poor souls still without aid of any kind. Now, how to pull it all off? We had been working off the coast of Massachusetts in our 65' vessel, M/V Sub Sea Surveyor, Capt Mark Palmer and Capt Kai Morton were on their way up to Maine to assist in the operations here. I called Capt Mark on his cell phone and explained the situation to him. "We have to do it" was his reply. He was then in Memphis, so instead of taking a left to Maine, he took a right to Key West. The ship needed to be prepped for the trip. There was lots to do. There was money to get, food and supplies for the boat, fuel, crew to assemble, and move our newest surveying equipment to Florida. All of which seemed impossible to accomplish in a short time. Could we do it? Would we be too late? Lots of questions, very few answers. Still, we had to give it 150%. Then another call came, it was Josh Tickell of veggievan.org. He had been speaking with Gary Burris also, and had joined with us to get the much needed aid to its destination. He had a donation of several thousand gallons of Bio diesel to fuel us for the trip. He had gotten the donation from West Central. I thought, Bio diesel? What was that? He explained to me the details about it, but I was not sure we could use it in our 4, 12V71's aboard the Diamond. I told him I would get back to him. I made several calls to find out more about this fuel. I was told it was good fuel, but should be put in clean tanks. We had been buying our fuel while the ship was in Haiti, not always the cleanest fuel. Would we have problems? We'd find out soon. Capt Mark Palmer, Capt Kai Morton and Norman Laskey took Diamond from Key West to Ft. Myers Beach, Florida to the staging point of Sea Relief. Short handed, they arrived safely. Meanwhile, Brian Ryder and myself unloaded all the newest surveying equipment from Sub Sea Surveyor and loaded it into our trailer and Expedition. A full day of dismantling the electronics and packing them for the long road voyage to Ft. Myers Beach. Thirty hours after finishing the packing we arrived there. One hell of a long drive. I had keep in phone contact with both Gary Burris and Josh Tickell as well as many others trying to coordinate this huge effort. Things were slowly coming together. We had fuel, we had equipment and electronics, we had crew. We needed food and cash, to feed the crew and pay them. We would not profit in any form for doing this, it was to help and that was that. The crew need to be paid, I didn't. Josh came through again, he had promised to come up with the money for the crew. Still, we needed more, there was oil and charts, food, impellers, filters and other supplies needed for the ship in order to make a safe crossing of the Gulf. Where would we get the money? The donors from Maine that Helped were: John and Lois Hardy Greg and Kathy Brooks David and Pam Smith Outside Maine: Bill Seliger- E.O. Industries Bob Francis ABC 7 - Ft Myers Beach Florida Exhausted from the trip from Maine, there was still lots of things to do. No rest yet. There was a media frenzy about what we were about to do. There must have been 10-15 TV stations with live feeds as well as several newspapers covering our effort. They were there with us for three days, until we departed Ft. Myers. The media helped out by requesting donations for the victims of Katrina, stop by and drop off supplies at the ship, was their main message. It worked! All said and done, we had collected tons and tons of drinking water, baby supplies, soap, food, rice and beans, bug spray, first aid kits, power bars, etc, and a pallet of Rice Krispies Treats. A large amount of the supplies came from Harry Chapin Food Banks. Thank you all for your generous contributions. It was time to go! Our ship was loaded, the shrimp boat Equalizer was loaded. We departed at high tide, about 11 am, and headed out into the gulf for our 500 mile trip. The weather was hot, the seas calm. There was a lot of excitement aboard that morning. We were all eager to get to where we were going to deliver the supplies that were so desperately needed. We had 11 people aboard. A bit crowded, but we would make do. It was grilled hot dogs for lunch, easy to make and not a bad first meal. Everyone chipped in and the daily work went much easier than we expected. The next day we stopped to wait on the Equalizer, she had fallen back about 20 miles, she was much slower than Diamond. While we waited, we all jumped overboard for a pleasant swim in the clear waters of the gulf. We were in 17,000 feet of water. It was a refreshing break and everyone enjoyed the time spent together. Fifty hours after departing we arrived at the mouth of the Mississippi river. We had passed hundreds of oil platforms which dot the gulf on our way. Several were partially destroyed, but the rest seemed like they were up and running, a good thing. As we motored into the Mississippi, everyone was on deck, silently watching the shoreline. As we headed up the river, it became very apparent that we were in the place Katrina came ashore. The devastation was massive. Bark had been ripped from several miles of trees, barges weighting hundreds of tons were thrown upon the shore like they were matchsticks, houses were everywhere along the levees, thrown there against their will, smashed, cars and boats, ships and trees, all demolished. No one said much as we went further up the river. It was like an atomic bomb had leveled the area. Mile after mile, total devastation. After 80 miles we came to the first somewhat active place we had seen, Belle Chasse, Louisiana. We rafted up with a disabled ferry boat. We had made it to our destination. This small town was feeding 2000 misplaced families, they needed the supplies, and we were there for that reason. It didn't take long to unload both vessels. Everyone helped. Pallet after pallet was unloaded by hand. It was hot and everyone was soaking wet with sweat, but no one complained. The people were great, and very thankful for our efforts. I just wish we could have done more. This is when we heard about Hurricane Rita. She was following us across the gulf, staying far enough behind us so we didn't know she was there. The evacuations had begun again! What were we going to do now! We decided to stay put and wait. If she headed our way anymore, we'd head upriver and try to outrun her. Thank God she continued on her course. We had heavy rain and wind, but we survived her. We stayed over 10 days after our arrival. I went to New Orleans to the airport, along the way I passed the scenes we all saw on TV, the Super Dome, the flooded streets, the destroyed homes, and some of the victims. My heart was sad. As people told me their stories, I cried with them. Some had lost all hope, most did not. The human sprit is strong in these people, and they will be back. The seas were calming some, it is time to leave, but not forget. Greg Brooks
VIDEO - 65 Megs Trip up the Mississippi River DIVX VIEWER - Small file
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, September 04, 2006
 |
Category: News and Politics
 | Treasure hunt Salvage in wake of ruling in West Palm Beach may reveal bounty that far outstrips famous Atochas | An 18th century shipwreck believed to contain a king's horde of Spanish gold, silver and jewels more spectacular than the $400 million treasure recovered by Mel Fisher from the sunken galleon Nuestra Senora de Atocha has been found in deep water about 40 miles southwest of Key West. Treasure hunters whove examined the wreck say their research indicates that its the Notre Dame de Deliverance a 166-foot, armed merchant vessel of French origin that sailed under a Spanish flag. The research includes surveys of the site by state-of-the-art remote sensing devices and divers, a study of historical records, and the discovery that a few silver items including a crucifix, plate and some coins were brought up years ago by other salvagers. It was one of the richest ships ever lost, says Greg Brooks, 51, the co-manager of Portland, Maine-based Sub Sea Research Inc., which is conducting the search and proposed salvage effort. He estimates the value of the Deliverances trove could be between $2 billion and $3 billion. Sub Sea Research recently followed its findings with a quiet trip to federal court in West Palm Beach to stake a claim under admiralty law. In October, Sub Sea won an order from Senior U.S. District Judge James C. Paine allowing the company to arrest the shipwreck and protect itself from modern-day pirates. The wreck is located substantially inside the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary but outside Florida territorial waters, according to court records. The law considers wreck sites submerged cultural resources. Those found in the sanctuary a federal trusteeship co-administered by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the state of Florida are strictly regulated. A permit is required to conduct a detailed survey and inventory of a wreck site. Additional permits are needed to recover and get title to the treasure. Brooks says the law should now protect the company from other possible claimants if the wreck is indeed the Deliverance. The state has no claim, says Brooks, because the wreck is beyond the three-mile limit. Spain has asserted admiralty claims to lost warships in U.S. courts, but the Deliverance was privately owned. Sank in a hurricane The Notre Dame de Deliverance, hired by Spain and owned by the French West Indies Co., which is long defunct, capsized and sank in a hurricane on Nov. 1, 1755, a day after departing Havana for Cadiz, Spain. On board were 512 passengers and crew. The ship, named for an ancient French cathedral in the Normandy village of Lion-sur-Mer, was a top-heavy vessel equipped with 64 cannons, according to documentation cited by Sub Sea Research. It was hired by Spain because the kingdom was broke and could no longer build her own ships, and because the French and Indian War and the Seven Years War were diverting Spain's naval resources. By 1750, [Spains system] that had for centuries shipped treasure back from the New World had virtually collapsed, says R. Duncan Mathewson III, Mel Fishers former chief archaeologist who recently signed on as a consultant to Sub Sea Research. Mathewson, a member of the marine sanctuarys advisory council, says Spain needed ships from other countries to transport treasure. The Deliverance departed Havana on Halloween with a Spanish escort of seven or eight smaller, schooner-like vessels called zabras, according to Brooks research in Cuba and elsewhere. The ship soon met a fate that Brooks now believes was remarkably similar to what befell the Atocha and its hapless crew in surrounding waters 133 years earlier. The hurricane struck the night after the ship left Havana, its eye passing over Havana to the southwest. The escorting zabras reportedly were able to survive the storm and scudded across the outer reefs to eventually anchor on the northwest side of the Marquesas Keys to ride out the storm the following morning, according to a research report prepared by Brooks and Sub Sea researcher Edward Michaud in July. The Deliverance, blown off course, wasnt so lucky. Sailors from the escorts who made it back to Havana reported the treasure ship foundered in roiling seas 12 nautical miles off the Marquesas Keys, rolled over and sank in waters too deep to allow salvage. An incomplete manifest of Deliverance cargo that was owned by Spains King Charles III declares those riches to include 17 chests packed with nearly 1,200 pounds of gold bullion, 15,000 gold doubloons, six chests of gems, and more than a million silver pieces. That doesn't count contraband or any valuable surviving belongings of passengers. In contrast, the 112-foot Atochas approximate yield to date is 115 gold bars, 900 silver bars, 200 pounds of gold, 3,000 emeralds, 135,000 silver coins and less than 100 gold coins. The largest treasure ever salvaged worth more than $1 billion was recovered in the 1990s from the 1857 wreck of the coal-burning sidewheeler S.S. Central America. That American ship went down off the coast of South Carolina carrying bullion and coins being brought back to the east coast by those who'd struck it rich during the California Gold Rush. Excited but cautious If the shipwreck found by Sub Sea Research is indeed the Deliverance, it capsized and sank in waters 180 to 200 feet deep, about 10 miles from where the Atocha was found in shallower waters in the 1970s by the late Mel Fisher. Undersea search devices like side scan sonar and remotely operated vehicles have located an intact hull, two encrusted piles of ballast stones and what Brooks says appears to be cannons on the seabed. The wreck lies outside Floridas territorial waters. It looks like two wrecks, says Brooks. Mathewson is enthusiastic but cautious about the find. It is important to emphasize we haven't dated or identified any of the [sonar] anomalies yet, and we don't know if it is the Deliverance, says the marine archeologist, who has not yet visited the site or seen video shot by Sub Sea Research. But I'm very excited. He says its promising that the wreck was a good-sized ship that appears to be pre-19th century. We have side scan images of what looks like a well-articulated, intact lower hulled structure with full ballast, he adds. Mathewson says records indicate clear signs of a hurricane at that particular time. The question is did the Deliverance go down in this part of the keys or go down in some other part, he says. The ship was reported to have flooded and foundered in a very deep sea. You would therefore expect the hull to be pretty much intact, and thats what the images are suggesting. It's not a vessel that's scattered or broken up. The Deliverance has remained largely outside the shipwreck lore of the Keys. Even within the treasure hunting community, the Deliverance isnt well known. Bob Frogfoot Weller, a longtime South Florida treasure hunter whos written six books on the topic, says he's never heard of the Deliverance. Just because they find a ballast pile, that absolutely doesn't make it a treasure wreck, says Weller, who lives in Lake Worth. There are thousands of wrecks along the coast of Florida, but there aren't that many that are real, serious treasure wrecks. Another dose of skepticism comes from Dr. John Broadwater. Broadwater is the manager of the Monitor National Marine Sanctuary off the coast of North Carolina, the site of the wreck of the Civil War ironclad USS Monitor. Its distinctive round turret was brought to the surface to great fanfare last summer. Treasure hunters are often wrong, and so are archeologists, Broadwater says. It's so easy to go off and find something that has some of the characteristics of what you are looking for because you want so much to find it. Still, more than one member of famed treasure hunter Mel Fishers team has found evidence about the Keys wreck site convincing enough to join Sub Sea Research's team. Lead attorney Guy E. Sandy Burnette Jr., a Tallahassee solo practitioner, says he's brought aboard Fisher attorneys David Paul Horan of Key West and William VanDercreek, professor emeritus of Florida State Universitys law school. Burnette convinced Judge Paine that the find is genuine and that an order protecting the wreck from rival treasure seekers was necessary by showing him lead sheathing that once protected the hull from worms and was recovered outside the national marine sanctuary. The sheathing is the only item removed so far by Sub Sea Research, Brooks says. The court order applies to an area that covers 18 square miles. About 90 percent of the wreck is located in the sanctuary, he says. Still, Burnette says, we had to go to court to protect our rights outside the sanctuary. Sub Sea Research applied for an inventory permit in September. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration general counsel Martin Freeman, in Silver Spring, Md., confirmed the application is pending but declined further comment. An official at the marine sanctuarys Key Largo office who is familiar with the application declined comment. Still, Brooks and Burnette remain confident they've complied with the rules and will get the permit soon. We've gotten very strong assurances that they won't consider another permit for the area while ours is pending, says Burnette. Brooks says that once we get it in hand, and the weather clears, we'll be back at the site. The marine sanctuary rules, which evolved from Mel Fishers protracted and ultimately successful legal battle with Florida over the right to the Atocha treasure, allow private salvagers to work wrecks on public property as long as the publics interest in historic preservation is protected. Generally, that means commercial salvagers like Sub Sea Research can obtain legal title to valuable items such as bullion, coins and gems deemed by archeologists to be of no special historical interest. The public would own any unique artifacts. But because the marine sanctuarys rules of ownership are inexact, the potential remains for litigation over each item if and when treasures of disputed ownership are hauled from the wreck. Distracted by Columbus ship Before he hunted sunken treasure, Brooks built swimming pools for a living. About a decade ago, after 19 years in that business, he cashed out to find his fortune. Brooks principal partner and fellow investor is John Hardy, a former National Aeronautics and Space Administration engineer who currently runs a La-Z-Boy Furniture Gallery in South Portland. Brooks says he's personally spent a million dollars so far in the hunt for treasure that he believes has led him to the Deliverance. He's helped make ends meet doing salvage work for insurance companies. Brooks, who is married and has a 15-year-old daughter, has plans to create a shipwreck museum and aquarium in Portland. Until late June, when they first identified the wreck in the Straits of Florida as the Deliverance, Brooks and his associates spent much of their search time in wreck-infested waters off the north coast of Haiti. It's there that Brooks and his partners think they've made another stunning discovery the ballast stones and anchor of Christopher Columbus flagship, the Santa Maria. The Santa Maria struck a reef and sank off Cap Haitien in 1492. Last summer, Brooks was preparing to return to Haiti when Michaud, a Sub Sea researcher in Framingham, Mass., began turning up information about the Deliverance. The more we dug, the more we found that fit, says Brooks. So Haiti was off, and Key West was on. While Brooks and his company are the first to identify the Keys wreck as the Deliverance, they are not the first divers to have visited the site. In the mid 1990s, Thomas Yerian, a Key West resident, was issued a five-year search permit by the sanctuary, but it later expired. Yerian could not be located for comment. It's been found before, but nobody recognized it, says Brooks. Or, perhaps, nobody's had the resources until now to mount an expensive and hazardous expedition, and overcome the bureaucracy, to locate and raise valuables from the wreck site. Brooks began attempting to check out the Keys wreck site in 1998. Recent technological advances in underwater imaging devices, however, are opening up the search, he says. Sub Sea Researchs primary recovery vessel is the 102-foot M/V Diamond, a converted U.S. Navy torpedo retriever thats currently docked on Stock Island near Key West. Today, says Brooks, about a dozen people are employed by Sub Sea Research to conduct the search of the Deliverance and document it with TV cameras; more will sign on when salvage activity at the site resumes. Everyone is a subcontractor, working mostly on speculation for an agreed-upon share of any booty. Survivors cannibalized? All 512 crew and passengers on the Deliverance were presumed lost at sea. But Brooks and Michaud now hypothesize that as many as 400 survivors used small longboats and gigs to reach Matanca Key, a spit of sand nearby. The site now is submerged and is named Rebecca Shoal. Historians previously have reported that 400 Frenchmen were butchered and cannibalized by Calusa Indians on Matanca Key, or Slaughter Key as it was also known, sometime before 1775. Brooks says he's since learned that a year after the Deliverance sank, a French governor-general in the Caribbean dispatched two French frigates and 600 French and Spanish sailors to the Marquesas Keys to enact retribution on the Calusas for their alleged involvement in the massacre of French seamen who had survived a shipwreck. The French found the bulk of the Calusa tribe on Key West and slaughtered more than 3,000. The bloodbath, Brooks says, marked the beginning of the end for the now-extinct tribe and may account for Key West's Spanish name, Cayo Hueso, or Island of Bones. That hypothesis may never be proved. But 40 miles away, the answers to other questions are lying in the twilight 200 feet down. The bottom is flat there, Mathewson says. Theres no coral growth. It's kind of a silty sand substrate, and there won't be any environmental problems with doing work on this site. If it's the Deliverance, it's pretty much just sitting there, waiting.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Monday, August 14, 2006
 |
Current mood:  cheerful
Category: Life
I'm currently running the latest version of GirlFriend and I've been having some problems lately. I've been running the same version of DrinkingBuddies 1.0 forever as my primary application, and all the GirlFriend releases I've tried have always conflicted with it. I hear that DrinkingBuddies won't crash if GirlFriend is run in background mode and the sound is turned off. But I'm embarrassed to say I can't find the switch to turn the sound off. I just run them separately, and it works okay. GirlFriend also seems to have a problem coexisting with my Golf program, often trying to abort Golf with some sort of timing incompatibility. I probably should have stayed with GirlFriend 1.0, but I thought I might see better performance from GirlFriend 2.0. After months of conflicts and other problems, I consulted a friend who has had experience with GirlFriend 2.0. He said I probably didn't have enough cache to run GirlFriend 2.0, and eventually it would require a Token Ring to run properly. He was right - as soon as I purged my cache, it uninstalled itself. Shortly after that, I installed GirlFriend 3.0 beta. All the bugs were supposed to be gone, but the first time I used it, it gave me a virus anyway. I had to clean out my whole system and shut down for a while. I very cautiously upgraded to GirlFriend 4.0. This time I used a SCSI probe first and also installed a virus protection program. It worked okay for a while until I discovered that GirlFriend 1.0 was still in my system. I tried running GirlFriend 1.0 again with GirlFriend 4.0 still installed, but GirlFriend 4.0 has a feature I didn't know about that automatically senses the presence of any other version of GirlFriend and communicates with it in some way, which results in the immediate removal of both versions. The version I have now works pretty well, but there are still some problems. Like all versions of GirlFriend, it is written in some obscure language I can't understand, much less reprogram. Frankly I think there is too much attention paid to the look and feel rather than the desired functionality. Also, to get the best connections with your hardware, you usually have to use gold-plated contacts. And I've never liked how GirlFriend is totally "object-oriented." A year ago, a friend of mine upgraded his version of GirlFriend to GirlFriendPlus 1.0, which is a Terminate and Stay Resident version of GirlFriend. He discovered that GirlFriendPlus 1.0 expires within a year if you don't upgrade to Fiance 1.0. So he did, but soon after that, he had to upgrade to Wife 1.0, which he describes as a huge resource hog. It has taken up all his space, so he can't load anything else. One of the primary reasons he decided to go with Wife 1.0 was because it came bundled with FreeSexPlus. Well, it turns out the resource allocation module of Wife 1.0 sometimes prohibits access to FreeSexPlus, particularly the new Plug-Ins he wanted to try. On top of that, Wife 1.0 must be running on a well warmed-up system before he can do anything. Although he did not ask for it, Wife 1.0 came with MotherInLaw which has an automatic pop-up feature he can't turn off. I told him to try installing Mistress 1.0, but he said he heard if you try to run it without first uninstalling Wife 1.0, Wife 1.0 will delete MSMoney files before doing the uninstall itself. Then Mistress 1.0 won't install anyway because of insufficient resources.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, August 12, 2006
 |
Current mood:  cheerful
Category: Jobs, Work, Careers
A letter to the New Minister of Finance.
June 28, 2006
Honorable Daniel Dorsainvil Minister of the Economy & Finance Government of Haiti Port-au-Prince Haiti
Dear Sir,
I would like to take this opportunity to introduce myself to you. My name is Greg Brooks and I am the senior partner of Sub Sea Research LLC, Portland Maine. I look forward to personally meeting you upon my next trip to Haiti in the very near future. I would also add that the people of Haiti hold a special place in my heart.
Iâm sure you are aware of Sub Sea Research by this time, either through Mr. Bazin, Haitian television, radio, US Embassy or other means.
Sub Sea Research has invested time as well as money in what it believes will be an outstanding opportunity for Haiti as well as us. Please realize we put the people of Haiti and their marine environment as first priority. Hundreds if not thousands of ships were attracted to the multitude of naturally protected deep bays and harbors surrounding Haiti -which lies in the middle of one of the most popular Dutch West Indies Trade Routes for the Ships of Discovery and Spanish Main. It was also one of the strongholds of Buccaneers, Privateers and Freebooters throughout this period - and therefore illustrates the incredible wealth of Sea faring history lying in repose off Haiti's shores.
Sub Sea Research also hopes to strike a chord with people who are looking to add value to their lives and instill adventure in their travels by volunteering their time and talents and joining Sub Seaâs new âDiving into Historyâ program. This is currently being developed to allow students and travelers and divers the opportunity to experience a once in a lifetime adventure, while aiding our efforts to identify, locate and recover Haitiâs incredibly rich and undetected Maritime Heritage and Shipwreck history.
A maritime museum is planned in Haiti and Maine to display the recovered artifacts and to bring Haitiâs and Maineâs maritime past to the present.
Since arriving in Haiti surveys have been done on miles of coastline and many potentially significant targets have been found. Some of our research indicates these vessels could hold hundreds of millions if not billions of dollars of low historical value artifacts such as coins, bullion and precious gems. That multiplied by the many wrecks researched so far would boost the Haitian economy and save its undersea marine heritage.
US Senator Susan Collins has aided us in our correspondence with Mr. Bazin, as well as the US Embassy through David Reimer. Our state Governor, John Baldacci has endorsed our goals stating that a joint project such as this will have many rewards for both the people of Haiti as well as the people of the United States.
Our vessel, M/V Diamond is still on station and has been for over three months in Haiti, waiting, and most importantly, guarding sites in the area against looters who wish to steal from Haiti. We are determined to do a good job, not to get all we can and leave. We have made a long term âcommitmentâ to Haiti and to its people.
I would like to request a meeting with you to discuss this very important matter as soon as possible. Iâm sure that all your questions can be answered and we can come to an understanding. I look forward to your prompt reply.
Sincerely Yours,
Greg Brooks Co-Manager Sub Sea Research LLC
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
 |
Current mood:  blank
Category: News and Politics
David Bright, a leading researcher into underwater exploration and shipwrecks, has died after diving to the site of the Andrea Doria off Nantucket, where he was working in preparation for the wreck's 50th anniversary. He was 49.
Bright, of Flemington, N.J., resurfaced from a dive late Saturday with decompression sickness and went into cardiac arrest, according to the Coast Guard. He was pronounced dead at Cape Cod Hospital a short time later.
Bright was a historian and an experienced technical diver who had explored the Titanic, Andrea Doria and other shipwrecks many times 120 times for the Andrea Doria.
The Andrea Doria was headed from Genoa, Italy, to New York when it collided with the Swedish ship Stockholm on July 25, 1956, killing about 50 people. The Italian luxury liner lies at the bottom of the Atlantic in 200 feet of water.
Bright had an extensive collection of artifacts and established the Andrea Doria Museum Project, which lends artifacts to museums. He was the founder of the Andrea Doria Survivor Reunions Committee.
"His passion has been growing for a little over 30 years, all kinds of shipwrecks and getting to know them," Elaine Bright, his wife of 23 years, said Monday.
"It's very traumatizing to his entire family but we know that he's happy. It's a very sad thing, but water, scuba diving was what he wanted to do," she said.
Bright started the Nautical Research Group about four years ago after his retirement from Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, where he worked for 12 years as a research scientist, his wife said.
He also spent two years working with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on the exploration of the wreck of the Civil War ironclad USS Monitor.
Memorial services were planned in Flemington and in his hometown near Niagara Falls, N.Y. In addition to his wife, he is survived by his mother, two brothers and three children.
David dove on one of our wrecks off the Florida Keys. He will be missed. My heartfelt prayers goes out to his family.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Friday, July 07, 2006
 |
Current mood:  busy
Category: Goals, Plans, Hopes
Efforts To Raise Super Secret Nazi U-Boat Off Cape Cod
"OPERATION CA-35" is a joint project of discovery conducted by Trident Research & Recovery, Inc. of Framingham, Massachusetts and Sub-Sea Research, Inc. of Portland, Maine. It is much more than just a marine salvage operation. Indeed, it is an attempt to discover the facts surrounding the sinking of a legendary German U-Boat off the coast of Cape Cod, Massachusetts in August of 1944, and to uncover the reasons for its secrecy for over fifty-four years.
The name assigned to this project is derived from the wartime German Naval marine quadrant location of the U-Boat wreckage initially located in 1993. The term 'CA' refers directly to the German navigational box coordinate designated for the area immediately off the eastern shore of Cape Cod, Massachusetts, with the numbers '35' referring to the location within that designated box.
The process of discovery is a very time consuming matter. The reader must keep in mind that this brief is preliminary and therefore, incomplete. As information is received and assessed by Trident and Sub Sea it will be duly posted within updated and revised versions of this briefing.
II. H I S T O R I C A L O V E R V I E W
The availability of recently declassified military, political and intelligence documents are slowly assisting the professional researcher in filling in the gaps of World War Two history. Instead of seeing what appears to be a convoluted series of events we are now starting to understand just how the geopolitical strategies of the various governments involved in the conflict actually dictated the outcome of the battlefield scenario.
With this in mind, we will relate here a general status of World War Two as it stood during the summer and fall of 1944, and then lay in the minute details that actually affected the important events unfolding during this time frame.
During the summer of 1944 the United States and her Allies, namely Great Britain and the Soviet Union, had commenced the final push to victory over Germany's Third Reich in Europe. The now famous "D-Day" landings on the French Normandy coast were successfully accomplished on 6 June and the German battle lines gradually gave way under the Allied onslaught. The German High Command knew well that it was the beginning of a long retreat and would ultimately end in a total defeat..
In fact, a little over a year earlier in the month of February, 1943 the German military and civilian populace witnessed the disastrous events unfolding on the Russian Front. With the loss of the city of Stalingrad to the Soviet forces those individuals inside Germany with any insight at all could see very well what the inevitable outcome would be. As a result of these German military losses the several Nazi-Opposition groups, already in place within Germany since 1939, now began to increase their activity. These particular individuals and organizations firmly believed that Hitler's plans of domination were a direct threat to their country's best interests. The groups incorporated many of the German social and political elite who had actually assisted Hitler's Fascist machine in the first place, most notably Germany's "Technocrats" of political leaders, industrialists, bankers and highly placed military officers. By February of 1943 these opportun ists became increasingly disillusioned with the Hitlerite agendas and commenced making their own arrangements for their post-war futures, both as individuals and as corporate entities.
Highly placed military leaders such as Admiral Wilhelm Canaris, Chief of Germany's leading intelligence agency the 'Abwehr', and Field Marshals' Walter von Kluge and Erwin Rommel, as well as several high-ranking staff officers within the Kriegsmarine and Wehrmacht, actively conspired in the failed attempt to assassinate Adolph Hitler on the 20th. of July, 1944.
While the German military was attempting to eliminate the problem at its source, (Adolph Hitler), the conservative civilian opposition groups were attempting to alter the inevitable outcome of the war by initiating contacts with the "Western Allies", Great Britain and the United States. These various contacts were an effort to end the war for Germany under favorable terms for an armistice. The Nazi Opposition groups were literally fighting the clock, as every day that passed without an end to the war meant the further loss of German life and the wholesale destruction of property and post-war industrial capability. In fact, these specific concerns of a post-war German industrial survival were the prime motives of the Nazi-Opposition.
The Western Intelligence agencies and military commands were well aware of just what was going on inside Germany at this time and actually conducted numerous secret meetings with the German military and civilian leaders in an effort to end the war. However, the Western Allies possessed a vastly different agenda. Upon review of the available declassified political documents it appears that the American parties negotiating certain details with the German representatives had several separate agendas - all of which seem geared more at personal gain rather than the American public's best interest.
The President of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, had publicly stated as early as 1943 that no terms except "Unconditional Surrender" would be accepted from Germany by the three Allied powers; the United States, Great Britain and the Soviet Union. Roosevelt was to maintain this stand throughout the war. However, many of the hard-line political capitalists within the United States Department of State, the Office of Strategic Services and the military intelligence services had a vastly different idea of just how to end the war - all of which were to run contrary to the Presidential administration's policy decisions.
Operationally, the German U-Boat force still managed to keep its U-Boat fleet somewhat active during the summer and fall of 1944. The official records indicate that most of the available U-Boats were operationally concentrated within the North Sea and around the British Isles in its continuing attempt to strangle the Allied supply lines. Occasionally an independent U-Boat patrol would be deployed into the North Atlantic to sink ships, report on weather or both. There were two "Special Missions" deployed against the American coast in 1944, only one of which was to succeed off the Maine coast near the end of the year. In that particular case, the U-1230 successfully landed two agents at Winter Harbor. The success was minimal however, since both men were eventually picked up by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
During the first week of July, 1944 an incident involving a U-Boat and the U.S. Naval Airship "K-14" occurred off Bar Harbor, Maine. As is made so painfully clear in the official Inquiry records, the U-Boat in question brought down the "K-14" with 20mm Anti-Aircraft fire resulting in the loss of six Airship crewmen out of a total compliment of ten men. The Inquiry and related intelligence reports also show that the "K-14" was somewhat successful in at least severely damaging the enemy vessel. Unfortunately, this incident was also kept secret for over 54 years.
Another situation occurred on 20 August of this year. The U-1229 was intercepted on the surface off the eastern edge of the Grand Banks by an American "Hunter-Killer" Naval Task Force as it was proceeding to the American coast on a 'spy-insertion' operation. The U-1229 went down with about one-third of her crew, but 41 survivors of this sinking wererescued as prisoners of war by the American destroyers on the scene.
What was not known by most military men at this time, however, was the fact that the Type XI U-Boat was also proceeding to the American coast - at that time located only 20 nautical miles distant from the U-1229 at the time of the latter's demise.
III. T H E "B L A C K K N I G H T"
According to the official design drafts laid out for the German Type XI-B U-Cruiser in 1939, the specifications for this vessel were as follows:
Length Overall:
115 meters (377 ft.) Breadth: 9.5 meters (31.3 ft.) Depth: 6.2 meters (20.3 ft.) Extreme Displacement: 3,630 tons Deadweight: 6,800 tons + Propulsion Machinery: 2-shaft diesel/electric motors,(eight 12cyl. diesel engines in two separate engine rooms), plus two high-grade electric motors in third compartment Armament: 4 torpedo tubes in the bow 2 torpedo tubes in the stern 6 torpedoes in ready-fire with 6 spare torpedoes carried below internal storage plates. Above-Deck Armament: 4 127mm Guns in two twin armored turrets. 2 37mm AA mounted on deck amidships. 2 20mm AA mounted in after Wintergarten. Ammunition Carried: 940 rounds total of 127mm. 4,000 rounds total of 37mm. 2,000 rounds total of 20mm. (all carried in 3 separate magazines) Crew: 110 men, with capability to carry an additional compliment of two company's' of "Special Coastal Troops", ('Brandenburgers') Cargo Capacity: 600 cubic tons above provisions. Accessories: 1 One-Man "Arado/Argus 231" reconnaissance seaplane stowed in forward vertical storage tube.
As detailed within the Kriegsmarine "K" Design Office, there were to be a total of four of these monstrous vessels laid down, with the possibility of constructing an additional four vessels should time and resources permit. However, it is known that only four keels were laid and that one was actually launched, the others eventually being scrapped prior to the end of the war before completion. The U-Boat Command intentions were to assign the numbers U-112 through U-115 to the first four vessels of the class. However, Kriegsmarine commissioning records reflect no such assignment of numbers and for all practical purposes the Type XI was never officially commissioned.
Very little is known about the Type XI-B U-Boat. All official histories state that the vessel type was never built and numerous publications indicate that the Type XI-B submarine design went only as far as a preliminary 'keel laying' at the building yards of Deschimag -A.G. Weser in Bremen, Germany. However, there is a subtle hint that at least one vessel of this type was indeed launched from the Deschimag yards. Contained within the records of the Military archive at Freiburgim-Breisgau, Germany is a brief mention of the "actual" yard trials in the Weser River of the Type XI U-Cruiser having attained a surface speed of 26 knots. This is supported to some degree by Eberhard Roessler's impressive publication "The U-Boat", in which this trial record is partly quoted. The details contained in the records of the Military archive in Germany make it very clear that the above speed trials were not obtained from 'tank' tests of models. Therefore, there certainly is s ome proof of the actual existence of a working and operational model of the legendary Type XI.
Amplified reports obtained from interviewed veterans of both the Allied and Axis intelligence services indicate very strongly that at some point during its existence, most probably in early 1944, the Type XI was berthed at the supposedly neutral ports of Vigo, Spain and Lisbon, Portugal on the Iberian Peninsula. These same sources have stated that the unofficial reference to the Type XI was "Die Schwarz Ritter", ("The Black Knight"). There is no official documentation of this but, considering the sources we must at least consider the high probability of these facts. It is certainly already well established that most of the clandestine activity directed by the Germans toward the Americas originated from the Iberian Peninsula, primarily through a German Industrial-Intelligence organization referred to as "www.archives.gov/publications/finding_aids/holocaust_era_assets/milit ary_agency_records_part_2.html+sofindus&hl=en>Sofindus".
Of primary importance in connection with this area of course are the German series of Special Operations known as "JOLLE", (translated as "Happy Boat") and "AKTION FEUERLAND", (meaning "Action Land-of-Fire", referring to the southern geographical area of Argentina). These two operations were intended to pave the way for German post-war survival. Noted Nazi leaders and war criminals were in the process of laying the financial foundation for a "Fourth Reich" within the borders of such countries as Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay and, most importantly for reasons of easy access, Argentina.
IV. C O N T R O L L E D P A N I C
As previously outlined within the 'Overview', the German Opposition groups were becoming increasingly bolder in their attempts at contacting the Western Allies through the various intelligence agencies. Those Opposition Group members associated with German Industrial concerns were the boldest, and possessed all the right connections to persuenegotiations for an acceptable armistice. The sole motive for the German Industrialists was obvious. They wished to maintain their corporate identity AND their financial assets for the post-war period. There were also many American Industrial concerns who wished to see this as well since a large percentage of ownership in these German companies were held by large American corporations - a blatant violation of the 'Trading With The Enemy Act'. The accessed research documents show that by June of 1944 there were no less than eight separate meetings between German Industrialists and agents of the Office of Strategic Se rvices. The most active American in these efforts was Allen W. Dulles, the OSS Chief of Station head quartered in the neutral city of Berne, Switzerland.
The professional background of Allen Dulles and his brother, John Foster Dulles, are most interesting. It seems that both men were heavily involved in pre-war dealings between American and German Corporations through their law firm of 'Sullivan & Cromwell' in New York City. It was these same pre-war German connections with which Allen Dulles wasnegotiating throughout the winter of 1943 and the summer/fall of 1944. All official documentation points to the fact that the Dulles brothers were not operating in the best interests of United States foreign policy, but were actually motivated through personal reasons to help in creating an acceptable form of armistice which would benefit most the German Industrialists directly. This also involved the safe guarding of certain German securities, which both John Foster and Allen Dulles actively assisted with - regardless of its direct violation of accepted U.S. Treasury and Presidential administration policy. In shor t the Dulles brothers, along with a handful of U.S. diplomats and intelligence operatives, helped Nazis and Anti-Nazis alike to hide negotiable securities from Allied confiscators and at the same time assisted in negotiating an end to the war along lines which were contrary to the "Unconditional Surrender" guidelines as set forth jointly by the three major Allies.
While all of these manipulations were going on within the Allied camp, Germany was desperately trying to protect what she had left of her industrial and monetary systems. Every day that passed without a negotiated armistice meant the further loss of property and post-war capability. It is well documented that major German corporations began making plans for the safeguarding of its resources in supposedly "neutral" countries while continuing to pursue diplomatic agendas.
Of particular note are the individual operations of German corporations. Firms such as I.G.Farben and Krupp Industries were known to have liquidated their stock holdings into either gold coin or bars by June of 1944 in anticipation of secreting these hard assets into the neutral countries of Switzerland, Lichenstein, Portugal and, most importantly - Argentina. Indeed, the Krupp concerns alone possessed vast estate holdings in Argentina and post-war records confirm that many millions worth of negotiable securities did make it to these estates via U-Boat transport for eventual deposit in the German controlled banks of Banco Aleman Transatlantico and Banco Tornquist.
What helped to speed up both the safe guarding of Germancorporate assets and attempts at armistice negotiations were thedecisions of the Breton Woods International Monetary Conference held at Breton Woods, New Hampshire between 1 - 20 July, 1944. Most of the Allied Nations represented at this conference voted for the dissolution of the Bank for International Settlements in Switzerland, a major money-launderer for the Nazis. With the loss of this particular bank the German corporations would find it much more difficult to move their ill-gotten profits out of Germany. On 9 July the Breton Woods Conference passed what is referred to as 'Resolution No. 6', which called for the dissolution of the Bank for International Settlements and the monitoring of the German movement of corporate wealth into neutral countries. Combined with a desperate need to negotiate an armistice this created a "Controlled Panic" situation within the German Industrial community.
When one studies the known movements of wealth and the options then open to both the German Anti-Nazi diplomats and Industrialists, it becomes obvious that drastic measures are indeed being planned. In September of 1944 a much delayed Finnish Intelligence report surfaced referring to a "Hitler Escape Boat" being made available at the port of Danzig, Poland as of early July. When one studies the details mentioned in this report there is only one conclusion: the alleged "Hitler Escape Boat" is none other than the Type XI-B U-Cruiser... the same vessel which was never officially commissioned into the Kriegsmarine. The very same vessel which is not supposed to even exist!
The long trail of records show that this vessel departed the port of Danzig, (Gdynia), on the afternoon of 20 July, 1944 - the same day as the assassination attempt on Adolph Hitler by the Nazi-Opposition. Records also indicate very strongly that the German Industrialists were behind the deployment of the Type XI-B U-Boat. One can only assume that the excuse for this vessel's existence in acting as a "Hitler Escape Boat" was only an accepted cover story for the benefit of the Nazi-Opposition, as quite obviously Hitler himself was not embarked on board the vessel at the time of its departure.
A "Controlled Panic" caused the Industrial Opposition to deploy this vessel as quickly as possible for a two-fold mission: to negotiate an acceptable armistice directly with U.S. representatives and to export to Argentina at least a portion of the German corporate securities. Thirty-Seven days later the Type XI-B U-Cruiser arrived off the Massachusetts coast - committed to her clandestine mission.
V. C O D E N A M E: "O B S C U R E C I N C H"
The date of 25 August, 1944 appeared to begin as any normal day along the Eastern Sea Frontier. But, the U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence had been continuously briefed over the past few days by the British Admiralty "ULTRA" of an "Unknown" U-Boat heading their way. On 15 August Admiralty informed U.S. Navy "COMINCH", (meaning Commander-In-Chief), that a U-Boat they had designated as "LT" was heading across the Atlantic and that they suspected it was on a "SPECIAL MISSION" since it was observing radio silence and not reporting its daily position, as was the normal routine among U-Boat Commanders of the time.
On the 17th. of August British Admiralty appears to be reasonably sure that the mystery vessel was bound to the American coast, but inquire further from U.S. "COMINCH" for any additional information that may help in their assessments. Simultaneously to this tracking the U.S. Navy was following the movements of the U-1229, designated as the "RJ", (Red Jig), which appeared to be running a parallel course to the mystery U-Boat.
By the 18th. British Admiralty admitted to U.S. "COMINCH" that the heading of "LT", (Love Tare), "REMAINS OPEN", suggesting that all are totally confused as to the subject vessel's actual destination and purpose.
Then on 20 August the U-1229 was successfully sunk by U.S. Naval forces just east of the Grand Banks, as stated within the "ULTRA" radio-intercept transmission, as follows:
"TWO OFFICERS AND ONE PROPAGANDIST AMONG 41 P/S FROM LOVE EASY x C.O. LOST x YOUR 1279 PARA 4 x LOVE TARE HEADING BAFFLING BUT BEST GUESS IS HE IS APPROACHING ST JOHNS AREA x THIS CONSISTENT WITH AMERICA II..."
Again, on the 21st. U.S. "COMINCH" requested further information from the British Admiralty concerning the unknown U-Boat in question by stating:
"WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR FURTHER VIEWS AND WHEN CONVENIENT COMMENT ON QUERIES MY 386 AND 387 x".
After comparing all of the pertinent documents to the numerous other operational intelligence material is becomes obvious that the "ULTRA" staff are completely unaware of the actual mission of the Type XI-B U-Cruiser, whereas certain other intelligence operatives are totally aware of the facts. This is a typical example of "need to know" restrictions between intelligence departments.
By the early evening of the 25th. it becomes obvious that the Type XI was successful in evading the U.S. Naval Task Forces east of the Grand Banks, as she surfaces at approximately 1600 hours just south of the Great Round Shoal Channel seven miles east of Great Point, Nantucket. Due to a submarine sighting by a commercial Pan-Am Plane at this time, the Naval Airship Squadron 'ZP-11' based at South Weymouth, Massachusetts orders the Naval Airship "K-25" to divert from its escort patrol 60 miles to the northeast and to investigate the reported sighting. Local vessels of the Northern Ship Lane Patrol are also ordered to the scene, which included two Coast Guard 83-footers and two 110 foot Sub-Chasers.
At this same time O.N.I. Telegrapher Preston Howley was monitoring the U-Boat's wireless transmission from the Office of Naval Intelligence Radio Intercept Station located at Chatham, Cape Cod, only fourteen miles to the northwest of the U-Boat's position. According to Howley, the transmission was originating from an "S-5" position, (Navalparlance meaning from a very close location), and was being sent out on a 'diplomatic B-Bar' signal. This meant that this particular German U-Boat was sending diplomatic messages in a "High Priority" status. Given what we now know about this vessel's mission parameters, this diplomatic message tends to run parallel with the established facts. Howley described the message as being sent in three parts lasting just a few minutes each and separated by approximately two or three minutes. The total message lasted perhaps twenty minutes, enough to fill three legal-size teletype pages of coding data.
O.N.I. Telegrapher Howley duly re-transmitted this message over his teletype to the U.S. Naval Cryptographic Center in Washington, D.C. Within half an hour the message bounced back to his station from Washington with the statement that they wished him to verify the coding and destination address, which he did. Howley verified the coding and address which, looking back on it fifty-four years later, he firmly believes was destined for the White House Map Room. The White House Map Room was not just the President's War Room during World War Two. It was also an intelligence center for combined services - managed by the Department of State itself. The implications of Howley's experiences and later assessments are obvious.
The following operations, which lasted over two days, are code named "OBSCURE CINCH" and "LADY BULL". According to the 'Official' record these "Special Searches" resulted in no activity and no confirmation of any subsequent action at the scene. The fact that these operations occurred at exactly the same location as the present location of the wreckage of the Type XI-B discovered in 1993, however, is extremely indicative. Veteran interviews have revealed that the subject U-Boat was actually sunk by the Naval Airship "K-25", with the small surface vessels conducting a 48 hour surface search for survivors and debris. The official records certainly tend to support the follow-up search for debris, often termed as a "Yankee Search".
Unfortunately, only a further declassification of existing"Operational" documents would provide additional insight into exactlywhat happened and how it happened.
VI. I N S E A R C H O F A G H O S T
The first hint of the existence of a U-Boat wreck off Cape Cod occurred in 1988, when now Trident President Edward Michaud heard for the first time the accepted stories of its demise off the Cape from a local tug-boat skipper named Warren LeGyte. Michaud had been running a sixty-one foot crew-boat out of Boston for the then ongoing MWRA OutfallProject. Every night Michaud and his fellow crewmen would bunk in Warrens 100 foot tug "Georgina A", then tied up at one of the East Boston docks. Since hearing of the legendary U-Boat, Ed would query Warren of what he knew of the vessel and its location. In due time the MWRA contracts would end and Michaud would eventually locate the various veterans who were involved in the original 1944 incident.
By June of 1993 Michaud had joined up with several dedicated professionals in an attempt to re-locate the legendary Cape Cod U-Boat and on the 5th. of that month the first hazy side scan sonar images of the wreckage were obtained. Equipment and financing, however, were slow in coming and it was 9 December of 1993 before any detailed sonar images of the wreck could be obtained.
Upon the initial discovery in June it was assumed by all involved in the project that the U-Boat located off Cape Cod was a standard German Type IX-C/40 submarine on a routine war patrol at the time of its loss. However, when the detailed sonar images were obtained in December it was immediately apparent that what had been found was indeed much larger in both length and bulk. After weeks of study and comparisons with knownGerman building plans it became obvious that what had been found was actually a submarine that, according to all known histories, was not supposed to exist! Michaud and his team had found a German Type XI-B U-Cruiser - in and of itself a major discovery.
By November of 1994 the first detailed sonar imagery of the Type XI armored gun-mounts were obtained utilizing E.G.&G sonar equipment. This left little doubt as to the vessel's structural confirmation. The following month of December brought with it a dive to the confirmed wreck site by Michaud and fellow diver Mike Turner. Although underwatervisibility was at an all time low of one foot, a total of fifteen small artifacts were recovered from around the wreck's pressure-hull. It was noticed that the wreck overall was heavily encased in huge drifts of sand ledges, as is to be expected in the area. As an example, just several miles to the west the 325 foot long wreckage of the steam-freighter "Dixie Sword" is almost completely covered in the same pattern of sand disposition.
In March of 1995 Michaud and his group incorporated as Trident Research & Recovery, Inc. and by June the new company had filed for, and received, exclusive rights of salvage for the German Type XI-B U-Boat in the First Federal District Court in Boston. Under this Admiralty claim, Civil Action No. 95-11374RCL, Trident continued its survey of the site. Of special interest to the company was the exact disposition of the wreckage and how this information correlated with the known research facts.
An Archaeologist was added to the survey team to insure proper methodology in the project. Additional Archivists and Researchers were consulted and the process of discovery continued both in the Archival repositories and on the site of the wreck itself.
VII.T O D A Y
As of August, 1997 Trident Research & Recovery, Inc. and Sub-Sea Research, Inc. of Portland, Maine combined their resources in order to bring the latter's experience, expertise and high technology ability to bear on the Project. Trident and Sub-Sea had been working jointly on other interesting research projects in the recent past, so it seemed only natural to combine the resources of both companies on the "Operation CA-35" Project.
The new Joint Venture will concentrate on obtaining video-tape footage of the Type XI-B wreck site and is presently planning on follow-up recovery operations. All vessel artifacts so recovered are slated for preservation and ultimate public display at the U.S.S. Salem Museum located in Quincy, Massachusetts. Needless to say, this should make for a rather impressive and informative stage for further public dissemination.
It should be noted that Trident has attempted on many occasions to open a dialogue with the respective offices of the U.S. Department of State, the Federal Republic of Germany and the U.S. Department of the Navy. All such requests for open discussion have gone ignored. It is hoped that in the near future this situation can be resolved. However, given the political revelations as described above, its really not very surprising that Government offices refuse to discuss this Project and its related investigations.
Several Senators and Congressmen have been notified by Trident in an attempt to both open such dialogues and assist in further investigations into the original 1944 incident. We at Trident and Sub-Sea believe that there will probably be more developments in this area as the Project moves forward.
As an additional note, if all of those very fine authors listed in Section "C" of the following Source Citations had been aware of the existence and deployment of the German Type XI-B there is no doubt that they too would have put the pieces together! Apparently, the missing link was the Type XI.
VIII. R E C E N T R E S E A R C H
There has been some very interesting revelations in the Project's follow-up of research data. Due to the efforts of contributing researcher Mr. Eric Brothers U.S. State Department Protocol documents are now available to confirm one of this investigation's long-standing curiosities - the visit of members of the Dutch Royal Family to Chatham, Cape Cod during the very same time-frame in which the German Type XI-B U-Boat was known to have been operational off Cape Cod. These documents consist of a series of notifications between the representatives of the Dutch Royal Family in exile and the Protocol Section of the Department of State. On the surface they do indeed appear to be routine in nature. It is only when viewed with the other known occurrences off Cape Cod at this time that these Protocol records seem to indicate more than just routine procedure.
For example: One of the most obvious details that stand out is the sudden departure from Chatham of Princess Juliana and her royal attendants on the morning of the 26th. of August, 1944, only hours after the known destruction of the Type XI fourteen miles to the southeast. This, combined with a published news report in the local Cape Cod Times for that date, quote the Princess as opening a short public statement upon her departure, stating: "I will not talk about anything political and cannot take questions". She goes on to say how the Royal Family enjoyed their stay at the Chatham Bars Inn, etc.
Within five minutes the impromptu interview is over and the Royal Family departs by car for Boston enroute to Canada. The fact that these State Department Protocol documents were only declassified at the time Mr. Brothers requested to view them in July of 1997 is possibly indicative - fifty four years after the fact.
To add to this new information Trident had conducted background research into the Dutch Royal Family due to its suspicions and has confirmed the following:
1) The Royal Consort, Prince Bernhardt, Husband of Juliana since 1937, was previous to their marriage an active card-carrying member of Hitler's black-shirted SS.
2) Prince Consort Bernhardt was employed prior to, during, and after the war by I.G.Farben's Industrial Espionage Unit "NW-7" which, needless to say, placed him under great suspicions by both the British and American intelligence communities. The mere fact of his employment as an "industrial spy" for Farben places him squarely within the sphere of the German Industrial community, links for which have already been established with the Type XI-B U-Boat.
There are many more details regarding the Dutch Royal Family, Prince Bernhardt, Princess Juliana and the German Industrialists which have not been included in this specific brief due to space considerations. However, the basic facts as listed above give very strong indications regarding the Dutch Royal visit to Cape Cod at this specific time in July and August of 1944. Suffice it to say that there is the very strong possibility that Prince Consort Bernhardt, through his wife Princess Juliana, may very well have been acting as a sort of liaison or facilitator in connections for Armistice Negotiations between German Industrialists and certain members of the American Department of State and Intelligence Community. The final proof for this is as yet not confirmed, but the stage is certainly set for such endeavors. Perhaps the amplified documentation for such a situation is contained within the hull of the Type XI off Cape Cod.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|
Saturday, July 01, 2006
 |
Current mood:  calm
Category: News and Politics
Say "the return" when discussing Haiti, and people who follow events in the country know you are talking about former President Jean-Bertrand Aristide returning from his exile in South Africa. Mr. Aristide was ousted in a coup d'etat in February 2004, and flown, against his will, in a U.S. government plane to the Central African Republic. He has since settled in South Africa, at the government's invitation, but has always said he will return to Haiti when the conditions are right. The conditions are getting closer to right, although President Aristide would now return as a private citizen. President René Preval was elected on February 7 and inaugurated on May 14, 2006. His Ministers were ratified by Parliament on June 7, replacing the brutal and unconstitutional Interim Government that had ruled since the coup. Haiti's Constitution limits presidents to two non-consecutive terms, and President Aristide's second term ended in February. The prospect of President Aristide's return generates passionate reactions, both for and against, in Haiti, but also in Washington and other world capitols. The return is usually debated in terms of President Aristide's likely role in Haitian political life, but the controversy raises two important questions beyond politics- what right does everyone have to weigh in on a private Haitian citizen's decision to live inside his country or out? And what does the controversy say about the much broader issue of return- of the return of full democracy and sovereignty to Haiti. President Preval is asked about the return incessantly by the foreign press, and he gives a simple answer: as he told France's Le Monde on Tuesday, "the decision is not mine to make." He cites Article 41 of Haiti's Constitution, which declares that "no individual of Haitian nationality can be deported or forced to leave the country for any reason whatsoever," and Article 41-1 which adds that "no Haitian needs a visa to leave the country or to return to it." President Preval affirms that he intends to comply with Articles 41 and 41-1, as with all the articles of Haiti's Constitution. Several commentators have mentioned that President Aristide would have to face any legal action against him if he returns to Haiti, or if he goes to the U.S. That is true of any citizen in any country, but is independent of the right to come home. Moreover, although the foreign press has reported extensively on criminal investigations against President Aristide in both Haiti and the U.S., there are no criminal charges against him in either country. The Interim Government and its allies made many serious accusations of criminal activity against President Aristide to the press, but not a single one to the Haitian justice system in two years. The Interim authorities did file a civil complaint against Mr. Aristide and several others in Federal Court in Miami. They launched an impressive public relations campaign, including press conferences, Washington briefings and seminars to accompany the filing. But they did not actually pursue the case in court- eight months after filing the complaint (the first step), not a single defendant has ever been served with the complaint (the second step, usually done immediately). A U.S. grand jury has spent two years investigated drug trafficking and money laundering between Port-au-Prince and Miami, and although the "smoking gun" against President Aristide has been announced several times in the press, not a single charge has issued from the courthouse. Articles 41 and 41-1 should dispose of the discussion of the return, but once again Haiti's Constitution is not allowed the last word. The countries that used their financial and military clout to remove President Aristide back in 2004- the U.S., Canada and France- are now using their diplomatic clout to keep him out. The U.S., once again, is taking the lead, with its trademark faithfulness to a consistent sound bite. Before the votes from the February 7 Presidential elections had even arrived at election headquarters, Acting U.S. Ambassador Tim Carney predicted that the election "is going to demonstrate . how Jean Bertrand Aristide is a man of the past." Later that week, State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters that Aristide "is in South Africa, and I would expect that he would stay there," and that "we think the Haitian government should be looking forward to their future, not to its past." Deputy State Department Spokesman Adam Ereli added: "our understanding is that the government of Haiti is looking forward, not looking back. They've got a democracy to build, and the future is not in the past. Aristide is from the past" (all italics supplied). This message was echoed far beyond the Bush Administration. Former Assistant Secretary of State Roger Noriega declared that for Preval, Aristide's return "would be the end of his ability to run the country." Lawrence Pezzullo, President Clinton's special envoy to Haiti warned "if [Preval] brings Aristide back, that thing will blow up." The International Crisis Group added that Aristide's return "would be a very polarizing and divisive event that could fatally damage the effort to move Haiti forward.'' None of these experts even mentioned that it was Aristide's removal in 2004 that led to unprecedented violence- thousands of deaths- not to mention the reversal of ten years' hard won democratic progress. France's Minister for Cooperation and Development, Brigitte Girardin, visited South Africa in April, and opposing Aristide's return was high on her agenda for discussions with Foreign Minister Foreign Minister Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma. Canada, France, and even some South American countries buttonholed South African President Thabo Mbeki when he went to Chile for President Michelle Bachelet's March inauguration, to tell him not to allow Aristide's return. The fact that such a broad spectrum of non-Haitian officials and commentators feel they can pressure Haiti's government to deprive a citizen of his Constitutional right to live in his homeland raises an obvious question: how much has democracy actually returned to Haiti, and how much democracy will the international community allow? There are few, if any, precedents of the world's powerful countries keeping a former elected President out of his own country, but that level of interference is routine for Haiti. On February 17, 2004, as insurgents took over cities in the north of Haiti, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell reaffirmed that President Aristide was Haiti's constitutional President, and announced that the U.S. "cannot buy into a proposition that says the elected President must be forced out of office by thugs and those who do not respect law and are bringing terrible violence to the Haitian people." But twelve days later, Mr. Powell's State Department forced President Aristide onto a plane, delivering Haiti to thugs who brought terrible violence to the Haitian people- over 4,000 killed, hundreds of political dissidents imprisoned illegally, and a deadly increase in hunger and disease. The United Nations, with a Charter proclaiming "respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples," declined the elected government's request for help before the coup. But within a few hours of President Aristide's departure, and on a Sunday morning to boot, the UN Security Council had authorized a military mission to Haiti, not to restore the Constitutional authorities, but to consolidate their overthrow. The Organization of American States, which had a newly-minted Inter-American Democratic Charter designed to respond to threats against the democratic order of member states, never once criticized the coup. If Haiti's former President has trouble traveling into Haiti, its current Prime Minister, Jacques-Edouard Alexis has trouble traveling out. Canada announced in early May that he was barred from the country because his name is on a list of people accused of "crimes against humanity." The Canadian government admits it has no specific evidence against Mr. Alexis. It makes vague reference to the Carrefour Feuilles massacre, a police killing of suspected gang members during Mr. Alexis' previous tenure as Prime Minister in 1999. Ironically, Mr. Alexis' government aggressively prosecuted that massacre- several top police officials were convicted of murder and imprisoned- and the UN and human rights groups hailed the prosecution as a major step in fighting large-scale human rights violations. Canada claims to be sorry and to be looking into the matter, but almost two months after the issue was first raised, Mr. Alexis' name is still on the list. Imagining analogous treatment among the world's powerful countries is difficult: England's Prime Minister Tony Blair pressuring President Bush to restrict former Vice-President Gore's anti-war speeches, because he "is a man of the past." Or the U.S. Ambassador to France warning against the "divisive" socialist Parliamentarians who called for a vote of no-confidence against the French government last month. In Canada, lawyers and human rights groups did present extensive evidence of George Bush's responsibility for war crimes and crimes against humanity ahead of his December 2004 visit. Of course the Canadian government declined to invoke its laws barring entry of human rights violators- the very laws it did apply to Mr. Alexis- despite the ample evidence for Mr. Bush, and the lack of any for Mr. Alexis. Haitians have a marketplace expression for double standard- de pwa, de mezi (literally "two weights, two measures"), that gets frequent use in discussions about the international community's treatment of their country. Haitians with varying levels of approval for President Aristide's tenure in office agree that his forced exile is yet another example of de pwa de mezi -powerful countries that preach respect for human rights, the rule of law and national sovereignty declining to apply those principles when they stand in the way of want they want to do with Haiti. So for them, President Aristide's physical return is one part of a broader return of Haiti to a complete democracy, and to a sovereignty respected by the rest of the world. In this broader return, there would be no more need to argue about a former President coming home, any more than there is in the rest of the world.
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|
|
|
|