MySpace


Doc



Last Updated: 11/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 35
Sign: Gemini

City: GREENVILLE
State: SOUTH CAROLINA
Country: US
Signup Date: 7/15/2006

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Thursday, June 28, 2007 

Current mood:  blank

via:   


Le Soleil de Québec


Presse canadienne

Montréal

Le gouvernement Charest a annoncé, jeudi, quelques bonifications au régime de prêts et bourses pour compenser son dégel des droits de scolarité à l'université.




..> ..>










Ces frais seront haussés de 50 $ par session ou 100 $ par année et ce pendant cinq ans.

Pour compenser cette augmentation du fardeau financier, le régime des prêts et bourses sera amélioré.

Ainsi, pour calculer le montant des prêts et bourses auquel un étudiant a droit, les frais de subsistance, qui tiennent compte de diverses dépenses encourues par les étudiants, seront indexés au coût de la vie en 2007-2008.

De même, pour effectuer ce calcul, on haussera le montant auquel les étudiants ont droit pour du matériel scolaire, ce qui inclura l'Internet.

Le gouvernement réduira également de 10 % la contribution parentale aux études du jeune pour fins du calcul.

La ministre de l'Éducation, Michelle Courchesne, qui a fait cette annonce, a précisé que 70 000 étudiants verront ainsi augmenter le montant de leur aide financière.

Les différentes mesures annoncées totaliseront 31,2 millions $ pour l'année scolaire 2007-2008.

Les droits de scolarité pour un étudiant québécois à plein temps passeront ainsi de 1668 $ en 2006-2007 à 2168 $ en 2011-2012.

La ministre de l'Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport a tenu à souligner que même après les hausses des droits de scolarité annoncées, en 2011-2012, le Québec «sera encore nettement en bas de la moyenne canadienne».

Par la même occasion, la ministre Courchesne a annoncé la tenue d'une consultation visant à encadrer les frais afférents, ces frais de toutes sortes qui sont imposés aux étudiants. Ces frais, de plus, varient grandement d'une université à l'autre.

La consultation débutera le 27 août et durera six semaines.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007 

Current mood:  aggravated
Via the NY TIMES


Op-Ed Contributor

Death by Veganism

Published: May 21, 2007

WHEN Crown Shakur died of starvation, he was 6 weeks old and weighed 3.5 pounds. His vegan parents, who fed him mainly soy milk and apple juice, were convicted in Atlanta recently of murder, involuntary manslaughter and cruelty.


Jacob Magraw-Mickelson

This particular calamity — at least the third such conviction of vegan parents in four years — may be largely due to ignorance. But it should prompt frank discussion about nutrition.

I was once a vegan. But well before I became pregnant, I concluded that a vegan pregnancy was irresponsible. You cannot create and nourish a robust baby merely on foods from plants.

Indigenous cuisines offer clues about what humans, naturally omnivorous, need to survive, reproduce and grow: traditional vegetarian diets, as in India, invariably include dairy and eggs for complete protein, essential fats and vitamins. There are no vegan societies for a simple reason: a vegan diet is not adequate in the long run.

Protein deficiency is one danger of a vegan diet for babies. Nutritionists used to speak of proteins as "first class" (from meat, fish, eggs and milk) and "second class" (from plants), but today this is considered denigrating to vegetarians.

The fact remains, though, that humans prefer animal proteins and fats to cereals and tubers, because they contain all the essential amino acids needed for life in the right ratio. This is not true of plant proteins, which are inferior in quantity and quality — even soy.

A vegan diet may lack vitamin B12, found only in animal foods; usable vitamins A and D, found in meat, fish, eggs and butter; and necessary minerals like calcium and zinc. When babies are deprived of all these nutrients, they will suffer from retarded growth, rickets and nerve damage.

Responsible vegan parents know that breast milk is ideal. It contains many necessary components, including cholesterol (which babies use to make nerve cells) and countless immune and growth factors. When breastfeeding isn't possible, soy milk and fruit juice, even in seemingly sufficient quantities, are not safe substitutes for a quality infant formula.

Yet even a breast-fed baby is at risk. Studies show that vegan breast milk lacks enough docosahexaenoic acid, or DHA, the omega-3 fat found in fatty fish. It is difficult to overstate the importance of DHA, vital as it is for eye and brain development.

A vegan diet is equally dangerous for weaned babies and toddlers, who need plenty of protein and calcium. Too often, vegans turn to soy, which actually inhibits growth and reduces absorption of protein and minerals. That's why health officials in Britain, Canada and other countries express caution about soy for babies. (Not here, though — perhaps because our farm policy is so soy-friendly.)

Historically, diet honored tradition: we ate the foods that our mothers, and their mothers, ate. Now, your neighbor or sibling may be a meat-eater or vegetarian, may ferment his foods or eat them raw. This fragmentation of the American menu reflects admirable diversity and tolerance, but food is more important than fashion. Though it's not politically correct to say so, all diets are not created equal.

An adult who was well-nourished in utero and in infancy may choose to get by on a vegan diet, but babies are built from protein, calcium, cholesterol and fish oil. Children fed only plants will not get the precious things they need to live and grow.

Nina Planck is the author of "Real Food: What to Eat and Why."

Tuesday, January 30, 2007 
We need to realize that having running water, electricity, a Walmart on evey corner(Oh god did I really say that) is a blessing. Get a F@#@ING grip people.

Fact is, we are the largest group of ungrateful, spoiled brats the world has ever seen.  No wonder the world loves the U.S. yet has a great disdain for its citizens.  They see us for what we are.  The most blessed people in the world who do nothing but complain about what we don't have and what we hate about the country instead of thanking the good Lord we live here.

DEEP BREATH. For those who may be wondering I encountered a vey anoying, whiney, A@# today. While enjoying my lunch I had the misfortune of being asked my opinion of how bad the President is doing. How bad the war is. How much better things would be if such and such were in office etc..... Needless to say I think I handled the situation with dignity and guile. I said " Thank God we  live in America" and walked away. In reality I wanted to punch the A@# but that would lead to unfourtunate conciquences. Now I am venting.