Vermont- damned, determined to impeach Bush..:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />

Small towns, like Brattleboro and Marlboro have tried unsuccessfully to impeach President Bush. Even trying to pass a law that if President Bush or VP Cheney enters each town, they could be arrested.

Now, a woman running for Vermont Attorney General- Charlotte Dennett, says if elected, she will prosecute Bush for murder.

William Sorrel, who is the current Attorney General for Vermont and running for reelection, claims the Vermont AG cannot charge a random person for a crime- if the crime didn't take place within the state of Vermont.

(State Attorney General's are limited to crimes within their state.)

This isn't stopping progressive candidate- Charlotte Dennett. She claims that because the military actively recruited folks from Vermont, (and of course- "Bush lied and people died") this gives her the right to file charges.

An Attorney general can file charges for all kinds of stuff, whatever floats their boat. But it may never move forward.

First, she would have to prove why Vermont has the RIGHT to prosecute a person, when the said crime never took place within her state. Second, Bush lied: difficult to prove when so many other world leaders and professionals also believed Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. (Trust me..!! If it could be proven that Bush lied, democrats would have brought on charges 3 years ago.)

As with many on the left, Charlotte Dennett's anger is misdirected. She is angry with President Bush for the War in Iraq. However, President Bush made no bones about what he wanted to do: Saddam needed to allow Hanns Blix to inspect all of Iraq, or Saddam would be removed.

If Charlotte Dennett is upset over the Iraq War, she should go after the democrats who voted with Bush to allow this war to take place. After all, why did she vote for these democrats if they are NOT going to protect her (anti-war) interests..??

I wonder if Charlotte Dennett will also go after President Madison for the War of 1812..??

Maybe then she could take after President Jefferson for the War with Tripoli..??

She would have problems prosecuting all three presidents:

President Bush received congressional approval to remove Saddam, and Saddam's military was shooting at American pilots- (which falls within constitutional authority for war.)

She would have problems prosecuting Madison and Jefferson because these men WROTE THE constitution that Charlotte Dennett is squatting down and pissing on.

(Plus, Madison and Jefferson are both dead.)

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080919/ap_on_el_st_lo/prosecuting_bush_2

He leaned forward in his chair, as if to take command. His political party's "talking point" was firmly planted in his brain.

When the moment was right, he declared:

"You know, we cannot drill our way out of it.."

Is anyone else getting sick of this talking point..??

"We cannot drill our way out of it.."

What makes it even more sad and pathetic is that each person who uses this talking point acts like they are the FIRST to say it.

"We cannot drill our way out of it.."

Oh….

It makes me want to puke.

Mainly because it is such a lie.

We can drill our way out of "it."

We have enough coal in America to power the country for 100 years. If every electrical power plant was either coal, nuclear, or hydro (wind, solar powered)- we would not need oil for electricity. If every American who only drives 200 miles a day, ( to work, to the store, etc) drove an electric car, we would be able to "drill and dig our way out of it.."

It is estimated that 50 percent of Americans could drive an electric car. The batteries in modern electric cars would last long enough for the day to day driving.

If that were to take place, there would be enough oil to power the rest of the Americans vehicles.

Do we need the government to pass some kind of new law..??

Hell no..!!

Get the freaking government out of the way. The government is part of the problem. The free market will solve our problems. Today, with the high cost of gas, people are using mass transit more than ever. Also, motorcycle stores are having trouble keeping "scooters" in stock. A scooter gets 100 mpg, costs around $2,000 bucks, and can get a person around a city.

We do not need any NEW laws on fuel, in fact; we need the government to loosen up a few laws they wrote years ago.

Yes we can drill and dig our way out of it.

The free market will cause people to choose what transportation vehicle suits their economic situation. Some will choose mass transit, others will walk or bike, some will buy smaller cars.

This alone will not solve our problems.

We need an education system that doesn't teach "history lessons" and political correctness.

Everything taught in schools should center around "facts", not how the lesson illustrates global warming, racism, or condoms.

We need educated people in this country if we are ever going to find a new power source.

We have relied on the gasoline engine, in America, for about 100 years. We know we have about 100 years of coal and oil to power our countries future needs.

Instead of teaching kids how to put on a condom, shouldn't we teach math and science? (When you think about it, a condom isn't that tough to figure out how to use?)

Instead of teaching kids about global warming, shouldn't we teach kids how to read and write? (If a child can read and communicate, they will learn about global warming because the information is freaking everywhere.)

Instead of teaching kids about the gay lifestyle, shouldn't we dive a little deeper into engineering, science, and how things work?

We have children trapped in a school system for twelve years. Beyond that, most children are on their own.

We are pissing away these twelve years by teaching morality lessons on the "gay lifestyle", global warming, and how to install a condom.

For a group of people who claim they want separation of church and state, I have never seen so much emphasis on teaching morality in school, in my lifetime. The morality of homosexuals, political correctness, global warming, and how to install a condom.

Yes we can drill, dig, and educate our way out of this.

But we need to start now.

We have watched President Clinton and Al Gore spend 8 years of our time and do nothing for the environment or energy.

We have watched President Bush and the republicans in congress spend 7 years of our time and they have done nothing for our energy problems.

I'm not willing to say that the democrats are in bed with the oil companies. Nor am I willing to say that republicans are either. But clearly, both parties do not want to tackle this problem.

Yes we can drill our way out of it.

But it looks like we, "the people" will have to grab the democratic and republican politicians by the hand and lead them into the future.

I would say, just leave the politicians behind in the past. But unfortunately, they are the idiots who write our laws.

(Who exactly, are the idiots..??)

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republican

"If America forgets where she came from, if the people lose sight of what brought them along, if she listens to the deniers and mockers, then will begin the rot and dissolution." — Carl Sandburg, American writer (1878-1967).

Welcome,

The first picture is called-

Hey, who took my "new."

The picture was done for an editorial I wrote in which I talk about the 5 things that Barack Obama did wrong. (Post called "Obama- what went wrong.")

Poor Obama was the NEW thing in politics. But that was 2 years ago.

Looks like someone else took Obama's New-ness.

My latest "Sick Rick's Pic" (picture) is called:

"Pigs and Lipstick"

I guess this picture needs no explaining. Other than it was done in humor.

(note) I had nothing to do with the "doll." I'm not really sure if there is a Sarah Palin doll..??

My next picture is called:

"Oprah and Obama- They've got a THING going on."

This picture is based on the fact that Oprah will not let Sarah Palin on her show.

Oprah interviewed Barack Obama.

You might be tempted to say that Oprah doesn't want to give advertising to "our side" of the political fence.

You would be wrong.

Oprah interviewed Bill O'Reilly.

Clearly, Oprah doesn't care to LEARN anything about Palin. Which is a shame because- like it or not, Palin is on the verge of raising the bar for women.

But Oprah is not interested.

So I took it a step futher.

If Oprah were a republican, White, and refusing to allow a Black woman on her show, people would scream "racism."

So that is what we did with this picture.

Who's your daddy?

Liberals live in this child-like world where utopia is "just around the corner." Utopia is fine, wouldn't we all love to be there. But the solution that liberals have for reaching utopia is by force. Not by choice.

The liberal plan is flawed from the beginning. It relies on Forced Higher Taxes. Forced Doctors. Forced size of cars we can drive. Forced wattage of light bulbs we can use. Forced amount of toilet paper we can have in our house. Forced temperature of our house...

Force- no matter how loosely you define it, is not freedom, nor is it utopia…

I'm trying to explain to a liberal how I view national health care. Being a conservative, liberals ask me- "how can you let 50 million Americans go without health care? How can you sleep at night knowing you will vote against a national health plan? What about those sick babies..??"

We all get this question.

All of us conservatives will be confronted like this.

You take the logical approach:

You explain that we cannot afford a national health plan right now. Medicaid and Medicare are in trouble NOW- today. Within 15 years, there will not be enough money going in- to pay for the medical treatment that people will need. 15 YEARS- (That's all the time we have left)… This problem will effect everyone reading this editorial.

Social Security

We cannot start a new program (a National Health Plan) BEFORE we fix the old ones.

If we start a national health plan now, it will be run half-assed because the money isn't there to run the program correctly.

You will get the "blank stare", like a deer in a car's headlight.

"But other countries have a national health plan, why are we so backward that we cannot afford one..??"

A child doesn't want to know "How to pay for it." The child just wants it- and they want it now. That is all the child wants to know about the whole situation.

Daddy, can we get a second car because I will be 16 soon and all the other kids will have cars?

They do not want to know the mechanics on "how." Nor do they want to personally work for it. They are happy if "other people" pay for it. They want it NOW, and they do not want to talk about the ramifications of this choice.

Let's move to global warming:

We conservatives, are trying to be logical and use facts. But we are getting nowhere because we are talking to children.

Let's try one more…

Liberals do not want to get involved in the mechanics of a program or the details of history. They treat the taxpayers like a servant or a butler. Liberals proclaim: "Get me a health care plan. I need it now.."

However, in typical elitist, child- like fashion…

When a program gets in trouble, a program that democrats created, (Social Security) they do not blame themselves for an ill-conceived pyramid scheme. They blame the current servants (the tax payers)- "..how did you screw up social security? Fix it now, I command you.."

Liberals are like the children of the elite.

A child will reach an age, (it could be 16, or 36, or 66) when they will not "willingly" accept knowledge from you anymore. They MUST learn it on their own.

I am almost, (but not completely) convinced that most children are born with liberal tendencies. They do not understand how things work. Most stuff is magical in their minds. Bad things must be a "conspiracy" because there is no way bad things could "just happen."

Liberals live in this child-like world where utopia is "just around the corner." Utopia is fine, wouldn't we all love to be there. But the solution that liberals have on reaching utopia is by force. Not by choice.

The liberal plan is flawed from the beginning. It relies on Forced Higher taxes. Forced Doctors. Forced size of cars we can drive. Forced wattage of light bulbs we can use. Forced amount of toilet paper we can have in our house. Forced temperature of our house...

Force- no matter how loosely you define it, is not freedom, nor is it utopia.

The child demands- "Get me a health plan and get it now.."

The adult warns- "Let's talk about this first. How will we pay for it? Will the system be better? How will the higher taxes effect people who are already over-taxed?"

If you cannot understand what I am talking about, you must head back into the world and experience more of it. And I ask you this question- "Who's your daddy..??"

If you understand what I am saying here in this editorial, welcome to conservatism..!!

We have been waiting for you.

Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republican

Global Warming MUST be true, (Unless it isn't)

The 12th Angry Republican Video Broadcast

Pennsylvania gets Invaded

The 11th Angry Republican Video Broadcast

Trying to understand liberals, because every other word is "beeped."

"Look into Hillary’s eyeball. (I dare you..!!)"