MySpace

Join Team Kane!



¤ Idiot Savant
¤ High-Tech Lowlife
¤ Uppity Know-It-All
¤ Homeless Bumstress
¤ Smart-Mouth Smartass
¤ Doesn't care if you don't like it !
Helping My Geeky Nerd Brothers Remember Who They Are
FAYE'S CAVE
THE ASTRONOMY / PHYSICS FUCK SITE
The Church of the Latter-Day Zarathustra
FAQ
Naked pix
My true fuck story
My Religion. My Bible
The purpose of this blog
I live in a cave in the woods
My porn library helps you remember 		_

Angular Momentum
They call me the recursively enumerated, insufficiently remunerated, double data rated, triple X-rated, psycho, active, psychoactive, hyperbolic, hypergolic, St. Vitus' dancin', pull down her pants and low class, kiss my ass, underemployed, overjoyed, masterpiece-makin', masturbatin', window ledge over-the-edge, screwy, chiral, downward-spiral, ass upended, fair-weather-friended, 'puter freq girl geek

I don't read myspace mail, so use fayekanegallery@hotmail.com. I answer ALL emails, but reserve the right to publish it with your name changed. Yes, yes, I'll talk about being naked and whipped, but I'd much rather talk about the signature of the interval metric in special relativity.
X

Linear Momentum		X

THE GEEKIER, THE BETTER SUBJECT INDEX SORT BY DATE THE HIGHER, THE FEWER

MySpace.com | rss | sign in
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 


Jeezis christ, I have trouble believing this is real

5:50 AM 
5 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 
What country is this?  Who's geting paid here, the girls or the guys or both?  It looks like a real club. How come there are no geeky, clothed guys? 

Are there places girls can go, strip completely naked on the dance floor and the guys are hired to fuck them?  How come sexy, young girls are there? They can get laid anytime.  Even I could have, once.  And how come ONLY sexy, young girls are there? Do the keep old ladies like me out? What do the red bracelets mean?



'Talkin' 'bout THIS. 

And THIS one's even better.  The young, completely naked girl in most of the middle of the clip, did she pay to get in there?  Is the whole thing staged for the camera?  It can't be; there are too many people fucking in the background who never get filmed up close.  It's gotta be a real club.



Right?



Or WTF???

There's a URL in one of them, http://chipgays.com/ph (which myspace hasn't censored yet!)
But I don't think it tells what's actually happening.


5:06 AM 
11 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 





These are the ceramic balloon molds that I fucked my slave with in both her pussy and her ass.  I fucked her pussy with the large one while she was manacled and chained standing in the firewood box. 



The large one is two balloon molds held together with an aluminum rod epoxied inside with Devcon 2-ton epoxy.



He made an ass-plug, just for her:
I also fuck her with Mr. Gnarly, which I made out of two part silicone resin:



I also used my slave's pussy to hold this drinking glass.  I fucked her with it until she came.  Then I tied ribbons around the knobby feet and then tied the ribbons around her thighs to hold the glass inside her pussy. 



When you put something cold inside the glass she can soon feel the cold insider her pussy too.  Sorry, no photos yet as the camera has gone to shit.  But she will be serving me my beer like this at a play party soon and I will have photos.

Great! 
Thriller, add a light or use a flash for inside her little love-nest!

And I bet the guys would like to see a picture of her cunt!

2:55 AM 
9 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 
No one comes or goes except a couple time a year, in summer.  For at LEAST six months, the prestigious scientists are cut off from the world.

Whether it's day or night outside tells the time of year, not the time of day.  Here's a pic of all of them sitting around drinking at 8:45, presumably PM but hopefully, AM. 

What's the first thing you notice?



That's right, the girl in the middle!

Can you imagine how popular she must be?

And look how slobbery drunk that guy had to get before he had the nerve to talk to her!  I bet the reason SHE drinks is so she can put up with all the passes the guys make.

And notice that while the beer and wine flow, there's no liquor.  I bet that's a rule, and I bet most of the guys sneak a few bottles in their luggage.  I wonder if anyone gets high?  I doubt it.  Only in college do the majority of people think smoking dope is okay.

Since all these scientists are certified disease-free, if she's on the pill, she can fuck anyone anywhere without protection.   GOD, if I were her, I'm make it known that I'll fuck ANY of the guys ANY time, ANYwhere on the facility, and I'd throw a contest every weekend where everyone gets drunk and they see who can fuck me in the strangest place.  And no, I don't mean "my ass hole" (though I'm sure it would get plenty of use).  I mean like, outside on top of the radar dome.

But I bet she's too SOPHISTICATED for that!  That's why being "sophisticated" is BULL shit.

She probably has one guy she fucks at the south pole without telling her boyfriend back home, and she lets everyone know she fucks him to keep the other guys away. 

If she will date the guys, how many shy, hesitant geeks do you think fuck up by trying to talk to her?  And for the non-geek ones who never forgot who they are, where the hell do they go on a date, besides his bed, and what do they do besides fuck?  Go to the ballet?

I wonder if the guys all have massive porn collections on their computers, but with the files renamed as science data sets.  I bet they DO hide that shit because other people have access to his PC, like the geeky tech guy who installs new software.  I bet at least ONE guy has digitally pasted her face pic on one of a naked-girl body.

Maybe the guys download naked fuck vids of underage girls because they know the best the FBI can do is trace it to their station and not any individual.  I bet most guys encrypt their yank fuel and put it in the c:..windows..system32 directory with a DLL extension. 

Maybe they have a communal porn library on the central server they don't tell the girls about.

Wouldn't it be a muhh-fuhh if the only two girls at the facility were both lesbians who roll around naked with each other on that round coffee table as entertainment for the guys, but won't let the guys touch them!  Do you think the guys would take out their dicks and yank in front of each other, or would they discreetly excuse themselves and go do it in whatever little cubby hole they sleep in?

And if the latter, do you think the other guys smirk because they know why the guy's leaving before the end of the performance, or do they not, because they can't WAIT to do the same thing?

As an autistic, I'm no expert at what other people feel.  But my guess is that the other guys wouldn't even notice because they're only paying attention to the two naked girls doing 69.

And what about showers?  I doubt they have a separate shower room just for a couple of women. They probably have aseveral compartmentalized "unisex" shower modules.  If so, I wonder if the girl in the pic has to look at men's cum all over the shower stall.  I also wonder if some of the men leave it there for her on purpose, knowing she'll have to look at it.

And I wonder if she checks for hidden cameras in the bathroom and shower.  Here in The Future, color TV cameras can be TINY, as in "looks like a hat pin".  And if it transmitted omnidirectionally, no one would know who did it if it gets found!

If she DID find one and reported it to the head guy, I wonder if he'd examine everyone's computer to see who has naked yank pix of the girl, or if he'd post a notice admonishing whoever it was, or if he'd just tell her "look, these things HAPPEN when you're in the middle of 30 healthy guys who haven;t fucked a girl in six months."

I wonder if any of them ever considered asking the other guys to go along with stealing all her clothes and insisting she walk around naked all the time.  Sure, they'd get in SHIT trouble back home, but they could get away with it for a whole half-a-year, particularly if they kept her away from the radio.

I bet some guys yank off thinking about how easy it would be to keep her as a sex slave tied up in a storage locker and tell NOAA that she was eaten by a walrus or a penguin or whatever the fuck they have down there.

GOD she's a lucky girl!!!

12:53 AM 
2 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Monday, November 23, 2009 
I wondered about that, since I've read so many cases of two people having a normal relationship, but because the government doesn't like it, they imprison the man for many years, destroying not just his life, but their love--just like they used to do with homosexuals and black/white sex.  So I looked it up.

Is it legal for juries to ignore the law and substitute their own judgment? Yes, in the sense that there can be no criminal penalty for doing so and no reversal of a jury’s decision to acquit. Once a verdict is delivered, the double jeopardy clause protects the accused from reprosecution even if the jury’s verdict was a result of nullification. And a juror who steadfastly maintains that he simply wasn’t convinced by the evidence cannot be accused of any wrongdoing, no matter how thin his story may be. So while ignoring the law is not what the jury is supposed to do, the practical fact is that jurors cannot be stopped from doing it. In that sense, it’s legal.

Parenthetically, we should note that potential jurors are typically subject to questioning before being chosen for a jury, in a process called voir dire. A juror who can be shown to have lied during this process, perhaps by concealing his views about the laws at issue, can be subsequently charged with a crime, although it won’t affect the verdict rendered in the original case. Even then, it can be an uphill climb for the prosecution, as we learn from the case of Laura Kriho, selected to sit on a Colorado jury in 1996.

The defendant was accused of drug possession, and in voir dire Kriho did not mention her own previous conviction on possession charges; she also failed to disclose her membership in something called the Boulder Hemp Initiative Project, a group supporting the legalization of marijuana in Colorado. During jury deliberations, Kriho was the lone holdout for acquittal. She tried to persuade her fellow jurors that drug cases should be handled by the family and community, not by the courts, and that the jury had the right to create new law and to refuse to convict. Ultimately the judge declared a mistrial. After other jurors reported Kriho’s conduct to the judge, she was charged with contempt of court and found guilty.

Can the judge override the jury’s decision? Sometimes. If the jury’s decision is to convict in spite of insufficient evidence, the judge may direct a verdict of acquittal and override the jury. But the reverse is not true: if the jury acquits, the judge cannot reverse the acquittal.

During jury selection, the court is entitled to know if you can follow its instructions with respect to the law, and either side can ask that you be dismissed for cause if you cannot. Indeed, if you cannot, the judge can dismiss you sua sponte­ (before the trial)  ­even if neither side asks.

So the answer is that even if you can't convince the other jurors, you can hang the jury out of principle as long as you don't say so.  No one can force you to change your vote, but judges have a way of keeping a jury deliberating forever when this happens, so you have to be really motivated to resist overwhelming peer pressure not to declare an obviously guilty defendant innocent.

Also, you have to tell everyone--EVERYONE-- that you're doing it because you really believe the guy is innocent, since if you lie about having strong feelings on the subject when they select you, you'll be charged with perjury.
 
10:46 PM 
13 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Monday, November 23, 2009 
A tempest swirls in the tabloid teapot about the sexual orientation of Tom Cruise. Cruise has promised to sue anyone who publicly claims that he is gay. Let's assume Tom is straight; there is certainly no evidence to the contrary. But, as several commentators have noted, that still leaves the question of why, in the year 2009, the sexual orientation of a Hollywood leading man is such a big deal.

Think about it. There are no openly gay male film stars. There are openly gay actors, but they are character and comic-relief types, not leading men. Italian actors can play Cubans, British actors can do Brooklyn accents, Anne Heche can live with a woman off-screen and play a straight heroine, but 20 years after the death of Rock Hudson, the film industry still believes that the audience won't accept a gay actor in a conventional movie-hero part.

But then, commercial films are an incredibly expensive product. When capitalist businessmen drop $200 million to make a story, we can expect that they won't take any unnecessary risks. That brings me to the next question. Where are the gay rock stars? This spring Michael Stipe of R.E.M. finally came out of the closet and called himself "a queer artist." But that crack in the wall was a long time coming.

It's been almost 50 years since Little Richard was playing drag shows and the tough guys at Humes High were beating up Elvis because of his "sissy" looks. Little Richard, for his part, still hedges the question. There are important openly gay figures in dance music, and pop-meister Elton John is out, but the Presleyan cult of the electric guitar was thoroughly closeted until Stipe stepped out.

We've had openly gay judges, members of Congress, and ambassadors. But the popular art form that has (for good and ill) done the most to break down social conventions and old cultural norms has been strangely hesitant on this one. In the 1970s, David Bowie cultivated a fashionably gay persona. But in the '80s he married a woman and claimed he was really straight all along.

Alice Cooper and Marilyn Manson scared two generations of parents to death, but they turned out to be straight in real life. Freddie Mercury (of Queen) wasn't outed until he died of AIDS. Pete Townsend has copped to bisexual activity but only decades after the fact. Once gay rock stars might have feared the wrath of the rock media, but now Rolling Stone founder Jann Wenner is openly living with a man.

I suspect that there are two contradictory forces keeping gay male rock stars in the closet. All of the "great men" of rock history—from Presley to Jagger to Bowie to Prince—have embodied a gender-bending, and even gender-transcending, sexuality. They have assumed a utopian stance that refused to recognize a fundamental distinction between what is male and what is female. That is the biggest part of rock music's subconscious, mythic, and even quasi-religious appeal. (Another is its making race irreelevant.)

But here's the contradiction. It's also true that the CD-buying public for guitar-based rock music is almost as straight, white, and male as the Republican Party. Gay artists have a real reason to fear homophobic rejection, or at least a dimming of enthusiasm, from the headbangers in the pit.

Straight guys might accept "difference" in the public arena, at arms-length, but when it comes to our inner realm of dreams and visions, the things that touch us most deeply—whether it's our music, our movies, or our religion—the fear is still there. And no one is free, or equal, or safe, until it is gone.
--From sojo.net
"Equal" and "safe", yes.  But "free" is something you do yourself.  Elton John is free; that fag toilet senator is not. 

You're free  when you remember who you really are sexually, and accept it instead of hiding it from everyone --- including YOURSELF.


9:33 PM 
6 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Monday, November 23, 2009 
One of my readers  (Toes-R-Us), sent another one (Mary) his old computer so she could get back online.  That was after a third reader (Wolter) bankrolled an expedition of a fourth one (Michael) to rescue her from her abusive boyfriend.  I got Wolter to see that his wife was a parasitic shrew, and he shipped her ass back to Japan.  Now he's much, much happier.  And when Dr. R was living in a motel and needed a place to live, I talked Dave and Kathy into letting him live with us.  A year later, when those two were laid off, Michael rented a new place and let the three of us move in with HIM.

Now my blog helps someone else.  In 26 days, one blog reader (Michael) has paid another one (FRDC) a total of $1,002 for grading essays.  That's about $40/day, $270/week, $1,080/month, and $13,000/year.

FRDC doesn't have any other job, and it's enough to pay his rent.

And unlike transactions in which 'uglicans are involved (where each side squeezes as much as he can out of the other), everyone thinks it's just great for them, as established by the metric: FRDC wants to grade even MORE papers, and Michael is applying for more teaching jobs.

That's the power of helping each other.  That's the power of cooperation. 

The 'uglies will never have these kinds of things happen because for them, everything is a zero-sum game: each side is as mean and greedy as they can get away with. Thus in America, corporations' products are as cheap and sleazy as possible, and sell for the most outrageous money the capitalists can grab from their grumbling customers. 

That's exactly the opposite of the ideal system, in which the incentives are to make things BETTER and sell them for a LOWER cost.

It leads to situations like the Pinto, the first "futuristic" looking car ever made. Ford did a spreadsheet that said they could make $2 more on each car by not lining the gas tanks, at a cost of only a few dozen lives per year.  But when the relatives of those people found out about that, it killed the Pinto and Ford had to swallow some very large turds.

As with Microsoft and Nvidia, the engineers want to do an excellent job, but the marketing people damage the company so badly that it  makes less money than if they behaved in a way they could be proud of (like Google).

It reminds me of the final Harry Potter book.  Harry defeats Voldemort because Voldemort is blind to love, so it never occurred to him that killing Harry's mother (whom Snape loved) would cause Snape to switch sides.

That's the power of cooperation.  That's the power of love.

8:18 PM 
3 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Sunday, November 22, 2009 
What's the best blog site?  I'm sick of myspace.  Not just their policies, but their bugs.

It must provide a word-index feature (or at least a title or keyword index) and allow pictures of tits and cunts . Oh, and ass holes!  It has to allow pictures of ass holes too!!

(Okay, it's a too-subtle parody of Hitler when he ordered the scorched-earth policy for France as the Nazis retreat) Kill ALLL zee farm animals!  Kill zee lambs und zee horses und zee goats... und zee cows. "

"Und ze sheep!" 

[Pause, then he gets all excited]  "Und zee PIGS!!  Kill zee pigs too!"

11:02 PM 
2 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Sunday, November 22, 2009 
My slut is chained by her wrists, standing inside her box. I just finished fucking her with a ceramic balloon mold.   Unfortunately there isn't actually enough room inside her box to
fuck her with my cock.

I made her cum many times until she was whimpering.

I just closed the doors on her, and she is chained up, standing on her toes in the dark.

OH, my GODDD!

My camera just went intermittent on me, but I took some photos on her cell phone. It will take a while to transferred them to my 'puter.

Just tell the phone to email it to your email address.  It's simple. You an send videos that way too.   And if there's a transfer pending, it will continue even if you make a phone call or close the phone.

We want more pix!!!!!

10:51 PM 
4 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Sunday, November 22, 2009 
Apparently she arrived like a parcel.  I guess he found (bought?) her on the internet.  I'd LOVE to auction myself like that (and donate the money to the animal shelter).  I wouldn't tell anyone who it was that bought me, so he can do whatever he wants to me--forever.

When she arrived, she was completely silent, as they had agreed.  She went into the middle of the living room, took off all her clothes, got down on all fours, and moved her hair forward to receive her collar.  She was not even allowed to wear makeup, so that she was completely bare.

COO-well!!

Then he pierced her nipples with rings that he made himself, just for her!



Sometimes he attaches her to the furniture by her nipples so he can torture her.
What a loving thing to do!   And SOOOO sexy!!


He also made her an iron collar, for her neck:





To prove his love, he delicately and tenderly carved his mark into her shoulder:


 
It's "pi" with a slash in it.  My guess is that his RL initials are "NP", like the computational complexity class!

This is just a temporary mark.  She will receive his permanent mark on her cunt.

Oooo, BRAND her! BRAND her!


  Thriller is a good provider, too.  He made a special little room, just for her!    It's between two walls.
Here's the door.  You have to crawl in, then stand up:





Inside, looking up:



The plywood is not the outer roof; it just allowed the pouring of a 4" thick concrete slab. 
He says, "Now, nobody can hear her scream!"

Good thinking, Thriller!



He keeps her standing in there all day and night, manacled to the wall by iron handcuffs he made himself:


I bet she spends all day thinking about nothing but how much she misses him and how she wishes he would come back.

He turns out the light so it's completely dark and absolutely silent in there.  Thriller is SO considerate!

When he takes her out of the little brick closet he stores her in, he keeps her attached by a chain to an eyebolt in the floor. 

She sleeps standing up with her wrists in manacles over her head, a bar holding her legs apart, and dildos in her cunt and ass.

Sometimes he lets her sleep in his bedroom, where he  locks her collar chain to an eyebolt in the wall.

He said:

Tonight I will be fucking her ass again on the exam table, but as a reward for being a very good sex slave this first week, she got to choose which hole I fuck her in first.  She chose to be mouth-fucked.

What a wonderful, WONDERFUL man!  He even let her pick which of her openings he will use first!  

When a man pays THAT much attention to a girl, can you even IMAGINE how much he desires her and her naked body?

GOD, she's lucky!! 

God damn, Thriller  you are RIGHT ON!!!

2:41 AM 
33 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Sunday, November 22, 2009 
GENEVA -- Scientists switched on the world's largest atom smasher Friday night for the first time since the $10 billion machine suffered a spectacular failure more than a year ago.

It took a year of repairs before beams of protons circulated in the Large Hadron Collider for the first time since it was heavily damaged by an electrical fault.

Circulation of the beams was a significant leap forward. The European Organization for Nuclear Research has taken the restart of the collider step by step to avoid further setbacks as it moves toward new scientific experiments -- probably starting in January -- regarding the makeup of matter and the universe.

Progress on restarting the machine, on the border between Switzerland and France, went faster than expected Friday evening and the first beam started circulating in a clockwise direction around the machine about 10 p.m., said James Gillies, spokesman for the European Organization for Nuclear Research.

The scientists have started preparing to circulate another beam in the opposite direction within the coming hours, Gillies said.

"We've still got some way to go before physics can begin, but with this milestone we're well on the way," said CERN Director General Rolf Heuer.

With great fanfare, CERN circulated its first beams Sept. 10, 2008. But the machine was sidetracked nine days later when a badly soldered electrical splice overheated and set off a chain of damage to massive superconducting magnets and other parts of the collider.

Another bad solder joint, huh?

Looks like Thriller gets more right every day!

...And speaking of Thriller, he acquired a new female.  Pix in next blog item!


2:10 AM 
1 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Saturday, November 21, 2009 

12:24 PM 
0 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Saturday, November 21, 2009 
Y'know, I've had so much success at understanding the shape of the universe (because I learn that the things I figure out have already been thought of and are believed by scientists).

So now that I'm gonna tell you something I believe, but which has NOT occurred to anyone else (I think).  If it has, I'll be very, very delighted.

[takes deep breath...]

Okay, the universe started off really small, and it's expanding.  In the  picture below, three dimensions are collapsed into a two-dimensional surface.  The squiggly things are supposed to be photons.  They and the (yellow) galaxies are moving farther apart.

Except that they're not moving.  New space is being created between them.



But why should that be?

Well, think of the "ants on a balloon" analogy.   If the ants walk around on a surface called "the balloon now", then where, physically, were the "balloons of the past?" 

The smaller, past balloons the ants lived on earlier were  concentric spheres inside the "now" balloon, but the ants cannot get to them or even see them.  In fact, the balloon in the past doesn't exist anymore. All they see, and all that exists, is the surface of the "balloon now".

But there is a side-effect of the balloon growing in diameter which they CAN see: space (new balloon surface) appears to be continually created out of nothing, everywhere.

New balloon-surface to walk on seems to appear magically from  nowhere.  And not just at one place; it's happening at every point on the balloon, and they don't know why because they are unable to look in the direction of the center of the balloon.

In the expanding-balloon analogy, no one seems to have noticed that the direction perpendicular to the balloon surface, the direction into which the balloon expands, is time.

The ants ride the edge of the balloon-wave as it expands into time.  And that expansion necessarily implies an expansion of space.

There is no mysterious cosmological constant pushing everything apart.  Our universe HAS to grow larger, to make room for the past--just like the balloon surface for the ants. 

At the center is the big bang.  The light-cone ("null cone") of our past points outward, away from the center and toward the future.

The thing is, it seems to me that if the balloon analogy is correct, and everyone seems to think it is,, then this HAS to be what's happening, just like when the balloon surface moves outward, the ants necessarily see their world as locally flat and growing larger.

Creationists often ask "What does space expand into", and the scientists reply "it expands into nothing"

It expands into time as it turns time into space.
 
Now then:

Mass is known to be nothing but a momentum wave propagating through time (light is a momentum wave frozen in time but propagating through space).  So the mass in the universe is a spherical wave of "matter persisting in time", expanding outwards.

When I figure this kind of stuff out, I don't just guess, hope I'm right, then look for evidence.  I only believe stuff I figure out myself (like the Reimann sphere and time being negative space) when I see that it HAS to be that way, that my new understanding is MANDATED by the equations and other things we know to be true and it couldn't NOT be that way.

I think this is another one of those understandings.

Now, my GUESS (and this is just a guess) is that mass isn't something you drop into space, like ants are dropped onto the balloon.  Rather, mass is a condition of space.  Mass is where expanding spacetime is in some sense "denser". The ants are really just complex, twisted knots of balloon material. 

Where there is no mass, there is no "space".  Our concept of space arises from the fact that, like ants, we have to use time to get from one object to the next.  By moving in space, we slow down in time. Our so-called four-momentum vector points in a slightly diffferent direction.

Also:

The book that Pinecone sent me about relativistic spacetime physics said that Hawking and his friends discovered that during inflation (at the very start of the universe), everything adds up and makes sense mathematically if, during inflation, TIME had positive lengths and all lines extending into SPACE had negative lengths.  They thought it was curious, but didn't know how it fit into the big picture.

It sounds to me like the universe is something being turned inside-out, and that "something" is Time.  Topologically, when time (where lengths are negative)  is turned "inside out" it becomes space (where lengths are positive.  See recent blog items).

I think that "now" is the place where time is being turned inside-out to become space.  As we use up time, we "magically" get more space.

[under construction...]

I know from watching the ghetto called sci.relativity that nobody's going to pay attention to this if it's just words, even if the words explain stuff.  I need to either predict something or derive the value of a fundamental constant from the other ones.  I think I might be able to do that for c.  I KNOW I can explain why c is a particular finite number, even though it "behaves" like infinite speed.

10:31 AM 
4 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Saturday, November 21, 2009 


I've talked about the "null cone" before.  The vertical direction is time, and the other two dimensions, the ones the cones expand into, that's space.

The horizontal plane is "now".  Below the plane is the past and above it, the future.  Different points on the plane are  things happening "now", but in other places.  "Here and now" is the point between the cones.  It's moving upward, through time, at the speed of light. 

In this picture, the "Observer" (or any object with mass) moves along the vertical line, leaving an expanding cone of "him in the past" in his wake.

Objects without mass (like light) stand still in time and so look to us like they're expanding away from a point in space.  Points near you recede into the past by forming an expanding, spherical shell with you at the center. That illusion happens because we're moving through time at the speed of light but insist on seeing ourselves as stationary.

But then again, IS it an illusion, or reality?  Doesn't the principle of relativity say that it's perfectly legitimate to see ourselves as stationary and light as moving?

Yes, it does.

So if you're sitting "motionless" in your chair, what happens when one of these expanding cones from a faraway object in the past touches you? 

You feel it as gravity. 

But it's not the object in the past that's moving. That's the illusion. You're the one moving, through time.

The principle of relativity says that that's a legitimate way of seeing it, too.

9:39 AM 
1 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Saturday, November 21, 2009 
I don't think my previous blog item was all that clear. 
Lemme approach it from a different, uhhh, angle.



If this were in complex space rather than Euclidean space, the red circle would always look like a circle. 

Look at the red circle "projected" onto the floor.  Notice how the red circle's diameter gets larger and larger, expanding into the right side of the picture.  When the circle's (left-right) diameter exceeds infinity, suddenly it's inside-out and on the other (left) side of the picture.

See how the red circle on the sphere crosses itself at the north pole?  That's the diameter going negative and the circle being turned inside-out. Negative diameter and greater-than-infinite diameter are the exact same thing.  In a space that's spherical, positive and negative infinity are the same number.
 
Spacetime is spherical because it's wrapped around a Reimann sphere.  Spacetime, which to us is a flat, infinite plane is in fact spherical.

In principle, If you shoot a laser in any direction and wait long enough, the beam will hit you in the head.  But since the real universe is expanding, that can never happen because light can't keep up with the expanding "edge" of the universe. That is, if it had an edge.

Which it doesn't, because it's a four-dimensional sphere.

It's no more of a paradox than two guys standing back-to-back at the north pole walking in a straight line in opposite directions, and thinking of space as flat, when they meet at the south pole, they are astounded.  "But we walked in opposite directions!"

That's going on in four dimensions, and it's the shape of the universe.  Time is negative space.  The interval metric demands it. Physicists call space "imaginary time" rather than calling time "negative space".  It's the same thing with a fancier name, but the plumage don't enter into it.

The hyperbola isn't two disconnected curves; it's one continuous, unbroken curve that includes a single point in hyperspace.  That point is the "north pole" of the Riemann sphere.

When you rotate that sphere, you make some other point on it the "north pole".  In fact, every point sees itself as being on "the equator" and the north pole being 90º away.  Space is north-south and time is east-west.  In the real universe, it happens in four dimensions.

Rotation of the Riemann sphere (in complex space) corresponds to acceleration in real space.  That's what's going on when you try to reach the speed of light: that speed is always 90º away no matter how far you rotate the sphere.

It's called "relativity" because when two points separate on this sphere, each of them thinks he's still motionless at the equator and that it's the other guy who accelerated. Who's ACTUALLY moving?   There IS no "actually moving".  The principle of relativity states that the answer to the question "What's moving?" is not absolute; it's relative to whichever point you are on the sphere.

----============-----

Can it really be that this isn't automatically obvious to everyone who's ever lived?  How could they NOT see it?  It's as simple as playing with a ball when you were a child.

7:47 AM 
0 Comments
(Add Comment) |
Translate
Faye Kane

Faye Kane


Last Updated: 11/19/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 35
Signup Date: 1/19/2007

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
>