Let me preface this blog by saying that I am not a very politically involved person. I do what I can by voting and encouraging EVERYONE I know to go out and do the same. However, I do have some strong thoughts and feelings about certain things.
This morning I picked up my USA TODAY (article is being paraphrased from p. A3--Joan Biskupic) and I saw a story lead in on the left side of the Cover Story from the front page. It caught my attention because of the sister pictured holding a sign and screaming out her objection to school deintegration in Louisville, Kentucky.
The story is about school districts in Louisville, KY and Seattle, WA that use diversity programs to ship students out of their neighborhoods to "choice" schools to counteract racially segregated housing patterns that are developing in these cities. These are not Magnet schools and (I assume) therefore they do not receive any special justification for bringing in students from outside their jurisdiction. These "diversity programs" are now being called into question regarding whether or not it is unconstitutional.
Justice Anthony Kennedy seems to be the swing man in this case and he is seemingly leaning to the conservatives' side on this one. The question he faces is whether or not "characterizing students by skin color" is in line with the law or above the law. The decision could affect many programs like this across the nation. Both sides think that they are promoting the feelings of Brown from the landmark 1950-something case. Those that support the school districts are mostly inner-city inhabitants and parents. Those that oppose are mostly white parents whose children were not assigned to these "choice" schools.
After reading the article I don't know what to think. I know that I feel that both sides have merit in their arguments. The only problem is that both sides are arguing out of emotional attachments to their desired outcomes. Neither side will ever believe that there is any reason for what the opposing side desires. So the question is simple. Just ask yourself "If I were on the panel, which way would I lean?"
internet version (different story than original newspaper article)
--Notable omissions... Clarence Thomas was noted as an "African American" in the article. I dispute that but his feelings regarding the case were to be expected (conservatives). Brown v. Board was in 1954. "Cissy" Marshall, wife of late Justice Thurgood Marshall was in attendance at Monday hearing.