 |
Current mood:  sad Category: Art and Photography
I have been a professional (full time) photographer for many years and over the past 10 years I have experienced the change from film to digital. I have witnessed an industry destroyed by immediacy and accessibility. Now, I'm witnessing the destruction of it's soul, the creative process.
There are times when I provide models with digital files for their myspace, business cards and portfolios. Recently, several model has decided to "fix" their photographs to their liking in Photoshop and have even sent them back to me to show off how talented they are. One model has even submitted a photograph in an art exhibit with her name on it. Her logic being, since she is in the photograph and she was there when it was made, it was a 50/50 collaboration. Then she altered the background in photoshop which made it 100 percent hers. To shorted this diatribe, I will simply say, this is wrong.
What I learned as an apprentice, a student in art school and with Ansel Adams is that the presentation of a photograph is as much the statement as the image itself. When I deliver a print it is to my artistic liking, as it was also to my artistic liking when I pushed the button. The model has the right to not like the pose, not like the photo or not use the photo. During the photo shoot the model always has the last word and no is no. Once the photograph is taken, I believe they do not have the right to change the photograph to their liking. Especially if my name is on it as photographer. Butting their name on it, well, that's just plain thievery.
It scares me to think that there is a new generation out there that thinks everything is far game. More and more often I find that the concept of respect for original thought is not considered, or even perceived. What makes this all even more unbelievable is that the very people that have no regard for the author, all want to be artists and are dying to show their creativity. It is common for publishers and other money mongers to destroy art to make it commercially viable. You would think that a creative person would understand and protect the rights of the author, if for no other reason, so that they will receive the same respect for their original ideas.
I have never sold my photographs to porno sites out of respect. I do not give out model's names nor do I use stock agencies for the same reason. Until recently, I always thought the feelings were mutual.
8:51 PM
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|