MySpace


Bill DeMichele Photography

Bill Demichele


Last Updated: 10/7/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Divorced
Age: 99
Sign: Pisces

City: Albany
State: New York
Country: US
Signup Date: 3/7/2005

Who Gives Kudos:


Wednesday, March 07, 2007 

Current mood:  sad
Category: Art and Photography
I have been a professional (full time) photographer for many years and over the past 10 years I have experienced the change from film to digital. I have witnessed an industry destroyed by immediacy and accessibility. Now, I'm witnessing the destruction of it's soul, the creative process.

There are times when I provide models with digital files for their myspace, business cards and portfolios. Recently, several model has decided to "fix" their photographs to their liking in Photoshop and have even sent them back to me to show off how talented they are. One model has even submitted a photograph in an art exhibit with her name on it. Her logic being, since she is in the photograph and she was there when it was made, it was a 50/50 collaboration. Then she altered the background in photoshop which made it 100 percent hers. To shorted this diatribe, I will simply say, this is wrong.

What I learned as an apprentice, a student in art school and with Ansel Adams is that the presentation of a photograph is as much the statement as the image itself. When I deliver a print it is to my artistic liking, as it was also to my artistic liking when I pushed the button. The model has the right to not like the pose, not like the photo or not use the photo. During the photo shoot the model always has the last word and no is no. Once the photograph is taken, I believe they do not have the right to change the photograph to their liking. Especially if my name is on it as photographer. Butting their name on it, well, that's just plain thievery.

It scares me to think that there is a new generation out there that thinks everything is far game. More and more often I find that the concept of respect for original thought is not considered, or even perceived. What makes this all even more unbelievable is that the very people that have no regard for the author, all want to be artists and are dying to show their creativity. It is common for publishers and other money mongers to destroy art to make it commercially viable. You would think that a creative person would understand and protect the rights of the author, if for no other reason, so that they will receive the same respect for their original ideas.

I have never sold my photographs to porno sites out of respect. I do not give out model's names nor do I use stock agencies for the same reason. Until recently, I always thought the feelings were mutual.
CEE

 

You are so right...

Wow times HAVE changed indeed....

Love always

Celine


 
Posted by CEE on Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 9:13 PM
[Reply to this
Black Cat Tattoo Care ♥
Killer Tattoo Care Products

 
Some of that would seem like common sense to the average person...
Perhaps an IQ test prior to the shoot would help keep the idiots at bay.
Just a thought.
xoxo
you're awesome.
 
Posted by Black Cat Tattoo Care ♥ on Monday, January 07, 2008 - 9:33 PM
[Reply to this
Dorean Grey - [Photographer]
Dorean Grey

 
I much agree.

To add to it, I am troubled by the alarming number of "models" who feel that just because they call themselves a model, they are one and that gives them the right to charge a photographer, or to demand TFP or TFCD from a photographer. It's not the photographers job to provide the model with a portfolio out of their pocket! TFP and TFCD concepts are for TRADE, if a photographer doesn't need to trade his services AND product for his portfolio, then he has the right to charge, and if the photographer has been hired to do a job requiring him to find a model, then, it's the model's right to expect some form of payment.

But just calling yourself a model does not entitle you to free photo shoots and/or free prints from everyone.
 
Posted by Dorean Grey - [Photographer] on Tuesday, February 12, 2008 - 7:53 AM
[Reply to this
the devil in disguise

 
i dont call myself a model, persay, but i have had pictures taken in the past. if they are ugly, i will fix them, even after the "photographer/wannabe artist" thinks his job is over. if im am recieving the pictures as form of payment [aka TRADE SERVICES] , and to be used in my protfolio, i have the right to do what i please with them, especially if they are going to be used as portfolio. i say this because my portfolio is a collection of my work, like a resume. i need to present myself in a specific way. therefore i, and all models/subjects, have the right to alter as needed. i do not condone reselling art that i have altered, because the original was not created by me. but in the instance that i am speaking, the only thing i am selling is my own image, which again, i have the right to portray as i see fit. i am tired of any douche bag with a camera thinking he is a god.
 
Posted by the devil in disguise on Monday, March 03, 2008 - 7:50 PM
[Reply to this
Geoffrey

 
Bill I'm totally with you on this one.

If what that model said to you was so, why doesn't the model just plunk down the god-knows-how-much-dough your equipment costs you and take their own picture with god-knows-how-little-experience they have in using a camera.

I mean if it's 50-50, the model has the 50 every time they look in the mirror to brush their teeth. An interesting question, how come they didn't use the picture they took then and after that, photo shop the shot? That would be honest of them.

Maybe they'd get the point if when they asked for a picture, you whipped out your cell phone and took a picture and texted it to them.
 
Posted by Geoffrey on Monday, March 03, 2008 - 7:49 PM
[Reply to this
Brian

 
Mr.
William Demichelle,

Based on our recent more colorful conversation I felt the dialogue I wanted to share on the subject matter would only be diluted by the amount of time you graciously shared with me.


When we look at the art of photography and ones expression of life in all its glory should foolish souls tamper? [A resounding no in all directions on the subject, it’s insulting to say the least.] For the ones who steal images I think we also see eye to eye on that one.


Reading further on the comments on just one of your blogs “Cell phone photo response would be far more appropriate.


One step further Bill you have spent 38 years in the industry, art school, keeping up with technologies on all fronts (Note you shoot using two different camera lines “amazing” both guarded like old friends as I noticed the polished look around the 5d trigger), travel, lodging, and most importantly seldom mastered passion about expressing art in photos. I can offer you little advice in return on the erosion of a whole class of art. However, your thoughts should be heard on a much larger spectrum than myspace. I wonder would magazines even publish such talk of preserving the art form when they are struggling to make ends meet. You’re scratching at a much larger surface on many things that are happening to this world. It runs even deeper than paying the rent in other words when sometimes in life that’s all that really matters.


At one point I traveled the world and was paid for my small diatribes and images I presented. The travel industry imploded as you know and what is left? This internet wasteland of corporate driven bottom lines which most people lay shackled to. In the end we all suffered higher prices, long wait times at airports, massive lay offs, crap hotels toted as 5 stars appointed by themselves, useless security fees, fuel surcharges, and a consumer left holding the bag.
Pissed of to say the least usually needing a vacation from the vacation sound familiar?

Yeah, we didn’t even mention all these free contests popping up all of the sudden. It seems like every magazine, news paper; internet site has those catchy contests effectively rendering professionals obsolete in some cases. Sure, I was chewed up by 8 years in travel to be replaced by a box. The icing on the cake was watching the current first lady give a speech on a carnival cruise ship saying everything is going to be okay. Polishing brass on the titanic was hammering repeatedly in my minds eye. That is evolution some people say being discarded. I will pull the reigns a little tighter on my photo works as well because I’m only going to get better. Lastly, I feel being an amateur you share willingly your opinions and people should even if they don’t cross over to professional lend you an ear.


Reviewing the way you celebrate the female form with your own artistic interpretation! Trust me I will forward the link for your book maybe generating some sales at the least.


http://www. proteuspress. com/proteus_files/tiw. html



To me after viewing a myriad of different works around the world in art. It’s the only thing worth saving from our recent 10,000 year stretch of enlightenment. My thoughts are this and what we need to preserve above all things. “The living arts that surround us” The music we dance to, the tears that well up in my eyes when viewing a beautiful Monet, that electric feeling knowing you got the shot of the day captured in light and the Earth in her simple captivating nature that houses human kind. I fear nothing in the destruction of false idols including Wall Street it was all coming. It comes in a far second anyhow for me. I have never lived by greed.


You want my opinion is we need a friggen huge calibration in what we stand for as a species. I bet you never heard of this before a global consciousness formed of common people that stand up and say I’m valuable dammit. They stand up and drop their guns and fight no political wars for archaic ideals. That if they believe in God as I do not bleed in a war to celebrate his great sacrifice or be judged by it. Everyone has the right to their immutable human laws and the people that govern should be held accountable for their manipulation of them. That the youth and me being from another phrase I coined a bridge generation; I see both sides clearly as if the crap was finally wiped form my eyes. I don’t question by what, time or life’s hard road. I said before some people in their foolishly squandered youth are worth saving. If I’m judged by that then once again I don’t give a rats a@@. If I can ask one thing as I see this phase as only a step back. Keep fighting to preserve the art you have chosen photography. It will most assuredly survive beyond your existence. Dedicate at least a fraction of a page to your abundantly strong feelings in words on the erosion. Laws, we are struggling with the burden of too many including intellectual rights.


By the way on a larger scale when the hell did the American people become not worth it…..Greed you say? One of several variations of what I consider a true axis of evil in our time. How do I tell my niece Sam photography is the right direction for her.


PS: I told you writing on that scrap paper I would find you and explain myself further. Usually I don’t get the chance to meet someone able to communicate five different conversations at once.


Regards,
Brian



http://www. proteuspress. com/proteus_files/tiw. html
 
Posted by Brian on Wednesday, October 29, 2008 - 4:02 PM
[Reply to this