MySpace


Photography Community



Last Updated: 5/21/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Female
Status: Single
Age: 98
Sign: Pisces

State: Florida
Country: US
Signup Date: 11/5/2006

Who Gives Kudos:


February 11, 2008 - Monday 

Category: Art and Photography

One of our memebers needs some advice:

"Hello,

I've been using IrFanView for editing orientation and light levels of pics, and Magix for Red Eye and other Photoshop-like work. I tend to save everything at 100%, but I've noticed some file bloat recently.

My 10 MP camera typically has 4-5 MB files for each pic. When I edit them in IrfanView and Magix, some of the pics grow dramatically, sometimes to sizes of 10+MB or thereabout!

I don't want the opposite to happen; namely, having both programs cut out data during saves, and then discover that details on my pics have been "damaged" due to each program having different ideas about what can be thrown out.

What do you all believe is a reasonable level of compression, if you have more than one program altering a file? I don't want to cut out either program, as they both have their strengths, but the bloat is annoying, especially since they don't actually add any detail to the picture."



 
In my opinion it's best to save your original jpeg (from camera) as a .tif for maximum quality...
compressing images will lose you quality even though it may not be instantly visible, as will repeatedly saving jpegs as jpegs. Save a 'master' copy as a .tif and then produce your jpegs from that .tif file at whatever compression you like. I find 65-75% quality fine for web use.

As for file sizes... that's how it is!!!
 
Posted by on February 11, 2008 - Monday - 6:44 PM
[Reply to this