Oh, absolutely a man can be raped. But it sure would be hard to prove... just like it's hard for a man to get much support or sympathy if he says he's abused. People can't imagine that if you have the physical advantage how you could be abused or raped, but people don't understand the emotional and psychological aspect of it.

I remember once when I was fairly young I was on one of my first few dates with a guy I really liked a lot. We were fooling around and I started to get pretty physical with him when he told me that he thought I was moving too fast and wasn't ready to go there (he was religious, too). It would have been pretty easy for me to keep pushing him into doing what I wanted to do, psychologially or physically, but of course I respected his request and backed off. If I had pushed him, tho - that would have been like raping him - even tho he could have easily overpowered me. But no is no, ya know?

Can't listen to the voice clip at work, but will try to check back tonight. Thought of the day - love it!
 

you know if aids was not a big issue i would have been down with that but because aids  is a big problem you think twice about  messing  around without  any protection
 

You're right, man....   I just was young & stupid about stuff like that, back then.  I kinda had that "It'll NEVER happen to me" attitude.  I got away with alotta bareback activity.
 

EXACTLY!!!!!  You must've been sitting in @ that seminar [or teaching it].

She was LUCKY that she tried that shit with me, b-cuz I WASN'T the kinda guy that was gonna run to the police about it.

But, whatcha said about "People can't imagine that if you have the physical advantage how you could be abused or raped, but people don't understand the emotional and psychological aspect of it" is very true [along with your assertion that "no is no"].

I had to wrestle with the psychological aspect of it THAT EVENING, b-cuz you've only gotta split second decision & you're just thinking, "How can I get this crazy woman to let go of my penis"!!!!

Shoot, I once had an ex-girlfriend of mine get mad @ me b-cuz I'd decided to breakup with her.  We'd JUST finished having sex & afterwards, she said sumthin' to me that made me say, "Ya know what????  I DON'T wanna deal with this bullshit anymore".  So, I told her that it was over & started to walk out!!!!

But, she was DICK-WHIPPED & decided to call the cops b-cuz "nobody leaves her"!!!!  She called the cops, told them that an intruder was in her house, screamed, & then hung up the phone WITHOUT giving her address [she REALLY played that dramatic role].

The cops showed up, before I could get my clothes on & get outta there [which is a surprise given that I was somewhere in D.C.]  And guess what she told the cops when they showed up????  "ARREST HIM, HE's A STALKER"!!!! 

I said, "What the fuck????  She's lying!!!!  We were fuckin' about 1/2 hour before she called you guys".  The cops were about to put me in handcuffs, when I grabbed the condom outta the trash can & said, "This is the rubber we were using & all.  You can test this shit"!!!!  That's when the cops turned around & left [but, if I hadn't done it, then they would've just taken her word].

So, like I said....   some women do some FUCKED UP things, when they're rejected!!!!  And when they tell the cops sumthin', Johnnie Law's programmed to put the guy in handcuffs & ask questions later [even if the prosecuting attorney gives the female accuser HELL].
 

having a hard on is not in anyway proof of anything.....

when little boys are molested....i'm not going into detail here....but being aroused is very often a physiological response to stimulation....nothing more.

 

True, somehow I was able to maintain my hard-on despite the excrutiating pain of having it grabbed.

But, @ THAT very moment, you couldn't have paid me enough to say that I was aroused by her grip....   furthermore, I've NEVER been the kinda guy that was into S&M, degredation, & mutilation.
 

most little boys aren't either, which is why the experience is so traumatizing.  someone they love and trust is doing things they know make them uncomfortable, yet they are aroused, makes it all the more psychologically damaging...

good on you for writing about your experience

 

I don't even like thinking about stuff like that [where little kids are being abused & hurt]. But, it was definitely necessary for you to be bring it up in this discussion [b-cuz it reinforces a valid point].

And I don't mind sharing many of my personal experiences with people [even if some of them aren't of the happy-go-lucky type]. I tend to poke fun @ things, in most of my blogs. But, about once per week, I'll blog about something MORE serious than the usual comedy.
 

as a side, it's easier for a WOMAN to pass hiv onto a man, just like with any other std. i took an std's class last semester, and since the area is so much larger on a woman, it's easier to pass anything from women to men than men to women...

honestly, and i DON'T want you to get mad at me, i don't think that you were raped, by the way you told your story. you didn't have to put your dick in her, you coulda just called it a night. it's not like she held a gun to your head, you were the one who basically said fuck it, and just fucked her. even if she had your johnson in her hand, you are a man, and i'm sure coulda overpowered that bitch and gotten the fuck outta there.

but i think it is possible for a man to be raped, no doubt. but usually, i would think that it would have to involve some type of weapon, cuz most men can overpower any bitch. i know you don't agree with me probably, but that's my two cents...

 

"You didn't have to put your dick in her, you coulda just called it a night. it's not like she held a gun to your head, you were the one who basically said fuck it, and just fucked her. even if she had your johnson in her hand, you are a man, and i'm sure coulda overpowered that bitch and gotten the fuck outta there".

True, I DIDN'T have to put it in....   but, imagine if somebody took their hand, grabbed one of your breasts, squeezed with all of their might, & turned their hand [almost mashing it into your chest].

That shit's kinda like what happened to me with this girl----it wasn't any ordinary grab, like you're picking up the phone or sumthin'.

Sure, I could've TRIED to overpower her....   but, WOMEN BRUISE ahelluvalot easier than men do.

I think what you're failing to realize is how UNSTABLE a woman's gottabe, just to grab a man's dick, squeeze to the point that it hurts, & tell him to put it in.

Let's say that I DID try to overpower her....   what should I have done????  Smacked her in the mouth & risked leaving a hand print?  Grab one of her arms & take the risk that I leave a mark?    Pushed her down & taken the risk that she hit something in the room [like a table, desk, & chair] that left her with some kinda visible injury?

It's EASY to say, "Oh, you could've overpowered her" [which I could've]....   but, THAT's THE POINT that I'm making about the potential aftermath of my doing so.  Again, you're dealing with a woman that's obviously UNSTABLE [& those kinda women are the ones that'll file FAKE charges, when they're turned away by a man----just to spite him].
 
And let's say that I SOMEHOW was able to get outta the situation WITHOUT her getting bruised @ all & she was angry enough about BEING REJECTED to run to the police alleging that I'd tried to rape her.  Sure, she woulda had to prove it----but, it's NOT like my name would've been CLEAN from that day forward [my record would reflect that I'd been charged, even if I was NEVER convicted & my name would've been all over the press and school newspaper]. 

You CAN'T really look @ it from the WE WOMEN ARE SO MUCH WEAKER THAN MEN standpoint [b-cuz, if that's the case, then the court system would IGNORE IT whenever a woman admitted to putting her hands on a man 1st, leading to him physically retaliating].

Judges DON'T look @ those cases & say, "Oh well, sir, even though she hit you 1st....   you DIDN'T have to put your hands on her, after all, she CAN'T overpower you".  NO, the judges actually call that self-defense [even if the cops arrest the man, b-cuz the woman called 1st].

My point is that EVEN THOUGH I COULD'VE OVERPOWERED HER....   you can't just assume that doing so WOULD'VE resulted in an ideal outcome.

No, she didn't have a gun to my head....   but, in this case, I had to decide between the POTENTIAL OF BEING CHARGED WITH BATTERY & ATTEMPTED RAPE [by a scorned women who'd been turned away] or contracting an STD.  And if you think that I had another choice, then feel free to share it.

Rape DOESN'T mean that someone put a gun to your head....   it simply means that you decided to take something by force, despite being told the word "NO". 

Let's say that the rapist was a man standing 5'5" & weighing 140 pounds....   he decides to rape a big woman that's 5'8" & 230 pounds EXCEPT he DOESN'T use a weapon.  The only thing that he does is grab her hand & tell her to give him some head, even though she's told him, "NO, I'm NOT doing it unless you wear a condom" [b-cuz SOME women actually give blowjobs with rubbers].  He squeezes her arm to the point that it hurts, but SOMEHOW doesn't leave a bruise & [even though she's bigger than him] she decides to give him head anyway.

Is that a rape????  Or is it NOT a rape b-cuz she was BIGGER than the man was & could've defended herself b-cuz he DIDN'T have a weapon????

Shoot, I'd hate to see the day when a jury said to a woman, "No, it's NOT a rape when the man who does the crime is SMALLER than you & NOT brandishing a weapon.  So, sorry ladies, you've gotta date men that're BIGGER than you are if ya wanna get a conviction".
 

Yes I think it was rape you really didn't have options like you said she took those away the thought of being in your shoes like that scares me and our normal reaction is to say that men can overpower a woman but its more fear than anything and like you said really who do we tend to believe whether its the truth or not we beleive the woman complaining. Society has trained us to think of things this way that men can't be raped and I can bet if you asked all men they would say what society does that it can't happen. I am sorry this happened to you that was not right and you didn't deserve that...you should however get tested on a regular basis not just because you were raped but because thats our lives now testing should be a norm.....good luck

destiny

 

"Yes I think it was rape you really didn't have options like you said she took those away"

Exactly....  when somebody grabs & pulls on your johnson, then your 1st thought is to HIT THEM!!!!  You AREN'T really thinking rationally.  But, somehow, I controlled my anger & that's when my mind started trying to figure outta way outta it.  The more that I resisted & tried to talk her outta it, the HARDER she grabbed.

Sure, I could've tried to rollover & fall off the bed....   but, that's risking SERIOUS permanent damage to your genitals [& I wasn't willing to do that].  So, I did what I felt that I had to do.  That DIDN'T solve the problem any more than ANY other option would've.

If I'd suddenly changed my mind [in the middle of the act] & told her that she'd ruined the mood by doing what she did....  then, she would've had enough evidence to run into a police crying rape OUTTA SPITE [b-cuz I'd already penetrated her]. 

All of those thoughts were running through my mind....   "Please don't let her have any diseases", "She's got sumthin' wrong with her & I hope that she's NOT crazy enough to cry rape, when we're finished [because I'm certainly NOT gonna call her after tonight]", "Don't give her any indication that you're NOT enjoying it anymore", "If I get an STD from this, then is there anything that I could've done differently", & "If I get her pregnant, then I'm gonna have to deal with this PSYCHO for the rest of my life".

"Society has trained us to think of things this way that men can't be raped and I can bet if you asked all men they would say what society does that it can't happen".

Very true....   but, there are SOME men that're keen enough to know it can happen [just very few].

that was not right and you didn't deserve that

I don't think that I did either....   I've NEVER taken anything from a woman.  Sure, I've manipulated situations & done some verbal persuasion, in my day.  But, I've NEVER taken anything by force & would NEVER continue after hearing the word "NO" or "STOP".

"you should however get tested on a regular basis not just because you were raped but because thats our lives now testing should be a norm"

Since the incident, I've been tested TOO MANY TIMES TO COUNT.  However, I know that I might take some heat, for what I'm about to say next.

@ this point in my life, I'm NOT really worried about testing anymore based on the nature of MY OWN situation.

I truly understand the kinda sexual enviroment that we live in nowadays....   but, I've been in a monogamous relationship for almost 4 1/2 years now & when I met my lady, she was a VIRGIN.

I trust her & we share the EXACT SAME VALUES when it comes to monogamy, cheating, sex, love, having children, etc.  Nowadays, most people can't really fathom the idea of trusting someone 100% [naturally, b-cuz there are so many people out here that're having casual sex & lying 24/7]. 

But, I COMPLETELY TRUST the woman that I'm with, plan to spend the rest of my life with her, & refuse to live my life worrying about whether she's gonna go out experimenting sexually with other men behind my back.  We BOTH understand that our kinda relationship goes AGAINST the rules that MOST people in society live by nowadays.

Now, if we ever brokeup, then I WOULDN'T take this attitude with OTHER women.  I'd surely get tested on the regular & would stop having unprotected sex altogether.
 

Ok first off had to check the link LOL and yup played it in physic class(LOL first 20 mins of class was damn fun) my professor had everyone stand up to check who had baggie jeans on(he is a cool professor from the sixty's) Damn fun class and he told us if we plan to spend 20 mins a day messing around which he rather enjoyed then we have to make sure we get all our shit(yup he said shit) handed in right away so we had time to cover the blog of the day(lol)

 

Now on to the blog part. You are very lucky cause you would not believe what med students are around everyday and they have to go in every six months here to make sure that they have not caught something from all the crap they get into(maybe that is just in SD) There get a CMP and other blood work like clock work.

When you think about it, it is pretty messed up on how she could pretty much do that and either you suffer or do what she wanted cause you are right had you hit her and she went to police you would have been the one on trial..

You have to admit if you went in and said to the police hey she tried to rape me they would have laughed you right out the door. But do you think had it been say some girl with a face only a mother could love that you would have even been able to keep it going lol.

 

"When you think about it, it is pretty messed up on how she could pretty much do that and either you suffer or do what she wanted cause you are right had you hit her and she went to police you would have been the one on trial"

EXACTLY!!!!  And that was the risk that I WASN'T willing to take [& to this day, I still couldn't tell you whether I made the right or wrong choice....    I can only say that I gambled & got away with it].

"You have to admit if you went in and said to the police hey she tried to rape me they would have laughed you right out the door".

Yep, that's exactly what would've happened [if I was LUCKY to get outta the incident without having charges filed AGAINST me].

I was just telling Chris that I think the problem is that people take the association of RAPE with POWER a bit too far.  But, there's a difference between "rape being about the perpetrator's obsession with power" & thinking that "a rape CAN'T happen unless you're being overpowered".

I think we've ALL been conditioned to equate RAPE with DEFENSELESS....   but, imagine if men walked around saying, "Hey all of you VIRGINS out there!!!!  If he DOESN'T have a weapon, then you should fight until he gives up----because walking away with a broken nose is ahelluvalot better than having a broken hymen.  You CAN ALWAYS do something, to prevent having your virginity TAKEN FROM YOU if he DOESN'T have a weapon".

Imagine, again, if you were in court & there was a woman who REALLY got raped by somebody who ONLY said that he had a gun just so she WOULDN'T fight him, while he took whatever he wanted [even though he WASN'T carrying one @ all].  Let's say that she was so shook by him merely SAYING that he had a gun, that she decided to give it up to him WITHOUT RESISTING [even though she could've fought until he PROVED that he had one, by pulling it out].

Now, imagine being in court & hearing this accused rapist say, "She's LYING!!!!  I DIDN'T have a weapon, the night that we were together.  Sure, I told her that I sometimes carry a gun for protection.  But, she's the dummy who assumed that I had it on me that night.   If I REALLY raped her, then why DIDN'T she fight me????  It's b-cuz she's LYING through her teeth.  Man, when the doctor examined her, they DIDN'T find any evidence that I forced myself upon her.  She had sex with me WILLINGLY"!!!!

How many people in here would listen to that story & say, "NOT GUILTY"!!!!

She WASN'T exactly POWERLESS, right????  She also COULD'VE done more, than let him have it.  Betcha that NOBODY in here would be crazy enough to say that she WASN'T raped, in this case [& we're NOT even dealing with a situation where the perpetrator used physical force to get to the point where he was able to commit the crime].

Is it still rape??  Would anybody have the balls to say, "She DIDN'T get raped.  @ the very least, she's just a STUPID GIRL that fell for a con man's ploy"?!

I'm sure that SOME people would be like, "He's still STRONGER than she is"....   but, what if the girl was 2x as big as the guy she was accusing & he couldn't even bench press 1/2 his damn weight??

Would anybody comeback & say that it WASN'T a rape, b-cuz he'd need steroids just to overpower her in the LEAST bit????  See, this is why it's DANGEROUS to associate rape with being overpowered.  You shouldn't have a society that tells LARGE women that they're NOT @ an advantage, simply b-cuz the rapist weighs 150+ pounds less.
 

"I do agree that you may not have been raped. I think you could've done something. You were at your place. You shouldn't let someone disrespect you in your own house!! I think there were other things you could've tried".

Like I said to somebody else in here....   that's NOT an argument that'd hold up, in court.

Even if I got 12 jurors who ALL felt the same way as you....   the Supreme Court would NEVER uphold the ruling nowadays, b-cuz it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL to make a LAW that's based on inequality [whether it's racial bias or gender inequity].

And if THAT happened [which it WOULD]....   then, the woman would be looking @ a MAJOR civil lawsuit [just b-cuz all of the lower courts had set an UNCONSTITUTIONAL precedent].

Let's say that a woman's gotta gun, in her purse & she's raped by a WEAPONLESS offender.  Sure, she could've pulled it out & shot him....   but, what if she thought, "Cops are known to fuck cases up & they might say that I killed him in cold blood and tried to MAKE IT LOOK like a rape happened" [& then, she decided to let him have his way with her].

If she were to run to the police RIGHT AFTER & accuse him of rape....   you've gottabe a cop WITH ALOTTA NERVE to have semen samples, her statement that he DIDN'T have a weapon, & then say, "Ma'am, we just searched through your purse & found a gun.  I'm sorry, but you could've done something to prevent this from happening.  You were in your home & could've shot him in self-defense.  I'm sorry, but you had EVERY opportunity in The World to defend yourself.  So, no, you're just gonna have to suck it up".

Again, you've gotta remember that THE LAW doesn't say, "It's only a rape when you COULDN'T have stopped it" or "It's NOT rape when it happens in your house, b-cuz you shouldn't let anyone disrespect you in your home".

People may NOT like it or agree....   but, that's the way that it is.  Rape is rape & it DOESN'T matter whether one act is grisly as compared to another act being angelic.
 

it's easy for everyone else to say "you should have tried something different" but when it comes down to it...it was still unwanted sexual contact.

i think it is a lot harder to prove that a man has been raped...especially because of the fact that men can get stimulated and have an erection which is obvious...but that doesn't mean that a man wants to have sex with some random crazy broad just cause he's hard.

 

Ya know what's weird....   I DIDN'T even think about the word "RAPE" when the incident happened.

It was my friend (Kathy) who kinda opened my eyes about what had taken place.  I sorta looked @ her when she said it & was like, "C'mon now, that ISN'T rape & I wouldn't press charges, even if it was".

But, like ya said....   it was UNWANTED sexual contact, nonetheless & that falls under "RAPE".

People like to say that you CAN'T rape your wife....   but, there ISN'T a court in the land that's gonna say, "It's AUTOMATICALLY legitimate sexual contact when you're married to someone----even if your wife's angry & tells you that she's NOT in the mood".  Shoot, you'd BETTER NOT be the fool who decides to take it by force that night & then, comeback talking about how she's not allowed to turn you down b-cuz you're married!!!!

And if you're on a date with the biggest whore in The World, she tells you that she wants to fuck your brains out, you get her clothes off, & she says "NO" @ the last minute....   you'd better NOT slip that dick in there, even if she's got her legs spread WIDE OPEN!!!!  You'd still be raping her, even if you DIDN'T touch anything other than her crotch area. 
 

I once was seeig this girl who tried simalar shit with me but I was able to get out of the situation. It wasnt until she got drunk that I noticed any thing wierd about her. Sober she was sweet as can be. When she got vodka in her she turned into a psyco bitch. She demanded that i have sex with her when we had agred we would wait. When i told her no she started throwing the empty bottles at me cursing and screaming like she was possed( Spelling) I tried to leave and she grabbed me and wouldnt let go. Luckly for me she was about 20 pounds lighter then me and far weaker. I managed to break her grip but, then she just started beating the crap outta me. The only thing I could think of at the time was to pick her up and toss her on the couch and bolt for the door. I think I set a new worlds record that day for the mile :P. Its not very comman for man to report rape. So its has become a sterotype that guys cant be raped.

Theres several cities in my state that make it a crime to wear  baggy jeans below a certain area. I tried wearing that style of clothing all i could think was how the hell do they wear this shit.

 

That's EXACTLY what one of the ladies doing the seminar said: "Its not very common for men to report rape.  So, its has become a STEREOTYPE that guys CAN'T be raped".

And the funny thing is that the position that alotta people are making in here about "MEN BEING ABLE TO OVERPOWER" was actually the MAIN point that the people giving the seminar addressed about why that's NOT legal justification @ all to say that a rape DIDN'T happen.

Now, personally [like I've said], I DIDN'T even consider it a rape & @ 1st, I felt the same way about it NOT being possible for a man to rape a woman when he can overpower her.  I even went so far as to raise that issue, when asking my question.

But, the people giving the seminar were like, "Noooo, the LAW still defines that as rape"!!!!

Again, I'm NOT saying that I woulda pressed charges @ all....   but, I think that people are overlooking that MAJOR point [about what the law says & how it DOESN'T make a distinction based on gender or the physical power of a man]!!!!

Also, I keep hearing people say "YOU COULDA DONE SOMETHING"....   but, I've yet to see anybody offer a solution @ all [& I'm talking about one that WOULDN'T be based on the USE OF PHYSICAL FORCE].

B-cuz if I'd used physical force, again, she could've run to the police & said, "That nigga hit me"!!!!

And if I'd said, "Yo, I had to hit her, b-cuz she grabbed my dick & was trying to make me fuck her without a condom"....   
she woulda been saying, "I grabbed his dick, b-cuz he TRIED TO RAPE ME" & then my ass woulda been arrested.  She woulda just gone through with the entire charade, b-cuz she would've been vindictive & trying to teach me a lesson!!!!  And how many jurors woulda believed ME [on word-of-mouth] over HER [after I'd admitted to putting my hands on her].  Man they woulda rendered a guilty verdict on the charge of ATTEMPTED RAPE alone & then, I woulda gotten my ass raped in prison FOR REAL.

It's easy to say sumthin' could've been done, when you AREN'T coming up with any solutions to having your dick grabbed [maybe ladies dunno how that shit REALLY feels....   it's sumthin' that'd make you wanna hit somebody, that's for sure----I dunno how the fuck I controlled my anger]!!!!
 

I do agree that this was wrong, but I don't really think it was rape. I'm not saying that it would have been smart of you to bust her ass, even though it's sounds like she had it coming.   But you being a man, we are to assume that unless there is more than one female, or a weapon, you could have maybe slammed her down, and walked away.  I am not saying at all that a man can't be raped, I just don't think that's what this was. Maybe just a overzealous girl that wanted you real bad, just stupid at how she showed it!

 

1st, here's sumthin' for EVERYBODY....   CLICK THE LINK
Please note that NEVER ONCE was there ANY mention of a weapon needing to be used, to commit the crime.

Now, in regards to the audio clips:

@ Cher,
Please be sure that you tell your professor that I said, "It's truly an honor to be a part of his learning experience.  I kinda feel like I'm being irresponsible, by saying certain things in my blog now.  But, the fact that he's obviously a man of superior intellect [given that he's a scientist placed with the responsibility of educating the future leaders of America] & appreciates my blog enough to laugh with his class about it, is one of the greatest honors ever bestowed upon me.  So, I sincerely THANK YOU"!

@ Chris,
Geez, they made it a crime????  What would they charge somebody with, INDECENT EXPOSURE??  I'm NOT gonna act like I DON'T wear baggy jeans too, or that I haven't had days where I forgot to wear a belt & my pants were sagging.  But, I DON'T go around like these fools do PURPOSELY wearing em' so that they're down around their ankles.  Still, I've gotta wonder about anyplace that'd make it unlawful to wear baggy jeans----it's NOT like they're gonna curb crime, by doing this.

@ Prissy Jazzy,
I'd like to see a study that'd show what % of your TOP SPEED is decreased by wearing baggy jeans that're sagging past your ass.

 

I guess its just to easy for them to hide stuff in baggy apparell. Plus I believe they were trying ti cut the image of the city being run by thugs.

Here's a couple links related to baggy clothes.

http://www.slsheriff.org/html/org/metrogang/clothes.html

http://www.lawlibrary.state.mt.us/dscgi/ds.py/GetRepr/File-29598/html

In May 2004 in Louisiana, Congressman Dick Shepard proposed a bill that would make it a crime to appear in public wearing trousers below the waist and thereby exposing one's skin or "intimate clothing". ([1], PDF). The Louisiana bill was retracted after negative public reaction.

In February 2005, Virginia legislators tried to pass a similar law that would have made punishable by a $50 fine: "any person who, while in a public place, intentionally wears and displays his below-waist undergarments, intended to cover a person's intimate parts, in a lewd or indecent manner".

In May 2004 in Louisiana, Congressman Dick Shepard proposed a bill that would make it a crime to appear in public wearing trousers below the waist and thereby exposing one's skin or "intimate clothing". ([1], PDF). The Louisiana bill was retracted after negative public reaction.

In February 2005, Virginia legislators tried to pass a similar law that would have made punishable by a $50 fine: "any person who, while in a public place, intentionally wears and displays his below-waist undergarments, intended to cover a person's intimate parts, in a lewd or indecent manner".

 

 

Yeah, it was some shit.  But, hey, what can I say?  I'm just glad that she didn't gimmie an STD.

As for the audio blog....   I aactually DON'T like the way my voice sounds, when it's recorded [b-cuz it actually DOESN'T come out as deep as it really is].  I'm glad that you like it, b-cuz I was thinking that my voice was gonna come off as GEEKY.

But, I'm gonna keep doing audio blogs [not every day, but maybe 1-2x per week].  It's not nearly as easy as I originally thought it'd be....   it takes alotta time & sometimes whatcha say doesn't come out well.

If you read from a script, then it's gonnabe frustrating when you mess up & the flow's gonna sound kinda off....    on the other hand, if you do it spontaneously, then you run the risk of rambling, boring people, or having dead space. 

I'm still gonna try it @ least a few times more, b-cuz it adds an interesting dimension to my blog & allows me to talk about OTHER things [since I mainly blog about love, sex, dating, & romance topcics].  It's a new challenge & I'm sure that I'll get used to iy after few tries.
 

It happenes everyday, but they file it under a different name than rape. Its called Child support.
 

Your definition of child support must be "Rape of the pocket".
 

Awesome blog!  I, too, have had this argument and have had people laught at me.  I'm glad that your class wasn't some of those people.  Of course, I never had a "bitch squeezed my johnson case" either.
 

Thanks man....  & trust me, you DON'T EVER wanna have your johnson squeezed!!!!  That was the worst kinda pain that I've had other than my appendectomy.  I've broken bones & sprained ligaments before, but that was NOTHING compared to the pain of having it squeezed.