 |
Current mood:  contemplative Category: Religion and Philosophy
Jehovah's Witnesses
They frequently claim to be able to support their doctrine by using only the Scriptures, however I have found that is not the case. Several of their key doctrines that have no support whatsoever in the Scriptures. My blogs will present a series of such doctrines. All Scriptures will be sourced from the New World Translation unless otherwise noted.
If you disagree, feel free to comment to your heart's content. Also, feel free to discuss this by email.
Judicial Committees According to Jehovah's Witnesses, elders in the congregation serve as judges “to keep the congregation clean.” The purpose is ostensibly two-fold. They want to make sure the organization does not get corrupted and they want to protect the privacy of the accused wrongdoer.
However, the actual function, in practice, is to hide wrongdoing from the congregation and to escape the possibility of accountability to Caesar's law for how they handle the case.
There is no Scriptural basis for the following aspects of Judicial Committees:
- Elders acting in place of or on behalf of the individual members congregation in determining who is guilty and what the punishment should be.
- Conducting secret hearings, without allowing witnesses to the proceedings or allowing the proceedings to be recorded.
- Making a statement of the outcome (sentencing) and expecting congregants to abide by the elder's decision whether they know the facts of the matter or not.
- Ruling in favor of shunning ANYONE who voluntarily leaves, i.e. those who no longer call themselves a brother.
What do the Scriptures say about how to handle wrongdoing?
1. Elders acting in place of or on behalf of the individual congregants in determining who is guilty and what the punishment should be.
Matthew 18:15-17 — “Moreover, if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. 16 But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. 17 If he does not listen to them, speak to the congregation. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations and as a tax collector.”
Comment —A primary text used in support of the “Judicial arrangement,” as it is called. Specifically, Jehovah's Witnesses teach that this type of sin would be a personal fault or offense, e.g. fraud. Still, they teach that the last step refers to bringing the matter to the attention of the elders in the congregation. This could only be true if "elders" equals "congregation."
2. Conducting secret hearings, without allowing witnesses to the proceedings or allowing the proceedings to be recorded.
1 Timothy 5:20 — “Reprove before all onlookers persons who practice sin, that the rest also may have fear.”
Comment —Does "reprove" mean to announce a decision reached in private? The Greek word elegche (from gr. elegcho) means to convict publicly, to bring to light, to find and reveal fault with. But don't take my word for it. Here is a list of other verses that use the same word: Matthew 18:15; Luke 3:19; John 3:20; 8:46; 16:8; 1 Corinthians 14:24; Ephesians 5:11, 13; 1 Timothy 5:20; 2 Timothy 4:2; Titus 1:9, 13; 2:15; Hebrews 12:5; James 2:9; Reveleation 3:19
"Before all" (gr. enopion panton) is translated simply "in sight of all" by the Kingdom Interlinear. Would this bring to mind a closed door trial before a tiny percentage of the congregation who act as Judge, jury, and executioner?
3. Making a statement of the outcome (sentencing) and expecting congregants to abide by the elder's decision whether they know the facts of the matter or not.
James 1:19 — “Know this, my beloved brothers. Every man must be swift about hearing, slow about speaking, slow about wrath;”
1 John 3:18 — “Little children, let us love, neither in word nor with the tongue, but in deed and truth.”
1 John 4:1 — “Beloved ones, do not believe every inspired expression, but test the inspired expressions to see whether they originate with God, because many false prophets have gone forth into the world.”
1 John 4:18 — “There is no fear in love, but perfect love throws fear outside, because fear exercises a restraint. Indeed, he that is under fear has not been made perfect in love.”
Comment —How can we claim to love, as Jesus loved, if we allow the judgment of admittedly imperfect men to serve as our conscience and as basis for cutting off one we called our brother? I do not believe there is a need to belabor this specific point. Anyone who has a conscience should be able to discern the merit.
4. Ruling in favor of shunning ANYONE who voluntarily leaves, i.e. those who no longer call themselves a brother.
1 Corinthians 5:9-13 — “In my letter I wrote YOU to quit mixing in company with fornicators, 10 not [meaning] entirely with the fornicators of this world or the greedy persons and extortioners or idolaters. Otherwise, YOU would actually have to get out of the world. 11 But now I am writing YOU to quit mixing in company with anyone called a brother that is a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner, not even eating with such a man. 12 For what do I have to do with judging those outside? Do YOU not judge those inside, 13 while God judges those outside? ‘Remove the wicked [man] from among yourselves.’”
Matthew 18:15-17 — “Moreover, if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. 16 But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. 17 If he does not listen to them, speak to the congregation. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations and as a tax collector.”
Comment —If someone was calling themselves a brother, but they are not currently calling themselves a brother...are they to be viewed as worse than a “man of the nations [or] tax collector?” Would such a person not have returned to the world? Is Paul suggesting that we be mindful of our associations with those “called a brother” who could harm our spirituality, or is he suggesting that we cut off association with anyone who practices sin? Feel free to email me. I look forward to considering your thoughts on the matter.
6:22 PM
Powered by  | | English | | Albanian | | Arabic | | Bulgarian | | Catalan | | Chinese | | Croatian | | Czech | | Danish | | Dutch | | Estonian | | Filipino | | Finnish | | French | | Galician | | German | | Greek | | Hebrew | | Hindi | | Hungarian | | Indonesian | | Italian | | Japanese | | Korean | | Latvian | | Lithuanian | | Maltese | | Norwegian | | Polish | | Portuguese | | Romanian | | Russian | | Serbian | | Slovak | | Slovenian | | Spanish | | Swedish | | Thai | | Turkish | | Ukrainian | | Vietnamese |
|