MySpace

Photobucket
Ignorance Isn't Bliss

Dann Arky


Last Updated: 11/5/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Single
Age: 30
Country: US

Who Gives Kudos:



My Subscriptions
Monday, February 06, 2006 

Category: News and Politics

Bush's State of the Union calls for nanotechnology, supercomputing spending

Bush's State of the Union calls for research spending

January 31, 2006 9:57 PM PST

President Bush spent a lot of time in his State of the Union address Tuesday evening talking about technology, but it was mostly about calling for better alternatives to oil. (Defending the war in Iraq was another.)

"Tonight, I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative -- a 22-percent increase in clean-energy research -- at the Department of Energy, to push for breakthroughs" in automobile fuel and electrical generation, Bush said, citing an unhealthy "addiction" to oil.

Even though it may be a politically savvy move to call for weaning America from foreign oil, it's hardly clear that the humble black liquid is in danger of disappearing. Peter Huber and Mark Mills last year wrote a provocative article that essentially argues: if prices go up and are viewed as staying up, there's plenty of oil in Canada and Venezuela alone for the next century.

In addition to the oil angle, Bush also reiterated something he called for in the 2005 State of the Union address: digitized medical records. "We will make wider use of electronic records and other health information technology, to help control costs and reduce dangerous medical errors," he said.

Finally, Bush cited three themes -- R&D funding, R&D tax credit, and education -- that are beloved by tech companies. Here's an excerpt:

First, I propose to double the federal commitment to the most critical basic research programs in the physical sciences over the next 10 years. This funding will support the work of America's most creative minds as they explore promising areas such as nanotechnology, supercomputing, and alternative energy sources.

Second, I propose to make permanent the research and development tax credit to encourage bolder private-sector initiatives in technology. With more research in both the public and private sectors, we will improve our quality of life -- and ensure that America will lead the world in opportunity and innovation for decades to come.

Third, we need to encourage children to take more math and science, and to make sure those courses are rigorous enough to compete with other nations. We've made a good start in the early grades with the No Child Left Behind Act, which is raising standards and lifting test scores across our country. Tonight I propose to train 70,000 high school teachers to lead advanced-placement courses in math and science, bring 30,000 math and science professionals to teach in classrooms, and give early help to students who struggle with math, so they have a better chance at good, high-wage jobs. If we ensure that America's children succeed in life, they will ensure that America succeeds in the world.

Hey Curious George, why don't you tell them what nanotechnology really means ?

Malachi
Malachi de Ælfweald

 
Here's what I don't get... How can coal (fossil fuel), nuclear, or wood chips (for his ethanol comment) be counted as new technology?  What happened to hydrogen being the next big thing?
 
Posted by Malachi on Monday, February 06, 2006 - 7:11 PM
[Reply to this
Kristy

 
No kidding Malachi - like when he said we can start making use of "switch grass." In order to fuel every car in this nation with ethanol that was produced from switch grass, we'd need to farm an area the size of Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico combined! I don't see how that's solving anyone's problems, we don't have that kind of land! Hydrogen is the way to go, and funny, hydrogen was completely omitted from the speech.
 
Posted by Kristy on Monday, February 06, 2006 - 7:23 PM
[Reply to this
Ignorance Isn't Bliss
Dann Arky

 
They could do it with hemp, but they wont.
 
Posted by Ignorance Isn't Bliss on Monday, February 06, 2006 - 7:39 PM
[Reply to this
Tort Reform for dummies

 
As I somewhat stated in a bulletin, we are all impervious to truth. we act as sheep, and don't care, because dammit, rather than study the reality of our world, there's a great cat fight on Springer.
 
Posted by Tort Reform for dummies on Monday, February 06, 2006 - 7:43 PM
[Reply to this
Kyra's Matrix - E.D.F.

 
Well said! Very well said! Thanks! 
 
Posted by Kyra's Matrix - E.D.F. on Tuesday, February 07, 2006 - 10:27 PM
[Reply to this
Annie Anti-Christ

 
Amen to that man! Like I've always said (since he first stole the election) - If you're not OUTRAGED - You're not paying attention!!!!
 
Posted by Annie Anti-Christ on Tuesday, February 07, 2006 - 7:59 PM
[Reply to this
El Corkerino

 
While he's talking about funding more research, he's skimping research and education in the budget. While he's talking about health care initiatives, he's cutting medicaid. He brags about cutting growth and talks about cutting the deficit in half - but he refuses to veto any of the pork laden bills.

The speech was unimpressive... the ideas unoriginal. Iceland is already converting their entire population's energy supply to hydrogen power, making initiatives that state all cars must be hydrogen compliant within the next 5-10 years, thus making head way. Mean while, Bush keeps talking and not a damn thing gets done.
 
Posted by El Corkerino on Monday, February 06, 2006 - 7:48 PM
[Reply to this
Ignorance Isn't Bliss
Dann Arky

 
And where does all the money go? We're almost at the National Debt ceiling, but has all of the money been accounted for? The Iraq war hasnt cost much more than half a trillion, if that. Where did the other 7.5++ trillion go?
 
Posted by Ignorance Isn't Bliss on Monday, February 06, 2006 - 7:51 PM
[Reply to this
Kyra's Matrix - E.D.F.

 



 
Posted by Kyra's Matrix - E.D.F. on Tuesday, February 07, 2006 - 10:36 PM
[Reply to this