MySpace


DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)

Edward Daley


Last Updated: 11/18/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: In a Relationship
Age: 46

Who Gives Kudos:


Thursday, December 04, 2008 

Category: Religion and Philosophy
The following videos incorporate subjects which led me to engage a few leftists in two separate debates concerning atheism and President-elect Obama. Feel free to add your two cents worth to the mix.





DarcPrynce
Apparently nobody ever pointed out to the atheists who put up that anti-religion sign that atheism is a religious belief. Agnostics simply state that they don't know whether or not God exists. Atheists, on the other hand, claim that God definitely doesn't exist, something which they could not possibly know, yet they still believe unquestionably. That is, by definition, a religious view. Atheists aren't anti-religious, they're anti-God.

bull579
Atheists (or at least this one) are not anti-religion or anti-god.

DarcPrynce
You can't be anti-religious and be an atheist, because atheism is a religious belief. That having been said, if you state that God does not exist, even though you've no way of knowing that he doesn't, how is that not an anti-God position? Atheism is not like agnosticism.

bull579
Atheisim is not a religious belief I currently know a God does not exist because there is no scientific proof that one does. This burden of proof does not fall on the skeptic.

DarcPrynce
No, you don't know God does not exist, which is exactly why yours is a religious belief. Not believing something exists because you lack proof of it, and knowing it does not exist aren't the same thing.

bull579
Well, then I want proof. Show me tangible, solid, peer reviewed scientific proof. Until I see that, I do in fact know that god does not exisit because in science we don't allow for this line of reasoning. Religion is a man made thing and God or whatever idol is approprate is another part of this man made invention.

DarcPrynce
There is no tangible, solid, peer reviewed, scientific proof that love exists... or even true sentience for that matter, but there are all sorts of logical reasons to believe they do. Some people have argued that love really doesn't exist, and that human consciousness is basically just a lot of biochemical reactions. There is no hard evidence to disprove those assertions, yet the vast majority of people would disagree with them.

bull579
I disagree with your statement, however I suspect that this is not going any further so I'll just leave it at that.

DarcPrynce
Fair enough, but please allow me to leave you with this final thought on the matter. None of us know that we have free will. There is no way of proving it. We might just be complex biological machines that have been programmed into believing we have free will when, in actuality, every action we take and every thought we think has been scheduled in advance. It could be that we are merely living out a play that's already been written... but I don't think so. Of course, I can't prove otherwise.

Optics233
Atheism is not a religious belief. Not believing in something is NOT in of itself a belief. You CHOOSE to believe in a god or religion, if you do not choose to you are simply not believing; there is no 'believing in not believing' - that's a bunch of BS.

DarcPrynce
Atheism isn't simply not believing in God, that is agnosticism. An agnostic says I don't know if there is a God or not, and since I'm not sure, I can't say I believe in God. Atheism, on the other hand, is the conviction that God does not exist. An atheist doesn't say he isn't sure about whether or not God exists, he claims he is sure, in spite of the fact that he can't know. That is a religious belief.

Optics233
I know what Atheism and Agnosticism are, thanks. Atheism simply IS a disbelief in God. Being agnostic is not a disbelief in God, it's an uncertainty of God's existence. Uncertainty is not the same as no belief.

DarcPrynce
The essence of being an agnostic is that you take no position on the matter of God's existence. The essence of being an atheist is that you do take a position on the matter, and your position is that, because you have no proof of God, God cannot exist... not that God MAY not exist, but that God CANNOT exist. That is, of course, not true. God CAN exist regardless of whether you are able to scientifically prove his existence or not, yet atheists still BELIEVE that God does not exist.





idiotwind75
Experience & change are not mutually exclusive mr. ding dong - by including jonas brothers, twilight, etc. in your tags it is obivious that you are just searching for attention/views - do you think that being black and hating on Obama makes you unique?! -lol, go watch some more news programs & then come back on here & regurgitate everything you heard - unoriginal tavis smiley wanna-be.

DarcPrynce
Hate? I didn't hear any hate on this video, just valid criticisms. Do you hate everyone you disagree with? Do you hate your friends when they act like fools? Do you hate your family members when they exhibit hypocrisy or say things that you know aren't true? It seems to me that Will isn't the one with hate issues here.

idiotwind75
"hating on" is a urban term used by street poets such as myself - it translates to "heavily criticizing" - Will has no faith in the black race _ everytime he speaks, MLK rolls around in his grave - nuff said.

DarcPrynce
Bullshit. 'Hating on' means criticizing with hateful intent. As for Will not having faith in the black race, did you ever stop to think that the black race isn't his main concern when he's talking about the character of an individual who just happens to be half black? MLK was against judging people based upon their race, and he would have never voted for a Marxist like Barack Obama because he was a Republican who believed that a person's actions and words were more important than their skin color.

idiotwind75
did you even watch this video?! lol_he mentions the black race numerous times during this video and admits that if Obama inspires the black race to "step up their game" then he will support Obama on that one key issue_ and of course MLK was a republican in the 1960's (almost all Black Americans were Repubs during that era) but times have changed DarcPryncess-MLK would not have supported illegally invading Iraq, just like he did not support Vietnam-MLK would have voted Obama, based on that issue

DarcPrynce
Will doesn't even mention the black community until the last minute and a half of his video, and when he does he explains that one potentially positive thing about the Obama presidency is that it might cause some people within that community to start doing things for themselves and stop counting on politicians to do everything for them. But that wasn't the main aspect of his video. His primary message is that Barry is no different than any other politician who'll say anything to get elected. As for MLK, if you think he'd simply forget the fact that the Democrat party opposes virtually every other moral position he ever embraced, just to put an end to the war in Iraq, you've been engaging in too many wake-and-bake sessions.

DarcPrynce
By the way, I agree with you that experience & change are not mutually exclusive. Hitler had very little experience and he changed the world more than just about anyone in the 20th century.

idiotwind75
Hilter was nothing but a coward with a chip on his shoulder _ the only life he changed was yours, you illiterate wacko.

DarcPrynce
So Hitler didn't change any lives when he started World War II, which led directly to the slaughter of millions of people and destroyed most of Europe... Do you realize how idiotic your response is? As for me being illiterate, if that were the case, I wouldn't be able to post remarks here. Try learning the meaning of words before you use them, schmuck.

idiotwind75
It is easy to kill, rape, murder, & exterminate - EASY - on the other hand, it hard to live a life of righteousness on this earth & to treat your fellow man with love & respect - when push came to shove, Hitler committed suicide instead of dealing with his consequences like a real man- But you are correct in a sense; Hitler did make the Jewish people stronger & more prosperous than ever, after they perservered through the horrific holocaust - you read, but you don't understand.

DarcPrynce
What does anything you just wrote have to do with the FACT that Hitler changed the world, and that he was relatively inexperienced in politics before he took power? He never held any public office before becoming Chancellor. His only experience was one of street agitator, yet in less than a decade he controlled most of Europe and half of Asia. As for Hitler making the Jews stronger and more prosperous, he did no such thing. The Jews became stronger IN SPITE of the Holocaust, not because of it.

DarcPrynce
What's easy is convincing average people that you are capable of making their lives better, if you happen to be a gifted and charismatic speaker. The hard part comes when those people begin to realize that only they can make positive changes in their lives, and that politicians usually make matters a whole lot worse all the way around. The best thing any politician can do is inspire people to achieve their dreams and then get out of their way and let them. Marxists refuse to get out of the way.
Kathy Lorain~KLo

 
First I'll be back later my dear I gotta give up the computer...:(
 
Posted by Kathy Lorain~KLo on Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 12:45 AM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
Wicked bummer, dudette. ;o(
 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 12:48 AM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
Normally I'd not waste my time with such sheeple, but what can I say... I've been feeling generous with my considerable wisdom lately. :o)
 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 1:27 AM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
No sir, my humility is only exceeded by my wit, charm and sparkling personality. :o)
 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 3:53 AM
[Reply to this
Ben X "Repeal the 17th Amendment."

 
You are absolutely correct that Atheism, Agnostic, Hedonism, Humanism are ALL religions! Religions do not need to be deity based. Examples of recognized non-deity based religions are Buddhism, Confucianism, and even Taoism is not bound by any deities although it does have a pathos. Mostly Taoism is based in nature. And we haven’t even began to touch those accepted religions that are solely nature based.


All you really need to do to establish a religion is to establish a moral code or a creed. It does not have to be deity based. Clearly all the examples I listed fall into this category, even Atheism. The reason is because the belief that there are no deities brings cause to live your life a certain way. And that is a religion, even if it's on a personal scale. Even Confucius and Buddha were at one time the only one who believed in their religion.


Case closed!
 
Posted by Ben X "Repeal the 17th Amendment." on Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 11:16 PM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
It can be argued that agnosticism is not technically a religion, because it does not incorporate any belief system, or concern itself with the nature of existence, or of the universe and its creation. Agnostics simply state that they have no opinion on such matters. One could say that they are sort of the Switzerland of the religious wars.

 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Tuesday, December 09, 2008 - 8:00 PM
[Reply to this
OS -- the ORIGINAL Steve-o!

 
When are you going to learn that you just can't reason with them? LOL
 
Posted by OS -- the ORIGINAL Steve-o! on Friday, December 05, 2008 - 6:57 PM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
Oh, I learned that a long time ago... it's just that every so often I like to publicly expose their ignorance and hypocrisy.

 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Tuesday, December 09, 2008 - 8:02 PM
[Reply to this
Brian Loves Melinda

 
LOL. I love slapping idiots like these around. It makes for a nice past-time or a hobby to cure boredom...
 
Posted by Brian Loves Melinda on Saturday, December 06, 2008 - 6:38 AM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
Absolutely! ;o)
 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Tuesday, December 09, 2008 - 8:03 PM
[Reply to this
Mark J.A.

 
I'm an atheist, but I am a libertarian. I have some views that you might consider very liberal, such as on gay marriage, but I also have many views that are very conservative, such as in matters of the 2nd ammendment, foreign and economic policy. That being said/clarified, let me share my thoughts with you here.


Atheism is a lack of a beleif. I do not believe in god, simple as that. I do not have a belief in a negative, that god does not exist. Out of all the gods out there, I believe in one less than you, and that is our difference. I do not hold my atheism as absolute for it cannot be proven absolutely, but there simply is no reason to beleive in a god.


You said ***"The essence of being an agnostic is that you take no position on the matter of God's existence.
The essence of being an atheist is that you do take a position on the matter"***

The agnostic takes a position in that they do not know, or believe there is something out there and just do not know what. The atheist takes a position as well that there is no reason to believe the same as there is no reason to believe in any other claim that cannot to any degree meet the burden of proof.


You said ***"God CAN exist regardless of whether you are able to scientifically prove his existence or not"***

This is the ultimate "what if" argument. Anything CAN exist in this context and then we are suppost to be forced to what based on that, all encompassing uncertainty? That something "could" exist is no reason to be uncertian about it and especially not to believe in it.


You said ***"Not believing something exists because you lack proof of it, and knowing it does not exist aren't the same thing.
"***

I agree. I don't agree with everything the guy says in the video.


***"Hate? I didn't hear any hate on this video, just valid criticisms.
"***

I didn't hear any hate either. Would I have supported putting a sign like that up? No, not personally, I don't find it appropriate or necessary. But it is NOT an attack, and lets be clear on that, I mean you yourself ask about being offended over simple expression. If this sign is an attack, then I could be petty and vain enough to take offence to every church sign I see that says something about hell. Contridiction and debate fuel progress, anger stifles this progress. I say let people express themselves. This from an atheist who won't hesitate to tell you Merry Christmas (I put up lights today as a matter of fact).


Thanks for your time,
Mark
 
Posted by Mark J.A. on Sunday, December 07, 2008 - 8:08 AM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
If you believe that God does not exist merely because you can't prove scientifically that he does, you are, in effect, stating that the universe and all existence came into being without the benefit of a creator. If that is the case, then you have adopted a belief system known as naturalism. Naturalism is a religious belief system because it incorporates all of the pertinent aspects of any other religion. If, on the other hand, you state that you have no opinion on the matter of existence and how it came into being, then you are an agnostic.

 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Tuesday, December 09, 2008 - 8:16 PM
[Reply to this
Mark J.A.

 
It has nothing to do with being able to prove anything, its the fact that not only is there NO evidence for a conscious force governing the universe, in many cases there is plenty of evidence against it, in things such as the 2nd law of thermodynamics, and the randomness inherent in genetic sequencing. Then once you start to define your god and his doctrine such as in christianity, there are plenty of fallacies, lies, brutality, and contridiction. My "opinion" on the matter of existence is science, my "opinion" strives for as much objectivity as possible. If you would like to label me something other than an atheist, I am a rationalist.

 
Posted by Mark J.A. on Thursday, December 11, 2008 - 5:36 AM
[Reply to this
Brian Mora

 
You really ought to ask me about the Hollywood actress who got into an inbox to inbox dialogue about fake marriage.

 
Posted by Brian Mora on Sunday, December 07, 2008 - 9:23 AM
[Reply to this
DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley)
Edward Daley

 
Well, since there is no such thing as "gay marriage," I tend to refrain from arguing with people about it. That having been said, when I do take the time to comment on the subject, my opinion is generally this: homosexuals have the exact same right to marry that straight people have. For instance, any "gay" man is free to marry any single, adult, female who is not a member of his immediate family. The fact that he may not be so inclined to do so, for purely sexual reasons, is beside the point.

 
Posted by DarcPrynce (aka Edward L. Daley) on Tuesday, December 09, 2008 - 8:28 PM
[Reply to this