MySpace

Science Matters

David Suzuki Foundation

David Suzuki


Last Updated: 10/27/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

Gender: Male
Status: Married
Age: 73
Sign: Aries

City: Vancouver
State: British Columbia
Country: CA
Signup Date: 8/29/2006
Friday, October 09, 2009 
Science Matters | October 9, 2009
By David Suzuki with Faisal Moola




It's amazing what world leaders can do when they come together for a common cause, as they did in Montreal in 1987 to ban CFCs to protect the ozone layer. In December, our leaders will have a tremendous opportunity in Copenhagen to take the world into a new era of innovation and prosperity.

But, as was the case in Montreal, this opportunity is born out of crisis. The threat of climate change is real and imminent. Scientists from around the world have confirmed this through continuous study and observation - despite what the increasingly desperate and nonsensical arguments from deniers would have you believe.

This is no longer a political issue. It's an issue of utmost importance to all of us, no matter where on the political spectrum we feel most comfortable. And we're finally seeing some agreement about confronting this challenge among world leaders from the left, centre, and right. It's especially a conservative issue. After all, as Denmark's Minister of Climate and Energy, Connie Hedegaard, points out, a core conservative belief is "that what you inherit you should pass on to the next generation." And that doesn't mean passing on our mess!



Conservatives also believe that we should live within our means, save some of what we have for tomorrow, and act with care and caution. Conservatives with deep religious conviction know also that we are stewards of the Earth - and good stewardship means protecting the Earth, its resources, and its life.

The December climate summit in Copenhagen is a crossroads. We can continue to delay while the Earth's natural systems reach tipping points beyond which we may not be able to find our way back, or we can move forward in our efforts to slow global warming, reduce pollution, and create new opportunities for healthier lives and stronger economies.

Many world leaders are already committed to negotiating an agreement in Copenhagen that is ambitious, fair, and binding, and many have started implementing solutions in their own countries. Unfortunately, Canada is falling behind. Our national targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions have been called ineffective, and our performance at a number of recent climate meetings has been labelled "obstructionist".

Our inaction comes from fear. Because Canada is a major oil producer, politicians and some businesspeople are afraid that reducing our reliance on fossil fuels will harm the economy. But that's short-sighted. If we continue to rely on dwindling non-renewable energy supplies, we'll be left in the dust as the rest of the world moves forward to a green economy, with innovation, jobs, and money from new technologies such as renewable energy infrastructure.



If we were to use our fossil-fuel resources such as oil more wisely, we could make them last longer and derive more national economic benefits from them while we make the transition to a clean-energy economy. The side benefits would include less pollution and environmental damage, a more stable economy, and healthier citizens.

If we continue down the same road, however, we risk catastrophic consequences to our economy and to our very lives. Scientists agree that if average temperatures on Earth rise just another degree, global warming could reach a point of no return, with melting icecaps, rising sea levels, increasing waves of climate refugees, extinction of plants and animals, and floods, droughts, and other severe weather events.

As a northern nation, Canada is particularly vulnerable to climate change. The impact is magnified near the Earth's poles, largely because of the loss of ice and snow coverage. Canada also has the longest marine coastline in the world, so sea-level rise would have a dramatic effect with enormous economic consequences. Many Canadians are already feeling the sting of climate change, especially in the North and in other communities that depend on forestry, fisheries, and agriculture.

Change is never easy, and taking bold steps can come with costs in the short term. But refusing to change means we are condemning ourselves and our children and grandchildren to an uncertain and dangerous future. We can all take individual action to reduce our emissions, but ultimately, we must let our leaders know that we expect them to seize the opportunity in Copenhagen to create a secure and healthy future for our small blue planet and all the people who share it.

Photos by simonella_virus & species_snob via Flickr. Creative Commons licensed.
Eco Inventions
Neil Lizotte

 
 Going green not only makes jobs but can save companies and governments  and the taxpayers a lot of money.  For example in Orange County, USA  the city had installed solar pannels on the roof of their convention center.  Acording to the Mayor they're now saving $3,000,000.00 per year in power expenses.  Now if all our schools, hospitals, government buildings and businesses had solar power on their flat roofs how much money would be saved and how many jobs would be created.  Interview with the Mayor  We now have the Sterling Solar Dish, which just one can power ten homes.  I would sooner have one of these solar dish's for every ten homes than high voltage power lines through my neighborhood. short video of the Sterling solar dish 
We need our governments to invest in new green technology like the (MYT) massive Yet Tiny  Engine shown in this short video
The Mighty Engine by Raphial Morgado



 
Posted by Eco Inventions on Thursday, October 15, 2009 - 8:13 AM
[Reply to this
ElectroPig™
ElectroPig Von Fökkengrüüven

 
Bold steps do not neccessarily need to be idiotic ones.  In Leamington, Ruthven and Kingsville, Ontario, there is currently a "giant turbine project" slated for Pigeon Bay.  (If Dave ever actually access this blog, he'll know the entire area first hand.)  This is a ridiculous attack on the bird migration routes, the residents who would be directly affected by the project--and who do NOT want it in their backyards--the fisheries in the area, and the large Heinz factory, which has already expressed grave concerns about water quality issues in direct relation to this project.  Heinz has already stated that if this turbine project is allowed to continue, the questions about water quality will force it to close AT LEAST the baby food line, throwing hundreds of workers out on the street.  Permanently.

At the same time, a company in Windsor Ontario--only 45 minutes away--is gearing up to product small-scale 6 foot "home turbines" that anyone who actually WANTS a turbine can get their own.  Farmers would love to have a SMALL turbine on the barn or shed or workshop to save a little money and bring their costs electricity down...but none of them who've actually lived within range of these turbines which currently sit in Wheatley, Ontario, want to remain in those areas.  They are selling their farms and moving, SOLELY due to the wind farms being too close to where they used to live, but currently "exist."

Noone is taking seriously the tens of thousands of acres of south-facing roof space that would be impossibly easy to plaster with solar panels.  There are enough roofs in Southern Ontario alone to completely cover ALL of Ontario's power needs...and with considerably lower maintenance costs than either the existing power grid, or these ridiculous monstrosities that SouthPoint Wind is planning on plopping into the Pigeon Bay area.

I've suggested that the government get more involved in solar photovoltaics for decades, and while every contact I've made with any level of government has come back with "Yes, that's an excellent idea!" there has not been a single case of positive action towards this common sense idea.  Since I started making these suggestions when I was about 10, this means that I've been attempting to get the Canadian government to use their heads for 3 decades...so far...no luck.

With little more than three or four things occurring, Canada can be totally energy independent, totally self-sufficient as to food production, and a healthier and safer people.  Unfortunately, none of these common sense issues are being considered, as it seems that the Canadian Government has an agenda which does not include common sense.  It seems to specifically preclude the health, education, or any form of self-reliance for the Canadian people.

Now I completely understand the idea of creating a world in which cooperative efforts are globally balanced, but by making every country interdependent is only a foolish way to go about this, as with the full interdependence of each country on every other country, the end result will be that whenever any single country decides that they're not getting their fair share, they can simply close their borders to shipping their "globally interdependently required goods or services" and EVERY other country will suffer until they get what they want, or until they are bombed out of existence.

The only long-term solution to the problem is the exact opposite plan which has been attempted thus far:  Make every country as self-sufficient as possible.

Personally, there are three things which tell me beyond any doubt that "global waraming" or "climate changs" is a hoax:

  1)  If all the other planets are also warming up, how did our "fossil fuel exhaust" get to every other planet in our solar system?  Could there be some truth in the science of solar activity?  Hmmm....

  2)  Almost every one of the world's governments came to a concensus almost immediately.  Since this doesn't appear to have ever happened in human history, this is also quite suspect.

  3)  All those governments had taxation schemes already prepared, which were "produced for public viewing" in a few weeks to a few months of the announcements of their agreements.  THIS MAKES SENSE!  If the world's governments were all planning on finding a new way to take money from citizens, that is...

  Let's face facts.  Jimmy Carter did a great job raising mileage while he was president, and for 30 years his work was halted or reversed by others, to the benefit of oil companies and the detriment of both the people and the supplies of fossil fuels being needlessly wasted.

  Sorry, Dave, but if you'll pardon my brevity, I think that all of this global warming terrorism that our governments are offering us as "the truth" is little more than contrived garbage meant to take more of our money, as usual, in the guise of "protecting us from ourselves."

PS:  If there were really any need for carbon sequestration programs, hemp would have been legalized decades back, as it is the quickest, safest, cheapest, and easiest PROVEN METHOD of carbon sequestration.  It can be used for food, fuel, lubricants, building materials, car parts, plastics...over 35,000 POTENTIAL products which are currently withheld from production due to lack of availability of the raw materials.  That's not even considering the medical benefits if cannabis was simply re-legalized.

Google for The Lotus "Eco Elise" to see what IS possible.
 


 
Posted by ElectroPig™ on Friday, October 16, 2009 - 6:08 PM
[Reply to this